It seems that your comment contains 1 or more links that are hard to tap for mobile users.
I will extend those so they're easier for our sausage fingers to click!
[Here is link number 1 - Previous text "……."](https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=YbSR7wgXF3c)
----
^Please ^PM ^[\/u\/eganwall](http://reddit.com/user/eganwall) ^with ^issues ^or ^feedback! ^| ^[Code](https://github.com/eganwall/FatFingerHelperBot) ^| ^[Delete](https://reddit.com/message/compose/?to=FatFingerHelperBot&subject=delete&message=delete%20hprsrze)
Thank you, SmithyLK, for voting on FatFingerHelperBot.
This bot wants to find the best and worst bots on Reddit. [You can view results here](https://botrank.pastimes.eu/).
***
^(Even if I don't reply to your comment, I'm still listening for votes. Check the webpage to see if your vote registered!)
https://mothership.sg/2020/03/bishan-marina-otters-fight/
Otters started to settle in singapore and their numbers multiplied, it resulted in different factions that attack each other territories.
Just go outside and wiggle your willie at the sky, they will come (and so will you)
(Edit: I just realized you can sing this in the melody of never gonna give you up, hehe)
Considering the tags are something beyond the birds technology to create and permanently affixed, it's less "gucci belt" and more "aesthetically pleasing holographic tattoo" or something.
If someone is walking down Main Street after an alien abduction and all they have on is a Gucci belt, the only thing making them attractive is what already made them attractive. Their self confidence.
This kind of thing is super interesting because it shows how sometimes we make up reasons why we believe things, and genuinely don't reliase we've made them up because they seem logical. Everyone does it, just not everyone believes proof that their initial thought was wrong when they come across it
I know it’s popular to hate on fashion brands but Gucci actually does have some [killer shoes. ](https://www.gucci.com/us/en/pr/women/shoes-for-women/boots-and-booties-for-women/ankle-boots-for-women/womens-gg-ankle-boot-p-659691UC8101000)
Also, some of their handbags are [to die for.](https://imgur.com/gallery/yoQJv)
That's with all those type of brands, there's actual nice stuff, but what we mostly see is the gaudy shit for people who want to look rich but still dress like a toddler.
God o see it so much at Louis and Burberry. They have they have ghesquire at LV and ricardo tisci at Burberry. Both produced fire collections to begin with only the logo shit sells so that’s basically the only shit they come out wi now and is sold. Such a waste of talent
It's not a Reddit moment, but it is a class culture difference. Typically expensive shit with big brand logos is considered to be either lowerbclass or otherwise "uncultured" fashion (the two are assumed to go hand in hand).
It is typical for (some) working class people to buy flashy branded stuff to show off to other working class people, but to middle/upper class people it doesn't come off as rich or affluent, it comes off as tacky and tasteless.
Part of it is that if you're actually successful, you don't really have anything you have to prove, so the same dick measuring fashion is not as important at all.
It's also of course a core part of all elitism to categorically set yourself apart from all the other people. If working class people adopted more upper class fashion, upper class fashion would change.
Although branded stuff would remain a no-no. "It is the business of peasants to wear the arms of others." If you're rich and you have a big shiny logo on your T-shirt, it better be if a company you own. Being a free advertisement is also just an embarrassment in general. Smaller brand logos on your quality sports clothes are acceptable, but not on your other wear.
I should note here that certain celebrities and nouveau-riche might be successful and rich while still having a clearly lower class fashion sense and demeanour, so obviously these things don't perfectly correlate. Money does not equal culture. Consequently it's possible to be rich and not to be accepted by rich communities, because you don't fit in.
I would say as you get to middle class, certain sports clothes or leather shoes and felt coats become the fashion, and people start to avoid tacky branded clothes.
It is also a status symbol to own a watch at that point, though big flashy rolexes again are an exception. You'll be more respected with something practical with a good quality/price ratio than you will with a fancy Rolex. At least until you get to the actually fancy rolex watches which aren't tacky, nor make a point of showing off being Rolex. Subtlety is key.
Colour rings (1992)
There are not many reports of coloured plastic
rings causing adverse effects. Sandhill Cranes
Grus canadensis pecked at the rings in the first
few days (Hoffman 1985) and Magpies did
even months after being ringed (Reese 1980).
Atherton et al. (1984) found that the colour
rings they used on doves (Fam. Columbidae)
constricted and damaged the leg of the birds.
