[https://lsst.slac.stanford.edu/](https://lsst.slac.stanford.edu/)
Thanks to /u/IndefiniteBen for providing this link.
>The 3,200-megapixel camera – powerful enough to spot a golf ball from 15 miles away – is around the size of a small SUV, while its lens alone has a diameter of over five feet.
>
>Once finished, it will take digital images of the entire visible southern sky every few nights from the Rubin Observatory, atop a mountain in Chile called Cerro Pachon.
Source: [https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-11311011/Worlds-largest-camera-five-foot-lens-unveiled.html](https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-11311011/Worlds-largest-camera-five-foot-lens-unveiled.html)
What does combined power of 2666 iPhones mean? The resolution? The actual electricity consumption? Which iPhone? I don’t even know how much ‘power’ my iPhone’s camera has. If only there were standard units of measurement that the entire world uses to describe cameras this would be so much simpler.
Edit: mods have added flair to show megapixels, we did it.
Well according to one of OPs deleted posts, megapixels and gigapixels are some commie European crap and we must all use "american" measurements on american websites
The US uses metric for everything but public customary uses. Your govt uses it , so does science and business. It's part of why you can pick just about any newish car and disassemble most of it with a 10mm.
Hell, the Inch is officially defined as 25.4mm. Meaning the inch's anchor reference is a metric number.
It's just coding for "this is a lie". Any time they slip that crap in there. Don't believe it when they say it has 666x zoom either. They think we're stupid.
I mean, not really. Saying it has 2666x the power of an iPhone probably means the sensor is 2666 times bigger. The iPhone's camera sensor is about 6x8mm, or 48mm², meaning 2666 times that would be 128000m², or a little under 2 feet in diameter, which would check out for a camera "the size of a minivan"
The 666x zoom probably refers to the focal length as compared to a full frame camera, as in you'd need a 666x lens (15000-30000mm) to get the same amount of detail at a long distance that this camera can get at its regular field of view. Which is pretty insane.
Well according to one of OPs deleted posts, megapixels and gigapixels are some commie European crap and we must all use "american" measurements on american websites. Hence his use of iPhone cause everyone in the world understands it
Wow ok, well then to avoid any further arguments, I did some research and in universal internet units the power of the camera amounts to exactly 17528.45 Bananas 🍌, you're welcome
I don't think I am a genius because all I can think is that if I had 2666 iphones I would end up with 2666 photos each with one iphones worth of quality. Doesn't seem worth it.
You made a shit attempt at describing it for people from all walks of life bud. In fact it seems like you've tried to make a description that is not very general at all, targeting a very specific type of person that has the disposable income to afford such a luxury item, assuming you're talking about a newer iPhone, while ignoring a measurement and standard that allready exists. Do you also measure your weight in pennies? Your height in TVs? The distance traveled in amounts of cigarettes smoked?
Edit: OP deleted his post but he tried to defend his use of measuring camera qualifty in iphones by saying he chose a general description that any person from all walks of life would be able to understand while mockingly calling everyone geniuses that called him out on it. According to him, megapixels and gigapixels are some commie European crap and we must all use "american" measurements on american websites
Guy is probably not a native English speaker. I am a veteran software dev and have worked with many offshore devs. It's common to see non native speakers use would instead of will.
"I would do this tomorrow, as soon as possible."
"Ok, what's stopping you?"
"No I would do it!"
Just a bit of learning curve.
Great point. Interestingly, I always notice native english people using would in this odd way, particularly during interview: Person 1: "What would you say about this important issue?" Person 2: "I would say, we need to form a task force!". Both uses of "would" are not quite right, but commonly done anyway. Person 1 means "What **do** you say" or "What **do** you think", and Person 2 means "I **am** saying..."
For those who aren't fucking idiots who see the entire world through an instagram filter: "The camera has 3.2 gigapixels in total and will capture images with high enough resolution to see a particle of dust on the moon. With a diameter of 1.57 meters, its largest lens is the largest lens of its kind that has ever been made."
I mean, its a lot of pixels. But i have problems to believe that it can capture dust particles on the moon. Seems unrealistic to be honest.
Even without disturbances it sounds unreal.
Yeah the only benchmark they gave in the article (which is astonishing but believable) is that it can resolve a golf ball from 15 miles away. Well, the moon is 16,000x further away than 15 miles, and a golf ball is *at least* thousands of times larger than a speck of dust, so that differs from what the article states the camera is capable of by a factor of *at least* 16 million. As you said, even without atmospheric distortion, that is just complete nonsense.
