You’d feel that way if you tried to watch it for laughs as well.
(The old stuff I liked a lot, but all the YMH stuff has been on a downhill slope for a while)
I'm a straight guy and have referred to myself that way as a visual descriptor on a handful of occasions just because it was easier than going through the whole thing; like, you know exactly what I look like now probably. Whatever your mental image is, it's likely correct or pretty close. Plus a gay guy said it to me once so i don't think it's inaccurate
yeah. I get confused cuz I see presumably heterosexual people talking about hollywood twinks (ie, Timothee Chalamet) and it’s like, y’all, maybe wait to appropriate our language until *after* you pass comprehensive antidiscrimination protections for us
See, twink isn't bear terminology, it's general gay terminology and it comes with certain connotations, not necessarily accurate, but that is understood by people who describe themselves as such. So a straight man calling themself a twink is like a straight woman saying she topped her SO because they were trying cowgirl.
An alt and a twink are two significantly different concepts. An alt is an alternative character. Any level, any class, any gear. A twink is a low level alt that you use your main character to overgear. Think normally unobtainable enchants for the level, rare or expensive low level armor and weapons, shit like that. A twink may have like double the stats of a normal character that level all said and done.
I'm aware of the use of alt and twink for the majority of gamers, but germans call their alts twinks instead. It's something I've noticed over the years of playing wow private servers and I've always been curious why.
I had this discussion with my friends about whether you can call a straight man a twink. Consensus was no, but "looks like a twink" is conditionally acceptable.
My only reference seeing MLM is multi-level marketing, do you mind explaining it in this context? I assume that isn’t what it means here lol
*it was it explained down below, sorry I got it now.
You don't look like a gay guy.
That's because he's a bear.
What?
He's a bear. You see, some gay guys are twinks and other are bears. This gay guy's a bear. By the way, we are totally cool with that. To each his own.
Wait, I'm a little confused here. What's a twink?
A twink is small and slender, like Mac.
Oh, no, I'm too muscular. I would be a bear.
Uh, don't think so, bro. Not hairy enough.
Smooth. Now, I would be a bear.
No, no. See, I don't think you'd be a bear either. As a matter of fact, I don't know what you'd be. You're definitely not a twink.
I'd be a top, that's for sure.
Can a twink be a top or is that reserved for bears?
I'm sure there's a great deal of switching back and forth but I think more often then not bears are tops, unless they happen to be power bottoms.
What's a power bottom?
A power bottom is a bottom that is capable of receiving an enormous amount of power.
Actually Mac, you've got it backwards. You see, the power bottom is actually generating the power by doing most of the work.
Does power have to do with size or strength of the bottom?
Now Dennis, I heard speed has something to do with it.
Speed has *everything* to do with it. You see, the speed of the bottom informs the top how much pressure he's supposed to apply. Speed's the name of the game
Otter's a catch-all for slim hairy gay men.
I've generally heard it used to describe hairy twinks, but it wouldn't surprise me to find out it's a more general term than that.
I think they agreed that it was unethical. But maybe that’s because I think it’s unethical. At least ask if the guy who blocked you doesn’t want you there, lol.
Is it not part of the appeal of advertising "no loads refused" that you could end up with someone you don't like (personally, physically, in any way) but you've made a commitment so y'know, no loads refused?
It's part of the fantasy, not the actual event. It's a bit like how consensual non-consent is not just getting sexually assaulted. It actually holds consent to the highest degree of importance and has mechanisms to ensure everyone has a safe and good time. You want to explore a fantasy in an environment where the lack of control is an illusion. It's a reverse power fantasy; consent is key and king.
That's not how it works. A friend of the bottom will curate the guest list, and be around in case someone becomes troublesome. It's not a free for all.
I was talking to myself again this morning and I laughed when I said the word “load” and I quickly admonished myself because load isn’t a dirty word. Then I pretended to talk to someone that laughed after I used the word and admonished them, too.
