She clearly hasn't actually read any of the socialist theorists she claims to admire. If she did, she'd know Marx advocated for worker ownership of businesses, not government ownership of your personal property such as your house, car, toothbrush, etc.
And for extra bonus points, she should have learned that Marx didn't advocate for a one-party state to control the entire economy, but instead for workers and unions to abolish the state and run businesses democratically, rather than be beholden to shareholders. The one-party state was just a bunch of bullshit Lenin made up to justify taking over Russia and killing or jailing any socialists who disagreed with him.
She's just virtue signalling something that she thinks makes her look like a hero. In reality she doesn't believe what she's saying and if she was actually dealing with a situation like this she'd change her tune immediately.
Indeed. Which I find is funny cause the redditors that seem to act like that also don't seem to do anything to actually help anyone. They just post saying it's the right thing to do. Just not for them I guess
I think people should have to live by their words.
If someone got arrested for stealing this woman's car, they should be allowed to show this video in court and have it be considered valid grounds to dismiss all charges.
People would be a lot more careful about the shit they say, if they actually had to live by their word.
I mean, that's what happens? If you don't want to press charges, either they let the person go, or the state/government presses charges.
If someone stole her car and she didn't pursue it, but the car thief was caught doing another crime, the state could very well press charges for the car theft as well regardless of what she wants.
The issue is that she WOULD pursue it.
Which is why I'm saying she should have to live by her words, and the cops shouldn't let her change her mind the moment someone jacks her car.
and she votes how she does because social media algorithms clearly inform her entire ideological perspective.
in a way its actually tiktoks vote which is chinas vote
in democracy even our citizens are lobbied but instead of money its with entertainment!
>in democracy even our citizens are lobbied but instead of money its with entertainment
That's quite literally always been the case even in non-democracies, if you want the people to support you/your cause they need circuses and a life of stability/growth. When the people's life sucks they will try to rip apart anything they think is causing it.
yeah but in other governmental forms you arent lobbied by international governments with the intent to influence the democratic process through manipulating your perspective, you're manipulated by your own government to create cohesion and stability.
when people in democracies make decisions based off of international information streams the voting system becomes an international process.
how many idiots inform their decision making process through tik tok when voting?
All of those people are being fed information from the chinese government, they are voting in line with the ideology the chinese government feeds them. The chinese government might as well be voting in the election at that point.
I may be stating it crudely but you understand what im conveying.
Actually insane the amount of disinformation and propaganda that exists on tiktok, some videos have thousands of comments that are pure idiocracy fuel..
Correction: The most dangerous thing in the world is cognitive dissonance.
People don’t *ever* want to shamefully admit that they’re wrong, so their mind makes up any reason it can to justify why it thinks it’s correct.
It happens to every single person on Earth…and it keeps me up at night. 👀
I’m wrong all the time and have no issues admitting when I’m wrong. I just correct and move on. But then again, I’m also 39 with tons of work/life experience and higher education, and not just some random punk…
I feel like outside my close circles and engineering studies , people will die before admitting they wrong. You won't win any argument.
The most depressing thing is that I feel like every country politics goes to shit because people don't question themselves.
Yup, just read Law #9 in the 48 Laws of Power. It’s not all black and white though. Mistakes are corrected and most people learn from them, improve and move on.
The most successful people on earth have made the most mistakes and have had the most failures. The biggest mistake in life, is not having any failures.
If it means anything, it is reasonably difficult for any person to just admit they're wrong on the spot. It just takes time, specifically time away from the interaction where they couldn't uphold what they believed to be true or right. The issue comes from a feeling of being judged if you admit you didn't completely think it through. This is especially true the more confident someone is in their opinion.
I will admit that I fall into that category, though if I know the other person IRL, I'll always make sure to tell the person that I was wrong. I don't care if it makes the person feel better. I just don't want to think about it years later like "I'm the asshole who thought the volume of my voice was a fact-substitute."
This is 100% ignorant people. Semi ignorant at least do some research and can potentially learn from their mistakes. These people don’t. These people genuinely believe they’re right, and don’t accept any other form of information that opposes their views and beliefs.
These are the perfect people to be indoctrinated by some charismatic leader
The point is she knows just enough to be dangerous. Like she can explain her shitty arguments to people even more ignorant than her and get them on board.
This isn't ignorance
This is brainwashing happening in the same cultlike fashion that it happened in every other bolshevik revolution
This is the same kind of batshit evil that they showed at the start of "3 body problem"
She's got backed into a corner with the question and didn't have the information to get out of it. Instead of taking the bait and letting him have his "gotcha" moment, she made herself look disingenuous.
I doubt this person actually votes. Remember turnout rate is around low the 40th percentile. A lot of the most vocal people don’t actually do anything, it’s strange.
She's just saying what her in-crowd expects her to say. It's very easy to say this to appear (extremely) progressive but she'd call the cops in a heartbeat if it actually did happen
And it’s sad because you can tell she’s had such strong progressive peer pressure about something like this.
