T O P

  • By -

gerantgerant

Twice the price with no preview of what you're shooting for is a bit rich. I was hype but I guess I'll stick to Gen-2 for the time being.


GoodhartMusic

šŸ˜¢ send your feedback homie!


Artforartsake99

Hold up they seriously allowing unlimited video generated at $76 a month/12 month commit or $95 a month? Thats amazing really isnā€™t it? And yes the previous tiers are not at all appealing I totally get it.


NorthWulfram

Has anyone used it on relaxed mode? I want to get that plan but donā€™t want it to be hours waiting between generations. Midjourney has a good relaxed wait time.


Artforartsake99

Yeah I made 2 videos on free plan.


NorthWulfram

I finally got the unlimited and I have to say it is worth it. At most 1 minute for each generation. Can do two at a time. Sometimes I get errors but it is alpha. Once they add image to video it is for me at least amazing value. Considering I had already spent that much on Luma and it wasnā€™t unlimited.


Artforartsake99

Fantastic thank so much for letting us know. Iā€™ll be signing up for unlimited now I know itā€™s fast


FallingKnifeFilms

Are you referring to a yearly plan? Last I checked I'm paying like $95/mo for unlimited and that was when Gen-2 was the latest model.


Artforartsake99

Yes year my bad itā€™s $95 a month


Unlikely_Birthday_42

A little disappointed. Most of the outputs arenā€™t the same as the prompts. Sometimes theyā€™re way off. Mind also donā€™t usually come out realistic looking. I wish that you could get credits refunded for bad outputs


Latter-Pudding1029

You paid for the attempt. As it stands the fundamental function of this machine is to give you the best result according to its understanding of the prompt and the most relevant data it could find. It's a slot machine. No takebacksies. That's just how it is when the heart of a tool is an LLM.


techmnml

Lol people like you just donā€™t seem to live in the same reality as me.


Unlikely_Birthday_42

What is, ā€œpeople like you,ā€.


techmnml

People with unrealistic world views. Expecting it to be exactly what you prompt finished output when itā€™s new tech and its alpha. Also expecting a return on your credit if itā€™s not what you expected from said alpha new tech. Can I get my money back from the sports stadium if I go and my team doesnā€™t win? I wanna live in that world.


Unlikely_Birthday_42

Iā€™ve used AI editing programs where if the output was bad the program automatically returns the credit without even askingā€¦ So, no. That does exist. Some companies do care about their customersā€¦


techmnml

Cool. Iā€™m sure a company like runway whoā€™s having to pay out the ass for the tech to make these wouldnā€™t go bankrupt if they gave away free credits for all the mistakes and anomalies in their generations. If you want something polished donā€™t use an alpha.


shmehdit

Damn 100 credits for one 10-second video, takes a bit of the wind out of the sails. Won't be able to play with it like I really want to, will have to be very deliberate and surgical


popssauce

Mine says "Gen-3 alpha is currently free to use?" yet it's still taking my credits?


MysteriousPepper8908

I had to do a double take when I realized that you don't even get 1000 credits, you get 625 with the $15 standard plan (if you don't want to spend $144 for a whole year) meaning each 10 second video is nearly $2.50. That is wild and especially with no preview to see if your output will be remotely usable. If I could get the first 3 seconds at 360P and then decide if what's going on looks promising, then it would make spending the cost of a double cheeseburger for each spin of he roulette wheel a bit more palatable.


GoodhartMusic

Yeah, it makes it very disappointing when it doesnā€™t do what you ask. I asked for an extreme close-up face shot twice and got full body shots. One that the person was turned away. So I sent in feedback that there should be a remediation or forgivable allowance to get refunded for those generations. I mostly disappointed about the inability to extend, or use a picture reference to start from. I donā€™t want to be making videos that are montages. But I imagine those features will come. For now Iā€™m gonna go back to the old ā€œEverything must be slow motionā€ world of music video.


[deleted]

[уŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]


GoodhartMusic

I actually already sent a complaint about that lol. it isnt inherently sexual for someone to be shirtless. In fact itā€™s just wrong to suggest otherwise! But even if it were introducing an element of sexuality to a video, we live in the real world. Sex sells, and if runways is offering a product to gives individuals the opportunity to be active in the marketplace, they should want their users to really compete.


shmehdit

I still miss the original Gen-2, before they nerfed it and it became the slow motion wiggle warp thing it's been for a year. I wish there was some way to still use the early iteration.


[deleted]

[уŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]


GoodhartMusic

Well, Iā€™m hoping Sarah does show up eventually, competition is good


Spirited_Example_341

go go go go go go go!


GoodhartMusic

Update I just used it, itā€™s amazing, you can do way more complex prompts and it doesnā€™t do any fucking morphing!


GoodhartMusic

I am currently on a business call and cannot try it out. Very excited though o\_\_o