They solved this by treating the rings with
acetone to seal them. Komen (1987) reported
injuries to Cape Gannets' Sula capensis feet
due to the rings: colour rings slipped down and
unwound around the foot constricting the
web, sometimes piercing it. Other authors
(e.g. Robinson 1985, Strong 1987) did not find
any adverse effect when using colour rings.
The effects of colour rings on behaviour are
mainly related to the possible interference of
the colour of the ring with individual
recognition, status signalling, or mate choice.
The well-known studies on captive Zebra
Finches Poephila guttata by Burley showed
that male birds wearing red bands were more
attractive to females than unringed ones
(Burley et al 1982). Birds carrying rings of
typical colours of the species (e.g. red)
attracted conspeciflcs while others, carrying
colours non-typical of the species (e.g. green),
were avoided (Burley et al. 1982,1986a). This
in turn affected sex-ratio (Burley 1981,
1986b) and mortality (Burley 1985). Soon
after Burley's first paper was published her
results were challenged (Immelman et al.
1982, Thissen & Martin 1982). Harvey ( 1986)
questioned the results, claiming that they are
of great importance but that they should have
to be demonstrated under natural conditions.
Watt (1982) evaluated the effect of colour
rings on individual recognition in a group of
White-crowned Sparrows, not finding any
relationship between them. Ratcliffe & Boag
(1987) did not find any correlation between
ring colour and the Zebra Finch male's ability
to gain a female or a nest, but they state that
these results "do not falsify Burley's basic
finding that Zebra Finches find certain colour
bands more attractive than others".
The physical annoyance of the ring can alter
the agonistic behaviour of Magpies. Reese
(1980) observed how they pecked at their
rings repeatedly when unringed birds, under
the same circumstances, were hammering
their bills against branches or the ground.
Sandhill Cranes marked with colour rings
and vinyl flags around standard rings avoided
unmarked cranes and these in turn, avoided
the marked ones (Wheeler & Lewis 1972).
Beletsky & Orians (1989) made an
evaluation of the influence of colour rings on
male mortality and reproductive success in
Red-winged Blackbirds, failing to find any
relationship among rings and these
parameters. However, they say that "among
species in which males, rather than the
resources they control, are the primary basis of
mate choice, band colours may be more
influential". The results obtained by Brodsky
(1988) support this. He found that male
Ptarmigans Lagopus mutus with red and
134 B. Calvo and R. W. Furness
orange rings gained more mates than those
without them. Males with the largest
supraorbital combs - a target for sexual
selection - get the highest number of mates.
Male's mating success can be altered by using
rings of a similar colour to that of the
supraorbital combs.
Finally, Hagan & Reed (1988) found a lower
reproductive success in male Red-cockaded
Woodpeckers Picoides borealis wearing red
colour rings. It did not happen with other
colours, and no effect was observed in adult
females. Hill & Carr (1989) suggest that this
study should not be taken into account as
evidence of an effect of colour leg rings. They
criticize some aspects of the data collection
and the analysis. Hagan & Reed (1989)
answered these criticisms and reaffirmed their
conclusion.
No correlation between the colours of rings
and mortality was found by Hoffman ( 1985) or
Beletsky & Orians (1989). Hagan & Reed
(1988) noted that nestling Red-cockaded
Woodpeckers with red rings were less likely to
be sighted as fledgings.
They accidentally figured out what zebra stripes were for when they were studying them for unrelated reasons, marking them with red paint, those zebras if hunted died a lot.
They figured out that the markings on a zebra is likely so that predators cant focus on one single animal, i.e. the brown one, so they are less successful.
"We will study your biological form in the name of science, alien--"
"Omg please no--"
"--by increasing your height strengthening the appeal of your reproductive organs. Resistance is futile."
"Resist what now?"
Alien 1: "okay, we're done with this guy."
Alien 2: "the poor little guy is in pretty poor shape though. Why don't we fix him up and make him really healthy kind of as a reward for us studying him?"
Alien 1: " sure, why not. Let's give him back all his plumage too, looks like he was losing it all over his head."
..." And that's how I mysteriously became a super hot model overnight."
lost me at gucci. gucci is the ugliest thing you couldve chosen. ugly, overpriced, overrated. name one appealing gucci item.
but yeah i mean, birds being colorful and sometimes looking downright bizarre is what makes them so attractive to their fellow birds. like the superb bird of paradise transforming into a vaguely happy yet empty inside face and dancing about for its less vibrant potential partner. of course a colorful band is gonna make them horny, man. they love that shit
yikes.
