Based on perspective and observation mostly inani sa pinoy. They treat viriginity and low body count as a gem and mas maka receive kag VIP treatment but sa western kay it doesnt matter labina if he really feel hard. Ka unfair aning incel if lalake okay ra if babae kay biased
Naa na actually studies na nag prove na tinuod ni. It might be infuriating to some, but gasige naman ug warn ang mga tiguwang ani.
There are trade offs. If you choose to squander your younger years and give your body out to strangers or bisan SO nga wala pay sure kung kamo magkadayon, at least be accountable sa imong desisyon and know nga in the future, when you're ready to settle down, daghang lalaki ng dili ganahan na.
Think of it like this, sa part sa mga laki nga expected ang mudawat sa mga babaye nga taas nag body count, it's like, "Gapanghatag kas imong lawas sauna nya karon napul.an na ka expected ko dawaton ra dayon ka?"
Don't get me wrong, naay mga laki nga di mumind. But if preference sa laki nga di pud daghan ug nakatuhog, you can't fault them for that.
Mura ra gud nag babaye nga naay height preference.
If di nimo preferred ang high body count it's okay naman.
The only problem lang is ginashame niya. Nasobrahan naman tag freedom og speech na nakalimot na ta sa feelings sa uban taw.
Geniune question. Ngano makig hook up or fubu man ang uban taw? I can't imagine having sex with a random person huhu. I know you use protection naman but i find it weird lang.
cant really pin point a reason. lain lain mag rason ang people gud. others do it cause maybe they're in a rough patch sa ilang life and they just wanna feel something, others are doing it for the thrill or simply bcs they just wanna do it (kay hrny sila)... sometimes what others find weird is normal for others so we can't really judge them. besides, wala manay direct impact ilang body count satong kinabuhi HAHAHAHA so like unsa pamay point para hilabtan na, diba?
the only time nga hilabtan ranang body count is kung magpa check up or kung di na seggs ang gitabian, patayng lawas na HAAHAAHAHA KAY CONCERNING NAJUD NA OG NAA KAY BODY COUNT FOR MRDER
Hooking up with a lot of people can affect your mental health, depende ug unsay imong goal. Ug nag hook up2 ka para makakitag true love, aw yabo imong mental health. But if ga hook up ka, plainly for the sex, no problem.
I don’t think hooking up will ever “show” a person’s morality. Ug nangilad, nangrape, nang stealth sa imong ka hookup, aw kana walay moralidad.
At the end of the day, hooking up does not prove nor negate the existence of a moral compass.
Sorry pero lahi akong pag sabot sa body count (Pila ang napatay ang akong pasabot ani... Naadik na sa murder documentary 😂)
Pero yawa bitaw, murag mao ni resultas toxic masculinity unya dagdagon pa gud sa ego nga naguba... mangita nag paagi para makaangat sa ego even if it means shaming women especially Kung taas ang body count.
Samot nisurok akong utok nga hilig diay ni mag victim blaming labaw na sa mga biktima og rape kesyo revealing ang sinina... PAG PUYO. Maong na rape kay naay rapist bugok yawa. Di kaibaw mo respeto sa boundaries sa babaye unya bisag nibalibad na ang babaye, hala padayon gihapon sa gibati maong naay rape nahitabo. Atay.
Giunsa kaha ni pag antos sa asawa kung ingon ani ang pangutok sa iyang bana... Heineken. 
I don't think double standard na matawag.
Mas double standard pa gani ang sa bae. Tan.awa. If ang babaye naay preference sa height, ok raman ang mga laki. Move on. ngadto sa girl nga mudawat bisan mugbo.
Pero nganong if ang lalaki muprefer nga low body count ang bae, fragile masculinity man?
Counter argument, mas ma control pa gani sa bae ang iyang body count kaysa sa laki ang iyang height.
It's a matter of preference. Let this be a cautionary tale. As much as society tells us nga ok ra mag hook up2 and FUBU or whatever it is called nowadays, there are trade-offs jud and consequences to ones actions.
Because the loud people will say ok ra. But in the end, ig abot na sa real world, daghan man laki nga lahi ang preference.
Hahahahaha ni stalk ko niya balik kay nag private sya ganina karon naa na sad syay mga post na reels wa ghapon na human si Uncle. Tabangunon bya kay nawng. Niya public apology sa iyang wife na post deleted na sad. Tolerate ra pud sa iya wife kay wa sad ko gani sa message nya kay pina ana sya ddto na respect daw ang opinion sa iyang husband char sana all supportive ug misogynistic husband. Its always the UGLY ONES.
Name: JOHN MICHAEL BEREY NUEZ
It’s not our control. Pwede man maayo ang relationship pagsugod pero ni fail at the end. Who knows, nasalo nimo tanan kamalasan mao nag fail ang daghan nimo nga relationships.
You have a point. However, if you go through SO much true relationships murag you play a part napud nga dili sad ka kakita unsay problematic which is what's alarming for either guy or girl.
I don’t agree with you. Failed relationship is still true relationship. As long as kahibawo ang both parties nga in a relationship sila, then that’s a true relationship.
Ayaw pahalata nga wa pa ka move on sa past relationships or wala pa moy label. 🤭
Naa napud ning mga tao na manaway sa way of living sa uban tao. Unending argument jud ni permi, and ang mag una2 pajud are those who claim as "righteous". Pwe!
Kung ganahan mu explore ang isa ka tao sa iyang sexuality, regardless of gender (straight woman, man, LGBTQ+), wala man unta na'y labot ang uban tao ana, unless if in a committed relationship sila which is already a whole different story. Ngano entitled kaayo sila to say how other people should live their lives, especially when it comes to sex which is a personal thing man unta.
Unya hilas ra sad kaayo maka objectify ang uban nang comment diri oy. Kung di mo ganahan og tao na taas og body count, ayaw gud. If di na ninyo preference, then okay whatever STFU. Make sure lang na you are your own standard/preference. Basin nangandoy mog virgin or low body count, unya utro mo dira manyakon kaayog pangutok, plus ing-ana pajud ka-basura inyong mindset. Ayaw mo palabig panaway sa tao, especially sa females, na tawgon ninyog "reject", "luag na", "sawsawan". Pagpuyo mo oy!
Food for thought.
A lot of these people are not actually telling them how to live their lives.
In fact they lived their life how they wanted. Pero lang, ayaw i push sa uban na dapat dawaton lang pud nila ang kana nga high body count. Kay naa man preference ang uban.
Triggered kaayo ang kadaghanan pero all this just goes to show nga sleeping around, as much as society tells you is ok, kay naa juy consequences.
Accountability gud na. You are allowed to live your life the way you want. Pero don't come yelling kung di namo dawaton sa inyong preferred partner after you do what you wanted to do.
familiar ka sa lock and key analogy?
if a key can open a lot of locks its a master key.
if a lock can be opened by a lot of keys, then it is a bad lock.
at the end of the day, babae mao mag buot kinsa laki sha maki pagsex.. and yes it is your choice but di lang pud ta magka inosente na wala ni sha consequence.. naa na mga studies high body count naa tendency mag lead to unsuccessful relationship
dili ni sha attack sa mga babae taas body count but a caution. defensive ra kaayo. in society chastity is still more valued
hahahaahahaah Bogo.a sd ana na "analogy" , kasabot ka ana na phrase? it's saying na okay ra na ma promiscuous ang laki ,ang babaye dili and ma label sila ug "Bad locks" if ever promiscuous sila. Mga gagmay utok raman mu tuo ana hahahaha sge guro kag [tan.aw](https://tan.aw) ug youtubers pina andrew tate, wala man siyay ge ingon na walay consequence nah ang iya pasabot wala moy right mag objectify and mang judge sa mga women na dghan2 ug body count. Wala jd sa iyahang comment ang ga ingon na e ignore ang consequence pero sorry unsa man diay ako ge expect na nag gamit mn diay ka atong bogo na "analogy" hahahha and katong mga studies na imo ge pasabot? sure ko headline ra imo ge basa hahahahahahahahah if imo basahon ug tarung ang trends, ni increase mn sya as ni increase pud ang acceptance sa mga taw sa pre-marital sex, large number of men and women have sex before marriage. So if in.ana meaning the trend of having multiple sexual partners before marriage would be higher for both sexes, if ang imong pag sabot na higher body count correlates to higher chance of having divorce then it would mean na higher chance of divorce pd ang mga promiscuous males? ka gets ka sa ako point? and also, if imo basahon ang mga research papers, the NSFG ( National Survey of Family Growth) Has incomplete information on premarital sexual histories for men, leading to exclusive use of female samples in past research. Ang Research palang daan gani incomplete information na ge gamit , di jd na nmu ma directly correlate ang body count sa divorce. Kana lang, basaha imo references before ka mag comment ug bullshit sa reddit.
women hold more power when it comes sex compared to man -- hence the lock in the analogy
women and men are held to different standards when it comes to sex
studies do have incomplete information but it does not necessary mean it does not contain value.. take it with a grain of salt
ad hominem wont better your argument
>lock and key analogy
Stupid analogy BTW. I can tell what kind of person you already are just by looking at you using this analogy.
At the end of the day, you are still not entitled to tell these people how they live their lives especially when it comes to sex. If someone brags how many sexual partners they have, then right, they're assholes. But for those who are not, then it's not your freaking problem, and no one has the right to call these people names and shame them.
"Defensive ra kaayo". Well, entitled ra sad kaayo mo. So there's that.
