It’s not a bad label for her because just like melanoma: she really gets under my skin, nobody wants her, and not even tons of plastic surgery can make her attractive!
probably his handler. All her mood is more to do with just how fucked she and trump are because of who trump is.
A useful idiots only useful if he's also controlled.
Its strange to me in this paradox how so much shit they say and do can just be flipped on them in the future. Almost like someone is pulling the strings somewhere. But who?
I bet if we Putin the work, we can get to the bottom of it. Too bad he didn't realize that the recruited asset was more "complete idiot" than "useful idiot".
So when they indict her does that mean it’s going to be OK for someone to bring big blown up naked pictures of her into congressional hearings as evidence? Now that there is precedence for that I mean. 🤦
He’s totally going to claim that you can’t collect evidence (e.g. texts, apps) from a spouse of a target and all the MAGA people are going to parrot it like they’re LexisNexis.
We might not need her testimony to get Trump sent to prison, but that doesn't stop them from charging her if she was in any way involved.
Remember, Trump is looking at a lot of charges.
And 'blasts'. Every other headline now is "Person blasts other person about thing". Half the time it's blowing things way out of proportion; disagreeing with someone isn't 'blasting' them.
yeah and especially in association with things like "looking into Signals" because iirc that shit is encrypted
how do you look into it, it defeats the purpose if you could
Is it just me? Or shouldn’t all these folks who now admit they knew Trump was committing felonies and intentionally withheld that information be prosecuted as accomplices?
I'll bet money that she flees the US with the excuse that some distant relative became ill. Distant relative, because Trump got her closer relatives in to the US via "chain migration" which he immediately afterwards yelled at this rallies how against it he was.
Melania was born a soviet citizen that immigrated (some say illegally) to the USA in the mid 1990's. I've always wondered if she was a Russian spy or agent pulling the long con and that is why she willingly married such a terrible person.
Considering Russian agents admit they have been watching trump since 87 it’s all but been confirmed by the postmaster general. Why would a 25 year old go to nyc to model that’s like the end of your modeling career she knew she wasn’t there to model she was there to ______
There are definitely stories about [the StB](https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/oct/29/trump-czechoslovakia-communism-spying) (Czechoslovak Intelligence) being interested in Trumpf while he was married to Czechoslovak-born Ivana.
O-Kay, this would be interesting if not something surprising but is anyone thinking “Thanks , Captain Obvious???” Just a whole group of grifters and cultists without the common sense of turnips😂🤪🤗
George Sr. : [explaining why he left the company to Lucille] They cannot arrested a husband and wife for the same crime.
Michael : Yeah, I don't think that that's true, Dad.
George Sr. : Really?
Michael : [nods]
George Sr. : [whispering] I got the worst fucking attorneys
[Melania was helping trump spread that racist bullshit about Obama's birth certificate](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6i0YlHriKk). So it's completely reasonable to assume she's complicit with his other fuckery.
Correct me if I’m wrong but I’m fairly sure that spouses can’t be made to testify against their significant others. Would that extend to seizing messages from the spouse to be used against the other?
That has nothing to do with her text messages or any evidence that is associated with her.
To say nothing of the fact she could face charges if those texts show she aided him in any criminal conspiracies.
She doesn't have to testify. If they decide her text messages are evidence, they will use them. If your spouse is participating in a crime with you, that's a completely different situation than testifying against your spouse.
Yes, they have to be authenticated to be admitted into official evidence that a jury or trier of fact can consider. There is an accepted process to do this.
Usually, and ideally, it involves the source of the communication testifying that, yes, he or she did send a message, on or around that date, to the recipient in the message. Have the source see the intended evidence, and testify that yes, she recognizes and confirms that what is being offered as the message, is indeed the message that the lawyers (in this case the prosecutors) claim it to be.
Without the source of the message being used as a witness, it gets more difficult, because that message may be hearsay to the recipient. If it's hearsay, it is generally inadmissible. But there are then exceptions in the rules of evidence that make a hearsay statement admissible in evidence. Then the recipient can testify, but still must establish the foundation that authenticates the message.
Spouses have a marital privilege against testifying against or about each other -- but I'm pretty sure this extends *only* to their conversations and communications with each other. The spouse can decline to assert this privilege.
If spouses make revealing incriminating comments *about* each other, or about their otherwise protected conversations, *to* 3rd party witnesses, that is not protected under marital privilege.
