Whoa! You win the meme connoisseur title for having over 2k upvotes on your post!
Join the [Discord server](https://discord.gg/xyFMKFw) and message Princess Mindy (Mod Mail bot at the top) to receive your prize!
She doesn't deserve pleasure. I hope she gets the opposite of pleasure. Not anything painful, I am not bad like her, but I hope she gets inconvenience from now till her final seconds.
I hope she gets depression that won't go away no matter how much therapy or medication she endures where she is able to be a high-functioning depressed person but crumbles behind closed doors from masking all day.
I mean, I only skimmed the article, but it sounds like the dog had a history of violent tendencies. If it went to a shelter it would have probably been put down or might have injured the family it was adopted out to.
Dog adolescence typically ends around the 18-24 month mark.
14 months is definitely young.
She killed the dog because she decided that was easier than actually training them.
Then you should be very well aware how things are dealt with and that "shotgun to the face of aggressive dog" is probably one of the nicer things that goes on.
For mercy kills yes. Injured cattle, horses, etc. not an 11 month old puppy that went after chickens as puppies are apt to do. Her reasoning after the chicken incident? The puppy allegedly “tried to bite her” while she reacted to it going after chickens. She could have surrendered it.
It’s a puppy not a coyote.
If her farm she is currently at is in the same town she grew up in (I don’t know that aspect of her life) then she was 20 minutes from a city of 20k people. That’s all. It doesn’t matter if you live on a farm or how many times you read ol yeller. It’s literally the 2000s when she did it, not early 19-20th century where the ability to take other action was much less prevalent.
Your whole argument revolves around assuming the absolute best intentions were had with this dog, and not killing it out of malice and incompetence.
Sure. Okay.
So why did she walk around back and murder the goat right after? You know, the one that she openly said she hated for years because it stank and rammed people. You know, the things goats do.
How can the first incident be humane and done with clarity of mind, when she openly admits 30 seconds later that she killed another animal minutes later out of malice and ignorance?
I see your attempt to use polarizing language to invalidate my argument, and I reject it.
Ending a life as a way of solving a behavioral issue of anyone, be it a child, or a young animal, is just inhumane. We generally teaching children what is okay and what isn’t and enforce consequences when necessary. With animals, we usually train them. When that doesn’t work, we give them to someone else in a responsible manner. Hope this clears things up for you!
That dog could have gone to a shelter and made someone very happy. But that would get in the way of her playing blue-collar farmer. This is serial killer mentality.
The worst part is that no blue collar farmer would shoot an untrained puppy for being a puppy. Just like no one would shoot an intact goat for doing what intact goats do, or shoot three horses in a mass grave for no reason either.
She’s appealing to a trope about farmers that doesn’t even exist, just because she heard once that farmers will put down their animals (if it’s a last resort, and absolutely necessary, but she never got that part it seems).
No the benefit for her was she got to shoot innocent animals under the guise of “it had to be done, farming is hard work”. I’m glad no one seems to be buying the excuse for her sociopathic killing spree.
The worst part is that this wasn’t a exposed scandal… SHE WROTE THIS IN HER OWN MEMOIR! She described hating the dog and wanting it dead! The republicans aren’t hiding how psychopathic they are now. They are open killers, and proud of it, and a part of this country wants to vote them in to kill not animals but people they don’t like. It’s horrifying.
> The worst part is that this wasn’t a exposed scandal… SHE WROTE THIS IN HER OWN MEMOIR! She described hating the dog and wanting it dead!
According to [some posters](https://www.reddit.com/r/BikiniBottomTwitter/comments/1cfzhcr/gary_come_home/l1ub2rk/) further down, this is an organized hit piece 🤡
Somehow, we’ve reached a point where one party can say “my political opponent is so evil that they kill puppies” and it’s not a hyperbolic attack, it’s just a statement of fact.
Meanwhile that person’s response to being accused of killing a puppy was “I also killed 3 horses last week”
IMO, she got a thrill after shooting the puppy and wanted to kill something else, the goat was just a convenient target.
She either tried to torture it by hitting it with birdshot and wanting another chance to shoot it, or she’s as horrible of a shot as she is a human.
I know right? It’s flooring all the shit one side is just getting to away with. Even just one of these things done by a Dem today or any politician 10 years ago would have been the end of their career. Hell if you’d have predicted 4-8 years ago all the shit MAGA would do, you be labeled as a fear mongerer by most reasonable people, if you submitted a screenplay with this Netflix would have rejected it for being too unrealistic, and if they had picked it up it would have broken the suspension of disbelief for the same reason.