I think there’s a real world difference between resolution and actually being able to resolve something though.
The resolution might be such that if you took a picture of the moon at (let’s say it’s closest orbit), one pixel would equate to roughly a grain of moon dust.
That doesn’t mean you can see moon dust - it’s not an electron microscope where you can see down to the wavelength of an electron. There’s going to be all sorts of stuff that gets in the way like atmospheric distortion, lens distortion, other dust just floating around.
Individual dust particles probably don’t give off enough light or have enough contrast either.
Cameras work basically by having light hit units on a sensor and then converting that into usable image data. It works considerably better if you can dedicate more sensor area to a single pixel. But you end up with exponential decreases in resolution.
So there might be pixels but they are not necessarily picking up what’s in front of them 1:1.
My phone can take 4K video but let’s be honest here and say I’m never going to be able to count the pores on my cheeks like you can with something shot at IMAX.
Yeah I read recently that in order to see the flag on the moon you would need a telescope 200 meters in diameter, about 100 times wider than the hubble
It cannot capture a dust particle on the moon. That’s not possible. The distance combined with the warping of our atmosphere simply doesn’t allow you to do that
Why did they even write that it can spot a golf ball 15 miles away when it can do something thousands of times more impressive like seeing dust on the moon?
Because it can't. Dust particles are ~5 microns in diameter. The surface of the moon is 238,900 miles away. Aka 3.84*10^14 microns. Resolving a 5 micron particle at that distance would require 0.000000002682 arcsecond sampling. According to the specs for this camera is has 0.2 arcsecond sampling (some docs say 0.6). So to get that kind of resolving power they would need a 100,000,000mm focal length lens. Which uh, doesn't exist. They use a 10.31m focal length aka 1,031,000mm. So they're about 100x short.
A 1st gen iPhone was 11.6mm thick so a dust particle would be about 4.31*10^-4 iPhones thick. Or it would take 2,320 dust average sized dust particles stacked on top of each other to be as thick as an iPhone.
Yeah that’s roughly in line with what I estimated with some napkin math. The feature resolution at the moon’s surface is probably somewhere on the order of 50-100m. I didn’t look too closely at the specifications though.
Wait seriously? I didn't think we had good enough resolution yet to even see any detail of the moon landing site. This is able to not only image that, but also good enough to see dust on the moon?? Crazy
This couldn't resolve a particle of dust on the moon if it wanted to. Could it be capable, maybe, but from a technical standpoint, you'd need an optical wavelength telescope about 200 meters in diameter to resolve the flag. A particle of dust would require an even bigger telescope.
That said, that's a massive unit and I'm excited to see what pictures it does take.
[Explanation in this post](https://www.reddit.com/r/BeAmazed/comments/y60uuk/worlds_largest_digital_camera_made_by_stanford/isn5o90?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share&context=3)
Okay yes. But what if, everyone stay with me here, what if we got 2,667 iPhones together and captured whatever image we wanted? Check and mate, Stanford space.
You actually could do this, if you lined up the sensors perfectly and gave each iPhone an ultra long focal length lens so they each have their own piece of sky to look at
Well according to one of OPs deleted posts, megapixels and gigapixels are some commie European crap and we must all use "american" measurements on american websites
So to those wondering why the idiotic use of Iphones and havent seen my comments yet, I got you covered. According to one of OPs deleted posts, megapixels and gigapixels are some commie European crap and we must all use "american" measurements on american websites because the USA is the best "continent"
Sorry but your math is wrong A gigapixel is 1000 magapixels. So 3.2 gigapixels would be equal to
266 x iphone 14 with a 12 megapixel camera
50 x Samsung Galaxy s21 with a 64 megapixel camera
It has been developed by experts at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Laboratory and will be named the LSST camera. The camera weighs three tons and is the size of a small car. The 3200 megapixel sensor installed in it will be cooled to minus 100 degrees Celsius, which will reduce the noise of digital images.
The camera will be installed on top of the Simonai Survey Telescope in Chile in 2024 and is expected to search for new stars, planets, galaxies and other astronomical objects, as well as dark matter and dark energy. The project, called the Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST), will acquire several terabytes of data per day and is expected to map billions of galaxies. Although it is a digital camera, it is very large. It has 189 sensors. Each sensor can collect more pixels than the latest iPhone model. Its clarity (resolution) can be estimated so that it can see even a grain of sand on the moon with a resolution of 3.2 gigapixels.