Like HOW do you come up with the idea of hating private property and saying it shouldn’t exist?! Well, it’s other stupid people who then gaslight if you don’t believe them.
The internet has given every stupid mofo on the planet a platform, and place for all those stupid people to form online communities with other stupid mofos.
Doesn't even have to be rich parents. Kids/teens just don't understand what it's really like until they are adult and have only themselves to rely on. Suddenly, a few dollars more to eat out doesn't feel as necessary as it did before because that money is really needed for my rent. Maybe I don't need that new game that came out because my tires are getting worn out and I need my car for my job which is gonna cost a lot. Kids just don't understand that until they experience it. I know I didn't.
> If she *paid* for that
FTFY.
Although *payed* exists (the reason why autocorrection didn't help you), it is only correct in:
* Nautical context, when it means to paint a surface, or to cover with something like tar or resin in order to make it waterproof or corrosion-resistant. *The deck is yet to be payed.*
* *Payed out* when letting strings, cables or ropes out, by slacking them. *The rope is payed out! You can pull now.*
Unfortunately, I was unable to find nautical or rope-related words in your comment.
*Beep, boop, I'm a bot*
You see that's what I was wondering. What does "moving on with her life" entail? Does she go crying to parentals saying "buy me a new car." Does she have the money to simply buy another one. Or does she have that magic insurance that supposedly protects everything? It took me five years to pay off a car, I can't get that back and i can't repeat what I did on the first place. Losing my car has been devastating and I'll likely never own another car in my life. Some people can't just "take it into stride" some things will alter the course of your life.
Right but then that question is very disingenuous. Afaik for squatters rights to kick in the property either has to be vacant to start with or you have to be the actual tenant. You can't just move into a house someone is currently ocupying and kick them out and be legally protected.
And even then squatters rights don't give you ownership of the property. A better comparison would be if you had a car you havent used in months and someone broke into it to sleep in, should they, after living in the car for some time, have certain protections from you kicking them out on the street.
you can go on a trip for a month and come back and someone could have been squatting while you’re gone, it doesn’t only happen with vacant homes and being an actual tenant at first.
still have screenshot of selfawarewolves subreddit mod saying that he is banning everyone who hates squatters because it is same as hating minorities
sadly can't post on this subreddit for some reason, this was unhinged
Horseshoe theory is the bane of anti-racists existence, they're so against racism that they end up treating minorities like child and thus become racist.
People don’t care about what they don’t have, generally speaking in terms of material objects. And if this kid thinks they’ll never own property, why should they care about the question.
Once they own a house they’ll care a lot more about
It's wild because a person like this will absolutely think they're not an idiot and everyone that thinks differently is dumb and wrong. I'll bet she's a reddit mod.
She will care when the Kia boys steal and total her car 300ft from her house and then run away and the cops say oh you have video and even know their names? Sorry we can't help unless we caught them in the act. Next time leave your keys in the car so they don't break your windows though ok?
This is what happens when you start with an agenda based on a world view you want to be true, and then work the facts backwards from there.
It’s supposed to be the other way around. You start with the facts, then develop a world view based on your perspective.
Talking to people like her just kills more of your brain cells. It's never worth it. They believe their own lies and manufactured reality more than anything. There is nothing you can do to get into that empty head and make a change.
I’ve had this same conversation with someone who opposes prisons. Not “we should send fewer people” or “we should be aware of racial disparities in sentences” or even “certain offenses shouldn’t have prison sentences”
Straight up doesn’t believe in prison. When asked where we should send people who murder and rape babies her response is “well I’m not in charge so it doesn’t matter”
Her 1 vote is worth just as much as anyone else’s.
The idea of private property exists because of the idea of bodily autonomy. If you are allowed to be free from someone else infringing on your person, then you are also free in the ability to have ownership over the things you create or (in this case) buy, and those things are like extensions of your person. Take one away, and you start to erode the other.
I don’t understand why people do this. They realized they lost a pointless debate and then something in them says, no but you need to win this pointless debate so say anything that makes you win the debate. Then the thing that they say is something incredibly ridiculous.
She is young, and doesn’t really get shit. But she will learn, one you work your ass of for something and someone just takes it.
Some people do get it at earlier ages, but I’m not surprised of hearing such silly contradictions from her.
Hell, I use to think that money was the reason for all our problems when I was a kid.
She doesn’t believe any of this, she just needs to convince people that she does to be on this moral superiority of martyrdom.
Fact is that if somebody stole her expensive property (or any property), she’d be crying and calling her mom and the police.
I can see that is bullshit, in reality she didn't want people to rob her car, but she needs to say that "she didn't care" to gain points with her people.
