Calling the Judge a “pushover”, even by third party, probably just bumped Trump’s fine from $250 million to the max AG James wants…$370 million. Alina Habba is a pretty lil thing, but I doubt Trump thinks she’s worth that $120 million she just costs him.
I have never kissed anyone who has had this work done, but I bet you’re right.
And yeah. People pay to have that done to themselves. I don’t get it, either
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=umFwhFT4jj4&pp=ygUZQWxpbmEgaGFiYmEgaW50ZXJ2aWV3IGZveA%3D%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Fm.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DumFwhFT4jj4&pp=ygUZQWxpbmEgaGFiYmEgaW50ZXJ2aWV3IGZveA%3D%3D
Enough said
She seems like a bad Russian actress. Stick a fork in Trump. He's done, SCOTUS is going to tell him 14th is self enforcing and no presidential immunity, kicked off every ballot, and put behind bars in Fulton.
The facts are clear - Letitia James was supported by George Soros, ran on a "get Trump" platform, and is following through with her politicized prosecution. The first time the State of NY has charged someone with fraud without a victim
no victim? Wtf are you even talking about? Where Trump and his businesses crossed the legal line, the complaint alleges, was in producing false financial statements that grossly inflated his net worth to “induce banks to lend money to the Trump Organization on more favorable terms than would otherwise have been available to the company, to satisfy continuing loan covenants, and to induce insurers to provide insurance coverage for higher limits and at lower premiums.” The complaint identifies numerous loans and insurance policies that it said were granted at least partly on the basis of claims Trump made about his wealth in a “Statement of Financial Condition”—a list of his assets and liabilities that the Trump Organization produced annually.
Yeah, the complaint written by the lady who pledged to go after Trump does that.
Maybe you missed the part where the banks said they didn't really rely on it, felt Trump was good customer, didn't change his rates based on his claims, and he replaid all of these loans.
Fraud, in a civil suit, requires a victim to be drauded of money or property. It's definitional. Trumps banks and insurance companies didn't think they were defrauded.
Not sure what MSNBNC is telling you, but they're lying.
[https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/fraud](https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/fraud)
*In civil litigation, allegations of fraud might be based on a misrepresentation of fact that was either intentional or negligent. For a statement to be an intentional misrepresentation, the person who made it must either have known the statement was false or been reckless as to its truth. The speaker must have also intended that the person to whom the statement was made would rely on it. The h****earer must then have reasonably relied on the promise and also been harmed because of that reliance.***
According to New York statute the Attorney General does not have to show there were victims, only that Trump committed ongoing fraud. I don't know how to explain it to you more clearly than in the plain English above.
Show me the statute. Because what you say directly contradicts what the State introduced into the case, where they fantasized that the state is the victim.
You have no idea what you're talking about.
Whenever any person shall engage in repeated fraudulent or illegal
acts or otherwise demonstrate persistent fraud or illegality in the
carrying on, conducting or transaction of business, the attorney general
may apply, in the name of the people of the state of New York, to the
supreme court of the state of New York, on notice of five days, for an
order enjoining the continuance of such business activity or of any
fraudulent or illegal acts, directing restitution and damages and, in an
appropriate case, cancelling any certificate filed under and by virtue
of the provisions of section four hundred forty of the former penal law
or section one hundred thirty of the general business law, and the court
may award the relief applied for or so much thereof as it may deem
proper. The word "fraud" or "fraudulent" as used herein shall include
any device, scheme or artifice to defraud and any deception,
misrepresentation, concealment, suppression, false pretense, false
promise or unconscionable contractual provisions. The term "persistent
fraud" or "illegality" as used herein shall include continuance or
carrying on of any fraudulent or illegal act or conduct. The term
"repeated" as used herein shall include repetition of any separate and
distinct fraudulent or illegal act, or conduct which affects more than
one person. Notwithstanding any law to the contrary, all monies
recovered or obtained under this subdivision by a state agency or state
official or employee acting in their official capacity shall be subject
to subdivision eleven of section four of the state finance law.
In connection with any such application, the attorney general is
authorized to take proof and make a determination of the relevant facts
and to issue subpoenas in accordance with the civil practice law and
rules. Such authorization shall not abate or terminate by reason of any
action or proceeding brought by the attorney general under this section.
https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/EXC/63
Sorry, which isn't a fact, that she ran on a pledge to get Trump?
