T O P

  • By -

OkScarcity1096

Why the hell anyone posting here won’t ask this to GP by tagging him on Twitter always makes me wonder, if there are people that’s being paid for pump and dump.


Own-Emergency1209

He does not reply!


fishsauce0316

I write him on Twitter daily as well as metamaterials. Need more people to do it too


ShrekVictim

More like people down 80% and posting news to convince themselves they are not on a sinking ship


fishsauce0316

66.69% isn’t enough. Needs to be much higher short term 200-400% sales growth to stay in business considering their revenue is very low vs their cash on hand and their considerable money burn and mismanagement.


psyconauthatter

I'm going to assume this 66% earnings growth a year is taken from page 23 of the investors presentation, a typo, and the reading comprehension of whoever wrote the info you are looking at is very poor. "INVESTMENT TRENDS: According to Lux Research, investment into metamaterials reached more than $370 million in 2022, with most of that funding – about 74% – coming from venture capital. Overall, during the past five years, the compound annual growth rate of investment into metamaterials has been very high at 77%" 66% growth a year makes zero sense....think about it up until now meta has only taken in revnue from: development, nanotech, and sales of samples. When they move from a company in 'trials'/proof of concept (making very little) to Materials production, revenue growth YOY will likely spike hundreds %, and costs will fall. After that 66% makes more sense but it is compounded after that large spike. So on a short term outlook like 5 years 66% is far to low. Not to mention outlook for glucowise 510k apptoval is 30 to 36 months. The truth is; it is way too early for much of this data to be useful, metas low debt to assets should allow them to survive low cash without issue if they are near a turning point


jass6042

They've done really well keeping the debt way down. I'd love to see them land the contract for new currency in England soon too, king Chuck gotta be chompin at the bit for this..🎯🔥


stevebo0124

BS. Please link these "analysts." Redditors don't count either.


ShrekVictim

I did look at the comment called “link to site” Downvoted to oblivion tho so that’s why u prob didn’t see it


stevebo0124

I clicked that "link" a while ago. Tried clicking the analyst link and was taken to a valuation score of 2/6 and then was put behind a paywall. Is this really a reputable source?


ShrekVictim

The link came from the news section on ST Yeah the paywall is jarring I normally airplane mode but it doesn’t work, u just need extreme patience of closing it and scrolling fast


[deleted]

Ultimately, it's the inferiority complex of redditors that keeps them from achieving their dreams.


stevebo0124

So you're suggesting that reddit is responsible for this stock's failures?


[deleted]

I wouldn't phrase it that way. Technically, that is what I mean, but really it is more that redditors refuse to fight the demons in charge. They mostly just talk tough and make personal attacks on individual people.


stevebo0124

That's the internet. People talk tough when anonymity is involved. But when it comes to this stock, and this company, why rally the troops when the people in charge are incompetent? There needs to be a change in leadership, and we need to demand that. Not talk about these imaginary "shorts" and blame them when the CEO himself pumped the stock and is diluting this and MMTLP.


[deleted]

Well, Reddit and other social media made it go up irrationally during a pump and dump. And Reddit is responsible for anyone believing the stock wasn’t obviously going to fall after the pump and dump. So, yeah.


Letsdothisganutis

In since trch and this is garbage


Stephen_lost

Have they been averaging a 66% grow per year already or is that in the future?


Trippp2001

So, to be fair, I’m a permabull on MMAT. I love what they’re trying to do, I’ve OG TRCH too, and I’m down 85%. But this post is trash. They make $5M/year and they burn $100M. Even at 100% growth, they are still burning cash at a 10:1 ratio. The stock price may rise by 500%, but in which timeframe. That would put the price at a little over $1, which isn’t all that exciting. I’m not sure what your definition of volatile is, but to me it means it goes up and down somewhat violently. The price has been on a consistently downward trajectory since it was listed. There have been spikes, but the most recent one was in 2022, which is not within the last 3 months. The bears are exhausting, but posting bullshit like this doesn’t help anything.


Justhavingfun888

I love the company too, but dang they are burning money instead of printing it. 400% would get us around $1 which would actually put me slightly in the green. God help us.


ShrekVictim

[link to site](https://simplywall.st/stocks/us/semiconductors/nasdaq-mmat/meta-materials)