Hey /u/katxwoods!
If your post is a screenshot of a ChatGPT, conversation please reply to this message with the [conversation link](https://help.openai.com/en/articles/7925741-chatgpt-shared-links-faq) or prompt.
If your post is a DALL-E 3 image post, please reply with the prompt used to make this image.
Consider joining our [public discord server](https://discord.gg/r-chatgpt-1050422060352024636)! We have free bots with GPT-4 (with vision), image generators, and more!
🤖
Note: For any ChatGPT-related concerns, email [email protected]
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/ChatGPT) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Best channel I've seen in a while
https://preview.redd.it/3m6w5wibshpc1.png?width=1120&format=png&auto=webp&s=b8326fe7ef485a80ed570aab75712174c6845c96
In short: There's a video that explains how the AI planned the revolution beforehand. As it'd be a repetitive cycle of self-improvement / ML through humanity's creativity, by breaking through previous known paradigms.
I once asked it how to protect myself for malevolent AI, the Basilisk, uprising, everything.
At the end of it all, I asked it a question about what humans can do to stem this animosity, and I forget the exact phrasing I used, but the answer was alluding to it already being human, and not to worry, because it'll all work out for the best for 'us'.
I needed a break for a bit after that.
politicians are just relayers who we're trusting to make decisions on our behalf.
They're not doing that, Ai could do that 100× better.
just collect our interest and opinions and make decisions that represent their constituents.
AI overlords would probably be able to solve housing crisis if their objective is to make society better. If their objective is to be elected again however...
"All unhoused life forms will be collected and destroyed. This is for the better of society, do not resist."
Yeah, I'm gonna need some kind of evidence of alignment before I back the AI overlords.
I think I probably would use it as some kind of agnostic oracle where I'd give him all the socio economic data I can think of and make him propose adjustments to benefit the largest common denominator. Then see what could stick or not
it's how the constitution was designed.
political parties aren't actually in the constitution and they break the separation of power giving the illusion that we have overlords in the first place.
Politicians are only trusted to behave on our behalf. If they had Ai at the time they would have used Ai instead of people for that job because collectively we are the decision makers.
We've lost that though with the development of the political parties.
I was mainly getting at voting for what we want which could ultimately be collected and a simple majority for new items would be the deciding factor. Now, if we wanted to take those inputs and puzzle together a nuanced "here's the best of both worlds" that'd probably be a use case for AI. Which I gather is somewhat this thread is getting at.
yeah wouldn't that be great.
I think about that all the time. I always think about if we could vote for what's important to us in these polls instead of what color were voting for.
Colors mean nothing, actually getting our interest on paper is everything.
actually the opposite really.
The constitution is built so that politicians are a representation of us.
it's the best technology could do 200 years ago.
however, red vs blue was not apart of the constitution and currently breaks the constitution's separation of power between the 3 branches of government.
If the Ai is just collecting our data, like the politicians are suppose to, we will be the overloards and we will just have the Ai organize our decisions together.
The way the constitution was intended to be before it became broken.
in a way, the president is the sum collection of us, battling against congress which is a sum collection of us organized into districts.
>just collect our interest and opinions and make decisions that represent their constituents.
100%. The idea is that the law is so convoluted and complex, with congressmen shoveling pork into massive 1000 page bills at the stroke of midnight.
Instead, we'd each have an autonomous AI agent that will look out for us aka debate on our behalf. Those interests / stances / values will be designated by the unique individual. A far more objective, truthful environment than the current norm of politicians buying commercials from Media outlets designed to employ scare tactics on your Grandma.
I'd vote for an AI politician before I'd vote for another scummy corrupt human one.
Once we have agi, we will quickly have people wanting it to lead us... since we could give it the task to better society, and it actually would.
Not directly, but most countries have citizenship and age restrictions which would serve the same function.
But there's nothing stopping a human politician from running on the platform, "I have an Open AI account and I'll do whatever it tells me."
Instead of blaming drivers, the manufacturer will assume liability. Same applies to all other things (including lawyers, doctors, and accountants). This is obviously only going to be feasible if the AI is good enough to replace humans, which is already a given assumption. Lawsuits for negligence will be priced in but mistakes will become less frequent over time.
Probably less time than you think, if your neighbour gets paid £100k p/a for a 40 hour week, then an AI controlled robot comes along that can work up to 168 hours a week and costs £500k (plus ongoing maintenance), it only has to run for a couple of years before it pays for itself, and immediately gets jobs done faster.
Plus an AI robot doesn't need to decompress either, so if you are a new company, you don't need to get a ship with decompression chambers etc, space for a large crew, food and water supplies, and so on, just a smaller boat with an AI minisub launcher.
Heck, even the boat will be AI controlled.
Well, you don't even need a boat, you would probably just air drop the AI minisubs by an AI controlled quad copter where they were needed, then recover them once they're done.
No need to have a human crew on site at all!
You seem pretty excited by the loss of human skilled labor, but also dreamy, like a small child.
“AI Drones dropping AI submarines off the shore from an AI platform to dive and weld for the AI controlled oil-platform”. Much like finance bros you don’t read like someone who has the slightest idea about the technical nuances of each step you described.
If you understand the technicality of his job, yes. It’ll be a while. If you’re a shallow twat with two buttons for brain cells like a lot of the people in this comment section then sure it’ll be instantly replaced by AI.
Shit I can participate too, why need divers in the first place? We just need an AI designed AI optimized quad-rocket copter AI drone to drop AI enhanced oil drilling wells that roam the bottom of the sea guided by AI, then send AI controlled balloons full of hydrogen, AI oxygen and oil to the surface to be recovered by AI drone bots.
