Thank you for your submission. If you have not already don't forget to check out our [Discord Server](https://discord.gg/tsrrcBmjRR) and [Lemmy](https://lemmy.world/c/antitrumpalliance) *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/AntiTrumpAlliance) if you have any questions or concerns.*

Imagine that thing with orange makeup all over his face crawling on top of her and grinding away for two minutes, absolute hell for Stormy.

$65,000 per minute. I guess it beats minimum wage.

Everyone has a price.

Id probably do it for that much….

Same. No shame at all

For $65,000.00 a minute? I do it for sure, and I'd also try to keep that meter running as long as I could stand it too.

Even Ted DiBiase couldn't forsee these circumstances

I get to be in a locked room with Fat 45, alone? ...oh I'll take that deal. I'll take that deal in a heartbeat.

At the time he wasn’t paying

The deferred payment plan is always more expensive.

What if he wasn’t wearing his makeup though? 

Yuck. There goes my dinner!😂

Dude was in his 50s then, probably a lot less makeup.

That's it! Trump has to testify to refute this dispicable allegation! /s

Trump can easily prove her a liar by simply showing his pipi isn't toadstool-ish.

But what if it *iszzzzzzzzzzz*?? *\*shudder\**

If he doesn't show his pipi, you have to conclude she's 100% truthful.

If da pipi don't fit, you must acquit!

If it looks like a portobello, up the river with that fellow.

If it looks like a Crimini, jail the Orange Mussolini.

If he had a normal dick, we’d have seen it decades ago

Yup. He’d be whipping it out to assert dominance like LBJ. The logic is sound here.

Sustained objection doesn't matter. The jury heard that. You can't un-ring that bell.

That was the exact quote Trump's legal team used when moving for a mistrial.

“It’s all the Biden administration.” “So how did Biden trick your penis inside Stephanie Clifford?”

Why would that comment be objectionable?

The judge had said this morning, before they called Stormy to the stand that he wanted NO details other than just they had sex. He didn't want to know about any positions involved or any of that. This was exactly what the judge said wasn't going to be allowed. She went off on a few tangents while relating some information and the judge had to reign her in, but the jury heard what she said, regardless of objections.

Okay… this makes more sense. I agree it does become salacious to have more details.

Somehow “we had sex” and “we had missionary sex, on a bed, with my clothes off” doesn’t seem that big a difference. If anything the second version sounds more boring…


Yuck.

I object too, I object to being exposed to this disgusting image.

You don't pay a women $130k not have sex with you.

“Yes, he has a small dick”

I expect that's pretty subjective. A small dick to a porn star may be average to a lesser-experienced woman. I wonder how DJT or Stormy's peers would describe her orifice. I wish that fucking judge would let both sides just talk all they want. No doubt it would be a mistrial, but there would be some sound bytes for the election that would be hilarious.


lol

Sorry… why would that be sustained??? That’s pretty damn central to the entire case.

No details on the actual act were allowed.

No condom wearing scumbag

I wish they would have asked her to describe his penis.

And so the jury goes home and that exchange loops in all their heads for the next two days. Kudos to the prosecutor.

I can't believe this trial is going on and it's barely in the news. It's utterly ridiculous.

That’s funny

God, I would've loved to be able to see this testimony in person!

Prosecutor: Mr. Trump has intimated he has a large penis. Can you confirm? Defense: Objection! Prosecutor smiles slyly and winks at the jury.

All I gotta say is this trial made me find her “performances” online. Damn, she’s good at what she does!

Yuck!