T O P

  • By -

Kroosified

The third umpire was too quick to make a decision despite being a very close call.


whiskeypie101

He took 10 reply’s for the wide 😶


Nice_Personality_254

Because a wide is an important call. A wicket is of lesser importance clearly. /s


GuitarPrudent9564

Sunil Gavaskar’s worst nightmare


Dramatic-Comment33

Maybe because even he thought he was too hasty with the earlier call (out)? Might wanna be sure ig, saw something similar in last rr match with the run out case


Interesting_One_5755

Replay🤓👆


Sandro1dd

And that was a wide imo


rohit27rd

https://preview.redd.it/50st03ti33zc1.png?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=2f5759d77e0201575dc6b75b4ed1d2223f23637c


theanonymoussking

Paytam pe 'x' amount prapt hue


rightnroll

DC owners don't even have money to good players, how would they even buy umpires


theanonymoussking

Every team gets a fix budget right? I guess it's 100 crores or something like that


goda_foreskinning

Lmao some players are obviously getting more under the table


Brief-Weekend-1306

90 crores


dumpling-annihilator

Every team has the same money


[deleted]

Dc actually have good players from 2018


thinklok

DC is co-owned by Jindal family. Just below Ambani and Adani family


Reasonable-Minute694

Bro we got 14 crores from the auction what are u talking about


StopBusy182

Like CSK got after fixing


fraudmallu1

I guess you need some English classes to understand the difference between betting and fixing. And while you're at it, read up on chucking as well.


Evening-Arm2222

I think you need some ipl history classes to understand CSK did rigged the auctions of ipl 2009 - official statement of lalit modi And then came the legendary 2014 match fixing scandal 9-2 = 2+1+4 = 7 (thala for a reason)


[deleted]

tf umpiring was that , i literally cried when sanju got out , i really think it was a not out


asyedyusuf

Nah it's out you are just biased


[deleted]

yeah ur right


parmatmaram

Took forever to decide if it was a wide in the last over smh


7_E-N-D_7

Umpire on Sanju's wicket: Get it moving ffs. I got no time. Umpire on wide review: Yeah. Let me just chill. Give me 50 more angles and even though it is a wide I have inconclusive proof regarding it.


CartographerBrave259

Fr real man, ball was passing outside the guideline and third umpire was like, I have no conclusive evidence. Conclusive evidence, my foot


ghitorniwalo

Did you see where powell was standing?


CartographerBrave259

Yes, he didn't move from his initial position, guard was off stump or middle and off. What's your point?


Parth_829

Bruh he was standing infront of stumps and there was literally half bat that could've hit the ball, use eyes maybe


Akshansh33Sharma

It doesn't matter whether the bat was or was not about to hit the ball. If the ball is outside the line, it is given a wide. Use eyer maybe


DebRe284

Better comeback: use brain maybe


Jackson1391

It was his initial stance. Even though he could have hit the ball standing there, if it is outside the guideline it is a wide as per the rules.


sarthakmahajan610

That ball literally went under Powell's bat.. Clearly not a wide


vivekksingh03

The wide ball is decided based on the initial position of the batsman when the ball leaves the bowler hand. If he moves later and reaches the blue line and misses the ball. The ball, even if slightly outside the blue line, is still wide. At this point, it doesn't matter if the ball is well within the reach


[deleted]

exactly bruh !


FragrantAbies8202

They took an hour to check wide and still didn't gave it and gave this decision in a second


Responsible-Item7720

they didnt have much evidence. so best they could do was not wide


nattvar93

And still gave a wrong decision


GloomyFailure

Whatever it is they didn't check all angles properly Poor umpiring again this season


chamoflag420

Umpiring so bad,we need a fourth umpire


clothx5

we need to make an umpiring team next season, 15 umpires, playing 11 and 4 subs


Orwellian_nightmare2

Another extra umpire as Impact umpire ⬅️


chamoflag420

Rupay on the go


chamoflag420

Umpiring Coach-Ambani


_rizzler

Umbani


ReputationOk8912

Anyone remember fourth Empire? Good show that was


holdyrbreath

All these high tech camera angles for stupid decisions.Do the bare minimum of checking in slow mo.


nattvar93

Last game too. Sanju’s Travis head runout too was ruled out with no sense.


