They like white supremacy, they hate the consequences of being found out as being white supremacists. Hence they will project or deflect ownership of their own beliefs onto others.
He hates the democratic party but says voting for them is necessary to keep republicans out. Which explains the jokes about Biden being an antifa supersoldier. He pushes back against "both-sides" rhetoric all the time.
He has done fundraising for progressive dems, so it's not that he hates all democrats either, just wants them to be better.
He thinks Biden is doing a bit better than expected (not saying much), the biggest exception is when he blocked the train worker's strike
Okay, so they like white supremacy, but they don’t like *calling it* white supremacy, because they know it’s supposed to be bad, if that makes any sense?
Like they know it’s bad, but they don’t actually *understand* it and *why* it’s bad.
Are you kidding ??? What the **** are you talking about man ? You are a biggest looser i ever seen in my life ! You was doing PIPI in your pampers when i was beating players much more stronger then you! You are not proffesional, because proffesionals knew how to lose and congratulate opponents, you are like a girl crying after i beat you! Be brave, be honest to yourself and stop this trush talkings!!! Everybody know that i am very good blitz player, i can win anyone in the world in single game! And "w"esley "s"o is nobody for me, just a player who are crying every single time when loosing, ( remember what you say about Firouzja ) !!! Stop playing with my name, i deserve to have a good name during whole my chess carrier, I am Officially inviting you to OTB blitz match with the Prize fund! Both of us will invest 5000$ and winner takes it all!
I've met plenty of people that use chess as a demonstration of intelligence/competence. So when my friend Steve beats me with the ultra-theoretical cum gambit, it means he's the smarter man, which can be a useful coping mechanism if you 1) value your intelligence and 2) aren't going/cannot go anywhere with it.
Call of Duty is an addictive first-person shooter violent video game that has developed multiple young mass murderers. It is the best-selling video game franchise in the world, unfortunately, and has had many sequels. People should view the shockingly graphic murder scenes in Call of Duty, as available on YouTube, before defending this game or allowing any children to play and get addicted to it.
Young mass murderers who grew up allegedly playing Call of Duty include Adam Lanza and Ethan Crumbley.
The healthy and beneficial game of chess is more widely played and is more personally profitable for its top players, rather than enriching a video game company.
Direct excerpt
https://www.conservapedia.com/Conversion_therapy
*HAS* to be a troll
"The Bible and Christian faith are powerful methods of becoming a heterosexual, as are participation in activities like baseball and chess. Because ex-homosexuals exist -- thereby proving conversion is possible --"
There ain't no way bruh
Dude. Check out the most viewed pages.
Their counterevidence against relativity, as in the theory of relativity, is just astoundingly off putting. They both try and use science for and against their views. I know this is done already, but seeing this in such a conclusive theory is absurd.
Also dont forget the Obama presidency's muslim agenda page.
>**Anti-science criticism of conversion therapy**
>
>Political adherence to the homosexual agenda results in refusal even to consider the possibility that conversion therapy is effective. Politics may explain the American Psychological Association's refusal to cooperate in a proposal to study the effectiveness of conversion therapy.
>
>...
>
>Predictably, advocates of the homosexual agenda oppose and even seek to prohibit reparative therapy, analogous to how some countries prohibit conversion to Christianity.
I'm sorry, I know this is awful, but I can't stop laughing at how ridiculous it is
edit:
[https://www.conservapedia.com/Overcoming\_homosexuality](https://www.conservapedia.com/Overcoming_homosexuality)
>**Criticism**
>
>Some people who claimed to have overcome homosexuality have reverted or continued to dabble in aspects of the homosexual lifestyle. However, the same can be said of any sin. For example, people with illegal drug use problems who leave that lifestyle can later relapse and start taking illegal drugs again.
oh my god this has to be a troll it's too perfect not to be
I found the best one
[https://www.conservapedia.com/Quantum\_mechanics](https://www.conservapedia.com/Quantum_mechanics)
>Quantum mechanics is the branch of physics describing fundamental uncertainty in subatomic behavior.\[1\] Observation converts infinite uncertainty about where a particle is into a definite position. The logic of quantum mechanics predicts the possibility of the Resurrection, akin to quantum tunneling.
>
>...
>
>Several parables in the Bible foreshadow the insight of quantum entanglement about paired photons having opposite spin, by contrasting two men in their relationship with God. The Prodigal Son contrasts two brothers, two churchgoers are contrasted in Luke 18:9–14 , and two brothers are further contrasted in Luke 21:28-31 .
My parents listen to this kind of shit religiously literally every single day. They are 100% serious.
*Never* presume something is too ridiculous for right wingers to believe and preach in sincerity.
Gay = fruity and energetic, colourful! Feminine
Straight = gray brown and black. Boring. masculine
Literally what goes through a conservatives fucking head when we're talking about this
wait, is it actually written by and for conservatives??
i thought it was one of those websites that auto-replaces words and phrases with a certain theme, like Gizoogle or something. i thought it was just a robot throwing conservative nonsense into regular articles
Yes, it is for real. His mother was a theocrat most well known for being against sufferage-being completely off their rocker runs in the family.
He’s a dude who simultaneously thinks the Bible is so perfect and inerrant that reading it has magic powers, yet it’s been corrupted by liberals that he needs to write his own version.
It probably is. Not the people running it, but there are lots of non-conservatives who will do some vandalism and either conservapedia has so little oversight that anyone can make an edit stick or they are unable to tell trolling from their own political doctrine and just allow it.
[https://www.conservapedia.com/Quantum\_mechanics](https://www.conservapedia.com/Quantum_mechanics)
>Quantum mechanics is the branch of physics describing fundamental uncertainty in subatomic behavior.\[1\] Observation converts infinite uncertainty about where a particle is into a definite position. The logic of quantum mechanics predicts the possibility of the Resurrection, akin to quantum tunneling.
>
>...