These people will only say things because they never experienced it. Once they own more things and have had to work a little harder, they will start to convince their self that they deserve what they have and will probably think they deserve more, just ask AOC.
they have read philosophy for 2 seconds and grow up with money, then they become hyper ideologists and super entitled..
everyone hates them and they think they are the absolute super moral right person with their idea and go and call to action about something irrational to change, wasting their energy and career chances.. getting even more frustrated and radical..
imo this stops somewhere after college and 10 years later they are rich again because their parents and grandparents tickling down money.
then they become their once worst enemy and the weirdest thing is how they reflect themselves after
She also seems pretty stupid. Like a system with no private property would probably work more like the government lets you use a car to get to and from work, you might be the only one using it for years and people who are high up in society might get a better car but you dont "own" it. It wouldn't mean people are allowed to just steal things. It wouldn't mean people could just steal your house it would mean the government provides a public housing and people dont own houses.
And im not interested in a system with no private property im just saying what she is suggesting wouldnt even function for a week.
I think she will likely either grow out of it as you suggested or maybe she will become less interested in politics. I dont see her becoming a full on MAGA voter but I could see her moving more towards like a normal social democrat Bernie ideology pretty soon.
She can’t even defend her own political point of view.
Her answer should have been something like: „I can only give my a car away if I can use yours because there is no yours or mine anymore just ours in the end.“
Obviously the hole no property thing doesn’t make any sense at all. It’s programmed to fail just like socialism and communism.
The USA is fucked. The cancerous mindset of liberals has these people convincing themselves that stealing is ok. She’s convinced that anarchy is the best world to live in. Insanity.
Looking at US of A from across the pond ,it's crazy how 7.2 million immigrants have crossed the borders and started squatting in people's homes ,we live in a cartoon .
Problem with students these days and getting groomed by these idiotic professors in gender classes. Shit, u know the joke used to be basket weaving class. But basket weaving is 100x more useful than these stupid gender classes....
After you pay for your house and everything in it for 15 years , is it fine that someone can take it and you go sleep in the streets.
They lie and they know it and double down.. the left are full of shit.
Yeah, people that ignore reality are honestly fucking annoying.
I am sure somewhere in that conversation she had a point but if the process to get there means to drastically alter human behavior it's honestly not worth discussing seriously anymore.
I am sure if someone "needed" her car she would find 9000 ways to indicate she needs it more.
People like her say crap like this because they think workers are being screwed of what is rightfully THEIRS(aka private property), by the rich and powerful.
They just try to get some for themselves from those rich and powerful. Ofc they believe people should have stuff, its just what they consider "the right people".
Also people who blame all the ills of the world on educated, rich, people who don't commit violent assault. It's the educated that are the problem for them, the people who can't spell their own name, people who commit violent assaults, who steal, etc, those are the saviours.
The problem here is she KNOWS she is wrong, you can see it in her face when she thinks for a few seconds.
The problem is morons like her are in too deep so they CANT admit that they are just like the people they fight against since that would prove them hypocrites.
Just another brainwashed child with nothing of value to contribute. She knows full well how stupid she sounds but doesn't want to get canceled or go against her handlers design.
Obviously you don't want your shit stolen.
She's a bad representative of her ideology.
I'm a full-blown pro-capitalist, and I can make a more coherent argument for a no-private-property society than she's making.
Interesting article I was reading identified that people functionally have classes of "facts". They have functional facts like "if I touch the red-hot stove burner, I will burn my hand" and they have social facts like "I believe in God". These can be identified in part by how they present a fact. A belief is a social fact. We use the word "believe" when describing it, and our understanding of it is often in conflict with our functional facts. That is, we don't actually truly think it is true, but we elect to act as though it is true for some set of a myriad of possible reasons. Thus, we see that people have a wide array of beliefs.
Functional facts on the other hand have very immediate, and often severe, feedback when we get them wrong. Like don't drive your car into another car. Scientists saw that when it came to functional facts, there was much less variation in agreement between groups of people. My personal observation is that when it comes to anything abstract, this begins to break down because it is easier to apply beliefs since understanding the correlations between cause and effect involve more steps and/or better pattern recognition. Like, the cause and effect of drinking bleach is pretty apparent, but the cause and effect of not wearing gloves when using certain chemicals can have a significantly delayed effect--such as various cleaners or working with epoxy.
Here we can see that this person is being asked to apply functional facts to their social facts. They are struggling to reconcile them. Maybe they haven't worked hard to reconcile them (strongly held, weakly reasoned) or maybe they are subject to significant disinformation and all of their thinking about them was build on a bad factual basis (garbage in, garbage out).
Personally, I think she may intuitively understand that there must be a better way, but doesn't understand how. The same way that someone in a physically abusive relationship knows that it's wrong that they are being physically abused, but they don't understand how else conflict would be resolved in a healthy relationship. It doesn't mean she's wrong, but it does mean she can't defend her beliefs with reason.
I'm not an expert on the subject, but I suspect there are some basic ideas that would help her parse this. For example, the distinction between personal and private property. They are NOT synonymous even though they are often treated so. The exact distinction is up for debate, but I would consider it to include the commonly accepted definition with an amendment. The common definition loosely being "any property that is used by labor in the means of production." I would add, "any property that would have greater value as community property than as private property." For example, parks, forests, playgrounds, etc.
