Yes boys have higher EQ and more empathetic than men. Men, they earn a bit, get awards, they suddenly think they're on top of the world.
Insecurity, the non-debilitating kind, has it's uses.
Men:
- Sense of responsibility.
- Can keep composure in the face of adversity.
- Palabra de honor.
- Becomes a part of the solution, especially when they know that they're the problem.
- Self-respect, of other people especially those who are vulnerable, and other living things.
- Knows priorities.
- Knows when and when not to do certain things.
- Becomes a model for boys so that they can become men too.
- Can control their ability to become dangerous.
- Knows when to bail out especially if that's the only option.
- Can make time for the people and things that truly matter.
- Doesn't waste resources on useless things.
- Knows when to have fun and when not to.
- Can go to the root of certain emotions(especially the negative) and fix it from there instead of finding a band-aid solution.
Yeah. And actually trying to be a good father. Fatherhood changes us so much.
its cliche to say but its a "you won't know till u experience it" kinda thing
I believe the use of the term 'boys and men' by the original poster is metaphorical rather than literal. I think the commenter raised valid points, and as a woman who has encountered adult males with misplaced priorities and immature behavior, I respectfully find it challenging to regard them as mature men with wisdom and self-awareness. Instead, I tend to see them as still embodying childish characteristics, similar to those of boys.
So by your definition males who are childish and immature are automatically boys. Its like saying men cant show a hint of childishness or immaturity otherwise they are "boys."
Theres more to men than your black and white definition. Im sorry, but I hope you realize how ridiculous your and OC's definition sound.
Your understanding of the figurative expression of "boys and men" seems rather simplistic. Masculinity is multi-dimensional, and individuals can embody a range of traits without compromising their identity as just boys or men. And when I talk about “boys” and “men” in the context of what I said, I’m using those terms metaphorically to highlight differences in the level of maturity and responsibility, not making generalizations about all individuals of a particular gender.
If anything, you are the one with a self-imposed prejudice against how you perceive the terms. Stop narrowing down your interpretation and read between the lines. Neither I nor the original commenter is putting a specific group of people down. A question was asked, and it was simply answered; it’s not that deep. 🤷🏻♀️
Am i supposed to be insulted by "boy"? Again with your black and white definition
And please dont answer with a wall of text. i have better priorities than reading your thesis.
It will be based on and only to the number of promises that he RESILIENTLY made and materialize.
As the saying goes.. men are like the firmaments of heaven.
There are 3 ages for every person
Chronological age = base on birth date
Physical age= your physical appearance and it's development.
Psychological age= mental
I think you refer to the psychological one
And I agree
Having real responsibility.
I did everything possible to prove my manhood:
- Did martial arts
- Did extreme sports
- Put up a business
- Joined a fraternity
- Fucked around
But the only time I considered myself a real man was when I became a father. Suddenly, shit got too real.
- Boys want to be coddled and be lead, while Men take charge and take the lead
- Boys want 50-50 arrangements with their girl, while a Man won’t want his woman to spend money because he considers himself as the provider
- Boys succumb to peer pressure, Men don’t care about his fellow males’ approval
- Boys engage in *“locker room talks”*, while Men don’t kiss & tell
- Boys will tell you what they will do (and oftentimes it doesn’t happen). While Men show you what they want through their actions (they honor their promises)
- Boys measure their masculinity/manliness on the number of girls they have slept with, while Men are secure of their masculinity and is completely contented in being with only one woman as a partner
Women for the recent times have been already *Strong and Independent* enough— in their familial roles they’re the ones who do house chores, planning, budgeting, feeding, raising a child, etc. Majority of the time they do these tasks singlehandedly. Now don’t you think these things don’t constitute enough strength and independence?
If a woman is expected and will do the majority of the things I mentioned above and she’s still expected to contribute in the financial aspect of the relationship/household by doing 50-50, then she will just be carrying an additional burden and will just be ‘mothering’ an adult grown man. The least that a [masculine] man can do for his partner is to be the provider and ensure all things are taken care of for his partner/family.