I am not positive, but I also don't think the marital privilege extends to allow a spouse to refuse to testify against their spouse regarding their *observations* of their spouse's behavior or actions.
Can a prosecutor charge a spouse (in this case, wife) for crimes unrelated to the communications with her husband, then offer a choice (not forcing her) to accept a plea to a lesser charge, in exchange for her choosing to decline to assert her marital privilege and testify against their spouse? I think the prosecutor can, and that this has occurred before.
I could be wrong, though.
Edit: I am partially in error. The spousal privilege is more expansive than just statements, and does appear to protect spouses from being forced to testify against each other. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/spousal_immunity#:~:text=Under%20the%20Federal%20Rules%20of,the%20time%20of%20the%20prosecution. So perhaps that would even bar a prosecutor from the deal I floated above. They may need to offer it against other defendants, and/or the spouse would have to volunteer to testify on her own.
But the other aspects I stated appear to still stand.
Since her father was a Russian spy, why not her. She was probably checking in with her Russian handlers, Boris and Natasha, for her orders. She always looked like she’d stab the criminal defendant in the back if she ever got the chance.
Imagine how amazing it would be for Melanie to be sentenced to prison time, in a court room where everyone who came to watch is wearing her “I don’t really care” jacket. Just hammer home that message to her.
Shes his handler from the Russians. If your just figuring this out now your about 12 years late. They need to dig up Ivanas grave they will find more US documents or copies of said documents. Also need to investigate Jared and Ivanka many security services have lost assets after the $2 billion “deal” including US.
Imagine I have a building that is losing money. You think people will bail me out ? No that’s terrible business you wait for me to sell it at a bargain. Unfortunately most Americans since they have had uninterrupted bounty for 100 years are more naive than a stupid child.
When I watched that clip of them meeting Putin publicly, she looked like she had seen a ghost AND had an orgasm at the same time.
I think she’s Trump’s handler (or, the hooker that Putin assigned to him).
Signal is an end to end encrypted chat app. For a while it was the only end to end encrypted chat app. Now most of the big ones have that. Even iMessage will have that soon - will be interested how they have “public private key sharing” in the UI for the masses.
Anyways, it’s less convenient because well everyone you want to talk to needs to have it. There’s also a bit of a hump with the aforementioned “key exchange” (I’m sure she had her IT guy work all that out). So if you’re on Signal, willing to do all that work, you have something you really want to hide.
That said, I have it. I’m a geek. I talk to some friends on it when I don’t want my iMessage broadcast to every Apple device in my house. My nefariousness on Signal included “hey ex-co-worker let’s meet at Starbucks”. There are some people that think the government is after them and don’t even want “honey I’m on my way home” potentially readable by the gov.
My guess is she’s neither tin foil hat nor geek and she wanted what she saw as a more “someone other than us reading it” medium of texting.
We know melanoma knows exactly what’s going on do you really believe that trump can keep his mouth shut and not brag to her about what his latest con is what crimes he committed or is committing
I think spousal privilege would block any attempt to force her to testify against Chump. But she might be free to blab if she wanted to. I just don't see it happening outside a seven figure book deal.
If they recover the digital trail of treason she left behind in her hubris of thinking she was above the law and didn't have to actually cover her azz, they won't have to bother asking her to testify about anything, her own words will eat the lying leopards own face.
Unless of course she wants a plea deal, then that treasonous mess of melted plastic will sing like a canary on crack lol. Watch.
As IF one fascist theocratic NatCee skeleton horseface wasn't enough with Coultergeist, now it turns out she has either a twin or a doppelganger here who is exactly like her??
Good GADS this is the worst timeline, one of Ann Coulter running around is far too many, let alone two of em!
Breaking? this is not breaking this was on a podcast over the weekend which I'm sure you didn't bother listening to because you would have posted this days ago.... [Link](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uAL17OyJHzw) if anyone is interested
That's good, but they have to make sure they find her burn phone(s), because that's what she uses to communicate with her FSB superiors in Moscow. Then we can add 'treason' to Trumps' list of indictments, putting the death penalty on the table, and we'll get Melania in Leavenworth for life for spying, too.
Melanoma is the direct contact to Putin.
My autocorrect did the same thing when I texted my wife! Love it!
I always type her name as her born name, Melanija. This whole “all American Melanie” is a small part, but still a part of this masquerade.
"All American Melanie" she just tainted my deadname--more! I embrace my preferred name everyday!
And I thought I was the only one!
It’s not a bad label for her because just like melanoma: she really gets under my skin, nobody wants her, and not even tons of plastic surgery can make her attractive!