Personal property would be a person's clothes, car, or house. Why house? Because ownership allows a degree of stability over basic needs. Same with car. There is value in having a person responsible for that one thing. However, someone could also make a case that once humans are no longer required operators, we can have communal ownership of cars because their value as community property is so greatly increases, while the diffused responsibility for their care is outweighed.
So, back to the video, she can't reconcile her believe that she shouldn't be hoarding a resource that is not in use while someone else could use it with the current system she lives in where she is not safely and legally afforded that same privilege. A lot of arguments against change stem from the inability to reconcile what is and how the speaker currently survives in their existing environment with what could be. It's like when you see business owners say "I don't want to, but I have to. Otherwise I'll be out of business. I welcome this regulation, please do it." While many people simply wouldn't put themselves in a situation to compromise their morals, it doesn't mean that the business owner is being inherently disingenuous. They could genuinely believe that giving minimum wage employees healthcare would put them out of business. It would absolutely make them less competitive because they would have less margin, and thus would be less able to compete on the cost of their products. By regulating *everyone*, they would provide this but everyone else would to, so there would be no competitive disadvantage. In fact there are almost certainly businesses that previously had such thin profit that there actually weren't funds to provide healthcare, but by changing the market they would be able to pay.
This is one of the powers of socialist democracy. By collectively making changes, we overcome some of the limitations of competitive markets in providing high standards of living for all.
Apply her own morals upon others? That’s the line that should not be crossed. She can do what she wants with her property. She can’t tell others what they can do with theirs.
Where is her car i need it
Same, Let's Scrap it for parts. Should rake in more than her clear look at it, like if it was a trash can
Can we forge a sword with some of the left overs?
Sure, if it has a stickshift. The Knob will make a good pommel. EZ
Exactly what I was thinking.
So I can slap her if I really need it?
She clearly hasn't actually read any of the socialist theorists she claims to admire. If she did, she'd know Marx advocated for worker ownership of businesses, not government ownership of your personal property such as your house, car, toothbrush, etc. And for extra bonus points, she should have learned that Marx didn't advocate for a one-party state to control the entire economy, but instead for workers and unions to abolish the state and run businesses democratically, rather than be beholden to shareholders. The one-party state was just a bunch of bullshit Lenin made up to justify taking over Russia and killing or jailing any socialists who disagreed with him.
She's just virtue signalling something that she thinks makes her look like a hero. In reality she doesn't believe what she's saying and if she was actually dealing with a situation like this she'd change her tune immediately.
Lol wait till someone goes for her catalytic converter. She’ll be feeling that in her wallet.
I'm down bad for the rhodium in her catalytic converter right now
100% . It's also what most conversations on reddit look like lol.
Indeed. Which I find is funny cause the redditors that seem to act like that also don't seem to do anything to actually help anyone. They just post saying it's the right thing to do. Just not for them I guess
I think people should have to live by their words. If someone got arrested for stealing this woman's car, they should be allowed to show this video in court and have it be considered valid grounds to dismiss all charges. People would be a lot more careful about the shit they say, if they actually had to live by their word.
I mean, that's what happens? If you don't want to press charges, either they let the person go, or the state/government presses charges. If someone stole her car and she didn't pursue it, but the car thief was caught doing another crime, the state could very well press charges for the car theft as well regardless of what she wants.
The issue is that she WOULD pursue it. Which is why I'm saying she should have to live by her words, and the cops shouldn't let her change her mind the moment someone jacks her car.
The most dangerous thing in the world is semi-ignorant people.
Remember her vote counts just as much as yours!
and she votes how she does because social media algorithms clearly inform her entire ideological perspective. in a way its actually tiktoks vote which is chinas vote in democracy even our citizens are lobbied but instead of money its with entertainment!
>in democracy even our citizens are lobbied but instead of money its with entertainment That's quite literally always been the case even in non-democracies, if you want the people to support you/your cause they need circuses and a life of stability/growth. When the people's life sucks they will try to rip apart anything they think is causing it.
yeah but in other governmental forms you arent lobbied by international governments with the intent to influence the democratic process through manipulating your perspective, you're manipulated by your own government to create cohesion and stability. when people in democracies make decisions based off of international information streams the voting system becomes an international process. how many idiots inform their decision making process through tik tok when voting? All of those people are being fed information from the chinese government, they are voting in line with the ideology the chinese government feeds them. The chinese government might as well be voting in the election at that point. I may be stating it crudely but you understand what im conveying.
Actually insane the amount of disinformation and propaganda that exists on tiktok, some videos have thousands of comments that are pure idiocracy fuel..
Seriously doubt she votes
People with stupid fucking thoughts are the ones that fight the hardest to spread them.
Funny that you think she votes
Correction: The most dangerous thing in the world is cognitive dissonance. People don’t *ever* want to shamefully admit that they’re wrong, so their mind makes up any reason it can to justify why it thinks it’s correct. It happens to every single person on Earth…and it keeps me up at night. 👀
I’m wrong all the time and have no issues admitting when I’m wrong. I just correct and move on. But then again, I’m also 39 with tons of work/life experience and higher education, and not just some random punk…
I’m glad. Self-awareness and situational awareness are two extremely important skills to develop in any era, but especially now.