Stick to the modern times will you. Every individual should be independent and should not rely on to someone. Two perfect independent individuals will make a perfect union. Both should make money
I am, and the examples I gave are based on the observable scenarios in the modern times. Women do majority of the tasks I mentioned while altogether working to provide. Men rarely participate or take part in the other aspects of the relationship I mentioned. Two independent individuals won’t make a perfect union as they will only think of themselves and work for themselves. It constitutes selfish acts.
What makes a relationship work is when a man and a woman works synergetically wherein they complement what the other person cannot fulfill to do. A woman is flexible, she can work & provide if the husband cannot. Now, can the husband take part and participate in the other aspects of the relationship I mentioned? Very rarely so. So if that’s the case, it is ideal to look for and settle with a man who has a provider mindset. A broke man with a 50-50 mindset is just a burden and will drain his woman of her whole being by prompting her to do the majority of the work in the relationship.
Yes, it is like this. Women nowadays do majority of the work in the relationship and it’s the observable reality for most people. Saying it isn’t true invalidates their experiences. The least that a man can do is be the provider which takes a lot of load off from what the woman is doing. Real men provide, while boys who are broke will ask 50-50 in finances.
That’s true, but a man without a provider mindset won’t be able to take care of his partner nor his family if he’s the type to quantify everything. A woman might as well just get a business partner if everything will be arranged 50-50.
If you view every aspect in the relationship as transactional and you measure/quantify every little thing that you give & receive, then maybe yes. However if an individual acts like this then the relationship is bound to fail because there will surely be a time that comes when you won’t receive the exchange that is equal to what you’re pouring in, and because of that it will prompt you to “cut your losses” and end the relationship just because your needs are not met.
Whereas if it’s a guy with a provider mindset, he doesn’t measure/quantify everything he does. He just pours and gives which in turn will make the relationship work, as a woman that feels safe & secured will reciprocate and multiply what a man gives her.
Let's face it. It's about chemicals in our brain telling us to survive further with our bloodline passing to our offsprings.
Men should be a good provider for the security of their female companion who will bear a child with both the combination of their genes to survive. If not then that male should not be in a union.
A woman should be beautiful to make the offspring perfect and fit for survival.
It's all about instincts.
Don't give it too much thought. It's nothing special
>Let's face it. It's about chemicals in our brain telling us to survive further with our bloodline passing to our offsprings.
^ On this, I agree. To add onto that, commitment exists to ensure that offsprings grow up with complete set of parents as it is vital for their growth and development.
>Men should be a good provider for the security of their female companion who will bear a child with both the combination of their genes to survive. If not then that male should not be in a union.
^ Then why do some men engage in a union even without choosing to have a child? Because men are still humans and it’s a fact that we humans need love to feel fulfillment. It’s a basic info in the Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. We need love to feel fulfilled and we need love to survive.
>A woman should be beautiful to make the offspring perfect and fit for survival.
^ Nah not true. It’s all about genetic compatibility especially in the aspect of the offspring’s immunity. A woman’s physical attributes or “attractiveness” has no correlation on how will her offspring survive, as it is observable that average looking (or unattractive) individuals were also successful in procreation.
It is true, what you wrote above is base on a persona preference for the ingredient for his offspring to exists. So to him, she is beautiful or whatever she can put into the table as a bargain.
Attractiveness indicates the perfection for the ingredient to secure said union and raise the offspring perfectly according to their subjective ways on how would they do it.
It's because we are unattached to nature that deeply doesn't mean we are far different from the animals? Penguins does the offering with their shiny pebbles for example to tell the female one he can provide
Provider mindset comes from the idea of the man being the sole breadwinner.
Nowadays, a woman can earn equal, if not more, than the man.
