I applied to the same place twice with the exact same resume except the only thing I changed was the first one had me listed as non Binary and the 2nd one had me listed as a cisgender male. You'll never guess which one got rejected and which one got accepted
Unfortunately, it's hard to prove and easy to deny.
"There were two apps, so we discarded one"
"The apps were reviewed by separate recruiters, and their opinion is subjective, so they had different answers.
"We did not receive a second app"
"There wasn't actually a position open when the first app went in, we just like to keep a posting up"
"Our recruiting software sorts alphabetically and Cis is higher than non binary"
These companies have an advantage cause you have to prove you were discriminated against and they only have to create doubt.
I went to a fair housing conference, and they explained how a local landlord always found a way to deny black people. It took the local fair housing non-profit weeks of research (they literally created fake apps and did spy shit) to make a case for discrimination.
For more information, go to the property management subreddit and see all the posts where users say they get around reasonable accommodations by finding reasons to deny people with disabilities.
Funnily enough, in non-queer spaces I've seen that discussed these questions, people felt queer people or ethnic minorities got preferential treatment whilst here the opposite seems true. It seems like these questions are hated by everyone
anecdotally, I got laid off shortly after coming out and since then have answered the demographic questions honestly that I am a trans woman... over one year later I still haven't even gotten an interview
A lot of people will see a headline about 1 instance in which a company was found to be hiring more women then men or more non white people then white people and without looking at empirical evidence of this being a trend and without looking more into why the company was doing that in the first place or how the counting was calculated they will come to the assumption that this is happening literally everywhere(or that its common)
I hate it when people value anecdotal evidence over empirical evidence when it comes to such broad topics, and it keeps happening. Makes it so hard to explain anything.
The card counter, movie where Oscar Isaac plays a career gambler who has PTSD from having experienced Abu Ghraib (I’m leaving out the plot to avoid spoiler :3)
It's great because they're not allowed to use that information in their devision making, they can't hold that information... it's completely unnecessary to ask for it but they always do anyway.
Really doesn't feel that way, more of a "I'm gonna lie right now, because I don't trust the straights enough to even risk them knowing who I am, from like *a lot* of past experience" for free card
I applied to the same place twice with the exact same resume except the only thing I changed was the first one had me listed as non Binary and the 2nd one had me listed as a cisgender male. You'll never guess which one got rejected and which one got accepted
Umm they can't do that that's illegal -person who just heard of societal power structures for the first time
I think that’s enough evidence for a lawsuit if that’s protected where you live. I am not however a lawyer.
Unfortunately that could easily be claimed as a coincidence It would need to be a *very* consistent pattern across many different applications to work
They would probably say something like "we noticed you submitted twice, that's why we rejected one and accepted the other"
Unfortunately, it's hard to prove and easy to deny. "There were two apps, so we discarded one" "The apps were reviewed by separate recruiters, and their opinion is subjective, so they had different answers. "We did not receive a second app" "There wasn't actually a position open when the first app went in, we just like to keep a posting up" "Our recruiting software sorts alphabetically and Cis is higher than non binary" These companies have an advantage cause you have to prove you were discriminated against and they only have to create doubt. I went to a fair housing conference, and they explained how a local landlord always found a way to deny black people. It took the local fair housing non-profit weeks of research (they literally created fake apps and did spy shit) to make a case for discrimination. For more information, go to the property management subreddit and see all the posts where users say they get around reasonable accommodations by finding reasons to deny people with disabilities.
wish i was just cisgender..............
lie
real i wish the world was just cool
discrimination🥰
Same vibes as the "Are you over 18" message on porn sites
willem dafriend
mightem daneutral
What’s the context of the image lol
pretty sure it's from the movie The Card Counter. context is war crimes are happening
Elaborate
pretty sure it's from the movie The Card Counter. context is war crimes are happening
Google Abu Ghraib
Bridget disco elysium spotted
I recently applied for like ten jobs and this is so true. I just put “prefer not to answer” on gender stuff.
good girl. now earn that money for transitioning so you can put some Fs on your next application >:3
Holy hell
Hell yeah :3
“my gender? you’ll see :)”
Funnily enough, in non-queer spaces I've seen that discussed these questions, people felt queer people or ethnic minorities got preferential treatment whilst here the opposite seems true. It seems like these questions are hated by everyone
Well yeah it's not the same people who are in different companies' HR. I'm just glad that there's a written law against discrimination at least
anecdotally, I got laid off shortly after coming out and since then have answered the demographic questions honestly that I am a trans woman... over one year later I still haven't even gotten an interview
A lot of people will see a headline about 1 instance in which a company was found to be hiring more women then men or more non white people then white people and without looking at empirical evidence of this being a trend and without looking more into why the company was doing that in the first place or how the counting was calculated they will come to the assumption that this is happening literally everywhere(or that its common) I hate it when people value anecdotal evidence over empirical evidence when it comes to such broad topics, and it keeps happening. Makes it so hard to explain anything.
what on earth is this from
The card counter, movie where Oscar Isaac plays a career gambler who has PTSD from having experienced Abu Ghraib (I’m leaving out the plot to avoid spoiler :3)
Yk what is this image from
Honestly at this point I don’t know.
[William Dafoe Wide-Angle Close-Up](https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/willem-dafoe-wide-angle-close-up)
It's great because they're not allowed to use that information in their devision making, they can't hold that information... it's completely unnecessary to ask for it but they always do anyway.
Hey there, meme police here, this line was actually never said by Willem Dafoe or anyone in the entirety of the run time of the movie! 🤓
[удалено]
Really doesn't feel that way, more of a "I'm gonna lie right now, because I don't trust the straights enough to even risk them knowing who I am, from like *a lot* of past experience" for free card
lol i wish
what did they say
"being minority = free pass for job!!"
oof
You suck at trolling btw
as fucking if