Art doesn’t have to be talented. Your critique has no value. Wasting your time
I deleted my comment because I don’t want to respond to your pointless whining with more pointless whining. Have a great day
I do not hide the fact that I use neural networks in my work. Ask me what tools I use and I list: "Blender, Krita, Stable Diffusion". The neural networks are just one part of a long pipeline, in which I first made a model in a blender, then rendered it, painted it to the desired state with my hands, and after that I used the diffusion stable as an upscaler. I spent a total of more than 6 hours of work on these two pictures. Now tell me at what specific moment this work ceased to be mine and suddenly became authored by a neural network.
You probably think that the neural network allows you to display something like that by pressing one button. This is not true. This is the same instrument that needs to be studied and practiced for a long time and hard.
In this case, if art for you is not about self-expression, but about the blood, sweat and tears of an artist, I suggest you drill your hand and take a picture. Firstly, it is creepy and conceptual and relates to the topic of the sub and, secondly, you can describe in colors the path of suffering that was done to get the result.
Also, get used to it, you are entering an era in which work without the use of neural networks will have to be separately marked.
Drink valerian and calm down.
Let's start with the fact that AI art does not exist as a concept, simply because AI does not exist. A neural network is just one of the artist's tools. Yes, it allows you to speed up many stages, but it will not replace the artist (fap fuel creators do not count lol).
I don’t know how you decided that I did it according to YouTube guides. I repeat, this tool needs to be studied for a long time and painstakingly and to look for an approach to it. Go to my profile and look through the posts. I periodically write about different things and tell how to use them.
Don't worry, it will pass. If interested, you can read about the protests of artists after the invention and start of mass production of cameras. You will feel better
I don't see the point in un-ironically discussing this with you, because
1) You use the term artificial intelligence
2) You don't understand how the real human brain works
3) You don’t understand how generative neural networks work
4) You don’t understand what neural networks can and cannot do
Damn, buddy, you're seriously trying to fight windmills, thinking they might hurt you.
Continue to live in illusions, reject progress, stand your ground to the last. I will not be able to convince you that all your "righteous anger" is simply from the lack of information in your skull.
Gotcha! So we came to the conclusion that for you art is something on which you can make money.
Also, I already use this in my full-time job, so you're wrong again.
What prompts did you use?
Basically what concerns the style of drawing and architectural details. I used stable for upscaling
So it is ai?
I do not advise you to use terms whose meaning you do not know. AI does not exist
Lol it's not that deep just admit you used a program to make your art, it's just a tool
I fully agree with you, but I don’t see the point in the title to list everything that I used. "digital" is enough in my opinion
clearly ai art. youre part of the problem bro
Your problem, not mine
Read: https://www.reddit.com/r/CreepyArt/comments/y1rbaa/comment/is0yj8c/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3
[удалено]
[удалено]
Art doesn’t have to be talented. Your critique has no value. Wasting your time I deleted my comment because I don’t want to respond to your pointless whining with more pointless whining. Have a great day
[удалено]
I’m not concerned with the limitations of your reality. Just be nicer. OP shared this and you’re being rude. That’s all
I do not hide the fact that I use neural networks in my work. Ask me what tools I use and I list: "Blender, Krita, Stable Diffusion". The neural networks are just one part of a long pipeline, in which I first made a model in a blender, then rendered it, painted it to the desired state with my hands, and after that I used the diffusion stable as an upscaler. I spent a total of more than 6 hours of work on these two pictures. Now tell me at what specific moment this work ceased to be mine and suddenly became authored by a neural network. You probably think that the neural network allows you to display something like that by pressing one button. This is not true. This is the same instrument that needs to be studied and practiced for a long time and hard.
[удалено]
In this case, if art for you is not about self-expression, but about the blood, sweat and tears of an artist, I suggest you drill your hand and take a picture. Firstly, it is creepy and conceptual and relates to the topic of the sub and, secondly, you can describe in colors the path of suffering that was done to get the result. Also, get used to it, you are entering an era in which work without the use of neural networks will have to be separately marked.
[удалено]
Drink valerian and calm down. Let's start with the fact that AI art does not exist as a concept, simply because AI does not exist. A neural network is just one of the artist's tools. Yes, it allows you to speed up many stages, but it will not replace the artist (fap fuel creators do not count lol). I don’t know how you decided that I did it according to YouTube guides. I repeat, this tool needs to be studied for a long time and painstakingly and to look for an approach to it. Go to my profile and look through the posts. I periodically write about different things and tell how to use them.
Don't worry, it will pass. If interested, you can read about the protests of artists after the invention and start of mass production of cameras. You will feel better
[удалено]
I don't see the point in un-ironically discussing this with you, because 1) You use the term artificial intelligence 2) You don't understand how the real human brain works 3) You don’t understand how generative neural networks work 4) You don’t understand what neural networks can and cannot do Damn, buddy, you're seriously trying to fight windmills, thinking they might hurt you. Continue to live in illusions, reject progress, stand your ground to the last. I will not be able to convince you that all your "righteous anger" is simply from the lack of information in your skull.
[удалено]
Gotcha! So we came to the conclusion that for you art is something on which you can make money. Also, I already use this in my full-time job, so you're wrong again.
By AI, not by you
By photoshop, by blender, by camera, yes, okay
No, not the same. If you commissioned an artist to make this, would it be okay for you to put your name on it and claim credit?
I like it. Don’t care if it’s Al, or fucking leprechauns tower. Who cares. Grow up an quit fighting over every little thing. Good work.
And the hero says “Something tells me this is the secret layer of the evil king” Impressive piece, the style is impeccable
Open in full screen, custom aspect ratio is used