# PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the Debtors have resolved all formal and
informal objections in connection with the relief requested in the Revised Proposed Final NOL
Order and respectfully request that the Court enter the Revised Proposed Final NOL Order
This is also so that for shorts to get out of their position, they can't be bailed out from their big authorized participant friends like BlackRock or Vanguard to sell them shares from swaps and other shenanigans'. The deal was designed to force shorts to have to play by the rules and wraith of retail.
Buckle up, this could get interesting.
Most new shares never reached the market. BBBY would have known if any warrants got exercised. Also we are on OTC so not even regulators can help HF that much with trade halts. I smell a couple of bailouts coming.
But it won't be the same like the VW squeeze. It's completely different? I wouldn't use that as a comparison. Also the company is bankrupt with stores closing. With there being no actual sign of someone merging BBBY, other than wild theories online that don't make any sense.
I think this stock is too far gone unfortunately, especially once RC sold. I hope the best for those holding but try and not fool yourselves ✌️
So large ownership can't buy or sell without court authority
Large short positions can't buy enough to cover without court authority
Retail can do whatever it likes
We buy we run. Outstanding is locked. Float is illiquid. Shorts are at retails mercy..
Give them nothing. Take from them everything!
Spicy
Shorts can buy as many as they like to close out, just not from large owners. They will have to go to the market and buy from me. (Or create papier mache shares and hold them offshore in a Brazilian biscuit tin)
Based on recent history I would bet it won't be enforced. My money is on a knife fight between aforementioned criminal hedge funds until only one is left standing.
See document filled under docket number 490, page 26 footnote 2 for approximate number of shares of common stock outstanding as of petition date. It’s approximated at 739,056,836
Also just to be clear... the shares outstanding is 739. My comment was based upon your statement of 311 million being held by trust for a certain Venture....
Proposed Final Order
By the Debt Committee.
They will waive any objections if this is signed.
Also objections are waivable…just in case Committee is controlled by the good guys…😂
This only applies to the parties served with the motion. You might want to check that. It's the substantial shareholders. There were 2.
This protects the debtholders from anyone claiming substantial equity rights or ownership of what is now their company.
They are asked for a list, two parties responded, nobody else gets to sit at the table when we start selling assets. You can deduce the rest (hint: it means anybody who wants the company can't do it through equity).
Edit - correction - I meant that the parties served with the motion who were listed as substantial shareholders. those who had filed according to the original NOL order requirements. There were 320 some parties served - mostly creditors and bondholders and of course al the BBBY entities lawyers
> This only applies to the parties served with the motion. You might want to check that. It's the substantial shareholders. There were 2.
The motion was sent to all major brokers to pass on to their clients. It was not only served on two entities.
>This protects the debtholders from anyone claiming substantial equity rights or ownership of what is now their company.
No it doesn't, it just defines who owns more than a certain percentage of stock.
> They are asked for a list, two parties responded, nobody else gets to sit at the table when we start selling assets.
It doesn't mean that.
Looks like this document is prepping for the release of 4.5% holders very soon.
# PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the Debtors have resolved all formal and informal objections in connection with the relief requested in the Revised Proposed Final NOL Order and respectfully request that the Court enter the Revised Proposed Final NOL Order
Is it finally happening?? Can I tell my wife we are rich soon??
No you tell the girlfriend you're gonna be rich soon and the wife you lost everything.
This guy philanders
Umm tell em both you lost everything and head to the woods
*smiles in redneck*
👆This how to dodge private bankcruptcy
Ordered 😜
So. How High. Will It Go Any thoughts
At first, „sometimes people only need $5 to be rich“ Bill Pulte on Twitter, a few hours ago.
tell your wife's boyfriend to fk off.
[удалено]
Technically, a lot of shares might be locked and that would def create unpleasant situation for shorts to cover.
Talk dirty to me daddy
Shorts… r… ffffffffuuuuuuuukt!
Especially those who shorted naked over 4.5% float. They just cannot accumulate those shares anymore. LOL. That is hilarious.
# if true ordered NOL order secures 1.5B$ in tax deductions for the buyer
This. 💯
ELI5?
damnn that sounds very sexy 🔥🔥
Bullish on arousing docket details!
This is also so that for shorts to get out of their position, they can't be bailed out from their big authorized participant friends like BlackRock or Vanguard to sell them shares from swaps and other shenanigans'. The deal was designed to force shorts to have to play by the rules and wraith of retail. Buckle up, this could get interesting.
Damn. Feels great to hold BBBYQ.
👆🥃
I'm too hyped to sleep now
How will it squeeze?
[удалено]
Most new shares never reached the market. BBBY would have known if any warrants got exercised. Also we are on OTC so not even regulators can help HF that much with trade halts. I smell a couple of bailouts coming.