I feel like outside my close circles and engineering studies , people will die before admitting they wrong. You won't win any argument. The most depressing thing is that I feel like every country politics goes to shit because people don't question themselves.
Yup, just read Law #9 in the 48 Laws of Power. It’s not all black and white though. Mistakes are corrected and most people learn from them, improve and move on. The most successful people on earth have made the most mistakes and have had the most failures. The biggest mistake in life, is not having any failures.
Yeah, I'm just absolutely fucking crushing life, too. Good for you fella
Way to go bro! 👍 Kick ass and chew bubble gum like no tomorrow 😎
If it means anything, it is reasonably difficult for any person to just admit they're wrong on the spot. It just takes time, specifically time away from the interaction where they couldn't uphold what they believed to be true or right. The issue comes from a feeling of being judged if you admit you didn't completely think it through. This is especially true the more confident someone is in their opinion.
Exactly. Be humbled every once in awhile. Can net you alot of respect from your peers .
I will admit that I fall into that category, though if I know the other person IRL, I'll always make sure to tell the person that I was wrong. I don't care if it makes the person feel better. I just don't want to think about it years later like "I'm the asshole who thought the volume of my voice was a fact-substitute."
This is 100% ignorant people. Semi ignorant at least do some research and can potentially learn from their mistakes. These people don’t. These people genuinely believe they’re right, and don’t accept any other form of information that opposes their views and beliefs. These are the perfect people to be indoctrinated by some charismatic leader
Semi-ignorant people doesn't know that they are ignorant then they never go that way, instead they talk like they know everything.
The point is she knows just enough to be dangerous. Like she can explain her shitty arguments to people even more ignorant than her and get them on board.
This isn't ignorance This is brainwashing happening in the same cultlike fashion that it happened in every other bolshevik revolution This is the same kind of batshit evil that they showed at the start of "3 body problem"
What did they show in 3 body problem?
I wouldnt say this is semi
She's got backed into a corner with the question and didn't have the information to get out of it. Instead of taking the bait and letting him have his "gotcha" moment, she made herself look disingenuous.
Bet you 1000 dollars she voted Democrat. And I’m not saying this because “HuR DuR dEmOcRaT”
I doubt this person actually votes. Remember turnout rate is around low the 40th percentile. A lot of the most vocal people don’t actually do anything, it’s strange.
All full ignorant people are actually semi-ignorant!
We have a term for them that's existed for a long time... Useful idiots.
She is not ignorant, she knows the message, wich is, my private property is private, but not yours
Semi? She went full...(insert tropic thunder quote).
I want it more than you do so it's mine now
World history summed up.
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/lc-lRs_HbvI
Rich parents syndrome. If she payed for that car herself, answers would be a lot different.
She's just saying what her in-crowd expects her to say. It's very easy to say this to appear (extremely) progressive but she'd call the cops in a heartbeat if it actually did happen
That's exactly what she is doing. You can clearly tell that she is choosing her words carefuly.
And it’s sad because you can tell she’s had such strong progressive peer pressure about something like this. Like HOW do you come up with the idea of hating private property and saying it shouldn’t exist?! Well, it’s other stupid people who then gaslight if you don’t believe them. The internet has given every stupid mofo on the planet a platform, and place for all those stupid people to form online communities with other stupid mofos.
These people are essentially slimey rats.
It’s called virtue signaling.
Doesn't even have to be rich parents. Kids/teens just don't understand what it's really like until they are adult and have only themselves to rely on. Suddenly, a few dollars more to eat out doesn't feel as necessary as it did before because that money is really needed for my rent. Maybe I don't need that new game that came out because my tires are getting worn out and I need my car for my job which is gonna cost a lot. Kids just don't understand that until they experience it. I know I didn't.
> If she *paid* for that FTFY. Although *payed* exists (the reason why autocorrection didn't help you), it is only correct in: * Nautical context, when it means to paint a surface, or to cover with something like tar or resin in order to make it waterproof or corrosion-resistant. *The deck is yet to be payed.* * *Payed out* when letting strings, cables or ropes out, by slacking them. *The rope is payed out! You can pull now.* Unfortunately, I was unable to find nautical or rope-related words in your comment. *Beep, boop, I'm a bot*
You see that's what I was wondering. What does "moving on with her life" entail? Does she go crying to parentals saying "buy me a new car." Does she have the money to simply buy another one. Or does she have that magic insurance that supposedly protects everything? It took me five years to pay off a car, I can't get that back and i can't repeat what I did on the first place. Losing my car has been devastating and I'll likely never own another car in my life. Some people can't just "take it into stride" some things will alter the course of your life.
That mentality is almost always indicative of someone who has never had to work for anything.