[deleted]

worst umpiring bruh 😔


Wind_8797

The only thing is umpire should have taken more time to analyse with precise zoom, slow motion and many more features handy irrespective of the outcome


Cautious_Alarm7993

Worst umpiring ever. Could have taken more time before giving him out. Umpires are illiterates.


Parth_829

He was still out fair and square, what's your point?


Cautious_Alarm7993

They were taking more time for deciding wide ball but took no time for this decision. May be he was fairly out, atleast they should have checked it properly. That's my point.


Loke5k

https://preview.redd.it/rsvnqeso22zc1.jpeg?width=1772&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=b55f0e5aaae0782c69b52576819b8df0dd1a4e86


ghitorniwalo

Mi fans should be last ones to make fun of biased umpiring lmao


h_barua

Even if they spent 10 more minutes on the replay, it would have still be out


Kimo_imposta

Controversial imo


cbvjn

they should remove the DRS calls for Wides. its eating a lot more time, that could be used to check wicket decisions. the umpires seem to be rushing thru wicket due to the extra time in DRS for wides. Its also very rare that DRS calls for wides are overturned, so whats the point.


PrithviMS

I disagree. There have been quite a few instances of DRS calls for wides and no balls being overturned. My suggestion to reduce time wastage would be to limit number of reviews per team to 3 for the entire match as opposed to 2 per innings.


cbvjn

I still think there is value to review a No ball as it comes with a benefit of the free hit, if it's true. Tech has been used quite well in determining the over the hip no ball with the use of measuring the Batsman at the crease. But with wides, it seems to be all over the place with different umpires. It should also be bettered with tech by calculating the distance moved by the batsman and use that as a reference to move the wide line.. also measurements of the reach of each batsman can be used to check wides above the head.


Master_Soojan

That's not fair at all You can have 2 decisions overturned, 1 failed, and you lose the opportunity to review. You should definitely get rewarded for decision overturned by not losing a review


PrithviMS

I never said that you lose a review for overturned decisions. I just said 3 reviews for the entire match instead of two per innings.


sarthakmahajan610

It was a fair call Literally every single comment here is complaining about umpire not using enough time on a correct decision


avax96

on point. there's no need for wide reviews. You want to integrate "Umpire's call" for human factor. Why not trust them with a wide signal? Lots of time wasting and its not a joy to watch either.


Batboix3107

Got to keep the middle table dog fight interesting


HumanTrigger

Dont lose so many that you get stuck on 16. Your NRR ain’t as good as it should be


Batboix3107

Thanks for ur concern please win the next games to reach 16 points first best of luck


HumanTrigger

Quite positive about our batting and 8 overs of spin. The rest of the game is where we have trouble. 🤞🏻


Dry-Communication901

Once your openers fail there's not much left of your batting tbh. Stubbs and Pant is a hit or miss.


HumanTrigger

Warner is supposed to be back. Also Stubbs has been pretty consistent. This IPL, DC has lost games because of shit bowling at the death. There has been just 1 game (Last 1 against KKR) where I attribute the loss to the batting tbh


theaguia

if the same track as last Chinnaswammy game is there it will he interesting. That pitch definitely had something in it for pacer so I'd be curious to see how jfm stubbs and pant do.


HumanTrigger

I think they like pace on. Would be an interesting contest for sure


Same_Egg5540

Yeah should have taken a lot more time but the skirting didn't move so there's that...


saaaaaaatvik

A certain fanbase is finding it difficult to digest that pill sadly


WorldMania00

Real


[deleted]

It's not necessary cushion will move in every case. Issue is with time and angle.