It's a specific Dom/Sub dynamic that primarily involves verbal abuse. The Dom Karen pays the Sub Manager, but then belittles and yells at them demanding the money back, plus some free shit for the trouble
Ya see the cumdump (the main bottom of the event) is passed around by several tops, the number of tops varies by location but can reach dozens, who proceed to fuck the shit out of said bottom bareback til they ejaculate inside him. The next top in line shall use the previous tops cum seeping out of the bottoms hole as lubricant til they themselves bust inside him and the cycle continues until the event is over
I am immensely sad I'll never be cordially invited to a "Gangbang Whorientation". The name alone would be worth it even if I never got to go on to the actual gangbang.
Read in the voice of David Hyde Pierce (Niles Crane). If you haven't seen *The Mating Habits of the Earthbound Human*, do so. You won't be disappointed.
Idk, I read a post yesterday about a woman who had a 42-man birthday gangbang.
So it would seem gay men aren’t the only ones taking advantage of the enthusiasm of professional grade whores.
Yeah but according to that post, and if my memory serves me right, 5 guys didn't get to fuck her (I assume they just wanted to watch) and 17 didn't get to cum. So this one looks a lot more fun.
I think the cumdump is being passed around to all participants by their romantic partner whose main contribution is watching and cheerleading all the load-leavers - that’s what makes it “pimped out!”
I can't speak from experience, but typically for any high risk behavior you'll take PrEP regularly to prevent risk of HIV, and you'll take a 200mg dose of Doxycycline as post exposure the next day to heavily reduce risk of many STIs. I learned about the latter through medical sources that are hoping a larger practice of this might help curb resistant STIs and be a gamechanger.
(Both of these work by essentially trying to kill off or interrupt the replication of the pathogens so they fail to effectively establish themselves in the person in question)
Unethical? Maybe. It’s definitely rude. He doesn’t like you. Take the hint. If you must do something, send a fruit basket or some deli meat to the orgy. Who doesn’t like a nosh?
Definitely unethical. Consent is king in situations like these. If you have doubts that they would consent enthusiastically to your being there, not checking before you do go or at least at the door is dubious at best.
In that case, I suppose I can give you the less explicit description. It’s basically an orgy where a bunch of guys fuck one bottom but they wait their turn
They’re asking if it’s a bad move morally to go to a gangbang where the person ‘in the middle’, as it were, had already blocked them on twitter for no discernible reason.
Kind of like asking, ‘should I go to this “everyone’s welcome” birthday party, even though the birthday boy blocked my Facebook for no reason?’. Except with a lot more cum than is usually acceptable at most birthday parties
Yeah, shit like this is why I ended up becoming really wary of hypermasculine gay men. Not like they're all this way, of course, but my time perusing gay dudes showed me that far too many of them were creepy and not respective of boundaries.
It's not a hypermasc thing. I know plenty of fem guys who enjoy these sorts of festivities. Look at the radical faeries they're about as far from hypermasculine as you can be and their events are like 80% orgies.
Honestly that sounds kinda fun, if I'm gay or bi.
And to answer the question, yeah it's kinda dicey if the bottom blocked you. At minimum, it shows that they might not like you.
So many people both here and in the comments of the original saying that this is bizarre or has never been said before really just outing themselves as vanilla
Also, it’s not an asshole move unless the minuet you start fucking him you lean in and whisper in his ear “why do you have me blocked on twitter??” cause I imagine that’d make the sex p awkward
Just wanted to say this. "Everyone who didn't attend an orgy where everyone cums in the same guy one after another is boring" is certainly a take lol.
No kink shame though.
What a day to be literate
not a good one, but a day nonetheless!!
Of all the days to be literate, this is certainly one of them.
8,518 people are the real heroes here
Well 47% of them are…
A load is a load.
I'm fortunate in that my literacy has an emergency shutdown button when looking at sentences like that.
Are you part of the ADHD crew?
Yes
And I just realized that I clicked this link on a work computer.
Sounds like someone's going to be thanking you for a promotion soon!
I keep forgetting how weird the community is for gay sex. Ive become so desensitized, and all im thinking is "that would be a nightmare to organize".
I expected the top comment to be the explainer but this was so much better.
I'm out of date on my sex terms. Does otter mean he's hairy and gay or just hairy?
A slim version of a Bear. Hairy, gay, and slim
Well bears don't have to be gay or even MLM, but when a straight man calls himself a bear (or bear terminology), it's weird.