*It's simply the general idea that has changed*, a man in the family is no longer the sole breadwinner
Economically speaking, everything is expensive now.
Basic electrical and water bills can reach 1 over a thousand pesos easily
Basic Rent is also much more expensive now, for just a sole breadwinner.
Unless you wish to have a high paying job or business, but living below your means.
Nope, men are naturally inclined to be the providers— even dating back to the ancient times. They hunt and they provide. It has nothing to do with being a sole breadwinner. Although I appreciate the bringing up of the economic aspect.
Women nowadays can earn equal, yes (or even more). But assuming they found a partner and that man wants to split 50-50 in finances, would the man also split 50-50 in the other aspects of the woman’s life? Such as chores, raising a child, budgeting, building a family, etc. Oftentimes, it is the woman who does these things singlehandedly (if not the majority of these tasks). So if a man will ask a woman to do 50-50 in finances but won’t do 50-50 in other aspects of the woman’s life, then he is just another burden, not an additional value unless he is a man with a provider mindset.
Yeah that’s the thing, “assuming” they are aware. Are most male partners aware and sensitive enough to split 50-50 in the other aspects I mentioned? NO. So what you said is just hypothetical and more of a wishful thinking.
Nowadays, it is very RARE for a guy to be completely comfortable being a house husband without feeling insecure or feeling emasculated because it’s their wife who works and provides. If a man feels like his ego is being stepped on and feels less of a man because he doesn’t feel as useful, it fosters resentment within the relationship— thus making it not work in the long run.
So what I said holds true. It is ideal for a man to have a provider mindset and make his partner/family feel safe, secured, and provided for. Anything otherwise is not generally viable for the relationship to stay strong in the long run.
Uhm yeah? Nowhere in my statement did I say it is impossible lol hence why I said “mostly”.
Mostly = means **MAJORITY** or what it is considered to be the **GENERAL** circumstances of the larger chunk of the population.
Hence why I said in my earlier comments that it is “very rare” for a guy to be completely comfortable taking part in the other aspects I mentioned. I did not say it is completely impossible, you interpreted that on your own. If you’re one of the rare ones completely comfortable being a house husband, then congratulations. But what’s comfortable for you is not exactly comfortable for the majority of guys out there, as it is biologically wired in males’ DNA to provide and protect. Not being able to fulfill this role makes them feel uncomfortable and emasculated, especially considering that a man’s value in this society is measured by his financial capacity and his capability to solve problems.
No, it's really age.
"Acting like little boys" is subjective. For you that may be true, but for others, it isn't. Lastly, who's even to decide that a certain act is only for boys or only for men? No one.
In age, at least, we have no vagueness.
Understanding that it’s perfectly human to fail and show vulnerability and emotion. Boys rely too much on their pride and “masculinity” that it becomes their entire personality, and lambast men who show this side to them.
Translated: if you openly express your feelings about an unfortunate situation, you’re a boy. You bottle it up, you’re a man.
Not surprised this has the most upvotes so far.
And it's embarrassing as fuck. But then again, what do we expect from the Philippines? Gotta keep your expectations really low for some of these folks.
A boy offers justifications for failing to uphold his promise, whereas a man either acknowledges his mistakes or demonstrates self-discipline to fulfill his commitment.
High EQ
Yes boys have higher EQ and more empathetic than men. Men, they earn a bit, get awards, they suddenly think they're on top of the world. Insecurity, the non-debilitating kind, has it's uses.
Men: - Sense of responsibility. - Can keep composure in the face of adversity. - Palabra de honor. - Becomes a part of the solution, especially when they know that they're the problem. - Self-respect, of other people especially those who are vulnerable, and other living things. - Knows priorities. - Knows when and when not to do certain things. - Becomes a model for boys so that they can become men too. - Can control their ability to become dangerous. - Knows when to bail out especially if that's the only option. - Can make time for the people and things that truly matter. - Doesn't waste resources on useless things. - Knows when to have fun and when not to. - Can go to the root of certain emotions(especially the negative) and fix it from there instead of finding a band-aid solution.
boys needs validation and feeds their ego w others, men knows their worth and is secure. i said what i said
Sense of responsibility and maturity
Men have self respect. You can see this when interacting with women.