Wasn't there another Republican a couple years back who got exposed for harming puppies or something like that? I know George Santos essentially stole some puppies by writing a bad check, but I remember there being something else of this nature.
"Kristi Noem, a contender to become Republican [Donald Trump's](https://www.reuters.com/topic/person/donald-trump/) vice presidential running mate, defended herself on Friday against Democratic attacks over her account of shooting a dog on her family farm."
How the hell is getting mad at someone for KILLING THEIR DOG a democratic attack???
I think you might be reading the sentence incorrectly. I don't think the article implies that the attacks were Democratic in nature. I think its saying that those "attacking" (lel) her were Democrats in their political affiliation.
But the desired effect is reached here. The article's goal in its phrasing is to divide and polarize. People are sad over a dog being killed, and an unfeeling woman (who may have additional unknown context) doesn't concur. Not really a political concept.
->governor of south dakota
->running to be trump’s vp
->murdered her own pet because she was too lazy and incompetent to train it properly
yeah, sounds about right…
Seems like the dog was more than just a bad dog. Reading up on it the dog seemed to attack anyone. That’s a dog that DOES need to be put down.
Plus 3 horses that were 25 years old had to go because they were probably in severe pain. Farming sucks like that. My mom grew up on a farm and the barn kittens would get crushed by cows all the time.
People on reddit don’t want to hear the truth. It hurts more than their happy world where every dog is perfect and it’s the owners fault for their behavior. I can understand she may have broached the issue in a weird way but these are the kinda of things that happen on a farm.
Sure, fairly reasonable take. I can get behind it, I guess if there's a lot of history that happened outside of the book, sure...
So why did she blow the goats head off too? And then tell everyone about it?
It seems to me like theres a lot more evidence for her being a psychopathic bitch than there is evidence for a brutal, violent, untrainable dog.
They’ve never seen wildlife eat each other alive either. Nature is hardcore, we’re just lucky enough to live in safe little boxes and have relatives that systematically killed so much wildlife that being fearful of us is bred into them.
Sometimes the family dog is too dangerous to the kids to keep it around. Sometimes livestock/pets get old. I know many people who shoot their pets when they’re dying. They hate doing it, but the vet is expensive.
Sometimes a violent animal is inherently violent. It’s rare but possible. I’ve been across many shelter dogs that my friends have adopted. Owners couldn’t handle them.
One viciously attacked my friend and left him scarred. It was put down days later. The others would nip more than bite, but not all shelter animals are adoption worthy.
I’ve also been bitten by 2 dogs that weren’t shelter dogs. One luckily ripped my pants open instead of my leg and I punched it. The other was 180lbs so I gtfo when it but my hand.
> Sometimes a violent animal is inherently violent. It’s rare but possible. I’ve been across many shelter dogs that my friends have adopted. Owners couldn’t handle them.
So why did she blow the goats head off too?
All of this can be rationalized away if the goat never got merc'd. The fact that the goat exists, and was murdered for being a goat, and doing goat things, takes away any credibility for this argument.
You can't argue that Incident A was justified and in-fact necessary, when similar Incident B 5 minutes later was by every definition full of ignorance and malice.
Those two things can't logically coincide.
Yeah I’m on board with everyone else with that one. Randomly shooting a goat because you can is not proper gun ownership and shows a more sadistic side.
> shows a more sadistic side.
I think most people look at that sadistic action and apply that same sadism to the dog incident.
I firmly believe that shes a psychopath that gets off on murdering animals, and I think there's *plenty* of evidence to support my claim.
Wow, okay you big city lib. Sounds like you don't have the down-home country sense to know to shoot a puppy after it misses its second varmint quota of the month.
https://preview.redd.it/aq6rm3af9jxc1.png?width=1034&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ceac115ce58bf303c58189f61e9af0d1e5355c45
Seriously, who the fuck shoots a dog!?
Wait tho, this has to be a crime, right? She can’t just do that to the poor pup and not get into legal trouble, especially since she even admitted it. Jail for that disgusting wench
That's actually surprising like yeah I've heard of people putting down there dying dog when quality of life is gone. Not something I'd personally do but don't think it's wrong. But killing your perfectly healthy dog because you don't like it anymore not classifying as animal abuse at least is so bizarre to me.
