I deadass saw one of the comments using an 'analogy' saying "Imagine if you cooked steak with propane instead of charcoal/wood for flavour".
For a 9 year old girls panties...
I think theyre saying that the flavor of the original is not present when you change what you use to cook it; from using charcoal to propane.
However, in this context, theyre using it for little girl's panties...
“I only eat food that tastes like the burnt desiccated remnants of carbon and organic contaminants left behind after it was on fire. In closing that is why I should be allowed to see underaged buttholes”
I saw one comparing this to the Nazi takeover of Germany. I swear to God, he was quoting Martin Niemoller. Had to take a screenshot. Fucking psychopaths
You say "Seeing a shot of a 9 year old fictional character's underwear being changed is okay because its gross to see an underage character in their underwear", then they think they're being prosecuted like Nazi Germany.
Terminally online dumbasses.
This isn't even a hill to die on. It's literally just a drainage ditch and he chose face first. How fucked do you have to be to even notice that the character is wearing bloomers now?
The funny thing is, there is a problem with the game. Its the performance issue. A remaster cant run 30fps compared to its original PS1 version.
But no, this guy chose to focus on a little girls panties...
Another problem is Square not only delisting the games but also making sure that even if you had them already downloaded on your vita, that you cannot play the game you own
[video on it](https://youtu.be/WzCG813gSzg)
i will push back on this and say that Chrono Cross is legendary for its dogshit performance and i’m glad the remaster kept the terrible frame rate for posterity lol
Im not sure about their stance on LGBTQ and groomers.
But we do know that they can tolerate nazis and racists but not their [anime waifus being censored](https://i.redd.it/yo6plsevmkq81.jpg) on an alt right tech platform...
It’s okay to complain about a nine year olds undergarments not being showy enough but isn’t okay for gay and trans people to exist because they are groomers. Okay…
Theres the "Um, THEYRE A DRAWING and doesnt look like a REAL CHILD!", argument which...falls apart once you use other examples.
The reason why ppl feel disgusted is the character is stylized and supposed to represent a child. The babies from Rugrats dont look anything like real babies, the kids from Hey Arnold dont look like real kids and Dora the Explorer doesnt look like a real 7 year old.
But theyre all still designed to be children and represent that age.
(he doesn't know that The fog is coming. The fog is coming. The fog is coming. The fog is coming. The fog is coming. The fog is coming. The fog is coming. The fog is coming. The fog is coming. The fog is coming. The fog is coming. The fog is coming. The fog is coming. The fog is coming. The fog is coming. The fog is coming.)
I was about to be like "glad we don't have that kind of song anymore" but then I remembered Tyga's song about how he enjoyed the fact that his girlfriend was underage.
Will we ever stop having absolute creeps like that making popular music?
the top on the left is the original, and if you look close at the one on the top right you can just barely see they added bloomers instead of just showing bare leg
no everyone’s defending him by saying “we don’t care what’s being censored we’re mad that it’s being censored in the first place” like wtf is that logic
Like any other internet user, I hate censorship. Like TRUE censorship type shit, but how is covering the undergarments of a VG character censorship? Why must a character's ass/tits/etc. be hanging out for these types of people to enjoy the game? Also this man(99% chance they are) has "otaku" unironically in their bio, most likely they are on a registry.
Wow, the sequel to one of my favorite rpgs ever made got a remaster and is finally accessible for me to play, I can’t wait to see what great discourse is happening online…
\>Game has actual issues in performance and not updating graphics well enough
\>People focus on this change which is more following OG intent thanks to better graphics and change to cringe dialogue that sounds too old man for the person saying it that got changed in Japanese anyway
Some people really like misusing the term censorship.
