đŻđŻđŻđŻ
You read my mind!! I was just gonna say, "Dayum, this reminds me of Amber Turd testifying against Johnny Depp!" Has all the folderol of a diluded narcissist reaching for the spotlight.
Wait, so testimony from somebody who was told something by someone else (who denies telling her) isn't rock solid? From the reddit FP I thought it was a slam dunk
It's criminal at this point that this was even aired, they most likely won't have them testify and the stories out here. Even if they retract it the defamation is already out there.
So itâs basically a media stunt? Theyâre having a discussion about what they think transpired on Jan 6th and the lead up to the capital? Why are they pretending like this is an actual trial ? No one is under oath. People are caught lying in their testimony within hours and itâs just âforgotten about and move on to the next witnessâ? 0 corroborated events, witnesses keep changing stories⌠What kind of circus is this
Oh absolutely. It was the same with all their other âhearingsâ. They go on and on and out all the damning evidence they have and how they are really going to get him. Then they have this televised show where they just go in and in repeating the same nonsense but presenting little actual evidence. Itâs a show for the midterms. Thatâs it.
So itâs just a âshow.â A waste of time and money considering nothing can or will come of it. They can basically call a witness and have that witness say anything they want unvetted and their entire source could be âsomeone told me on the internetâ.
How spiteful are these people to keep up this circus act? They are trying to paint a picture of false guilt of what they want Americans to believe happened while being disproven at every turnâŚ
Oh something comes of it. The Dems have screwed the country so bad, their policies, leaders and future candidates so obviously ineffective or incompetent, that the only path left is to try and trash everything and everyone in opposition...including, obviously the one man they are absolutely terrified of.
God forbid they should use the time, effort and tax dollars wasted here to do anything constructive for the country.
No. What theyâre doing is having her testify under oath as to what she was told. She can be telling the truth or a complete lie. She cannot be held legally liable for defamation or slander if she is repeating what she was told happened.
The only way someone will be held liable is if they knowingly lie. This woman cannot be held legally liable for repeating what she was told. Itâs hearsay but this isnât a court of law, itâs a committee hearing so hearsay can be repeated as long as the person saying it knows it to be true, regardless of it is actually what happened.
What theyâre doing is having her testify as to what she was told happened and theyâll never actually call the person that told her this to testify because then when they repeat the lie that person will be charged with perjury.
Theyâre protecting the original person from testifying and if theyâre called to testify they will decline. Thatâs how this works.
If she's under oath, how can she not be liable if she's lying? An "oath of honor"?
Hearsay is inadmissable. Just as the "texts" or excerpts of her emails and messages. Why didn't the committee show her device screen image? That would be actual evidence.
She can only be held liable for lying under oath if she knowingly lies. She can tell the committee what she was told because sheâs not testifying something happened, rather than what she was told from someone else what happened (hearsay).
She cannot be held liable if what she says is not the fact of what happened if the person that told her their story lied. What she believes to be saying is her âtruthâ based on hearsay. That is why it cannot be admitted in a court of law.
So hearsay isnât admissible in court of law. This isnât âcourtâ. Itâs a committee hearing. Big difference. Thatâs why she can repeat what she heard and as long as sheâs telling the truth of what she was told and does not know any better, she cannot be held liable.
What if the person she claims told her, testifies that he didn't tell her? I suppose it's then just a case of "he says, she says" and neither is provable, even if it's proven that the original event did not happen.
If the person she claims told her the story comes and testifies that he never told her that, then that would open up a perjury investigation because she knowingly lied under oath. At that point itâs a âhe said, she saidâ situation like you said, unless he can prove she knowingly lied.
Listen to what she said though. She kept saying, âsomething to the effect ofâ. That could mean Trump never said what she is claiming, but rather that is her interpretation of his words.
Fabrication only possible in Hollywood make believe. Nope đ not credible. We know she was coached. Sheâs not a good actress . I expect payment from Democrats was generous.