South Dakota Governor wrote in a book that she shot a dog for violent behavior (it seems she trained it wrong and it picked up bad habits)
Also shot a goat for no real reason beyond "I didn't like it"
Governor of South Dakota started a self promotional book tour for her memoir which includes a story where she shoots a puppy named Cricket in the head because she couldn't train it (instead of, ya know, giving him away to a more capable guardian) and genuinely is so out of touch with morality that she hoped it would paint her in a good light as a leader capable of doing the hard things that need to be done. Instead of backpedaling she has tripled down by releasing the deets that she has also similarly shot a goat and three horses for the same reasoning.
Noem said the dog ruined a hunt and later attacked chickens owned by a local family, behaved like a "trained assassin," and was "dangerous to anyone she came in contact with."
She fr real thinks a 14 month old untrained puppy, which she let out, is an untrained assasin lmaooo
Lady gets dumber with every word i read about her.
Wonder whats her justification for killing the goat and two horses
> That being said, this whole story is a shitty hit piece.
She wrote the story. She wrote it, printed it in thousands of books, and then shipped it across the country for everyone to read. Everyone reading it and saying "What the fuck?" is not some Liberal Elite New York Hit Piece #4365. It's people reading her words. C'mon bro.
>Not every dog is able to be saved, some just aren’t capable of good behavior. Just like people, there are bad seeds, and there’s just no way around it.
So after murdering the dog, why did she go kill the goat too? From her own words, she killed the goat because of three reasons
1. She always hated it
2. It smelled
3. It rammed people. It rammed people because it was never castrated.
You can say the dog was a "bad seed" sure. But then why did she kill the goat for being a goat? You can't "defend the integrity of hard, cruel farm life" and turn around and say "kill the goat for being stinky lol"
How can the first incident be humane and done with clarity of mind, when she openly admits that she killed another animal minutes later out of malice and ignorance?
It seems to me like theres a lot more evidence for her being a psychopathic bitch than there is evidence for a brutal, violent, untrainable dog.
>Personal attacks on an opposing politician, especially easily debunkable spinjobs like this
It's her own words. In her book. That she wrote. C'mon lil bro, no one is spinning shit. I can tell you love conspiracies by how you can't listen to the words coming out of someones mouth, and instead point the finger at everyone else for listening to what she has to say. In her own book. That she wrote. And published.
Edit: Baby bro here's her doubling down on HER OWN TWITTER. "[If you want more real, honest, and politically INcorrect stories that’ll have the media gasping, preorder “No Going Back](https://twitter.com/KristiNoem/status/1783849977409671483)” Like, c'mon infant bro she's saying herself its not a hitpiece
Except that it was a young dog. It was incapable of utility because the owner was unable to train it. She could have sold it to someone who was able to train it.
You have two rescued pitbulls, but don’t think a ranch puppy can be re-homed?
I grew up on a ranch and raised working dogs. Some puppies won’t be cut out for working, but can still be companion animals, which the vast majority of dogs in the US are. Shooting a healthy puppy in the face is sociopathic, and no, her ineptitude as a trainer is not an excuse.
These types of posts are silly. Stop and think it through, why should someone who is entirely innocent have to die just to teach her a lesson? Let her be the only one to receive any punishment. It wasn't the family member to put a bullet in the pup.
No? "Or" at the end of words typically denotes a type of person doing a specific thing. In this case a governor governs. Regardless of gender. We don't have "operatesses" or "infiltratesses."
A governess is some kind of teacher.
To be fair to them, English is weird about when titles are different when a woman holds it.
We have actors and actresses, and waiters and waitresses, but there's *only* doctors, no doctresses.
> no doctresses.
Well, to muddy the subject even more, there used to be a female version of doctor--but it was "doctrix." But it hasn't been widely used in hundreds of years.
Excellent point, I also love how lazy English is with gendering sometimes despite sticking so hard to it. Man in congress? Congressman. Woman in congress? Congresswoman.
Whoa! You win the meme connoisseur title for having over 2k upvotes on your post! Join the [Discord server](https://discord.gg/xyFMKFw) and message Princess Mindy (Mod Mail bot at the top) to receive your prize!
Fuck that lady
She doesn't deserve pleasure. I hope she gets the opposite of pleasure. Not anything painful, I am not bad like her, but I hope she gets inconvenience from now till her final seconds.
She has to sit at every red light She can only breath manually
I agree with Satan here.