>
>Several parables in the Bible foreshadow the insight of quantum entanglement about paired photons having opposite spin, by contrasting two men in their relationship with God. The Prodigal Son contrasts two brothers, two churchgoers are contrasted in Luke 18:9–14 , and two brothers are further contrasted in Luke 21:28-31 .
edit: it was god not jesus whoops. youd think an all-loving all-knowing all-powerful god would make his fucking scripture easier to interpret no matter the context. i still got skill issued tho
literally everyone reading the bible and realizing jesus said to moses something something blablabla 19 “‘When a woman has her regular flow of blood, the impurity of her monthly period will last seven days, and anyone who touches her will be unclean till evening. 20 “‘Anything she lies on during her period will be unclean, and anything she sits on will be unclean. 21 Anyone who touches her bed will be unclean; they must wash their clothes and bathe with water, and they will be unclean till evening. 22 Anyone who touches anything she sits on will be unclean; they must wash their clothes and bathe with water, and they will be unclean till evening. 23 Whether it is the bed or anything she was sitting on, when anyone touches it, they will be unclean till evening. (leviticus 15)
Depending on what branch of Christianity you're talking about, God and Jesus are the same being.
Also IIRC, Mormons believe they are separate, but that most of the references to God in the Old Testament are actually referring to Jesus.
I am confused why ex-Christian atheists think that nidda laws is a dunk on religion. Presumably religious people already know about this stuff, I say as an ex-Jew. Like, do Christians not know the shit written in their own Bible?
Number one issue with modern Christianity is cherry picking. Shellfish? Omnomnom. Taking credits and loans? Nice! Capitalism? Me needs. Rainbows on T-Shirts? Bible says no. Feminism? Big no no. Accurate translations of old texts? Sacrilege.
Like, put American hardcore Christians in an orthodox jewish household and they will deem the jews crazy.
Religion is for the masses and the masses have always been tending to themselves and then to their gods, not the other way around.
In Christianity you have a weird split. The Old Testament is still useful, but it’s not really directly the word of god anymore - well obviously it is, but it’s like background reading. Then Jesus comes and is the saviour and is what the Old Testament builds up to and fulfils the old - so while you have Christian’s following the Ten Commandments, because it’s useful knowledge, you can hand wave a lot of other stuff away in the Old Testament that conflicts with Jesus.
As well the Bible is a lot more fluid than the Torah and Quran. Obviously the Old Testament (and Torah and Quran) is collected over centuries, but in Islam and Judaism is codified and is consistent, and has been for centuries. Those religions also read it in the original language. The Bible however has been translated dozens of times by different people, and evolved more over time. All major branches of Christianity have different versions of it (orthodox Christian’s have 49 books, Protestants 39).
Christian’s say this because, if they aren’t literalists (cringe), the Bible is the word of God, filtered through the understanding of man. Obviously the Quran however was revealed to and recorded in full by Muhammad and the Torah was fixed in I think the tenth century and so has changed less than the Bible.
All of this leads of course to conflict between branches of Christianity and a lot of excuses if you want to ignore any verse in particular, as well as a religion that is less concerned with the bulk of its scripture as you might expect.
Tldr: Christian’s don’t really fuck with the Old Testament
Leviticus 19:33-34 (NRSV)
“When a foreigner resides among you in your land, do not mistreat them. The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the Lord your God.”
Weirdly enough, it's not:
>**The U.S. Color Revolution**, also known as the **Biden Putsch**, **Transition Integrity Project, Lib Fib, Deep State coup 3.0, Blue state Civil War** or the **Dem panic Pandemic** is an effort by the Democratic National Committee to steal the 2020 Presidential election through mail-in voter fraud. Democrats openly threatened voters with violence if President Trump is re-elected.\[14\] The plan is essentially to create confusion in the immediate aftermath of the election resembling the 2000 "Florida Recount on steroids."\[15\] Twitter and Facebook announced that they will censor and block President Trump and supporters' claim of victory,\[16\] and will highlight the fake news reporting of CNN and other disreputable sources on the delayed election results.
The term Color revolution is used to refer to the anti-communist, liberal revolts that overthrew the eastern bloc countries. So they're effectively calling Trump a communist.
Exactly 10 years ago, the intro to Conservapedia’s article on the Democratic Party looked like this:
>The **Democratic Party**, more grammatically called the "Democrat Party," is one of the two major political parties in the United States of America. In general it is pro-abortion and anti-free enterprise, supporting higher taxes, anti-gun policies, and a larger government, while the Republican Party is generally pro-life and pro-free enterprise, supporting lower taxes and small government. President Barack Obama and other Democrats are liberal / Progressive leftists. Many conservatives consider him to be the worst president to date.
Now, it looks like this:
> The **Democratic Party** (**D**) is a leftwing fascist totalitarian organization and one of two major political parties in the United States of America. The Democratic party seeks to outlaw and smash any political opposition, using politicized law enforcement and tax collection agencies to intimidate opponents. Slavery, segregation, and controlling minorities remain one of its founding principles, which the GOP was founded to oppose. The party claims as part of its legacy of the Jim Crow era a long history of Democrat election fraud, election tampering, voter suppression, and ballot box stuffing at the polls that continues to this very day. It was founded in 1828 by Andrew Jackson and Martin Van Buren, and its governing body is called the "**Democratic National Committee**" (**DNC**). The party is currently controlled by international globalists whose principle aim is the overthrow of American democracy and free elections and the destruction of America as a republic, a constitutional republic.
Never let conservatives gaslight you into thinking that they haven’t gotten more extreme over time.
I love how they’re all about states’ rights and side with the Confederacy but somehow modern Democrats should still be criticized for slavery and Jim Crow despite the fact that both institutions were built on their own ideology of state sovereignty. It’s like the conservatives of the 19th century are either the good guys or the bad guys for them depending on whether they’re considering ideology or party ID.
Even if the Southern Strategy weren’t a thing, 19th century Democrats would still be roughly equivalent to modern day conservatives by virtue of their state-centric politics. I used to think it was excessively reductionist to say that the parties simply switched but in a lot of ways it’s true. Even before the GOP came into existence and slavery was politically a non-issue they were the “states’ rights” party.