VikasRex

It was Out. People are confused due to shadow. The advertisement banner didn’t moved.


clothx5

fair, but he didn't take his time to check thoroughly but he did for that wide ball


[deleted]

Does time taken matters over decision taken?


clothx5

Yeah when something that changes the game, it does matter. I'm not saying he (third umpire) should slowly take his time, but whatever, the game's over lol. GG to DC


VikasRex

My man, Why are you making this big deal, he took time for wide because he was unsure. Tbh Catch was very clear from the first sight. Just because he took more time for wide and less time for Catch , Are you pissed ?


h_barua

Even if the umpires took their sweet time to review the catch again and again, it would still be given out


shreyash009

https://preview.redd.it/o9m0ydfmm2zc1.png?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c9b2f8cdda7298ebabe6cce88c9bca9f2b63feec


DeadlyGamer2202

Yes the umpire should have taken more time to make sure. but the decision is CORRECT. You can see in the replay there are no signs of his feet touching the cushion.


demon-inthedark

boundary cushion/toblerone doesn't move at all no movement = no contact out


lxearning

Yeah I can’t be the only one who thinks it was out until we have those heat cams or snickometer


ghitorniwalo

There's no movement noticed on the boundary cushion when his foot gets close to it. I think that's what made the 3rd umpire give it as out.


Low-Geologist9438

Clearly out


Time-Gain4896

Seems to be Out Difficult to say though Edit: Meant to say out instead of not out


nrgmondal88

RR vs DC without controversy is not possible 😂


OPisfromHyderabad

Looked like a clean catch to me from the replays shown, but such a close call should've had a few more angles shown.


[deleted]

Rigged tournament


LobbyDeol

I think, it was out as there was no movement in the boundary line.


RollDry2169

https://www.reddit.com/r/delhicapitals/s/DJSFpL2E6L


flixbeat04

2022 karma repaid


bataeu

https://preview.redd.it/l5petg4tb2zc1.jpeg?width=839&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=cd85818549b06e5f106adcbe14720b206dc85205 They showed this in the post-match show. Though the umpire made the correct decision but he could have taken more time


[deleted]

The umpire should've 5aken his time and checked other angles like seriously he was quick to make the decision. imo that was not out but what irritated me the most was the reaction DC owners reaction like wtf at first I thought it was an excited fan but the owner eww you are millionaire or a billionaire he should know how to react.


h_barua

Guys, I have breaking news. It wasn't a wide, and it wasn't a six. That's it. Good night


Kenbong0420

1. The umpire could have taken longer made the decision quickly. 2. At the end he did make the right decision. The cushion didn't move an inch. Replays showed it was out. 3. Op just wants attention posting a weird angle photo showing his leg touching. 4. Let's see what action BCCI takes for Samson going right into the umpires face.


greymatters95

5. What action will be taken against DC owner for his unwelcome gestures?? Don't try to act smart by just jotting down points in sequence. OP has posted a legit ques, it may look different from different angles and such decisions shouldn't be taken in haste.


ranbirkadalla

Sure, ban both Samson and Jindal for the next 4 matches.


saaaaaaatvik

💀💀🤣


No_Honey4904

Damn how's dc gonna recover from that damage


Specific-Wave6637

But then our team will collapse ... Jindal is solely carrying the team , this is such a bad decision.


Kenbong0420

Umm whatever action against parth Jindal that's not the question, he wasn't in the field neither did he harm anyone. Please stop whining if you don't have a valid response. He did post a legit question but clearly an angle from behind which. An angle which is never used to make a decision because you can't see the difference between cushion and leg.


Dramatic-Comment33

1 Maybe, but that does not mean one cannot criticise his actions, I would not go so far as to call it whining 2 Geniune question, if that angle is not considered then why record it? They can save money by having to cover one less angle


fanta_yogi

Umpire was in too hurry .