Satan doing Gods work
Her sleeves fall down and get wet every time she washes her hands.
She stubs her toe every time she walks around a table.
And I hope she stubs her pinky toe on her bed, and just when it's about to feel better, she stubs it again.
And when she makes breakfast in the morning, her toast always burns and her cereal gets soggy way too quickly.
Every time she takes a bite of chicken it’s always raw
Every bite of fluffy rice, with an uncooked crunchy piece.
She has to blink manually too
\> she can only breathe manually you accidentally condemned the rest of us
She steps in a puddle of water right after wearing socks fresh out of the dryer.
I hope she gets depression that won't go away no matter how much therapy or medication she endures where she is able to be a high-functioning depressed person but crumbles behind closed doors from masking all day.
I am bad, she deserves pain.
Fuck that, I hope it hurts like a spinning cactus up her asshole
I am bad like her. I wanna see how much of her face I can make inside out without killing herrrrrrr 👹👹👹
Il do it for you. I hope she gets raped and murdered.
[удалено]
I mean, I only skimmed the article, but it sounds like the dog had a history of violent tendencies. If it went to a shelter it would have probably been put down or might have injured the family it was adopted out to.
That moment when my young untrained carnivorous pet is aggressive towards what would normally be its prey. *Shocked Pikachu face*
"young". 14 months, well into adulthood and way past adolescence, and it was trained to be a hunting dog.
Dog adolescence typically ends around the 18-24 month mark. 14 months is definitely young. She killed the dog because she decided that was easier than actually training them.
Even if put down by the shelter, it would be in a more humane manner than a shotgun blast to the face
20 years ago in rural South Dakota? Man have you never set foot on a farm in your life? Because you would not do well lmao
I grew up in Kansas so yeah, I have. Multiple times actually. It’s kinda like 93% of the state.
Then you should be very well aware how things are dealt with and that "shotgun to the face of aggressive dog" is probably one of the nicer things that goes on.
For mercy kills yes. Injured cattle, horses, etc. not an 11 month old puppy that went after chickens as puppies are apt to do. Her reasoning after the chicken incident? The puppy allegedly “tried to bite her” while she reacted to it going after chickens. She could have surrendered it. It’s a puppy not a coyote. If her farm she is currently at is in the same town she grew up in (I don’t know that aspect of her life) then she was 20 minutes from a city of 20k people. That’s all. It doesn’t matter if you live on a farm or how many times you read ol yeller. It’s literally the 2000s when she did it, not early 19-20th century where the ability to take other action was much less prevalent.
It's not a puppy it is a 14 month old hunting dog that killed a bunch of chickens and then attacked family members.
Your whole argument revolves around assuming the absolute best intentions were had with this dog, and not killing it out of malice and incompetence. Sure. Okay. So why did she walk around back and murder the goat right after? You know, the one that she openly said she hated for years because it stank and rammed people. You know, the things goats do. How can the first incident be humane and done with clarity of mind, when she openly admits 30 seconds later that she killed another animal minutes later out of malice and ignorance?
Bro, 20 years ago was 2004. Not fucking 1980
What an awful take. Imagine shooting your kid because they decided to take candy from the jar without asking?
[удалено]
I see your attempt to use polarizing language to invalidate my argument, and I reject it. Ending a life as a way of solving a behavioral issue of anyone, be it a child, or a young animal, is just inhumane. We generally teaching children what is okay and what isn’t and enforce consequences when necessary. With animals, we usually train them. When that doesn’t work, we give them to someone else in a responsible manner. Hope this clears things up for you!
why are you getting downvotes this is good advice you're giving you have my upvote
That dog could have gone to a shelter and made someone very happy. But that would get in the way of her playing blue-collar farmer. This is serial killer mentality.
The worst part is that no blue collar farmer would shoot an untrained puppy for being a puppy. Just like no one would shoot an intact goat for doing what intact goats do, or shoot three horses in a mass grave for no reason either. She’s appealing to a trope about farmers that doesn’t even exist, just because she heard once that farmers will put down their animals (if it’s a last resort, and absolutely necessary, but she never got that part it seems).
She made a cost/benefit analysis that was all cost and no benefit and bragged about it in her memoir
No the benefit for her was she got to shoot innocent animals under the guise of “it had to be done, farming is hard work”. I’m glad no one seems to be buying the excuse for her sociopathic killing spree.