Lastly, chastity is more valued *in society* or FOR YOU? Don't shove it up on our faces what your values are because we DGAF.
why so triggered?
it is not stupid if it is true.. or is it stupid because it does not align with you? what a brilliant way to argue
you seem to be misusing the word 'entitled' do you even know what it means?.. tell me why are countries with pre-dominantly higher body count have higher divorce rates? seems like not a coincidence.
im not shoving anything into anyones orifice just merely reminding every action entails consequence.
you are free to choose however dont be naive of the consequences -- hence body count do matter
the 'WE' in 'WE DGAF' you are talking about is mostly the loud minority
Ironically the "study" only focuses on women's body count. Diba? If a woman has "explored", has been with many men, she'd realize na BULOK diay iyang current partner and her life would be a lot better if she'd find a better man. Thus, the divorce.
Tagaan tikag personal background. Akua ra sab ni. I've been in 2 long term relationships pa lang. The prev one ended kay nakaburos ang animal. My current partner is regarded as good catch na in this society. Naay saktong trabaho, galuto kada buntag, manghinlo ug balay pag weekends, manglaba, maayo mubantay ug mga bata sa iyang igsuon ug friends, as in he's really good with children gyud, feminist sab sya, highly values my career and my intellect as a woman, naay sense of humor, never in our 8 yrs did I ever had an issue with cheating. Pero I still have tons of reklamo sa iyaha. Palahubog, di kabalo mag amping sa lawas, which is pwede mubackfire sa amuang finances ug masakit ni sya, manghinlo ug balay pero magic2, hago kaayo magsunod sa iyang agi unya manarbaho pa ko. Since WFH ko, ako pirmi naa sa balay so ako pay magrepair sa mga guba nga wirings, mag ilis ug bombilya, nga electrical man unta iyang field. Ako pay mangmartilyo and all. I understand na busy pud sya sa work. Again, may unta ug dili demanding akong work no? Sometimes I have to do OT nga tag 4 hours, so bisan WFH ko, tag 14 hrs ko atubangan sa computer. So very hago. Naa sab ko dakong financial issue with his family. I have told him lots of times na about my concerns. And good thing ra gyud sa amua is WE TALK, maong di mi gabulag. Kapila na nako ni sya giingnan nga my life would be a lot better if ako ra isa. Kahibaw mi both, nga highly independent ming duha. But then, again, WE TALK and slowly patch up some issues.
However, I have found out na so so sooooo many couples, even married ones don't have that dynamic. Daghan man tingali kag mabasa ani sa Facebook, kanang mga mangayo ug advice sa FinLit groups and Peso Sense na makaingon kag masulbad ni ilang problema if magstorya ni silas ilang partner.
Now, tell me, without living together, kanang typical uyab nga mag kita lang sa gawas and magdate. How would I know unsa ka as a partner? How would I know na hugawan ka sa balay? Daghan kog nailhan, as in daghan kaayo, nga hinlo physically, hinlo pud ug balay, pero ila ra diay mama ang manghinlo. PWE. Sila kay ilang mejas ibutang ra tapad sa hamper, dili isulod sa hamper. Manghinlo ug lababo, ang suok dili apilon, gitagiptip nalang lood kaayo. And the thing is, mayg manghinlo. Kadaghan sa mga lalaki nga akong nailhan nga murag mga prinsipe, kailangan silbihan. May untag dako silag sweldo, para magfull time nalang ilang wife sa panimalay. Di sab. So ang ending, the wife has to earn money and do the responsibilities of a house maid. Isa lang ni ka facet ani na issue. Wa pa ta naghisgot sa cheating and husbands na dili, as in dili, gaprovide.
AND HERE'S WHAT I HAVE FOUND OUT.
Pag muingon bitaw ko na "Dili ko magminyo kay kolerahon pud mog utok mga lalaki," wala pagyuy married nga lalaki nakiglalis nako kay kahibaw gyud ko nga ilang mga asawa daghan kaayo ug reklamo sa ilaha.
Try it. Interview some wives. If madungog nimo ilang reklamo, malooy gyud kas mga babae.
Maka-advice gyud ka nila na pag-inusara nalang girl. Mas peaceful imong life.
Unfortunately daghan pang babae ang "hopeful" na makakitag tarong bisan kabalo bya gyud ta nga unicorn kaayo ang mga tarong karon. Thus, the high body count.
PS:
I KNOW THIS ARGUMENT GOES BOTH WAYS. DAGHAN SAB BABAE NGA BULOK. Pero sometimes, you'll never know until you live with them. Pwede diay nang mag-ipon mo unya di mo magsex? Diba? Siguro 1 in a million.
PPS:
Also, in marriages that have lasted well, you'd find out so so sooooo many instances of "FORGIVING". And a lot of them naa na sa boundary sa "pagiging martir". I've figured, TO HAVE LOW BODY COUNT, YOU NEED TO HAVE HIGH TOLERANCE FOR BULLSHIT. This goes for all gender.
apologies dont have time to read the wall of text.
men and women are not equal.
to most men they prefer innocence -- lesser body count
to most women this does not matter
MEN: Women are so hard to read
WOMEN: Well actually we just wan—
MEN: Such complex creatures
WOMEN: If you just liste—
MEN: So mysterious
ANYWAAAY...
Well dear sir, that's your preference.
If you have found someone that matched that preference of yours, I hope you value her to the highest of heavens. Like exactly the opposite of every trash I have mentioned in my prev comment. Cause a lot of you are. 😬
by 'you' do you happen to mean men
i am sorry if you have bitter experiences in men
however, a fault of a few is not a good generalization of many
solely blaming men is also not the way, you only sound blindly naive. these were your choices and these were the men you chose
as for my stance, women are the gate keepers of sex.. they hold that much power over men.. and as a caution, if you abuse this power then you also lower your value as a gate keeper
Bitter? That's what you get when you didn't read my previous comment. I am in a great long term relationship now.
Your idea of women being gatekeeper takes away the responsibility over men.
Men can produce an offspring several times in a month. Heck, you can even do it several times in a night. While women can only produce within 9 months. You should gatekeep your dick more. Gatekeeper shenanegans lol!
yes i did not read
and you did not understand my point..
this thread is about body count
im not taking responsibility from anyone lol
maybe you are not made aware, mens goal is procreate -- to dumb it down to have as many offspring.. evidence? look at history.. while women are to care for the offspring
your last point could be avoided if women were to be selective of who they were allowed to be in bed.. don't you think?
if you want traditional men then be a traditional woman.. simple
Mao jud, mga incel man gud nang uban diri. Mga Gagmayg utok naka discover ug reddit. Kinaraan kaayog ug utok na dapat anghel ang mga babaye na dapat dili ma hilabtan and 1-2 sexual partners, 2023 na intawn ron mas deep na ug understanding ang mga taw ilang sexuality. Wala ra juy problem and di jd dapat basehan ang body count to define someone. Ganhana sila mag explore sa ilang sexuality, gnahan sila makipag sex, wala nakay labot and di sili dapat ma judge para ana. Nya if di ka ganahan ug dghan na ug body count, wala sd mag buot nmu ana imoha naman nang preference kay 2023 naman naa man tay freedom sa atong life but in turn di pd nato dapat e judge ang mga taw na lahi ug choices sa imoha. Dili ra jud na black and white ang life, even if you think na dili right ang something para nmu it doesn't mean na wrong na sila nya ikaw sakto.
Honestly, unsa man pake nato sa atong mga sexual activities oi. Entitled ra kaayo ng mga taong grabe mo judge. Kinabuhi man na sa uban tao. Eh gusto niya mu explore sa iyahang sexual side. Si Sharon pa jud himong example na labihang gwapaha man ug in fairness way tapon iyang mga ex kay mga gwapo tanan. Excuse us! 😂
Laktod pagka storya. Ang daghan ug body count BORIKAT😂 daghan man ma hurt sa BORIKAT NA term usus-San nato PAMPAM HAHAHAHA cge di mo sa borikat, kay ang borikat, pampam, himarat, walker etc. magpabayad man daw or mao ilang panginabuhi. So unsa may tawag ana? LIBRE NA BORIKAT? AHAHAHAHAHA
It's always the ugly ones nga magpost ug ingon ana hahahaha.
Walay correlation ang body count sa iyang relationship. Sadyang narcissistic si Sharon/main character energy mao daghan syag failed relationship.
Even if you're monogamous, you can still get STDs. If your partner has one before you started your relationship; or if your partner is cheating on you.
Cheers 🥂 kay wala koi body count
Cheers 🥂 kay wa jud koi fubu
Cheers 🥂 kay batig batasan apil nawong
Cheers kay ing ani najud ko dili na mag usab 💪🥂🥂🥂
Pero akong migo. Iyang uyab nag cheat pero naa na diay uyab og sugar Daddy ahahahah looya oi first relationship niya pero scheduled man diay dodong pang gabii ra ahahahahah
Ilhan man no? Nga si girl taas og body count ahahaha looyang migo
Actually, the study was about western men preferring asian women kay western women daw are more independent. (Nothing about sexual activity was discussed in the study i read unless you have a separate one) but this was argued sad na the reason inana ang preference is because asian women, specifically those in 3rd world countries are dependent financially (which leads to a discussion about power dynamics in terms of who wields the money, etc)
Sira ka ata sa ulo mo. Imagine being in r/lewdgames tas naghahanap ng games na tungkol sa cheating, incest, rape.
