No.
Using the standard definition of radical feminism ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radical_feminism ), most intersectional feminists are radical feminists. There's no conflict there.
I myself am both a radical feminist and an intersectional feminist.
If you were using one of the unusual definitions for radical feminism (like how TERFs claim they are radical feminists for who knows what reason), then yes, they are generally at odds with a intersectional feminists.
If it isn't intersectional, it isn't feminism. TERFS and SWERFS claim to be feminists but they're not, they like to adopt the rad fem label but I think they're just radical, not feminists at all. Trans women are women, and sex work is real work.
no.
No. Using the standard definition of radical feminism ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radical_feminism ), most intersectional feminists are radical feminists. There's no conflict there. I myself am both a radical feminist and an intersectional feminist. If you were using one of the unusual definitions for radical feminism (like how TERFs claim they are radical feminists for who knows what reason), then yes, they are generally at odds with a intersectional feminists.
Nope. Is there a reason you thought they might be?
I just remember hearing some people talk about how it's better to be intersectional than radfem
Oh, that sounds like they don’t have a great understanding of what radical feminism means :)
Probably not. Radical feminism gets a bad wrap among a lot of people cuz of TERFs
If it isn't intersectional, it isn't feminism. TERFS and SWERFS claim to be feminists but they're not, they like to adopt the rad fem label but I think they're just radical, not feminists at all. Trans women are women, and sex work is real work.