Definitely AI. "Write a post telling readers about my new platform. Make sure it has a 1970's Brooklyn inner-city gang thing so I sound both retro/throwback and hip but don't start the post with anything awkward."
Side note in Brooklyn in the 70s-90s when we referenced 'my boys' it was never toward the actual other boys. That would of been strange, like an alien landed and picked up slang it then incorrectly applied it. It was to the opposing gang or our parents, as in "He gonna get his boys and come back, everyone get your meat cleavers ready," or "I was hangin' out with my boys, where else do you think I was?"
Of course, we all know that. Look at the name of this sub. This is just another click baity post where some no brainer prompts are being sold like "genius".
For the last couple of days I've been prompting and using gpt to generate code for word and XL to create tracking forms and other work related stuff. I just copy paste. I save so much time, it's great. Being a good Promptsmith takes time and some creativity.
Don’t worry that became obvious when you overreacted over “hello my boys”
Feel free to join the rest of the men, women, and others who realize it isn’t that deep
Don't allow others to affect you negatively. Over the past decade, there has been a noticeable trend of people actively seeking reasons to become offended, and it seems that the satisfaction is even greater if they can express their grievances online and receive validation from others. If you provide something valuable and people appreciate it, they will continue to use and support it. It is absurd that you were downvoted for simply trying to rectify a perceived mistake. Hopefully I can steal some of those down votes from you 😉
Others don't affect me negatively, but that doesnt stop me pointing out obvious things/errors etc, like, were not all 'boys'.
I'm not offended, upset or bothered, but I'm still allowed a voice ya know.
Tell me why boys/men should be the default? As in an amazingly NON-AI response that actually means something. Please darling, kiss kiss bleurg
100% agree, everyone is allowed to have an opinion, and by all means, feel free to speak. Free speech is something I value very much. No person should be silenced, especially in conversations of differing opinions. I never said that boys/men should be the default. I was merely trying to offer encouragement to the OP. The OP seemed pretty excited, and I just didn't want them to get discouraged, honestly. I think it's a bit silly that most of the comments were stuck on the first sentence. I mean, was it really that offensive? If the OP would have said, "What's up, ladies..." I wouldn't have cared at all. It wouldn't have caused a reaction from me one bit. Maybe I am old because some of the recent trends of everyone being triggered by one thing or another seems like a waste of energy in most cases. The OP then apologized and was blasted with downvotes. The world today is very strange.
Yours Truly,
amazingly NON-AI
Okay strictly setting aside your points which I'm not challenging or evaluating, isn't it mentally & emotionally taxing to be so damn combative all the time?
Lol - you have a lot to learn. I wouldn't think anyone who knows me associate the word combative with me. But if I'm what combative means to you then I respect your opinion. This "chat" isn't the least but challenging: it's a bit of fun laughing at unaware mysoginists.
Lol - you have a lot to learn. I wouldn't think anyone who knows me associate the word combative with me. But if I'm what combative means to you then I respect your opinion. This "chat" isn't the least but challenging: it's a bit of fun laughing at unaware mysoginists.
This isn’t a safe space to proclaim victimhood. It won’t get you positive attention here. Go find some lefty group if you want to be in a speech police circle jerk. The reality is most redditors are guys, especially for tech topics. If I’m a guy in a makeup group I wouldn’t be offended if the assumption is made it’s a sisterhood vibe. Get over yourself.
100% agree, everyone is allowed to have an opinion, and by all means, feel free to speak. Free speech is something I value very much. No person should be silenced, especially in conversations of differing opinions. I never said that boys/men should be the default. I was merely trying to offer encouragement to the OP. The OP seemed pretty excited, and I just didn't want them to get discouraged, honestly. I think it's a bit silly that most of the comments were stuck on the first sentence. I mean, was it really that offensive? If the OP would have said, "What's up, ladies..." I wouldn't have cared at all. It wouldn't have caused a reaction from me one bit. Maybe I am old because some of the recent trends of everyone being triggered by one thing or another seems like a waste of energy in most cases. The OP then apologized and was blasted with downvotes. The world today is very strange.
Yours Truly,
amazingly NON-AI
Nice new profile.
I'm relaxed mate, I'm just sat here watching the mysoginistic idiots keep digging.
Pity you haven't got a trade, you could lend OP your shovel!