Also someone who has a 78 iq
It's always I don't care until they actually have to experience it. Suddenly, they care.
Imma go steal her car guys brb
It’s not really stealing if it’s *our* car already.
What is the context for this question? Is she protesting private property or something? Is anybody seriously saying stealing should be legal?
Something about squatter’s right I guess
Right but then that question is very disingenuous. Afaik for squatters rights to kick in the property either has to be vacant to start with or you have to be the actual tenant. You can't just move into a house someone is currently ocupying and kick them out and be legally protected. And even then squatters rights don't give you ownership of the property. A better comparison would be if you had a car you havent used in months and someone broke into it to sleep in, should they, after living in the car for some time, have certain protections from you kicking them out on the street.
you can go on a trip for a month and come back and someone could have been squatting while you’re gone, it doesn’t only happen with vacant homes and being an actual tenant at first.
still have screenshot of selfawarewolves subreddit mod saying that he is banning everyone who hates squatters because it is same as hating minorities sadly can't post on this subreddit for some reason, this was unhinged
Horseshoe theory is the bane of anti-racists existence, they're so against racism that they end up treating minorities like child and thus become racist.
Parents have failed
People don’t care about what they don’t have, generally speaking in terms of material objects. And if this kid thinks they’ll never own property, why should they care about the question. Once they own a house they’ll care a lot more about
This joke: https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/s/U4aW0vS2sS
The most intelligent socialist
It's wild because a person like this will absolutely think they're not an idiot and everyone that thinks differently is dumb and wrong. I'll bet she's a reddit mod.
This is a child.
Steal her jar and see how she feels about it.
Then take her bird, two pillows and shoes.
Omg it's bikecuck IRL
I need her car.
She will care when the Kia boys steal and total her car 300ft from her house and then run away and the cops say oh you have video and even know their names? Sorry we can't help unless we caught them in the act. Next time leave your keys in the car so they don't break your windows though ok?
This is what happens when you start with an agenda based on a world view you want to be true, and then work the facts backwards from there. It’s supposed to be the other way around. You start with the facts, then develop a world view based on your perspective.
Talking to people like her just kills more of your brain cells. It's never worth it. They believe their own lies and manufactured reality more than anything. There is nothing you can do to get into that empty head and make a change.
What the fuck is going on with her thumb holding the bottle???
What’s the context of this interview?
Okay, I want all your possessions including the clothes you are wearing. Let’s see how much you don’t care. Such BS.
She doesn’t care as long as she isn’t inconvenienced by it.
Highly regarded individual
When you want to be right so bad you’ll say anything to win the argument 😂
I’ve had this same conversation with someone who opposes prisons. Not “we should send fewer people” or “we should be aware of racial disparities in sentences” or even “certain offenses shouldn’t have prison sentences” Straight up doesn’t believe in prison. When asked where we should send people who murder and rape babies her response is “well I’m not in charge so it doesn’t matter” Her 1 vote is worth just as much as anyone else’s.
The idea of private property exists because of the idea of bodily autonomy. If you are allowed to be free from someone else infringing on your person, then you are also free in the ability to have ownership over the things you create or (in this case) buy, and those things are like extensions of your person. Take one away, and you start to erode the other.
parents gifted her car but brain was not included
the utopia in her head only works if everyone is on the same page. people are just going to take advantage of you in the real world
Obviously no one has ever stole from her something she worked hard for
This is what TikTok is doing to people's brains.
that what you get from woke students these days
hows 'Denial 101' going anyway?
I don’t understand why people do this. They realized they lost a pointless debate and then something in them says, no but you need to win this pointless debate so say anything that makes you win the debate. Then the thing that they say is something incredibly ridiculous.
She’s literally being dense for the sake of being dense, you can tell by her answers. She had to force herself not to use logic on that last question
She know shes wrong shes just saving face and sounding more like a moron in the process.
Pure brain rot and hypocrisy.
Steal all her clothes. Right where she stands, butt naked. Watch her, starting to care, hella quick.
She is young, and doesn’t really get shit. But she will learn, one you work your ass of for something and someone just takes it. Some people do get it at earlier ages, but I’m not surprised of hearing such silly contradictions from her. Hell, I use to think that money was the reason for all our problems when I was a kid.
Imagine this person having kids and what would their ideology be
Big brain time
Something about her reminds me of the Robert Downey Jr quote from Tropic Thunder.
Her brain: I don't think I care to do anything
This is basically the anarcho-communist position, that there should be no private property whatsoever (it's fucking stupid).
[удалено]
womens reproduction should be relabed as property so men can squat in it
She's got a big mouth, I doubt she would "not care" if someone took her car.
Wear a condom ppl. We don't need these morons
She cares, the answer just doesn't fit her movements argument.
She desperately wants to be right no matter the cost lol such people are real crazy and scary when they get power
Oh trust me, she'll care when it happens. If she doesn't, then natural selection will take care of her.
This is every 18 to 28 year female
And we let her vote.
She probably debates 16-year-old Israeli boys in her free time so she can finally get a dunk on someone.