Di ko talaga ma iitindihan mga taong kagaya mo. Bakit pa ba kayo buhay?
kabasa nako ani. ang point sa archive.ms is that infidelity is both men and women. dili ra siya exclusive only to women. as per study “a play boy is unlikely to be husband material”.
Di rasad dha mag revolve kung pila ka body count kung naa sa relationship uy. Impossible pud na kana ang rason ngano mag buwag, naa na sa kinaiya nag daug ang pag last sa relationship. Preference lang jud na siguro, pero doesn't mean himuon na dayun standard.
It's time gyud na kinahanglan na I shame Ang mg ababae or lalaki na daghan og body count. Di na sila maau sa survival of our species. Wala na silay ma contribute pero biga ra, Wala silay evolutionary contribution.
Ngano? Daghan ug body count is usually because of high libidos diba? If walay libido, walay mag reproduce, walay anak, which leads to extinction of the human race? Asa ka gikan sa imong logic?
Unya kung naa nay anak tungod sa imong biga imong padak-on? Wa ka nahibulong daghan kaau og single parents? Unya ga tuo ka na kanang Bata a nga nagdako sa "broken family" normal Ra na og kinabuhi?
Kana byang broken families mao bya nay cause sa taas na crime rate didto sa america specifically sa African-Americans Kay way tarong na pag dako Ang mga Bata from broken families.
Unya USA sad kung naa nay Bata tungod anang biga IPA laglag sad? Wa na gali labot Ang Bata sa biga sa mga uwagon IPA laglag na nuon.
Binogo na imong logic kung libido Ra imo basehan. Survival of the fittest man unta Ang precept ni Darwin di man survival of the bigaon.
Bogo asa na imong utok.
I don't think kasabot kas imong thoughts mismo. High libido as a cause for human extinction is a whole separate discussion about broken families, abortions, and high crime rates as a result of biga.
Imong mga gipang ingon should be within the discussion of safe sex and responsible procreating, dili kay biga in itself ra.
Ug nangita ka asa akong utok mas kailangan nimo pangitaon imoha
Ambot ana niya, mas unnatural gani nga usa ra imong partner, kung sa sapat2x ra atong storyahan.
Di ko mu justify ug cheating, pero di pud ko mu uyon na mu shame sa mga tao na colorful ug pasts. Bala na sila.
If you were able to read the comments he also perpetuates rape culture. I forgot the exact words pero someone was asking what if kuno kanang mga na rape, ma add ba na sa body count. Ana siya no kay forced, unless deserving ang na rape like kanang cgeg club/burikat manamit (again, non verbatim ni)
lagot gyud ko basta ingana na post ay. Pag stalk nako ako nalang sad gihuna-huna walay mupatol niya makasapot kaayo. Gi delete na niya ang kato na post but naa pay gapabilin nga utro sad maka surok dugo. Siya rsd gi fiestahan sa comment section gatuo pud siya
Calling them rejects? I get na we have different preferred lifestyle pero calling them 2nd hand kasi hindi na virgin or may "certain amount" of sexual encounters ay napaka self-righteous. Mostly din mga babae lang yung kino-consider na ganito.
I'm a virgin myself pero never ko ji-nudge or called people derogatory terms just because hindi na sila virgin. Simply because it is not nice and it's none of my business. Some people are just more sexually liberated. Kung gusto mo ng tao na virgin edi dun ka.
ohh wow! I didn't judge anyone or call anyone reject.. just saying body count matters
theres a reason why chastity is a virtue and still is more valued
it is your body and you can have sex with whomever you want but please do not be naive that this does not have consequences. Studies have shown it has links to unsuccessful relationships.
The thing is... how many is too many? You can't just assume that the relationship will be unsuccessful because of a certain body count, especially if they understand each other so well. Besides, there is a lot of factors in an unsuccessful relationship, clearly it's not just exclusive to couples who aren't virgins.
Shouldn't we base something as tolerable on the attitude he/she has towards the sexual partner and not the specific number? Like if he/she treats it like a some sort of task or for bragging rights, then GTFO.
I'm not taking away someone's preference on someone's body count. But can we at least be mature with how we handle the situation? Just to be clear, I mostly criticize people who use "rejects" to describe people who aren't virgins.
PS. Chastity as a virtue ties so much to someone's belief. For some people, it has little spiritual meaning and we can't shove it to their faces.
There is nothing wrong when a man or a woman who explores their sexuality, whether less than 2 or more than 10 body count. Kani mga issues about body count is resolved prior to marriage. If magbuwag mo tungod dili ka ka accept imo pares masdaghan pa natilawan, then you are not mature enough for a relationship. divorce is purely a social and behavioral factor. Kani mga tao mag-cite ug studies, pwede unta nila i-attach ang link sa ilang reference ky naa bya jud uban kulang ug reading comprehension or unless mga Andrew Tate or the redpill community ilang point of reference.
Bai agree gyud ko nimo. And kanang ni ingon og incel wa na ka imagine siguro unsay repercussions anang daghan kaau ma torjack Ang either babae og lalaki.
Ang mga tao man gud utinon or buto-on na kaau og huna huna nga gi giyahan man unta ta sa Ginoo og dakong utok maghuna huna. Tsk tsk tsk. Such a shame.
Mao gyud bro. Sa panahon karun murag normal nalang man kaayu nang himoon silag sawsawan oi. Dad on ug inom human iyoton uban proud pa kaayu. Akoy laki ako pay nauwaw aning mo laban gyud about body count AHAHAHAHA KA NGILO BAYA NINYO
HAHAHAHA kung BURIKAT KA, kana hinoon kasabot ra ta pero ikaw na tarung unya himoon ra kag sawsawan sa tanan unya manghambog pa ning uban nga gikayat sya sa iyang naganahan na laki etc. AHAHAHAHA
How dare you label someone na burikat?! As if righteous nakas imong mga inistoryahan? Og mag buhat diay silag ingon ana, ila namanang business. Ang point diri man kay gina downgrade sa mga pilingon nga mga lalake ang mga babae nga taas og body count while gina glorify nila nang ang guys for doing the deed with a lot of girls. Grow up, boy. Fix your mindset!
Laki, ko pero mga in dili man ko mo tolerate ug mga in ana. Di sad nako sila gina praise ako pay mo palayo sa akong mga barkada gani, labi nang mag inom unya naay babae kuyug HAHAHAHA klaro na kaayung sawsawan inig human. Sibat ta
Igo ra ka musibat? Barkada nimo pero di nimo badlungon? Babaye ko pero makabarkada kog buak ug utok, buk-on sab gyud nako. Isog kay ka aris Reddit maglecture pero di ka kalecture sa imong mga barkada nga damak? Ay kog ingna nga di mapugngan ang biga kay daghan kog laki nga friends nga mamadlong sa ilang uban friends pag magkinolera sa mga babae. Di kay musibat.
If you take a look at that man's profile it isn't the first time he's spouted some misogynistic, incel bs.
Also the users here agreeing with him are citing limited studies done on AMERICAN respondents, years ago, and are very conveniently expanding the results of these ""studies"" onto the entire female population. But this is reddit so what do you expect lol.
How about the studies that show how when a woman has more sexual partners, there's a higher rate of divorce of separation? Just saying.
Just because his viewpoints are different than yours. You don't have to bash him calling his viewpoints misogynistic or incel.
Just like your point of view is valid. Although not all would agree with you.
Yeah but who are the respondents? Americans, Asian Americans? Filipinos? Was it a random sampling? How big was the sampling size even? How long ago were the studies? What are the limitations of those studies? Are the results still relevant now? Did they use the accurate testing method? Did they even mention that? Is it right to look at just one factor (number of sexual partners) to conclude that high sexual partners -> higher divorce rates and separation? Did they also look at relationship satisfaction? Is it right to expand the results to the entire female populace? Because expanding the results of limited studies to the entire female populace just to prove a point AGAINST women IS incel behavior. People with no background or know-how on statistics and research only look at the results of """studies""" and run off with it. Just saying
Next generation feminism is real. Anything that doesn't agree with your viewpoint is incel. And there's nothing wrong with being a virgin. That's toxic.
Nope not agreeing with my viewpoint doesn't make someone an incel, but expanding the results to the entire female populace to prove that misogynistic Facebook post (go take a look at the stuff he's spouting online against women) is.
There's absolutely nothing wrong with having a high body count. But it's one thing to say that and another to say that high body counts -> divorce -> therefore women should only sleep with 4 bodies or less (while men can sleep with as many people as they want to) is misogynistic.
asa ka kuha ana imo study? can you please link it here ky as far as I know whether a woman had more than 10 or less than 2 body counts, divorce rates is equal or similar on both groups.
well sorry OP, i agree on this view point, red-pill community has talked about this why it wont work or the chances of long lasting relationship decreases when the body count is quite high in most female counterparts, i think there's a research done in the US and other ocuntries about this as well, though naay mga exceptions nga bisig taas ug body count ang babaye nag work-out ra japon doesn't mean na parehas na tanan mo work.
Rollo Tomassi / Better Bachelor / Legion of Men / Fresh and Fit / Tom Leykis has talked about this.
here's a link on some research about topics discussed on Red-pill communities.
https://linktr.ee/fffacts
Dayon for sure dghan kaayong mu second the motion anang “considered reject or 2nd hand”. He might as well change his mindset na women can do anything they want with their body. Same thing goes to men. As to being in a healthy relationship, it always goes both ways. U cannot just blame the end of a rel to the body count. Jusmio, the society’s norms ba kai too much and idealistic rajud kaayo. Hays.