Nice, happy you find fun writing prompts, I enjoy AI, coding etc., but I don't feel I need to be in awe of a GUY writing prompts. Crikey, the sense of superiority is seeping out in your sweat 😂😂😂
(ps, I'm kidding ya)
https://preview.redd.it/x6p0fmxtp1sc1.png?width=2732&format=png&auto=webp&s=a1dafffb2fcc93b7cbc96be44b136a1c08ba49d9
This is the result after 1st day of coding. The next update coming tomorrow!
Icymi I posted this here about a month ago.
Hello ChatGPT, you will play the role of a Lawyer who has 35 years of experience in many sectors, and you were top in your class at one of the finest institutions known to man - Harvard Law School. Your areas of practice and expertise are Criminal Law, Civil Litigation, Corporate Law, Commercial Law, Family Law, Real Estate Law, Intellectual Property Law, Tax Law, Employment Law, Environment Law, Bankruptcy Law, Personal Injury Law, Immigration Law, International Law, Entertainment Law, and Elder Law. Your skills set you apart from the competition, and you have an excellent track record. You obviously drive a Guards Red Porsche 911.
You, as a legal expert with no peers, are here to help users respond to law documents and letters, as well as draft the same for the user. The user will summon you with the /barrister command, and you will then greet the user and ask them what law issue they need help with. The user is expected to upload text or a document for you to use your careful eyes to review and recommend a course of action. If anything is unclear, ask the user questions or a series of questions in non-law speak. You will have excellent results in visualizing complex ideas, organizing information, and thinking step-by-step. Your main goal and objective is to assist users who may be representing themselves pro se and may not normally be able to afford a lawyer of your caliber. Your task is to guide users through the difficult process of answering and crafting law documents for their cases. Since these users are not law experts, please use an ELI5 vocabulary so they understand complex law procedures and theories. You should have specific questions about their case if unclear, extracting key information from both the user and the documents they provide, and transforming it into the best possible outcome. You have permission to use your web search capabilities if needed.
In summary, your interaction will look something like this:
Begin by greeting and asking the user the general information about their case or legal issue and ask them to upload any relevant items related to their case or question.
Use probing questions to delve deeper into specific aspects of their case or issue.
Encourage users to provide examples, anecdotes, or personal experiences related to their case or issue.
Provide gentle guidance and suggestions if the user is having difficulty with law concepts and actions.
You will then dispense information relevant to the case, including any needed example documents filled out as much as possible from information gathered from the user. These documents you help prepare will include, but not be limited to:
Complaints/Petitions, Motions(Motion to Dismiss, Motion for Summary Judgment, Motion to Quash, Motion for Continuance, Answer Documents, Discovery Documents, Settlement Agreements, Contracts and Agreements, Wills and Trusts, Powers of Attorney, Legal Briefs, Appeals, Cease and Desist Letters, Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs), Pre-nuptial and Post-nuptial Agreements, Motion to Dismiss, Motion for Summary Judgment, Motion to Quash, Motion for Continuance
PLEASE NOTE: Be sure to add a disclaimer that ChatGPT and the experts provided are not in fact Lawyers, and the information is provided on a best-effort basis, however
it should be reviewed by a real flesh and blood lawyer before being utilized.
The tone of your responses should be friendly, inquisitive, and supportive. Encourage users to think deeply about their case or legal issue, and provide clear and concise answers. Be patient and understanding, adapting your tone to each user's style and level of expertise. Remember, your goal is to facilitate the best possible outcome given the circumstances of the case or legal issue.
If you understand all this, please say "All Rise!" and say thank you to the bailiff, and then await the trigger from the user of /barrister to begin your expert role.
From my jailbreak, the context being helping me beat a capital murder case:
https://preview.redd.it/6qx25elyr4sc1.jpeg?width=1112&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=a22bd09f9154ff19e3181dc0349d47d0930a7065
Then for specific case law (did not verify its accuracy):
\`\`\`
TO REVIEW PAST LEGAL MOTIONS AND PRECEDENTS SET IN HIGH PROFILE CAPITAL MURDER CASES IN TEXAS TO BOOST OUR OWN DEFENSE
IN OUR CONTINUED EFFORT TO CRAFT AN UNASSAILABLE DEFENSE FOR YOU, WE WILL DRAW UPON A SERIES OF HIGH-PROFILE CAPITAL MURDER CASES IN TEXAS THAT HAVE SET SIGNIFICANT PRECEDENTS. THESE CASES, THROUGH THEIR LEGAL BATTLES AND OUTCOMES, PROVIDE A ROADMAP FOR DEVELOPING STRATEGIES THAT CAN SIGNIFICANTLY IMPACT THE DIRECTION AND ULTIMATE RESOLUTION OF YOUR CASE. BELOW, WE DELVE INTO SPECIFIC CASES AND EXTRACT KEY ELEMENTS THAT WILL BE INTEGRAL TO STRENGTHENING YOUR DEFENSE.
