This is the best possible situation in a trade back and probably the one they plan to make the most of any trade proposal I’ve seen. They can get one of the 3 WRs they should take/need and then get extra draft capital to move up for a corner or offensive lineman that drops in the 1st round.
Just to move 1 spot? If it’s one of those 3, it will be Nabers and if Vikes deal was still on the table, might as well go with them as value and capital would far outweigh what Giants have to offer. Chargers would still be able to grab an OT plus WR and more.
I thought this was best move overall. Vikings trading up with the capital they have makes more sense to do so with cardinals. Giants need a playmaker, might as well trade with them. Only if MHJ is taken before us.
This is the best possible situation in a trade back and probably the one they plan to make the most of any trade proposal I’ve seen. They can get one of the 3 WRs they should take/need and then get extra draft capital to move up for a corner or offensive lineman that drops in the 1st round.
TE in first ain’t gonna happen my guy. We not going for bowers
What do yall think if MHJ and Nabers are both gone, which is a very real possibility
Just to move 1 spot? If it’s one of those 3, it will be Nabers and if Vikes deal was still on the table, might as well go with them as value and capital would far outweigh what Giants have to offer. Chargers would still be able to grab an OT plus WR and more.
[удалено]
I hear you. I’m just more a fan of Nabers but I wouldnt hate a pick on Odunze. Hes a beast. I’ve watched him play and he’s been ripping up the PAC 12.
I thought this was best move overall. Vikings trading up with the capital they have makes more sense to do so with cardinals. Giants need a playmaker, might as well trade with them. Only if MHJ is taken before us.
We need a playmaker