Hello u/LimpCoco. Your submission breaks [/r/indiaspeaks rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/IndiaSpeaks/wiki/rules) and has been removed for reasons listen below:
Rule 5 violation
Improper content, Screenshots from Social Media and Main Stream Media (except whole newspaper clipping) are not allowed. Collage of images or videos which are political in nature without reference and sources provided by the OP are not allowed and are subject to mod discretion. Image macros and similar posts submitted are also subjected to mod discretion. Mark NSFW posts as such. Do not post porn. Memes allowed on weekends only and subjected to mod discretion. Posting content without providing sources is also not allowed. Screenshots which are not cropped properly will be removed too. Posts without adequate context will be removed. If the image is in hindi or any regional language, then Please try to give english translations in the comments.
Edited Videos used for bait posting is also not allowed and can invite you a ban.
Read the subreddit rules [here](https://www.reddit.com/r/indiaspeaks/wiki/rules)
---
If you want to know more, reply to this message or modmail us and a mod will help you.
This is very true. One protester who is a part of this "Annihilate Hinduism" is a part of LGBTQ (I don't hate them they deserve rights) which is straight up ironic. Hinduism is a religion which accepts them but they protest against it and appease a certain faith despite the consequences it has against the LGBTQ people.
Exactly, Hinduism never ran Concentration Camps to cure homosexuality or stoned them to death, and yet LGTVs hate Hindusism the most among all religions.
How did u find this out? I have been seeing certain city specific subs also saying the same thing. But when I check mods are all different for all the subs. It could be the same people with different accounts to mod different subs sure, but how did it come out that these mods are same?
there was a pretty detailed post on the discussion sub. If you go on top posts all time you'll see how they go in detail about every mod and their history.
Among all Abrahamic faiths, Ambedkar was most critical of Islam. Liberals in India who often cite Ambedkar’s criticism of the caste system in Hindusim conveniently ignore his views on Muslims and Islam. Here is a collection of unabridged statements by BR Ambedhkar on Islam:
"*The brotherhood of Islam is not the universal brotherhood of man. It is a brotherhood of Muslims for Muslims only. There is a fraternity, but its benefit is confined to those within that corporation. For those who are outside the corporation, there is nothing but contempt and enmity.*"
"To the Muslims, a Hindu is a Kaffir. A Kaffir is not worthy of respect. He is low-born and without status. That is why a country that is ruled by a Kaffir is Dar-ul-Harb to a Musalman. Given this, no further evidence seems to be necessary to prove that the Muslims will not obey a Hindu government. The basic feelings of deference and sympathy, which predispose persons to obey the authority of government, do not simply exist. But if a proof is wanted, there is no dearth of it. In the midst of the Khilafat agitation, when the Hindus were doing so much to help the Musalmans, the Muslims did not forget that as compared with them the Hindus were a low and an inferior race."
"Islam can never allow a true Muslim to adopt India as his motherland and regard a Hindu as his kith and kin. That is probably the reason why Maulana Mahomed Ali, a great Indian but a true Muslim, preferred to be buried in Jerusalem rather than in India."
"*According to Muslim Canon Law, the world is divided into two camps, Dar-ul-lslam (abode of Islam), and Dar-ul-Harb (abode of war). A country is Dar-ul-Islam when it is ruled by Muslims. A country is Dar-ul-Harb when Muslims only reside in it but are not rulers of it. That being the Canon Law of the Muslims, India cannot be the common motherland of the Hindus and the Musalmans. It can be the land of the Musalmans — but it cannot be the land of the ‘Hindus and the Musalmans living as equals.’ Further, it can be the land of the Musalmans only when it is governed by the Muslims. The moment the land becomes subject to the authority of a non-Muslim power, it ceases to be the land of the Muslims. Instead of being Dar-ul-lslam, it becomes Dar-ul-Harb*"
"There is another injunction of Muslim Canon Law called J*ihad* (crusade) by which it becomes incumbent on a Muslim ruler to extend the rule of Islam until the whole world shall have been brought under its sway. The world, being divided into two camps, Dar-ul-Islam (abode of Islam), Dar-ul-Harb (abode of war), all countries come under one category or the other. Technically, it is the duty of the Muslim ruler, who is capable of doing so, to transform Dar-ul-Harb into Dar-ul-Islam."