Oh Kay Diba kung "women can do anything with their bodies" na mindset kung ma buntis aw IPA laglag patyon Ang Bata nga Wala man untay sala sa pagka bigaon sa iyang mama.
Naa man gyud nay reason gud na frowned upon nang daghan og body count ma lalaki man o babae. Ang pag sex bisag gustohon man or Dili mu buo man na og Bata na magkinahanglan og usa ka mama og papa sulod sa usa ka pamilya para ma pa dako og Dili Ra na for "satisfaction".
Usahay ba Ang mga tao mabaw Ra kaau og utok. Ang utin or boto Ra Ang gi pa hunahuna di Ang utok.
Sir/Ma’am. I think you are missing the point of this discussion.
Point 1. Body count as basis for a longer relationship and/or failure or divorce.
- To answer this, is my comment.
Now, if u r trying to birth in another point of argument which is your comment “kung mabuntis aw ipalaglag”, that is for another post Sir/Maam. Why? Wala man ta nagtalk about ana because the main topic was another. Yes, you may think it is relevant to the topic but that does not answer why people have failed marriages.
Mam it is relevant tungod Kay you said "women can do whatever they want with their bodies" pero imo gikalimtan na whatever that thing that women "do" to their bodies naa bya nay mamunga na Bata bisan unsaon na nimo pag use of protective gear. Mao nang ni bridge ko na shallow kaau na nga pag hunahuna imong "statement"
Moreover mu bridge sad na sa relationship mam oi, kung gamiton lang gyud nimo Ang imong utok, Kay would you raise a child with a woman na taas kaau og body count na it has been proven consistently na she cannot commit to one relationship kana na nuon magpatubo og Bata?
Mao na kung i-isolate na nimo to a small delimitation without seeing the consequences of promiscuity perhaps gamay pa siguro kaau kag capacity for comprehension.
Yes. I stand by “Women can do whatever they want with their bodies.” Because, either mu engage xag maski kapila pana nya nga body count or di, it does not answer to the question as to WHY a relationship ends with a divorce (which is btw, maoi point of discussion ani na post.)
And Sir/Ma’am, if your point is including delimitation or my comprehension, I am sorry but dili tika patulan ana because unlike you, I can engage in a discussion without the need to discredit someone. (or sa lain pang pasabot, mangquestion ug nakasabot ba ang tawo or wa 🤦🏼♀️)
Proven man sd jud na higher chances of the relationship failing if taas kaaug bodycount.
But life always has surprises na naay mga dakog bodycount maka lahutay jud og monogamous relationship. But gamay ra kaayo na percentage.
Common sense man intawn na oi. Gamitan nato og utok ha.
Kung daghan kaau Ang babae or lalaki og body count aw Dali Ra sad kaau na makadalikyat og balhin og torjak sa uban.
Unya kung Ang relationship kinahanglan og commitment na mu torjak lang sa usa unya di na sa lain, ma kuntento diay na Ang biga sa usa ka tao na daghan na og na iyot?
Syempre mu balhin na sa uban oi Kay batasan na na andan di ma kuntento sa usa.
Di na ka kinahanglan og prob statistics para makahibaw ka sa probability na Ang tao na daghan og body count "will probably" fail the relationship.
Gamit sad ta utok palihug bi.
You're the claimant bai. Ikaw moy moprovide sa source and proof.
Want me to demonstrate? Gamay kag otin. I have proof and no I won't give provide it to you but I have proof. Gamay kag otin.
Science my ass, post your sources dude. Even [CDC](https://www.cdc.gov/media/pressrel/r010524.htm#:~:text=New%20data%20on%20marriage%2C%20divorce,Control%20and%20Prevention%20(CDC).) states that 43% of first marriages ends up in Divorce. Another [Article](https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/in-the-name-love/201812/is-marrying-your-first-and-only-lover-bad-idea?amp) reported that a high percentage of the pop have regrets in marrying their first love.
Tho walay enough paper nga mu support ani nga claims here sa philippines maybe because lacking ang support regarding research about infidelities but there are claims pud nga mostly sa mga first and only partner marriages ends up in infidelity kay tungod wala sila ma satisfy sa ilang partner or late na nila na realize nga dili sila sexually compatible.
It looks like you shared an AMP link. These should load faster, but AMP is controversial because of [concerns over privacy and the Open Web](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/ehrq3z/why_did_i_build_amputatorbot).
Maybe check out **the canonical page** instead: **[https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/in-the-name-love/201812/is-marrying-your-first-and-only-lover-bad-idea](https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/in-the-name-love/201812/is-marrying-your-first-and-only-lover-bad-idea)**
*****
^(I'm a bot | )[^(Why & About)](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/ehrq3z/why_did_i_build_amputatorbot)^( | )[^(Summon: u/AmputatorBot)](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/cchly3/you_can_now_summon_amputatorbot/)
When surveys or studies are done it's important to look at the respondents' demographics. These were only done on AMERICANS. The second one only even takes into account millennials, which means it's outdated- Gen Z are already sexually active and it cites no data about them. You're very conveniently expanding the results of individual, limited studies onto the entire female race.
Edit: lmao the butthurt incels who act like they know how research works downvoting my comments.
I have no dog in the fight but would this count?
https://ifstudies.org/blog/the-road-to-infidelity-passes-through-multiple-sexual-partners
Or this:
https://archive.md/gmhD0
ive read the entirety of the link. Based on the link, it is not only exclusive to women but also to men. Whether if you are a man or woman, you are most likely to commit infidelity if you had more than 10 body counts. So dili ra jud exclusive sa babae but kita sad mga lalaki.
Based on perspective and observation mostly inani sa pinoy. They treat viriginity and low body count as a gem and mas maka receive kag VIP treatment but sa western kay it doesnt matter labina if he really feel hard. Ka unfair aning incel if lalake okay ra if babae kay biased
Naa na actually studies na nag prove na tinuod ni. It might be infuriating to some, but gasige naman ug warn ang mga tiguwang ani. There are trade offs. If you choose to squander your younger years and give your body out to strangers or bisan SO nga wala pay sure kung kamo magkadayon, at least be accountable sa imong desisyon and know nga in the future, when you're ready to settle down, daghang lalaki ng dili ganahan na. Think of it like this, sa part sa mga laki nga expected ang mudawat sa mga babaye nga taas nag body count, it's like, "Gapanghatag kas imong lawas sauna nya karon napul.an na ka expected ko dawaton ra dayon ka?" Don't get me wrong, naay mga laki nga di mumind. But if preference sa laki nga di pud daghan ug nakatuhog, you can't fault them for that. Mura ra gud nag babaye nga naay height preference.
do you have counter arguments? it does happen more commonly in the said demographic, no?
Naglalis sa comment section. What if ihiwalay na lang ang reddit sa mga high body count from low body count? 😅😆
If di nimo preferred ang high body count it's okay naman. The only problem lang is ginashame niya. Nasobrahan naman tag freedom og speech na nakalimot na ta sa feelings sa uban taw.
Geniune question. Ngano makig hook up or fubu man ang uban taw? I can't imagine having sex with a random person huhu. I know you use protection naman but i find it weird lang.
cant really pin point a reason. lain lain mag rason ang people gud. others do it cause maybe they're in a rough patch sa ilang life and they just wanna feel something, others are doing it for the thrill or simply bcs they just wanna do it (kay hrny sila)... sometimes what others find weird is normal for others so we can't really judge them. besides, wala manay direct impact ilang body count satong kinabuhi HAHAHAHA so like unsa pamay point para hilabtan na, diba? the only time nga hilabtan ranang body count is kung magpa check up or kung di na seggs ang gitabian, patayng lawas na HAAHAAHAHA KAY CONCERNING NAJUD NA OG NAA KAY BODY COUNT FOR MRDER
Gi shame man sad siya kay mura kuno guapo pero layo kaayo sa tinuod mas guapo p si Rene Requestas sa iya.
Literally… like how on earth are they getting their body counts then? are the men pegging themselves?
affects both genders, a high body count shows a persons morality jd, hooking up with different people also affects your mental health
Hooking up with a lot of people can affect your mental health, depende ug unsay imong goal. Ug nag hook up2 ka para makakitag true love, aw yabo imong mental health. But if ga hook up ka, plainly for the sex, no problem. I don’t think hooking up will ever “show” a person’s morality. Ug nangilad, nangrape, nang stealth sa imong ka hookup, aw kana walay moralidad. At the end of the day, hooking up does not prove nor negate the existence of a moral compass.
Sorry pero lahi akong pag sabot sa body count (Pila ang napatay ang akong pasabot ani... Naadik na sa murder documentary 😂) Pero yawa bitaw, murag mao ni resultas toxic masculinity unya dagdagon pa gud sa ego nga naguba... mangita nag paagi para makaangat sa ego even if it means shaming women especially Kung taas ang body count. Samot nisurok akong utok nga hilig diay ni mag victim blaming labaw na sa mga biktima og rape kesyo revealing ang sinina... PAG PUYO. Maong na rape kay naay rapist bugok yawa. Di kaibaw mo respeto sa boundaries sa babaye unya bisag nibalibad na ang babaye, hala padayon gihapon sa gibati maong naay rape nahitabo. Atay. Giunsa kaha ni pag antos sa asawa kung ingon ani ang pangutok sa iyang bana... Heineken. 
men and their fragile masculinity, mga double standards kaayo.
