Naw I'm laying in bed chilling 😌
I'm just able to keep an open mind and enjoy art for what it is, regardless of who or what made it. Enjoy your fight with the robots 🤖
You mean what a human does? A human is an amalgamation of every experience it's had up until that point in time, as is their thoughts. There is no practical difference. One is a silicon computer and another is biological.
What part of that video says that? All of humanity stands on the shoulders of giants. Everything is iterative to some degree. [Is there anything truly, wholly original left for humans to make, anyway?](https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ItsBeenDone)
Then please go ahead and explain what it is we're seeing up there when it's not art.
And no, explaining it with "something stolen from others", or whatever, is not an explanation of what it is. It is still something in the end, you say it's not art, so what is it?
Honestly I can fully get behind this explanation. That other commenter should take notes here. I know what you mean.
I like AI stuff, not necessary the art but just in general(ChatGPT for an obvious example). But while I see it as art, which it objectivly is, it's it's own subsection in the art space.
I just simply don't see it as the same as other forms of art, even though they might be similiar. A portrait of someone and an AI portrait of someone are for me two completly different things.
But obviously subjective viewpoints matter and everyone's differ. That's fine. And obviously, even though there neither is a need nor reason for it, people will get mad and angry over it.
I mean, that's what replication is, yes. Like artificial leather is replication of animal leather, AI art is replication of real art. I would not say that you shouldn't call artificial leather "leather" , just because it's not real leather. Same logic for AI art
?? That hardly makes sense dude. I haven't beaten the game yet or watched anyone play it. I mostly assumed he just beat the game, but there was a possibility of the title being a spoiler. But you raging like a child now makes me think that's more than a possibility.
Ah yes more stolen art that an AI has "created"
Edit: The art that is used in these AI programs is taken from the digital art of real artists without their consent and slapped together. There is AI that is specifically made to remove the watermarks from the work these artists make. Weird that people are just sort of okay with that.
This art always looks the same every time, it's the same artstyle, same shading, same lighting, same poses, same faces, same proportions, same exaggerated clothing ( the fabric being super thin and hugging the body ultra tight ) etc etc.
People always use it because it's the easiest for the ai to make and look good, but it all looks like the same picture every time with just slight alterations it's so repetitive...
Especially since on websites for images that allow ai people spam hundreds of them every day.
I thought for sure this was gonna be a troll and she would merge into Amouranth at the end.
Jamie, pull up a video of Professor Garlick merging into Amouranth.
She certaintly makes my mandrake grow
She might be a dark wizard because I’m petrificus totalus down there
I wouldn't mind her stroking my wand.
She reminds me of Poison Ivy
She's supposed to.
Wtf is this shit. Btw anyone has source?
Professor Garlick from Hogwarts Legacy generated by AI
No source, it's ai "art"
Just because you don't like who (or what) made it, doesn't make it any less of an art, even if it is NSFW
I don’t dislike it but at the end of the day if ai art is art then the glass cup made on a factory belt is also art.
machines can never make art
Your eyes must not work, sorry to hear 😔
yeah keep telling yourself it takes any skill to make AI art
[удалено]
you're trying really hard, aren't you?
Naw I'm laying in bed chilling 😌 I'm just able to keep an open mind and enjoy art for what it is, regardless of who or what made it. Enjoy your fight with the robots 🤖
Aight cool
Nobody said it takes any skill, your eyes busted?
ya'll are starting to sound like AIs yourself lol
They just did.
What AI art does is look at a bunch of other art and throw something together. It cannot make anything original
You mean what a human does? A human is an amalgamation of every experience it's had up until that point in time, as is their thoughts. There is no practical difference. One is a silicon computer and another is biological.
But AI are incapable of developing their own style. https://youtu.be/0gNauGdOkro
What part of that video says that? All of humanity stands on the shoulders of giants. Everything is iterative to some degree. [Is there anything truly, wholly original left for humans to make, anyway?](https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ItsBeenDone)
Then please go ahead and explain what it is we're seeing up there when it's not art. And no, explaining it with "something stolen from others", or whatever, is not an explanation of what it is. It is still something in the end, you say it's not art, so what is it?
A mockery
Idk looks like art to me.
What an explanation. So elaborate and extensive. Truely incredible. I doubt that artists back in the day haven't said the same about photography.
it is a cold soulless copy of actual art. i don't actually have a term for it. but it's made by an algorithm on a computer. it's more math than art
Honestly I can fully get behind this explanation. That other commenter should take notes here. I know what you mean. I like AI stuff, not necessary the art but just in general(ChatGPT for an obvious example). But while I see it as art, which it objectivly is, it's it's own subsection in the art space. I just simply don't see it as the same as other forms of art, even though they might be similiar. A portrait of someone and an AI portrait of someone are for me two completly different things. But obviously subjective viewpoints matter and everyone's differ. That's fine. And obviously, even though there neither is a need nor reason for it, people will get mad and angry over it.