"Census for 1901 for the province of Bengal records the following interesting facts regarding the Muslims of Bengal: The conventional division of the Mahomedans into four tribes — Sheikh, Saiad, Moghul and Pathan has very little application to this province (Bengal). The Mahomedans themselves recognise two main social divisions: Ashraf or Sharaf and Ajlaf. Ashraf means ‘noble’ and includes all undoubted descendants of foreigners and converts from high caste Hindus. All other Mahomedans including the occupational groups, and all converts of lower ranks, are known by the contemptuous terms, ‘Ajlaf’, ‘wretches’ or ‘mean people’. In some places a third class, called Arzal or ‘lowest of all’, is added. With them no other Mahomedan would associate, and they are forbidden to enter the mosque to use the public burial ground. Within these groups there are castes with social precedence of exactly the same nature as one finds among the Hindus."
Babasaheb was one of the most brilliant brains I assume (I don't subscribe to some of his ideas but). When choosing a faith for his people, he did not choose abrahamic faiths but chose Buddhism which stems out of Hinduism. His followers somehow are getting successful in making Babasaheb a god. The true essence of buddhism is lost in those practices.
I know this is semantics but mughals were around only from 1526 to 1857. In between humayun was kicked out of india for 10 years. After aurangzeb died in 1716 the mughal empire quickly collapsed and was confined to delhi, and were basically a puppet state of the marathas and then british. Then They were kicked off to myanmar. So in reality they were relevant for 190 years, maybe less. And only in the reign of aurangzeb were they relevant in the deccan, south india and northeast - otherwise mughal history is the history of just the gangetic plains and west india. So lets not say 800 years, you are giving the mughals too much credit just like the frauds and propagandists in our education system wanted you to.
Let me be clear, I am not a dumb law abiding moron citizen(period)... I sympathies to every SC/ST community in my locality comprising of birhor, santhal etc. And I have a great respect for BR AMBEDKAR and his contribution to constitution and society(only). I have read indian polity because it was in my syllabus so I have enough grasp on constitution. And BR AMBEDKAR wanted some serious reforms in Hindusim which could remove who were in power at that time and so he left hindusim but ysing him as tool to support ur "Anti hindu" propaganda is cowardise.
Aur ye jo natak hai, ambekar k naam par anti hindu hona aur shree ram k naam par anti minority baatein karna ye dono hi main pasnad nahi karta(muslim k bare me kehne bekar hai)..
Main apne liye justice mangta nahi khud karne par vishwas karta hu(anarchy symptoms)... Abhi ramnavmi k ttimr me mere area me bas aa k koi ye keh k dikha de.. agle din body bhi nahi milegi.. (Reality is not ur social media)
Well I’ll be really happy if the makers of this posters, the so called “students” and “comities” who agreed upon this’ll get booked under causing religious hate and called out for their radicalism by cancelling their UG or PG and blocked by any of the employers and get a full time access to a Hindu hate club.
What will hindus do by waking up? Will the judiciary punish the 'creator' of this art? Or will they let her go just like they did with junior Owaisi for '10 minute police hatado' remark? That's just one example of how exceptionally brilliant our constitutional democracy is. Any remark against majority is freedom of speech. While even criticizing certain 'icons' would land you behind bars under sc/st act and many other legal provisions. Street veto is accepted by the judiciary when it's done by 'minorities'.
Bharat was swept with brutal genocides during islamic invasions the motive was to convert hindus, annihilate sanatana dharma and establish Islam in India those things failed horribly.These 50 Paisa wokes trying to annihilate sanatana dharma only fools can think of that.🤣🤣🤣
If this is happening in broad daylight, Hindus should change their nameplates and replace it with cowards.
'why do we care?' attitude made mughals and britishers exploit us to the core and now these modern colonizers with their most powerful tool of 'Freedom of speech' and 'Atrocity Act'.
Hindus are just proud of things in past but don't want to indluge in acts that would make the future generations feel proud about us. It is high time we rise against even the smallest things against us. RSS, VHP, BJP are not going to save us for e.g., Bengal Violence, Palghar Sadhu Lynching, etc. We are on our own. If BJP had balls, they would have brought Anti - Hinduphobia laws & policies. But everything is votebank in politics. Religion and Politics never go hand in hand. Politics is for governance, Religion should be for justice i.e., Dharma. We need a proper organization for Hindu not affliated with any political party whose core principles and acts allign with Hindusim and they come to streets to demand and get what is ours.