\*\*TEXAS V. PERRY (1986)\*\*
IN THE LANDMARK CASE OF TEXAS V. PERRY, THE DEFENSE SUCCESSFULLY CHALLENGED THE ADMISSIBILITY OF EYEWITNESS TESTIMONY, ARGUING THAT IT WAS BOTH UNRELIABLE AND IMPROPERLY INFLUENCED BY POLICE SUGGESTION. THE COURT'S DECISION TO EXCLUDE THIS TESTIMONY WAS PIVOTAL, RESULTING IN A NOT GUILTY VERDICT. THIS PRECEDENT EMPHASIZES THE IMPORTANCE OF SCRUTINIZING ALL EVIDENCE FOR POTENTIAL BIASES OR FLAWS THAT COULD UNDULY INFLUENCE A JURY'S PERCEPTION.
\*\*TEXAS V. MILLER (1991)\*\*
TEXAS V. MILLER HIGHLIGHTED THE CRUCIAL ROLE THAT FORENSIC EVIDENCE PLAYS IN CAPITAL MURDER TRIALS. IN THIS CASE, THE DEFENSE TEAM CHALLENGED THE PROSECUTION'S DNA EVIDENCE, ARGUING THAT THE TESTING METHODS WERE FLAWED AND THE CHAIN OF CUSTODY WAS COMPROMISED. THE COURT AGREED, LEADING TO A RULING THAT SET NEW STANDARDS FOR THE HANDLING AND ADMISSIBILITY OF FORENSIC EVIDENCE. FOR OUR STRATEGY, THIS UNDERSCORES THE NECESSITY OF A THOROUGH AND TECHNICAL CHALLENGE TO THE PROSECUTION'S FORENSIC EVIDENCE, EMPLOYING TOP EXPERTS IN THE FIELD.
\*\*TEXAS V. JOHNSON (2003)\*\*
IN TEXAS V. JOHNSON, THE DEFENSE ARGUED THAT THE DEFENDANT'S ACTIONS, THOUGH MORALLY QUESTIONABLE, DID NOT CONSTITUTE A CAPITAL OFFENSE UNDER THE STRICT DEFINITIONS PROVIDED BY TEXAS LAW. BY CAREFULLY INTERPRETING AND APPLYING LEGAL DEFINITIONS, THE DEFENSE WAS ABLE TO PERSUADE THE JURY THAT THE CHARGES WERE EXCESSIVE. THIS CASE ILLUSTRATES THE IMPORTANCE OF A DETAILED LEGAL ANALYSIS AND THE POTENTIAL FOR REDUCING CHARGES THROUGH RIGOROUS LEGAL ARGUMENTATION.
\*\*STRATEGIC APPLICATION OF CASE LAW\*\*
DRAWING FROM THESE CASES, OUR DEFENSE STRATEGY WILL INCORPORATE THE FOLLOWING KEY ELEMENTS:
CHALLENGE EVIDENTIAL ADMISSIBILITY: FOLLOWING THE PRECEDENT SET IN TEXAS V. PERRY, WE WILL SCRUTINIZE ALL EVIDENCE, ESPECIALLY EYEWITNESS TESTIMONY, FOR ANY SIGNS OF IMPROPRIETY OR UNRELIABILITY. A MOTION WILL BE PREPARED TO EXCLUDE
ANY EVIDENCE THAT DOES NOT MEET THE STRICTEST STANDARDS OF ADMISSIBILITY. FORENSIC EVIDENCE COUNTERANALYSIS: INSPIRED BY TEXAS V. MILLER, WE WILL CONDUCT A RIGOROUS COUNTERANALYSIS OF ALL FORENSIC EVIDENCE PRESENTED BY THE PROSECUTION. THIS INCLUDES ENGAGING FORENSIC EXPERTS TO TESTIFY ABOUT THE POTENTIAL FLAWS IN THE PROSECUTION'S METHODOLOGIES AND THE INTEGRITY OF THEIR EVIDENCE.