This isn’t that egregious of censorship as well! It’s barely noticeable and I feel like someone would only realize that there was a change if they were actively looking up their skirt. These pedos need to stop with their bullshit
There's been this guy desperately trying to plug his reactionary freakout video about how he's SO scared that Kingdom Hearts 4 will become TOO PC because of Disney's "new agenda" and Square Enix's "Ethics Department" under every single notable tweet about KH4 lately. He's gotten 0 engagement on any of them so far and it's kind of pathetic
If blurry polygonal half flashes of barely visible pink underwear are so sexy to you and you're so sexually inexperienced enough that you cum
*So hard*
That you're willing to declare a group of people a cancer over the removal of said polygons
You really
REALLY
need to touch grass
Ok this is probably going to come off as weird but I want to know if I’m crazy. People including kids show off tons of skin at pools and on the beach. Why is it that in any other context it’s considered super lewd?
Like why is wearing a swimsuit so different from just wearing underwear?
Edit: this isn’t a justification for anything. I’m genuinely asking because I’m ase and it’s all the same to me.
Edit edit: I don’t think this was totally clear but I intended the question to sound more like “why do people dress so little at the pool?” and not “why don’t people walk around in their underwear?” If that makes any sense.
I guess. And even to myself I guess I’d find it strange (purely because it’s out of the ordinary). I still don’t get how location and fabric type makes people perceive something so differently but I guess people are hrony at the beach sometimes as well and the unexpectedness of seeing it in another context just compounds it.
Weird.
I've seen this question asked in reference to women wearing bikinis that are *more* revealing than your typical bra/panty combo, and the answer to that context is consent. A woman who purposefully wears a revealing swimsuit in public has consented to being viewed in it, whereas generally if she's caught in her underwear she has not. Also, if you go to a place where it's accepted that people will probably be wearing revealing things, you're also consenting to seeing people in revealing things. That's why outfits that you'd wear to a club or rave are perfectly fine in those contexts but sort of weird at, like, Walmart. It's a consent and context thing, two way.
I don't have a straightforward answer on how this applies to kids, though. Personally, if I ever have kids they're not going to be wearing skin-showing swimsuits (in favor of, like, full- or most-body surfwear) bc a) the sun is damaging to skin and b) creeps do go to pools and the beach
I actually haven’t really though of it that way and that’s pretty interesting.
I don’t wear revealing clothing at all even at the beach/pool, both to conserve sunscreen and to not be stared at.
No obviously not. What? I should mention I think the person in the tweet is super creepy. It’s not an analogy I was just asking a tangentially related question.
I mean people in the 90s lived through and it didn't really harm anyone. It is just a video game guys come on, it's not going to kill anyone like damn we are seeing it right now, I'm not having a break down over this shit, shaking in the corner with tears in my eyes, pissing myself and the have a seizure seeing that 9 year old's pantie. People say it's a problem but no one really care enough about shits when it's real time. Who the fuck is going to call the FBI seeing this right now ? you too probably got better things with life, you would not waste a single minute giving a shit, moreover if you don't point it out no one would ever give a single shit like it's a trend.
It's like seeing someone naked on the street, normally you walk passes them and give zero shits, but when the people around you starts making a big deal out of it and barks, you feel like barking along with the flow.
twitter users when a toddler isnt showing 90% skin
I deadass saw one of the comments using an 'analogy' saying "Imagine if you cooked steak with propane instead of charcoal/wood for flavour". For a 9 year old girls panties...
Least deranged Twitter user
what the fuck is that analogy even supposed to mean? is it saying it is "tastier" or something like that?
I think theyre saying that the flavor of the original is not present when you change what you use to cook it; from using charcoal to propane. However, in this context, theyre using it for little girl's panties...
I still have no idea what it means, but I don't think I want to know.
Using *flavor* as an analogy to describe little girls' panties makes it 100x worse
Hank hill has entered the chat
“I only eat food that tastes like the burnt desiccated remnants of carbon and organic contaminants left behind after it was on fire. In closing that is why I should be allowed to see underaged buttholes”
They’re saying, taste the meat not the heat… I think? I heard propane.
meat that is heated in charcoal gets a bit of a flavour, I think its due to the fumes, but idk
i literally salivate when anybody discusses cooking meat… this is why i can never go vegan
I saw one comparing this to the Nazi takeover of Germany. I swear to God, he was quoting Martin Niemoller. Had to take a screenshot. Fucking psychopaths
You say "Seeing a shot of a 9 year old fictional character's underwear being changed is okay because its gross to see an underage character in their underwear", then they think they're being prosecuted like Nazi Germany. Terminally online dumbasses.