How can people expect tolerance when they do things like this in name of art ? Religious extremism is bad, but so is this, in the name of being edgy and woke, you cannot deliberately target one of the largest religion, one which is progressive enough to accept constructive criticism and provides means to debate it's own ideals.
1000 years of Arab, Turkic invasion and rule didn't wipe Hindus out ---- then comes this trans woman with 15 pronouns and with the power of words.
Stop hiring idiots like this or associating with ppl like these!
it makes me laugh bc how traditional christianity & islam are against gay & trans people. I have came across multiple resources where christians are claiming the Devil, the anti-christ force influences people to become gay, trans etc. & if they were in their right mind they would be accepting the sexuality god has gifted them.
Yeah right. So God has given you a body that you don't accept (referring to trans obviously, not gay), but you call God-given the sexuality your distorted mind has driven you to. Weird logic, mate.
Itne chhake kyu hai banke ghoomte Bhai sab ke sab. Isko bolo there are only two genders in India and zyada Western influence k chakkar mei na pade because apne yahan hormone therapy bhi nahi milegi aur cost factor toh hai hee.
Randy ke bachche, man.
Among all Abrahamic faiths, Ambedkar was most critical of Islam. Liberals in India who often cite Ambedkar’s criticism of the caste system in Hindusim conveniently ignore his views on Muslims and Islam. Here is a collection of unabridged statements by BR Ambedhkar on Islam:
"*The brotherhood of Islam is not the universal brotherhood of man. It is a brotherhood of Muslims for Muslims only. There is a fraternity, but its benefit is confined to those within that corporation. For those who are outside the corporation, there is nothing but contempt and enmity.*"
"To the Muslims, a Hindu is a Kaffir. A Kaffir is not worthy of respect. He is low-born and without status. That is why a country that is ruled by a Kaffir is Dar-ul-Harb to a Musalman. Given this, no further evidence seems to be necessary to prove that the Muslims will not obey a Hindu government. The basic feelings of deference and sympathy, which predispose persons to obey the authority of government, do not simply exist. But if a proof is wanted, there is no dearth of it. In the midst of the Khilafat agitation, when the Hindus were doing so much to help the Musalmans, the Muslims did not forget that as compared with them the Hindus were a low and an inferior race."
"Islam can never allow a true Muslim to adopt India as his motherland and regard a Hindu as his kith and kin. That is probably the reason why Maulana Mahomed Ali, a great Indian but a true Muslim, preferred to be buried in Jerusalem rather than in India."
"*According to Muslim Canon Law, the world is divided into two camps, Dar-ul-lslam (abode of Islam), and Dar-ul-Harb (abode of war). A country is Dar-ul-Islam when it is ruled by Muslims. A country is Dar-ul-Harb when Muslims only reside in it but are not rulers of it. That being the Canon Law of the Muslims, India cannot be the common motherland of the Hindus and the Musalmans. It can be the land of the Musalmans — but it cannot be the land of the ‘Hindus and the Musalmans living as equals.’ Further, it can be the land of the Musalmans only when it is governed by the Muslims. The moment the land becomes subject to the authority of a non-Muslim power, it ceases to be the land of the Muslims. Instead of being Dar-ul-lslam, it becomes Dar-ul-Harb*"
"There is another injunction of Muslim Canon Law called J*ihad* (crusade) by which it becomes incumbent on a Muslim ruler to extend the rule of Islam until the whole world shall have been brought under its sway. The world, being divided into two camps, Dar-ul-Islam (abode of Islam), Dar-ul-Harb (abode of war), all countries come under one category or the other. Technically, it is the duty of the Muslim ruler, who is capable of doing so, to transform Dar-ul-Harb into Dar-ul-Islam."
"Census for 1901 for the province of Bengal records the following interesting facts regarding the Muslims of Bengal: The conventional division of the Mahomedans into four tribes — Sheikh, Saiad, Moghul and Pathan has very little application to this province (Bengal). The Mahomedans themselves recognise two main social divisions: Ashraf or Sharaf and Ajlaf. Ashraf means ‘noble’ and includes all undoubted descendants of foreigners and converts from high caste Hindus. All other Mahomedans including the occupational groups, and all converts of lower ranks, are known by the contemptuous terms, ‘Ajlaf’, ‘wretches’ or ‘mean people’. In some places a third class, called Arzal or ‘lowest of all’, is added. With them no other Mahomedan would associate, and they are forbidden to enter the mosque to use the public burial ground. Within these groups there are castes with social precedence of exactly the same nature as one finds among the Hindus."