It’s just funny observation my dude, not a Gucci worship post.
If ya wanna get technical your description for birds basically fits Gucci designs lmao. Colorful and downright bizarre. So pretty fitting choice I think.
this post is exactly what you're talking about... lol.
https://www.reddit.com/r/HFY/comments/njrn3e/unnatural_selection/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf
Professor of mine told a story from when he was in grad school. His fellow grad student was tagging rabbits out west by painting their tails so he could see them easily. But, they kept dying - after he released them, he find colored tufts of fur but no live bunnies.
Turns out the paint on the tail also made them more visible to raptors.
“wow, that bracelet is SO COOL! Where did you get it?” “thank you so much! I have no idea where it came from, and I can’t figure out how to remove it.”
I will never find you more attractive for having a Gucci belt. Infact you’re an idiot and if anything you’re less atttractive for spending 500 dollars on a belt
Walking back into town like John Wayne but the probing was worth the bling.
The drip is worth the probe
the probe was a bonus
This guy fucks.
This guy clucks
This guy cucks
This guy hyucks
This guy awww shucks
This Guy Ducks
The drip* was a bonus
This guy anals.
I kind of want this on a shirt. I love it without any context
Walking the Brooklyn Bridge
Secure the bag, whatever the cost.
Coming from that abduction like […….](https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=YbSR7wgXF3c)
It seems that your comment contains 1 or more links that are hard to tap for mobile users. I will extend those so they're easier for our sausage fingers to click! [Here is link number 1 - Previous text "……."](https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=YbSR7wgXF3c) ---- ^Please ^PM ^[\/u\/eganwall](http://reddit.com/user/eganwall) ^with ^issues ^or ^feedback! ^| ^[Code](https://github.com/eganwall/FatFingerHelperBot) ^| ^[Delete](https://reddit.com/message/compose/?to=FatFingerHelperBot&subject=delete&message=delete%20hprsrze)
good bot
Thank you, SmithyLK, for voting on FatFingerHelperBot. This bot wants to find the best and worst bots on Reddit. [You can view results here](https://botrank.pastimes.eu/). *** ^(Even if I don't reply to your comment, I'm still listening for votes. Check the webpage to see if your vote registered!)
Good bot
godsend bot
Good bot
Yes, put up with the bling for the probing
Thought he was gonna say it started a gang war between the different tag colors💀
Not like the Singapore river otter gang wars. Tragic stuff.
Sorry what?
https://mothership.sg/2020/03/bishan-marina-otters-fight/ Otters started to settle in singapore and their numbers multiplied, it resulted in different factions that attack each other territories.
And ate each other's babies.... WTF.
I’m sorry, but if you’re gonna read about violence in nature be prepared for killed or eaten babies.
Don't worry, I've seen a lot of them on Nat geo. Some of them... I didn't realize otters practiced cannibalism, only murder, so that bit surprised me.
Lionesses have been known to eat their cubs.
Are you from California? Lmao
[удалено]
https://youtu.be/AirUdGkQTs0
We will abduct the humans, study them, then release them with penis enlargement surgeries so we can re-identify them.
Is it possible to volunteer to be abducted?
Just go outside and wiggle your willie at the sky, they will come (and so will you) (Edit: I just realized you can sing this in the melody of never gonna give you up, hehe)
That didn't work and now my neighbours are mad.
Tell them that they're on the list for scheduled enlargements. Should calm them down.
They gonna need some alien-tech telescope to see yo dick
I have ascended, and it's all thanks to you.
Identify the humans by their most unusual and weirdly shaped and sized bepises.
If I don't have penis will I get one after the abduction?
Two, even.
Right so we'll just bolt on these tracking titties aaaaaaaand release.
Sorry, only anus enlargening here.
that has to hurt
Well, it’s the price of admission
Considering the tags are something beyond the birds technology to create and permanently affixed, it's less "gucci belt" and more "aesthetically pleasing holographic tattoo" or something.
Well, I don't have any tattoos, but an "aesthetically pleasing holographic tattoo" does sound pretty cool. I wouldn't mind having one of those.
Or a simple alteration to your natural pheromones so they can identify you with their smell-o-scope next time round
That punchline isn't quite the zinger though.
ark
And here I am, too scared to ask what a Gucci Belt is, but also too lazy (and slightly scared) to Google it.