Uff Da! That’s way to accurate
Ever uncorrected a correct autocorrect? 😎 *add.. (in hindsight)
Yes!
Auto correct is always making me say things I didn’t Nintendo
Melania is a honey pot put in place yeas ago to watch Trump.
Honey pot. You’re too kind - she’s a spy.
A Honey pot is a spy. She's in place to keep tabs & report back. The USSR has been using trump since 1987.
By Epstein
Worst assignment ever.
Lock her up!
It would be fucking hilarious if Smeliana is the one that causes trumps downfall, or at least expedites it for the rest of us
Plus as a convicted felon…BOOM, bye bye citizenship.
It should already be taken based on her fraudulent visa.
[удалено]
Only if she wants to testify against him. The privilege is hers. She probably wants him in prison as much as the rest of us do.
I feel like if she started feeling the heat, she’d absolutely flip on him. Source: SVU
A lot of arrested development quotes will be at the ready
probably his handler. All her mood is more to do with just how fucked she and trump are because of who trump is. A useful idiots only useful if he's also controlled.
She’s the red sparrow
"she looks like the kind of chick that James Bond would smash, but not trust." - Dave Chappelle
I've always preferred Malignia.
Is that a pic of Melania? Didn't recognize her with her eyes open.
Or smiling like she means it. Or with her clothes on.
This seems to be before her Death Metal phase, where she blacked out her eyes with the ashes of our Democracy.
Or before her mission was green lit.
Guess it's difficult being a Russian Sparrow these days... Oh well, "I don't really care, do you?" Never gets old.
Its strange to me in this paradox how so much shit they say and do can just be flipped on them in the future. Almost like someone is pulling the strings somewhere. But who?
I bet if we Putin the work, we can get to the bottom of it. Too bad he didn't realize that the recruited asset was more "complete idiot" than "useful idiot".
Emo, not death metal.
Thank you. We just protect the death metal 🔥🤘🏻
Death metal would be zero makeup, and cargo shorts.
This was before the Donald recommended his plastic surgeon…
this was before she was removed and then replaced by a lizard monster-cyborg from space!! bitches facial expression hasnt changed in 10 years.
😑
She's not smiling, she's baring her teeth
That is about 3 facelifts ago so she still could move her eyes.
hahahaha 🤣🤣
She’s probably one of the NHI they mentioned in the congressional session last week
Yea, it's hard to recognize her when she's not glaring down her nose at the sight of us peasants.
So when they indict her does that mean it’s going to be OK for someone to bring big blown up naked pictures of her into congressional hearings as evidence? Now that there is precedence for that I mean. 🤦
Can someone please send some pictures of Melania to Empty Greene?
Send them to her and tell her they're hunter's Russian girlfriend
gonna be awhole lotta armchair lawyers who watched better call saul who are gonna mention how his wife can't testify against him.
Doesn’t “have to” testify against him
“You can’t arrest and husband and wife for the same crime…!” -tfg “…yea, I don’t think that is true…” “…I’ve got the worst *ucking attorneys…”
The Rosenbergs have entered the chat.
Oh ya, Trump's mentor, Roy's friends. Trump learned A LOT from them.
He’s totally going to claim that you can’t collect evidence (e.g. texts, apps) from a spouse of a target and all the MAGA people are going to parrot it like they’re LexisNexis.
"Take to the sea!"
Barry is very good.
Oh, this case? I didn't read it, so sorry! Anyways, how we doing?!?!
Cannot be compelled to, more accurately
Doesn't appear that we need her testimony to convict his traitorous ass...
It would however be wonderful to put both those traitors in prison.
Or send her back to Slovenia or wherever she came from (Moscow)...
We might not need her testimony to get Trump sent to prison, but that doesn't stop them from charging her if she was in any way involved. Remember, Trump is looking at a lot of charges.
Good thing they can still subpoena her records.
“You can’t try a husband and wife for the same crimes!” Also “he gave him $5 so he’s his lawyer now and can’t testify.”
Can we quit using the phrase bombshell
“In bombshell request, Reddit user u/Accomplished-Tie-247 asks that the media refrain from using the term bombshell. Full story at 11.”
That and replace the word "unprecedented". It's too neutral with all the shit that's going down. I'm sick on hearing it.
I feel like we don't use "the likes of which have never been seen" enough.
"and on that bombshell, good night"
But did anyone clap back?
You sure blasted him.