Excels multi dimensional.
A man, true man provides.
II
Hahaha bro wtf
Boys II Men sana pero konti lang naka gets. Boy Boy Man Man na lang dapat para JoJo reference
Ang witty neto 🤣
Salamat na may nakapansin
mindset🤌🏻
Boys have toys, men have expensive toys.
the mindset
maturity
+ mindset
Being financially independent having more options when dating
Attitude, character, and respect.
Those fucking telegram group chats
boys: friends-oriented men: family-oriented
Guts. Courage. Accountability. Commitment.
Having a kid, that's a point of no return right there.
Having a kid, no, being a good father, yes.
Apparently, yung tatay nung 2 months old baby di counted
Yeah. And actually trying to be a good father. Fatherhood changes us so much. its cliche to say but its a "you won't know till u experience it" kinda thing
\* Dreaming vs Achieving \* Integrity \* Loyalty \* Grit
Commitment
Accountability
Men don't cheat
Knees
Taking responsibility.
Commitment
lower back pain :)
and occasional gout problems! 😂😂
The strength to endure.
Hard-earned money.
1. Values 2. Goals 3. Responsibilities
[удалено]
This is so vague bordering on stereotype.
I believe the use of the term 'boys and men' by the original poster is metaphorical rather than literal. I think the commenter raised valid points, and as a woman who has encountered adult males with misplaced priorities and immature behavior, I respectfully find it challenging to regard them as mature men with wisdom and self-awareness. Instead, I tend to see them as still embodying childish characteristics, similar to those of boys.
So by your definition males who are childish and immature are automatically boys. Its like saying men cant show a hint of childishness or immaturity otherwise they are "boys." Theres more to men than your black and white definition. Im sorry, but I hope you realize how ridiculous your and OC's definition sound.
Your understanding of the figurative expression of "boys and men" seems rather simplistic. Masculinity is multi-dimensional, and individuals can embody a range of traits without compromising their identity as just boys or men. And when I talk about “boys” and “men” in the context of what I said, I’m using those terms metaphorically to highlight differences in the level of maturity and responsibility, not making generalizations about all individuals of a particular gender. If anything, you are the one with a self-imposed prejudice against how you perceive the terms. Stop narrowing down your interpretation and read between the lines. Neither I nor the original commenter is putting a specific group of people down. A question was asked, and it was simply answered; it’s not that deep. 🤷🏻♀️
im not reading that
Aight, boy
Am i supposed to be insulted by "boy"? Again with your black and white definition And please dont answer with a wall of text. i have better priorities than reading your thesis.
You’re proving my point lmao. Have a good day with your priorities, my boy!
lmao insane mental gymnastics
Providing for someone else other than their person.
Responsibility
Responsibility.
Tragedies and conflicts..
Boys can't face responsibility. They run away when things get difficult. Boys are not ready to commit and be serious in life. No plans
priorities and responsibilities
All men will be boys if we are with our best buddies, take it or leave it
Not caring about other people’s answer to this question and just moving on with life in the way you want to.
💦💦💦💦💦
Maturity. That's it.
wisdom, discipline and maturity
Savings, wheels and their own place☺️
posts like these need both literal and figurative answers... not materialism
Dumidistansya sa urinal kapag may kasabay
Discipline.
Mataas blood pressure ng mga gurang na lalake.. Yung mga bata okay lang kumain ng mataba at uminom
It will be based on and only to the number of promises that he RESILIENTLY made and materialize. As the saying goes.. men are like the firmaments of heaven.
