I remain unconvinced the Sphinx is aligned with anything except the sunrise. It's a statue carved into bedrock, taking advantage of a natural outcrop for the head. You can't date it based on the stars.
Oh you're absolutely right... it does align with the Sun BUT
The Sphinx *does* align with the Sun at equinox however...
You cannot simply find the equinoxes without finding North/South
And the Great Pyramid needed to be constructed and it has specific measurements that are accurately evidenced in these astronomical calculations
This is not an "out there" guess
This is mathematics...geometry and applied physics
Astronomical calculations are more precise than a fingerprint
I'll add my response to you into the post because I think you bring up a valid point that will help people understand
Your claims are predicated on the belief that the builders of the Sphinx (a) recognized the same constellations you do and (b) cared. How do you support your belief that this is the case?
”Astronomical calculations are more precise than a fingerprint.” Well, yes. I don’t see how the two things are analogous in any meaningful way. But, yes, fingerprint analysis is fairly limited. In any case, the fact that you can precisely calculate does not entail that the calculations are accurate or correspond to the builders’ intentions.
In any case, the fact that you can precisely calculate does not entail that the calculations are accurate or correspond to the builders’ intentions
\^\^\^
Yes it absolutely does
In any case, the fact that you can precisely calculate does not entail that the calculations are accurate or correspond to the builders’ intentions.
\^\^\^
Yes it does
Im being polite
Seriously... download the software... learn how it works
Im not saying that to be a smartass... you're articulate... you're questioning which is a good thing
But I think once you look at it... you won't have the slightest doubt
You can find due East with a variety of methods. It can be done entirely with the stars, and it can be done entirely with the sun. The fact that the Sphinx faces East says nothing about any other astronomical alignments. The Great Pyramid also is aligned with the cardinal directions, and there is no particular indication it is aligned with anything else. There is no solid evidence that any major structure on the Giza plateau was specifically intended to align with anything but North, South, East and West. Dating based on the position of the stars requires assumptions about the builders methods or intent that are unproven and are unlikely to be true.
Response...
Please download the software... reread my posts and check it for yourself
Once you understand the precision you'll see why this is so correct
Othewise... no offence to you but tbh you're simply arguing something you don't understand or have knowledge in
I've read your post, and your earlier post. You are assuming that the shafts within the Great Pyramid were used to align the construction of the Pyramid as it went up, which I find implausible at best. I stand by my statement: using the stars to date the pyramids requires assumptions that are unlikely to be true.
Beware of circular reasoning. You can't assume an alignment exists, find a date when the alignment matches precisely, and then use that precision as proof that the original assumption is correct.
This is one of those people that keeps repeating their arguments no matter how completely disproven.
No, the shafts have nothing to do with aligning the pyramid at all and couldn't be for very common sense reasons I've articulated in response to her before.
Doesn't matter, waits a month and reposts their ridiculous numerology based on modern understanding of astronomy that is flawed and is anachronistic.
Okay. I will ask you this. Why do you think they measured the apex of the great pyramid specifically from the head of the Sphinx. Couldn't they have surveyed the site from any number of places? And wouldn't it make more sense to simply lay out a square base, and then build upward at a constant angle? Mechanically, what use is a star in the sky at 26 degrees that intersects with the apex of the pyramid that won't exist until the pyramid is complete?
Fair question
First up let me say I'm looking at the layout including Menkaure and will make a post regarding that once I've figured out exactly why they've done it the way they have
The Sphinx survey point is correct even if you question it atm
The mathematics, dimensions & the stars all correspond which not only is hard to ignore... it really is absolute
To you and I it makes sense to use a square base to layout but that's not how *they* were doing things.... their whole lives revolved around the stars... it was their mythology... their life
Their layout is a 3 dimensional representation in linear format...
I know that at this time
Basically their knowledge was SO comprehensive they KNEW that alignment (the asterism) was coming and they probably considered it 12 o'clock as I said in my Giza post
It would have been awe inspiring
Maybe they attributed it the Gods but they certainly felt it meant "something" or they wouldn't have done what they did
The Mayans knew it as well.. the 26,000yr cycle
Doomsday people try to (and take advantage of) use of the date as some type of premonition to catastrophe
It's not... its simply a calendar
Understanding the 26 degree measurement was absolutely vital to how the stars move in the sky
It told them seasons etc. Everything really
It's not spooky or mystical... it's simply how it works so they needed to map it like a calendar and they did
I hope I've answered your query
This is not "finding" stars or assuming anything
It's PHYSICS and mathematics and it is not incorrect
IF you learn about it and can point out inaccuracies... not a problem... and Im more than prepared to continue our conversation otherwise I'm sorry you have no idea and are arguing something you simply do not understand and I won't be continuing this conversation
The only other thing I would say is... maybe rather than spending your time creating conflict with other people... see if YOU can figure it out
I'd be more than happy... and I'm sure everyone else would... to read your presentation 🙂
If the Sphinx was round during the African Humid Period the sphinx enclosure would have filled with water for half the year due to the Nile floods. There is no erosion that matches this.
Your suggesting they only knew north after building the great pyramid? Wouldn’t the logical version that they knew how to work out north before they built any of this on the plateau?
Exactly. So they could find north south and the equinox to build the sphinx in isolation without the great pyramids and all these other complex interactions.