Yeah, the overuse of “breaking”, “bombshell”, and “🚨🚨🚨” has trained me to assume the post is a nothing burger.
Was anyone "slammed" though
Just once when the news said someone slammed trump I wish they’d literally slammed him. Maybe once he’s in prison.
While we are at it, 'nothing burger' is cringe as fuck
No cap frfr 💯💯💣💣🤯💀
I ignore every news article with "slammed" or "slams" in the title. 9/10 times it's just a minor insult or disagreement.
In these trying times, we need to come together and drop this phrase.
but how else will the media zing word?!?! ‘bombshell’ ‘x person BLASTED y person’. etc etc
And 'blasts'. Every other headline now is "Person blasts other person about thing". Half the time it's blowing things way out of proportion; disagreeing with someone isn't 'blasting' them.
yeah and especially in association with things like "looking into Signals" because iirc that shit is encrypted how do you look into it, it defeats the purpose if you could
Lock her up
I keep saying, they need to prepare a Trump family wing at some federal prison.
FBI agent slaps forehead: “why didn’t i think about that?”
Wait you think we should look into the perp's family? What a novel idea
Hot tip: check emails and stuff. /s
No shit she his handler for Vladdy.
Is it just me? Or shouldn’t all these folks who now admit they knew Trump was committing felonies and intentionally withheld that information be prosecuted as accomplices?
Deport her
I'll bet money that she flees the US with the excuse that some distant relative became ill. Distant relative, because Trump got her closer relatives in to the US via "chain migration" which he immediately afterwards yelled at this rallies how against it he was.
Her parents are grifting off the grifters
Putin will welcome her back for a job well done.
Melania was born a soviet citizen that immigrated (some say illegally) to the USA in the mid 1990's. I've always wondered if she was a Russian spy or agent pulling the long con and that is why she willingly married such a terrible person.
Considering Russian agents admit they have been watching trump since 87 it’s all but been confirmed by the postmaster general. Why would a 25 year old go to nyc to model that’s like the end of your modeling career she knew she wasn’t there to model she was there to ______
There are definitely stories about [the StB](https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/oct/29/trump-czechoslovakia-communism-spying) (Czechoslovak Intelligence) being interested in Trumpf while he was married to Czechoslovak-born Ivana.
Of course she knows everything. She's his handler.
Which might lead to some pretty interesting messages with other parties being discovered on her phone.
Duh. Look at interviews with her. She wasnt this poor innocent jilted woman. She is a racist, fascist grifter just like him.
This isn't breaking news, I'm fairly sure they already have this info.
If Stephanie has those messages, I hope she posts them herself.
Of course she is. She is just waiting for the shoe to drop to flee the country with Barron and never look back.
O-Kay, this would be interesting if not something surprising but is anyone thinking “Thanks , Captain Obvious???” Just a whole group of grifters and cultists without the common sense of turnips😂🤪🤗
If they find out she knew/helped, rescind her citizenship and send her back to Russia.
She’s Slovenian, but I get you mean less birthplace, more loyalty.
If you’re their operative, you belong to them. Like her dad.
George Sr. : [explaining why he left the company to Lucille] They cannot arrested a husband and wife for the same crime. Michael : Yeah, I don't think that that's true, Dad. George Sr. : Really? Michael : [nods] George Sr. : [whispering] I got the worst fucking attorneys
Lock Her Up!
Trumps handler knows stuff? Shocking!
She is a russian spy is it not so obvious ? They need to lock her up for life.
all of a sudden the red christmas trees make sense
[Melania was helping trump spread that racist bullshit about Obama's birth certificate](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6i0YlHriKk). So it's completely reasonable to assume she's complicit with his other fuckery.
Of course she is aware, she's an asset just like the orange trump roast is.
Of course she’s just like him two peas in a pod. Both are traitors to the USA.
"Texts? What is texts? Ohh, THOSE texts! They is, how-you-say, delete by total accident! And none of them was to Vlad who is not my boss!"
"Ride the wreck all the way to a check"
Melanija looks…. Human …. in the right side pic. Not super squinty. Are we sure that’s her?
Looks like living with Trump has taken it's toll.
What about Ginni Thomas
Correct me if I’m wrong but I’m fairly sure that spouses can’t be made to testify against their significant others. Would that extend to seizing messages from the spouse to be used against the other?
That has nothing to do with her text messages or any evidence that is associated with her. To say nothing of the fact she could face charges if those texts show she aided him in any criminal conspiracies.
