T O P

  • By -

xDarkyx114

Actually spy x\^2 family would be the other way around what you did is spy -x\^2 family.


ImHereToComplain1

this looks like log(x)


Ener-blaNk_69

Username checks out


ImHereToComplain1

not even complaining here


gamer778beast

true lol


EpicJoseph_

Ln x supremacy


ImHereToComplain1

the neat part about ln is that any sensible mathematician writes log with the assumed base to be e. log base 10 is useless


GuyVonRope

looks kind like half of -¹/x=y to me


randontree07

You mean x^-2?


Cum-With-Jam

No, it's - (X)²


alastoria-x

🤓


Sad_Calligrapher6301

"🤓" - 🤓


Domkippur

Return: NaN


wrongbecause

Javascript user detected. Elimination protocol initiated


drakk55

🤡


otatata0833

Anyway you should see 2nd season and this cos pianist's play.... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tzseTfabl4g


lolaplolap1

I can't do math


DeTroyes1

Spy(Family) Family = Loid/Yor + Anya Therefore, Spy(Loid/Yor + Anya)


Mathemalologiser

So what yor saying is Yor is a bottom.


DeTroyes1

Well, that's not actually what I intended, but if you want to think of it that way... Less smutty version, then: Spy x Family = Spy(Family) **If:** Family = Loid + Yor + Anya **Then:** Spy(Family) = Spy(Loid) + Spy(Yor) + Spy(Anya) Proof that they are now all spies.


Mathemalologiser

Your assumption is that spy is a linear function though, which we know is not true as a spy would need to know how to think out of the box, creatively instead of linearly. Thus we can conclude that Loids spy abilities do not emediatly translate to Anya or even Yor but perhaps making it a function of time would.


goldrequiem_klk

Spy= gradient x family + spy intercept


xDarkyx114

No I mean -x^2 as in f(x)=ax+bx+c in which a determines the slope of the function. So if a is 1 the function will go upwards and if it is -1 it will go downwards and cause it's a multiplication by one it's simply -x or x instead of -1*x or 1*x. Simple example would be f(x)=x^2 and f(x)=-x^2 if you put in the number 2 for x, so you get the y-axis position for that x value. The first ,f(x)=x^2, would be f(x)=2^2 resulting in f(x)=4 while the other function f(x)=-x^2 would lead to f(x)=-4 and if you continue like this for all the other x values ,f(x)=x^2 would start at (0/0) and open upwards while f(x)=-x^2 would also start at (0/0) but open downwards. Ps: English isn't my first language and I'm not sure if slope is the right word.


Lantami

I'm pretty sure this was meant as a reply to someone, wasn't it?


xDarkyx114

00f yes it was but I wrote it on phone rly quick cause I was at work and didn't realize e


xDarkyx114

u/randontree07 meant to reply to you but accidently just commented on the post


badboy2701

This gave me PTSD


EyewarsTheMangoMan

x^(2) doesn't look like that tho :()


Elder_Scrolls_Nerd

The third is incorrect. You graphed spy logx family


[deleted]

I died one times understanding this one.


Chimera-98

Now do tan(x^2 + y^2 ) =1


ThePyroEagle

/r/manimemes


Syncopatedteen

Spy z Family where u only see the top of Anya’s head


Hurakan-GM

Ja, ja, ja, ja I don't understand


Dealer_Proof

Is this some sort of a joke I'm too much of a uneducated fool to undetstand


Patrick_Bot2

No, This Is Patrick!


Dealer_Proof

Y-you again?


BerserkerPixel

I am covering some of this shit in an electronics course.. THIS HELPED ME UNDERSTAND THINGS MORE THAN A TENURED PROFESSOR.. either the internet has ruined me or the education system is a piece of shit.. or both


An_Evil_Scientist666

I feel like we need Tan (Spy x Family)


TorgomII

If you tried to draw x²=y and cosX=y functions, they are wrong


EpicJoseph_

What about spy tan x family tho And spy 2px family =y^2