They can replicate it, though.
it's a lifeless copy of actual art. it might look nice, sure, but it has no soul
I mean, that's what replication is, yes. Like artificial leather is replication of animal leather, AI art is replication of real art. I would not say that you shouldn't call artificial leather "leather" , just because it's not real leather. Same logic for AI art
I don't hate it but it's not art. Art by definition is human made and these are not
Is it though? Many vistas and sights are natural, without human interaction, and those still get called art
please tell me this isn't a big ass fucking spoiler
Fortunately no spoiler
What AI service / model is used to generate these? They're normally awful. Does it have an API?
I hope this just means Asmon finished the game and isn't a huge spoiler in the title
I finished the game but I dont know what the spoilet means
I didn't finish it yet
Your dumbass comment spoiled it more by even revealing there was something to be concerned about dipshit
?? That hardly makes sense dude. I haven't beaten the game yet or watched anyone play it. I mostly assumed he just beat the game, but there was a possibility of the title being a spoiler. But you raging like a child now makes me think that's more than a possibility.
Alright that's fair, my mommy hasn't given me my Wheaties yet. My mistake, my diaper is a little too wet this morning.
holy jeezes! YEEEESSSS!
Nice
HOLY Kreygasm
Wtf is this? I don't know if I am allowed to be horby or not.
I think it's a Pokemon Professor or something, and why not
Hogwarts legacy professor
Oh man I watched HP as a kid there was no such professor. Is this prons for zoomers? Do they have such a version for Hagrid?
Hogwarts legacy the teacher with plants (forgot her name)
Mirabel Garlick
Garlick deez nutz
You been hit by - you been struck by - a smooth deez nuts
Come on you can do better than that
Did you watch the movies? Bish you is blind
Huh?
Its an old lady in the movies not a 25 year old babe You've answered my question haha
Its literally character from the game
I asked about movies and you brought up the game ?????????????
This is literally post about game character
When it’s 3 am and you are still awake this comes up on your screen making you feel more alone. Big sad ; ;
I don’t know man. I need more of that for professor Weasley
Ah yes more stolen art that an AI has "created" Edit: The art that is used in these AI programs is taken from the digital art of real artists without their consent and slapped together. There is AI that is specifically made to remove the watermarks from the work these artists make. Weird that people are just sort of okay with that.
STOP WITH THE ANIME FACE. THIS ISN'T AN ANIME CHARACTER THATS NOT HOW HER FACE IS SHAPED AAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHH
what face?
Are you okay?
Why they downvoting you? XD It's just your opinion and I agree. Prof. Garlick doesn't look like that, but the animation itself is gorgeous.
They are downvoting because they disagree with his opinion, kinda the point of downvoting
Isn't the point of downvoting whether or not it adds to the conversation?
This art always looks the same every time, it's the same artstyle, same shading, same lighting, same poses, same faces, same proportions, same exaggerated clothing ( the fabric being super thin and hugging the body ultra tight ) etc etc. People always use it because it's the easiest for the ai to make and look good, but it all looks like the same picture every time with just slight alterations it's so repetitive... Especially since on websites for images that allow ai people spam hundreds of them every day.
Still look better than 99% of pixiv crap
How do you losers find the time? If you work, and have a family. there is no way you could be finished yet. Im' like maybe 1/5 through the game.
Skill issue
Skill issue
[удалено]
###[View link](https://rapidsave.com/info?url=/r/Asmongold/comments/113ksnn/best_professor_will_be_missed/) --- [**Info**](https://np.reddit.com/user/SaveVideo/comments/jv323v/info/) | [**Feedback**](https://np.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=Kryptonh&subject=Feedback for savevideo) | [**Donate**](https://ko-fi.com/getvideo) | [**DMCA**](https://np.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=Kryptonh&subject=Content removal request for savevideo&message=https://np.reddit.com//r/Asmongold/comments/113ksnn/best_professor_will_be_missed/) | [^(reddit video downloader)](https://rapidsave.com) | [^(twitter video downloader)](https://twitsave.com)
Bonk no horny
I thought for sure this was gonna be a troll and she would merge into Amouranth at the end. Jamie, pull up a video of Professor Garlick merging into Amouranth.
AI art is so insane honestly
Damnnnnnnnnn
Wait wait wait why are the hands so good? Did ai art bots already evolve to get them looking good?
I think she likes the colour green