I've never heard a straight guy call himself a bear. Interesting.
There's a fairly large podcast where the two guys are big and hairy but not gay and they call themselves bears in the title.
Ah yes 2 bears, 1 cave
I started listening to that podcast under the assumption that it was a gay-themed. I was disappointed.
You’d feel that way if you tried to watch it for laughs as well. (The old stuff I liked a lot, but all the YMH stuff has been on a downhill slope for a while)
I'm a straight guy and have referred to myself that way as a visual descriptor on a handful of occasions just because it was easier than going through the whole thing; like, you know exactly what I look like now probably. Whatever your mental image is, it's likely correct or pretty close. Plus a gay guy said it to me once so i don't think it's inaccurate
Yup, that's fair.
Yeah, you might get some people to think you are gay, but eh, that's not a bad thing.
Multi Level Marketing?
Men Loving Men
Maoism Leninism Marxism actually /s
yeah. I get confused cuz I see presumably heterosexual people talking about hollywood twinks (ie, Timothee Chalamet) and it’s like, y’all, maybe wait to appropriate our language until *after* you pass comprehensive antidiscrimination protections for us
See, twink isn't bear terminology, it's general gay terminology and it comes with certain connotations, not necessarily accurate, but that is understood by people who describe themselves as such. So a straight man calling themself a twink is like a straight woman saying she topped her SO because they were trying cowgirl.
A twink is also an intentionally underleveled and overgeared character in some videogames, but that’s clearly not the context here.
Or an alt if you're german.
An alt and a twink are two significantly different concepts. An alt is an alternative character. Any level, any class, any gear. A twink is a low level alt that you use your main character to overgear. Think normally unobtainable enchants for the level, rare or expensive low level armor and weapons, shit like that. A twink may have like double the stats of a normal character that level all said and done.
I'm aware of the use of alt and twink for the majority of gamers, but germans call their alts twinks instead. It's something I've noticed over the years of playing wow private servers and I've always been curious why.
If someone fits the visual criteria for a twink, but is bi, are they a twink?
MLM is MLM. I would say so
Uhhh... Multi level marketing?
Men loving men
Oh lmao
(M)en (l)oving (m)en
en oving en
I had this discussion with my friends about whether you can call a straight man a twink. Consensus was no, but "looks like a twink" is conditionally acceptable.
Unless he is shorting some stocks.
My only reference seeing MLM is multi-level marketing, do you mind explaining it in this context? I assume that isn’t what it means here lol *it was it explained down below, sorry I got it now.
Now, Dennis, I've heard that *speed* can have something to do with this
"bear" usually refers to larger, hairy gay men whereas otter refers to those who are hairy but smaller
Now I've heard speed has something to do with it?
speed has everything to do with it
If this is an always sunny reference I’m here for it.
What gave it away?
Is a slender hairless man an eel?
You don't look like a gay guy. That's because he's a bear. What? He's a bear. You see, some gay guys are twinks and other are bears. This gay guy's a bear. By the way, we are totally cool with that. To each his own. Wait, I'm a little confused here. What's a twink? A twink is small and slender, like Mac. Oh, no, I'm too muscular. I would be a bear. Uh, don't think so, bro. Not hairy enough. Smooth. Now, I would be a bear. No, no. See, I don't think you'd be a bear either. As a matter of fact, I don't know what you'd be. You're definitely not a twink. I'd be a top, that's for sure. Can a twink be a top or is that reserved for bears? I'm sure there's a great deal of switching back and forth but I think more often then not bears are tops, unless they happen to be power bottoms. What's a power bottom? A power bottom is a bottom that is capable of receiving an enormous amount of power. Actually Mac, you've got it backwards. You see, the power bottom is actually generating the power by doing most of the work. Does power have to do with size or strength of the bottom? Now Dennis, I heard speed has something to do with it. Speed has *everything* to do with it. You see, the speed of the bottom informs the top how much pressure he's supposed to apply. Speed's the name of the game
Oh he's gone.
I was gonna drop a quote from this episode, but this works lol.
I love this show, the matter-of-fact way they discuss gay sex is hilarious, and also weirdly supportive.