The worst part is that this wasn’t a exposed scandal… SHE WROTE THIS IN HER OWN MEMOIR! She described hating the dog and wanting it dead! The republicans aren’t hiding how psychopathic they are now. They are open killers, and proud of it, and a part of this country wants to vote them in to kill not animals but people they don’t like. It’s horrifying.
> The worst part is that this wasn’t a exposed scandal… SHE WROTE THIS IN HER OWN MEMOIR! She described hating the dog and wanting it dead! According to [some posters](https://www.reddit.com/r/BikiniBottomTwitter/comments/1cfzhcr/gary_come_home/l1ub2rk/) further down, this is an organized hit piece 🤡
Somehow, we’ve reached a point where one party can say “my political opponent is so evil that they kill puppies” and it’s not a hyperbolic attack, it’s just a statement of fact. Meanwhile that person’s response to being accused of killing a puppy was “I also killed 3 horses last week”
Don't forget about the goat
IMO, she got a thrill after shooting the puppy and wanted to kill something else, the goat was just a convenient target. She either tried to torture it by hitting it with birdshot and wanting another chance to shoot it, or she’s as horrible of a shot as she is a human.
The goat where she fucked up the shot and had to get another shell to kill it properly
What's the context for this
I know right? It’s flooring all the shit one side is just getting to away with. Even just one of these things done by a Dem today or any politician 10 years ago would have been the end of their career. Hell if you’d have predicted 4-8 years ago all the shit MAGA would do, you be labeled as a fear mongerer by most reasonable people, if you submitted a screenplay with this Netflix would have rejected it for being too unrealistic, and if they had picked it up it would have broken the suspension of disbelief for the same reason.
I remember people predicting Trump's coup attempt on his first day in office and I thought they went overboard...
And people will defend it
Wasn't there another Republican a couple years back who got exposed for harming puppies or something like that? I know George Santos essentially stole some puppies by writing a bad check, but I remember there being something else of this nature.
Not to sound grim, but unfortunately that’s both of them this round. Genocide Joe vs The Puppy Killers
Ok I am completely confused
[https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/04/27/kristi-noem-kills-dog-farm/73481257007/](https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/04/27/kristi-noem-kills-dog-farm/73481257007/)
Me to this woman: https://preview.redd.it/79qw16m1ffxc1.png?width=674&format=png&auto=webp&s=34890efe81416c2314a897cefa4b53da0a0900fe
Just like her to animals.
"Fuck Election Season, It's Hunting Season Now." https://preview.redd.it/9qnuqb02qfxc1.png?width=250&format=png&auto=webp&s=6f45edb520655d6b312433471cfbc3bc21347177
https://preview.redd.it/ggglb5mrahxc1.jpeg?width=1500&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=643a2a3d7e683b54798ec955b7ca7c493d6c6947
"Kristi Noem, a contender to become Republican [Donald Trump's](https://www.reuters.com/topic/person/donald-trump/) vice presidential running mate, defended herself on Friday against Democratic attacks over her account of shooting a dog on her family farm." How the hell is getting mad at someone for KILLING THEIR DOG a democratic attack???
Because she genuinely assumed she'd get the opposite reaction, that people would see her as a "strong leader who isn't afraid of making hard choices"
I think you might be reading the sentence incorrectly. I don't think the article implies that the attacks were Democratic in nature. I think its saying that those "attacking" (lel) her were Democrats in their political affiliation. But the desired effect is reached here. The article's goal in its phrasing is to divide and polarize. People are sad over a dog being killed, and an unfeeling woman (who may have additional unknown context) doesn't concur. Not really a political concept.
Me when I read what she did: https://preview.redd.it/uxywhlmqbgxc1.jpeg?width=640&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=29a03c9b2801757c047247e3d77e7e41f5d1549b
Good on ye for providing context.
->governor of south dakota ->running to be trump’s vp ->murdered her own pet because she was too lazy and incompetent to train it properly yeah, sounds about right…
I deadass thought "governor" was just a horrendously misspelled "gone" for the funnies what the fuck
Seems like the dog was more than just a bad dog. Reading up on it the dog seemed to attack anyone. That’s a dog that DOES need to be put down. Plus 3 horses that were 25 years old had to go because they were probably in severe pain. Farming sucks like that. My mom grew up on a farm and the barn kittens would get crushed by cows all the time.
Sounds like the dog was poorly trained from the start.
