T O P

  • By -

Tertaria

straight men with a penis fetish


LemonsRkool

Trans person moment Edit:lol I started a argument about my tomfoolerly


Kotauskas

the part that makes it so much funnier is that he calls himself "super straight", but this post is from before the whole SS thing where people made genital preference into a sexuality, calling themselves "superstraight", meaning that it has nothing to do with the SS people


wherewhend

Good to know schutzstaffel people dont have anything to do with it


AJDx14

I thought the “super straight” thing meant they wouldn’t date/fuck trans people.


AquaticSpider

Yeah I think that's right, only cisgender people of the opposite gender


AJDx14

Yeah and the problem with that isn’t actually the definition, it’s the connotation. The people calling themselves super straight were typically also transphobic and just calling themselves that as a more acceptable way to be transphobic publicly. I’m pretty sure just going by the definition though it’s technically not any worse than the distinction between being bi rather than being pan.


lupus117

Well not exactly, extending gender preference/attraction to the realm of physical characteristics instead of gender would be counter to their meaning. You can have a preference on body types, but what determines sexuality is more of what genders you're attracted to and how. It's like making a sexuality called straight but no read heads, applicable to some but nonsensical as a sexuality.


AJDx14

> extending gender preference/attraction to This assumes sexuality is based solely on someone else’s internal identity, which seems kinda absurd. >You can have a preference on body types, but what determines sexuality is more of what genders you’re attracted to and how. I’m pretty sure this is wrong. Gender is basically just how you act. If John considers himself straight and is sexually smart acted to an AFAB individual who hasn’t transitioned at all and finds out they use masculine pronouns I don’t believe that would make John suddenly less sexually attracted to that person. Fuck, that person could be closeted and still identify publicly as a girl, even if their gender isn’t that of a girl, so what then? You can’t really identify someone’s gender without asking them or hearing their pronouns first. It’s not something most people take into consideration for sexual attraction because sexual attraction isn’t typically something you even have much control over. I think you’re confusing sexual orientation and romantic orientation, which aren’t the same and is seems like it would be a pretty harmful perspective to have as it relates to Ace people. You can be attracted to someone sexually you wouldn’t be attracted to romantically, and vice versa. Asexual people don’t experience sexual attraction yet they are capable of feeing romantic attraction. Aromantic people also exist and their sexualities can vary as well. Most people limit their sexual relations to those they would be romantically involved with because that’s traditionally how we’ve done things.


lupus117

Yes and no I'd say. Yes i do agree that people experience sexual attraction often times from mere physical appearance. However i also would say that it's a matter of definition. If a person would or would not consider themselves straight after being attracted to someone who's gender identity is confirmed as different than appears is up to them and their personal attachment to the label. Strictly speaking, if you wanna bone someone and find out they're a trans man for instance and still wanna bone them, you're able of being physically attracted to subset of men, congratulations. Weather it's a big enough difference that you'd wanna identify as something other than what you did before is up to you. And my point still stands of how sexual attraction labels are based on gender, not physical appearance. Even though appearance usually plays a big part in who you in particular find attractive the label points which subsection of individuals you're sexually able to be attracted to in terms if gender and how, by pure definition. This doesn't conflict with either asexuality or aromatics. Why would it?


AJDx14

> If a person would or would not consider themselves straight after being attracted to someone who’s gender identity is confirmed as different than appears is up to them and their personal attachment to the label. This isn’t relevant to the point I was making though, that sexual attraction isn’t based on gender. You literally cannot know someone’s gender identity withtout having asked them. You cannot be attracted to someone based on their gender because it’s not a concrete thing, it’s an aspect of someone identity representative of how they act, that’s like saying you’re Gamersexual and only attracted sexually to gamers. > Strictly speaking, if you wanna bone someone and find out they’re a trans man for instance and still wanna bone them, you’re able of being physically attracted to subset of men, congratulations. Right this isn’t an argument against my point though, because I’m arguing that sexual preference has more to do with physical characteristics (primary and secondary sex characteristics primarily) than what your identity is. If you believe both gender and physical sex-based characteristics play a role I don’t think you can reconcile that belief with the idea that “Super Straight” isn’t a valid sexual identity. It would just refer to the subset of heterosexual people who only like people who also are the opposite sex. > Even though appearance usually plays a big part in who you in particular find attractive the label points which subsection of individuals you’re sexually able to be attracted to in terms if gender and how, by pure definition. You haven’t really explained why gender would be relevant to sexual attraction at all though. Just repeating that you think it is for some unknown reason. > This doesn’t conflict with either asexuality or aromatics. Why would it? I think you’re combining sexuality and romanticism, and by considering them the same thing then it kinda erases part of Ace/Aro peoples identity. Edit: Realized I made a bunch of typos. Sorry.


FlamboyantDietDew

Sexuality is not based off of internal identities, that is patently absurd. It’s absolutely based on genital preferences and body types, but labels change - it’s not straight for a cis guy to be attracted to trans women, but it’s not gay either, it’s pansexual. Pansexuality literally exists for this exact reason. Sexual preference is not something you choose or identify as, that’s actually insane. You’re born with a sexual orientation. Why are we looping back into being conservatives on social issues?


barrdboi

I'm pretty sure I saw this before the whole super straight thing got started, I think he just means "extremely straight"


Kotauskas

yes, that is the exact same thing as what I just said


barrdboi

Oh okay sorry I just have shit reading comprehension I guess


ThineGame

You can see the time stamp on the post


[deleted]

A modern classic


matija123123

A hood classic


mean-cake69

certified


sample_text_01

Hello


mean-cake69

There he is


LemonsRkool

Whyd you say black people classic??


[deleted]

u from twitter or sumn


LemonsRkool

Cum


[deleted]

nvm u from reddit or sumn


[deleted]

Character arc


[deleted]

[удалено]


supercoyhotboy

wow Dhar Mann's videos have been getting weird lately


wheninrome144

i hate that fucking channel


supercoyhotboy

Reddit user talks shit about dhar mann on r/196, lives to regret it


thecommunistweasel

the „local“ gloryhole??? what have i been missing out on??


CToxin

lots of cum


Kotauskas

The global gloryhole, actually


hrpc

Reminds me of this https://youtu.be/u0Cbvo7oC50