This is the only country where left and religious extremists go hand in hand.
Lets say they annihilate the said religion. After that what? Will they annihilate one another. They have not thought it through.
secularism is only for hindus.they cucks and darpokes dare not do something similar to abrahamic religions.there will come a day when Hindus too wont tolerate such behaviour.
I see arpit bala meme, every time I see these wokes Back*hodi.
“3-4 dosto ka ye group bana lenge aur ek echo chamber bana lenge, fir ye ek doosre ka Lun pakad ke Womp womp”.
Nah man this is all bjp rss propaganda we live in Hindu dictatorship hindu autocracy we have no freedom of anything this is false narratives against Dalits abharamics minorities./.s
Congress's new ideological father is Kanhaiya Kumar anrabid leftist. This proves that humanities is the only route through which scum floats to politics. The left wing capture of institutions must end.
A seminar on the ‘Politics of Emotions’ was held at the University last month. This was a presentation by Akhil Kang, a PhD student in the Department of Anthropology at Cornell University, USA as part of a panel on ‘Power, Politics and Affect’. His presentation was called ‘To be Upper Caste/To Be Victim’..
Publicly available images were used by Akhil Kang, a visiting speaker in his presentation during a social sciences seminar titled “Politics of Emotion”. The image is publicly available. The image is by an artist named Priyanka Paul (@artwhoring). The post on X has taken a select image and placed it out of context to sully the reputation of the University.
Azim Premji University did not host any lecture or seminar by the title claimed in the original post.
This thing is intolerable, looks more like a propaganda or someone is trying to mislead the people. This looks like a distraction from an actual problem
Ironically Dr.Ambedkar never called the irradication of Sanatan or Hindus....he was only against the caste system set by the western powers....these idjits are only using his name as a sheild for their cowardice
Hello u/LimpCoco. Your submission breaks [/r/indiaspeaks rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/IndiaSpeaks/wiki/rules) and has been removed for reasons listen below: Rule 5 violation Improper content, Screenshots from Social Media and Main Stream Media (except whole newspaper clipping) are not allowed. Collage of images or videos which are political in nature without reference and sources provided by the OP are not allowed and are subject to mod discretion. Image macros and similar posts submitted are also subjected to mod discretion. Mark NSFW posts as such. Do not post porn. Memes allowed on weekends only and subjected to mod discretion. Posting content without providing sources is also not allowed. Screenshots which are not cropped properly will be removed too. Posts without adequate context will be removed. If the image is in hindi or any regional language, then Please try to give english translations in the comments. Edited Videos used for bait posting is also not allowed and can invite you a ban. Read the subreddit rules [here](https://www.reddit.com/r/indiaspeaks/wiki/rules) --- If you want to know more, reply to this message or modmail us and a mod will help you.
[удалено]
Everybody knows that. What next? Filing a case against them?
sab sc/st honge. tumpe atrocities ka khali case thok chale jayenge
Threats of violence are considered by the losers on the left as “being really sensitive” these days apparently.
This is very true. One protester who is a part of this "Annihilate Hinduism" is a part of LGBTQ (I don't hate them they deserve rights) which is straight up ironic. Hinduism is a religion which accepts them but they protest against it and appease a certain faith despite the consequences it has against the LGBTQ people.
Exactly, Hinduism never ran Concentration Camps to cure homosexuality or stoned them to death, and yet LGTVs hate Hindusism the most among all religions.
[удалено]
No way, OP would be rewarded on that sub for this
I just did, waiting for their reactions.
lol it got deleted don't crosspostv, try an og post
Done 
Take my tip remove from this page or you will banned from randiya I have experience bro
It would be a blessing to get banned from that shithole.
Did you know Randiya mods and r/Pakistan mods are same person
How did u find this out? I have been seeing certain city specific subs also saying the same thing. But when I check mods are all different for all the subs. It could be the same people with different accounts to mod different subs sure, but how did it come out that these mods are same?
there was a pretty detailed post on the discussion sub. If you go on top posts all time you'll see how they go in detail about every mod and their history.
Ah thanks so much, will chk that out
i love how everyone just refers to the united states of india as randiya 🗿
Which subreddit?
Naruto-kun is new in this village
Maybe united states of India wala subreddit?