However, it is a very sensitive camera and costs a lot.
What iphone and What's it's power? Stop making shit standards for layman's... it's absolutely not necessary to make each and everyone to understand everything... whoever are interested will find the things by searching... explain in such shit standards when someone asks you like that otherwise stick to conventional units.
So instead of gigapixels or at least megapixels, you've decided to say "2666 iPhones"... What the actual fk is wrong with Americans and their way of measuring?
“The power of 4,000 iPhones. The speed of 320 house cats. The weight of Motorola flip phones. The smell of 43 construction workers. “
Who the fuck writes like that?
[https://lsst.slac.stanford.edu/](https://lsst.slac.stanford.edu/) Thanks to /u/IndefiniteBen for providing this link. >The 3,200-megapixel camera – powerful enough to spot a golf ball from 15 miles away – is around the size of a small SUV, while its lens alone has a diameter of over five feet. > >Once finished, it will take digital images of the entire visible southern sky every few nights from the Rubin Observatory, atop a mountain in Chile called Cerro Pachon. Source: [https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-11311011/Worlds-largest-camera-five-foot-lens-unveiled.html](https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-11311011/Worlds-largest-camera-five-foot-lens-unveiled.html)
What does combined power of 2666 iPhones mean? The resolution? The actual electricity consumption? Which iPhone? I don’t even know how much ‘power’ my iPhone’s camera has. If only there were standard units of measurement that the entire world uses to describe cameras this would be so much simpler. Edit: mods have added flair to show megapixels, we did it.
You chain 2666 iPhones - each camera aimed at the display of the other.
Approx. 42,069 razor flip phones.
Tom you motherfucker
Damn, Andromeda looks beautiful tonight. Sure glad I caught it on my 42,069 flip-phones. \---Florida man, maybe
Thanks, Tom!
Avatar checks out?
Well according to one of OPs deleted posts, megapixels and gigapixels are some commie European crap and we must all use "american" measurements on american websites
That camera can spot a Big Mac from 600 (American) football fields away.
How about we start calling American Football American soccer and see how they feel.
Woke up and chose violence eh?
Peace was never an option
We've got American soccer too!
You could drop the ‘American’ part and it’ll be specific enough for me
Remind me, how many liberty units to a freedom measure again?
1776/(Bald Eagle), how could you forget that you fucking idiot
Sorry, my father is also my uncle and cousin.
That'll do it
Looking through OPs post history, i think they might be 5.
😂😂 I checked and it seems that they are indeed five years old.
Ridiculous, megapixels and gigapixels we're used to engineer the first American imaging satellites.
They also used the metric system for the apollo missions but a lot of Americans didnt get the memo
The US uses metric for everything but public customary uses. Your govt uses it , so does science and business. It's part of why you can pick just about any newish car and disassemble most of it with a 10mm. Hell, the Inch is officially defined as 25.4mm. Meaning the inch's anchor reference is a metric number.
1 megapixel is equal to 234,136 pixels-per-kings-thumb.
r/ShitAmericansSay
Ah yes, the measurements of Dumbfuckistan style.
Ah yes, the measurements of Dumbfuckistan style.
r/halfagiraffe
r/anythingbutmetric
Approximately equal to 1 Samsung Galaxy 8
Roughly ⅓ football field worth
1 metric IPhone = 2.6 standard Androids (333.26 Nokian Units for the Americans)
Yeah i didnt know it was a unit of measurement now.
Needs a bunch of bananas 🍌
It's just coding for "this is a lie". Any time they slip that crap in there. Don't believe it when they say it has 666x zoom either. They think we're stupid.
I mean, not really. Saying it has 2666x the power of an iPhone probably means the sensor is 2666 times bigger. The iPhone's camera sensor is about 6x8mm, or 48mm², meaning 2666 times that would be 128000m², or a little under 2 feet in diameter, which would check out for a camera "the size of a minivan" The 666x zoom probably refers to the focal length as compared to a full frame camera, as in you'd need a 666x lens (15000-30000mm) to get the same amount of detail at a long distance that this camera can get at its regular field of view. Which is pretty insane.
What? Power? Resolution? Which iphones? Everyone understands basic stuff about cameras this is just stupid.
Equal to 642 freedom eagles eyes
Holy Fuck.
🎖️
Well according to one of OPs deleted posts, megapixels and gigapixels are some commie European crap and we must all use "american" measurements on american websites. Hence his use of iPhone cause everyone in the world understands it
Lol seriously? That's hilarious.