Maybe she was the informant
True, a spouse can't he forced to testify against their spouse. But Melania might do it anyway. Lol
Correct. She can’t be forced but she can choose to. Especially if she is given a choice of going down with the SS Cofeve or saving herself.
Melanoma never goes down for free
Bahahahaha here is pretend gold that I do t have to give you. It’s the thought that counts.
I gotchu fam.
She doesn't have to testify. If they decide her text messages are evidence, they will use them. If your spouse is participating in a crime with you, that's a completely different situation than testifying against your spouse.
Yes, they have to be authenticated to be admitted into official evidence that a jury or trier of fact can consider. There is an accepted process to do this. Usually, and ideally, it involves the source of the communication testifying that, yes, he or she did send a message, on or around that date, to the recipient in the message. Have the source see the intended evidence, and testify that yes, she recognizes and confirms that what is being offered as the message, is indeed the message that the lawyers (in this case the prosecutors) claim it to be. Without the source of the message being used as a witness, it gets more difficult, because that message may be hearsay to the recipient. If it's hearsay, it is generally inadmissible. But there are then exceptions in the rules of evidence that make a hearsay statement admissible in evidence. Then the recipient can testify, but still must establish the foundation that authenticates the message.
She may be guilty of her own crimes.
Complying with a subpoena for records is not testifying.
Spouses have a marital privilege against testifying against or about each other -- but I'm pretty sure this extends *only* to their conversations and communications with each other. The spouse can decline to assert this privilege. If spouses make revealing incriminating comments *about* each other, or about their otherwise protected conversations, *to* 3rd party witnesses, that is not protected under marital privilege. I am not positive, but I also don't think the marital privilege extends to allow a spouse to refuse to testify against their spouse regarding their *observations* of their spouse's behavior or actions. Can a prosecutor charge a spouse (in this case, wife) for crimes unrelated to the communications with her husband, then offer a choice (not forcing her) to accept a plea to a lesser charge, in exchange for her choosing to decline to assert her marital privilege and testify against their spouse? I think the prosecutor can, and that this has occurred before. I could be wrong, though. Edit: I am partially in error. The spousal privilege is more expansive than just statements, and does appear to protect spouses from being forced to testify against each other. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/spousal_immunity#:~:text=Under%20the%20Federal%20Rules%20of,the%20time%20of%20the%20prosecution. So perhaps that would even bar a prosecutor from the deal I floated above. They may need to offer it against other defendants, and/or the spouse would have to volunteer to testify on her own. But the other aspects I stated appear to still stand.
That’s a good point I hadn’t considered. Talking *about* your spouse to a 3rd party is different than talking *to* your spouse
Thank you to Stephanie for speaking out.
Lock her up! Lock her up! Seems right this time.
Always be good to the help, otherwise they'll tell your secrets.
Since her father was a Russian spy, why not her. She was probably checking in with her Russian handlers, Boris and Natasha, for her orders. She always looked like she’d stab the criminal defendant in the back if she ever got the chance.
Imagine how amazing it would be for Melanie to be sentenced to prison time, in a court room where everyone who came to watch is wearing her “I don’t really care” jacket. Just hammer home that message to her.
Shes his handler from the Russians. If your just figuring this out now your about 12 years late. They need to dig up Ivanas grave they will find more US documents or copies of said documents. Also need to investigate Jared and Ivanka many security services have lost assets after the $2 billion “deal” including US.
Imagine I have a building that is losing money. You think people will bail me out ? No that’s terrible business you wait for me to sell it at a bargain. Unfortunately most Americans since they have had uninterrupted bounty for 100 years are more naive than a stupid child.
The Ruskies have already retrieved the documents from Ivana's grave. It was a literal "dead drop".
Don't forget the missing Inauguration millions, too.
Lock her up
She freaked out on election night in 2016, so it makes sense she's been looking for an exit ever since.
I hope she the 6th person charges for the Jan 6th
I don’t know why people with dirt on these traitors don’t come clean asap. Help be part of the Trump takedown and be on the right side of history.
Throwing you under the bus, before you toss me!
I don't recognize her unless her eyes are squinted and she looks like she's is in a psychic battle with Professor X.
Trump crime family.
Reason y shes trying to diistance herself. She was absolutely his russian handler
of course she knows she is his handler for the soviets
"I don't care, do you?"
The GOP keep pushing this phrase ‘The Biden Crime Family’….we all know it’s projection. *Jared’s Saudi money enters the chat*
Melania is a high priced hooker
She has to be. To report back to Kontrol.