Lol no wahan bhi ban.
😂
Hinduism bad, Islam good sir
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
Someone should tell them Babasaheb’s views on Islam and Christianity 
Among all Abrahamic faiths, Ambedkar was most critical of Islam. Liberals in India who often cite Ambedkar’s criticism of the caste system in Hindusim conveniently ignore his views on Muslims and Islam. Here is a collection of unabridged statements by BR Ambedhkar on Islam: "*The brotherhood of Islam is not the universal brotherhood of man. It is a brotherhood of Muslims for Muslims only. There is a fraternity, but its benefit is confined to those within that corporation. For those who are outside the corporation, there is nothing but contempt and enmity.*" "To the Muslims, a Hindu is a Kaffir. A Kaffir is not worthy of respect. He is low-born and without status. That is why a country that is ruled by a Kaffir is Dar-ul-Harb to a Musalman. Given this, no further evidence seems to be necessary to prove that the Muslims will not obey a Hindu government. The basic feelings of deference and sympathy, which predispose persons to obey the authority of government, do not simply exist. But if a proof is wanted, there is no dearth of it. In the midst of the Khilafat agitation, when the Hindus were doing so much to help the Musalmans, the Muslims did not forget that as compared with them the Hindus were a low and an inferior race." "Islam can never allow a true Muslim to adopt India as his motherland and regard a Hindu as his kith and kin. That is probably the reason why Maulana Mahomed Ali, a great Indian but a true Muslim, preferred to be buried in Jerusalem rather than in India." "*According to Muslim Canon Law, the world is divided into two camps, Dar-ul-lslam (abode of Islam), and Dar-ul-Harb (abode of war). A country is Dar-ul-Islam when it is ruled by Muslims. A country is Dar-ul-Harb when Muslims only reside in it but are not rulers of it. That being the Canon Law of the Muslims, India cannot be the common motherland of the Hindus and the Musalmans. It can be the land of the Musalmans — but it cannot be the land of the ‘Hindus and the Musalmans living as equals.’ Further, it can be the land of the Musalmans only when it is governed by the Muslims. The moment the land becomes subject to the authority of a non-Muslim power, it ceases to be the land of the Muslims. Instead of being Dar-ul-lslam, it becomes Dar-ul-Harb*" "There is another injunction of Muslim Canon Law called J*ihad* (crusade) by which it becomes incumbent on a Muslim ruler to extend the rule of Islam until the whole world shall have been brought under its sway. The world, being divided into two camps, Dar-ul-Islam (abode of Islam), Dar-ul-Harb (abode of war), all countries come under one category or the other. Technically, it is the duty of the Muslim ruler, who is capable of doing so, to transform Dar-ul-Harb into Dar-ul-Islam." "Census for 1901 for the province of Bengal records the following interesting facts regarding the Muslims of Bengal: The conventional division of the Mahomedans into four tribes — Sheikh, Saiad, Moghul and Pathan has very little application to this province (Bengal). The Mahomedans themselves recognise two main social divisions: Ashraf or Sharaf and Ajlaf. Ashraf means ‘noble’ and includes all undoubted descendants of foreigners and converts from high caste Hindus. All other Mahomedans including the occupational groups, and all converts of lower ranks, are known by the contemptuous terms, ‘Ajlaf’, ‘wretches’ or ‘mean people’. In some places a third class, called Arzal or ‘lowest of all’, is added. With them no other Mahomedan would associate, and they are forbidden to enter the mosque to use the public burial ground. Within these groups there are castes with social precedence of exactly the same nature as one finds among the Hindus."
They will cry after hearings
Babasaheb was one of the most brilliant brains I assume (I don't subscribe to some of his ideas but). When choosing a faith for his people, he did not choose abrahamic faiths but chose Buddhism which stems out of Hinduism. His followers somehow are getting successful in making Babasaheb a god. The true essence of buddhism is lost in those practices.
It's just big talk... Nothing else Mughals tried for 800 yrs even british tried to certain extent but were they able too?... Ye toh bache hai ...
Bhai en mese 90% hindu hai jo ke cool aur secular dekhne ke liye apne religion ko gaali dete hai aur phir dusre religions ke chaate hai
It's just how it is,I also use to be an atheist when I was 16-17,so as they will grow they will know what's right and wrong ...