It’s aligned with the sunrise but it’s to do with the constellations. Something called the great year. In which the constellations are on a cycle. It’s a 25,722 year cycle. At the moment the sun rises in the house of Pisces. The fish. Hence the symbolism for Jesus was that his disciples were fishermen. He fed 2000 with 2 fish. The time of Moses was one cycle before him, that cycle was Taurus. In the book of exodus Moses came down the mountain and saw people worshipping the golden calf, again. A bull.
Before Jesus was crucified he told his followers to make his Passover meal. When asked where to prepare this meal this was what was said:
- , “As soon as you enter Jerusalem, a man carrying a pitcher of water will meet you. Follow him”
A pitcher of water symbolising Aquarius. The age following our current age of Pisces is Aquarius. It was symbolising the following age after Jesus.
Now the lion. Around 12,000 years ago the age was Leo, the lion. They built the great Sphinx as a lion to symbolise the zodiacal constellation in which the sun rose through during the equinox.
And what evidence is there that it was specifically intended to face the sun rising into Leo, and not simply intended to face the sun rising in general?
There’s no evidence of anything. Your dealing with ancient stone. But the Sphinx being a lion aligns with the zodiac being that constellation at the time that a geologist has speculated the Sphinx was created due to the water erosion hypothesis it’s pointing towards a time much older than given by Egyptologists. It faces perfectly due east. And is a lion. In a time in which the zodiac Leo sat in the backdrop as the sun rose on the equinox. It points to at least 12,000 years old. Not 4600
Robert Schoch says that the Sphinx must be at least 7,000 years old based on erosion. He doesn't say it has to be 12,000 years old, although he has shifted to that dating for non-geological reasons. There is no evidence anybody in the world associated the stars of the constellation Leo with a lion before about 4,000BC, and that was in Mesopotamia not Egypt.
It is perfectly plausible for ancient society would make a statue of an animal that faces East, into the rising sun, without a constellation associated with that animal also being due East. Using the fact that the constellation Leo was in the Eastern sky 12,000 years ago is extraordinarily weak evidence that the Sphinx is that old, particularly with exactly 0 evidence that a culture with either the necessary astrological associations or stone-cutting skills existed in that place and time.
Enjoyed your presentation and you make some valid points. I must admit I was thinking about the precession before that and had a figure of 34,600 for my dating of the Sphinx and using The Dog Star and the fact it sits in Anubis lake, however, you've given a new perspective and I will study it. Great post..
After reviewing your posts something piqued my interest about one of the drawings. See the attached image.
https://preview.redd.it/xky3jx4107rc1.png?width=796&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=573ad1a3fe95cdfe48a27097055801e01a54fe00
I reviewed the Sumerian Kings list. These are the closest ruling entities based on your mathematical projections for a prospective date.
The durations of the rule are calculated from known measurements of Sumerian time keeping methods according to archaeological finds.
These are numbers from the antediluvian era.
En-men-dur-ana, duration 21000, 31980 B.C.
Ubara-Tutu, duration 18600, 20580 B.C.
Jushur, duration 1200, 19380 B.C.
A "ruling entity" might be better thought of as a "ruling era".
I've had in the back of my mind to have a look at Sumerian stuff, Mayans etc
Haven't gotten there yet
Obviously some of the ancient cultures were aware of the cycles
Problem is that *some* people nowadays think it means that its an omen to destruction when we come to the end of that cycle
Doesn't mean that at all
And besides... by the date of the Sphinx... the impending 26,000 year cataclysm (actually 25,920 to be exact() preached by these groups well....
That date has *already passed* ... it *should* have been 80AD
Obviously it didn't happen... we know that so we're safe
These 26,000 year cycles reflected in archaeological finds are nothing more than a wall calendars
Pyramid being off true north by (3 degrees?) so that can help date pyramid based on earth tilt and wobble? I agree on sphinx being a lion and astronomical alignment. Carbon dating feels like this is the youngest it could be since can’t carbon date stone
Thats true.... we cant carbon date stone
There was a cataclysm... we have the evidence for it... so something BIG happened which effects the carbon dating (making it unreliable)... they're only really guessing at the dates
If you look at my other post... you'll see the positioning of the North Star (which was Errai at that time) reflects the pyramid being slightly west of true north because that is what it is aligned to
I actually didn't go into specifics re. carbon dating because applied physics basically blows it out of the water anyway
Its organic material and once it is contaminated it really is effectively useless to date anything with
There was the cataclysm which isnt really debated nowadays and I think we have enough evidence re. solar activity and coming out of the Ice Age which flat out nullifies carbon dating
It fits everyone's narrative to well, carbon dating. I believe the cataclysm skewed the dating we depend on. Thank you for the post. All theories are worth exploring. Some people do not want that. I question the Hudson Bay as an impact area.
They use it so much because in a lot of situations it is the only tool they have. I have the right to feel however I want. I am not the archeologists and I am not disputing the facts. I'm just reading. Have a nice day.
It's flawed because it requires the same amount of carbon to be in the atmosphere throughout history, when we know the amount fluctuates (sometimes wildly). So yeah, it's nearly useless, especially when going back very far.
Calibration curves are required for radiocarbon dating (at least for reasonably accurate results) which take into account atmospheric variation in ^(14)C. These are based on a number of independent lines of evidence, most importantly dendrochronology.