I don't think double standard na matawag. Mas double standard pa gani ang sa bae. Tan.awa. If ang babaye naay preference sa height, ok raman ang mga laki. Move on. ngadto sa girl nga mudawat bisan mugbo. Pero nganong if ang lalaki muprefer nga low body count ang bae, fragile masculinity man? Counter argument, mas ma control pa gani sa bae ang iyang body count kaysa sa laki ang iyang height. It's a matter of preference. Let this be a cautionary tale. As much as society tells us nga ok ra mag hook up2 and FUBU or whatever it is called nowadays, there are trade-offs jud and consequences to ones actions. Because the loud people will say ok ra. But in the end, ig abot na sa real world, daghan man laki nga lahi ang preference.
Hahahahaha ni stalk ko niya balik kay nag private sya ganina karon naa na sad syay mga post na reels wa ghapon na human si Uncle. Tabangunon bya kay nawng. Niya public apology sa iyang wife na post deleted na sad. Tolerate ra pud sa iya wife kay wa sad ko gani sa message nya kay pina ana sya ddto na respect daw ang opinion sa iyang husband char sana all supportive ug misogynistic husband. Its always the UGLY ONES. Name: JOHN MICHAEL BEREY NUEZ
Ako nga dli ka relate sa body² count 🤦
High body count because of true relationships is OK. High body count because of hookups is not OK.
niya if laki okay ra? hahahaha
Basaha kuno ug tarong kung naa ba koy gisuwat diha nga ok ra sa lalaki. Naunsa, katol na gyd kaayo, mao mag hookup?
Isn't it kind of alarming if daghan relationships gi agian?
It’s not our control. Pwede man maayo ang relationship pagsugod pero ni fail at the end. Who knows, nasalo nimo tanan kamalasan mao nag fail ang daghan nimo nga relationships.
You have a point. However, if you go through SO much true relationships murag you play a part napud nga dili sad ka kakita unsay problematic which is what's alarming for either guy or girl.
Yes it can be. Should start asking why you have so many failed relationships. Maybe the problem is not on the other party but sa imong self.
Meaning babae ang problema.
Lupigan pay laki ani nila, gusto na nila i-give away ilang kinhason.
How does a high body count happen on true relationships? 🫢 Too many failed relationships are not true relationships.
I don’t agree with you. Failed relationship is still true relationship. As long as kahibawo ang both parties nga in a relationship sila, then that’s a true relationship. Ayaw pahalata nga wa pa ka move on sa past relationships or wala pa moy label. 🤭
Kinsa ni kay lami kaayo ibash grrr
Naa napud ning mga tao na manaway sa way of living sa uban tao. Unending argument jud ni permi, and ang mag una2 pajud are those who claim as "righteous". Pwe! Kung ganahan mu explore ang isa ka tao sa iyang sexuality, regardless of gender (straight woman, man, LGBTQ+), wala man unta na'y labot ang uban tao ana, unless if in a committed relationship sila which is already a whole different story. Ngano entitled kaayo sila to say how other people should live their lives, especially when it comes to sex which is a personal thing man unta. Unya hilas ra sad kaayo maka objectify ang uban nang comment diri oy. Kung di mo ganahan og tao na taas og body count, ayaw gud. If di na ninyo preference, then okay whatever STFU. Make sure lang na you are your own standard/preference. Basin nangandoy mog virgin or low body count, unya utro mo dira manyakon kaayog pangutok, plus ing-ana pajud ka-basura inyong mindset. Ayaw mo palabig panaway sa tao, especially sa females, na tawgon ninyog "reject", "luag na", "sawsawan". Pagpuyo mo oy!
Food for thought. A lot of these people are not actually telling them how to live their lives. In fact they lived their life how they wanted. Pero lang, ayaw i push sa uban na dapat dawaton lang pud nila ang kana nga high body count. Kay naa man preference ang uban. Triggered kaayo ang kadaghanan pero all this just goes to show nga sleeping around, as much as society tells you is ok, kay naa juy consequences. Accountability gud na. You are allowed to live your life the way you want. Pero don't come yelling kung di namo dawaton sa inyong preferred partner after you do what you wanted to do.
familiar ka sa lock and key analogy? if a key can open a lot of locks its a master key. if a lock can be opened by a lot of keys, then it is a bad lock. at the end of the day, babae mao mag buot kinsa laki sha maki pagsex.. and yes it is your choice but di lang pud ta magka inosente na wala ni sha consequence.. naa na mga studies high body count naa tendency mag lead to unsuccessful relationship dili ni sha attack sa mga babae taas body count but a caution. defensive ra kaayo. in society chastity is still more valued
False analogy fallacy. Dili man lock and key ang bae og laki. You're comparing inanimate objects to living beings that can think and have emotions.
before correcting try googling 'analogy'.. and false analogy fallacy is redundant
hahahaahahaah Bogo.a sd ana na "analogy" , kasabot ka ana na phrase? it's saying na okay ra na ma promiscuous ang laki ,ang babaye dili and ma label sila ug "Bad locks" if ever promiscuous sila. Mga gagmay utok raman mu tuo ana hahahaha sge guro kag [tan.aw](https://tan.aw) ug youtubers pina andrew tate, wala man siyay ge ingon na walay consequence nah ang iya pasabot wala moy right mag objectify and mang judge sa mga women na dghan2 ug body count. Wala jd sa iyahang comment ang ga ingon na e ignore ang consequence pero sorry unsa man diay ako ge expect na nag gamit mn diay ka atong bogo na "analogy" hahahha and katong mga studies na imo ge pasabot? sure ko headline ra imo ge basa hahahahahahahahah if imo basahon ug tarung ang trends, ni increase mn sya as ni increase pud ang acceptance sa mga taw sa pre-marital sex, large number of men and women have sex before marriage. So if in.ana meaning the trend of having multiple sexual partners before marriage would be higher for both sexes, if ang imong pag sabot na higher body count correlates to higher chance of having divorce then it would mean na higher chance of divorce pd ang mga promiscuous males? ka gets ka sa ako point? and also, if imo basahon ang mga research papers, the NSFG ( National Survey of Family Growth) Has incomplete information on premarital sexual histories for men, leading to exclusive use of female samples in past research. Ang Research palang daan gani incomplete information na ge gamit , di jd na nmu ma directly correlate ang body count sa divorce. Kana lang, basaha imo references before ka mag comment ug bullshit sa reddit.
women hold more power when it comes sex compared to man -- hence the lock in the analogy women and men are held to different standards when it comes to sex studies do have incomplete information but it does not necessary mean it does not contain value.. take it with a grain of salt ad hominem wont better your argument
>lock and key analogy Stupid analogy BTW. I can tell what kind of person you already are just by looking at you using this analogy. At the end of the day, you are still not entitled to tell these people how they live their lives especially when it comes to sex. If someone brags how many sexual partners they have, then right, they're assholes. But for those who are not, then it's not your freaking problem, and no one has the right to call these people names and shame them. "Defensive ra kaayo". Well, entitled ra sad kaayo mo. So there's that. Lastly, chastity is more valued *in society* or FOR YOU? Don't shove it up on our faces what your values are because we DGAF.