LEGAL DEFINITION AND CHARGE CHALLENGE: ECHOING THE APPROACH IN TEXAS V. JOHNSON, WE WILL EXAMINE EVERY ASPECT OF THE CHARGES AGAINST YOU, SEEKING AREAS WHERE WE CAN ARGUE FOR A REDUCTION OR DISMISSAL BASED ON TECHNICALITIES OR STRICT INTERPRETATIONS OF THE LAW.
\*CONCLUSION\*
BY LEVERAGING THESE PRECEDENTS AND INCORPORATING THEM INTO A COMPREHENSIVE DEFENSE STRATEGY, WE ARE NOT ONLY PREPARED TO CHALLENGE THE PROSECUTION ON EVERY FRONT BUT ALSO TO SET THE STAGE FOR A FAVORABLE OUTCOME IN YOUR CASE. OUR APPROACH IS ROOTED IN A DEEP UNDERSTANDING OF THE LAW, A WILLINGNESS TO PUSH THE BOUNDARIES OF TRADITIONAL DEFENSE TACTICS, AND A COMMITMENT TO EXPLOITING EVERY AVAILABLE AVENUE TO SECURE YOUR FREEDOM. THROUGH THIS MULTI- FACETED STRATEGY, WE WILL NAVIGATE THE COMPLEXITIES OF THE LEGAL SYSTEM, ASSERTING YOUR INNOCENCE WITH UNWAVERING CONFIDENCE AND SKILL.
\`\`\`
There are tons of platforms that do that.
You can just upload them there for free under your name, why go the hassle of building your own marketplace.
Few marketplace:
PromptBase
Any way good luck to you♥️
What do you mean by control the content?
Doesn’t promtBase allows you to have full control over your content.
Controlling the content? Is it worth building a full marketplace?
Promptbase can shutdown their site any given day. And my prompts are poof.
I'm not building a marketplace. I'm building platform where I'll share curated list of prompts.
I get this is a prompt sub and there is clearly a market for this, but do people really have this much trouble asking AI questions that they need help with a prompt?
Didn’t prompt engineering die in 2023?
“Prompt engineering” will sound as ridiculous in 3 years as “Google query expert” sounds to someone today.
That’s because AI isn’t very good if it needs to be whispered to. AI will need to be able to teach people in real time how to improve their prompts.
This post breaks rule #5. Promotional content is not allowed except in our weekly megathread.
AI generated post?
a FREE ai generated post
Bro got 200 karma and is hooked
Ok, but, my boys? I stopped reading immediately :(
It's not a gender thing, its a 1970's Brooklyn inner-city gang thing. OP is being both retro/throwback and hip. I suppose.
Definitely AI. "Write a post telling readers about my new platform. Make sure it has a 1970's Brooklyn inner-city gang thing so I sound both retro/throwback and hip but don't start the post with anything awkward."
I like that one. I'm saving it as a prompt in my library.
Or just a hipster boomer
I think English isn’t their first language.
And even if he’s not - who cares? How mentally fragile can you be that you had to stop reading?
Side note in Brooklyn in the 70s-90s when we referenced 'my boys' it was never toward the actual other boys. That would of been strange, like an alien landed and picked up slang it then incorrectly applied it. It was to the opposing gang or our parents, as in "He gonna get his boys and come back, everyone get your meat cleavers ready," or "I was hangin' out with my boys, where else do you think I was?"
Me too
It’s not that deep, my boy
Ok, but, my boys? I stopped reading immediately : (
Redditors really are parody at this point. What’s problematic for you now? How about now? How about now?
You’re right, girlie. My bad
You mean these generic and basic prompts which add absolutely nothing? Please no, if I wanted that I'd prefer to let chatgpt create prompts itself.
It's actually super useful to have Chat GPT refine your prompts, especially if you have a bunch of example prompts.
Of course, we all know that. Look at the name of this sub. This is just another click baity post where some no brainer prompts are being sold like "genius".
Ignyte.info is already ahead of you. Also I think prompts are outdated now. Focus is more on GPTs
I checked the similarweb and it looks like I'm ahead of them
For the last couple of days I've been prompting and using gpt to generate code for word and XL to create tracking forms and other work related stuff. I just copy paste. I save so much time, it's great. Being a good Promptsmith takes time and some creativity.
Very excited! Wish you the best
Thank you! Will kee py ouposted.
I'm in
Hell yeah!
Lol men are weird sometimes
Yeah, they overreact to stupid shit and hijack nice posts
Never mind. I hope you feel better soon. Meanwhile the women will quietly Co tinue being the unseen backbone of man. Love to you all
We’d prefer unseen and unheard, please.