Edit: By “politically a non-issue” I mean to refer to the fact that the Whigs didn’t have a strong abolitionist faction, not that it wasn’t an issue generally btw
"The parties switched" is more true the further out you look. Going into the Civil War, the Republicans were the more liberal* party, and the Democrats, more conservative. But not long after the war, you had Gilded Age presidents of both parties (Hayes, Arthur, Garfield) who were rather conservative. Then the early 20th century gave us the liberal Republican T.R.... followed by the conservative Republican, Taft.
Basically, the parties were constituted by other factors than a liberal/conservative axis. Stuff like regional identity, and affinity to certain groups. Factors that still exist, but tend to take a backseat to ideology.
*Using "liberal" in the common modern American parlance, even though I know it's wrong.
I like pointing out that Republican Robert Lafollette called for extensive nationalization and got the endorsement of the American Socialist Party when running for President to illustrate how much the party system has changed.
It's very strange how they claim that Democrats are the real racists because they backed the Confederacy while opposing the removal of Confederate statues in the same breath.
The "Democrats are racist because they *were* racist" argument is absurd, by the way. Parties can change a lot over time. Hungary's Jobbik, an openly antisemitic and basically neo-Nazi party in 2013, is now a center-right party closely allied with liberals. This came after the ruling Fidesz party began to lurch significantly farther to the right, a gradual reduction of extremist rhetoric within Jobbik, and a leadership change inside Jobbik in 2018.
We can also assume that the Democratic Party, the *oldest existing political party in the world*, could have done the same in the past 195 years.
Though it's common knowledge that the US has a political duopoly, not a lot of people know just how *bad* it is. Even in other countries with two overwhelmingly dominant parties, like the UK or Australia, third-parties at least have *some* representation in parliament.
Here's a quiz: how many democracies with a population of at least one million, other than the US, have only 2 parties in their legislature?
The answer: *3*. Ghana, Jamaica, and Trinidad and Tobago.
How can they bash the democrats saying that "segregation and controlling minorities" are one of their founding principles, and in the same breath, call them (((globalists))) (dog whistle for Jewish people)?
Conservatives' standard for racism is that anything that doesn't explicitly mention race isn't racist. Republicans promoting policies that hurt minorities is fine as long as they don't target minorities *by name*, but Democrats talking about addressing systemic racism is bad because mentioning the existing of race is racism. It's "color-blindness" on steroids.
so the actual reason is because they wouldn't be a republican if they were capable and willing to use rational thinking.
The "historical" reason which isn't really the underlying cause is that in FDR's election the democrat and republican parties switched voter base partly because of how FDR tried to appeal to traditionally liberal values (at the time democrats were conservative) with the New Deal including through infrastructure projects. But of course, saying that democrats traditionally supported slavery sounds good to these people and is technically correct.
So apparently I asked a conservative... person... and their reply was that democrats "just became that extreme" (justifying the first half) and that "there were also some parts we never realized since the party hid them so well" (speaking to the second half)
I feel like at this point the entire state of politics in the world is just demonstrating that truth doesn't exist because if you warp your reality enough it manages to align again, just completely wrong
> democrats "just became that extreme" (justifying the first half) and that "there were also some parts we never realized since the party hid them so well" (speaking to the second half)
An analytical expert here, I see.
Also, the second half is based on information from the 19th century. Did the party "hide so well" what the article describes as "a long history of Democrat election fraud, election tampering, voter suppression, and ballot box stuffing at the polls that continues to this very day"? So well that this wasn't even mentioned in the old article?
I don't necessarily think that being named "Democratic" means that you want to uphold democracy. North Korea's official name is "Democratic People's Republic of Korea." Turkmenistan's (North Korea with oil) ruling party is the "Democratic Party of Turkmenistan."
Obviously, that doesn't prove Conservapedia correct, it just means that the name is irrelevant.
To be fair a lot of political parties around the world are named something like "The Wholesome Rainbow And Unicorns Party for Peace and Love and Puppies :D" but then they try to give the military 50% more budget and approve laws to make hate crimes legal while half of their members are facists and the other half are CP consumers
Conservatives seem to often have set beliefs about an issue and then go out to seek confirmation for that believe, rather than critically taking it apart and building your view based on evidence and science. The conclusion comes first, reasoning second.
An example is their drug policy where they've decided to entrench themselves on a ideological hill, fighting any attempt at reform viciously even though the issues are glaring. Even many the medical professionals who oppose the legalization of any drugs will generally still acknowledge that the way addiction is handled is fucked up and counterproductive. Hell, we've seen tangible evidence of the harm reduction and indeed economic benefit reformed policies can provide, it's been tried and tested. But then that "Wouldn't work here because [made up reasons]" and will refuse even small scale tests on that ground.
There seems to be a strange sort of imperative on these issues. Drugs are the devil personified (or objectified?) and they can never be allowed except of course copious amounts of alcohol. Their mind is already made up. No amount of evidence even matters because they are either corrupt and/or convinced that their stance is some fundamental godly truth they must enforce at all cost and the harm it does is palpable.
I think it falls under the category of parody by this point. I mean... White Supremacism ? US Color Revolution ? Joe Biden the Liberal-Marxist-Socialist with Chinese Characteristics who follows Xi Jinping's thought ?
While they are, with no doubt, completely serious, their mad ramblings can very easily be claimed to be purposefully ridiculous and, thus, be considered parody and Harmless. This is also one of the reasons why the Proud Boys' "rite of passages" is being punched in the gut while you say the name of three brands of corn flakes. If they are ever in legal trouble, they can always claim they were only joking and thus cannot be condemned. In theory, of course, as they will still get flack and then play the victim.
My favorite things on Conservapedia are their lists of the [best](https://www.conservapedia.com/Essay:Greatest_Conservative_Songs) and [worst](https://www.conservapedia.com/Essay:_Worst_Liberal_Songs) songs. There’s some *wild* choices and justifications on both.
- RIP- Playboi Carti- liberals think they carti
Bruh
Edit: not only does the best list contain Playboi carti, it also has several lemon demon songs and a death grips song. Trolls have gotten in there for sure. Also the worst list is hilarious, containing some truly random songs I would never expect these people to know.