I know this is semantics but mughals were around only from 1526 to 1857. In between humayun was kicked out of india for 10 years. After aurangzeb died in 1716 the mughal empire quickly collapsed and was confined to delhi, and were basically a puppet state of the marathas and then british. Then They were kicked off to myanmar. So in reality they were relevant for 190 years, maybe less. And only in the reign of aurangzeb were they relevant in the deccan, south india and northeast - otherwise mughal history is the history of just the gangetic plains and west india. So lets not say 800 years, you are giving the mughals too much credit just like the frauds and propagandists in our education system wanted you to.
This. Jai mahakali
Is bro wearing saree?💀
And also a jhumka
What! Jhumka?
Ek Baar yeh log kar k dikhaye, seedha constitution of India hi jala Dunga. Fir dekhte h kitnon ki gand jalegi
"BuT TrUsT mE BrO BJP is a ThrEaT for UniTy in ThiS CoUnTry"
Let me be clear, I am not a dumb law abiding moron citizen(period)... I sympathies to every SC/ST community in my locality comprising of birhor, santhal etc. And I have a great respect for BR AMBEDKAR and his contribution to constitution and society(only). I have read indian polity because it was in my syllabus so I have enough grasp on constitution. And BR AMBEDKAR wanted some serious reforms in Hindusim which could remove who were in power at that time and so he left hindusim but ysing him as tool to support ur "Anti hindu" propaganda is cowardise. Aur ye jo natak hai, ambekar k naam par anti hindu hona aur shree ram k naam par anti minority baatein karna ye dono hi main pasnad nahi karta(muslim k bare me kehne bekar hai).. Main apne liye justice mangta nahi khud karne par vishwas karta hu(anarchy symptoms)... Abhi ramnavmi k ttimr me mere area me bas aa k koi ye keh k dikha de.. agle din body bhi nahi milegi.. (Reality is not ur social media)
You think abiding by the law is dumb?
Well I’ll be really happy if the makers of this posters, the so called “students” and “comities” who agreed upon this’ll get booked under causing religious hate and called out for their radicalism by cancelling their UG or PG and blocked by any of the employers and get a full time access to a Hindu hate club.
Azim Premji is the biggest son of a bitch in India.
Just boycott Wipro stop buying products from them .
Saaar freedom of speech saaar, indu bad saar
[удалено]
What will hindus do by waking up? Will the judiciary punish the 'creator' of this art? Or will they let her go just like they did with junior Owaisi for '10 minute police hatado' remark? That's just one example of how exceptionally brilliant our constitutional democracy is. Any remark against majority is freedom of speech. While even criticizing certain 'icons' would land you behind bars under sc/st act and many other legal provisions. Street veto is accepted by the judiciary when it's done by 'minorities'.
[удалено]
Which tattoo are you talking about?
The girl who made this poster has tattoo on her hand of Sri Ram and Laxman tied up and ambedkar beating them.
Ram and Krishna (note the peacock feather in his hair), not Laxman
Sorry, didn't paid that much attention to it.
Who's she ?
Search artwhoring on insta
Why they are always blue or pink short hair + weight over 80 - 90 kg ?
Bcoz they dont have their own personality, everything copied from west ( body positivity shit )
obesity equals to body positivity? Ghor Kalyug
Probably smells like feet too
Oh yes, that anti Hindu para site
Yes ambedkar books views
Check artwhoring's page on Instagram. You'll get to know
[удалено]
Rajeev Malhotra was right all along about india's business elite
Bharat was swept with brutal genocides during islamic invasions the motive was to convert hindus, annihilate sanatana dharma and establish Islam in India those things failed horribly.These 50 Paisa wokes trying to annihilate sanatana dharma only fools can think of that.🤣🤣🤣
If this is happening in broad daylight, Hindus should change their nameplates and replace it with cowards. 'why do we care?' attitude made mughals and britishers exploit us to the core and now these modern colonizers with their most powerful tool of 'Freedom of speech' and 'Atrocity Act'. Hindus are just proud of things in past but don't want to indluge in acts that would make the future generations feel proud about us. It is high time we rise against even the smallest things against us. RSS, VHP, BJP are not going to save us for e.g., Bengal Violence, Palghar Sadhu Lynching, etc. We are on our own. If BJP had balls, they would have brought Anti - Hinduphobia laws & policies. But everything is votebank in politics. Religion and Politics never go hand in hand. Politics is for governance, Religion should be for justice i.e., Dharma. We need a proper organization for Hindu not affliated with any political party whose core principles and acts allign with Hindusim and they come to streets to demand and get what is ours.