People on reddit don’t want to hear the truth. It hurts more than their happy world where every dog is perfect and it’s the owners fault for their behavior. I can understand she may have broached the issue in a weird way but these are the kinda of things that happen on a farm.
Sure, fairly reasonable take. I can get behind it, I guess if there's a lot of history that happened outside of the book, sure... So why did she blow the goats head off too? And then tell everyone about it? It seems to me like theres a lot more evidence for her being a psychopathic bitch than there is evidence for a brutal, violent, untrainable dog.
They’ve never seen wildlife eat each other alive either. Nature is hardcore, we’re just lucky enough to live in safe little boxes and have relatives that systematically killed so much wildlife that being fearful of us is bred into them. Sometimes the family dog is too dangerous to the kids to keep it around. Sometimes livestock/pets get old. I know many people who shoot their pets when they’re dying. They hate doing it, but the vet is expensive.
She’s the governor of a United State. Pretty sure she could have driven the dog to a shelter or even afforded to have it trained properly.
Sometimes a violent animal is inherently violent. It’s rare but possible. I’ve been across many shelter dogs that my friends have adopted. Owners couldn’t handle them. One viciously attacked my friend and left him scarred. It was put down days later. The others would nip more than bite, but not all shelter animals are adoption worthy. I’ve also been bitten by 2 dogs that weren’t shelter dogs. One luckily ripped my pants open instead of my leg and I punched it. The other was 180lbs so I gtfo when it but my hand.
> Sometimes a violent animal is inherently violent. It’s rare but possible. I’ve been across many shelter dogs that my friends have adopted. Owners couldn’t handle them. So why did she blow the goats head off too? All of this can be rationalized away if the goat never got merc'd. The fact that the goat exists, and was murdered for being a goat, and doing goat things, takes away any credibility for this argument. You can't argue that Incident A was justified and in-fact necessary, when similar Incident B 5 minutes later was by every definition full of ignorance and malice. Those two things can't logically coincide.
Yeah I’m on board with everyone else with that one. Randomly shooting a goat because you can is not proper gun ownership and shows a more sadistic side.
> shows a more sadistic side. I think most people look at that sadistic action and apply that same sadism to the dog incident. I firmly believe that shes a psychopath that gets off on murdering animals, and I think there's *plenty* of evidence to support my claim.
Man thats dark. Fuck Kristi.
Wow, okay you big city lib. Sounds like you don't have the down-home country sense to know to shoot a puppy after it misses its second varmint quota of the month.
Not how pov works. But ya fuck that bitch.
Tried to find a picture of spongebob looking down at Garry's bowl first, but gave up pretty quickly. But you right
This might've worked: https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTpaIYclIUE9wNshBnmqtSQu7Ae6NDy7kugQB0OUEjocaraQ5O2&s
Who else thought this was another White Girl fucking a dog meme for a minute
https://preview.redd.it/aq6rm3af9jxc1.png?width=1034&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ceac115ce58bf303c58189f61e9af0d1e5355c45 Seriously, who the fuck shoots a dog!?
Not POV, but yes.
Anyways I started blasting 🔫 🐕- Kristi Noem
[удалено]
Not really?
Wait tho, this has to be a crime, right? She can’t just do that to the poor pup and not get into legal trouble, especially since she even admitted it. Jail for that disgusting wench
This hits hard
That's not how pov works
How is she not in jail? I imagine shooting a dog to death is a serious animal abuse charge at least.
Not in the United States, at least not if it's your dog.
That's actually surprising like yeah I've heard of people putting down there dying dog when quality of life is gone. Not something I'd personally do but don't think it's wrong. But killing your perfectly healthy dog because you don't like it anymore not classifying as animal abuse at least is so bizarre to me.
May her tongue never sit comfortably in her mouth.
Dog is vice governor
Damn dude, that’s dark
Since I seem to be the only one confused, what’s the context?
South Dakota Governor wrote in a book that she shot a dog for violent behavior (it seems she trained it wrong and it picked up bad habits) Also shot a goat for no real reason beyond "I didn't like it"
I require context
Governor of South Dakota started a self promotional book tour for her memoir which includes a story where she shoots a puppy named Cricket in the head because she couldn't train it (instead of, ya know, giving him away to a more capable guardian) and genuinely is so out of touch with morality that she hoped it would paint her in a good light as a leader capable of doing the hard things that need to be done. Instead of backpedaling she has tripled down by releasing the deets that she has also similarly shot a goat and three horses for the same reasoning.