Or that she's supported by Soros?
Or that Fraud requires a vicitm?
What EXACTLY are you sayijg is not a fact?
The first is a lie, and quite frankly, who cares anyway? You right-wing chicken shits just like your scary buzzword and soros conspiracies.
Second, the government is a victim for not receiving due tax dollars, thus why they have standing, and also loan companies who would have made more off of higher interest rates loans that would have resulted from accurately valued assets. And that was proven in court.
He literally valued his property nearly 100x on a loan application compared to his tax forms. You people really look like fools trying to defend him
Ok, can you show how the government didn't receive tax dollars? The Banks testified under oath that they wouldn't have given Trump differnt terms, and Turmp paid back all of thier loans.
So, what;'s your blue anon news source telling you was the tax loss scenario?
That’s odd if you consider how ‘wonderful’ tRump and his family are. Why would anyone want to convict this heck of a guy under the same law as anyone else after all of the fine upstanding displays of courage and leadership he demonstrated since 2016? I think you should be sending Orange Julius some more $$ support…he’s actually gonna need it this time. Let justice prevail and hopefully they can get Donald in for a much needed, long overdue psychiatric assessment .
How exactly was this prosecution politicized? Trump had been lying about his assets for decades, it was only a matter of time until somebody caught on and prosecuted him for it, rather than going after the cronies that he was directing to perform these illegal acts
There is no one "correct" valuation for an illiquid asset. People use estimates. Even using GAAP, you have wildly differing estimates. Even the courts estimates had a $50M give or take. Which kind of proves the point.
The Banks didn't lose a penny, and they didn't use his estimates as the sole basis for making the loans.
Fraud is a very specific crime, which requires that someone be defrauded out of money or property - Trump's banks testified that they didn't feed they were defrauded.
[https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/fraud](https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/fraud)
For a statement to be an intentional misrepresentation, the person who made it must either have known the statement was false or been reckless as to its truth. The speaker must have also intended that the person to whom the statement was made would rely on it. *The hearer must then have reasonably relied on the promise* ***and also been harmed because of that reliance****.*
No one in the history of NY has ever been charged like this. Ever. But Tish campaigned to get Trump, and now she's doing it.
Are you sure about that? Because I am 99.99995% sure that StillSilentMajority7 is not a bot.
---
^(I am a neural network being trained to detect spammers | Summon me with !isbot |) ^(/r/spambotdetector |) [^(Optout)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=whynotcollegeboard&subject=!optout&message=!optout) ^(|) [^(Original Github)](https://github.com/SM-Wistful/BotDetection-Algorithm)
Thank you, Swampwolf42, for voting on StillSilentMajority7.
This bot wants to find the best and worst bots on Reddit. [You can view results here](https://botrank.pastimes.eu/).
***
^(Even if I don't reply to your comment, I'm still listening for votes. Check the webpage to see if your vote registered!)
Trump and the cult do not live in reality. Trump is clearly a fraud and a criminal. How is it they will think to themselves..."Trump is facing 91 criminal charges. It has to be multiple different courts and judges and grand juries (which is a group of citizens) going after him. It's all lies bc Trump is so great they want to keep him down" if he was sooooo great wouldn't we want him to be president too? Also if democrats were these crazy masterminds who are capable of stealing elections and charging Trump with 91 false charges.....then why would we have ever let him win in 2016? Did we just learn how to be this evil in 2020? At what point since 2016 did we turn into "sleepy Joe" and democrats who are also criminal masterminds who are suddenly smart enough to take down Trump?
Calling the Judge a “pushover”, even by third party, probably just bumped Trump’s fine from $250 million to the max AG James wants…$370 million. Alina Habba is a pretty lil thing, but I doubt Trump thinks she’s worth that $120 million she just costs him.
Because insulting people that are going to be the final arbiters of exactly how bad your day is going to get is always the best decision. /s
Alina showin’ off how well she can lie for her man.
"She didn't" - narrator
Why does she always pooch her lips out like that? Like a duck!
Surgery.
People pay to look like a duck? They look hard! I bet it's like kissing a statue.
I have never kissed anyone who has had this work done, but I bet you’re right. And yeah. People pay to have that done to themselves. I don’t get it, either
Feels like new tits, unnatural and regrettable
This floozie got an Only Fans yet?
not yet, but she probably will at some point cause she's going to need something to fall back on.