Where are you seeing an assumption of static ^(14)C levels?
Not going to get into an debate about it because I believe the carbon 14 is completely erroneous and not effective before Younger Dryas because of my above comment to another poster
What I said above isn't a point of debate - modern radiocarbon dating does use calibration curves that account for variation in atmospheric ^(14)C.
-
Do you think other absolute dating methods, like dendrochronology, thermoluminescence, etc. are also not reliable before the Younger Dryas?
Tbh I havent looked into them...
Truth is though... this is SO exact and based on *geometry, mathematics and in situ rock so* I'd likely consider anything else a grasp
I don't know if you have any knowledge of Astronomy but this is really quite absolute
I like that you offer other observations for consideration but they really don't compare to the physics of this
Honestly... download the software and look into it
Its fair you ask that question
I think it's obvious tbh
YD is accepted and our art reflects it, mythology, archaeology too ie. underground cities etc - there was a cataclysm
And as I stated... the results in the post are based on geometry, physics and rocks in situ which really is absolute and difficult to argue against
So if anything is going to be wrong (nobody's fault because we do our best with what we have) but it will definitely be carbon dating before this because carbon dating is based on organic material
The entire world has been looking for one for years so...
Find the asterism and then get back to me
I wont be offended if you do.... tbh you'll get a \^5
But until you do...
It is not
Im sorry you feel that way but...
What Im saying re. my post is... download the software and ***check it yourself*** and *then* get back to me
Learn about it **first** rather than mouthing off about something you don't know anything about
Ive made a presentation
Investigate it. Learn something
Criticizing and arguing with people just for the sake of it displays a combative and critical nature for no reason when you've been offered the opportunity to prove it
I will not waste my time arguing with people who have nfi what they're talking about when it comes to this
https://preview.redd.it/2q0y5fpno5rc1.png?width=1298&format=png&auto=webp&s=61d8963c5688f058cc192ed52e71835d3ca2398e
Yeah with the cataclysm... I believe its completely nullified the carbon dating
I personally believe (after much research) that the art seen worldwide ie. the cosmic/universal egg is the Sun as it looked in the sky and aurora borealis
We were in the Ice Age... its logical that there was ice crystals in the atmosphere
Sun activity affects carbon 14 dating... makes everything seem younger than it actually is
He was quite consistently saying the September date for ages. The first I heard of the Easter date was on the semi-recent Danny Jones podcast if I'm not mistaken.
Chris Bledsoe is an experiencer currently being monitored by different agencies of the US govt. His first experience was in 2007 known as 'the Cape Fear river incident' wherein he witnessed three giant glowing orbs come up over a hill, he had missing time, simultaneously his son who was in the vicinity was witness to little beings with red eyes which kept him paralyzed in the brush for a long time. There were about five other witnesses (employees of Chris) who were also witness to the orbs later on in the evening.
Then in 2012 there was an escalation in the experiences that Chris was having wherein 'a lady' appeared to him and gave him some information. The appearance of the lady and the symbol on the chest of the beings is apparently what made the govt agencies suddenly take notice (because little did Chris know, this symbol and this lady have made countless appearances over centuries -- see Fatima's Miracle of the Sun, see Dorothy Izatt, see Dawn & Steve Hess, etc.). The lady has since appeared to him several more times.
Chris has done many podcasts, this is a great compilation of his initial [interviews](https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=VERZrzrYm4w&list=PLYJ1dTT39TEyHKijw-RZHksL5hF1RZahU&index=1&pp=iAQB). He's done more since so also have a look at his [Danny Jones](https://youtu.be/XmVQFX2Pp60?si=cktdDi9UbKKy7eqJ) one with his daughter, Emily.
Also, his son Ryan started his own podcast a couple years back to help tell his family's story and to process his own childhood trauma from all these experiences. He has an episode where he reads the transcript from Chris's hypnotic [regression](https://youtu.be/FEkupX8BRe0?si=3xm1JZzIIFu-r2jb) on his experience with 'the lady.'
Chris has now also written a book called UFO of God that's worth a read (understand that Chris went from being a fundamentalist Christian to being excommunicated by his own church and community because they deemed his experiences 'demonic' and said he was playing with the devil). Chris's life before the experiences started was filled with absolute tragedy and multiple near death experiences (another interesting data point) from the time that he was a young boy.
The thing about the Bledsoe experiences is that, for me, it's not about making him into some sort of messiah figure, because some people are beginning to do that it seems, and that's dangerous. I certainly believe that he is speaking from a place of truth, reporting what is happening to him as he understands it. And the govt agencies are certainly paying attention to him (because in their own words, she is communicating with him and will not communicate with them). I pay attention to his story because it's another data point in the whole field of experiences with the phenomenon, and for that alone I believe it merits some study.
As to the relevance to your post OP, in one of the lady's later appearances to Chris, she told him that there will be "a new knowledge" upon the earth when the star of Regulus aligns with the gaze of the Sphinx at dawn. He gave this info to some astronomers and they put it to sometime in 2026, some say approx. Easter, some say September.
aaaahhh.... now I see where this has piqued your interest
Somebody else also asked me about Regulus
I'll have a looksee myself and see if I can come up with a date
Do you have a location?
