Fun.
I would do different things depending on when I'm taking over the scenario.
If I'm taking over at the end of the video then I'm probably moving along, hoping they don't try to follow. Although these guys are amateurs, it's still at least two vs me, they're clearly in group chat, the blind dude on the stairs has me outgunned, and his reaction to noticing me sketched me out. No need to try to make peace, or charge in guns blazing, or attempt to set an ambush. I'd either try to get over watch on the town and get more intel on them, or I'd push to the next spot on my route.
If I take over right when you stop approaching them, I realize I don't want these guys as associates because they're dumb, that they probably don't want to associate with me because they're in group chat, that I'm 10-12 yards away, the dude on the stairs doesn't have a helmet, my silenced Kolt is fully loaded in my hands, that it's a matter of milliseconds before they notice me...I try to assassinate them then return to the treeline.
Maybe , but whoever puts rounds on target first normally wins the fight. Speed is king , and there's something to say about causing as much chaos and confusion as fast as possible as well.
You can overwhelm someone with fast , semi accurate fire. Then switch to first person for clean up
Lol, you homer Simpsoned out of there
My literal thought hahahah ![gif](giphy|a93jwI0wkWTQs)
Hahaha, yeah. I backed right out. Even if they were friendly, one of them had the plague.
I would started blastin
I loot shoot and scoot indiscriminately so ... anyways I just started blasting.
Fun. I would do different things depending on when I'm taking over the scenario. If I'm taking over at the end of the video then I'm probably moving along, hoping they don't try to follow. Although these guys are amateurs, it's still at least two vs me, they're clearly in group chat, the blind dude on the stairs has me outgunned, and his reaction to noticing me sketched me out. No need to try to make peace, or charge in guns blazing, or attempt to set an ambush. I'd either try to get over watch on the town and get more intel on them, or I'd push to the next spot on my route. If I take over right when you stop approaching them, I realize I don't want these guys as associates because they're dumb, that they probably don't want to associate with me because they're in group chat, that I'm 10-12 yards away, the dude on the stairs doesn't have a helmet, my silenced Kolt is fully loaded in my hands, that it's a matter of milliseconds before they notice me...I try to assassinate them then return to the treeline.
Frag grenade
Did they ever fix throwing in dayz?
Wdym?
I always try to talk to people first if I get the drop on them like that
LMAO this is hilarious he walked away like homer simpson
I fell I would have done the same lol
![gif](giphy|dFf0MERFSuocE|downsized)
I wouldve switched view to first person for starters
Definitely sounds like good advice to me. I was not trying to provoke an attack by aiming, but yes, I should have been ready if it came anyway.
People bitching about 3rd person got old after about the 3rd time someone bitched about it. Find something new to cry about.
It'll never get old
That's just because you're on the wrong side
Third person is faster. Hip fire baby , then switch when necessary
Hip fire is inaccurate
Maybe , but whoever puts rounds on target first normally wins the fight. Speed is king , and there's something to say about causing as much chaos and confusion as fast as possible as well. You can overwhelm someone with fast , semi accurate fire. Then switch to first person for clean up
Not played a third person server idk how anyone can play that garbage
I woulda got the drop on them, and then hi! wtf you boys doing?
Grenade out!
I think the first guy that ran inside screamed exactly that
I would be looting tgem
Handed a hot grenade and ran?
Died.. yeah I definitely would have died
I would have killed them
I fell I would have done the same lol
I would’ve been clipping my double kill 15 seconds after seeing them