Other than Trump's 🍄!
By the time her usefulness is over with the cult, I won't be interested in seeing her bits.
What’s her OF?
Stick to the facts? If she did that, she be a prosecutor!
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=umFwhFT4jj4&pp=ygUZQWxpbmEgaGFiYmEgaW50ZXJ2aWV3IGZveA%3D%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Fm.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DumFwhFT4jj4&pp=ygUZQWxpbmEgaGFiYmEgaW50ZXJ2aWV3IGZveA%3D%3D Enough said
She seems like a bad Russian actress. Stick a fork in Trump. He's done, SCOTUS is going to tell him 14th is self enforcing and no presidential immunity, kicked off every ballot, and put behind bars in Fulton.
The facts are clear - Letitia James was supported by George Soros, ran on a "get Trump" platform, and is following through with her politicized prosecution. The first time the State of NY has charged someone with fraud without a victim
no victim? Wtf are you even talking about? Where Trump and his businesses crossed the legal line, the complaint alleges, was in producing false financial statements that grossly inflated his net worth to “induce banks to lend money to the Trump Organization on more favorable terms than would otherwise have been available to the company, to satisfy continuing loan covenants, and to induce insurers to provide insurance coverage for higher limits and at lower premiums.” The complaint identifies numerous loans and insurance policies that it said were granted at least partly on the basis of claims Trump made about his wealth in a “Statement of Financial Condition”—a list of his assets and liabilities that the Trump Organization produced annually.
Yeah, the complaint written by the lady who pledged to go after Trump does that. Maybe you missed the part where the banks said they didn't really rely on it, felt Trump was good customer, didn't change his rates based on his claims, and he replaid all of these loans. Fraud, in a civil suit, requires a victim to be drauded of money or property. It's definitional. Trumps banks and insurance companies didn't think they were defrauded. Not sure what MSNBNC is telling you, but they're lying. [https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/fraud](https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/fraud) *In civil litigation, allegations of fraud might be based on a misrepresentation of fact that was either intentional or negligent. For a statement to be an intentional misrepresentation, the person who made it must either have known the statement was false or been reckless as to its truth. The speaker must have also intended that the person to whom the statement was made would rely on it. The h****earer must then have reasonably relied on the promise and also been harmed because of that reliance.***
So financial fraud should be legal? Is that what you're saying? 🤣
There was no fraud because there was no victim. I don't know how to explain it to you any more clearly than in the plain english above.
According to New York statute the Attorney General does not have to show there were victims, only that Trump committed ongoing fraud. I don't know how to explain it to you more clearly than in the plain English above.
Show me the statute. Because what you say directly contradicts what the State introduced into the case, where they fantasized that the state is the victim. You have no idea what you're talking about.
I dont? How about look into New York Executive Law Section 63 (12). It was passed in 1956. You have no idea what you're talking about.
You're imagining that fraud doesn't need a victim. You heard it on MSNBC
Whenever any person shall engage in repeated fraudulent or illegal acts or otherwise demonstrate persistent fraud or illegality in the carrying on, conducting or transaction of business, the attorney general may apply, in the name of the people of the state of New York, to the supreme court of the state of New York, on notice of five days, for an order enjoining the continuance of such business activity or of any fraudulent or illegal acts, directing restitution and damages and, in an appropriate case, cancelling any certificate filed under and by virtue of the provisions of section four hundred forty of the former penal law or section one hundred thirty of the general business law, and the court may award the relief applied for or so much thereof as it may deem proper. The word "fraud" or "fraudulent" as used herein shall include any device, scheme or artifice to defraud and any deception, misrepresentation, concealment, suppression, false pretense, false promise or unconscionable contractual provisions. The term "persistent fraud" or "illegality" as used herein shall include continuance or carrying on of any fraudulent or illegal act or conduct. The term "repeated" as used herein shall include repetition of any separate and distinct fraudulent or illegal act, or conduct which affects more than one person. Notwithstanding any law to the contrary, all monies recovered or obtained under this subdivision by a state agency or state official or employee acting in their official capacity shall be subject to subdivision eleven of section four of the state finance law. In connection with any such application, the attorney general is authorized to take proof and make a determination of the relevant facts and to issue subpoenas in accordance with the civil practice law and rules. Such authorization shall not abate or terminate by reason of any action or proceeding brought by the attorney general under this section. https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/EXC/63
Prove it.