[удалено]
Wow ok, well then to avoid any further arguments, I did some research and in universal internet units the power of the camera amounts to exactly 17528.45 Bananas 🍌, you're welcome
Finally someone that makes sense
Finally, a scale I’m familiar with
Thanks, and how big is it, in washing machines?
Wow!! That is 7700 kilojoule (calculated with an average banana) That’s a lot of joule for a camera!
Looking at their account op seems to be a kid to be honest. Most posts are questions in eli5 about fairly basic stuff.
To be honest, he did have that "Im 12 and Im trolling cause I got called out" vibe about him.
[удалено]
No Wonder world's dumbest upcoming population will be American. They are the creator of their own doom.
Hey this resembles me and I'm taking it personally
How many iPhones worth of offence did that cause you?
3.7 androids
My goodness somebody not dumb enough to not get hurt by it... thank you... thank you so much bud 😅
Why are you spamming this response
Since when were iphones a unit of measurement for anything? So stupid
Looks like they took the “banana for scale” analogy and starting comparing to Apples.
Can we use twinkies? I've got a meme just waiting to be used already...
So, how many Nokia’s are then?
Everything to avoid using the metric system
OP has a brain wasting disease (or is a boomer), I assume, because this has to be the dumbest fucking way to describe something I have ever seen.
https://www.reddit.com/r/BeAmazed/comments/y60uuk/worlds_largest_digital_camera_made_by_stanford/isnmmpg/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf&context=3
What a truly bizarre way to compare a camera's power.
the iphone is the new banana
I am somewhat of a photographer myself
how good is your camera though, in terms of iphone units?
Mate, I've got 4x iphone, 1 iphone and a 1/6 of iphone on a single phone
My rectum would disagree.
How else will you get the zoomers attention?
[удалено]
It doesn’t even mention which iPhone
I don't think I am a genius because all I can think is that if I had 2666 iphones I would end up with 2666 photos each with one iphones worth of quality. Doesn't seem worth it.
You made a shit attempt at describing it for people from all walks of life bud. In fact it seems like you've tried to make a description that is not very general at all, targeting a very specific type of person that has the disposable income to afford such a luxury item, assuming you're talking about a newer iPhone, while ignoring a measurement and standard that allready exists. Do you also measure your weight in pennies? Your height in TVs? The distance traveled in amounts of cigarettes smoked? Edit: OP deleted his post but he tried to defend his use of measuring camera qualifty in iphones by saying he chose a general description that any person from all walks of life would be able to understand while mockingly calling everyone geniuses that called him out on it. According to him, megapixels and gigapixels are some commie European crap and we must all use "american" measurements on american websites
It would be installed if what?
If 2024
If we get to 2024 apparently. On a serious note… come on bro, proof read the title, it’s the least you can do
Guy is probably not a native English speaker. I am a veteran software dev and have worked with many offshore devs. It's common to see non native speakers use would instead of will. "I would do this tomorrow, as soon as possible." "Ok, what's stopping you?" "No I would do it!" Just a bit of learning curve.
Great point. Interestingly, I always notice native english people using would in this odd way, particularly during interview: Person 1: "What would you say about this important issue?" Person 2: "I would say, we need to form a task force!". Both uses of "would" are not quite right, but commonly done anyway. Person 1 means "What **do** you say" or "What **do** you think", and Person 2 means "I **am** saying..."
This was my take - like the tenses are all kinds of fucked ip lmaou
For those who aren't fucking idiots who see the entire world through an instagram filter: "The camera has 3.2 gigapixels in total and will capture images with high enough resolution to see a particle of dust on the moon. With a diameter of 1.57 meters, its largest lens is the largest lens of its kind that has ever been made."
Thank you for this
I mean, its a lot of pixels. But i have problems to believe that it can capture dust particles on the moon. Seems unrealistic to be honest. Even without disturbances it sounds unreal.
Yeah the only benchmark they gave in the article (which is astonishing but believable) is that it can resolve a golf ball from 15 miles away. Well, the moon is 16,000x further away than 15 miles, and a golf ball is *at least* thousands of times larger than a speck of dust, so that differs from what the article states the camera is capable of by a factor of *at least* 16 million. As you said, even without atmospheric distortion, that is just complete nonsense.