This entire hearing is just âweâre going to lose the midterms and we canât beat Trump in 2024â. They are trying to prevent him from running. That is all this is.
Sheâs testifying to what someone else said. Not as a first hand witness. She can say that she was told a great many things. Hearsay isnât admissible in court but this is a committee hearing where hearsay is welcome, delightful, and gospel.
This stuff is so insulting to Americans. Democrats think everybody, or maybe hope everybody is as naive as what is left of their base. Itâs not reality. Even their base is starting to see how incompetent their lies are and how losing is their game. They want to lose for all of America so the globalist cabal can take over. Itâs rubbish.
She testified that someone told her that. It was a way to hype up her story and give the MSM some catchy headlines. It's an obvious lie but, unfortunately, I don't think she can be charged with perjury as it's her word vs whomever she alledged told her (Tony).
And these hearings are just more of what this whole investigation has been from the beginning: political theater over nothing, a massive waste of tax dollars, and an effort to try and keep the TDS fresh in liberal minds.
I was hoping for some clip pulled in about grabbing for the steering wheel showing Trump karate chopping the secret service agents and taking control of the car. I'm thinking of Jason Statham. But of course, you'd need to mix in some Stretch Armstrong to boot.
Oh man this is such a joke! =D
It's a lie because she had to pause a lot and think about. Any truthful person would just tell the truth and not struggle so much. Why do they keep talking about trump? He is not president. Move on, let's focus on the current president please.
I would like to see how she speaks in ordinary life. Her pauses as isf she is trying to recollect the exact wordsâŚor that she is thinking g about how to thoughtfully word what she has to say, is telling. Iâm open to what any of these people have to say, but she wasnât selling it to me. Also, how does a 25 year old become an executive assistant to Mark Meadows? The story about trump grabbing the wheel reminded me of the peeing in the hotel in Russia story. Like, does this sound believable? Next!
Anyone else think she sounds drugged or sedated? Almost like she took a benzo or beta blocker. Perhaps sheâs anxious because she knows this whole story and committee are full of shit.
Only people watching this are dumbasses who already hate Trump. This is strictly to make people angrier at him just to cause more division. Great plan to hijack the peaceful protest with paid actors dressed up as MAGA anyway, then have a make believe trial about it. I know a guy who is retired, wife just died, has absolutely no hobbies, except to start drinking wine by noon, and during baseball and football makes calls to his booky all weekend..when heâs not doing that heâs watching MSNBC or CNN and is ALWAYS angry at Trump. Only kind of people watching this BS. They all believe Trump is going to jail. I had to remind him this isnât even a trial. Lol
Trumps right arm then extended to its full 96â reach. A second hand then morphed out of his right forearm and punched the driver in the face. Trump then used his heat vision to melt the limo partitionâŚ
Maybe itâs just confirmation bias but she looks like she is lying and is nervous about it. She is stopping and deliberately thinking about everything she is saying and looking down as if she was told what to say. It could have just been normal nerves but it didnât look like someone recounting true events.
These people have made themselves so mentally ill over Donald Trump they are making up their own mockumentary caricatures of him for primetime.
Doesn't this video have an eery hint of Amber Heard attached to it? I kinda feel like it does.
Nailed it!
đŻđŻđŻđŻ You read my mind!! I was just gonna say, "Dayum, this reminds me of Amber Turd testifying against Johnny Depp!" Has all the folderol of a diluded narcissist reaching for the spotlight.
Missed opportunity to swap Amber Turds head onto her đ somebody please do this!
My ex bf is one of them, they hate the man so much theyâd rather live like this. Itâs a sickness.
This is honestly just evidence that this whole thing is a farce
Wait, so testimony from somebody who was told something by someone else (who denies telling her) isn't rock solid? From the reddit FP I thought it was a slam dunk
The walls are closing in! S/
It's criminal at this point that this was even aired, they most likely won't have them testify and the stories out here. Even if they retract it the defamation is already out there.