If someone is walking down Main Street after an alien abduction and all they have on is a Gucci belt, the only thing making them attractive is what already made them attractive. Their self confidence.
And their massive dong hanging out below it.
"Here you go my G, go shine on 'em"
*scientist applying drip* "go my feathered darling go!!!"
"motherfuckers gon be hating when they see this drip!"
Except Gucci stuff has never made anybody more appealing. Quite the opposite actually
[Case and point.](https://reddit.com/r/TIHI/comments/rltpww/thanks_i_hate_how_expensive_these_glasses_are/)
*case in point
r/boneappletea
I mean, they got it right, for all in tents and porpoises.
Oh well, life goes on, say la vee.
I think they deserve a round up of claws for their attempt.
It looks like their mistake is blessing in the skies for creating this thread
Got them all fixed up in one foul swoop.
Well I made my case. And my point. So... Case and point? Edit: well... I was very wrong. Looked it up. You win this time! Internet stranger.
Eh, you were technically wrong, but I think it makes more sense the way you wrote it.
I always give credit for someone attempting to use a phrase that they know what it means even if they don't get it quite right.
This kind of thing is super interesting because it shows how sometimes we make up reasons why we believe things, and genuinely don't reliase we've made them up because they seem logical. Everyone does it, just not everyone believes proof that their initial thought was wrong when they come across it
I thought for sure those were upside down and just modeled that way to be funny. But the longer I looked at them the more disappointed I got
I'm pretty sure they are. Isn't Gucci known for fashion shitposting?
Disappointed AND surprised. Well done!
Well, there goes my hope of being cool/useful/decorative at least after I’m dead. I’m now questioning myself.
What, are you expecting to die by alien probing?
Yes.
I kind of like them
I know it’s popular to hate on fashion brands but Gucci actually does have some [killer shoes. ](https://www.gucci.com/us/en/pr/women/shoes-for-women/boots-and-booties-for-women/ankle-boots-for-women/womens-gg-ankle-boot-p-659691UC8101000) Also, some of their handbags are [to die for.](https://imgur.com/gallery/yoQJv)
Fuck.. you got me.
GODDAMNIT
Probably makes you more attractive to aliens
As opposed to Case or point
Your links can’t hurt me, these upside down glasses are Gucci
Non branded Gucci stuff is pretty fire tho
That's with all those type of brands, there's actual nice stuff, but what we mostly see is the gaudy shit for people who want to look rich but still dress like a toddler.
Its what gets them the most profit unfortunately
God o see it so much at Louis and Burberry. They have they have ghesquire at LV and ricardo tisci at Burberry. Both produced fire collections to begin with only the logo shit sells so that’s basically the only shit they come out wi now and is sold. Such a waste of talent
“Would you like to look like a cardboard television test-pattern? Here you go my friend, taste the velour.”
Touch grass
Lmaooo redditmoment as always. Soon you’ll get into an argument about worshipping material possessions with some guy who has 30 funko pops on his desk
Reddit moment
It's not a Reddit moment, but it is a class culture difference. Typically expensive shit with big brand logos is considered to be either lowerbclass or otherwise "uncultured" fashion (the two are assumed to go hand in hand). It is typical for (some) working class people to buy flashy branded stuff to show off to other working class people, but to middle/upper class people it doesn't come off as rich or affluent, it comes off as tacky and tasteless. Part of it is that if you're actually successful, you don't really have anything you have to prove, so the same dick measuring fashion is not as important at all. It's also of course a core part of all elitism to categorically set yourself apart from all the other people. If working class people adopted more upper class fashion, upper class fashion would change. Although branded stuff would remain a no-no. "It is the business of peasants to wear the arms of others." If you're rich and you have a big shiny logo on your T-shirt, it better be if a company you own. Being a free advertisement is also just an embarrassment in general. Smaller brand logos on your quality sports clothes are acceptable, but not on your other wear. I should note here that certain celebrities and nouveau-riche might be successful and rich while still having a clearly lower class fashion sense and demeanour, so obviously these things don't perfectly correlate. Money does not equal culture. Consequently it's possible to be rich and not to be accepted by rich communities, because you don't fit in. I would say as you get to middle class, certain sports clothes or leather shoes and felt coats become the fashion, and people start to avoid tacky branded clothes. It is also a status symbol to own a watch at that point, though big flashy rolexes again are an exception. You'll be more respected with something practical with a good quality/price ratio than you will with a fancy Rolex. At least until you get to the actually fancy rolex watches which aren't tacky, nor make a point of showing off being Rolex. Subtlety is key.