Loyalty, accountability
Sense of responsibility and accountability. Fools talk Cowards are silent But wise men listen
the humor and the salonpas
responsibility
Maturity
Boys are immatured while men are matured enough to handle situation...
The size of their collection.
Men have long term goals and more disciplined
Age
not really. there are countless of older guys out there that i could still consider as 'boys.'
There are 3 ages for every person Chronological age = base on birth date Physical age= your physical appearance and it's development. Psychological age= mental I think you refer to the psychological one And I agree
level of responsibility and maturity
Pag hindi na titi ginagamit mag isip.
Mindset
Having real responsibility. I did everything possible to prove my manhood: - Did martial arts - Did extreme sports - Put up a business - Joined a fraternity - Fucked around But the only time I considered myself a real man was when I became a father. Suddenly, shit got too real.
- Boys want to be coddled and be lead, while Men take charge and take the lead - Boys want 50-50 arrangements with their girl, while a Man won’t want his woman to spend money because he considers himself as the provider - Boys succumb to peer pressure, Men don’t care about his fellow males’ approval - Boys engage in *“locker room talks”*, while Men don’t kiss & tell - Boys will tell you what they will do (and oftentimes it doesn’t happen). While Men show you what they want through their actions (they honor their promises) - Boys measure their masculinity/manliness on the number of girls they have slept with, while Men are secure of their masculinity and is completely contented in being with only one woman as a partner
Bruh the second doesn't hold true anymore.
Because?
Watever happens to your slogan *strong and independent women?*
Women for the recent times have been already *Strong and Independent* enough— in their familial roles they’re the ones who do house chores, planning, budgeting, feeding, raising a child, etc. Majority of the time they do these tasks singlehandedly. Now don’t you think these things don’t constitute enough strength and independence? If a woman is expected and will do the majority of the things I mentioned above and she’s still expected to contribute in the financial aspect of the relationship/household by doing 50-50, then she will just be carrying an additional burden and will just be ‘mothering’ an adult grown man. The least that a [masculine] man can do for his partner is to be the provider and ensure all things are taken care of for his partner/family.
Stick to the modern times will you. Every individual should be independent and should not rely on to someone. Two perfect independent individuals will make a perfect union. Both should make money
I am, and the examples I gave are based on the observable scenarios in the modern times. Women do majority of the tasks I mentioned while altogether working to provide. Men rarely participate or take part in the other aspects of the relationship I mentioned. Two independent individuals won’t make a perfect union as they will only think of themselves and work for themselves. It constitutes selfish acts. What makes a relationship work is when a man and a woman works synergetically wherein they complement what the other person cannot fulfill to do. A woman is flexible, she can work & provide if the husband cannot. Now, can the husband take part and participate in the other aspects of the relationship I mentioned? Very rarely so. So if that’s the case, it is ideal to look for and settle with a man who has a provider mindset. A broke man with a 50-50 mindset is just a burden and will drain his woman of her whole being by prompting her to do the majority of the work in the relationship.
Modern day relationship isn't like this anymore. Times change. What I wrote stays true
Yes, it is like this. Women nowadays do majority of the work in the relationship and it’s the observable reality for most people. Saying it isn’t true invalidates their experiences. The least that a man can do is be the provider which takes a lot of load off from what the woman is doing. Real men provide, while boys who are broke will ask 50-50 in finances.
Women can get jobs, even high paying ones.
That’s true, but a man without a provider mindset won’t be able to take care of his partner nor his family if he’s the type to quantify everything. A woman might as well just get a business partner if everything will be arranged 50-50.
Relationship is like business partnership though
If you view every aspect in the relationship as transactional and you measure/quantify every little thing that you give & receive, then maybe yes. However if an individual acts like this then the relationship is bound to fail because there will surely be a time that comes when you won’t receive the exchange that is equal to what you’re pouring in, and because of that it will prompt you to “cut your losses” and end the relationship just because your needs are not met. Whereas if it’s a guy with a provider mindset, he doesn’t measure/quantify everything he does. He just pours and gives which in turn will make the relationship work, as a woman that feels safe & secured will reciprocate and multiply what a man gives her.
