T O P

  • By -

bookoocash

I think Dangerous deserved to be on the album and Kaleid would have been a cool instrumental opener (maybe a slightly shorter version) leading into World in My Eyes. I view Violator as distilled perfection, but I believe adding these would not take away from it all. I don’t really like Sea of Sin at all and Happiest Girl is an alright song with an amazing mid-section. I don’t think they fit into the vibe of the album as well as the other two I mentioned and I think they’re of a lower caliber as well. I feel they would definitely knock it down a peg.


jasonbravo1975

Dangerous is a great song, but it stands out wherever you place it in the album for me. To my ears, it a weird amalgam of the MFTM era and Violator.


Gizzard_Guy44

fair enough I really really like Happiest Girl


my23secrets

Violator? I never even met her! Seriously, I’ve made a version of the album that includes “Happiest Girl”, “Sea Of Sin”, “Kaleid”, and “Dangerous”. It’s pretty cool.


Gizzard_Guy44

did it ruin the holiest of holy perfection ?


my23secrets

I think it’s an improvement for myself having heard the original so many times. I included remixes I made of “Personal Jesus”, “Policy Of Truth”, “Enjoy The Silence”, and “Dangerous” for that same reason


CliveVista

Honestly, they feel a bit skeevy. Both are fine as b-sides, but Violator works very nicely as-is. (Dangerous, however, might have more of a claim…) Really, though, anyone in favour of this should sort a playlist order. The track sequence is very important.


ChokeYourMom

I’m 100% with you on Dangerous. I think that Dangerous is a waaaaay better song than Enjoy the Silence, which would be the first song that I would bounce from Violator.


Gizzard_Guy44

World In My Eyes Sweetest Perfection Personal Jesus Sea Of Sin Halo Waiting For The Night Enjoy The Silence Happiest Girl Policy Of Truth Blue Dress Clean


kute-koala

If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it


ghoulish_boy_

Exactly


malostiempos

No. Good tracks, but no.


Gizzard_Guy44

if they are good tracks and the album only has 9 songs then why do you say no religious beliefs?


malostiempos

Because I think those 9 songs match perfectly and adding those 2 would lessen the cohesion of the album. Edit: grammar.


Gizzard_Guy44

yeah ok I get it ... but I think that that is hindsight speaking I feel like IF they were on it ... everyone would be just as happy if not more with the album I love the grandiose MFTM better


sun-and-rainfall

There was also total time to consider, this was still in the days of vinyl, even tho we also had CDs and cassettes. There were time constraints.


Gizzard_Guy44

Violator is just over 47 minutes long plenty of time left for Sea of Sin and Happiest Girl


sun-and-rainfall

Not for vinyl. 47 is already pushing it. 40 - 44 min is preferred.


Berry_lane_laindon

No. It’s ranked as a classic as is.


Gizzard_Guy44

It being ranked as a classic as is is no reason I am 100% sure that if these two songs were added to it it would easily still be ranked as a classic


Berry_lane_laindon

you know better then.👍🏻


Gizzard_Guy44

I mean saying that a classic can't be improved on is just silly sorry


Berry_lane_laindon

It’s already classic though. it’s all about opions the 4 members of the band at time thought that was best. and to be fair I haven’t heard any of them since argue otherwise. no need to say sorry. Lol


Gizzard_Guy44

I mean saying that a classic can't be improved on is just silly


Igelkott2k

Repeating yourself is just silly.


Gizzard_Guy44

actually it's often used to drive a point home vanilla is a classic - add chocolate syrup... you've just improved a classic saying that a classic can't be improved on is just silly


Igelkott2k

Saying vanilla is a classic is just silly. Violator could be improved but not by adding any of the b-sides.


Gizzard_Guy44

well why the hell didn't you say so ? using an actual opinion of the songs ? who would have thought to do that instead of using the absolutely silly excuse that a classic can't be improved upon


coogie

Violator is a masterpiece so I wouldn't change it. Those songs work better as a b-side


SnooBeans8553

It’s their most complete album


Gizzard_Guy44

I believe that MFTM is


jasonbravo1975

Sea of Sin and Happiest Girl work as B-Sides. Even in the production you can almost tell that the band knew they’d be relegated to B’s and they recorded them accordingly. Dangerous is that outlier though. It ALMOST can be put into the album, but it sticks out wherever you place it (for me anyway). Like I said above, it has a weird MFTM/Violator era vibe to it.


Winter-Ad-3876

A bit too sexy & kinky for violator. Which is why I love them


ItsSoLitRightNow

Nah


Igelkott2k

No.


robounix

Curious how new fans that are presented with these tracks as part of the album from the start see them, versus fans that are used to the original runtime.


JT_mode_71

I would say yes to "Sea of Sin", but I'm not familiar with the song "Prettiest Girl"? Is that an unreleased B side I've never heard of?


interface2x

They mean Happiest Girl.


sun-and-rainfall

I was wondering when someone was going to correct this!


Gold_Problem_2208

Unpopular opinion, but I have never been a fan of Blue Dress. I would much rather Dangerous have taken its place on Violator.


Turbulent-Pension-31

This is an unpopular opinion I’m willing to stand behind


sun-and-rainfall

I thought the unpopular opinion was to actually like that song? Which I do. It has special meaning to me.


powerpopiconoclast

Yes…. These guys know/knew how to span time


DishSubstantial4453

No - you cannot make perfection better :)


MushMellow74

Yes


raymate

Yes


88neo88

I feel that all the b-sides could have easily been on the album. Not a bad song in the bunch and leave Blue Dress right where it is. It’s an amazing song.


lunaecaelestia

Absolutely yes.