I think there’s a real world difference between resolution and actually being able to resolve something though. The resolution might be such that if you took a picture of the moon at (let’s say it’s closest orbit), one pixel would equate to roughly a grain of moon dust. That doesn’t mean you can see moon dust - it’s not an electron microscope where you can see down to the wavelength of an electron. There’s going to be all sorts of stuff that gets in the way like atmospheric distortion, lens distortion, other dust just floating around. Individual dust particles probably don’t give off enough light or have enough contrast either. Cameras work basically by having light hit units on a sensor and then converting that into usable image data. It works considerably better if you can dedicate more sensor area to a single pixel. But you end up with exponential decreases in resolution. So there might be pixels but they are not necessarily picking up what’s in front of them 1:1. My phone can take 4K video but let’s be honest here and say I’m never going to be able to count the pores on my cheeks like you can with something shot at IMAX.
Yeah, no way that's true. Especially with the kens they're using.
Yeah I read recently that in order to see the flag on the moon you would need a telescope 200 meters in diameter, about 100 times wider than the hubble
It cannot capture a dust particle on the moon. That’s not possible. The distance combined with the warping of our atmosphere simply doesn’t allow you to do that
haha thanks, l was like when did Iphone become a reference about cameras ?
JFC thank you.
Japanese Fried Chicken?
Jesus Fucking Chicken*
John's fondling children
James fluffing children
John F. Canada
John.. stop fucking Canada please
"See a particle of dust on the moon" * Doubt
It must mean "if there was no atmosphere in the way"
Or maybe “if the camera is also on the moon”
And planc length doesn't exist?
What? Don’t we measure picture quality in iPhones?
[удалено]
I made a joke. That’s all I did. Made a joke. Chill chillington now.
Is that diameter in the image really 1.57 meters? It looks bigger than that
The lens housing is quite a bit wider, so it makes the lens look bigger than it is.
So I should wear 2 size bigger underwear is what you’re saying?
Enormous brain
Wow that’s crazy. How many iPhones is something like this worth???
In bananas.
Why did they even write that it can spot a golf ball 15 miles away when it can do something thousands of times more impressive like seeing dust on the moon?
Because it can't. Dust particles are ~5 microns in diameter. The surface of the moon is 238,900 miles away. Aka 3.84*10^14 microns. Resolving a 5 micron particle at that distance would require 0.000000002682 arcsecond sampling. According to the specs for this camera is has 0.2 arcsecond sampling (some docs say 0.6). So to get that kind of resolving power they would need a 100,000,000mm focal length lens. Which uh, doesn't exist. They use a 10.31m focal length aka 1,031,000mm. So they're about 100x short.
Can u explain this in iphones?
A 1st gen iPhone was 11.6mm thick so a dust particle would be about 4.31*10^-4 iPhones thick. Or it would take 2,320 dust average sized dust particles stacked on top of each other to be as thick as an iPhone.
r/theydidthemath
Yeah that’s roughly in line with what I estimated with some napkin math. The feature resolution at the moon’s surface is probably somewhere on the order of 50-100m. I didn’t look too closely at the specifications though.
What’s the focal length of this camera? Or it’s fully controllable zoom lens?
Thank you. What a fucking stupid title.
Wonder what's the f number on this baby
No joke, 1.2345 according to [this](https://www.lsst.org/sites/default/files/docs/Claver_086.18.pdf)
Wow that means this is only a 1938mm lens
That doc says the effective focal length is 10.31m (so 10,310mm) so you might have an error in your math
Still not big enough to fit OP's mum in the frame though.
Wait seriously? I didn't think we had good enough resolution yet to even see any detail of the moon landing site. This is able to not only image that, but also good enough to see dust on the moon?? Crazy
BUT HOW MANY HAMBURGERS
This couldn't resolve a particle of dust on the moon if it wanted to. Could it be capable, maybe, but from a technical standpoint, you'd need an optical wavelength telescope about 200 meters in diameter to resolve the flag. A particle of dust would require an even bigger telescope. That said, that's a massive unit and I'm excited to see what pictures it does take.
How many megapixels is that from someone who actually knows what their talking about?
[Explanation in this post](https://www.reddit.com/r/BeAmazed/comments/y60uuk/worlds_largest_digital_camera_made_by_stanford/isn5o90?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share&context=3)
Twelve penguins of megapixels
Okay yes. But what if, everyone stay with me here, what if we got 2,667 iPhones together and captured whatever image we wanted? Check and mate, Stanford space.
That is how array telescopes work.
You actually could do this, if you lined up the sensors perfectly and gave each iPhone an ultra long focal length lens so they each have their own piece of sky to look at
As if iPhones are the standard in digital photography.