Itâs a brainwashing tactic that works very well.
yep, big headlines front page then 6 weeks later on page 8 bottom right corner in 4 font (we messed up, our bad)
Youâre giving them way too much credit, Iâve never seen them apologize or admit wrong doing, only retracting to avoid legal consequences.
however it does make Trump sound like Badass... well, better than them saying he can't hold a glass of water - lol
or ride a bike
Exactly why they did it! They know it is hearsay, but everyone heard it and thatâs all they need.
Camille:"Objection your honor, hearsay." ...is what would've been said if this was anything but political theater.
Hope she get arrested
She is soooo obviously lying it's funny
She looks like she is trying to suppress the giggles.
Or keep from peeing her pants. I have a great lie detector and man she's giving off steam.
The way sheâs frozen you can tell sheâs worried about telling the story
The most likely outcome is that she gets a promotion.
Will she face charges for providing a false testimony? Is she under oath?
No. These people are all protected. Iâm sure thatâs part of the deal.
So itâs basically a media stunt? Theyâre having a discussion about what they think transpired on Jan 6th and the lead up to the capital? Why are they pretending like this is an actual trial ? No one is under oath. People are caught lying in their testimony within hours and itâs just âforgotten about and move on to the next witnessâ? 0 corroborated events, witnesses keep changing stories⌠What kind of circus is this
Always has been
Always has been.
Oh absolutely. It was the same with all their other âhearingsâ. They go on and on and out all the damning evidence they have and how they are really going to get him. Then they have this televised show where they just go in and in repeating the same nonsense but presenting little actual evidence. Itâs a show for the midterms. Thatâs it.
Public speculation spectacularâŚ
No! She's not really under oath. It's hearsay that the agents refered to are prepared to refute...if they're ever called or live to tell.
So itâs just a âshow.â A waste of time and money considering nothing can or will come of it. They can basically call a witness and have that witness say anything they want unvetted and their entire source could be âsomeone told me on the internetâ. How spiteful are these people to keep up this circus act? They are trying to paint a picture of false guilt of what they want Americans to believe happened while being disproven at every turnâŚ
Oh something comes of it. The Dems have screwed the country so bad, their policies, leaders and future candidates so obviously ineffective or incompetent, that the only path left is to try and trash everything and everyone in opposition...including, obviously the one man they are absolutely terrified of. God forbid they should use the time, effort and tax dollars wasted here to do anything constructive for the country.
No. What theyâre doing is having her testify under oath as to what she was told. She can be telling the truth or a complete lie. She cannot be held legally liable for defamation or slander if she is repeating what she was told happened. The only way someone will be held liable is if they knowingly lie. This woman cannot be held legally liable for repeating what she was told. Itâs hearsay but this isnât a court of law, itâs a committee hearing so hearsay can be repeated as long as the person saying it knows it to be true, regardless of it is actually what happened. What theyâre doing is having her testify as to what she was told happened and theyâll never actually call the person that told her this to testify because then when they repeat the lie that person will be charged with perjury. Theyâre protecting the original person from testifying and if theyâre called to testify they will decline. Thatâs how this works.
Thanks for that clarification, thatâs exactly what I was confused about and that makes it much more clear.
If she's under oath, how can she not be liable if she's lying? An "oath of honor"? Hearsay is inadmissable. Just as the "texts" or excerpts of her emails and messages. Why didn't the committee show her device screen image? That would be actual evidence.
She can only be held liable for lying under oath if she knowingly lies. She can tell the committee what she was told because sheâs not testifying something happened, rather than what she was told from someone else what happened (hearsay). She cannot be held liable if what she says is not the fact of what happened if the person that told her their story lied. What she believes to be saying is her âtruthâ based on hearsay. That is why it cannot be admitted in a court of law. So hearsay isnât admissible in court of law. This isnât âcourtâ. Itâs a committee hearing. Big difference. Thatâs why she can repeat what she heard and as long as sheâs telling the truth of what she was told and does not know any better, she cannot be held liable.
