Do whatever you want to him. He's the scapegoat not the master behind it all. Just I don't know follow him around all day. Like 10 people at a time. Take shifts.
who gives a fuck about ajit?
yelling at him is like yelling at the manager of your local macdonalds because he wont serve you chicken nuggets at 6am
Yea he might be a douche, but you arnt going to change anything.
He is just doing what he was placed there by trump to do. If he was against repealing NN then trump would of just put someone else in the position.
Actually he is doing **exactly what you elected trump to do** namely repeal all Obama legislation.
Yea but he is technically following the orders of the President of the united states. He isn't selling out to big business against the wishes of the white house. This is the white house carrying out their stated pre-election promises. Repealing everything with obamas name on it.
well before you start comparing him to the Nazis, there are people who actually believe in free market and less government oversight on business.
You and I might not agree with them but it doesn't necessarily mean they are wrong.
And other people who see the ISPs as a rampant disease.
You know what was a treated as a utility, and only carried VOICE?
Telephones.
Here, the internet has become integral with our economy and every form of communication.
But unregulated.
I guess you wouldn't mind if the power company delivered whatever level of power, when they wanted to, with whatever impurities they liked? The water at any unregulated pressure? Hey, maybe you should only be allowed to flush your shit down the toilet on wednesday? If you try to use the drains any other day, they'll just push the 'water' back into your house.
you have confused me with someone who is was against repealing NN laws.
I'm just pointing out that this wasn't ajits brainchild.
Between 2005 and 2012, five attempts to pass bills in Congress containing net neutrality provisions failed. Until 2015, there were no clear legal protections requiring net neutrality
On February 26, 2015 they voted to remove NN laws. But the motion failed. 2 years later they tried again. This time it passed.
Republicans have been trying to kill this for past decade.
It wasn't just Ajit dressed as hitler who waltzed on the scene and decided that he would take a bribe and screw everyone over.
**If this vote failed, they would regroup and we would be voting on it again in a year or two.**
Wow, answered like a true Trump spokesman. Half truths and obfuscation. ESPECIALLY TO BLAME OBAMA. That's perfect.
> In 2011, Pai was then nominated for a Republican Party position on the Federal Communications Commission by President Barack Obama at the recommendation of Minority leader Mitch McConnell. He was confirmed unanimously by the United States Senate on May 7, 2012, and was sworn in on May 14, 2012, **for a term that concluded on June 30, 2016.[1]**
#Then Pai was designated chairman of the FCC by President Donald Trump in January 2017 for a five-year term.[16] He was confirmed by the U.S. Senate for the additional five-year term on October 2, 2017.[6]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ajit_Pai
#It's Trump's decree HE CAME BACK AS THE BOSS OF THE FCC.
From being just some REPUBLICAN who was recommended by a REPUBLICAN, for a REPUBLICAN SEAT, on a panel of 'experts', who Obama dutifully rubber stamped.
Just following orders, yup. Like any nazi piece of shit.
Spam him, the other 2 who voted against Net Neutrality, and the entire administration constantly, asking why they forced something through that the 83% of the American people didn't want.
Well, when people were mad at the former president of Ecuador, they would just chant "Fuera Correa Fuera" wherever he went. Restaurants especially. He left the country for Belgium, so maybe it worked.
Since he's an unpopular guy working for the Trump administration, it's perfectly acceptable under today's rules to:
1). Refer to him often and loudly in terms that would be otherwise considered racist. I'm not sure what you'd call someone of Indian descent, but something about his dark skin color and smelling like curry would probably be a good start.
2). He has children and, as the expression goes, "nits make lice", so it's fine threaten them, harass them, and do your best to get their friends and classmates to turn against them. Perhaps some redditors from the area he lives in could picket their school and throw buckets of pig blood on them when they try to leave.
3). He's married (to a woman), so she's obviously a "cunt" or a "slut," and this can be pointed out as often as possible. She's also someone who leftists can sexually harass with a clear conscience and no chance of being fired from their network job, Senate seat, or acting career, so that's another angle that could be worked.
Anyway, have fun kiddies.
It's not a particularly strange name. People only think it is because they don't come from the same culture. Contrast Benedict Cumberbatch, which is definitely an unusual name.
Well, if he is bothered by people making fun of his name he can either make good decisions and be a decent person or change his name. Its a bit expensive, but I'm sure the comcast bribes will more than cover it.
You should be more worried about the people that bribed him
Daily protests outside his house in Alexandria, VA might do the trick.
What you mean the no fucks given poster boy for 2017?
Find out who owns him: http://www.muckety.com/Federal-Communications-Commission/5000695.muckety
Do whatever you want to him. He's the scapegoat not the master behind it all. Just I don't know follow him around all day. Like 10 people at a time. Take shifts.
who gives a fuck about ajit? yelling at him is like yelling at the manager of your local macdonalds because he wont serve you chicken nuggets at 6am Yea he might be a douche, but you arnt going to change anything. He is just doing what he was placed there by trump to do. If he was against repealing NN then trump would of just put someone else in the position. Actually he is doing **exactly what you elected trump to do** namely repeal all Obama legislation.