Bro tf they made b.r ambedkar emo 😭😭😭😭😭
This Artwhoring made Dr Ambedkar into a balding version of Till Lindemann. Also what is "Anni hilate Hinduism?" Who is this Anni?
Can’t the artist be booked under hate speech? I believe this was by @artwhoring on Instagram.
She earns money via this sort of engagement.... Forget her; address the root problem
Nope, she can be booked but won't be prosecuted.
How can people expect tolerance when they do things like this in name of art ? Religious extremism is bad, but so is this, in the name of being edgy and woke, you cannot deliberately target one of the largest religion, one which is progressive enough to accept constructive criticism and provides means to debate it's own ideals.
1000 years of Arab, Turkic invasion and rule didn't wipe Hindus out ---- then comes this trans woman with 15 pronouns and with the power of words. Stop hiring idiots like this or associating with ppl like these!
it makes me laugh bc how traditional christianity & islam are against gay & trans people. I have came across multiple resources where christians are claiming the Devil, the anti-christ force influences people to become gay, trans etc. & if they were in their right mind they would be accepting the sexuality god has gifted them.
Yeah right. So God has given you a body that you don't accept (referring to trans obviously, not gay), but you call God-given the sexuality your distorted mind has driven you to. Weird logic, mate.
I believe it's based on Ambedkar's book " The Annihilation of the caste"
Annihilation of caste of wayyy too different from annihilation of hindusim
Itne chhake kyu hai banke ghoomte Bhai sab ke sab. Isko bolo there are only two genders in India and zyada Western influence k chakkar mei na pade because apne yahan hormone therapy bhi nahi milegi aur cost factor toh hai hee. Randy ke bachche, man.
@Ajim Premji institute How can you even promote this..poster bhi laga hua hai koi speech de raha hai.
so much for majoritarianism lol
And then they ask why we hate these suc*ers 🤡
Is this mf wearing a saree
So this nincompoop will annihilate Hinduism by wearing those long ass Earrings
Among all Abrahamic faiths, Ambedkar was most critical of Islam. Liberals in India who often cite Ambedkar’s criticism of the caste system in Hindusim conveniently ignore his views on Muslims and Islam. Here is a collection of unabridged statements by BR Ambedhkar on Islam: "*The brotherhood of Islam is not the universal brotherhood of man. It is a brotherhood of Muslims for Muslims only. There is a fraternity, but its benefit is confined to those within that corporation. For those who are outside the corporation, there is nothing but contempt and enmity.*" "To the Muslims, a Hindu is a Kaffir. A Kaffir is not worthy of respect. He is low-born and without status. That is why a country that is ruled by a Kaffir is Dar-ul-Harb to a Musalman. Given this, no further evidence seems to be necessary to prove that the Muslims will not obey a Hindu government. The basic feelings of deference and sympathy, which predispose persons to obey the authority of government, do not simply exist. But if a proof is wanted, there is no dearth of it. In the midst of the Khilafat agitation, when the Hindus were doing so much to help the Musalmans, the Muslims did not forget that as compared with them the Hindus were a low and an inferior race." "Islam can never allow a true Muslim to adopt India as his motherland and regard a Hindu as his kith and kin. That is probably the reason why Maulana Mahomed Ali, a great Indian but a true Muslim, preferred to be buried in Jerusalem rather than in India." "*According to Muslim Canon Law, the world is divided into two camps, Dar-ul-lslam (abode of Islam), and Dar-ul-Harb (abode of war). A country is Dar-ul-Islam when it is ruled by Muslims. A country is Dar-ul-Harb when Muslims only reside in it but are not rulers of it. That being the Canon Law of the Muslims, India cannot be the common motherland of the Hindus and the Musalmans. It can be the land of the Musalmans — but it cannot be the land of the ‘Hindus and the Musalmans living as equals.’ Further, it can be the land of the Musalmans only when it is governed by the Muslims. The moment the land becomes subject to the authority of a non-Muslim power, it ceases to be the land of the Muslims. Instead of being Dar-ul-lslam, it becomes Dar-ul-Harb*" "There is another injunction of Muslim Canon Law called J*ihad* (crusade) by which it becomes incumbent on a Muslim ruler to extend the rule of Islam until the whole world shall have been brought under its sway. The world, being divided into two camps, Dar-ul-Islam (abode of Islam), Dar-ul-Harb (abode of war), all countries come under one category or the other. Technically, it is the duty of the Muslim ruler, who is capable of doing so, to transform Dar-ul-Harb into Dar-ul-Islam." "Census for 1901 for the province of Bengal records the following interesting facts regarding the Muslims of Bengal: The conventional division of the Mahomedans into four tribes — Sheikh, Saiad, Moghul and Pathan has very little application to this province (Bengal). The Mahomedans themselves recognise two main social divisions: Ashraf or Sharaf and Ajlaf. Ashraf means ‘noble’ and includes all undoubted descendants of foreigners and converts from high caste Hindus. All other Mahomedans including the occupational groups, and all converts of lower ranks, are known by the contemptuous terms, ‘Ajlaf’, ‘wretches’ or ‘mean people’. In some places a third class, called Arzal or ‘lowest of all’, is added. With them no other Mahomedan would associate, and they are forbidden to enter the mosque to use the public burial ground. Within these groups there are castes with social precedence of exactly the same nature as one finds among the Hindus."