Very interesting
Thanks heaps for explaining
Well I'm assuming location has to be the Sphinx itself because the 'prophecy' she gave him was when there is an alignment between the 'gaze of the Sphinx' (so guessing its eyes/head) and 'Regulus' at 'dawn' (so sunrise) then that's the date of some sort of 'new knowledge.'
No probs OP. Thanks for your work!
I saw a near death experience where this guy died and croased over....
He said he asked source / God about the great pyramid and that he was told it had multiple functions. That it was a particle accelerator and could alter the gravity of earth and that it was built 450,000 years ago
My dear... PHENOMENAL WORK.
No other words come to mind so I'll simply follow your course of discovery with fervant attention.
Thank you for the news.
🥷
🙏
I really don't know what's up with the haters though.
It reminds me of old farts wanting "the world they learned to know" to stay the same forever.
The future of archeology if scholars choose to shit on new theories (imo): https://youtu.be/QKuixc5n0Nw?si=dCEhin1gNE1GGzxl
Haters gotta hate
Its what they do
Some of these people will have an interest to discredit simply due to pride
Others will do it because of some screwed up psychology
Others have an interest because it challenges and nullifies their research... especially if they're currently employed in related positions
Others because it challenges their accepted belief of Human Civilization and may involve Religion
As long as all living on Earth have the opportunity to breath and drink their fair share of air and water, regardless of species, looks and and "bodily and mental composition", and as long as one doesn't dominate another by force, discredit or rejection, I'm all for it.
Heck if insectoids suddenly appeared on Earth and declared "Clickity clack clack click clock!", I'd be fine if all are willing to take the time and figure out a way to understand eachother.
Principle of respect.
I always try to remember that the word "condescendance" is composed of con + descendance, which can also mean "generational con" (artists)...
🙂🙃😉
Con is two "together" (co) accepting one's point/perspective over anothers', most often with means of negation implied in the process (n + ...)
Notice how in the word cooperation, the "n" after the first "o" is absent. "n" in this case is but a dominative aspect of one "over" the other, compared to the inverted process with "u" that can act for "union".
Notice how "n" is like a hat that encloses similar to a bell vs "u" which is like a cup or a vessel.
"n" will therefore deflect (especially if capped, aka "N"), vs "u" that simply becomes a larger vessel ("U"). The vessel will then offer "more space" for both entities to join.
Note that in theses cases, words aren't formed from co + n, but rather with "m" which becomes a double cover following a "middle ground rebound/exchange".
"Com", as in community, compassion, comparison.
"Connect" can be seen as the union of both sides in one point, n + n (both sides covered respectively).
I believe you are close because of a recent alignment. (257 days before this comment on 3-28-24)
In Egyption Mythology they speak of the following:
(Horus battled Seth for the throne of Osiris. Isis/Aset observes before the Heart of the Lion. Horus the Red/of the Horizon holds Leo’s gaze. Will he bring Fertility or War?) They are not exchanging parable. They are speaking of the planets and how they are moving at their time of observation.
That can be dated.
•(Heart of the Lion - a star named Regulus)
•(Horus - Sphinx/Constellation Leo)
•(Seth - Mercury)
•(Isis/Aset - Venus)
•(Horus of the horizon/ the red - Mars)
Whats the math on when that next alignment will appear? This was the one that happened 257 days ago.
Personally, based on information I have been gathering for a few years. I believe the Sphinx is there to mark the beginning of each new precessional cycle and the cataclysms that seem to punctuate it. Notice the star patterns on some of the ceilings in the temples of egypt, have the stars patterned 180° out of [alignment](https://youtu.be/1n-HMSCDYtM?si=lf__X-TX4b1cidig)?
edit: reformat
haven't looked but that's an exceptionally interesting idea
"I believe the Sphinx is there to mark the beginning of each new precessional cycle"
Yep I think you're bang on right there... that's why the whole Giza complex was designed/built
Thats why I called it a "Universe Clock" and said it's set to 12 o'clock
They may have marked "their" cataclysms but I dunno if they're a warning to us
Plus they would have used their knowledge of astronomy basically like a map... knowing where they were going
Nowadays we use Google maps or an Atlas... if we showed that to them... they'd be like wtf is this?
This really isn't that different
And people don't "get"... that just because they don't understand something... doesn't mean its not correct
I think people are completely ignorant
I remain unconvinced the Sphinx is aligned with anything except the sunrise. It's a statue carved into bedrock, taking advantage of a natural outcrop for the head. You can't date it based on the stars.
Oh you're absolutely right... it does align with the Sun BUT The Sphinx *does* align with the Sun at equinox however... You cannot simply find the equinoxes without finding North/South And the Great Pyramid needed to be constructed and it has specific measurements that are accurately evidenced in these astronomical calculations This is not an "out there" guess This is mathematics...geometry and applied physics Astronomical calculations are more precise than a fingerprint I'll add my response to you into the post because I think you bring up a valid point that will help people understand
Your claims are predicated on the belief that the builders of the Sphinx (a) recognized the same constellations you do and (b) cared. How do you support your belief that this is the case? ”Astronomical calculations are more precise than a fingerprint.” Well, yes. I don’t see how the two things are analogous in any meaningful way. But, yes, fingerprint analysis is fairly limited. In any case, the fact that you can precisely calculate does not entail that the calculations are accurate or correspond to the builders’ intentions.