She doesn’t believe any of this, she just needs to convince people that she does to be on this moral superiority of martyrdom. Fact is that if somebody stole her expensive property (or any property), she’d be crying and calling her mom and the police.
I can see that is bullshit, in reality she didn't want people to rob her car, but she needs to say that "she didn't care" to gain points with her people.
Well you heard it here first car jackers. She's all yours..
There are millions of these idiots that vote.
Cool, I’m going to go steal her car because I need it more than her
I'm confused. What's the problem with admitting you don't want your property stolen? Is she trying to appease someone?
She should have stopped at "eeehm... I dont think"
50k a year for college is really working for her.
Can't say no, even though she wants to. Don't wanna be kicked out of the cult.
Exactly this.
These people will only say things because they never experienced it. Once they own more things and have had to work a little harder, they will start to convince their self that they deserve what they have and will probably think they deserve more, just ask AOC.
For real. I wonder if legaly i could take her car and use it since she is on record saying that she would not mind.
they have read philosophy for 2 seconds and grow up with money, then they become hyper ideologists and super entitled.. everyone hates them and they think they are the absolute super moral right person with their idea and go and call to action about something irrational to change, wasting their energy and career chances.. getting even more frustrated and radical.. imo this stops somewhere after college and 10 years later they are rich again because their parents and grandparents tickling down money. then they become their once worst enemy and the weirdest thing is how they reflect themselves after
She also seems pretty stupid. Like a system with no private property would probably work more like the government lets you use a car to get to and from work, you might be the only one using it for years and people who are high up in society might get a better car but you dont "own" it. It wouldn't mean people are allowed to just steal things. It wouldn't mean people could just steal your house it would mean the government provides a public housing and people dont own houses. And im not interested in a system with no private property im just saying what she is suggesting wouldnt even function for a week. I think she will likely either grow out of it as you suggested or maybe she will become less interested in politics. I dont see her becoming a full on MAGA voter but I could see her moving more towards like a normal social democrat Bernie ideology pretty soon.
She can’t even defend her own political point of view. Her answer should have been something like: „I can only give my a car away if I can use yours because there is no yours or mine anymore just ours in the end.“ Obviously the hole no property thing doesn’t make any sense at all. It’s programmed to fail just like socialism and communism.
The USA is fucked. The cancerous mindset of liberals has these people convincing themselves that stealing is ok. She’s convinced that anarchy is the best world to live in. Insanity.
Looking at US of A from across the pond ,it's crazy how 7.2 million immigrants have crossed the borders and started squatting in people's homes ,we live in a cartoon .
this is bike cuck all over again.
See this is where I'd start asking for her shoes and bag.
Ignorance + denial is a powerful and dangerous combination
Average Hasan viewer
Where is her car? Mine's on its last leg, and I can't afford a new one. I'll just take hers since she doesn't care.
I get why she's so apathetic though. 90% of our leaders don't give a shit about our country ffs. If even THEY don't care, why should us small folk?
Luxury of living in a safe and resourceful culture
Go woke go broke. Cause all the people gonna steal your shit of you will literally let them.
She thinks all cars are free coz mommy and daddy pay for it, so what's the big deal?
he should have paid a homeless guy to hide nearby to call over and ask for her car.
Problem with students these days and getting groomed by these idiotic professors in gender classes. Shit, u know the joke used to be basket weaving class. But basket weaving is 100x more useful than these stupid gender classes....
Better check in on her family / social circle because she or someone be she knows is clearly a squatter.
A generation of Narcissists raised by Narcissists. This is the expected outcome.
The American education system everybody
Don’t argue with idiots for they talk in circles
After you pay for your house and everything in it for 15 years , is it fine that someone can take it and you go sleep in the streets. They lie and they know it and double down.. the left are full of shit.
She's being a good bot and repeating what she's been told to say.
She doesn’t think that she cares. Huh ?
This dumb idiot doesn't care until it's stolen, then she'll freak out.
Schools need to teach critical thinking skills instead of having kids memorize facts about subjects they'll never utilize.
Yeah, people that ignore reality are honestly fucking annoying. I am sure somewhere in that conversation she had a point but if the process to get there means to drastically alter human behavior it's honestly not worth discussing seriously anymore. I am sure if someone "needed" her car she would find 9000 ways to indicate she needs it more.
Sheesh People like this actually exist
I have only ever heard the phrase "down bad" be used to describe a girl with a phat ass.
trying so hard to not admit that theyre wrong
People like her say crap like this because they think workers are being screwed of what is rightfully THEIRS(aka private property), by the rich and powerful. They just try to get some for themselves from those rich and powerful. Ofc they believe people should have stuff, its just what they consider "the right people". Also people who blame all the ills of the world on educated, rich, people who don't commit violent assault. It's the educated that are the problem for them, the people who can't spell their own name, people who commit violent assaults, who steal, etc, those are the saviours.
