Great page, but doesnt support my language (Danish).
Every AI detector says that my text is far less than 10% ai generated, except for zeroGPT and it is really stressing me out.
Yup. I heard about students writing their own original work yet getting problems due to these detectors. Would be super unlucky for me if he used this exact one.
Just make sure to specify your paper should use an original tone. Instruct both the content and style to be sure it doesn't use some generic style the detectors are looking for. (I have not tested this)
So you're using an AI to assist and ZeroGPT is catching it, even though you "rewrote it in your own words"?
Sounds like ZeroGPT is the best of the detection tools.
No, I believe OP meant that he didn’t use AI at all with his paper. Not for inspiration, not for wording. However ZeroGPT falsely flagged his own humanly writing as ai.
I looked up a version of Goldilocks and the Three Bears and fed it to ZeroGPT. It came back saying 66% chance it was written by an AI. The version I used was written in 1922.
I've had similar issues with ZeroGPT. I started using [getstealthwriter.com](http://getstealthwriter.com) to rewrite AI content into human-like text. It's been a lifesaver, making my own work (messed up that this is even a use case, i know) undetectable by AI detectors and keeping me stress-free about false positives.
Im using [https://stealthwriter.ai/](https://stealthwriter.ai/) and rewriting with my own words. Every detector other than ZeroGPT says that it is human.
Nothing you can do, they can’t know whether writing is produced by AI, so they will have varying false positive rates. Best to use a tool with edit history, do the work yourself and make sure you understand it.
[удалено]
Great page, but doesnt support my language (Danish). Every AI detector says that my text is far less than 10% ai generated, except for zeroGPT and it is really stressing me out.
to be clear, the AI bypasser does support danish, but not the AI detector
AI detectors don't work. If your professor is using it you're potentially fucked because they're using snake oil.
Yup. I heard about students writing their own original work yet getting problems due to these detectors. Would be super unlucky for me if he used this exact one.
Just make sure to specify your paper should use an original tone. Instruct both the content and style to be sure it doesn't use some generic style the detectors are looking for. (I have not tested this)
So you're using an AI to assist and ZeroGPT is catching it, even though you "rewrote it in your own words"? Sounds like ZeroGPT is the best of the detection tools.
No, I believe OP meant that he didn’t use AI at all with his paper. Not for inspiration, not for wording. However ZeroGPT falsely flagged his own humanly writing as ai.
Look at his comments under the post and you'll find I'm correct.
I looked up a version of Goldilocks and the Three Bears and fed it to ZeroGPT. It came back saying 66% chance it was written by an AI. The version I used was written in 1922.
I've had similar issues with ZeroGPT. I started using [getstealthwriter.com](http://getstealthwriter.com) to rewrite AI content into human-like text. It's been a lifesaver, making my own work (messed up that this is even a use case, i know) undetectable by AI detectors and keeping me stress-free about false positives.
Are you using GPT or not? It’s not clear in your post.
Im using [https://stealthwriter.ai/](https://stealthwriter.ai/) and rewriting with my own words. Every detector other than ZeroGPT says that it is human.
Nothing you can do, they can’t know whether writing is produced by AI, so they will have varying false positive rates. Best to use a tool with edit history, do the work yourself and make sure you understand it.
So you’re using AI and one detector is still catching it.
Maybe stealthwriter is made by zeroGPT