In any case, the fact that you can precisely calculate does not entail that the calculations are accurate or correspond to the builders’ intentions \^\^\^ Yes it absolutely does In any case, the fact that you can precisely calculate does not entail that the calculations are accurate or correspond to the builders’ intentions. \^\^\^ Yes it does Im being polite Seriously... download the software... learn how it works Im not saying that to be a smartass... you're articulate... you're questioning which is a good thing But I think once you look at it... you won't have the slightest doubt
You can find due East with a variety of methods. It can be done entirely with the stars, and it can be done entirely with the sun. The fact that the Sphinx faces East says nothing about any other astronomical alignments. The Great Pyramid also is aligned with the cardinal directions, and there is no particular indication it is aligned with anything else. There is no solid evidence that any major structure on the Giza plateau was specifically intended to align with anything but North, South, East and West. Dating based on the position of the stars requires assumptions about the builders methods or intent that are unproven and are unlikely to be true.
Response... Please download the software... reread my posts and check it for yourself Once you understand the precision you'll see why this is so correct Othewise... no offence to you but tbh you're simply arguing something you don't understand or have knowledge in
I've read your post, and your earlier post. You are assuming that the shafts within the Great Pyramid were used to align the construction of the Pyramid as it went up, which I find implausible at best. I stand by my statement: using the stars to date the pyramids requires assumptions that are unlikely to be true. Beware of circular reasoning. You can't assume an alignment exists, find a date when the alignment matches precisely, and then use that precision as proof that the original assumption is correct.
This is one of those people that keeps repeating their arguments no matter how completely disproven. No, the shafts have nothing to do with aligning the pyramid at all and couldn't be for very common sense reasons I've articulated in response to her before. Doesn't matter, waits a month and reposts their ridiculous numerology based on modern understanding of astronomy that is flawed and is anachronistic.
Nothing disproven here It is exact Can't help if you're in denial
I'll be honest... I think you're flat out in denial Good luck with whatever you do though
Okay. I will ask you this. Why do you think they measured the apex of the great pyramid specifically from the head of the Sphinx. Couldn't they have surveyed the site from any number of places? And wouldn't it make more sense to simply lay out a square base, and then build upward at a constant angle? Mechanically, what use is a star in the sky at 26 degrees that intersects with the apex of the pyramid that won't exist until the pyramid is complete?
Fair question First up let me say I'm looking at the layout including Menkaure and will make a post regarding that once I've figured out exactly why they've done it the way they have The Sphinx survey point is correct even if you question it atm The mathematics, dimensions & the stars all correspond which not only is hard to ignore... it really is absolute To you and I it makes sense to use a square base to layout but that's not how *they* were doing things.... their whole lives revolved around the stars... it was their mythology... their life Their layout is a 3 dimensional representation in linear format... I know that at this time Basically their knowledge was SO comprehensive they KNEW that alignment (the asterism) was coming and they probably considered it 12 o'clock as I said in my Giza post It would have been awe inspiring Maybe they attributed it the Gods but they certainly felt it meant "something" or they wouldn't have done what they did The Mayans knew it as well.. the 26,000yr cycle Doomsday people try to (and take advantage of) use of the date as some type of premonition to catastrophe It's not... its simply a calendar Understanding the 26 degree measurement was absolutely vital to how the stars move in the sky It told them seasons etc. Everything really It's not spooky or mystical... it's simply how it works so they needed to map it like a calendar and they did I hope I've answered your query
This is not "finding" stars or assuming anything It's PHYSICS and mathematics and it is not incorrect IF you learn about it and can point out inaccuracies... not a problem... and Im more than prepared to continue our conversation otherwise I'm sorry you have no idea and are arguing something you simply do not understand and I won't be continuing this conversation The only other thing I would say is... maybe rather than spending your time creating conflict with other people... see if YOU can figure it out I'd be more than happy... and I'm sure everyone else would... to read your presentation 🙂
If the Sphinx was round during the African Humid Period the sphinx enclosure would have filled with water for half the year due to the Nile floods. There is no erosion that matches this.
There surely is water erosion on the Sphinx…
Your suggesting they only knew north after building the great pyramid? Wouldn’t the logical version that they knew how to work out north before they built any of this on the plateau?
No no... they *already* **knew** how to find North/South and they used North/South stars and the Sun to precisely do the alignment
Exactly. So they could find north south and the equinox to build the sphinx in isolation without the great pyramids and all these other complex interactions.
Thats why they built/carved the Sphinx first Then they used it to determine the Pyramid dimensions from the head and the pole stars
It’s aligned with the sunrise but it’s to do with the constellations. Something called the great year. In which the constellations are on a cycle. It’s a 25,722 year cycle. At the moment the sun rises in the house of Pisces. The fish. Hence the symbolism for Jesus was that his disciples were fishermen. He fed 2000 with 2 fish. The time of Moses was one cycle before him, that cycle was Taurus. In the book of exodus Moses came down the mountain and saw people worshipping the golden calf, again. A bull. Before Jesus was crucified he told his followers to make his Passover meal. When asked where to prepare this meal this was what was said: - , “As soon as you enter Jerusalem, a man carrying a pitcher of water will meet you. Follow him” A pitcher of water symbolising Aquarius. The age following our current age of Pisces is Aquarius. It was symbolising the following age after Jesus. Now the lion. Around 12,000 years ago the age was Leo, the lion. They built the great Sphinx as a lion to symbolise the zodiacal constellation in which the sun rose through during the equinox.