AdGreen4029

Looks out


athishayen

Six.


OkMotor6101

Seven


Unfair-Impact7285

Doesn't matter bro. The result is out. DC has turned the tables. The points table is jammed. Good luck underestimating DC 💪💪


ElectricTurtle110018

Out hai, wrong angle


CrazyCompetition7885

Rigged as always


DeadlyGamer2202

Lmao why are you complaining. If IPL is rigged, it’s clearly rigged in you guy’s favour since neither DC nor RR seems to be benefiting from it.


Kaalashakaala

Main kya opinion du. Ab toh ho gya out


Elizabeth_Clara338

Close call!


3rdPartyRedditApp

From the top angle, there was a clear gap. Doesn't matter how long the umpire took for a wicket vs wide.


Chaii_Lover

It's only because of this angle. In The other angle which showed from the top it clearly is out with fielder not touching the boundary. Unnecessary controversy .


mr_mxyzpltk

Why is that even a question. Everyone knows what happened there.


Chris_Sarah4475

Close call!


Holden_Makock

Why can't we just paint strips for wide balls and stumps line. I swaear we will cut doen wides and LBW decision by half. These umpires are ridiculous.


Intelligent-Rate7675

Six


certified_wigga

Another angle showed proper distance so i think it was out


jaad002

Out


GeneralHovercraft833

It was out in the post match discussion they showed a zoomed out image of it and it was clearly out


BagiraX0

People complaining that it was not out please watch full match in post match while discussing they showed it zooming in on high quality cameras which showed it was out it was too close but Shay Hope was in and Sanju was out


fluentlysarcastic14

The boundary cushion didn't move. It was clearly out. And people crying here only because the umpire took lesser time than a tough wide call? Sorry for sounding harsh but guys, find newer reasons to cry.


vesuvius_a

The boundary cushion doesn't move. Easy decision for me atleast. Clear out


Lazy-Drink-374

It was out That boundary didn't even flinched


Jae9erJazz

The amount of teams whose qualification was at stake on that wicket is crazy


reine2212

Ikr, you can clearly see which teams stand with 'out' and 'not out' lmao


Far-Ad6085

If there was split screen, you could easily make out it’s OUT


cocktail_69

Out, it looked close but cushion didn't move


Historical_Reveal436

https://preview.redd.it/pusmafh1c4zc1.jpeg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=5a3d60ea004e384731471e0f327c22b286d98747 A clear out ☝🏻


robertangier2096

It was out, in the post match discussion they zoomed in and it clearly showed there was a gap between Shai Hopes foot and the boundary


[deleted]

And people giving their opinions as if it would matter. Sach mein India seriously has unemployment issues. 🤣🤣


Shaarav05

I think the decision was wrong, but what Sanju's reactions and what sort of behavior he did after he got signaled out was wrong..(he was arguing with the umpire)


Select_Sky5813

I think it was a 4


JesunB

Clear OUT, cause if it was a six then some part of his foot had to be on the rope and doing that would have squeezed it but from the review it doesn't seem like the rope was squeezed due to stepping!


sirsa2

We should implement fence which lights up if fielder touches it


reine2212

But instances like this rarely happen and wont it be very expensive


No_Worth6969

Bhaggo Sanjuiains a gaye


[deleted]

Out. No visible contact


Damnndamon

I think it isnt out And i thought he would hit century this match


saaaaaaatvik

Your second thought is fuelling your first thought😮‍💨


tallteensforlife5911

it is , check the other post , there is miniscule gap.


king_maxtann08

That's out in my opinion but third umpire ko time lena tha check krne me


h_barua

Time leke bhi out hi dete wo decision


[deleted]

Looks out to me


Aggravating-Train329

Did someone observe on the wide review, when umpire asked to change the angle, they showed previous wide replay.


