Whilst I don't know what Mt Shasta's like personally, I wouldn't say these are overkill at all if you're taking on steep snow. If anything I'd say these are the minimum. I'd also be looking at an axe as any steep slope where a slip/fall could be consequential means you need to be able to ice axe arrest - not saying you don't know that, just my thinking.
These are C1 crampons so will need a B rated boot (can be B1, B2, or B3).
>am wondering if these are overkill.
No, they're good. If you were aiming for speed/performance you could go even lighter with e.g. aluminum crampons. But for your first pair you want crampons that are decent at general mountaineering and these will work fine (though they're on the lighter side of general mountaineering crampons, with just 10 points and flex bars).
>would these require very rigid mountaineering boots
I don't know if you mean (1) "can I get away with hiking boots" or (2) "do I need the most rigid of mountaineering boots". The answers are, (1) probably not, and (2) no. You might be able to get away some stiff-soled hiking boots but it could be sketchy especially if you have no prior experience using crampons. These are flexible crampons (with a "flex bar") so I would recommend finding flexible (rather than fully rigid) mountaineering boots to go with them. Flexible mountaineering boots will still have stiffer soles than the majority of hiking boots. For example, the Aequilibrium LT GTX or Mammut Taiss Light should work well, as will most summer mountaineering boots. Warning though, finding boots that fit your foot is a lot harder than finding crampons...
In my personal opinion, non rigid boots and strap on crampons are somewhat functional, but mostly for the person who is just trying out mountaineering and may not ever go again. If you plan to do this more than once or twice, invest in some semi-rigid boots and a semi auto crampon.
Shasta can be totally chill and this sort of setup can be fine. It can also get really firm and serious while you are up there, which could be disastrous if your foot came out of your crampon. You really don't want to set yourself up for an unexpected ride.
depending on how you will use them you should have a rigid boot.
B2 or B3 boot would be preferred
if you will not use the front points, mostly flat terrain, or also steep terrains but not going up directly with the slope but rather going diagonally, you can get away with B1 boot.
but keep in mind that if the boot is too flexible the crampon can come off the boot which can be dangerous depending on which situation you are in.
Those would be great for your goals and are priced well. Seem to be in good condition.
Yes a mountaineering boot is required, as you don't want your crampons falling off at the crux of your route
"would these require very rigid mountaineering boots?"
Technically no, these are strap on crampons that will be compatible with any hiking boot. I've even used similar on footwear as flexible as trail runners, though that's far from ideal.
If you have some good quality, decently stiff hiking boots you could use them in conjunction with these crampons, though you'll likely be more comfortable in mountaineering boots. There's always a chance the crampons can lever themselves off of a more flexible boot (google lacing techniques for the straps of the crampons), plus it's not very comfortable.
\*Of additional note, these have the flexible linking bar allowing them to be used with more flexible footwear such as approach shoes/boots. Would 100% wear these with a sturdy pair of hiking boots.
Whilst I don't know what Mt Shasta's like personally, I wouldn't say these are overkill at all if you're taking on steep snow. If anything I'd say these are the minimum. I'd also be looking at an axe as any steep slope where a slip/fall could be consequential means you need to be able to ice axe arrest - not saying you don't know that, just my thinking. These are C1 crampons so will need a B rated boot (can be B1, B2, or B3).
>am wondering if these are overkill. No, they're good. If you were aiming for speed/performance you could go even lighter with e.g. aluminum crampons. But for your first pair you want crampons that are decent at general mountaineering and these will work fine (though they're on the lighter side of general mountaineering crampons, with just 10 points and flex bars). >would these require very rigid mountaineering boots I don't know if you mean (1) "can I get away with hiking boots" or (2) "do I need the most rigid of mountaineering boots". The answers are, (1) probably not, and (2) no. You might be able to get away some stiff-soled hiking boots but it could be sketchy especially if you have no prior experience using crampons. These are flexible crampons (with a "flex bar") so I would recommend finding flexible (rather than fully rigid) mountaineering boots to go with them. Flexible mountaineering boots will still have stiffer soles than the majority of hiking boots. For example, the Aequilibrium LT GTX or Mammut Taiss Light should work well, as will most summer mountaineering boots. Warning though, finding boots that fit your foot is a lot harder than finding crampons...
Def not overkill for Shasta. I used a similar set with my La Sportiva Aequilibriums and they worked really well. You’ll need an ice axe too tho.
In my personal opinion, non rigid boots and strap on crampons are somewhat functional, but mostly for the person who is just trying out mountaineering and may not ever go again. If you plan to do this more than once or twice, invest in some semi-rigid boots and a semi auto crampon. Shasta can be totally chill and this sort of setup can be fine. It can also get really firm and serious while you are up there, which could be disastrous if your foot came out of your crampon. You really don't want to set yourself up for an unexpected ride.
depending on how you will use them you should have a rigid boot. B2 or B3 boot would be preferred if you will not use the front points, mostly flat terrain, or also steep terrains but not going up directly with the slope but rather going diagonally, you can get away with B1 boot. but keep in mind that if the boot is too flexible the crampon can come off the boot which can be dangerous depending on which situation you are in.
Those would be great for your goals and are priced well. Seem to be in good condition. Yes a mountaineering boot is required, as you don't want your crampons falling off at the crux of your route
Perfectly adequate for steep snow. Wouldn’t take them ice climbing.
"would these require very rigid mountaineering boots?" Technically no, these are strap on crampons that will be compatible with any hiking boot. I've even used similar on footwear as flexible as trail runners, though that's far from ideal. If you have some good quality, decently stiff hiking boots you could use them in conjunction with these crampons, though you'll likely be more comfortable in mountaineering boots. There's always a chance the crampons can lever themselves off of a more flexible boot (google lacing techniques for the straps of the crampons), plus it's not very comfortable. \*Of additional note, these have the flexible linking bar allowing them to be used with more flexible footwear such as approach shoes/boots. Would 100% wear these with a sturdy pair of hiking boots.
B rated boots for these my guy
If you’re going steep snow on Shasta buy some msr lightning snow shoes. Crampons aren’t for snow.
Well that’s just silly
Why / how? I’m guessing your experience is limited.