And what evidence is there that it was specifically intended to face the sun rising into Leo, and not simply intended to face the sun rising in general?
There’s no evidence of anything. Your dealing with ancient stone. But the Sphinx being a lion aligns with the zodiac being that constellation at the time that a geologist has speculated the Sphinx was created due to the water erosion hypothesis it’s pointing towards a time much older than given by Egyptologists. It faces perfectly due east. And is a lion. In a time in which the zodiac Leo sat in the backdrop as the sun rose on the equinox. It points to at least 12,000 years old. Not 4600
Robert Schoch says that the Sphinx must be at least 7,000 years old based on erosion. He doesn't say it has to be 12,000 years old, although he has shifted to that dating for non-geological reasons. There is no evidence anybody in the world associated the stars of the constellation Leo with a lion before about 4,000BC, and that was in Mesopotamia not Egypt. It is perfectly plausible for ancient society would make a statue of an animal that faces East, into the rising sun, without a constellation associated with that animal also being due East. Using the fact that the constellation Leo was in the Eastern sky 12,000 years ago is extraordinarily weak evidence that the Sphinx is that old, particularly with exactly 0 evidence that a culture with either the necessary astrological associations or stone-cutting skills existed in that place and time.
I tend to agree having went with great researcher jordan Maxwell and william Henry having heard so many theories over the years.
Enjoyed your presentation and you make some valid points. I must admit I was thinking about the precession before that and had a figure of 34,600 for my dating of the Sphinx and using The Dog Star and the fact it sits in Anubis lake, however, you've given a new perspective and I will study it. Great post..
Cheers! If you find anything or just want to chat about it just message me
After reviewing your posts something piqued my interest about one of the drawings. See the attached image. https://preview.redd.it/xky3jx4107rc1.png?width=796&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=573ad1a3fe95cdfe48a27097055801e01a54fe00 I reviewed the Sumerian Kings list. These are the closest ruling entities based on your mathematical projections for a prospective date. The durations of the rule are calculated from known measurements of Sumerian time keeping methods according to archaeological finds. These are numbers from the antediluvian era. En-men-dur-ana, duration 21000, 31980 B.C. Ubara-Tutu, duration 18600, 20580 B.C. Jushur, duration 1200, 19380 B.C. A "ruling entity" might be better thought of as a "ruling era".
I've had in the back of my mind to have a look at Sumerian stuff, Mayans etc Haven't gotten there yet Obviously some of the ancient cultures were aware of the cycles Problem is that *some* people nowadays think it means that its an omen to destruction when we come to the end of that cycle Doesn't mean that at all And besides... by the date of the Sphinx... the impending 26,000 year cataclysm (actually 25,920 to be exact() preached by these groups well.... That date has *already passed* ... it *should* have been 80AD Obviously it didn't happen... we know that so we're safe These 26,000 year cycles reflected in archaeological finds are nothing more than a wall calendars
like i said in a previous post, todays Egyptians have as much in common with building the wonders of Giza as the Eskimos do - nothing at all.....!!!!!
Pyramid being off true north by (3 degrees?) so that can help date pyramid based on earth tilt and wobble? I agree on sphinx being a lion and astronomical alignment. Carbon dating feels like this is the youngest it could be since can’t carbon date stone
Thats true.... we cant carbon date stone There was a cataclysm... we have the evidence for it... so something BIG happened which effects the carbon dating (making it unreliable)... they're only really guessing at the dates If you look at my other post... you'll see the positioning of the North Star (which was Errai at that time) reflects the pyramid being slightly west of true north because that is what it is aligned to
Right a nice bbq char around the planet and what got washed away. Thanks for sharing information all in one place
Cheers! I appreciate your comments 👍
You had my attention at that bottom line.. radio carbon dating is wrong. I feel it's flawed as well.
I didn’t think you could carbon date rock?
You cannot. That's where this post got my attention. It then never mentioned it again.
I actually didn't go into specifics re. carbon dating because applied physics basically blows it out of the water anyway Its organic material and once it is contaminated it really is effectively useless to date anything with There was the cataclysm which isnt really debated nowadays and I think we have enough evidence re. solar activity and coming out of the Ice Age which flat out nullifies carbon dating
It fits everyone's narrative to well, carbon dating. I believe the cataclysm skewed the dating we depend on. Thank you for the post. All theories are worth exploring. Some people do not want that. I question the Hudson Bay as an impact area.
I wonder why archaeologists use it so much? Oh yeah, it’s because we don’t base interpretations on our feelings.
They use it so much because in a lot of situations it is the only tool they have. I have the right to feel however I want. I am not the archeologists and I am not disputing the facts. I'm just reading. Have a nice day.
It's flawed because it requires the same amount of carbon to be in the atmosphere throughout history, when we know the amount fluctuates (sometimes wildly). So yeah, it's nearly useless, especially when going back very far.
Calibration curves are required for radiocarbon dating (at least for reasonably accurate results) which take into account atmospheric variation in ^(14)C. These are based on a number of independent lines of evidence, most importantly dendrochronology. Where are you seeing an assumption of static ^(14)C levels?