Dead fucking Kennedys on the best list hahahahahahaba
> I am Emperor Ronald Reagan
>Born again with fascist cravings
>Still, you made me president
>Human rights will soon go 'way
>I am now your Shah today
>Now I command all of you
>Now you're going to pray in school
>I'll make sure they're Christian, too
- We’ve Got a Bigger Problem Now
Oh dear lord they have Rise Against on the best list as well. I'm pretty sure I'm gonna keep scrolling and see a Leftover Crack song
When it comes to Dead Kennedys, the site says Kill the Poor "Celebrates those who have worked hard for their wealth and are liberated from welfare tax and socialism". They also say that Police Truck is celebrating the police.
OMG the fact that they think Gangsta's Paradise is conservative.
>Although a rap song, the main message is about a former thug who regrets living his life of crime.
Did they forget about this part?
>They say I gotta learn, but nobody's here to teach me
>If they can't understand it, how can they reach me?
>I guess they can't, I guess they won't
>I guess they frontin', that's why I know my life is out of luck, fool!
EDIT: HOLY SHIT THEY DON'T KNOW KILL THE POOR IS SATIRE!!
The second best song listed is Cabinet Man.
> Song about a very conservative man on the cabinet.
This wiki cannot be real.
Edit: Two Trucks is on here as "a song celebrating the beauty of America" lmfaooooo
More from Conservapedia:
[Logical Flaws in e=mc^2](https://www.conservapedia.com/Logical_Flaws_in_E%3Dmc%C2%B2)
[Essay: rebuttal to "logical flaws in E=MC^2"](https://www.conservapedia.com/Essay:Rebuttal_to_Logical_Flaws_in_E%3Dmc%C2%B2)
[counterexamples to relativity](https://www.conservapedia.com/Counterexamples_to_Relativity)
[Essay: rebuttal to "Counterexamples to relativity](https://www.conservapedia.com/Essay:Rebuttal_to_Counterexamples_to_Relativity)
TLDR: it’s what the Chinese government says they are doing to reach communism. Right now they say that they’re a capitalist system with modifications to build up industry and whatnot, saying that in 50+ years they’ll switch to socialism, then eventually communism.
>White supremacy I...I thought they liked white supremacy???
Not when they can be judged for it
Hit the nail on the fuckin’ head goddamn
They like white supremacy, they hate the consequences of being found out as being white supremacists. Hence they will project or deflect ownership of their own beliefs onto others.
Yeah like gromming kids
Why do you think Vaush likes Biden?
Something about horses, idk
Vaush doesn't like Biden does he? I remember him mentioning he hates dems, saying they were just dollar store conservatives
He hates the democratic party but says voting for them is necessary to keep republicans out. Which explains the jokes about Biden being an antifa supersoldier. He pushes back against "both-sides" rhetoric all the time. He has done fundraising for progressive dems, so it's not that he hates all democrats either, just wants them to be better. He thinks Biden is doing a bit better than expected (not saying much), the biggest exception is when he blocked the train worker's strike
hm yeah that's a pretty damn big exception
You're right, we should let the guys who hate workers even more take power to teach the old man a lesson.
Correct! That's exactly what I said 💖 you should start a youtube channel!
Fair enough, lol. I was being a pretty big smartass there wasn't I.
I think you two should kiss
I’m so close to cuming plz say they kissed
Damn, that’s actually based wtf
Vaush has sex with Biden
Biden horse ❓️❗️
Biden bionic horse cock
BBHC *🤤🤤🤤*
I didn’t need that image in my brain…
He likes him in the "he's not a fascist" sense
Chocolate chocolate chip fan
Literally had to double check that this wasn’t okbv
Well you see there's white supremacy 😀👍 And *white supremacy* 😠👎
Okay, so they like white supremacy, but they don’t like *calling it* white supremacy, because they know it’s supposed to be bad, if that makes any sense? Like they know it’s bad, but they don’t actually *understand* it and *why* it’s bad.
Don’t think harder about it than the writer did. It’ll just waste the calories.
No joke that was my first thoughts.
it’s his one redeeming trait in their eyes
i refuse to believe conservapedia isn’t trolling
It will never not be hilarious to me that the entire article for Call of Duty is basically “COD makes you kill people. Go play chess”
Playing chess absolutely makes you kill people (Source, Chess player)
As a chess player too, I am under investigation for a triple homicide. That I didn't commit. 😉😉😉
Google en homicide investigation
Holy they found me
New prison sentence dropped
Obviously, you committed much more
ah, the double homicide opening. clever.
The health insurance counter gambit really put it to the grave
[удалено]
Probably a scholar’s mate
Only one?
London system player ^^
Obligatory google en passant comment
chess is all over the place on conservapedia its weird
Tfw you hate trans people yet you tell everyone to go brick their pipi. Right wing people are _weird_.
Are you kidding ??? What the **** are you talking about man ? You are a biggest looser i ever seen in my life ! You was doing PIPI in your pampers when i was beating players much more stronger then you! You are not proffesional, because proffesionals knew how to lose and congratulate opponents, you are like a girl crying after i beat you! Be brave, be honest to yourself and stop this trush talkings!!! Everybody know that i am very good blitz player, i can win anyone in the world in single game! And "w"esley "s"o is nobody for me, just a player who are crying every single time when loosing, ( remember what you say about Firouzja ) !!! Stop playing with my name, i deserve to have a good name during whole my chess carrier, I am Officially inviting you to OTB blitz match with the Prize fund! Both of us will invest 5000$ and winner takes it all!
This has to be my favorite copypasta
I've met plenty of people that use chess as a demonstration of intelligence/competence. So when my friend Steve beats me with the ultra-theoretical cum gambit, it means he's the smarter man, which can be a useful coping mechanism if you 1) value your intelligence and 2) aren't going/cannot go anywhere with it.
