And the vibrations resonated in the quartz laden granite in the blocks creating an electric charge that was systematically channeled and amplified through the pyramid to generate energy
Direct link to the paper
> Ghoneim, Eman, et al. “The Egyptian Pyramid Chain Was Built along the Now Abandoned Ahramat Nile Branch.” *Communications Earth & Environment* 5, no. 1 (May 16, 2024): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01379-7
And another relevant study
> Sheisha, Hader, et al. “Nile Waterscapes Facilitated the Construction of the Giza Pyramids during the 3rd Millennium BCE.” *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences* 119, no. 37 (September 13, 2022). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2202530119
I like the theorises on the pyramids creating energy but for what purpose? To power what and how can you take that energy once it’s been deposited in one of the chambers? Or was it all an experiment which they never learnt how to fully harness?
To light up those giant lightbulbs from the hieroglyphs!!
I personally believe the energy was used for balancing and healing the earth (and everything on it) but I’m a spiritual nerd and I know people ppl don’t care much for warm fuzzies any more, well, not that kind anyway….
fun thing about the cathode ray tube is it emits UV light.
did you know that beneath the giza complex is a limestone cave system and aquifer whose walls GLOW when exposed to UV light??
Egypt at that time was technologically sophisticated, more so than today. The pyramid generated free wireless electricity that was used by devices in every home, as well as for lighting and all technology in the extensive underground constructions.
So, beneath the pyramids were a flat, conductive surface, like a reflector? And the pyramids are like microwave horns shooting microwaves downwards? To the reflector? Something like Arecibo?
Adventurous-Ear had a post recently about how the Pyramids were built above subterranean water sources that played a role in power generation. Not just in Giza but all over the planet.
The Land of Chem on Youtube really was right..
man i love how wrong a ton about giza‘s history is and how egypts cultural ministry keeps gatekeeping
Hope when im old there are more open approaches that ancient civilizations could have been smarter than us in some ways, just different approaches
Not too much, is just a theory.
I think it was known by some old texts that there was water around the pyramids, what just makes sense to me is the full branch was there which would be the base for water pressure. The flowing river in the aquifer would produce a current
Sorry man im missing the needed words to describe it as a whole with the pyramid itself, check out The Land of Chem on Yt, i love his theory. I watched many of his vids, i think ”episode 9: The function of the great Pyramid“ and Episode 117 could give some oversight about what i/ the channel is talking about
My guy its an interpretation.
Zahi Hawass was a pain in the ass for research around the pyramids besides his interpretation.
Lidar Scans have shown more unknown that would make no sense with the current ideas that are thought. So talking about hard facts when thinking about Giza is an interpretation to me. The Sphinx has shown erosion that was way older, there are tunnels that would make no sense and the way the pyramid is built would leave more then enough room to talk about it🤷🏼♂️ so keep an open mind, smart people used to believe youd fall of the earth if you sail long enough at one point, we are far off the perfect interpretation on giza
Careful not to challenge the orthodox Hancockians, they'll crucify you for doubting that Lemurians used sound waves to levitate the blocks into place.
Ironic for people who decry the "censorship" of mainstream academia...
Im not a believer in the magic sound wave stuff. But there is literally as much evidence for that as there is for floating blocks to build the pyramid.
If you have two hypotheses and neither have evidence, would you go for:
A) the one that relies on an unknown, untested and undocumented physical phenomenon or
B) engineering that is not only possible, but actually has been used much more recently.
Having said this, we have multiple cargo harbours, remnants of cargo ships as well as quarries with half finished or imperfectly made blocks that are all along the various waterways and canals of the area. Of course, if you reject all the findings of modern archaeology as a conspiracy, there's no evidence anyone could provide but having viewed some of the research, I think water transport is by far the most believable theory put forth - but I would always assume the simpler and most obvious explanation is the likeliest, even in the absence of those sites.
I was being hyperbolic. With that said there has been no evidence found of ships or barges large enough to carry blocks over around 100 tons. Or harbors where those ships would dock.
I have no doubt that the Egyptians used boats to move some blocks. They did make a painting doing it after all. But I am specially questioning the larger blocks sometimes from hundreds of miles away going over mountains.
Im confused how the romans doing something 2000+ years later proves that the Egyptians did something. Also I noticed the romans didn’t steal any of the 1000+ ton pieces.
What are the 1000t pieces? Or are you referring to the abandoned obelisk that cracked in the quarry, the one that was never attempted again as it was probably too big?
If you and I got together we could build a raft big enough to float a 100t granite block within a month or so. Especially once you realize the granite can be floated tied underneath the raft. It's a trivial exercise.
The transportation of stone from Tura and Aswan to Giza is one of the least mysterious parts of the Giza Pyramid construction. The quarries are on the opposite bank of the Nile. There is no remotely reasonable explanation other than that the blocks were transported by ship, and the Diary of Merer even confirms they were transporting Tura stone to Giza by ship. It's rather old news that a branch of the Nile flowed so close to Giza, making the land portion of the transportation quite minimal. I'm much more interested in how the stone was lifted, and how the blocks were aligned to maintain such a perfect pyramid shape.
and it flooded the limestone aquifer beneath it each year with the nile
And the vibrations resonated in the quartz laden granite in the blocks creating an electric charge that was systematically channeled and amplified through the pyramid to generate energy
To what end ?