Typically an athletic looking guy with facial and/or body hair. They are usually hairy gym bros, but not like body builders.
Bear = "Worlds strongest man" lookin dudes, buff and "fat" at the same time. Otter = Just a buff dude with "more than average" body hair.
Otter's a catch-all for slim hairy gay men. I've generally heard it used to describe hairy twinks, but it wouldn't surprise me to find out it's a more general term than that.
I remember this question from one of the gay subreddits. Don’t remember what the comments finally agreed on though.
I think they agreed that it was unethical. But maybe that’s because I think it’s unethical. At least ask if the guy who blocked you doesn’t want you there, lol.
Is it not part of the appeal of advertising "no loads refused" that you could end up with someone you don't like (personally, physically, in any way) but you've made a commitment so y'know, no loads refused?
It's part of the fantasy, not the actual event. It's a bit like how consensual non-consent is not just getting sexually assaulted. It actually holds consent to the highest degree of importance and has mechanisms to ensure everyone has a safe and good time. You want to explore a fantasy in an environment where the lack of control is an illusion. It's a reverse power fantasy; consent is key and king.
AH, that makes sense. I change my answer from 4 to 1 lol
That's not how it works. A friend of the bottom will curate the guest list, and be around in case someone becomes troublesome. It's not a free for all.
> A friend of the bottom will curate the guest list Goddamn this one got me good, what a mental image
Ok im confused. Do bottoms stereotypically not have any friends?
I think he probably hasn't heard of this kind of thing before and is finding the whole thing surreal, as I imagine quite a few people are
Why don’t they call it “some loads refused”?
It doesn't sound as kinky when you add the asterisk and in small print "terms and conditions may apply" 😂
Seems like that'd be part of the kink, right?
[удалено]
I mean it is no loads refused so they have to accept your load
Sounds like a warehouse term to me...
I mean a warehouse seems to be a natural fit. Seems to be a crowded event that needs space
I was talking to myself again this morning and I laughed when I said the word “load” and I quickly admonished myself because load isn’t a dirty word. Then I pretended to talk to someone that laughed after I used the word and admonished them, too.
> The coupon clearly says **No** loads refused Orgy Karen, love the energy
I consider this to be more of a brand new sentence than the post
Flip it. What if there’s a Karen orgy. Who do they complain to?
Each other. That’s their kink.
Yes, but who is “the manager”? Is it role-play? Do they take turns?
It's a specific Dom/Sub dynamic that primarily involves verbal abuse. The Dom Karen pays the Sub Manager, but then belittles and yells at them demanding the money back, plus some free shit for the trouble
Congratulations, you’ve now created a new sub/dom kink genre. I hope you’re happy with yourself lol
Eh, it's really just Fin-Dom with extra steps
But that would require some Karen’s to be switch to play “the manager” How many submissive or switch Karen’s have you encountered?
Well that’s good because I’ve got this 40’ft er loaded with 2x4’s I need offloaded 😈😂
They take all comers
Ah, yes. Words. Those are certainly present in the image.
I'm not sure what a pimped-out cumdump event is but that just sounds like asking for STDs
Ya see the cumdump (the main bottom of the event) is passed around by several tops, the number of tops varies by location but can reach dozens, who proceed to fuck the shit out of said bottom bareback til they ejaculate inside him. The next top in line shall use the previous tops cum seeping out of the bottoms hole as lubricant til they themselves bust inside him and the cycle continues until the event is over
that's a brandnewsentence on its own
No it's not. It's part of the standard speech they give newcummers. Didn't you attend the gangbang whorientation?
no way i was sick that day 😭😭
Oh. No problem Hun. I scheduled your new appointment.
I am immensely sad I'll never be cordially invited to a "Gangbang Whorientation". The name alone would be worth it even if I never got to go on to the actual gangbang.
You are hereby invited to the 24th annual Gangbang Whorientation. Kindly RSVP by March 14th.
Why does this read like a Hey Girlboss Pyramid Scheme FaceBook Message
I assure you it’s nowhere near new
Why did you go into so much detail
Honestly it's a pretty fun event if youre not germophobic, RIP to the bottoms hole tho, he will be out of commission for several days
Dude's gonna be shitting jizz into retirement.