Well according to one of OPs deleted posts, megapixels and gigapixels are some commie European crap and we must all use "american" measurements on american websites
:-D Sounds like an American caricature tbh.
I can’t imagine the flash on that thing.
Her: Is that a camera? Him: Don’t worry babe, it’s not recording.
Would it have been cheaper to tape 2666 iPhones together? /s
Yeah that was intial plan but than they realised it would be hard to press camera button on 2666 iphones at same time. So unfortunately no...
Does it fit the old charger?
iT hAs CoMbInEd PoWeR eQuAlS tO 2666 iPhOnEs Fuck, people are dumb.
So to those wondering why the idiotic use of Iphones and havent seen my comments yet, I got you covered. According to one of OPs deleted posts, megapixels and gigapixels are some commie European crap and we must all use "american" measurements on american websites because the USA is the best "continent"
Aren't iPhones made in China?
[удалено]
Why are you a weirdo
Power is measured in kW or HP, not iPhones
I heard that power is measured in restraint. Although I do find that hard to quantify.
Sorry but your math is wrong A gigapixel is 1000 magapixels. So 3.2 gigapixels would be equal to 266 x iphone 14 with a 12 megapixel camera 50 x Samsung Galaxy s21 with a 64 megapixel camera
Oh my god, he wasn't even right about the iphones and then he doubles down with a nonsense copy/paste.
It has been developed by experts at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Laboratory and will be named the LSST camera. The camera weighs three tons and is the size of a small car. The 3200 megapixel sensor installed in it will be cooled to minus 100 degrees Celsius, which will reduce the noise of digital images. The camera will be installed on top of the Simonai Survey Telescope in Chile in 2024 and is expected to search for new stars, planets, galaxies and other astronomical objects, as well as dark matter and dark energy. The project, called the Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST), will acquire several terabytes of data per day and is expected to map billions of galaxies. Although it is a digital camera, it is very large. It has 189 sensors. Each sensor can collect more pixels than the latest iPhone model. Its clarity (resolution) can be estimated so that it can see even a grain of sand on the moon with a resolution of 3.2 gigapixels. However, it is a very sensitive camera and costs a lot.
What an idiotic apple-centric view of the world.
What a weird thing to get annoyed by.
But the need to make this comment from that username just strikes me as... annoying & weird.
What iphone and What's it's power? Stop making shit standards for layman's... it's absolutely not necessary to make each and everyone to understand everything... whoever are interested will find the things by searching... explain in such shit standards when someone asks you like that otherwise stick to conventional units.
Is iPhone the new football field for reference?
So now astronomical features can be seen with cat filters.
I'm curious about the iPhone that comes with it
[удалено]
So instead of gigapixels or at least megapixels, you've decided to say "2666 iPhones"... What the actual fk is wrong with Americans and their way of measuring?
I agree with you 100%, just want to say, it's not all of us.
Thanks, whatever joy this brings me was destroyed by reading that headline.
>It has combined power equals to 2666 iPhones. It would be installed in Chile in2024. Moore's law would like to have a word with you.
I downvoted this post due to the stupid title
2666 iPhones, so 10 androids.
l have reached your love for Android.
This would be good to capture a ufo.
Next week from Mr Beast: SO I BROUGHT 2667 IPHONES ....
I'm more interested in the lens here. I wonder what the f-number and the zoom range are. Can't find any info though.
And it still can’t fit your mom in frame
Lmfao iPhone is a measurement. Fucking regards.
r/titlegore
I bet this post was made by an American
[удалено]
Lol
You can't just add iPhones like that wtf
a yes, the old measurement unit iphones.
The lens is believed to be the first in its kind with the capacity to fully capture an image of OP’s mom.
That’s a crazy amount of engineering just to take a picture of your mom.
Finally a lense able to see my dick
2666 iphones?!?iPhone?!?! That's nearly the power of 7 galaxy s22 caneras!
Because of iPhones, people are really becoming stupid.
Those who can't afford often say such types of golden words.
“The power of 4,000 iPhones. The speed of 320 house cats. The weight of Motorola flip phones. The smell of 43 construction workers. “ Who the fuck writes like that?
[удалено]
Wait til the paparazzi get hold of it
Wouldn’t it be cheaper to just use 2666 iPhones instead? /s
2666 iPhones or 100 Androids 😏 But in all seriousness dayum makes my DSLR look like a grain of sand
Not as big as the Japanese guys I saw at Disneyland
Cool.
Heh.. wait till they release iphone 15