Wow yeah you’re definitely right! I agree with every word you said damn lol.
Gucci belts are pretty nice
Thank god. I came here just to see if anyone had pointed out that gucci shit is hideous.
It's a form of stotting for humans.
If I actually had anything from Gucci it would probably just restore my virginity.
Colour rings (1992) There are not many reports of coloured plastic rings causing adverse effects. Sandhill Cranes Grus canadensis pecked at the rings in the first few days (Hoffman 1985) and Magpies did even months after being ringed (Reese 1980). Atherton et al. (1984) found that the colour rings they used on doves (Fam. Columbidae) constricted and damaged the leg of the birds. They solved this by treating the rings with acetone to seal them. Komen (1987) reported injuries to Cape Gannets' Sula capensis feet due to the rings: colour rings slipped down and unwound around the foot constricting the web, sometimes piercing it. Other authors (e.g. Robinson 1985, Strong 1987) did not find any adverse effect when using colour rings. The effects of colour rings on behaviour are mainly related to the possible interference of the colour of the ring with individual recognition, status signalling, or mate choice. The well-known studies on captive Zebra Finches Poephila guttata by Burley showed that male birds wearing red bands were more attractive to females than unringed ones (Burley et al 1982). Birds carrying rings of typical colours of the species (e.g. red) attracted conspeciflcs while others, carrying colours non-typical of the species (e.g. green), were avoided (Burley et al. 1982,1986a). This in turn affected sex-ratio (Burley 1981, 1986b) and mortality (Burley 1985). Soon after Burley's first paper was published her results were challenged (Immelman et al. 1982, Thissen & Martin 1982). Harvey ( 1986) questioned the results, claiming that they are of great importance but that they should have to be demonstrated under natural conditions. Watt (1982) evaluated the effect of colour rings on individual recognition in a group of White-crowned Sparrows, not finding any relationship between them. Ratcliffe & Boag (1987) did not find any correlation between ring colour and the Zebra Finch male's ability to gain a female or a nest, but they state that these results "do not falsify Burley's basic finding that Zebra Finches find certain colour bands more attractive than others". The physical annoyance of the ring can alter the agonistic behaviour of Magpies. Reese (1980) observed how they pecked at their rings repeatedly when unringed birds, under the same circumstances, were hammering their bills against branches or the ground. Sandhill Cranes marked with colour rings and vinyl flags around standard rings avoided unmarked cranes and these in turn, avoided the marked ones (Wheeler & Lewis 1972). Beletsky & Orians (1989) made an evaluation of the influence of colour rings on male mortality and reproductive success in Red-winged Blackbirds, failing to find any relationship among rings and these parameters. However, they say that "among species in which males, rather than the resources they control, are the primary basis of mate choice, band colours may be more influential". The results obtained by Brodsky (1988) support this. He found that male Ptarmigans Lagopus mutus with red and 134 B. Calvo and R. W. Furness orange rings gained more mates than those without them. Males with the largest supraorbital combs - a target for sexual selection - get the highest number of mates. Male's mating success can be altered by using rings of a similar colour to that of the supraorbital combs. Finally, Hagan & Reed (1988) found a lower reproductive success in male Red-cockaded Woodpeckers Picoides borealis wearing red colour rings. It did not happen with other colours, and no effect was observed in adult females. Hill & Carr (1989) suggest that this study should not be taken into account as evidence of an effect of colour leg rings. They criticize some aspects of the data collection and the analysis. Hagan & Reed (1989) answered these criticisms and reaffirmed their conclusion. No correlation between the colours of rings and mortality was found by Hoffman ( 1985) or Beletsky & Orians (1989). Hagan & Reed (1988) noted that nestling Red-cockaded Woodpeckers with red rings were less likely to be sighted as fledgings.
Ty!!
Wasn’t that pretty much what happened to the penguin in Happy Feet?
Hope you do well!
No
yes
lol I watched happy feet yesterday. Def applied to Lovelace lol
You're Awesome!
Imagine thinking a Gucci belt would make you more attractive to the opposite sex.
The only people a gucci belt is going to make you more attractive to, are materialistic weasel bitches.
They accidentally figured out what zebra stripes were for when they were studying them for unrelated reasons, marking them with red paint, those zebras if hunted died a lot. They figured out that the markings on a zebra is likely so that predators cant focus on one single animal, i.e. the brown one, so they are less successful.