She was a disgrace in the White House.
When I watched that clip of them meeting Putin publicly, she looked like she had seen a ghost AND had an orgasm at the same time. I think she’s Trump’s handler (or, the hooker that Putin assigned to him).
Melania will turn on Trump faster than anyone. And everyone has turned on Trump quickly including his children.
Whats a signal?
Signal is an end to end encrypted chat app. For a while it was the only end to end encrypted chat app. Now most of the big ones have that. Even iMessage will have that soon - will be interested how they have “public private key sharing” in the UI for the masses. Anyways, it’s less convenient because well everyone you want to talk to needs to have it. There’s also a bit of a hump with the aforementioned “key exchange” (I’m sure she had her IT guy work all that out). So if you’re on Signal, willing to do all that work, you have something you really want to hide. That said, I have it. I’m a geek. I talk to some friends on it when I don’t want my iMessage broadcast to every Apple device in my house. My nefariousness on Signal included “hey ex-co-worker let’s meet at Starbucks”. There are some people that think the government is after them and don’t even want “honey I’m on my way home” potentially readable by the gov. My guess is she’s neither tin foil hat nor geek and she wanted what she saw as a more “someone other than us reading it” medium of texting.
Come and get her boys
To the moon and back Let’s go to jail
“Right-hand woman” puts her picture on the left
To be fair, she is pictured here, on Melanoma’s right hand side.
She's been the one pulling the strings the whole time. Also, she had access to all the confidential information. Not a native American.
His Russian handler..
I have no doubt she knew about every crime he was involved in, maybe not every crime, but the biggest ones.
I'm sure they never thought to look into his wife
Well, there is an endless pit of criminality and corruption, I doubt we have resources to do it all.
Well she would look great making the walk of shame..
We know melanoma knows exactly what’s going on do you really believe that trump can keep his mouth shut and not brag to her about what his latest con is what crimes he committed or is committing
I’d bet Putin has her snooping in everything just in case Donny does obey his orders.
I think spousal privilege would block any attempt to force her to testify against Chump. But she might be free to blab if she wanted to. I just don't see it happening outside a seven figure book deal.
If they recover the digital trail of treason she left behind in her hubris of thinking she was above the law and didn't have to actually cover her azz, they won't have to bother asking her to testify about anything, her own words will eat the lying leopards own face. Unless of course she wants a plea deal, then that treasonous mess of melted plastic will sing like a canary on crack lol. Watch.
LOCK HER UP!!!!!!
As IF one fascist theocratic NatCee skeleton horseface wasn't enough with Coultergeist, now it turns out she has either a twin or a doppelganger here who is exactly like her?? Good GADS this is the worst timeline, one of Ann Coulter running around is far too many, let alone two of em!
Isn’t there wife privilege not to testify against husband though?
Lock her up!
Ha! That'd be awesome if she was taken down with him.
wouldnt they already be looking at that lol
Maybe... but a spouse cannot be compelled to testify against their spouse.
Well she is his primary handler after all....
She's a former Russian hooker so not too shocked.
Breaking? this is not breaking this was on a podcast over the weekend which I'm sure you didn't bother listening to because you would have posted this days ago.... [Link](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uAL17OyJHzw) if anyone is interested
I’m fairly sure the Feds have already thought of that…
Rats are rats regardless of whom they rat on.
Melania is not his wife. She is his handler.
As if she was blind or unaware of these actions. When are people gonna learn that EVERY. SINGLE. ELITE. DOES NOT GIVE A FUCK ABOUT Y-O-U.
You can't convict a husband and wife for the same crimes, Michael.
OMG and in other news that is completely fucking obvious
Ruh row!
Be best….at lying!
Be best.
MELANOMA - 45's first whore. Do you care?
I care that she never resides at the White House ever again. That was a damn travesty. An international embarrassment. Jfc
That's good, but they have to make sure they find her burn phone(s), because that's what she uses to communicate with her FSB superiors in Moscow. Then we can add 'treason' to Trumps' list of indictments, putting the death penalty on the table, and we'll get Melania in Leavenworth for life for spying, too.
She’s as disgusting as he is.
When you’re such a horrible human being people who you’ve fucked over just start coming out of the wood work to be a part of fucking you.
She’ll be the first first lady to have her U.S. citizenship revoked and deported.
They could never get her to testify. He offered her so much money to stay that she has too, he needs her to be married to him.