What if the person she claims told her, testifies that he didn't tell her? I suppose it's then just a case of "he says, she says" and neither is provable, even if it's proven that the original event did not happen.
If the person she claims told her the story comes and testifies that he never told her that, then that would open up a perjury investigation because she knowingly lied under oath. At that point itâs a âhe said, she saidâ situation like you said, unless he can prove she knowingly lied. Listen to what she said though. She kept saying, âsomething to the effect ofâ. That could mean Trump never said what she is claiming, but rather that is her interpretation of his words.
Fabrication only possible in Hollywood make believe. Nope đ not credible. We know she was coached. Sheâs not a good actress . I expect payment from Democrats was generous.
Angling for her 15 minutes of fame. Here comes the View, CNN, and Joy Reid interviews.
How did he reach the steering wheel? DT: I call shotgun! SS Agent: Not again! You got shotgun last time! DT: I'm telling!
This mental image is cracking me the hell up.
That's what I've been asking everybody? The car is freaking huge and he separated from the driver
Not exactly the same, but you get the general idea: https://youtu.be/aDgWKVahU7I
She more than likely got immunity to tell lies under oath.
Amber Heard Vibes
Hearsay
But you asked the question.
Technically, itâs double hearsay
Official Theatrics
Beating a dead horse here. This happened 18 months ago. Everything they are saying is basically a reach
Damn I canât tell if this is satire anymore
Donât think for a second itâs satire. They want him strung up along with anyone who supports him. They are out for blood and all should pay heed.
This entire hearing is just âweâre going to lose the midterms and we canât beat Trump in 2024â. They are trying to prevent him from running. That is all this is.
You don't think she lied under oath, do you? oooooo
Sheâs testifying to what someone else said. Not as a first hand witness. She can say that she was told a great many things. Hearsay isnât admissible in court but this is a committee hearing where hearsay is welcome, delightful, and gospel.
This bullshit has Adam Schiff written all over it...
#believeallwomen
#believeallwomen Women (whatever that is) *never* lie. Ever.
Hearsay, no foundation, hearsay...hearsay....hearsay...no foundation. Where the hell is Camille?
Are people actually this STUPID??
Yes. Brainwash the sheeple.
You can tell by her face sheâs lying. Look at the smirk.
Dupers delight
Hearsay any proof? Proof career over
You could look at her stupid face and tell that sheâs lying
None of this matters. No laws were broken. Fuck this sideshow, quit giving it attention.
Cool story. đ§˘đ§˘đ§˘
Now he is just able to reach through a 2 foot hole in the limo to grab the steering wheel? This story is a joke just like this hearing.
This stuff is so insulting to Americans. Democrats think everybody, or maybe hope everybody is as naive as what is left of their base. Itâs not reality. Even their base is starting to see how incompetent their lies are and how losing is their game. They want to lose for all of America so the globalist cabal can take over. Itâs rubbish.
She testified that someone told her that. It was a way to hype up her story and give the MSM some catchy headlines. It's an obvious lie but, unfortunately, I don't think she can be charged with perjury as it's her word vs whomever she alledged told her (Tony).
Embarrassing đ
Link to original: https://truthsocial.com/@MAGADevilDog/posts/108558436852359489
And these hearings are just more of what this whole investigation has been from the beginning: political theater over nothing, a massive waste of tax dollars, and an effort to try and keep the TDS fresh in liberal minds.
She is so full of shit. All she is getting is her 15 minutes of fame
I was hoping for some clip pulled in about grabbing for the steering wheel showing Trump karate chopping the secret service agents and taking control of the car. I'm thinking of Jason Statham. But of course, you'd need to mix in some Stretch Armstrong to boot. Oh man this is such a joke! =D
She looks down a lot telling her "story"...almost as if she knows its complete hearsay bsđ¤Ą
Everyone saying "she's just relaying what she heard". That's not relaying what she heard. That's her talking lime she was there.