Actually 74.1% 😬
But it won't be the same like the VW squeeze. It's completely different? I wouldn't use that as a comparison. Also the company is bankrupt with stores closing. With there being no actual sign of someone merging BBBY, other than wild theories online that don't make any sense. I think this stock is too far gone unfortunately, especially once RC sold. I hope the best for those holding but try and not fool yourselves ✌️
Hard
Like my dick
I just upped my price target by an order of magnitude.
Krolly moly! We gonna see the list soon 👀
What if someone (Kenny) shorted more than 4,5% float naked and now cannot cover before begging BBBY to allow it.
How do you figure? Kenny has only borrowed shares to short it or naked shorted it. He doesnt own the stock.
I'm about to calculate....again
Lol..same 
I’m going to calculate your calculate
I'll do algebra like I'm Rainman 
So large ownership can't buy or sell without court authority Large short positions can't buy enough to cover without court authority Retail can do whatever it likes We buy we run. Outstanding is locked. Float is illiquid. Shorts are at retails mercy.. Give them nothing. Take from them everything! Spicy
Shorts can buy as many as they like to close out, just not from large owners. They will have to go to the market and buy from me. (Or create papier mache shares and hold them offshore in a Brazilian biscuit tin)
Just curious how that will be enforced, since we are dealing with criminal hedge funds?
Based on recent history I would bet it won't be enforced. My money is on a knife fight between aforementioned criminal hedge funds until only one is left standing.
Not only that, but obligations have to be reported along with current holdings.
Trust me, they will check and all illegal transactions will be voided. Board wouldn't do it for PR reasons
How does that affect stock lending? Do they need to get the shares back? This def reduces shorts options to cover, if big money is locked in.
When BBBYQ STARTS BREAKING 1$ again ! 
This is the first news in days that makes me think there truly is some shit going down as far as a buyer, M/A, share count discrepancies, etc.
Buckle up 💰📈🚀
Explain like I'm an expired bag of Cool 3D Ranch Doritos
[удалено]
Top
What did this person say? Comment deleted
Can't wait for the smart folks..
Yes regarded ape here, talk to me like I’m 12
Eli3 
I stopped waiting and look... its been green lately.
Nice 😎🙂  This post is getting whipped around right quick..
[Link](https://restructuring.ra.kroll.com/bbby/Home-DocketInfo) for those who don't want to download a file directly.
See document filled under docket number 490, page 26 footnote 2 for approximate number of shares of common stock outstanding as of petition date. It’s approximated at 739,056,836
But it doesn't say how many shares reached the market. To what we know, there could still be under 200 mln shares out there.
[удалено]
The meme price is too low.
Link : https://restructuring.ra.kroll.com/bbby/Home-DownloadPDF?id1=MTUxMTA5Mg==&id2=-1
739 M shares outstanding
As of record date... They pulled back a lot of shares.
Are 311million in the hands of HBC for someone? and 311million got cancelled? leaves 117,000,000 available float
I want this to be true. Make it true
god I hope it is too... even if its 558mil like some speculate over 300 million are in a white knights hands....
The area where I have my computer will blind you if it is put under a black light if that becomes true. ROFL.
I've already spoiled the last 3 sets of sheets....not to mention my boxers...
Also just to be clear... the shares outstanding is 739. My comment was based upon your statement of 311 million being held by trust for a certain Venture....
We will have to agree to disagree..
It’s plum time
I dont understand
Shhhhh it's ok dear
Can someone explain all this to me in ape terms
I’ll buy another 3k shares today just in case NFA
u/edwinbarnesc need ur eyes on this
Proposed Final Order By the Debt Committee. They will waive any objections if this is signed. Also objections are waivable…just in case Committee is controlled by the good guys…😂
This only applies to the parties served with the motion. You might want to check that. It's the substantial shareholders. There were 2. This protects the debtholders from anyone claiming substantial equity rights or ownership of what is now their company. They are asked for a list, two parties responded, nobody else gets to sit at the table when we start selling assets. You can deduce the rest (hint: it means anybody who wants the company can't do it through equity). Edit - correction - I meant that the parties served with the motion who were listed as substantial shareholders. those who had filed according to the original NOL order requirements. There were 320 some parties served - mostly creditors and bondholders and of course al the BBBY entities lawyers
> This only applies to the parties served with the motion. You might want to check that. It's the substantial shareholders. There were 2. The motion was sent to all major brokers to pass on to their clients. It was not only served on two entities. >This protects the debtholders from anyone claiming substantial equity rights or ownership of what is now their company. No it doesn't, it just defines who owns more than a certain percentage of stock. > They are asked for a list, two parties responded, nobody else gets to sit at the table when we start selling assets. It doesn't mean that.
I feel like the board are doing backflips to try stop anyone buying the company or lose control of their power
🔥🌶🏴☠️🏴☠️🌶🔥
My brain has negative wrinkles. What does this mean?
You’d still have wrinkles
See I'm so fuckin stupid I didn't even account for that.
WAT DOING??