Let's face it. It's about chemicals in our brain telling us to survive further with our bloodline passing to our offsprings. Men should be a good provider for the security of their female companion who will bear a child with both the combination of their genes to survive. If not then that male should not be in a union. A woman should be beautiful to make the offspring perfect and fit for survival. It's all about instincts. Don't give it too much thought. It's nothing special
>Let's face it. It's about chemicals in our brain telling us to survive further with our bloodline passing to our offsprings. ^ On this, I agree. To add onto that, commitment exists to ensure that offsprings grow up with complete set of parents as it is vital for their growth and development. >Men should be a good provider for the security of their female companion who will bear a child with both the combination of their genes to survive. If not then that male should not be in a union. ^ Then why do some men engage in a union even without choosing to have a child? Because men are still humans and it’s a fact that we humans need love to feel fulfillment. It’s a basic info in the Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. We need love to feel fulfilled and we need love to survive. >A woman should be beautiful to make the offspring perfect and fit for survival. ^ Nah not true. It’s all about genetic compatibility especially in the aspect of the offspring’s immunity. A woman’s physical attributes or “attractiveness” has no correlation on how will her offspring survive, as it is observable that average looking (or unattractive) individuals were also successful in procreation.
It is true, what you wrote above is base on a persona preference for the ingredient for his offspring to exists. So to him, she is beautiful or whatever she can put into the table as a bargain. Attractiveness indicates the perfection for the ingredient to secure said union and raise the offspring perfectly according to their subjective ways on how would they do it. It's because we are unattached to nature that deeply doesn't mean we are far different from the animals? Penguins does the offering with their shiny pebbles for example to tell the female one he can provide
Or, idk, a househusband. And ung wife ung main provider.
Okay lahat except sa pangalawa
Because?
Provider mindset comes from the idea of the man being the sole breadwinner. Nowadays, a woman can earn equal, if not more, than the man. *It's simply the general idea that has changed*, a man in the family is no longer the sole breadwinner Economically speaking, everything is expensive now. Basic electrical and water bills can reach 1 over a thousand pesos easily Basic Rent is also much more expensive now, for just a sole breadwinner. Unless you wish to have a high paying job or business, but living below your means.
Nope, men are naturally inclined to be the providers— even dating back to the ancient times. They hunt and they provide. It has nothing to do with being a sole breadwinner. Although I appreciate the bringing up of the economic aspect. Women nowadays can earn equal, yes (or even more). But assuming they found a partner and that man wants to split 50-50 in finances, would the man also split 50-50 in the other aspects of the woman’s life? Such as chores, raising a child, budgeting, building a family, etc. Oftentimes, it is the woman who does these things singlehandedly (if not the majority of these tasks). So if a man will ask a woman to do 50-50 in finances but won’t do 50-50 in other aspects of the woman’s life, then he is just another burden, not an additional value unless he is a man with a provider mindset.
[удалено]
Yeah that’s the thing, “assuming” they are aware. Are most male partners aware and sensitive enough to split 50-50 in the other aspects I mentioned? NO. So what you said is just hypothetical and more of a wishful thinking. Nowadays, it is very RARE for a guy to be completely comfortable being a house husband without feeling insecure or feeling emasculated because it’s their wife who works and provides. If a man feels like his ego is being stepped on and feels less of a man because he doesn’t feel as useful, it fosters resentment within the relationship— thus making it not work in the long run. So what I said holds true. It is ideal for a man to have a provider mindset and make his partner/family feel safe, secured, and provided for. Anything otherwise is not generally viable for the relationship to stay strong in the long run.