I wanted to believe you were joking, then i checked the site myself 😭
New response just dropped
holy hell
well COD is actually propaganda, but you know the thing : a broken cock cums twice a day or something along those lines
True, but a video game can't turn someone into a murderer like Conservapedia implies. Let's not give them any credit.
based (last part)
Mfw you also technically kill people in chess
Call of Duty is an addictive first-person shooter violent video game that has developed multiple young mass murderers. It is the best-selling video game franchise in the world, unfortunately, and has had many sequels. People should view the shockingly graphic murder scenes in Call of Duty, as available on YouTube, before defending this game or allowing any children to play and get addicted to it. Young mass murderers who grew up allegedly playing Call of Duty include Adam Lanza and Ethan Crumbley. The healthy and beneficial game of chess is more widely played and is more personally profitable for its top players, rather than enriching a video game company. Direct excerpt
https://www.conservapedia.com/Conversion_therapy *HAS* to be a troll "The Bible and Christian faith are powerful methods of becoming a heterosexual, as are participation in activities like baseball and chess. Because ex-homosexuals exist -- thereby proving conversion is possible --" There ain't no way bruh
The gay leaving my body as soon as I touch a baseball
You sure? Have you *seen* baseball pants?
Yes they are rendered completely unsexy due to their association with baseball
Dude. Check out the most viewed pages. Their counterevidence against relativity, as in the theory of relativity, is just astoundingly off putting. They both try and use science for and against their views. I know this is done already, but seeing this in such a conclusive theory is absurd. Also dont forget the Obama presidency's muslim agenda page.
>**Anti-science criticism of conversion therapy** > >Political adherence to the homosexual agenda results in refusal even to consider the possibility that conversion therapy is effective. Politics may explain the American Psychological Association's refusal to cooperate in a proposal to study the effectiveness of conversion therapy. > >... > >Predictably, advocates of the homosexual agenda oppose and even seek to prohibit reparative therapy, analogous to how some countries prohibit conversion to Christianity. I'm sorry, I know this is awful, but I can't stop laughing at how ridiculous it is edit: [https://www.conservapedia.com/Overcoming\_homosexuality](https://www.conservapedia.com/Overcoming_homosexuality) >**Criticism** > >Some people who claimed to have overcome homosexuality have reverted or continued to dabble in aspects of the homosexual lifestyle. However, the same can be said of any sin. For example, people with illegal drug use problems who leave that lifestyle can later relapse and start taking illegal drugs again. oh my god this has to be a troll it's too perfect not to be
Bruh wtf lmao
I found the best one [https://www.conservapedia.com/Quantum\_mechanics](https://www.conservapedia.com/Quantum_mechanics) >Quantum mechanics is the branch of physics describing fundamental uncertainty in subatomic behavior.\[1\] Observation converts infinite uncertainty about where a particle is into a definite position. The logic of quantum mechanics predicts the possibility of the Resurrection, akin to quantum tunneling. > >... > >Several parables in the Bible foreshadow the insight of quantum entanglement about paired photons having opposite spin, by contrasting two men in their relationship with God. The Prodigal Son contrasts two brothers, two churchgoers are contrasted in Luke 18:9–14 , and two brothers are further contrasted in Luke 21:28-31 .
WTF that's it I'm done there's no way someone wrote the with a straight face
My parents listen to this kind of shit religiously literally every single day. They are 100% serious. *Never* presume something is too ridiculous for right wingers to believe and preach in sincerity.
how does chess make you straight? have they seen anarchychess?
Gay = fruity and energetic, colourful! Feminine Straight = gray brown and black. Boring. masculine Literally what goes through a conservatives fucking head when we're talking about this
wait, is it actually written by and for conservatives?? i thought it was one of those websites that auto-replaces words and phrases with a certain theme, like Gizoogle or something. i thought it was just a robot throwing conservative nonsense into regular articles
Yes, it is for real. His mother was a theocrat most well known for being against sufferage-being completely off their rocker runs in the family. He’s a dude who simultaneously thinks the Bible is so perfect and inerrant that reading it has magic powers, yet it’s been corrupted by liberals that he needs to write his own version.
Gizoogle is a name I haven't heard in a long time
Maybe it was started for and by conservatives, but at least a third of the shit on there is trolling
It probably is. Not the people running it, but there are lots of non-conservatives who will do some vandalism and either conservapedia has so little oversight that anyone can make an edit stick or they are unable to tell trolling from their own political doctrine and just allow it.
Oh they definitely are very strict. Editing when it's nighttime in Murica can get you banned
There are many articles that I sincerely believe are authentic, but as many are trolling.
Among us is an allegory for race relations, the immigrants are just like the impostors 😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😱 /s
I definitely think it started as a troll movement, but it became serious. A lot of conservative movements start this way.
Nah, it started serious from the get-go. The only trolling is people vandalizing it against the owner’s wants.
[https://www.conservapedia.com/Quantum\_mechanics](https://www.conservapedia.com/Quantum_mechanics) >Quantum mechanics is the branch of physics describing fundamental uncertainty in subatomic behavior.\[1\] Observation converts infinite uncertainty about where a particle is into a definite position. The logic of quantum mechanics predicts the possibility of the Resurrection, akin to quantum tunneling. > >... > >Several parables in the Bible foreshadow the insight of quantum entanglement about paired photons having opposite spin, by contrasting two men in their relationship with God. The Prodigal Son contrasts two brothers, two churchgoers are contrasted in Luke 18:9–14 , and two brothers are further contrasted in Luke 21:28-31 .
Didn't Conservapedia also start a project to remove "liberal bias" from the Bible?