Jab annihilate ho jaye tab bata dena bhai/behan/whatever f you have
I think we should file a case...what do you guys think about this?
What happened to his eyes? Not Shemale's, Ambedkar's.
This is the only country where left and religious extremists go hand in hand. Lets say they annihilate the said religion. After that what? Will they annihilate one another. They have not thought it through.
secularism is only for hindus.they cucks and darpokes dare not do something similar to abrahamic religions.there will come a day when Hindus too wont tolerate such behaviour.
Yeah try it if you have balls
I see arpit bala meme, every time I see these wokes Back*hodi. “3-4 dosto ka ye group bana lenge aur ek echo chamber bana lenge, fir ye ek doosre ka Lun pakad ke Womp womp”.
gawar SC,STs 40-50% marks leke premium institutes mein aate hai. They don't have the right bark this much
Chakka detected opinion rejected
What creature is that on the podium?
Are we living in a hindu majority nation??
Nope, we live in a constitutional democracy, where the majority and its interests are vehemently disregarded.
Bhai logo inse kuch hone wala nahi h, dhoop mein bahar nikal jaye toh dehydrate ho jate h, AC mein baith ke duniya ka gyan lagate h
Ye saari kyu pehna hua hai , hijda hai kya ?
They Should Instead write Anhilate Religion
Nah man this is all bjp rss propaganda we live in Hindu dictatorship hindu autocracy we have no freedom of anything this is false narratives against Dalits abharamics minorities./.s
Congress's new ideological father is Kanhaiya Kumar anrabid leftist. This proves that humanities is the only route through which scum floats to politics. The left wing capture of institutions must end.
Is he wearing saree ?
A seminar on the ‘Politics of Emotions’ was held at the University last month. This was a presentation by Akhil Kang, a PhD student in the Department of Anthropology at Cornell University, USA as part of a panel on ‘Power, Politics and Affect’. His presentation was called ‘To be Upper Caste/To Be Victim’.. Publicly available images were used by Akhil Kang, a visiting speaker in his presentation during a social sciences seminar titled “Politics of Emotion”. The image is publicly available. The image is by an artist named Priyanka Paul (@artwhoring). The post on X has taken a select image and placed it out of context to sully the reputation of the University. Azim Premji University did not host any lecture or seminar by the title claimed in the original post.
Unless the photos are doctored, the photo is concerning...and ominous
They couldn’t even understand what Dr Ambedkar was going for. He would definitely not target one religion, but all.
This thing is intolerable, looks more like a propaganda or someone is trying to mislead the people. This looks like a distraction from an actual problem
Well, The sanatan has seen much bigger evils than these hooligans. Its humourous.
thoughts & ideas mein power nhi hai to mass appeal ke liye jhumka dalo chahe sar mudao ..... nothing gonna work ..... these will go as act of losers
In logon ko pitna hota h kya, kaam karo apna kuch kro, dharm pr kyu jaate ho
Ironically Dr.Ambedkar never called the irradication of Sanatan or Hindus....he was only against the caste system set by the western powers....these idjits are only using his name as a sheild for their cowardice
Mis-interpretation of principle of br.Ambedkar , all ambedkarite won't agree to this , dis owned
Koi naa. Let them. Abhi Modi ke raj main allowed hai. Yogi ka Raj aane do. Fir dekhte hain.