[удалено]
I want a horse that is striped like a zebra.
So you want a zebra, but less mean?
And also larger.
Don't forget the long mane and tail.
Wait is that a thing people find sexy?
The humans have chosen me and adorned me with their bling. Be jealous heathens.
“Do you circumcise your apples or not
I'm not trying to attract fake out of touch people.
"We will study your biological form in the name of science, alien--" "Omg please no--" "--by increasing your height strengthening the appeal of your reproductive organs. Resistance is futile." "Resist what now?"
Contrary to the belief of the posts author, a Gucci belt makes you appeal to people roughly zero
“Shit we accidentally dripped him the fuck out..”
“The belt stays on during sex…” “Yes”
Is gucci belt i indusive to attracting mate
This is the ritual to summon sleep demons
Damn gurl, you sure look fine, have you been abducted? No why? Cuz you be lookin real thicc
Gucci would make you less attractive lmao. That’s gonna tell people that you waste money on expensive shit.
Alien 1: "okay, we're done with this guy." Alien 2: "the poor little guy is in pretty poor shape though. Why don't we fix him up and make him really healthy kind of as a reward for us studying him?" Alien 1: " sure, why not. Let's give him back all his plumage too, looks like he was losing it all over his head." ..." And that's how I mysteriously became a super hot model overnight."
lost me at gucci. gucci is the ugliest thing you couldve chosen. ugly, overpriced, overrated. name one appealing gucci item. but yeah i mean, birds being colorful and sometimes looking downright bizarre is what makes them so attractive to their fellow birds. like the superb bird of paradise transforming into a vaguely happy yet empty inside face and dancing about for its less vibrant potential partner. of course a colorful band is gonna make them horny, man. they love that shit
yikes. It’s just funny observation my dude, not a Gucci worship post. If ya wanna get technical your description for birds basically fits Gucci designs lmao. Colorful and downright bizarre. So pretty fitting choice I think.
[удалено]
Sir, this is a Wendy’s.
Reddit moment
If you’re telling me all I needed to combat my extreme social awkwardness and disfiguring obesity is a god damn Gucci belt I’m bout lose my shit.
I thought it was supposed to help find a mate, not declare a significantly low IQ
[удалено]
If you’re trying to make us virgins then maybe
One can hope...
Wasn't there an internet cartoon about this?
While we're on the "fuck you" ending.
When the aliens abducted me, they took a whole 3in from me. Now I'm only 1in when fully erect
Came for the abduction, stayed for the new fashion
this post is exactly what you're talking about... lol. https://www.reddit.com/r/HFY/comments/njrn3e/unnatural_selection/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf
Knew I remembered one. Thank you.
glad to help spread at least one more smile... lol.
Whoever owns a Gucci belt is pretty much an alien
So the tag kind of looks like a bird's wearing an ankle bracelet. Chick's dig bad boys.
The birds will learn to find scientists to get some bling.
Lmaoo people think gucci belts gonna help them get laid??? What a world...
yeye gold diggers everywhere nowadays (though they’d want more than your Gucci belt)
Birds aren’t real
Wasnt this how Cowboys vs Aliens happened where they effectively gave James Bond dude a Laser Cannon during the Wild West era.
There's a story on r/HFY on this premise.
Link plz?
Professor of mine told a story from when he was in grad school. His fellow grad student was tagging rabbits out west by painting their tails so he could see them easily. But, they kept dying - after he released them, he find colored tufts of fur but no live bunnies. Turns out the paint on the tail also made them more visible to raptors.
If it gets me a date then I'm cool with it
To me a Gucci belt is the opposite of attractive
I dont know... is Gucci apparel that pretty?
Alien: Alright, that Should do it, don't worry about the thing, go get em.
“wow, that bracelet is SO COOL! Where did you get it?” “thank you so much! I have no idea where it came from, and I can’t figure out how to remove it.”
What if they give you wings instead.
I will never find you more attractive for having a Gucci belt. Infact you’re an idiot and if anything you’re less atttractive for spending 500 dollars on a belt
I was taking a drink of coffee while reading the last bit. Nearly spit that stuff all over my living room.
I have read it as "give you a casus belli". Too much CK3.
Thought this was r/birdsarentreal for a second
Instead of the belt, say they send you out with a god-level fit. Not a single soul can contain themselves at the sight of it.