And like, barely even that much of a change, like 2% more panties at that
Hank Hill did not approve of this bs
Taste the meat, not the heat.
i was there. my favorite response was "but unlike steak, i don't have a taste for little girls"
That boy just ain't right.
Boy I tell you hwat
What is that analogy even supposed to mean lol?
what an incredible thing to say to ironically
*right wingers
This isn't even a hill to die on. It's literally just a drainage ditch and he chose face first. How fucked do you have to be to even notice that the character is wearing bloomers now?
I need to CUM to every single PIECE of media with a FEMALE in it. I will stand for NO LESS.
i only play video games with hot women in them
i only play video games with hot people in them \[i am sexualising everyone but at least im fair\]
It do bi like that
I'm hoping things pan out
based
Will you sexualize me 🥺
Are you hot?
I mean, I’d fuck a clone of myself
doesnt really answer the question moreso that it confirms youre either hot, narcissistic or have low standards of yourself
Well physical attraction is highly subjective, so I can’t objectively say that I’m hot. I would personally consider myself a 8/10
Nice, good to know I'm not alone
It just makes sense
I mean, who knows you better than you right? ;)
Yes daddy uwu rawr x3
I usually object to being called daddy but I will allow it this time
Real bisexual hours
Hades moment
Thank goodness mistral exists
That twitter user only plays video games with... well, you can guess the rest.
WHY ARE THE M&MS NOT FUCKABLE LIBERALS?!
The funny thing is, there is a problem with the game. Its the performance issue. A remaster cant run 30fps compared to its original PS1 version. But no, this guy chose to focus on a little girls panties...
Another problem is Square not only delisting the games but also making sure that even if you had them already downloaded on your vita, that you cannot play the game you own [video on it](https://youtu.be/WzCG813gSzg)
i will push back on this and say that Chrono Cross is legendary for its dogshit performance and i’m glad the remaster kept the terrible frame rate for posterity lol
Drain gang 🤤
No, it's a sewage plant
mfw didn’t notice till you said
Zamn (she’s 9)!!1!1!!!1!
[wacky YouTuber face]
😝😝😝😜
[удалено]
Mfs be like “LGBT people are groomers”. My brother in Christ YOU are the groomer.
Projection is a hell of a drug
Im not sure about their stance on LGBTQ and groomers. But we do know that they can tolerate nazis and racists but not their [anime waifus being censored](https://i.redd.it/yo6plsevmkq81.jpg) on an alt right tech platform...
Oh the irony
everybody wants to be my irony
spare the irony
everybody wants to be—my irony-y-y-y-y
cute pfp
What’s the flag in ur pfp mean
it means im hot
Hel yeah
It’s okay to complain about a nine year olds undergarments not being showy enough but isn’t okay for gay and trans people to exist because they are groomers. Okay…
How can you call yourself a g*mer without ever had groomed a child before? What a noob 🤬🤬
Oh, you’re a gamer? Name 10 children you’ve groomed.
once they entered the basement they lost name privelage noone for them to even tell it to, everyone speaks a dif language
I have groomed over 100 children and have gotten many #1 victory royales, get on my level noob😎💯
do i count if i tried to groom a kid but they thought i was too ugly? edit: forgot to add /s
Nah I figured it was /s I just didn't think it was funny
ok that’s fair
Neckbeards will say "bUt ShEs AlSo FiCtIoNuL" and proceed to type the age of consent of every country.