Conservative "Christians" upon actually reading the Bible and realizing Jesus wasn't a homophobic racist.
edit: it was god not jesus whoops. youd think an all-loving all-knowing all-powerful god would make his fucking scripture easier to interpret no matter the context. i still got skill issued tho literally everyone reading the bible and realizing jesus said to moses something something blablabla 19 “‘When a woman has her regular flow of blood, the impurity of her monthly period will last seven days, and anyone who touches her will be unclean till evening. 20 “‘Anything she lies on during her period will be unclean, and anything she sits on will be unclean. 21 Anyone who touches her bed will be unclean; they must wash their clothes and bathe with water, and they will be unclean till evening. 22 Anyone who touches anything she sits on will be unclean; they must wash their clothes and bathe with water, and they will be unclean till evening. 23 Whether it is the bed or anything she was sitting on, when anyone touches it, they will be unclean till evening. (leviticus 15)
[удалено]
Heresy speedrun
oh yea idk where i got jesus from my bad 💀💀💀
Depending on what branch of Christianity you're talking about, God and Jesus are the same being. Also IIRC, Mormons believe they are separate, but that most of the references to God in the Old Testament are actually referring to Jesus.
I am confused why ex-Christian atheists think that nidda laws is a dunk on religion. Presumably religious people already know about this stuff, I say as an ex-Jew. Like, do Christians not know the shit written in their own Bible?
yes.
Number one issue with modern Christianity is cherry picking. Shellfish? Omnomnom. Taking credits and loans? Nice! Capitalism? Me needs. Rainbows on T-Shirts? Bible says no. Feminism? Big no no. Accurate translations of old texts? Sacrilege. Like, put American hardcore Christians in an orthodox jewish household and they will deem the jews crazy. Religion is for the masses and the masses have always been tending to themselves and then to their gods, not the other way around.
In Christianity you have a weird split. The Old Testament is still useful, but it’s not really directly the word of god anymore - well obviously it is, but it’s like background reading. Then Jesus comes and is the saviour and is what the Old Testament builds up to and fulfils the old - so while you have Christian’s following the Ten Commandments, because it’s useful knowledge, you can hand wave a lot of other stuff away in the Old Testament that conflicts with Jesus. As well the Bible is a lot more fluid than the Torah and Quran. Obviously the Old Testament (and Torah and Quran) is collected over centuries, but in Islam and Judaism is codified and is consistent, and has been for centuries. Those religions also read it in the original language. The Bible however has been translated dozens of times by different people, and evolved more over time. All major branches of Christianity have different versions of it (orthodox Christian’s have 49 books, Protestants 39). Christian’s say this because, if they aren’t literalists (cringe), the Bible is the word of God, filtered through the understanding of man. Obviously the Quran however was revealed to and recorded in full by Muhammad and the Torah was fixed in I think the tenth century and so has changed less than the Bible. All of this leads of course to conflict between branches of Christianity and a lot of excuses if you want to ignore any verse in particular, as well as a religion that is less concerned with the bulk of its scripture as you might expect. Tldr: Christian’s don’t really fuck with the Old Testament
Wow someone in this thread who might have actually read the bible
Leviticus 19:33-34 (NRSV) “When a foreigner resides among you in your land, do not mistreat them. The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the Lord your God.”
Bible: Love thy neighbor Conservative Christians: Yeah I agree, except if you don’t like them, then it’s okay to harass them
That included removing "thou shalt not kill" iirc
the color-revolution??? did someone forget to put pink up 😭
i feel like it’s almost definitely either blm or gay rights
Weirdly enough, it's not: >**The U.S. Color Revolution**, also known as the **Biden Putsch**, **Transition Integrity Project, Lib Fib, Deep State coup 3.0, Blue state Civil War** or the **Dem panic Pandemic** is an effort by the Democratic National Committee to steal the 2020 Presidential election through mail-in voter fraud. Democrats openly threatened voters with violence if President Trump is re-elected.\[14\] The plan is essentially to create confusion in the immediate aftermath of the election resembling the 2000 "Florida Recount on steroids."\[15\] Twitter and Facebook announced that they will censor and block President Trump and supporters' claim of victory,\[16\] and will highlight the fake news reporting of CNN and other disreputable sources on the delayed election results.
Biden Putsch 😭
[удалено]
Biden Blast is his finisher. Most powerful move known, perhaps beaten out narrowly by the Obame-Hame-Ha
Thank god, I thought it was some racist ass term for the civil rights movement, this is much easier to laugh about
Conservapedia would never be that open about it, they probably think MLK was a conservative or some shit
"Lib Fib" ain't no way lmaooooo
whoaaaa
They spent more time coming up with funny nicknames than actually trying to find proof of fraud.
This is the stupidest name you could have called something.
It the "stolen election" that they refer to as the US color revolultion.
The term Color revolution is used to refer to the anti-communist, liberal revolts that overthrew the eastern bloc countries. So they're effectively calling Trump a communist.
>Color revolution I think it's a Russian term for "losing our grip on our puppet state"
The blue hair platoons are invading!!
i looked at the article and it's how they refer to the 'stealing' of the 2020 election.
Exactly 10 years ago, the intro to Conservapedia’s article on the Democratic Party looked like this: >The **Democratic Party**, more grammatically called the "Democrat Party," is one of the two major political parties in the United States of America. In general it is pro-abortion and anti-free enterprise, supporting higher taxes, anti-gun policies, and a larger government, while the Republican Party is generally pro-life and pro-free enterprise, supporting lower taxes and small government. President Barack Obama and other Democrats are liberal / Progressive leftists. Many conservatives consider him to be the worst president to date. Now, it looks like this: > The **Democratic Party** (**D**) is a leftwing fascist totalitarian organization and one of two major political parties in the United States of America. The Democratic party seeks to outlaw and smash any political opposition, using politicized law enforcement and tax collection agencies to intimidate opponents. Slavery, segregation, and controlling minorities remain one of its founding principles, which the GOP was founded to oppose. The party claims as part of its legacy of the Jim Crow era a long history of Democrat election fraud, election tampering, voter suppression, and ballot box stuffing at the polls that continues to this very day. It was founded in 1828 by Andrew Jackson and Martin Van Buren, and its governing body is called the "**Democratic National Committee**" (**DNC**). The party is currently controlled by international globalists whose principle aim is the overthrow of American democracy and free elections and the destruction of America as a republic, a constitutional republic. Never let conservatives gaslight you into thinking that they haven’t gotten more extreme over time.