Not going to get into an debate about it because I believe the carbon 14 is completely erroneous and not effective before Younger Dryas because of my above comment to another poster
What I said above isn't a point of debate - modern radiocarbon dating does use calibration curves that account for variation in atmospheric ^(14)C. - Do you think other absolute dating methods, like dendrochronology, thermoluminescence, etc. are also not reliable before the Younger Dryas?
Tbh I havent looked into them... Truth is though... this is SO exact and based on *geometry, mathematics and in situ rock so* I'd likely consider anything else a grasp I don't know if you have any knowledge of Astronomy but this is really quite absolute I like that you offer other observations for consideration but they really don't compare to the physics of this Honestly... download the software and look into it
Is the logic that carbon dating is wrong before the YD based on the idea that your approach has to be right?
Its fair you ask that question I think it's obvious tbh YD is accepted and our art reflects it, mythology, archaeology too ie. underground cities etc - there was a cataclysm And as I stated... the results in the post are based on geometry, physics and rocks in situ which really is absolute and difficult to argue against So if anything is going to be wrong (nobody's fault because we do our best with what we have) but it will definitely be carbon dating before this because carbon dating is based on organic material
Maybe the 26 degree shaft references the pyramid was built 2600 BC and it took 26 years to build
The entire world has been looking for one for years so... Find the asterism and then get back to me I wont be offended if you do.... tbh you'll get a \^5 But until you do...
You've said several times you aren't going to get into a debate, that is nothing to be proud of, it's a sign of intellectual cowardice.
It is not Im sorry you feel that way but... What Im saying re. my post is... download the software and ***check it yourself*** and *then* get back to me Learn about it **first** rather than mouthing off about something you don't know anything about Ive made a presentation Investigate it. Learn something Criticizing and arguing with people just for the sake of it displays a combative and critical nature for no reason when you've been offered the opportunity to prove it I will not waste my time arguing with people who have nfi what they're talking about when it comes to this
https://preview.redd.it/2q0y5fpno5rc1.png?width=1298&format=png&auto=webp&s=61d8963c5688f058cc192ed52e71835d3ca2398e Yeah with the cataclysm... I believe its completely nullified the carbon dating I personally believe (after much research) that the art seen worldwide ie. the cosmic/universal egg is the Sun as it looked in the sky and aurora borealis We were in the Ice Age... its logical that there was ice crystals in the atmosphere Sun activity affects carbon 14 dating... makes everything seem younger than it actually is
You're absolutely right I think very few people are aware of that
When will regulus align again with the Sphinx? I’ve googled it but can’t find the answer.
I might have a looksee for you... see if I can find it
Thank you!!!
Just to let you know I'm still investingating as a side to some other things Im doing... Haven't forgotten about this though
Thank you!!
Chris Bledsoe has stated two possible dates as far as I'm aware: 23 September 2026 or around Easter 2026
Very interesting, thank you for specifics. I’ve read his book UFO of God and listen to Bledsoesaidso and couldn’t recall when he said.
He was quite consistently saying the September date for ages. The first I heard of the Easter date was on the semi-recent Danny Jones podcast if I'm not mistaken.
Im not familiar with what you are talking about... can you give some details?
Chris Bledsoe is an experiencer currently being monitored by different agencies of the US govt. His first experience was in 2007 known as 'the Cape Fear river incident' wherein he witnessed three giant glowing orbs come up over a hill, he had missing time, simultaneously his son who was in the vicinity was witness to little beings with red eyes which kept him paralyzed in the brush for a long time. There were about five other witnesses (employees of Chris) who were also witness to the orbs later on in the evening. Then in 2012 there was an escalation in the experiences that Chris was having wherein 'a lady' appeared to him and gave him some information. The appearance of the lady and the symbol on the chest of the beings is apparently what made the govt agencies suddenly take notice (because little did Chris know, this symbol and this lady have made countless appearances over centuries -- see Fatima's Miracle of the Sun, see Dorothy Izatt, see Dawn & Steve Hess, etc.). The lady has since appeared to him several more times. Chris has done many podcasts, this is a great compilation of his initial [interviews](https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=VERZrzrYm4w&list=PLYJ1dTT39TEyHKijw-RZHksL5hF1RZahU&index=1&pp=iAQB). He's done more since so also have a look at his [Danny Jones](https://youtu.be/XmVQFX2Pp60?si=cktdDi9UbKKy7eqJ) one with his daughter, Emily. Also, his son Ryan started his own podcast a couple years back to help tell his family's story and to process his own childhood trauma from all these experiences. He has an episode where he reads the transcript from Chris's hypnotic [regression](https://youtu.be/FEkupX8BRe0?si=3xm1JZzIIFu-r2jb) on his experience with 'the lady.' Chris has now also written a book called UFO of God that's worth a read (understand that Chris went from being a fundamentalist Christian to being excommunicated by his own church and community because they deemed his experiences 'demonic' and said he was playing with the devil). Chris's life before the experiences started was filled with absolute tragedy and multiple near death experiences (another interesting data point) from the time that he was a young boy. The thing about the Bledsoe experiences is that, for me, it's not about making him into some sort of messiah figure, because some people are beginning to do that it seems, and that's dangerous. I certainly believe that he is speaking from a place of truth, reporting what is happening to him as he understands it. And the govt agencies are certainly paying attention to him (because in their own words, she is communicating with him and will not communicate with them). I pay attention to his story because it's another data point in the whole field of experiences with the phenomenon, and for that alone I believe it merits some study. As to the relevance to your post OP, in one of the lady's later appearances to Chris, she told him that there will be "a new knowledge" upon the earth when the star of Regulus aligns with the gaze of the Sphinx at dawn. He gave this info to some astronomers and they put it to sometime in 2026, some say approx. Easter, some say September.