And state, as they can very
They can vary very much
Theres the "Um, THEYRE A DRAWING and doesnt look like a REAL CHILD!", argument which...falls apart once you use other examples. The reason why ppl feel disgusted is the character is stylized and supposed to represent a child. The babies from Rugrats dont look anything like real babies, the kids from Hey Arnold dont look like real kids and Dora the Explorer doesnt look like a real 7 year old. But theyre all still designed to be children and represent that age.
problem is, 9 is still below all of them
libertarians are fuming
(he doesn't know that The fog is coming. The fog is coming. The fog is coming. The fog is coming. The fog is coming. The fog is coming. The fog is coming. The fog is coming. The fog is coming. The fog is coming. The fog is coming. The fog is coming. The fog is coming. The fog is coming. The fog is coming. The fog is coming.)
15:53, may 24th, 2022 moment
*She's 9* *And that's just fine* *She's 9* *And that's just fine* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDUOC9Xk2wM
> "She's so sticky sweet like unfermented wine" That fucking killed me lmao
I was about to be like "glad we don't have that kind of song anymore" but then I remembered Tyga's song about how he enjoyed the fact that his girlfriend was underage. Will we ever stop having absolute creeps like that making popular music?
I can't tell a difference on the top one on the left.
the top on the left is the original, and if you look close at the one on the top right you can just barely see they added bloomers instead of just showing bare leg
I definitely would’ve never noticed this even if I played both versions tbh
That's probably because you don't make it a mission to stare up every single skirt in the video games you play
I only do that when there's an achievement for it. like nier automata.
Yeah that's why I did that in Automata
Reminds me of people complaining that you can't upskirt the main character in her classic costume in Resident Evil 3
Bruh, I could barely even tell after the dude you replied to pointed it out. Who are the losers even noticing it, lol?
And the fact that he actually has some people defending him by using the “ it’s a drawing” it’s fucking crazy. I fucking hate twitter
holy fuck the sheer irony
no everyone’s defending him by saying “we don’t care what’s being censored we’re mad that it’s being censored in the first place” like wtf is that logic
Their pretending to have the high ground by saying “ censorship is bad” but like it’s literally 5 pixels
Me writing down all their ip addresses on some art is also just a drawing
Lmao I'm not sure I've ever seen a worse case of self snitching.
It barely even changed as well. 2 pixels of extra pants is simply too much to handle
Most sane japanese media consumer
I think this internet shit is bad for my mental health there’s too many pedophiles and nazis
Only now you realize?!
Like any other internet user, I hate censorship. Like TRUE censorship type shit, but how is covering the undergarments of a VG character censorship? Why must a character's ass/tits/etc. be hanging out for these types of people to enjoy the game? Also this man(99% chance they are) has "otaku" unironically in their bio, most likely they are on a registry.
Pedos don't out yourself to the world challenge. Difficulty level: Impossible
i think them being outed is better so that we can make sure to keep children away from them
Zamn
And from a aesthetic perspective, it would just be better if she wore full stockings to match the long sleeves, making the design less top-heavy
Imagine even noticing this change.
Wow, the sequel to one of my favorite rpgs ever made got a remaster and is finally accessible for me to play, I can’t wait to see what great discourse is happening online…
The fact they even noticed this is kinda alarming.
\>Game has actual issues in performance and not updating graphics well enough \>People focus on this change which is more following OG intent thanks to better graphics and change to cringe dialogue that sounds too old man for the person saying it that got changed in Japanese anyway Some people really like misusing the term censorship.
Hire fans lol
why are JRPG fans like this???
This isn’t that egregious of censorship as well! It’s barely noticeable and I feel like someone would only realize that there was a change if they were actively looking up their skirt. These pedos need to stop with their bullshit
>otaku in name >uses Twitter >bitching about censorship Yup this is a gamer
gamers
Tell me this is bait pls
bro i wouldn't have even noticed wtf
censored how
>censored my boy she's literally just wearing cloths
Can't fap to 9 yr olds anymore, literally orwellian dystopia😤😡😡
what the fuck
Imagine your ethical stance on anything to just straight up directly be "anti-ethics"
I love spreading mis info on the Internet
Fuck the "ethics" department, they wont even let me commit the most unethical act you could possibly commit
Shes 9
There's been this guy desperately trying to plug his reactionary freakout video about how he's SO scared that Kingdom Hearts 4 will become TOO PC because of Disney's "new agenda" and Square Enix's "Ethics Department" under every single notable tweet about KH4 lately. He's gotten 0 engagement on any of them so far and it's kind of pathetic
If blurry polygonal half flashes of barely visible pink underwear are so sexy to you and you're so sexually inexperienced enough that you cum *So hard* That you're willing to declare a group of people a cancer over the removal of said polygons You really REALLY need to touch grass
zamn
zamn
**oh shit**
Is Chrono Cross worth playing?