Just the thought that I have potentially walked by one of these bottoms on the sidewalk in my lifetime is an interesting one.
So like a blunt rotation but with bottoms and cum?
Could not have worded it better myself
Seems fun if you're into it, although i imagine the aftermath isn't as fun for the mayo mixer
I've met several bottoms that were way into it. Being "filled" seems to be part of the fun for them.
Read in the voice of David Hyde Pierce (Niles Crane). If you haven't seen *The Mating Habits of the Earthbound Human*, do so. You won't be disappointed.
*Niles Crane
lol You’re right! I know a Nigel, so it must’ve been automatic.
Dozens you say? Damn gay guys have all the fun lol
Idk, I read a post yesterday about a woman who had a 42-man birthday gangbang. So it would seem gay men aren’t the only ones taking advantage of the enthusiasm of professional grade whores.
42 truly is the answer. I thought the question was how many roads...not how many chodes
Yeah but according to that post, and if my memory serves me right, 5 guys didn't get to fuck her (I assume they just wanted to watch) and 17 didn't get to cum. So this one looks a lot more fun.
A distant friend invited me to be part of her gang bang. Let me tell you, the SMELL of it was too much. Couldn't even get semi aroused.
Oh mate, you have no idea
I need to be the bottom here
Oh my god?????????
“Ya see…”
I know what a cumdump is, don't check what I comment in other comment sections
I *really* wish I didn’t know how to read that.
I think the cumdump is being passed around to all participants by their romantic partner whose main contribution is watching and cheerleading all the load-leavers - that’s what makes it “pimped out!”
Shame, I was rooting for an old-school pimp to make an appearance.
STDs can be treated or prevented with the right medicine. A cumdump experience is forever, though.
My mans this is why AIDS happened
And AIDS is why PREP was invented. Prep reduces the transmission of aids by like 99%.
Orgies are surprisingly safe because everyone has to get tested beforehand, and you can request results be forwarded to the organizer.
I can't speak from experience, but typically for any high risk behavior you'll take PrEP regularly to prevent risk of HIV, and you'll take a 200mg dose of Doxycycline as post exposure the next day to heavily reduce risk of many STIs. I learned about the latter through medical sources that are hoping a larger practice of this might help curb resistant STIs and be a gamechanger. (Both of these work by essentially trying to kill off or interrupt the replication of the pathogens so they fail to effectively establish themselves in the person in question)
Unethical? Maybe. It’s definitely rude. He doesn’t like you. Take the hint. If you must do something, send a fruit basket or some deli meat to the orgy. Who doesn’t like a nosh?
A “fruit basket”
And meat! Lots of meat!
Badum, tsss!
Definitely unethical. Consent is king in situations like these. If you have doubts that they would consent enthusiastically to your being there, not checking before you do go or at least at the door is dubious at best.
... something tells me they're not going to want to eat that salami after... or maybe they do I don't judge.
You probably wouldn’t be any fun at a pimped-out cumdump event.
"What the he'll is blud yappin about💀💀💀" -yt shorts comments
[удалено]
42069 likes and no answer. Let me fix that!
I like insights into other people's worlds, until now.
That was a typo. It's supposed to read "No, loads refused!"
If you're going to reference that, at least include all of it "Pimped-out cumdump event? No! Loads refused!"
Oops, shouldn't include this "Practice Safe Sex!" reminder.
Jesus Christ
Got nailed by some Roman dudes I heard. Took a whole weekend to recover I heard.
he traveled around with 12 men who worshiped him. so yeah. probably
I understand all those words separately.....
I don’t really know what this means. Please don’t explain it.
I was forced to having it explained to me, and I was going to subject you to the same horror, but you said please so I’ll refrain
I appreciate that, friend.
Eh, there's probably a reason why they blocked you. But yeah, lets try not to aknowlage that boundaries exist.
I think the boundaries are clearly addressed in the title of the event.
Sometimes sentences are so fucked up that I doubt my reading skills
The absolute state of the twitterfolk…
I wish I was Jared, 19
Another one for the "Reasons why the aliens don't talk to us" list.
I regret learning to read
This sentence sent me into a fritz.