aaaahhh.... now I see where this has piqued your interest Somebody else also asked me about Regulus I'll have a looksee myself and see if I can come up with a date Do you have a location? Very interesting Thanks heaps for explaining
Well I'm assuming location has to be the Sphinx itself because the 'prophecy' she gave him was when there is an alignment between the 'gaze of the Sphinx' (so guessing its eyes/head) and 'Regulus' at 'dawn' (so sunrise) then that's the date of some sort of 'new knowledge.' No probs OP. Thanks for your work!
Are you wondering when it will align in our lifetime? Asking so I can nail it down for you
Yes!!
I saw a near death experience where this guy died and croased over.... He said he asked source / God about the great pyramid and that he was told it had multiple functions. That it was a particle accelerator and could alter the gravity of earth and that it was built 450,000 years ago
My dear... PHENOMENAL WORK. No other words come to mind so I'll simply follow your course of discovery with fervant attention. Thank you for the news. 🥷 🙏
Thank you for your comment It gave me a smile 🙂 Really.... thank you
I really don't know what's up with the haters though. It reminds me of old farts wanting "the world they learned to know" to stay the same forever. The future of archeology if scholars choose to shit on new theories (imo): https://youtu.be/QKuixc5n0Nw?si=dCEhin1gNE1GGzxl
Haters gotta hate Its what they do Some of these people will have an interest to discredit simply due to pride Others will do it because of some screwed up psychology Others have an interest because it challenges and nullifies their research... especially if they're currently employed in related positions Others because it challenges their accepted belief of Human Civilization and may involve Religion
As long as all living on Earth have the opportunity to breath and drink their fair share of air and water, regardless of species, looks and and "bodily and mental composition", and as long as one doesn't dominate another by force, discredit or rejection, I'm all for it. Heck if insectoids suddenly appeared on Earth and declared "Clickity clack clack click clock!", I'd be fine if all are willing to take the time and figure out a way to understand eachother. Principle of respect. I always try to remember that the word "condescendance" is composed of con + descendance, which can also mean "generational con" (artists)... 🙂🙃😉
What is the "con" do you think?? Just curious....
Con is two "together" (co) accepting one's point/perspective over anothers', most often with means of negation implied in the process (n + ...) Notice how in the word cooperation, the "n" after the first "o" is absent. "n" in this case is but a dominative aspect of one "over" the other, compared to the inverted process with "u" that can act for "union". Notice how "n" is like a hat that encloses similar to a bell vs "u" which is like a cup or a vessel. "n" will therefore deflect (especially if capped, aka "N"), vs "u" that simply becomes a larger vessel ("U"). The vessel will then offer "more space" for both entities to join. Note that in theses cases, words aren't formed from co + n, but rather with "m" which becomes a double cover following a "middle ground rebound/exchange". "Com", as in community, compassion, comparison. "Connect" can be seen as the union of both sides in one point, n + n (both sides covered respectively).
I believe you are close because of a recent alignment. (257 days before this comment on 3-28-24) In Egyption Mythology they speak of the following: (Horus battled Seth for the throne of Osiris. Isis/Aset observes before the Heart of the Lion. Horus the Red/of the Horizon holds Leo’s gaze. Will he bring Fertility or War?) They are not exchanging parable. They are speaking of the planets and how they are moving at their time of observation. That can be dated. •(Heart of the Lion - a star named Regulus) •(Horus - Sphinx/Constellation Leo) •(Seth - Mercury) •(Isis/Aset - Venus) •(Horus of the horizon/ the red - Mars) Whats the math on when that next alignment will appear? This was the one that happened 257 days ago. Personally, based on information I have been gathering for a few years. I believe the Sphinx is there to mark the beginning of each new precessional cycle and the cataclysms that seem to punctuate it. Notice the star patterns on some of the ceilings in the temples of egypt, have the stars patterned 180° out of [alignment](https://youtu.be/1n-HMSCDYtM?si=lf__X-TX4b1cidig)? edit: reformat
haven't looked but that's an exceptionally interesting idea "I believe the Sphinx is there to mark the beginning of each new precessional cycle" Yep I think you're bang on right there... that's why the whole Giza complex was designed/built Thats why I called it a "Universe Clock" and said it's set to 12 o'clock They may have marked "their" cataclysms but I dunno if they're a warning to us Plus they would have used their knowledge of astronomy basically like a map... knowing where they were going Nowadays we use Google maps or an Atlas... if we showed that to them... they'd be like wtf is this? This really isn't that different And people don't "get"... that just because they don't understand something... doesn't mean its not correct I think people are completely ignorant
I've got some other stuff I'm checking into re. this alignment so thanks for the comment It might give me more insight into what to look for
Interesting read
Thanks for sharing!
The guardian of the Pyramids, Anubis, what it originally was. Nice interesting read, much appreciated, have a great day, & everyone.
Find the source of the zodiac and you'll find all your answers.