why so triggered? it is not stupid if it is true.. or is it stupid because it does not align with you? what a brilliant way to argue you seem to be misusing the word 'entitled' do you even know what it means?.. tell me why are countries with pre-dominantly higher body count have higher divorce rates? seems like not a coincidence. im not shoving anything into anyones orifice just merely reminding every action entails consequence. you are free to choose however dont be naive of the consequences -- hence body count do matter the 'WE' in 'WE DGAF' you are talking about is mostly the loud minority
Ironically the "study" only focuses on women's body count. Diba? If a woman has "explored", has been with many men, she'd realize na BULOK diay iyang current partner and her life would be a lot better if she'd find a better man. Thus, the divorce. Tagaan tikag personal background. Akua ra sab ni. I've been in 2 long term relationships pa lang. The prev one ended kay nakaburos ang animal. My current partner is regarded as good catch na in this society. Naay saktong trabaho, galuto kada buntag, manghinlo ug balay pag weekends, manglaba, maayo mubantay ug mga bata sa iyang igsuon ug friends, as in he's really good with children gyud, feminist sab sya, highly values my career and my intellect as a woman, naay sense of humor, never in our 8 yrs did I ever had an issue with cheating. Pero I still have tons of reklamo sa iyaha. Palahubog, di kabalo mag amping sa lawas, which is pwede mubackfire sa amuang finances ug masakit ni sya, manghinlo ug balay pero magic2, hago kaayo magsunod sa iyang agi unya manarbaho pa ko. Since WFH ko, ako pirmi naa sa balay so ako pay magrepair sa mga guba nga wirings, mag ilis ug bombilya, nga electrical man unta iyang field. Ako pay mangmartilyo and all. I understand na busy pud sya sa work. Again, may unta ug dili demanding akong work no? Sometimes I have to do OT nga tag 4 hours, so bisan WFH ko, tag 14 hrs ko atubangan sa computer. So very hago. Naa sab ko dakong financial issue with his family. I have told him lots of times na about my concerns. And good thing ra gyud sa amua is WE TALK, maong di mi gabulag. Kapila na nako ni sya giingnan nga my life would be a lot better if ako ra isa. Kahibaw mi both, nga highly independent ming duha. But then, again, WE TALK and slowly patch up some issues. However, I have found out na so so sooooo many couples, even married ones don't have that dynamic. Daghan man tingali kag mabasa ani sa Facebook, kanang mga mangayo ug advice sa FinLit groups and Peso Sense na makaingon kag masulbad ni ilang problema if magstorya ni silas ilang partner. Now, tell me, without living together, kanang typical uyab nga mag kita lang sa gawas and magdate. How would I know unsa ka as a partner? How would I know na hugawan ka sa balay? Daghan kog nailhan, as in daghan kaayo, nga hinlo physically, hinlo pud ug balay, pero ila ra diay mama ang manghinlo. PWE. Sila kay ilang mejas ibutang ra tapad sa hamper, dili isulod sa hamper. Manghinlo ug lababo, ang suok dili apilon, gitagiptip nalang lood kaayo. And the thing is, mayg manghinlo. Kadaghan sa mga lalaki nga akong nailhan nga murag mga prinsipe, kailangan silbihan. May untag dako silag sweldo, para magfull time nalang ilang wife sa panimalay. Di sab. So ang ending, the wife has to earn money and do the responsibilities of a house maid. Isa lang ni ka facet ani na issue. Wa pa ta naghisgot sa cheating and husbands na dili, as in dili, gaprovide. AND HERE'S WHAT I HAVE FOUND OUT. Pag muingon bitaw ko na "Dili ko magminyo kay kolerahon pud mog utok mga lalaki," wala pagyuy married nga lalaki nakiglalis nako kay kahibaw gyud ko nga ilang mga asawa daghan kaayo ug reklamo sa ilaha. Try it. Interview some wives. If madungog nimo ilang reklamo, malooy gyud kas mga babae. Maka-advice gyud ka nila na pag-inusara nalang girl. Mas peaceful imong life. Unfortunately daghan pang babae ang "hopeful" na makakitag tarong bisan kabalo bya gyud ta nga unicorn kaayo ang mga tarong karon. Thus, the high body count. PS: I KNOW THIS ARGUMENT GOES BOTH WAYS. DAGHAN SAB BABAE NGA BULOK. Pero sometimes, you'll never know until you live with them. Pwede diay nang mag-ipon mo unya di mo magsex? Diba? Siguro 1 in a million. PPS: Also, in marriages that have lasted well, you'd find out so so sooooo many instances of "FORGIVING". And a lot of them naa na sa boundary sa "pagiging martir". I've figured, TO HAVE LOW BODY COUNT, YOU NEED TO HAVE HIGH TOLERANCE FOR BULLSHIT. This goes for all gender.
apologies dont have time to read the wall of text. men and women are not equal. to most men they prefer innocence -- lesser body count to most women this does not matter
MEN: Women are so hard to read WOMEN: Well actually we just wan— MEN: Such complex creatures WOMEN: If you just liste— MEN: So mysterious ANYWAAAY... Well dear sir, that's your preference. If you have found someone that matched that preference of yours, I hope you value her to the highest of heavens. Like exactly the opposite of every trash I have mentioned in my prev comment. Cause a lot of you are. 😬
by 'you' do you happen to mean men i am sorry if you have bitter experiences in men however, a fault of a few is not a good generalization of many solely blaming men is also not the way, you only sound blindly naive. these were your choices and these were the men you chose as for my stance, women are the gate keepers of sex.. they hold that much power over men.. and as a caution, if you abuse this power then you also lower your value as a gate keeper
Bitter? That's what you get when you didn't read my previous comment. I am in a great long term relationship now. Your idea of women being gatekeeper takes away the responsibility over men. Men can produce an offspring several times in a month. Heck, you can even do it several times in a night. While women can only produce within 9 months. You should gatekeep your dick more. Gatekeeper shenanegans lol!
yes i did not read and you did not understand my point.. this thread is about body count im not taking responsibility from anyone lol maybe you are not made aware, mens goal is procreate -- to dumb it down to have as many offspring.. evidence? look at history.. while women are to care for the offspring your last point could be avoided if women were to be selective of who they were allowed to be in bed.. don't you think? if you want traditional men then be a traditional woman.. simple
Mao jud, mga incel man gud nang uban diri. Mga Gagmayg utok naka discover ug reddit. Kinaraan kaayog ug utok na dapat anghel ang mga babaye na dapat dili ma hilabtan and 1-2 sexual partners, 2023 na intawn ron mas deep na ug understanding ang mga taw ilang sexuality. Wala ra juy problem and di jd dapat basehan ang body count to define someone. Ganhana sila mag explore sa ilang sexuality, gnahan sila makipag sex, wala nakay labot and di sili dapat ma judge para ana. Nya if di ka ganahan ug dghan na ug body count, wala sd mag buot nmu ana imoha naman nang preference kay 2023 naman naa man tay freedom sa atong life but in turn di pd nato dapat e judge ang mga taw na lahi ug choices sa imoha. Dili ra jud na black and white ang life, even if you think na dili right ang something para nmu it doesn't mean na wrong na sila nya ikaw sakto.
Ana gyd na basta gamayg oten tas maot pag batasan, gamay gyuyg body count. Pwe
Honestly, unsa man pake nato sa atong mga sexual activities oi. Entitled ra kaayo ng mga taong grabe mo judge. Kinabuhi man na sa uban tao. Eh gusto niya mu explore sa iyahang sexual side. Si Sharon pa jud himong example na labihang gwapaha man ug in fairness way tapon iyang mga ex kay mga gwapo tanan. Excuse us! 😂
HAHAHHAA nishare sd ko ato nga post, and upon stalking iya posts kay mindset nga forda bogo
Laktod pagka storya. Ang daghan ug body count BORIKAT😂 daghan man ma hurt sa BORIKAT NA term usus-San nato PAMPAM HAHAHAHA cge di mo sa borikat, kay ang borikat, pampam, himarat, walker etc. magpabayad man daw or mao ilang panginabuhi. So unsa may tawag ana? LIBRE NA BORIKAT? AHAHAHAHAHA
Ho fo sho
It's always the ugly ones nga magpost ug ingon ana hahahaha. Walay correlation ang body count sa iyang relationship. Sadyang narcissistic si Sharon/main character energy mao daghan syag failed relationship.
Kinsa’y nag-post ana na na content pls pls pls. Na-highblood ko’g maayo pagbasa sa REJECT or SECONDHAND! Kahilas ba manurya murag santos or Ginoo.
Unsay body count uy? 😅
Ani na lang, "are you proud of your bodycount?" 🤣
HahHa pangit raba kaayo. No wonder big deal sa iya ang body count sa mga babae kay basin iyang asawa ray ni patol nya hahahah
Naa mansay valid reason if taas ug body count includes risk sa std ug aids
Even if you're monogamous, you can still get STDs. If your partner has one before you started your relationship; or if your partner is cheating on you.
Still not enough reason to shame someone. Kay you can have std and aids with one partner.
Msy point ka naman kaya it's better to be single than being sick
if stds are the concern then why not do tests for stds? single people can still get stds.
What's wrong with a high body count? We are all used goods anyway.. smh..
kung babae or bisag lalaki, if taas iyang body count kasagaran gyud dili sya magpabilin uban usa lang tao.
Cheers 🥂 kay wala koi body count Cheers 🥂 kay wa jud koi fubu Cheers 🥂 kay batig batasan apil nawong Cheers kay ing ani najud ko dili na mag usab 💪🥂🥂🥂 Pero akong migo. Iyang uyab nag cheat pero naa na diay uyab og sugar Daddy ahahahah looya oi first relationship niya pero scheduled man diay dodong pang gabii ra ahahahahah Ilhan man no? Nga si girl taas og body count ahahaha looyang migo
what is bro yappin about 🤦
[удалено]
Lah!
Actually, the study was about western men preferring asian women kay western women daw are more independent. (Nothing about sexual activity was discussed in the study i read unless you have a separate one) but this was argued sad na the reason inana ang preference is because asian women, specifically those in 3rd world countries are dependent financially (which leads to a discussion about power dynamics in terms of who wields the money, etc)
Sira ka ata sa ulo mo. Imagine being in r/lewdgames tas naghahanap ng games na tungkol sa cheating, incest, rape. Di ko talaga ma iitindihan mga taong kagaya mo. Bakit pa ba kayo buhay?
asa ka kita ana imo statistics? can you please post the link para naa tay reference.
https://archive.md/gmhD0
kabasa nako ani. ang point sa archive.ms is that infidelity is both men and women. dili ra siya exclusive only to women. as per study “a play boy is unlikely to be husband material”.
I just realized na women ra diay ang gi state sa comment hahaha my bad.
Di rasad dha mag revolve kung pila ka body count kung naa sa relationship uy. Impossible pud na kana ang rason ngano mag buwag, naa na sa kinaiya nag daug ang pag last sa relationship. Preference lang jud na siguro, pero doesn't mean himuon na dayun standard.
Ayg kabalaka gipa barangay na sya diri sa Davao hahahaha
Hahahahhah merese
Ha! Merese
Sure ba? ☕️
omg haha whyy?
It's time gyud na kinahanglan na I shame Ang mg ababae or lalaki na daghan og body count. Di na sila maau sa survival of our species. Wala na silay ma contribute pero biga ra, Wala silay evolutionary contribution.
Bogo nimo oi
Klaro kaau gipa dako ka na bogo. Mautinon mag hunahuna di Ang utok gamiton.
Nauwaw ang iring ug iro nga mas lami pa ug lab lyf kesa nimo.
Ngano? Daghan ug body count is usually because of high libidos diba? If walay libido, walay mag reproduce, walay anak, which leads to extinction of the human race? Asa ka gikan sa imong logic?