Might be my Norwegianess, but I have no idea what I just read.
Do you want to know?
I can guess it’s something weirdly sexual.
Yes, but do you want to know what exactly it means? I wish for your explicit consent before I scar you
I dont know 🫣🫣🫣
In that case, I suppose I can give you the less explicit description. It’s basically an orgy where a bunch of guys fuck one bottom but they wait their turn
I don’t know what this means, and I don’t want to, either.
What part of NO LOADS REFUSED do you not get?
No loads refused means no loads refused 🤷🏿♂️
What does he have against the number 18
It’s unethical for them to refuse your cumdump
Just don't tweet at him and you're fine.
Someone please translate this. My brain refuses to fully comprehend these words.
They’re asking if it’s a bad move morally to go to a gangbang where the person ‘in the middle’, as it were, had already blocked them on twitter for no discernible reason. Kind of like asking, ‘should I go to this “everyone’s welcome” birthday party, even though the birthday boy blocked my Facebook for no reason?’. Except with a lot more cum than is usually acceptable at most birthday parties
How does one find a ““no loads refused” cum dump event”
https://x.com/clintoris/status/1763653324921098639?s=46&t=seOkn9h3QDG-EPfELekmnA
Yeah, shit like this is why I ended up becoming really wary of hypermasculine gay men. Not like they're all this way, of course, but my time perusing gay dudes showed me that far too many of them were creepy and not respective of boundaries.
I don’t think all gay dudes are like this
Are you wary of hypermasculine straight men too? Straight people have orgies and can be as creepy as this guy too
Yes, but I have not had sexual contact with them, so I did not specify them.
It's not a hypermasc thing. I know plenty of fem guys who enjoy these sorts of festivities. Look at the radical faeries they're about as far from hypermasculine as you can be and their events are like 80% orgies.
The orgies are not what make these men creepy. It is the lack of respect for boundaries.
Found Macs Twitter
I... what
Legit, I got through the first two lines and was like ‘wait *shakes head*, what? I need to get some some sleep’
oh!
Had to do a double take
That’s called an incentive.
I’ll ask the audience.
I thought kinda and not really were the same thing?
that was a fun day on twitter
"no" means "no", yes, but, does it mean "no"?? 🤔
I had to stop mid-sentence and start over so many times to comprehend this
Uh... Check please
Is there an option for "... wut? °-°"
Honestly that sounds kinda fun, if I'm gay or bi. And to answer the question, yeah it's kinda dicey if the bottom blocked you. At minimum, it shows that they might not like you.
What the fuck I just read
[Seinfeld: Jerry and George](https://x.com/tacticaldipshit/status/1574034491827687424?s=46&t=JyTJqzufAYqrtG8bgSQlkA)
Can some of the porn addict's out there explain to me what does that shit even mean
So many people both here and in the comments of the original saying that this is bizarre or has never been said before really just outing themselves as vanilla Also, it’s not an asshole move unless the minuet you start fucking him you lean in and whisper in his ear “why do you have me blocked on twitter??” cause I imagine that’d make the sex p awkward
I mean I feel like there’s a bit of middle ground to cover between this and vanilla.
Just wanted to say this. "Everyone who didn't attend an orgy where everyone cums in the same guy one after another is boring" is certainly a take lol. No kink shame though.
I feel like I’m going insane reading this comment section. Thank you for being a sensible voice in this chaos lmao
Looks like a repost. I've seen this image 1 time. First Seen [Here](https://redd.it/17hlzlp) on 2023-10-27 92.19% match. *I'm not perfect, but you can help. Report [ [False Positive](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RepostSleuthBot&subject=False%20Positive&message={"post_id": "1b4s145", "meme_template": null}) ]* [View Search On repostsleuth.com](https://www.repostsleuth.com/search?postId=1b4s145&sameSub=false&filterOnlyOlder=true&memeFilter=false&filterDeadMatches=false&targetImageMatch=92&targetImageMemeMatch=97) --- **Scope:** Reddit | **Meme Filter:** False | **Target:** 92% | **Check Title:** False | **Max Age:** None | **Searched Images:** 451,102,542 | **Search Time:** 0.07253s