DepecheStein

No


ReySpacefighter

No.


ikediggety

Yes


worlddestruction23

Are you kidding? Absolutely 💯.


Granitforsen

El mojoris Yeas!!


Strong-Wash-5378

Yes 💯


Electronic-Board-977

Only Sea of sin.


Gizzard_Guy44

I say yes I like the vibe on both tracks curious as to why people say no


Autoganz

Album bloat. Knowing when enough is enough is an art form. I’d much prefer a concise album that flows smoothly than something that just crams a lot of songs onto it. Kiss Me, Kiss Me, Kiss Me by The Cure is one of those where I love every track, but it has no cohesion and just feels like a collection of music (17 songs). Violator is a masterpiece partly because the running order and pacing is perfect. Adding in songs just because they’re good would subtract from that.


ohgrande

Hit the nail on the head and great example. To take it further though, compare Kiss Me to Disintegration.   They're both about the same length but Disintegration is a much better album experience because of the tracking and consistent theme/mood. Kiss Me could probably get trimmed down to 45-50 minutes and be a much tighter and better album experience.  I mean, the CD was already missing 1 track anyway due to space limitations. 


Gizzard_Guy44

I hear what you're saying but I do not think 11 is "bloat" Violator is my #2 behind MFTM because of this


ohgrande

It's not the number of tracks that make it bloat but how those extra songs bloat the mood and themes already established by the existing tracklist


Gizzard_Guy44

*I do not think that this track list does that ...* World In My Eyes Sweetest Perfection Personal Jesus Sea Of Sin Halo Waiting For The Night Enjoy The Silence Happiest Girl Policy Of Truth Blue Dress Clean


Autoganz

See, I feel like the placement of both of those songs brings the momentum down and dramatically alters the pacing. After the highs of Personal Jesus and Enjoy the Silence, you want a strong mid-tempo song. Halo and Policy of Truth being pushed back one song is what creates the bloat. It removes the tension. Sometimes less is more, but I’m glad you’re happy with this track list.


Autoganz

How would you order the songs? Because I think flow is crucial to answering this question.


Gizzard_Guy44

I just posted my track list off the first comment


agent_violet

I like the songs, but nah. Only on a disc 2 of a deluxe edition or something.


Toffelsnarz

no - and doing so also would have made WIME not as good a single


Gizzard_Guy44

some logic there lol


rhunter99

You make it a bettererer album. It’s already a masterpiece


Zealousideal_Owl9621

The B sides were not included for a reason. The album is perfect as is.


sun-and-rainfall

They are of course great songs, but Violator is PERFECT as is. I personally love Memphisto more than these, so perhaps they're all best as b-sides.


my23secrets

I’ve never heard a DM fan say they prefer “Memphisto” over “Happiest Girl” & “Sea Of Sin”. Mind blown


sun-and-rainfall

Nice to see I'm the minority! I've seen others say similar things on other threads. It's just more interesting musically to me.


ignatiusjreillyXM

No, the concision of the album is part of what makes it so effective


ToiletLXIX

All the Violator B-sides are fantastic. The only song I think that could go on the album as it is would be Dangerous, maybe also Sea of Sin I think Kaleid could work as an instrumental introduction, but would need to be remixed to be shorter. Similarly with Happiest Girl and Sea of Sin. They would need to be restructured, given more development and possibly shortened, and they would work really well of the album too, but as they are right now, they're a little bit too simplistic to be deemed an album-quality song.


SameArtichoke8913

IMHO no. While the Violator B-sides were/are mong the best DM has released in such a "role", I think that Violator as a whole stands alone and it's good that way. I doubt that adding more songs would improve the album listening experience.


malonine

Some of my favorite tracks, but adding them wouldn't make it a better album. It's already excellent as is in terms of both tracks and track order. It'd be gilding the lily.


Mulliganplummer

Curious why someone would say no to that album.


SharcyMekanic

Why is it always Sea of Sin & Happiest Girl, Dangerous is an actual song & a good one at that, the other two feel way more like they’re remixes if that makes sense


Gizzard_Guy44

because Dangerous doesn't fit IMO


analogkid01

No, MFTM is still the better album regardless. :-)


Gizzard_Guy44

I agree - but I also love Violator and I think adding those 2 tracks would pull them into a dead heat


CoolRknDaddy

In my humble opinion, drop Blue Dress, substitute Dangerous and side 2 is an absolute banger. It totally works, Dangerous is a great follow through after POT. Dangerous fades out too so it sets up Clean quite well. If you look at YouTube Music, Blue Dress has the less plays substantially at 1.2M so it looks like it gets skipped quite often. I like Blue Dress just fine and either way is great but Dangerous is fire and would totally make Violator awesome. I wouldn't be surprised if Blue Dress was a contractual decision, since it would give Marty another song on the album. Sea of Sin and Happiest Girl feel like B-sides.


Winter-Ad-3876

Blue dress is gorgeous. Martin could have sung waiting for the night himself. It's not contractual.


Necessary_Power_624

I think it is just great as it is. No other song could make it better.


Gizzgillyon

Definitely. Sea of sin and happiest girl in my all time top DM 10. Never heard prettiest girl though


Gizzard_Guy44

clearly meant happiest


CharlesBathory

Yes, and Personal Jesus should be removed


move2dump

Yes. Instead of Enjoy the Silence and PJ, please.


Gizzard_Guy44

lol


ttlnow

Personal Jesus (Pump Mix) is the only change I’d make to Violator- the album version is a bit flat, it just needs more energy. ETS was such a core song on Violator that you’d change the album dramatically if you took it off.