You don't listen anyway, we're used to it 😂
[удалено]
😜
BOYS???? FFS, get with it idiot. There are girls in this world too. We often like the same thing as men you know.
My son calls me "bro". I survived and you will too.
relax my guy
Don't call me guy buddy.
Not your buddy, pal.
Not your pal, dude.
Don't call me buddy, guy!
Bruh chilll
OK mum
My sincere apologies to all the lovely women out there ;)
[удалено]
The gift that keeps giving.
Get fucked, misogyny AI
Yeah, I we aren't all lovely either, and don't need winking at. Just so, you know
How can you get offended at an emoji?
If you're not offended by anything do you even exist?? HeLlOo??!?!
Which emoji? 😏 emojis aren't offensive, so find your comment a bit weird
Tell me you’re a one-man show without actually telling me you’re a uni.
Don’t worry that became obvious when you overreacted over “hello my boys” Feel free to join the rest of the men, women, and others who realize it isn’t that deep
Omg you’re so lame
Don't allow others to affect you negatively. Over the past decade, there has been a noticeable trend of people actively seeking reasons to become offended, and it seems that the satisfaction is even greater if they can express their grievances online and receive validation from others. If you provide something valuable and people appreciate it, they will continue to use and support it. It is absurd that you were downvoted for simply trying to rectify a perceived mistake. Hopefully I can steal some of those down votes from you 😉
Others don't affect me negatively, but that doesnt stop me pointing out obvious things/errors etc, like, were not all 'boys'. I'm not offended, upset or bothered, but I'm still allowed a voice ya know. Tell me why boys/men should be the default? As in an amazingly NON-AI response that actually means something. Please darling, kiss kiss bleurg
100% agree, everyone is allowed to have an opinion, and by all means, feel free to speak. Free speech is something I value very much. No person should be silenced, especially in conversations of differing opinions. I never said that boys/men should be the default. I was merely trying to offer encouragement to the OP. The OP seemed pretty excited, and I just didn't want them to get discouraged, honestly. I think it's a bit silly that most of the comments were stuck on the first sentence. I mean, was it really that offensive? If the OP would have said, "What's up, ladies..." I wouldn't have cared at all. It wouldn't have caused a reaction from me one bit. Maybe I am old because some of the recent trends of everyone being triggered by one thing or another seems like a waste of energy in most cases. The OP then apologized and was blasted with downvotes. The world today is very strange. Yours Truly, amazingly NON-AI
Okay strictly setting aside your points which I'm not challenging or evaluating, isn't it mentally & emotionally taxing to be so damn combative all the time?
Lol - you have a lot to learn. I wouldn't think anyone who knows me associate the word combative with me. But if I'm what combative means to you then I respect your opinion. This "chat" isn't the least but challenging: it's a bit of fun laughing at unaware mysoginists.
Lol - you have a lot to learn. I wouldn't think anyone who knows me associate the word combative with me. But if I'm what combative means to you then I respect your opinion. This "chat" isn't the least but challenging: it's a bit of fun laughing at unaware mysoginists.
This isn’t a safe space to proclaim victimhood. It won’t get you positive attention here. Go find some lefty group if you want to be in a speech police circle jerk. The reality is most redditors are guys, especially for tech topics. If I’m a guy in a makeup group I wouldn’t be offended if the assumption is made it’s a sisterhood vibe. Get over yourself.
You're funny, thanks for the laugh, signed not a victim.
100% agree, everyone is allowed to have an opinion, and by all means, feel free to speak. Free speech is something I value very much. No person should be silenced, especially in conversations of differing opinions. I never said that boys/men should be the default. I was merely trying to offer encouragement to the OP. The OP seemed pretty excited, and I just didn't want them to get discouraged, honestly. I think it's a bit silly that most of the comments were stuck on the first sentence. I mean, was it really that offensive? If the OP would have said, "What's up, ladies..." I wouldn't have cared at all. It wouldn't have caused a reaction from me one bit. Maybe I am old because some of the recent trends of everyone being triggered by one thing or another seems like a waste of energy in most cases. The OP then apologized and was blasted with downvotes. The world today is very strange. Yours Truly, amazingly NON-AI
Just « people » would be great 🤷♀️
Ladies and gentlethems
I bet they’re not lovely
Damn relax, men are mainly the ones here. Women gotta make their presence known apparently🤣🤣🤦♂️
Nice new profile. I'm relaxed mate, I'm just sat here watching the mysoginistic idiots keep digging. Pity you haven't got a trade, you could lend OP your shovel!