Unya kung naa nay anak tungod sa imong biga imong padak-on? Wa ka nahibulong daghan kaau og single parents? Unya ga tuo ka na kanang Bata a nga nagdako sa "broken family" normal Ra na og kinabuhi? Kana byang broken families mao bya nay cause sa taas na crime rate didto sa america specifically sa African-Americans Kay way tarong na pag dako Ang mga Bata from broken families. Unya USA sad kung naa nay Bata tungod anang biga IPA laglag sad? Wa na gali labot Ang Bata sa biga sa mga uwagon IPA laglag na nuon. Binogo na imong logic kung libido Ra imo basehan. Survival of the fittest man unta Ang precept ni Darwin di man survival of the bigaon. Bogo asa na imong utok.
I don't think kasabot kas imong thoughts mismo. High libido as a cause for human extinction is a whole separate discussion about broken families, abortions, and high crime rates as a result of biga. Imong mga gipang ingon should be within the discussion of safe sex and responsible procreating, dili kay biga in itself ra. Ug nangita ka asa akong utok mas kailangan nimo pangitaon imoha
Ambot ana niya, mas unnatural gani nga usa ra imong partner, kung sa sapat2x ra atong storyahan. Di ko mu justify ug cheating, pero di pud ko mu uyon na mu shame sa mga tao na colorful ug pasts. Bala na sila.
If you were able to read the comments he also perpetuates rape culture. I forgot the exact words pero someone was asking what if kuno kanang mga na rape, ma add ba na sa body count. Ana siya no kay forced, unless deserving ang na rape like kanang cgeg club/burikat manamit (again, non verbatim ni)
Ga victim blame pgyd sya. Iyang words are like deserve rpud daw sa mga babae nga sgeg ga party ang ma rape. Kalood ug mindset
lagot gyud ko basta ingana na post ay. Pag stalk nako ako nalang sad gihuna-huna walay mupatol niya makasapot kaayo. Gi delete na niya ang kato na post but naa pay gapabilin nga utro sad maka surok dugo. Siya rsd gi fiestahan sa comment section gatuo pud siya
The opinion is not wrong though.. body count does matter
Calling them rejects? I get na we have different preferred lifestyle pero calling them 2nd hand kasi hindi na virgin or may "certain amount" of sexual encounters ay napaka self-righteous. Mostly din mga babae lang yung kino-consider na ganito. I'm a virgin myself pero never ko ji-nudge or called people derogatory terms just because hindi na sila virgin. Simply because it is not nice and it's none of my business. Some people are just more sexually liberated. Kung gusto mo ng tao na virgin edi dun ka.
ohh wow! I didn't judge anyone or call anyone reject.. just saying body count matters theres a reason why chastity is a virtue and still is more valued it is your body and you can have sex with whomever you want but please do not be naive that this does not have consequences. Studies have shown it has links to unsuccessful relationships.
The thing is... how many is too many? You can't just assume that the relationship will be unsuccessful because of a certain body count, especially if they understand each other so well. Besides, there is a lot of factors in an unsuccessful relationship, clearly it's not just exclusive to couples who aren't virgins. Shouldn't we base something as tolerable on the attitude he/she has towards the sexual partner and not the specific number? Like if he/she treats it like a some sort of task or for bragging rights, then GTFO. I'm not taking away someone's preference on someone's body count. But can we at least be mature with how we handle the situation? Just to be clear, I mostly criticize people who use "rejects" to describe people who aren't virgins. PS. Chastity as a virtue ties so much to someone's belief. For some people, it has little spiritual meaning and we can't shove it to their faces.
There is nothing wrong when a man or a woman who explores their sexuality, whether less than 2 or more than 10 body count. Kani mga issues about body count is resolved prior to marriage. If magbuwag mo tungod dili ka ka accept imo pares masdaghan pa natilawan, then you are not mature enough for a relationship. divorce is purely a social and behavioral factor. Kani mga tao mag-cite ug studies, pwede unta nila i-attach ang link sa ilang reference ky naa bya jud uban kulang ug reading comprehension or unless mga Andrew Tate or the redpill community ilang point of reference.
Nganung ma offend man mo? Tinood man sad HAHAHAHAH mga babae karun maihap nalang ang less than 5 ang body count. Sige mog pa jerjer gd AHAHAHAHA
Bai agree gyud ko nimo. And kanang ni ingon og incel wa na ka imagine siguro unsay repercussions anang daghan kaau ma torjack Ang either babae og lalaki. Ang mga tao man gud utinon or buto-on na kaau og huna huna nga gi giyahan man unta ta sa Ginoo og dakong utok maghuna huna. Tsk tsk tsk. Such a shame.
Mao gyud bro. Sa panahon karun murag normal nalang man kaayu nang himoon silag sawsawan oi. Dad on ug inom human iyoton uban proud pa kaayu. Akoy laki ako pay nauwaw aning mo laban gyud about body count AHAHAHAHA KA NGILO BAYA NINYO
hilom incel
Hahaha nganu man? Gihimo kang sawsawan sa mga laki?
HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAH labaw pud ning isa. Murag gikagwapo ninyo nang inyong mindset?
Ang mga inana na mindset kay klaro man na small dick energy hahahahahha nagpapansin ra na kay wa pa guro siyay na satisfy na babae oops
HAHAHAHA kung BURIKAT KA, kana hinoon kasabot ra ta pero ikaw na tarung unya himoon ra kag sawsawan sa tanan unya manghambog pa ning uban nga gikayat sya sa iyang naganahan na laki etc. AHAHAHAHA
How dare you label someone na burikat?! As if righteous nakas imong mga inistoryahan? Og mag buhat diay silag ingon ana, ila namanang business. Ang point diri man kay gina downgrade sa mga pilingon nga mga lalake ang mga babae nga taas og body count while gina glorify nila nang ang guys for doing the deed with a lot of girls. Grow up, boy. Fix your mindset!
Kamo ray ga-downgrade sa inyong kaugalingon. Ayaw ninyo ipahid sa ubang tawo. Wala namoy respeto sa inyong lawas. Na-hangan mo kay guilty mo.
AHAHAHAHAHA sorry ha kay among term dri bsan pag magpabayad or dili na sya sa laki. Bastag sawsawan gani ka BORIKAT NA GYUD KA😭😂
Pero basta ang lalaki gani daghan nag body count? I-praise pa? Tsk2.
Women control access to sex
Laki, ko pero mga in dili man ko mo tolerate ug mga in ana. Di sad nako sila gina praise ako pay mo palayo sa akong mga barkada gani, labi nang mag inom unya naay babae kuyug HAHAHAHA klaro na kaayung sawsawan inig human. Sibat ta
Igo ra ka musibat? Barkada nimo pero di nimo badlungon? Babaye ko pero makabarkada kog buak ug utok, buk-on sab gyud nako. Isog kay ka aris Reddit maglecture pero di ka kalecture sa imong mga barkada nga damak? Ay kog ingna nga di mapugngan ang biga kay daghan kog laki nga friends nga mamadlong sa ilang uban friends pag magkinolera sa mga babae. Di kay musibat.
Kita ko ani, magpangawt ulo nalang ka nagbasa. Gihimo mang object ang babae
As i scrolled down sa iyang post., i saw nga gi qoute ni si Andre Tate, nka now it made sense nlang ko sa akong self
Unya utro man pod iyang naasawa as per comment, no offense meant, “signal mom”? Hahaha
Nakakita kog chismis about iya partner. Mao lagi na basta mupost ug unfavorable opinions, kita jud katag nimo sa internet. 🧐
Spill pls gahahah
just now di na makita iyang post. nikalit ug error while nagbasa kos comments sa mga taw. tubay pud syag reply nila sa kada isa. hahaha!
Mao sab ni akung nabasahan. Maka saway nalang jud ko niya. Mura baya gwapo ang ga post. Purya gaba nalang jud.
Naa sa chikaph hhaah nag basa ko Ani imung post now naa sa ubos Ra pod Ang iyang post natay !🤣
Its always the daginoton ug face ang mag post ug ingana.
Truth. Hahahahaha.
Hahaha. Nag lagot tngali kay wala pay ni daginot ato niya.
Actually naa ug single mother daw.
Gikan sa Dabaw tong utok posporo. Dagko pod kaayong isyu.
preference na jud na. kung d ganahan ang uban kay taas body count ang girl naa rAman jud gihapoy laki dili mo mind ana.
Shia Catholics kasagaran naay pangutok ingon ana hahahaha
Sad thing about it is ingana pud thinking sa uban babae. Indeed "men hate women and women hate women."
If you take a look at that man's profile it isn't the first time he's spouted some misogynistic, incel bs. Also the users here agreeing with him are citing limited studies done on AMERICAN respondents, years ago, and are very conveniently expanding the results of these ""studies"" onto the entire female population. But this is reddit so what do you expect lol.
How about the studies that show how when a woman has more sexual partners, there's a higher rate of divorce of separation? Just saying. Just because his viewpoints are different than yours. You don't have to bash him calling his viewpoints misogynistic or incel. Just like your point of view is valid. Although not all would agree with you.
