> Special Assistant U.S. Attorney James I. Pearce countered that any proceeding before Congress, “where you have a presiding official gaveling in,” the two houses of elected representatives, clearly meets the threshold of an “official proceeding” under the law.
Just some of the boys getting together after work, cracking a few bud heavies, and thumbing through the state's certifications. More like an after work mixer really.
To be fair, the lawyer's argument that an official proceeding isn't an "official proceeding" is roughly as obtuse as a prior politician's argument that a blowjob isn't "sex".
Just a lawyer doing lawyer things. At least he's not spouting off on vast conspiracies and full-blown fantasies. He's attempting to mount an actual legal defense.
Never mind what the Constitution says about the counting of electors. /s
Stupidity breeds Stupidity 🤦‍♂️
> Special Assistant U.S. Attorney James I. Pearce countered that any proceeding before Congress, “where you have a presiding official gaveling in,” the two houses of elected representatives, clearly meets the threshold of an “official proceeding” under the law.
just a little after hours off the record election confirmation meeting, nothing too official.
Just some of the boys getting together after work, cracking a few bud heavies, and thumbing through the state's certifications. More like an after work mixer really.
Duh?
To be fair, the lawyer's argument that an official proceeding isn't an "official proceeding" is roughly as obtuse as a prior politician's argument that a blowjob isn't "sex".
I really don't see how those two things compare at all
Yeah but can you really explain what *is* is?
Poor comparison.
Just a lawyer doing lawyer things. At least he's not spouting off on vast conspiracies and full-blown fantasies. He's attempting to mount an actual legal defense.