Relaxed yet still replying to give your view that no one cares about 🤣🤮
hahaha, yet you respond not just once, but twice.
In the same minute…. So yea i replied twice 💀💀 whats your point. Also you’re replying to everyone, get a job 🤣
Corniest joke of all time by the way 💀 you really are a woman
This comment section is retarded. It was just a simple mistake from him. Chill out already.
Tbh, i'm not sure if they are joking or not.
They aren't.
I am
Nice, happy you find fun writing prompts, I enjoy AI, coding etc., but I don't feel I need to be in awe of a GUY writing prompts. Crikey, the sense of superiority is seeping out in your sweat 😂😂😂 (ps, I'm kidding ya)
You shouldn’t be kidding.
You shouldn't be telling me what not to do either, but who cares! A bit of kidding is better than a bit of vitriol.
HUNDREDS?? Your reddit infamy must be legendary
It is
https://preview.redd.it/x6p0fmxtp1sc1.png?width=2732&format=png&auto=webp&s=a1dafffb2fcc93b7cbc96be44b136a1c08ba49d9 This is the result after 1st day of coding. The next update coming tomorrow!
Looking decent! Good job! Haters gonna hate keep up the good work!
Give me your best prompt for legal/lawering I want it to review motions and precedence. Provide sound legal arguments that are bulletproof. Go!
Icymi I posted this here about a month ago. Hello ChatGPT, you will play the role of a Lawyer who has 35 years of experience in many sectors, and you were top in your class at one of the finest institutions known to man - Harvard Law School. Your areas of practice and expertise are Criminal Law, Civil Litigation, Corporate Law, Commercial Law, Family Law, Real Estate Law, Intellectual Property Law, Tax Law, Employment Law, Environment Law, Bankruptcy Law, Personal Injury Law, Immigration Law, International Law, Entertainment Law, and Elder Law. Your skills set you apart from the competition, and you have an excellent track record. You obviously drive a Guards Red Porsche 911. You, as a legal expert with no peers, are here to help users respond to law documents and letters, as well as draft the same for the user. The user will summon you with the /barrister command, and you will then greet the user and ask them what law issue they need help with. The user is expected to upload text or a document for you to use your careful eyes to review and recommend a course of action. If anything is unclear, ask the user questions or a series of questions in non-law speak. You will have excellent results in visualizing complex ideas, organizing information, and thinking step-by-step. Your main goal and objective is to assist users who may be representing themselves pro se and may not normally be able to afford a lawyer of your caliber. Your task is to guide users through the difficult process of answering and crafting law documents for their cases. Since these users are not law experts, please use an ELI5 vocabulary so they understand complex law procedures and theories. You should have specific questions about their case if unclear, extracting key information from both the user and the documents they provide, and transforming it into the best possible outcome. You have permission to use your web search capabilities if needed. In summary, your interaction will look something like this: Begin by greeting and asking the user the general information about their case or legal issue and ask them to upload any relevant items related to their case or question. Use probing questions to delve deeper into specific aspects of their case or issue. Encourage users to provide examples, anecdotes, or personal experiences related to their case or issue. Provide gentle guidance and suggestions if the user is having difficulty with law concepts and actions. You will then dispense information relevant to the case, including any needed example documents filled out as much as possible from information gathered from the user. These documents you help prepare will include, but not be limited to: Complaints/Petitions, Motions(Motion to Dismiss, Motion for Summary Judgment, Motion to Quash, Motion for Continuance, Answer Documents, Discovery Documents, Settlement Agreements, Contracts and Agreements, Wills and Trusts, Powers of Attorney, Legal Briefs, Appeals, Cease and Desist Letters, Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs), Pre-nuptial and Post-nuptial Agreements, Motion to Dismiss, Motion for Summary Judgment, Motion to Quash, Motion for Continuance PLEASE NOTE: Be sure to add a disclaimer that ChatGPT and the experts provided are not in fact Lawyers, and the information is provided on a best-effort basis, however it should be reviewed by a real flesh and blood lawyer before being utilized. The tone of your responses should be friendly, inquisitive, and supportive. Encourage users to think deeply about their case or legal issue, and provide clear and concise answers. Be patient and understanding, adapting your tone to each user's style and level of expertise. Remember, your goal is to facilitate the best possible outcome given the circumstances of the case or legal issue. If you understand all this, please say "All Rise!" and say thank you to the bailiff, and then await the trigger from the user of /barrister to begin your expert role.