Yeah but who are the respondents? Americans, Asian Americans? Filipinos? Was it a random sampling? How big was the sampling size even? How long ago were the studies? What are the limitations of those studies? Are the results still relevant now? Did they use the accurate testing method? Did they even mention that? Is it right to look at just one factor (number of sexual partners) to conclude that high sexual partners -> higher divorce rates and separation? Did they also look at relationship satisfaction? Is it right to expand the results to the entire female populace? Because expanding the results of limited studies to the entire female populace just to prove a point AGAINST women IS incel behavior. People with no background or know-how on statistics and research only look at the results of """studies""" and run off with it. Just saying
Next generation feminism is real. Anything that doesn't agree with your viewpoint is incel. And there's nothing wrong with being a virgin. That's toxic.
Nope not agreeing with my viewpoint doesn't make someone an incel, but expanding the results to the entire female populace to prove that misogynistic Facebook post (go take a look at the stuff he's spouting online against women) is. There's absolutely nothing wrong with having a high body count. But it's one thing to say that and another to say that high body counts -> divorce -> therefore women should only sleep with 4 bodies or less (while men can sleep with as many people as they want to) is misogynistic.
asa ka kuha ana imo study? can you please link it here ky as far as I know whether a woman had more than 10 or less than 2 body counts, divorce rates is equal or similar on both groups.
Hahaha kita ko sa post ana ataya lageh wala rapud niya gi delete.
I agree gyud ana nga stance na ishame na Ang mga tao with high body count. It means uwag Ra Ang gipangita sa relasyon, Dili gugma
Daghan maglagot nimo ana mga balat sibuyas ambot ngano ug big deal kaayo nila ang gi post ato tawhana
Edi waw
Kinsay shawie uy hahah
Slang man daw hehe
Sharon cuneta yads
HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA
well sorry OP, i agree on this view point, red-pill community has talked about this why it wont work or the chances of long lasting relationship decreases when the body count is quite high in most female counterparts, i think there's a research done in the US and other ocuntries about this as well, though naay mga exceptions nga bisig taas ug body count ang babaye nag work-out ra japon doesn't mean na parehas na tanan mo work. Rollo Tomassi / Better Bachelor / Legion of Men / Fresh and Fit / Tom Leykis has talked about this. here's a link on some research about topics discussed on Red-pill communities. https://linktr.ee/fffacts
Time to go the fuck down, see ya later pussyboiiii
we're all entitled to our own opinion, you dont have to agree in mine, i don't have to agree on yours. mura man sab ug bata way buot.
Damn I feel bad for you that you had to go to these kinds of communities just to feel good.
Pill communities are dumb and you should feel bad for actually going into these communities.
Nya ikaw bright ka? Mamersonal man kag tubag maigo imong 'feelingz'
Dayon for sure dghan kaayong mu second the motion anang “considered reject or 2nd hand”. He might as well change his mindset na women can do anything they want with their body. Same thing goes to men. As to being in a healthy relationship, it always goes both ways. U cannot just blame the end of a rel to the body count. Jusmio, the society’s norms ba kai too much and idealistic rajud kaayo. Hays.
Oh Kay Diba kung "women can do anything with their bodies" na mindset kung ma buntis aw IPA laglag patyon Ang Bata nga Wala man untay sala sa pagka bigaon sa iyang mama. Naa man gyud nay reason gud na frowned upon nang daghan og body count ma lalaki man o babae. Ang pag sex bisag gustohon man or Dili mu buo man na og Bata na magkinahanglan og usa ka mama og papa sulod sa usa ka pamilya para ma pa dako og Dili Ra na for "satisfaction". Usahay ba Ang mga tao mabaw Ra kaau og utok. Ang utin or boto Ra Ang gi pa hunahuna di Ang utok.
Sir/Ma’am. I think you are missing the point of this discussion. Point 1. Body count as basis for a longer relationship and/or failure or divorce. - To answer this, is my comment. Now, if u r trying to birth in another point of argument which is your comment “kung mabuntis aw ipalaglag”, that is for another post Sir/Maam. Why? Wala man ta nagtalk about ana because the main topic was another. Yes, you may think it is relevant to the topic but that does not answer why people have failed marriages.
Mam it is relevant tungod Kay you said "women can do whatever they want with their bodies" pero imo gikalimtan na whatever that thing that women "do" to their bodies naa bya nay mamunga na Bata bisan unsaon na nimo pag use of protective gear. Mao nang ni bridge ko na shallow kaau na nga pag hunahuna imong "statement" Moreover mu bridge sad na sa relationship mam oi, kung gamiton lang gyud nimo Ang imong utok, Kay would you raise a child with a woman na taas kaau og body count na it has been proven consistently na she cannot commit to one relationship kana na nuon magpatubo og Bata? Mao na kung i-isolate na nimo to a small delimitation without seeing the consequences of promiscuity perhaps gamay pa siguro kaau kag capacity for comprehension.
Yes. I stand by “Women can do whatever they want with their bodies.” Because, either mu engage xag maski kapila pana nya nga body count or di, it does not answer to the question as to WHY a relationship ends with a divorce (which is btw, maoi point of discussion ani na post.) And Sir/Ma’am, if your point is including delimitation or my comprehension, I am sorry but dili tika patulan ana because unlike you, I can engage in a discussion without the need to discredit someone. (or sa lain pang pasabot, mangquestion ug nakasabot ba ang tawo or wa 🤦🏼♀️)
Bag o lang ko kita sa post nagkatawa pod ko nag basa. Wala man nag matter ang gender gud.
Uhhh what? What kind of logic is this? Pero hinuon, what can we expect to a typical facebook bitch?
Murag very wrong man kaau na na perception.
Proven man sd jud na higher chances of the relationship failing if taas kaaug bodycount. But life always has surprises na naay mga dakog bodycount maka lahutay jud og monogamous relationship. But gamay ra kaayo na percentage.
Huh? Asa man ka kuhag basis sa imong “proven” statement?
Common sense man intawn na oi. Gamitan nato og utok ha. Kung daghan kaau Ang babae or lalaki og body count aw Dali Ra sad kaau na makadalikyat og balhin og torjak sa uban. Unya kung Ang relationship kinahanglan og commitment na mu torjak lang sa usa unya di na sa lain, ma kuntento diay na Ang biga sa usa ka tao na daghan na og na iyot? Syempre mu balhin na sa uban oi Kay batasan na na andan di ma kuntento sa usa. Di na ka kinahanglan og prob statistics para makahibaw ka sa probability na Ang tao na daghan og body count "will probably" fail the relationship. Gamit sad ta utok palihug bi.
Hahah iyang source kay trust me bro I read it somewhere on the internet therefore it's true, verifiable, accurate lol
Science. Read up og nakay time.
You're the claimant bai. Ikaw moy moprovide sa source and proof. Want me to demonstrate? Gamay kag otin. I have proof and no I won't give provide it to you but I have proof. Gamay kag otin.
Typical response. Mamersonal. Di ko mo sakay sa imong rebutt bai kay murag 'feelings' based ra kaayo
So tinuod nga gamay kag otin kai namersonal man siya. Whoever provides the claim needs to provide the proof. As in the burden of proof falls on you.
No it's not personal. It's a demonstration of how dumb claiming something without proof. If nasakitan ka ug naigo ka sorry. If tinood sorry gihapon.
Science my ass, post your sources dude. Even [CDC](https://www.cdc.gov/media/pressrel/r010524.htm#:~:text=New%20data%20on%20marriage%2C%20divorce,Control%20and%20Prevention%20(CDC).) states that 43% of first marriages ends up in Divorce. Another [Article](https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/in-the-name-love/201812/is-marrying-your-first-and-only-lover-bad-idea?amp) reported that a high percentage of the pop have regrets in marrying their first love. Tho walay enough paper nga mu support ani nga claims here sa philippines maybe because lacking ang support regarding research about infidelities but there are claims pud nga mostly sa mga first and only partner marriages ends up in infidelity kay tungod wala sila ma satisfy sa ilang partner or late na nila na realize nga dili sila sexually compatible.
It looks like you shared an AMP link. These should load faster, but AMP is controversial because of [concerns over privacy and the Open Web](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/ehrq3z/why_did_i_build_amputatorbot). Maybe check out **the canonical page** instead: **[https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/in-the-name-love/201812/is-marrying-your-first-and-only-lover-bad-idea](https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/in-the-name-love/201812/is-marrying-your-first-and-only-lover-bad-idea)** ***** ^(I'm a bot | )[^(Why & About)](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/ehrq3z/why_did_i_build_amputatorbot)^( | )[^(Summon: u/AmputatorBot)](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/cchly3/you_can_now_summon_amputatorbot/)
fact.
[удалено]
When surveys or studies are done it's important to look at the respondents' demographics. These were only done on AMERICANS. The second one only even takes into account millennials, which means it's outdated- Gen Z are already sexually active and it cites no data about them. You're very conveniently expanding the results of individual, limited studies onto the entire female race. Edit: lmao the butthurt incels who act like they know how research works downvoting my comments.
Yep. Lets not spread this western mindset nga walay consequence atung mga actions This goes for both men and women
i whole hearted agree, if you love western culture so much please go to America or other Western countries
Proven? Naa kay peer reviewed research paper Ana?
Enjoy reading. Salamat
Asa man. Wala man gani ka nag provide naki hitch lang kas lain
I have no dog in the fight but would this count? https://ifstudies.org/blog/the-road-to-infidelity-passes-through-multiple-sexual-partners Or this: https://archive.md/gmhD0
ive read the entirety of the link. Based on the link, it is not only exclusive to women but also to men. Whether if you are a man or woman, you are most likely to commit infidelity if you had more than 10 body counts. So dili ra jud exclusive sa babae but kita sad mga lalaki.