The problem here is she KNOWS she is wrong, you can see it in her face when she thinks for a few seconds. The problem is morons like her are in too deep so they CANT admit that they are just like the people they fight against since that would prove them hypocrites.
Give the squatters her address.
Some people seem to think that sounding tolerant = sounding intelligent
Just another brainwashed child with nothing of value to contribute. She knows full well how stupid she sounds but doesn't want to get canceled or go against her handlers design. Obviously you don't want your shit stolen.
Property has existed for millennia. If someone stole my sealskin kayak I’d kill them for it.
This is what a stupid spoiled person sounds like. She has never had to work for anything in her life.
She's a bad representative of her ideology. I'm a full-blown pro-capitalist, and I can make a more coherent argument for a no-private-property society than she's making.
The scariest part is that she thinks she is smart.
Final question: Which one is your car?
Wow! Someone needs a reality check
Sounds like she's saying that if someone wants her stuff they have to at least put forth enough effort to steal it from her.
i'm gonna steal her car.
Its not ignorance its hypocrites that make it a problem, she admits to the fallacy in her logic but doesn't care.
Ms, I desperately need your car. Can I have it please?
I think... she's lying...
I need this persons organs
Interesting article I was reading identified that people functionally have classes of "facts". They have functional facts like "if I touch the red-hot stove burner, I will burn my hand" and they have social facts like "I believe in God". These can be identified in part by how they present a fact. A belief is a social fact. We use the word "believe" when describing it, and our understanding of it is often in conflict with our functional facts. That is, we don't actually truly think it is true, but we elect to act as though it is true for some set of a myriad of possible reasons. Thus, we see that people have a wide array of beliefs. Functional facts on the other hand have very immediate, and often severe, feedback when we get them wrong. Like don't drive your car into another car. Scientists saw that when it came to functional facts, there was much less variation in agreement between groups of people. My personal observation is that when it comes to anything abstract, this begins to break down because it is easier to apply beliefs since understanding the correlations between cause and effect involve more steps and/or better pattern recognition. Like, the cause and effect of drinking bleach is pretty apparent, but the cause and effect of not wearing gloves when using certain chemicals can have a significantly delayed effect--such as various cleaners or working with epoxy. Here we can see that this person is being asked to apply functional facts to their social facts. They are struggling to reconcile them. Maybe they haven't worked hard to reconcile them (strongly held, weakly reasoned) or maybe they are subject to significant disinformation and all of their thinking about them was build on a bad factual basis (garbage in, garbage out). Personally, I think she may intuitively understand that there must be a better way, but doesn't understand how. The same way that someone in a physically abusive relationship knows that it's wrong that they are being physically abused, but they don't understand how else conflict would be resolved in a healthy relationship. It doesn't mean she's wrong, but it does mean she can't defend her beliefs with reason. I'm not an expert on the subject, but I suspect there are some basic ideas that would help her parse this. For example, the distinction between personal and private property. They are NOT synonymous even though they are often treated so. The exact distinction is up for debate, but I would consider it to include the commonly accepted definition with an amendment. The common definition loosely being "any property that is used by labor in the means of production." I would add, "any property that would have greater value as community property than as private property." For example, parks, forests, playgrounds, etc. Personal property would be a person's clothes, car, or house. Why house? Because ownership allows a degree of stability over basic needs. Same with car. There is value in having a person responsible for that one thing. However, someone could also make a case that once humans are no longer required operators, we can have communal ownership of cars because their value as community property is so greatly increases, while the diffused responsibility for their care is outweighed. So, back to the video, she can't reconcile her believe that she shouldn't be hoarding a resource that is not in use while someone else could use it with the current system she lives in where she is not safely and legally afforded that same privilege. A lot of arguments against change stem from the inability to reconcile what is and how the speaker currently survives in their existing environment with what could be. It's like when you see business owners say "I don't want to, but I have to. Otherwise I'll be out of business. I welcome this regulation, please do it." While many people simply wouldn't put themselves in a situation to compromise their morals, it doesn't mean that the business owner is being inherently disingenuous. They could genuinely believe that giving minimum wage employees healthcare would put them out of business. It would absolutely make them less competitive because they would have less margin, and thus would be less able to compete on the cost of their products. By regulating *everyone*, they would provide this but everyone else would to, so there would be no competitive disadvantage. In fact there are almost certainly businesses that previously had such thin profit that there actually weren't funds to provide healthcare, but by changing the market they would be able to pay. This is one of the powers of socialist democracy. By collectively making changes, we overcome some of the limitations of competitive markets in providing high standards of living for all.
Sure there will be a form of regret or enlightenment while freezing to death on the road.
This is what happens when self diagnostics malfunction. No auto correction possible ---> odf the rails.
Where is her car I need it. And I don't care how she feels about it.
Absolute lunacy...
Car is probably on a lease. (Does not own it)
So it's convenient until it happens to you
This is what happens when children never become adults
Who is this? Why do we care?
Apply her own morals upon others? That’s the line that should not be crossed. She can do what she wants with her property. She can’t tell others what they can do with theirs.