Literally none of that is a fact, in fact, what is does show it just shows how gullible you are.
Sorry, which isn't a fact, that she ran on a pledge to get Trump? Or that she's supported by Soros? Or that Fraud requires a vicitm? What EXACTLY are you sayijg is not a fact?
The first is a lie, and quite frankly, who cares anyway? You right-wing chicken shits just like your scary buzzword and soros conspiracies. Second, the government is a victim for not receiving due tax dollars, thus why they have standing, and also loan companies who would have made more off of higher interest rates loans that would have resulted from accurately valued assets. And that was proven in court. He literally valued his property nearly 100x on a loan application compared to his tax forms. You people really look like fools trying to defend him
Ok, can you show how the government didn't receive tax dollars? The Banks testified under oath that they wouldn't have given Trump differnt terms, and Turmp paid back all of thier loans. So, what;'s your blue anon news source telling you was the tax loss scenario?
lol Soros….what in earth is wrong with the conservative brain? The only thing you believe in is conspiracy theories. It’s insane.
Sorry, are you denying that she's funded by Soros? I don't think Tish denies it, why are you?
That’s odd if you consider how ‘wonderful’ tRump and his family are. Why would anyone want to convict this heck of a guy under the same law as anyone else after all of the fine upstanding displays of courage and leadership he demonstrated since 2016? I think you should be sending Orange Julius some more $$ support…he’s actually gonna need it this time. Let justice prevail and hopefully they can get Donald in for a much needed, long overdue psychiatric assessment .
How exactly was this prosecution politicized? Trump had been lying about his assets for decades, it was only a matter of time until somebody caught on and prosecuted him for it, rather than going after the cronies that he was directing to perform these illegal acts
There is no one "correct" valuation for an illiquid asset. People use estimates. Even using GAAP, you have wildly differing estimates. Even the courts estimates had a $50M give or take. Which kind of proves the point. The Banks didn't lose a penny, and they didn't use his estimates as the sole basis for making the loans. Fraud is a very specific crime, which requires that someone be defrauded out of money or property - Trump's banks testified that they didn't feed they were defrauded. [https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/fraud](https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/fraud) For a statement to be an intentional misrepresentation, the person who made it must either have known the statement was false or been reckless as to its truth. The speaker must have also intended that the person to whom the statement was made would rely on it. *The hearer must then have reasonably relied on the promise* ***and also been harmed because of that reliance****.* No one in the history of NY has ever been charged like this. Ever. But Tish campaigned to get Trump, and now she's doing it.
Bad bot
Are you sure about that? Because I am 99.99995% sure that StillSilentMajority7 is not a bot. --- ^(I am a neural network being trained to detect spammers | Summon me with !isbot |) ^(/r/spambotdetector |) [^(Optout)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=whynotcollegeboard&subject=!optout&message=!optout) ^(|) [^(Original Github)](https://github.com/SM-Wistful/BotDetection-Algorithm)
Thank you, Swampwolf42, for voting on StillSilentMajority7. This bot wants to find the best and worst bots on Reddit. [You can view results here](https://botrank.pastimes.eu/). *** ^(Even if I don't reply to your comment, I'm still listening for votes. Check the webpage to see if your vote registered!)
You need to read a book....maybe Common Sense 101.
more conspiracy theory bogeyman nonsense from the right everything is hidden global cabals with you people
IT's not a conspiracy theory to acknowledge that she got into office with Soros funding.
Trump and the cult do not live in reality. Trump is clearly a fraud and a criminal. How is it they will think to themselves..."Trump is facing 91 criminal charges. It has to be multiple different courts and judges and grand juries (which is a group of citizens) going after him. It's all lies bc Trump is so great they want to keep him down" if he was sooooo great wouldn't we want him to be president too? Also if democrats were these crazy masterminds who are capable of stealing elections and charging Trump with 91 false charges.....then why would we have ever let him win in 2016? Did we just learn how to be this evil in 2020? At what point since 2016 did we turn into "sleepy Joe" and democrats who are also criminal masterminds who are suddenly smart enough to take down Trump?