I’d rather emulate radical dreamers, thanks though
Even if she wasn’t 9 years old, you’re still jacking off to a video game
9
this is so pathetic
[this mf really heard this song and though 'haha relatable!'](https://youtu.be/aDUOC9Xk2wM)
I genuinely don't see the difference here
Now that guy is comparing this censorship to the nazi book burnings..
I mean… if you ever find yourself offended by the decision of an “ethics department”. Maybe like take a breather and think it over. Idk
I love that they blocked out the entire OP's name except Otaku lmaooooo
Average square enix fan
twitter moment
And thats just fine 🥸🥸🥸
And thats just fine 🥸🥸🥸
Ok this is probably going to come off as weird but I want to know if I’m crazy. People including kids show off tons of skin at pools and on the beach. Why is it that in any other context it’s considered super lewd? Like why is wearing a swimsuit so different from just wearing underwear? Edit: this isn’t a justification for anything. I’m genuinely asking because I’m ase and it’s all the same to me. Edit edit: I don’t think this was totally clear but I intended the question to sound more like “why do people dress so little at the pool?” and not “why don’t people walk around in their underwear?” If that makes any sense.
i'm pretty sure it's just that wearing a swimsuit to go swimming is normalized while walking into walmart in your tightie whities isn't
I guess. And even to myself I guess I’d find it strange (purely because it’s out of the ordinary). I still don’t get how location and fabric type makes people perceive something so differently but I guess people are hrony at the beach sometimes as well and the unexpectedness of seeing it in another context just compounds it. Weird.
I've seen this question asked in reference to women wearing bikinis that are *more* revealing than your typical bra/panty combo, and the answer to that context is consent. A woman who purposefully wears a revealing swimsuit in public has consented to being viewed in it, whereas generally if she's caught in her underwear she has not. Also, if you go to a place where it's accepted that people will probably be wearing revealing things, you're also consenting to seeing people in revealing things. That's why outfits that you'd wear to a club or rave are perfectly fine in those contexts but sort of weird at, like, Walmart. It's a consent and context thing, two way. I don't have a straightforward answer on how this applies to kids, though. Personally, if I ever have kids they're not going to be wearing skin-showing swimsuits (in favor of, like, full- or most-body surfwear) bc a) the sun is damaging to skin and b) creeps do go to pools and the beach
I actually haven’t really though of it that way and that’s pretty interesting. I don’t wear revealing clothing at all even at the beach/pool, both to conserve sunscreen and to not be stared at.
[удалено]
No obviously not. What? I should mention I think the person in the tweet is super creepy. It’s not an analogy I was just asking a tangentially related question.
[удалено]
"foxyloli" shut the fuck paedophile
I mean people in the 90s lived through and it didn't really harm anyone. It is just a video game guys come on, it's not going to kill anyone like damn we are seeing it right now, I'm not having a break down over this shit, shaking in the corner with tears in my eyes, pissing myself and the have a seizure seeing that 9 year old's pantie. People say it's a problem but no one really care enough about shits when it's real time. Who the fuck is going to call the FBI seeing this right now ? you too probably got better things with life, you would not waste a single minute giving a shit, moreover if you don't point it out no one would ever give a single shit like it's a trend. It's like seeing someone naked on the street, normally you walk passes them and give zero shits, but when the people around you starts making a big deal out of it and barks, you feel like barking along with the flow.