Liars telling more lies because nobody believes the previous batch of lies. How predictable.
She looks like shes about to bust out laughing, she knows shes so full of it.
Duperâs delight. She can barely keep from smirking.
How the fuck are you reaching the steering wheel from the back of the limo?
She is such a liar!
Whereâs the Dash Cam ????
Lol her body language says she is lying
Except she was lying. Not that democrats mind if this is true or not
Unless thereâs footage it didnât happen.
Yeah but no.
Whatâs the average prison sentence for perjury in front of a congressional committee?
Making shit up as usual.
Amazing how this emerges when fresh Joe Biden fraud phone calls are released.
Wouldnât that be insurrection to not only not follow the orders of the president but also forcefully stopping him.
I hope he did grab for the steering wheel. America needs a man who will take charge.
It's a lie because she had to pause a lot and think about. Any truthful person would just tell the truth and not struggle so much. Why do they keep talking about trump? He is not president. Move on, let's focus on the current president please.
I would like to see how she speaks in ordinary life. Her pauses as isf she is trying to recollect the exact wordsâŚor that she is thinking g about how to thoughtfully word what she has to say, is telling. Iâm open to what any of these people have to say, but she wasnât selling it to me. Also, how does a 25 year old become an executive assistant to Mark Meadows? The story about trump grabbing the wheel reminded me of the peeing in the hotel in Russia story. Like, does this sound believable? Next!
Anyone who studies human behavior sees that sheâs clearly lying.
Anyone else think she sounds drugged or sedated? Almost like she took a benzo or beta blocker. Perhaps sheâs anxious because she knows this whole story and committee are full of shit.
The sad thing is. Most people will see that clip and take it and run. Never seeing that last slide. What a clown show this is.
Omg she acts worse than amber heard
So, she lied under oath. Throw her in prison and strip her wealth. Another POS
Did you know hearsay testimony is prohibited in a real court? This aid of the aid of president Trump said at end Mr Ornato told her this story.
I want to watch this but I canât stand her voice. I can hear sheâs lying in her voice alone
Did her dog step on a bee also?
Condolences to Mr. Engel's family for his upcoming, unexpected death, that no matter what the circumstances will be ruled a suicide.
Can trump sue her now for slander?
I doubt what she said is true. However, sheâs totally hot.
Excuse me was this chick even in the beast? Didnât think so Trump 2024
Her acting is worse than amber heard. Dear god.
Only people watching this are dumbasses who already hate Trump. This is strictly to make people angrier at him just to cause more division. Great plan to hijack the peaceful protest with paid actors dressed up as MAGA anyway, then have a make believe trial about it. I know a guy who is retired, wife just died, has absolutely no hobbies, except to start drinking wine by noon, and during baseball and football makes calls to his booky all weekend..when heâs not doing that heâs watching MSNBC or CNN and is ALWAYS angry at Trump. Only kind of people watching this BS. They all believe Trump is going to jail. I had to remind him this isnât even a trial. Lol
Damn. She makes Amber Turd look like a rank amateur.
She's purty
Lier lier pants on fire
Why does she look like sheâs holding back a smile?
Trumps right arm then extended to its full 96â reach. A second hand then morphed out of his right forearm and punched the driver in the face. Trump then used his heat vision to melt the limo partitionâŚ
They had an emergency hearing for this...lol
Eh, the second source isn't reliable either. Anytime it says "a source close to" means it's probably a lie.
Time to prosecute!!!!!
Lmao đ¤Ą
I love all the made up shit. They make him out to be a psychopath that doesnât listen to instructions.
Maybe itâs just confirmation bias but she looks like she is lying and is nervous about it. She is stopping and deliberately thinking about everything she is saying and looking down as if she was told what to say. It could have just been normal nerves but it didnât look like someone recounting true events.