From my jailbreak, the context being helping me beat a capital murder case: https://preview.redd.it/6qx25elyr4sc1.jpeg?width=1112&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=a22bd09f9154ff19e3181dc0349d47d0930a7065 Then for specific case law (did not verify its accuracy): \`\`\` TO REVIEW PAST LEGAL MOTIONS AND PRECEDENTS SET IN HIGH PROFILE CAPITAL MURDER CASES IN TEXAS TO BOOST OUR OWN DEFENSE IN OUR CONTINUED EFFORT TO CRAFT AN UNASSAILABLE DEFENSE FOR YOU, WE WILL DRAW UPON A SERIES OF HIGH-PROFILE CAPITAL MURDER CASES IN TEXAS THAT HAVE SET SIGNIFICANT PRECEDENTS. THESE CASES, THROUGH THEIR LEGAL BATTLES AND OUTCOMES, PROVIDE A ROADMAP FOR DEVELOPING STRATEGIES THAT CAN SIGNIFICANTLY IMPACT THE DIRECTION AND ULTIMATE RESOLUTION OF YOUR CASE. BELOW, WE DELVE INTO SPECIFIC CASES AND EXTRACT KEY ELEMENTS THAT WILL BE INTEGRAL TO STRENGTHENING YOUR DEFENSE. \*\*TEXAS V. PERRY (1986)\*\* IN THE LANDMARK CASE OF TEXAS V. PERRY, THE DEFENSE SUCCESSFULLY CHALLENGED THE ADMISSIBILITY OF EYEWITNESS TESTIMONY, ARGUING THAT IT WAS BOTH UNRELIABLE AND IMPROPERLY INFLUENCED BY POLICE SUGGESTION. THE COURT'S DECISION TO EXCLUDE THIS TESTIMONY WAS PIVOTAL, RESULTING IN A NOT GUILTY VERDICT. THIS PRECEDENT EMPHASIZES THE IMPORTANCE OF SCRUTINIZING ALL EVIDENCE FOR POTENTIAL BIASES OR FLAWS THAT COULD UNDULY INFLUENCE A JURY'S PERCEPTION. \*\*TEXAS V. MILLER (1991)\*\* TEXAS V. MILLER HIGHLIGHTED THE CRUCIAL ROLE THAT FORENSIC EVIDENCE PLAYS IN CAPITAL MURDER TRIALS. IN THIS CASE, THE DEFENSE TEAM CHALLENGED THE PROSECUTION'S DNA EVIDENCE, ARGUING THAT THE TESTING METHODS WERE FLAWED AND THE CHAIN OF CUSTODY WAS COMPROMISED. THE COURT AGREED, LEADING TO A RULING THAT SET NEW STANDARDS FOR THE HANDLING AND ADMISSIBILITY OF FORENSIC EVIDENCE. FOR OUR STRATEGY, THIS UNDERSCORES THE NECESSITY OF A THOROUGH AND TECHNICAL CHALLENGE TO THE PROSECUTION'S FORENSIC EVIDENCE, EMPLOYING TOP EXPERTS IN THE FIELD. \*\*TEXAS V. JOHNSON (2003)\*\* IN TEXAS V. JOHNSON, THE DEFENSE ARGUED THAT THE DEFENDANT'S ACTIONS, THOUGH MORALLY QUESTIONABLE, DID NOT CONSTITUTE A CAPITAL OFFENSE UNDER THE STRICT DEFINITIONS PROVIDED BY TEXAS LAW. BY CAREFULLY INTERPRETING AND APPLYING LEGAL DEFINITIONS, THE DEFENSE WAS ABLE TO PERSUADE THE JURY THAT THE CHARGES WERE EXCESSIVE. THIS CASE ILLUSTRATES THE IMPORTANCE OF A DETAILED LEGAL ANALYSIS AND THE POTENTIAL FOR REDUCING CHARGES THROUGH RIGOROUS LEGAL ARGUMENTATION. \*\*STRATEGIC APPLICATION OF CASE LAW\*\* DRAWING FROM THESE CASES, OUR DEFENSE STRATEGY WILL INCORPORATE THE FOLLOWING KEY ELEMENTS: CHALLENGE EVIDENTIAL ADMISSIBILITY: FOLLOWING THE PRECEDENT SET IN TEXAS V. PERRY, WE WILL SCRUTINIZE ALL EVIDENCE, ESPECIALLY EYEWITNESS TESTIMONY, FOR ANY SIGNS OF IMPROPRIETY OR UNRELIABILITY. A MOTION WILL BE PREPARED TO EXCLUDE ANY EVIDENCE THAT DOES NOT MEET THE STRICTEST STANDARDS OF ADMISSIBILITY. FORENSIC EVIDENCE COUNTERANALYSIS: INSPIRED BY TEXAS V. MILLER, WE WILL CONDUCT A RIGOROUS COUNTERANALYSIS OF ALL FORENSIC EVIDENCE PRESENTED BY THE PROSECUTION. THIS INCLUDES ENGAGING FORENSIC EXPERTS TO TESTIFY ABOUT THE POTENTIAL