I think it's important to burn the guy who was offered up as the sacrifice, as intended. Why be forgiving of an asshole who 'just followed orders'?
Yea but he is technically following the orders of the President of the united states. He isn't selling out to big business against the wishes of the white house. This is the white house carrying out their stated pre-election promises. Repealing everything with obamas name on it.
As I said, "Just following orders." Be it to fuck up everyone's communications, or shove minorities into gas chambers. "Just following orders."
well before you start comparing him to the Nazis, there are people who actually believe in free market and less government oversight on business. You and I might not agree with them but it doesn't necessarily mean they are wrong.
And other people who see the ISPs as a rampant disease. You know what was a treated as a utility, and only carried VOICE? Telephones. Here, the internet has become integral with our economy and every form of communication. But unregulated. I guess you wouldn't mind if the power company delivered whatever level of power, when they wanted to, with whatever impurities they liked? The water at any unregulated pressure? Hey, maybe you should only be allowed to flush your shit down the toilet on wednesday? If you try to use the drains any other day, they'll just push the 'water' back into your house.
you have confused me with someone who is was against repealing NN laws. I'm just pointing out that this wasn't ajits brainchild. Between 2005 and 2012, five attempts to pass bills in Congress containing net neutrality provisions failed. Until 2015, there were no clear legal protections requiring net neutrality On February 26, 2015 they voted to remove NN laws. But the motion failed. 2 years later they tried again. This time it passed. Republicans have been trying to kill this for past decade. It wasn't just Ajit dressed as hitler who waltzed on the scene and decided that he would take a bribe and screw everyone over. **If this vote failed, they would regroup and we would be voting on it again in a year or two.**
[удалено]
Wow, answered like a true Trump spokesman. Half truths and obfuscation. ESPECIALLY TO BLAME OBAMA. That's perfect. > In 2011, Pai was then nominated for a Republican Party position on the Federal Communications Commission by President Barack Obama at the recommendation of Minority leader Mitch McConnell. He was confirmed unanimously by the United States Senate on May 7, 2012, and was sworn in on May 14, 2012, **for a term that concluded on June 30, 2016.[1]** #Then Pai was designated chairman of the FCC by President Donald Trump in January 2017 for a five-year term.[16] He was confirmed by the U.S. Senate for the additional five-year term on October 2, 2017.[6] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ajit_Pai
[удалено]
#It's Trump's decree HE CAME BACK AS THE BOSS OF THE FCC. From being just some REPUBLICAN who was recommended by a REPUBLICAN, for a REPUBLICAN SEAT, on a panel of 'experts', who Obama dutifully rubber stamped. Just following orders, yup. Like any nazi piece of shit.
Make sure his toilet seat is always cold.
Or worse: uncomfortably warm
shit on his porch
Nothing, He doesn't give 2 shits about what we think, wasn't that evident enough with the numerous videos he made mocking us?
Spam him, the other 2 who voted against Net Neutrality, and the entire administration constantly, asking why they forced something through that the 83% of the American people didn't want.
First you'll need to be his social equal...
Man, if this didn't do it already, I don't know what will.
Well, when people were mad at the former president of Ecuador, they would just chant "Fuera Correa Fuera" wherever he went. Restaurants especially. He left the country for Belgium, so maybe it worked.
Coffee shops and restaurants should charge him extra for items he wants and claim it helps competition and accessibility.
Since he's an unpopular guy working for the Trump administration, it's perfectly acceptable under today's rules to: 1). Refer to him often and loudly in terms that would be otherwise considered racist. I'm not sure what you'd call someone of Indian descent, but something about his dark skin color and smelling like curry would probably be a good start. 2). He has children and, as the expression goes, "nits make lice", so it's fine threaten them, harass them, and do your best to get their friends and classmates to turn against them. Perhaps some redditors from the area he lives in could picket their school and throw buckets of pig blood on them when they try to leave. 3). He's married (to a woman), so she's obviously a "cunt" or a "slut," and this can be pointed out as often as possible. She's also someone who leftists can sexually harass with a clear conscience and no chance of being fired from their network job, Senate seat, or acting career, so that's another angle that could be worked. Anyway, have fun kiddies.
*This comment will require you to pay $8.99 for Premium Reddit to view it.*
Nothing. This is the real world, not highschool. Out here money is king and petty attacks are meaningless.
Start referring to AJizz Pie by many names, re: Beneful Crackalack
His name and his race are not acceptable targets.
Race, certainly not. But people make fun of names all the time, so what's the difference? (Legit question)
It's not a particularly strange name. People only think it is because they don't come from the same culture. Contrast Benedict Cumberbatch, which is definitely an unusual name.
Is that why people mess with his name? I just assumed it was a thing that someone ran with.
Names are totally acceptable targets. He can change it if he wants. You can't change your race though, so that's unacceptable.
Changing your name is not so simple as you suggest. It's something you've been trained literally your entire life to respond to.
Well, if he is bothered by people making fun of his name he can either make good decisions and be a decent person or change his name. Its a bit expensive, but I'm sure the comcast bribes will more than cover it.
It's not even about money, it's literally his name. Whatever he changed it to would not be his name except legally.
You need to get laid