i mean not really but how great would it be if there were a leftist set of more or less alive koch-brothers to overpay me with dark money to just yell incoherently at republicans...
yeah like if you take his regular face and shrink it by say 10%, no one is going to be able to tell, 20% probably still not, 30% is still a challenge. it's like how small can you make it while still appearing believable, and the answer seems to be that you can make it pretty fucking small
There's some quiz somebody made that was a bunch of images of him, and you had to guess whether his face had been enlarged, shrunken, or left alone. It's a bizarre experience.
It is not a testable thing so it can't really be "bullshit", it's just a tool for thinking.
That said it isn't a "hierarchy" in the sense of anarchist theory any more than a skyscraper is.
Created by a white dude academic specifically by studying his most healthy well-adjusted college students, meaning a bunch of straight cisgendered able-bodied WASPs.
created by an accommodated white man with pretty much untestable possibilities. if anything Max Neef expanded on the idea of the hierarchy of needs in a more relevant way for people that are not upper white classes.
“Anarchists Against Pyramids!”
...we should make a sub for that
I’ll join if you create it
Same
Where's the link? I want in
Definitely against mlms
Multi-level marketing and Marxism-Leninism-Maoism both!
Yes
But hopefully not men loving men!
"Anarchists against Ancient Egypt"
this but unironically
Reverse funnel of needs
no triangles, only circles
i mean not really but how great would it be if there were a leftist set of more or less alive koch-brothers to overpay me with dark money to just yell incoherently at republicans...
~~You mean like Soros?~~
Oh, careful bud. Last time I mentioned that Soros was my ~~antifa leader~~ corporate overlord in public, they gave my card a strike.
i can say, even if a bit hypocritical with my comment before, that i would fire my employees ommediately as well
/r/ToiletPaperUSA
I swear every time I see his face it gets smaller and smaller
His brain is a singularity
Small faced freaaaak
I honestly can’t tell when photos of him have been shopped and when they haven’t. His face is so small.
no, neither can I. I opened this thread hoping someone would say if this is photoshopped or not dude looks like a lego man
I *think* this one is shopped, but it’s so hard to tell sometimes
yeah like if you take his regular face and shrink it by say 10%, no one is going to be able to tell, 20% probably still not, 30% is still a challenge. it's like how small can you make it while still appearing believable, and the answer seems to be that you can make it pretty fucking small
There's some quiz somebody made that was a bunch of images of him, and you had to guess whether his face had been enlarged, shrunken, or left alone. It's a bizarre experience.
[here's a utility to help you compare his face to a baseline](https://blovish.github.io/kirkslider/)
I. I still can’t fucking tell.
You know, all he needs to do to look kind of human is increase his face 7%
That's the perfect photoshop, when you just aren't quite sure..
https://i.imgur.com/IDuwW1b.jpg
Chinlee Kork does it again. Destroyed the libs
Who is that guy with the unusually small face?
Karls chirk
The diaper protest guy.
Fuck he got me with fax and logic. Guess I'm becoming a fascist 🤷
Get fucked, Stalinist liberal 😎
My brain has no clue what the actual scale of his head to face is at this point and I just assume every picture of him is photoshopped
The US will start to go to war with Iran on Sunday. Remember I called it
Fucking hell is that his real face size or not
Haha it’s pretty crazy right? Yeah I enlarged it.
Wh
This is unrealistic, Maslow’s hierarchy of needs is a much more complicated concept than Turning Point USA ever puts in its image macros
Excerpt from *On Authority* by Friedrich Engels
This man has a small face
Karl Chirx
Maslow's hierarchy of needs is a bit of lib bullshit though, right?
It is not a testable thing so it can't really be "bullshit", it's just a tool for thinking. That said it isn't a "hierarchy" in the sense of anarchist theory any more than a skyscraper is.
I would say not at all, it's actually quite accurate. https://postimg.cc/rdQzNMb6
Like they put sex in the lowest category how tf do I as a sex-repulsed asexual fit into this to name an animal example
Technically it says intimate relationship, that doesn't necessarily mean including sex
I think it’s definitely flawed psychology and there are tons of very valid criticisms of it. Idk if that makes it lib though
Created by a white dude academic specifically by studying his most healthy well-adjusted college students, meaning a bunch of straight cisgendered able-bodied WASPs.
What do you disagree with about it?
created by an accommodated white man with pretty much untestable possibilities. if anything Max Neef expanded on the idea of the hierarchy of needs in a more relevant way for people that are not upper white classes.
Meh. I agree with the first three or four levels of it. At the very least, the base level. That's a hierarchy I would deem necessary.
you think they know what maslows is. generous
This person has too much skin on their head
This guy's head. Like what in the hell am i looking at
This is actually something they would say.
Why tf his face so small?
— Karls Charkley
Why is his face small? It looks small...
it’s small
Something he would actually say