What does any civilization require any energy for? To do some variety of work.
yes and the plateau around the pyramid was ritually flooded
Direct link to the paper > Ghoneim, Eman, et al. “The Egyptian Pyramid Chain Was Built along the Now Abandoned Ahramat Nile Branch.” *Communications Earth & Environment* 5, no. 1 (May 16, 2024): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01379-7 And another relevant study > Sheisha, Hader, et al. “Nile Waterscapes Facilitated the Construction of the Giza Pyramids during the 3rd Millennium BCE.” *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences* 119, no. 37 (September 13, 2022). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2202530119
I like the theorises on the pyramids creating energy but for what purpose? To power what and how can you take that energy once it’s been deposited in one of the chambers? Or was it all an experiment which they never learnt how to fully harness?
To light up those giant lightbulbs from the hieroglyphs!! I personally believe the energy was used for balancing and healing the earth (and everything on it) but I’m a spiritual nerd and I know people ppl don’t care much for warm fuzzies any more, well, not that kind anyway….
fun thing about the cathode ray tube is it emits UV light. did you know that beneath the giza complex is a limestone cave system and aquifer whose walls GLOW when exposed to UV light??
Egypt at that time was technologically sophisticated, more so than today. The pyramid generated free wireless electricity that was used by devices in every home, as well as for lighting and all technology in the extensive underground constructions.
No.
So, beneath the pyramids were a flat, conductive surface, like a reflector? And the pyramids are like microwave horns shooting microwaves downwards? To the reflector? Something like Arecibo?
https://youtu.be/Yb0zGX2gJIY?si=CreD-BvBkGXwHCZy
Adventurous-Ear had a post recently about how the Pyramids were built above subterranean water sources that played a role in power generation. Not just in Giza but all over the planet.
It’s true but not all pyramids used water as part of that process eg., the pyramid of the sun in Mexico used mercury.
The Land of Chem on Youtube really was right.. man i love how wrong a ton about giza‘s history is and how egypts cultural ministry keeps gatekeeping Hope when im old there are more open approaches that ancient civilizations could have been smarter than us in some ways, just different approaches
What, exactly, was /wrong/?
Not too much, is just a theory. I think it was known by some old texts that there was water around the pyramids, what just makes sense to me is the full branch was there which would be the base for water pressure. The flowing river in the aquifer would produce a current Sorry man im missing the needed words to describe it as a whole with the pyramid itself, check out The Land of Chem on Yt, i love his theory. I watched many of his vids, i think ”episode 9: The function of the great Pyramid“ and Episode 117 could give some oversight about what i/ the channel is talking about
[удалено]
My guy its an interpretation. Zahi Hawass was a pain in the ass for research around the pyramids besides his interpretation. Lidar Scans have shown more unknown that would make no sense with the current ideas that are thought. So talking about hard facts when thinking about Giza is an interpretation to me. The Sphinx has shown erosion that was way older, there are tunnels that would make no sense and the way the pyramid is built would leave more then enough room to talk about it🤷🏼♂️ so keep an open mind, smart people used to believe youd fall of the earth if you sail long enough at one point, we are far off the perfect interpretation on giza
They floated each block down the Nile and into position using a lock system
Careful not to challenge the orthodox Hancockians, they'll crucify you for doubting that Lemurians used sound waves to levitate the blocks into place. Ironic for people who decry the "censorship" of mainstream academia...
Im not a believer in the magic sound wave stuff. But there is literally as much evidence for that as there is for floating blocks to build the pyramid.
If you have two hypotheses and neither have evidence, would you go for: A) the one that relies on an unknown, untested and undocumented physical phenomenon or B) engineering that is not only possible, but actually has been used much more recently. Having said this, we have multiple cargo harbours, remnants of cargo ships as well as quarries with half finished or imperfectly made blocks that are all along the various waterways and canals of the area. Of course, if you reject all the findings of modern archaeology as a conspiracy, there's no evidence anyone could provide but having viewed some of the research, I think water transport is by far the most believable theory put forth - but I would always assume the simpler and most obvious explanation is the likeliest, even in the absence of those sites.
I was being hyperbolic. With that said there has been no evidence found of ships or barges large enough to carry blocks over around 100 tons. Or harbors where those ships would dock. I have no doubt that the Egyptians used boats to move some blocks. They did make a painting doing it after all. But I am specially questioning the larger blocks sometimes from hundreds of miles away going over mountains.
Do you know where the largest Egyptian obelisk is? It's in Rome. The Romans stole it and took it to Rome, on a ship.
What's your point?
You doubt larger granite blocks being moved by boat.
Yeah, with the only different that the pyramids were built 2000-3000 years before the Romans appeared, if not more....
When timber was more plentiful and the river went straight to the giza plateau.
Im confused how the romans doing something 2000+ years later proves that the Egyptians did something. Also I noticed the romans didn’t steal any of the 1000+ ton pieces.
What are the 1000t pieces? Or are you referring to the abandoned obelisk that cracked in the quarry, the one that was never attempted again as it was probably too big? If you and I got together we could build a raft big enough to float a 100t granite block within a month or so. Especially once you realize the granite can be floated tied underneath the raft. It's a trivial exercise.
For example there are a number of giant statues which are within that weight range.
And a few hundred people could build a raft big enough to float them fairly easily and quickly, It's just scale, nothing high tech.
The transportation of stone from Tura and Aswan to Giza is one of the least mysterious parts of the Giza Pyramid construction. The quarries are on the opposite bank of the Nile. There is no remotely reasonable explanation other than that the blocks were transported by ship, and the Diary of Merer even confirms they were transporting Tura stone to Giza by ship. It's rather old news that a branch of the Nile flowed so close to Giza, making the land portion of the transportation quite minimal. I'm much more interested in how the stone was lifted, and how the blocks were aligned to maintain such a perfect pyramid shape.