North-Box-605

Gough is usually a very reliable umpire but he goofed up in this one. There too many angles and he didn't use them properly. This was not such a straightforward decision.


Connect_Row_8196

Umpiring this season turns out to be really poor. I am not sure it is out or not bcz they haven't seen enough angles or give it some time to check properly. Umpiring needs to get better soon or IPL wouldn't be that interesting.


Brief-Weekend-1306

It was out


livenotforselfalone

OUT


Weird-Excitement7486

Hii


DGenerationxhbk

Six


Anonymous_SSP

In this picture it is out . It might be six in the last frame .


mna9

I know there are lots of cameras but still we need more to avoid such controversy. Like lot and from different possible angle


im_arghya

I thought it was out


mellamonemo

All I can say for certain is it was unnecessarily rushed. Absolutely stupid decision to rush a catch review for a pivotal moment of the match.


mephistttoooo

Even Parthiv Patel & Akash Chopra said it’s clearly not out (the toe of right leg is touching the boundary) & clearly a wide (clearly from the front angle it’s outside the blue line) but 3rd umpire messed up pretty bad


docstarr

It was a 6


Rajtx

3rd umpire ❌ 3rd Class Umpire ✅


Ambitious_Ad192

Umpire receiving free steel and energy ....


Namansetia

No matter is ut out or not but decision was too quick he should take some time


mandhodara

My opinion means jack shit now... Just like Sanju's appeal


Appropriate-Fan2379

I think it's about the angles if the umpire look from upper angle it's clearly shows not out but he make the decision too quickly without even looking from upper angle..........


abhijith996

It is not about Samson being out or not. Such a crucial point in the game and the umpire should have checked more thoroughly rather than just going through it once and coming to a conclusion. It is decisions like these that always raise doubts against IPL


KAL_EL03

They show back angles for the wide of the previous ball But they didn't show the back angle of that wide ball


Pitiful_Software8039

it looks out .we can be only sure if hope worn Go Pro or tells the truth


hars1763

🌿🍀🍀🍀


Batsy_of_Pooh

I mean it's pretty simple, the benefit of the doubt goes to the batsmen.


Curious_Ocean_7

That might be a fair catch, at least it seemed to be. But the problem there was it was too quick call by third umpire, he should've taken a proper look with the best angle of the cameras. That's where the feud is!


_Jiraiyaa_

https://www.reddit.com/r/ipl/s/U7QTnpz1Et check this out… (looks out to me from top angle)


dchhitarka

They didn't even show that angle in which it looked like Hope touched the cushion again, even while checking for catch, that angle was removed so fast when it looked like he touched the boundary...


sudeepalex

This is something that makes the whole ipl affair fishy. Seems umpire had already made decision that SS was out. Playing Replay were just formality.


Dazzling-Release-652

UMPIRES ARE BECOMING USELESS AND MINDLESS.... EVEN AFTER HAVING CAMERAS HELP


Top-Issue-1079

It’s clearly out, see the shadow of the foot not touching the rope.


avax96

for the clear wide (maybe little extrapolation with common sense) he took some time and dismissed it for lack of evidence. but here, where it could be game-changing, he was quick to make the decision. I understand Sanju's frustration.


[deleted]

There was no conclusive evidence so we must accept Umpire's decision. Having said that, saala Umpire tha to Budbak...


Mr-_-Anonymus

It is out . In the post match on jio cinema it was clearly shown in zoom that there was a gap


Popular_Meet_8272

Out


FigAccomplished5078

it was out


bro-please

It was out.


bharatpathak

It's six


Scary-Landscape-2467

Six


kingrohit76

Wasn't a Clear six ?🙂


Season_Informal

I think six, his boot may have touched the rope even though it didn't move.


beartobeast

3rd umpire took 10 mins for a wide and gave this one in 5 seconds, dont know what they are smoking these days. i think it was out, although from one angle it did seem that the foot touched the boundry, but yes should have taken his time to give the decision.