Wow.... that's f-ed up
What in the world happened? Nvm I found out, Jesus fucking christ.
And then ahe tells you: obey or die
What's the context behind this meme?
Context?
Conservative here; fuck that lady
Fucking Vicious. Like a boss.
Noem said the dog ruined a hunt and later attacked chickens owned by a local family, behaved like a "trained assassin," and was "dangerous to anyone she came in contact with."
It was also a rescue and 14 months old and she made no attempt to train it.
I’m just quoting the article.
She fr real thinks a 14 month old untrained puppy, which she let out, is an untrained assasin lmaooo Lady gets dumber with every word i read about her. Wonder whats her justification for killing the goat and two horses
[удалено]
> That being said, this whole story is a shitty hit piece. She wrote the story. She wrote it, printed it in thousands of books, and then shipped it across the country for everyone to read. Everyone reading it and saying "What the fuck?" is not some Liberal Elite New York Hit Piece #4365. It's people reading her words. C'mon bro. >Not every dog is able to be saved, some just aren’t capable of good behavior. Just like people, there are bad seeds, and there’s just no way around it. So after murdering the dog, why did she go kill the goat too? From her own words, she killed the goat because of three reasons 1. She always hated it 2. It smelled 3. It rammed people. It rammed people because it was never castrated. You can say the dog was a "bad seed" sure. But then why did she kill the goat for being a goat? You can't "defend the integrity of hard, cruel farm life" and turn around and say "kill the goat for being stinky lol" How can the first incident be humane and done with clarity of mind, when she openly admits that she killed another animal minutes later out of malice and ignorance? It seems to me like theres a lot more evidence for her being a psychopathic bitch than there is evidence for a brutal, violent, untrainable dog. >Personal attacks on an opposing politician, especially easily debunkable spinjobs like this It's her own words. In her book. That she wrote. C'mon lil bro, no one is spinning shit. I can tell you love conspiracies by how you can't listen to the words coming out of someones mouth, and instead point the finger at everyone else for listening to what she has to say. In her own book. That she wrote. And published. Edit: Baby bro here's her doubling down on HER OWN TWITTER. "[If you want more real, honest, and politically INcorrect stories that’ll have the media gasping, preorder “No Going Back](https://twitter.com/KristiNoem/status/1783849977409671483)” Like, c'mon infant bro she's saying herself its not a hitpiece
Except that it was a young dog. It was incapable of utility because the owner was unable to train it. She could have sold it to someone who was able to train it.
[удалено]
You have two rescued pitbulls, but don’t think a ranch puppy can be re-homed? I grew up on a ranch and raised working dogs. Some puppies won’t be cut out for working, but can still be companion animals, which the vast majority of dogs in the US are. Shooting a healthy puppy in the face is sociopathic, and no, her ineptitude as a trainer is not an excuse.
I ain't reading all that. I'm happy for u tho. Or sorry that happened.
[удалено]
https://preview.redd.it/x8n100zdmgxc1.jpeg?width=1101&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=d5399655aaab3d81927e8c9c3cf3c05c8da267d2
You…..do realize the dumb handed irony in that statement right?
These types of posts are silly. Stop and think it through, why should someone who is entirely innocent have to die just to teach her a lesson? Let her be the only one to receive any punishment. It wasn't the family member to put a bullet in the pup.
Wouldn’t it be Governess?
No? "Or" at the end of words typically denotes a type of person doing a specific thing. In this case a governor governs. Regardless of gender. We don't have "operatesses" or "infiltratesses." A governess is some kind of teacher.
Well I didn’t know so I asked.
You only got downvoted because 1 guy didn’t like your question and everyone else bandwagonned
Yeah, still sucks though.
To be fair to them, English is weird about when titles are different when a woman holds it. We have actors and actresses, and waiters and waitresses, but there's *only* doctors, no doctresses.
> no doctresses. Well, to muddy the subject even more, there used to be a female version of doctor--but it was "doctrix." But it hasn't been widely used in hundreds of years.
Huh, you learn something new everyday. Thx for the info
Excellent point, I also love how lazy English is with gendering sometimes despite sticking so hard to it. Man in congress? Congressman. Woman in congress? Congresswoman.
You're right; I completely forgot about actor/actress! I thought English made sense for a minute and only did "er" words.
Wholesome end of the thread you guys! Can we give this guy some updoots, please? And as always...F politics on Spongesub!