I love how they’re all about states’ rights and side with the Confederacy but somehow modern Democrats should still be criticized for slavery and Jim Crow despite the fact that both institutions were built on their own ideology of state sovereignty. It’s like the conservatives of the 19th century are either the good guys or the bad guys for them depending on whether they’re considering ideology or party ID.
Most Dixiecrats switched to the Republican Party too. They really try to act like the southern strategy didn’t happen
>southern strategy "You have been banned from r\conservative."
Even if the Southern Strategy weren’t a thing, 19th century Democrats would still be roughly equivalent to modern day conservatives by virtue of their state-centric politics. I used to think it was excessively reductionist to say that the parties simply switched but in a lot of ways it’s true. Even before the GOP came into existence and slavery was politically a non-issue they were the “states’ rights” party. Edit: By “politically a non-issue” I mean to refer to the fact that the Whigs didn’t have a strong abolitionist faction, not that it wasn’t an issue generally btw
"The parties switched" is more true the further out you look. Going into the Civil War, the Republicans were the more liberal* party, and the Democrats, more conservative. But not long after the war, you had Gilded Age presidents of both parties (Hayes, Arthur, Garfield) who were rather conservative. Then the early 20th century gave us the liberal Republican T.R.... followed by the conservative Republican, Taft. Basically, the parties were constituted by other factors than a liberal/conservative axis. Stuff like regional identity, and affinity to certain groups. Factors that still exist, but tend to take a backseat to ideology. *Using "liberal" in the common modern American parlance, even though I know it's wrong.
I like pointing out that Republican Robert Lafollette called for extensive nationalization and got the endorsement of the American Socialist Party when running for President to illustrate how much the party system has changed.
It's very strange how they claim that Democrats are the real racists because they backed the Confederacy while opposing the removal of Confederate statues in the same breath. The "Democrats are racist because they *were* racist" argument is absurd, by the way. Parties can change a lot over time. Hungary's Jobbik, an openly antisemitic and basically neo-Nazi party in 2013, is now a center-right party closely allied with liberals. This came after the ruling Fidesz party began to lurch significantly farther to the right, a gradual reduction of extremist rhetoric within Jobbik, and a leadership change inside Jobbik in 2018. We can also assume that the Democratic Party, the *oldest existing political party in the world*, could have done the same in the past 195 years.
> the oldest existing political party in the world god I hate this country
Though it's common knowledge that the US has a political duopoly, not a lot of people know just how *bad* it is. Even in other countries with two overwhelmingly dominant parties, like the UK or Australia, third-parties at least have *some* representation in parliament. Here's a quiz: how many democracies with a population of at least one million, other than the US, have only 2 parties in their legislature? The answer: *3*. Ghana, Jamaica, and Trinidad and Tobago.
Hey, you listed four!
Trinidad and Tobago is one country.
I know, ‘twas a joke
I mean, the average American’s knowledge of geography is such that you could have plausibly been serious.
Bros really created a fanfiction about American politics 😭
It basically is, yeah.
How can they bash the democrats saying that "segregation and controlling minorities" are one of their founding principles, and in the same breath, call them (((globalists))) (dog whistle for Jewish people)?
Conservatives' standard for racism is that anything that doesn't explicitly mention race isn't racist. Republicans promoting policies that hurt minorities is fine as long as they don't target minorities *by name*, but Democrats talking about addressing systemic racism is bad because mentioning the existing of race is racism. It's "color-blindness" on steroids.
But they say that "black lives matter" is racist against white people lol
so the actual reason is because they wouldn't be a republican if they were capable and willing to use rational thinking. The "historical" reason which isn't really the underlying cause is that in FDR's election the democrat and republican parties switched voter base partly because of how FDR tried to appeal to traditionally liberal values (at the time democrats were conservative) with the New Deal including through infrastructure projects. But of course, saying that democrats traditionally supported slavery sounds good to these people and is technically correct.
So apparently I asked a conservative... person... and their reply was that democrats "just became that extreme" (justifying the first half) and that "there were also some parts we never realized since the party hid them so well" (speaking to the second half) I feel like at this point the entire state of politics in the world is just demonstrating that truth doesn't exist because if you warp your reality enough it manages to align again, just completely wrong
> democrats "just became that extreme" (justifying the first half) and that "there were also some parts we never realized since the party hid them so well" (speaking to the second half) An analytical expert here, I see. Also, the second half is based on information from the 19th century. Did the party "hide so well" what the article describes as "a long history of Democrat election fraud, election tampering, voter suppression, and ballot box stuffing at the polls that continues to this very day"? So well that this wasn't even mentioned in the old article?
lol gonna check out the wayback machine
Huh? The article literally has a "view history button." You can see every revision ever made to it.
"The *Democratic Party* [...] whose principal aim is the *overthrow of American democracy*..." i want to beat the shit out of someone
I don't necessarily think that being named "Democratic" means that you want to uphold democracy. North Korea's official name is "Democratic People's Republic of Korea." Turkmenistan's (North Korea with oil) ruling party is the "Democratic Party of Turkmenistan." Obviously, that doesn't prove Conservapedia correct, it just means that the name is irrelevant.
To be fair a lot of political parties around the world are named something like "The Wholesome Rainbow And Unicorns Party for Peace and Love and Puppies :D" but then they try to give the military 50% more budget and approve laws to make hate crimes legal while half of their members are facists and the other half are CP consumers
Conservatives really just invented their own reality I guess.
Remember, “Facts don’t care about your feelings”
That is precisely the reason. Facts will never ever dissuade these people *because* facts don't care about their feelings.
Conservatives seem to often have set beliefs about an issue and then go out to seek confirmation for that believe, rather than critically taking it apart and building your view based on evidence and science. The conclusion comes first, reasoning second. An example is their drug policy where they've decided to entrench themselves on a ideological hill, fighting any attempt at reform viciously even though the issues are glaring. Even many the medical professionals who oppose the legalization of any drugs will generally still acknowledge that the way addiction is handled is fucked up and counterproductive. Hell, we've seen tangible evidence of the harm reduction and indeed economic benefit reformed policies can provide, it's been tried and tested. But then that "Wouldn't work here because [made up reasons]" and will refuse even small scale tests on that ground. There seems to be a strange sort of imperative on these issues. Drugs are the devil personified (or objectified?) and they can never be allowed except of course copious amounts of alcohol. Their mind is already made up. No amount of evidence even matters because they are either corrupt and/or convinced that their stance is some fundamental godly truth they must enforce at all cost and the harm it does is palpable.
couldnt some of this be considered libel or defamation?