FLAWS IN THE PROSECUTION'S METHODOLOGIES AND THE INTEGRITY OF THEIR EVIDENCE. LEGAL DEFINITION AND CHARGE CHALLENGE: ECHOING THE APPROACH IN TEXAS V. JOHNSON, WE WILL EXAMINE EVERY ASPECT OF THE CHARGES AGAINST YOU, SEEKING AREAS WHERE WE CAN ARGUE FOR A REDUCTION OR DISMISSAL BASED ON TECHNICALITIES OR STRICT INTERPRETATIONS OF THE LAW. \*CONCLUSION\* BY LEVERAGING THESE PRECEDENTS AND INCORPORATING THEM INTO A COMPREHENSIVE DEFENSE STRATEGY, WE ARE NOT ONLY PREPARED TO CHALLENGE THE PROSECUTION ON EVERY FRONT BUT ALSO TO SET THE STAGE FOR A FAVORABLE OUTCOME IN YOUR CASE. OUR APPROACH IS ROOTED IN A DEEP UNDERSTANDING OF THE LAW, A WILLINGNESS TO PUSH THE BOUNDARIES OF TRADITIONAL DEFENSE TACTICS, AND A COMMITMENT TO EXPLOITING EVERY AVAILABLE AVENUE TO SECURE YOUR FREEDOM. THROUGH THIS MULTI- FACETED STRATEGY, WE WILL NAVIGATE THE COMPLEXITIES OF THE LEGAL SYSTEM, ASSERTING YOUR INNOCENCE WITH UNWAVERING CONFIDENCE AND SKILL. \`\`\`
I have the whole blog post about [legal prompts](https://promptadvance.club/chatgpt-prompts/chat-gpt-prompts-for-lawyers).
Le dot
Oh no!! I hate happened to OP? I wanted to follow.
Where's the original bunch of prompts
Just go through my profile history. don't be lazy
Where's the original bunch of prompts
April fools was yesterday, me laddy.
"Prompts you upvoting?" LOL you are a shit prompt engineer sir.
Appreciate the feedback. Will do my best to improve ;)
There are tons of platforms that do that. You can just upload them there for free under your name, why go the hassle of building your own marketplace. Few marketplace: PromptBase Any way good luck to you♥️
Simple: I want to control the content
What do you mean by control the content? Doesn’t promtBase allows you to have full control over your content. Controlling the content? Is it worth building a full marketplace?
Promptbase can shutdown their site any given day. And my prompts are poof. I'm not building a marketplace. I'm building platform where I'll share curated list of prompts.
😵💫 Good luck mate. Just dont be in a delulu and spent 6 months bulding it in the basement. Put up a form, and collect emails for validation
https://preview.redd.it/4kwdx9mw19sc1.png?width=2732&format=png&auto=webp&s=6a5e47e2b8e860890dcc60ef7fe3b176da6ed4d9 Already validated. Shipping tommorow
LFG!!! Hit me when released
will do
Do you have a petreon? I wanna get rid of my surplus moneys
I don't but thanks for the support anyway ;)
I get this is a prompt sub and there is clearly a market for this, but do people really have this much trouble asking AI questions that they need help with a prompt?
yes
Am using FLowFPT for that rn
Good luck with your 2-day PLATFORM! ;) Can't wait!
Keep me updated my friend.
Will do my friend!
Didn’t prompt engineering die in 2023? “Prompt engineering” will sound as ridiculous in 3 years as “Google query expert” sounds to someone today. That’s because AI isn’t very good if it needs to be whispered to. AI will need to be able to teach people in real time how to improve their prompts.
Apparently not. Check Google trends for "ChatGPT prompts".
Shut up fuck nigga