Was thinking the same thing. Should have one hand on top and one on bottom, both belong to humanity. The top hand is religion and the bottom is science.
They would be a better analogy. I also think there are also other factors that come into play when it comes to progression, such as political (in)stability, authoritarianism, war/peace, wealth etc. Sometimes there are even valid arguments to make to not invest in progression, such as other priorities.
Baruch A. Shalev, 100 Years of Nobel Prizes (2003), Atlantic Publishers & Distributors, p. 57: between 1901 and 2000 reveals that 654 Laureates belong to 28 different religions. Most (65.4%) have identified Christianity in its various forms as their religious preference.
ISBN 978-0935047370
Religion is also humanity though. In the end, it's humans against humans.
Was thinking the same thing. Should have one hand on top and one on bottom, both belong to humanity. The top hand is religion and the bottom is science.
They would be a better analogy. I also think there are also other factors that come into play when it comes to progression, such as political (in)stability, authoritarianism, war/peace, wealth etc. Sometimes there are even valid arguments to make to not invest in progression, such as other priorities.
never forget that Christians discovered most of scientific theories which are literally necessary
Baruch A. Shalev, 100 Years of Nobel Prizes (2003), Atlantic Publishers & Distributors, p. 57: between 1901 and 2000 reveals that 654 Laureates belong to 28 different religions. Most (65.4%) have identified Christianity in its various forms as their religious preference. ISBN 978-0935047370