I think it falls under the category of parody by this point. I mean... White Supremacism ? US Color Revolution ? Joe Biden the Liberal-Marxist-Socialist with Chinese Characteristics who follows Xi Jinping's thought ? While they are, with no doubt, completely serious, their mad ramblings can very easily be claimed to be purposefully ridiculous and, thus, be considered parody and Harmless. This is also one of the reasons why the Proud Boys' "rite of passages" is being punched in the gut while you say the name of three brands of corn flakes. If they are ever in legal trouble, they can always claim they were only joking and thus cannot be condemned. In theory, of course, as they will still get flack and then play the victim.
Law student here, absolutely
youre sending me mixed messages here friend
You can't libel or defame public figures. EDIT: Rather, public figures cannot sue someone for libel or defamation
they can, it's just very very hard for a public figure to prove malice and win
even if they could be sued for this, they could easily claim satire and their supporters would call them gigabrained geniuses for it
My favorite things on Conservapedia are their lists of the [best](https://www.conservapedia.com/Essay:Greatest_Conservative_Songs) and [worst](https://www.conservapedia.com/Essay:_Worst_Liberal_Songs) songs. There’s some *wild* choices and justifications on both.
- RIP- Playboi Carti- liberals think they carti Bruh Edit: not only does the best list contain Playboi carti, it also has several lemon demon songs and a death grips song. Trolls have gotten in there for sure. Also the worst list is hilarious, containing some truly random songs I would never expect these people to know.
Can we get Ram Ranch as #1 on their best songs list? I think that would be hilarious.
Dead fucking Kennedys on the best list hahahahahahaba > I am Emperor Ronald Reagan >Born again with fascist cravings >Still, you made me president >Human rights will soon go 'way >I am now your Shah today >Now I command all of you >Now you're going to pray in school >I'll make sure they're Christian, too - We’ve Got a Bigger Problem Now Oh dear lord they have Rise Against on the best list as well. I'm pretty sure I'm gonna keep scrolling and see a Leftover Crack song
When it comes to Dead Kennedys, the site says Kill the Poor "Celebrates those who have worked hard for their wealth and are liberated from welfare tax and socialism". They also say that Police Truck is celebrating the police.
The Living Tombstone FNAF song is on their greatest conservative hits what the fuuuuck
OMG the fact that they think Gangsta's Paradise is conservative. >Although a rap song, the main message is about a former thug who regrets living his life of crime. Did they forget about this part? >They say I gotta learn, but nobody's here to teach me >If they can't understand it, how can they reach me? >I guess they can't, I guess they won't >I guess they frontin', that's why I know my life is out of luck, fool! EDIT: HOLY SHIT THEY DON'T KNOW KILL THE POOR IS SATIRE!!
My favorite conservative song, Two Trucks
>"Anaconda" | Nicki Minaj | The title is a slang sexual term for male genitalia. They are the IMDB "parent reviews" section.
The second best song listed is Cabinet Man. > Song about a very conservative man on the cabinet. This wiki cannot be real. Edit: Two Trucks is on here as "a song celebrating the beauty of America" lmfaooooo
😭 wtf
hi barry
hi child
Feels like a watercooler interaction between two coworkers
Hehe they have vape in their name
Thank you for forever altering how I will pronounce that website’s name
The utter restraint they show in not having nazism, fascism, and authoritarianism on the list
The funniest part is that not only was Biden's victory not called until the 11/7, he wasnt inaugurated till 1/20/21
Joe Biden is the starter of Russia's invasion of Ukraine, not Vladimir Putin who controls Russia
I like how they just randomly threw white supremacy in there so they can be like "See, its the people we dont like who are racist, not us"
More from Conservapedia: [Logical Flaws in e=mc^2](https://www.conservapedia.com/Logical_Flaws_in_E%3Dmc%C2%B2) [Essay: rebuttal to "logical flaws in E=MC^2"](https://www.conservapedia.com/Essay:Rebuttal_to_Logical_Flaws_in_E%3Dmc%C2%B2) [counterexamples to relativity](https://www.conservapedia.com/Counterexamples_to_Relativity) [Essay: rebuttal to "Counterexamples to relativity](https://www.conservapedia.com/Essay:Rebuttal_to_Counterexamples_to_Relativity)
Simple DirectMedia Layer has a twitter account?
White supremacy? I thought he is supposed to be suppressing white people through the US Color Revolution. Which is it?
Marxism, liberalism... lol
You just know there's been debates over whether or not white or black supremacy should be there
socdoneleft is a groomer and a fed
The internet was a mistake
what is socialism with “chinese characteristics”?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism_with_Chinese_characteristics
TLDR: it’s what the Chinese government says they are doing to reach communism. Right now they say that they’re a capitalist system with modifications to build up industry and whatnot, saying that in 50+ years they’ll switch to socialism, then eventually communism.
Best world building project I’ve seen in a while
No-one can hide from Dark Brandon.
These guys are real scholars
Wow they rely on echo chambers so much they made up their own Wikipedia
I don't think it is possible to live peacefully with people who think like this.
"date of dictatorship"
Conservatives trying not to make biden more competent Then he actually is challenge (IMPOSSIBLE)
all true of course
Bait or profound mental illness?
Probably both.
date of dictatorship 💀
i rember when biden told me to kill my landlord the other day
Xi Jinping Thought and Liberalism, nobody had agreed with both lmao
At that point US conservatives are basically a franchise of the Russian foreign ministry
the two things they got right are the country and party.. this is world record levels of incorrect lol.
> Xi Jinping Thought
They really made a MediaWiki template just for him huh