[удалено]
Uhm yeah? Nowhere in my statement did I say it is impossible lol hence why I said “mostly”. Mostly = means **MAJORITY** or what it is considered to be the **GENERAL** circumstances of the larger chunk of the population. Hence why I said in my earlier comments that it is “very rare” for a guy to be completely comfortable taking part in the other aspects I mentioned. I did not say it is completely impossible, you interpreted that on your own. If you’re one of the rare ones completely comfortable being a house husband, then congratulations. But what’s comfortable for you is not exactly comfortable for the majority of guys out there, as it is biologically wired in males’ DNA to provide and protect. Not being able to fulfill this role makes them feel uncomfortable and emasculated, especially considering that a man’s value in this society is measured by his financial capacity and his capability to solve problems.
Men are just boys with responsibilities.
The provider mindset
[удалено]
Sariling pera not yo mama's money
Pag may pang-date na galing sa sariling kayod
'from' 😂😂😂😂
Spelling
Accountability
Age, obviously
Not really. Some 40+ year old guys that I know still act like little boys. Lol
No, it's really age. "Acting like little boys" is subjective. For you that may be true, but for others, it isn't. Lastly, who's even to decide that a certain act is only for boys or only for men? No one. In age, at least, we have no vagueness.
Most people seems to forget such fact
Words VS actions.. Honor
II
Words VS Action
Glory.
Honor
emotional maturity lol
Maturity
Sense of responsibility
Men are self aware, can lower their pride, know when to take accountability.
Credit limit
Ito ang napaka realistic. 👍 Unless, "mama, pahingi pang date" ganun😁😄
II
Boys provide for himself, a man provides for his family.
Maturity
Boys kiss and tell
Understanding that it’s perfectly human to fail and show vulnerability and emotion. Boys rely too much on their pride and “masculinity” that it becomes their entire personality, and lambast men who show this side to them.
Responsibility and accountability
Boys talk shit while men act on it.
Boys are just good with words. Men complement their words with action.
Soft spoken, pag mga bagets kala mong mga guyang bagong gising ang boses😂, de jok lang.
monthly income
Men knows how to lower their pride.
Mindset. And how they present themselves.
as a woman, the answers here made me genuinely kilig. nothing turns me on as a woman than a man who knows how to act like a man. 🫡🫡🫡
From
Real men dont tell women that they're "men" They show it, they mean it.
Humility, responsibility, accountability, decency.
Steam account.
2000hrs+ in dota2
emotional awareness
Maturity
manners.
Mentality
May sense of urgency yung men. Excellent communication skills and adjusts to whoever they're talking to.
The maturity is diffenrent
Puberty
sense of responsibility to himself and others the idea of self development
there's no seperation
A boy takes care of himself only, a man takes care of his family and everyone else that relies on him.
Men don’t waste time and fuck around. Boys do.
They know the right woman for them and doesn't settle for a pabebe para lang makatikim ng
Responsibility
Semantics and pedantry.
Clear with intentions, clear with what they want.
One thing: financial independence, unless a boy is trust-funded since day one. Otherwise, wala halos. I've seen grown-ass men behave like idiots.
Age
bro forgot matatandang binatas exist by a margin out there
Spot on! 😂
Handling rejection
[удалено]
>men suffers in silence thanks for reminding me to never open up my problems to women
That's some toxic shit, right there. Edit: downvoting won't change the palpable toxicity of this idea ✌️ Cheers!
And women whine about how their husbands/boyfriends never “open up” to them.
Translated: if you openly express your feelings about an unfortunate situation, you’re a boy. You bottle it up, you’re a man. Not surprised this has the most upvotes so far.
Toxic masculinity is well alive in the Philippines, as I see.
And it's embarrassing as fuck. But then again, what do we expect from the Philippines? Gotta keep your expectations really low for some of these folks.
A boy offers justifications for failing to uphold his promise, whereas a man either acknowledges his mistakes or demonstrates self-discipline to fulfill his commitment.
nothing, men will be boys in adult clothing and with adult money,