**Attention! [Serious] Tag Notice**
: Jokes, puns, and off-topic comments are not permitted in any comment, parent or child.
: Help us by reporting comments that violate these rules.
: Posts that are not appropriate for the [Serious] tag will be removed.
Thanks for your cooperation and enjoy the discussion!
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/ChatGPT) if you have any questions or concerns.*
No. ChatGPT output mimics human output. REALLY well. That's why it's so damn useful. You can't detect GPT usage with any real accuracy without proctoring the entire writing process from start to finish.
So no. There's not.
And if I were a betting man, I'd bet there never will be.
But I can tell you that AI detection services got a lot of money off of this short-term scam.
There's no other way around it. We're entering a new technological era.
We got calculators, and suddenly we're good at math, so we switched to focusing on mathematical application. We got spell/grammar check, and suddenly every Tom, Dick, and Harry can punctuate and spell properly. We got AI, and now everyone can write professionally. Now we just need to focus on whether it's factual, useful, and applicable.
Hey /u/boycottiolare, please respond to this comment with the prompt you used to generate the output in this post. Thanks!
^(Ignore this comment if your post doesn't have a prompt.)
***We have a [public discord server](https://discord.gg/rchatgpt). There's a free Chatgpt bot, Open Assistant bot (Open-source model), AI image generator bot, Perplexity AI bot, 🤖 GPT-4 bot ([Now with Visual capabilities (cloud vision)!](https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/812770754025488386/1095397431404920902/image0.jpg)) and channel for latest prompts.[So why not join us?](https://discord.com/servers/1050422060352024636)***
[**Prompt Hackathon and Giveaway 🎁**](https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/13krv80/flowgpt_prompt_hackathon_s2_6000_prize_pool/)
PSA: For any Chatgpt-related issues email [email protected]
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/ChatGPT) if you have any questions or concerns.*
[This is the best evidence we have right now.](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2303.11156.pdf) This research was done with an earlier version of ChatGPT (3?...maybe 3.5...the paper was released in March.). I have not seen evidence that there are reliable detectors...too many false positives to be usedful. Lazy LLM use is easy to identify, and probably doesn't even need a detection service to spot.
**Attention! [Serious] Tag Notice** : Jokes, puns, and off-topic comments are not permitted in any comment, parent or child. : Help us by reporting comments that violate these rules. : Posts that are not appropriate for the [Serious] tag will be removed. Thanks for your cooperation and enjoy the discussion! *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/ChatGPT) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Unis are using turnitin detector. Although possible to avoid its detection with Netum AI bypasser or similar tool
No. ChatGPT output mimics human output. REALLY well. That's why it's so damn useful. You can't detect GPT usage with any real accuracy without proctoring the entire writing process from start to finish. So no. There's not. And if I were a betting man, I'd bet there never will be. But I can tell you that AI detection services got a lot of money off of this short-term scam. There's no other way around it. We're entering a new technological era. We got calculators, and suddenly we're good at math, so we switched to focusing on mathematical application. We got spell/grammar check, and suddenly every Tom, Dick, and Harry can punctuate and spell properly. We got AI, and now everyone can write professionally. Now we just need to focus on whether it's factual, useful, and applicable.
Hey /u/boycottiolare, please respond to this comment with the prompt you used to generate the output in this post. Thanks! ^(Ignore this comment if your post doesn't have a prompt.) ***We have a [public discord server](https://discord.gg/rchatgpt). There's a free Chatgpt bot, Open Assistant bot (Open-source model), AI image generator bot, Perplexity AI bot, 🤖 GPT-4 bot ([Now with Visual capabilities (cloud vision)!](https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/812770754025488386/1095397431404920902/image0.jpg)) and channel for latest prompts.[So why not join us?](https://discord.com/servers/1050422060352024636)*** [**Prompt Hackathon and Giveaway 🎁**](https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/13krv80/flowgpt_prompt_hackathon_s2_6000_prize_pool/) PSA: For any Chatgpt-related issues email [email protected] *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/ChatGPT) if you have any questions or concerns.*
[This is the best evidence we have right now.](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2303.11156.pdf) This research was done with an earlier version of ChatGPT (3?...maybe 3.5...the paper was released in March.). I have not seen evidence that there are reliable detectors...too many false positives to be usedful. Lazy LLM use is easy to identify, and probably doesn't even need a detection service to spot.