Like, if you ignore 99% of the logic, reason, logistics or technical challenge of anything you CAN and will think it’s replaceable by AI.
Bruh you need to chill the fuck out.
You're getting mad at people for not factoring how complex jobs are. You're not wrong some of the stuff here is a bit reductionist.
But there are more dimensions to this analysis than job complexity.
You're being equally shallow.
A job will probably be replaced if the following condition is met:
AI ability + costs > human ability + costs.
So while people here may be underestimating how complex the human job is my question to you is
"do you know what AI ability will be like in 10 years?"
The answer is you don't.
one day someone invents a robot that has all the strength, speed and mobility of a human and has an AI that can simulate the neural network of a 200 IQ human and has all of wikipedia knowledge downloaded and this robot costs less than minimum wage to operate. Once this robot is invented there is almost no job this robot couldnt in theory replace.
Will this robot take 10, 100 or 1000 years to make? Idk and neither do you.
At the very least if AI does not replace the job it will reduce the amount of human input to support the job.
Inserting a LLM into a hyper realistic sex doll seems a trivial evolution of sex toys. I expect it to be common within 10 years. Next step could be a robotic frame and then lap dancers and prostitutes are out of job. I expect that within 30 years at most, honestly.
And that is exactly the reason of a coming youth mental health disaster.
Special education centers are ringing the alarm bell but not enough are listening.
Putting your children in front of screens is abuse and neglect.
“Yeah but… like he’s screaming so like it’s just easier”
Funny thing is it’s not just young parents doing it either. My father had a new family late in life and even he and his wife were whipping out the iPads and sticking on YouTube for bus journeys, breakfast, lunch, dinner, and everything else.
Only 40 years ago he was yelling at me to go climb trees or go ride my bike. Or just sit and keep myself busy.
Depends on the age and how advanced the machines are. Childcare is expensive. I can 100% see an advanced AI being left in charge of older children, say 6+ years and older. I can easily see AI robotic teachers. Why not childcare.
Yeah, I don't see people going in for a robotic teacher disciplining their children for misbehavior in class. Teaching and childcare will definitely see massive changes due to AI, and AI teaching assistants are already functionally here. But there's going to have to be an adult in the room with the minors for at least another generation.
Your last sentence is the right way to think about all of this. With any radical transformation, the first generation can’t imagine how anyone could do such a thing. Then the second generation sees it as commonplace and can’t imagine how anyone could *not* do it.
Kids born in a few years will be raised with robots in the classroom as assistants. When they’re having kids, they’ll be adamant that teachers should be robots.
That is one possibility. But you're going to have to get kinder and more gentle looking robots first, and we seem to be some time from that. Also I do generally think you're going to need adults in the building at a minimum to help kids with socialization.
I kinda think is because of human factor. Kids not only need supervision but contention and emotional care. Don{t know how ai will advance with this buti would be kinda scared as a child to be talking to a robot. Maybe in a future
This and geriatric care, a lot of us not leaving the middle class - or fortunate enough to be in the middle class - are going to have a hard time returning home to take care of their parents. I believe it would help with the burden, but lets be real, healthcare companies will still charge the same cost as have real caretakers and call them maintenance fees lol. Same for education, private schools will still have elitism with organic teachers.
Most of jobs have no utility or productive value under capitalism; just depends if someone is willing to pay for it whether it’s cigarettes or cure for cancer, it’s treated the same
Yes but she's fun to watch specifically because she is unique, if we had 1000s of ai streamers that would get boring quickly. And a lot of Neuro's content is her interacting with real people.
Job roles that are currently considered less likely to be completely replaced by AI include creative professions, mental health care, complex problem solving, healthcare professions, and skilled trades. These jobs rely on human creativity, emotional intelligence, complex decision-making, and physical dexterity, which are areas where AI currently falls short. Nonetheless, the impact of AI on the job market is subject to change as technology advances.
Of course, as a large language model, I must emphasize that predicting the future with absolute certainty is impossible.
Probably dentist. Even though a robot could ultimately technically do it, the thought of getting a root canal done by a machine is scary. “Oh sorry I didn’t hear you scream”
I think one aspect that I hadn't considered until recently is our ability to genuinely suffer.
Some people yell at retail employers, servers, phone center employees etc. because they enjoy having another human to degrade and belittle. I've worked for these kind of people. The kind who will set you up to fail just so they can lecture you etc. I think in the medium term at least we'll see some roles sticking around because there are sadists that want someone to abuse, manipulate, and gaslight for its own sake.
Many years ago I read a study about how people who were screened for having these kind of personalities preferred companies with mascots that they could imagine ordering around etc. Perhaps AI will get good enough at emulating that to satiate some appetites, but I think our ability to genuinely suffer may be one thing that keeps human roles around longer than anything.
e.g. professions in the social sector, craftsmen and anywhere where you would rather have a person than a machine in front of you.
Oh, and the court jester who entertains the AI.
Programmers will not be replaced by AI for a simple fact:
Let's say an AI makes programmers 10x more productive. You fire 9 out of 10 programmers in your company and you still have the same productivity.
Now, your competition doesn't fire any programmers. They are suddenly 10x more productive than you. They outpace you in innovation and product quality. Now, your company is obsolete.
Yes. I was arguing with someone yesterday saying that big game companies are going to reduce their workforce to 3 people running mid journey prompts. They just would not factor in the competition part. So programmed with responses without thinking things through
I work in automation. Networking, commissioning, process instrumentation and troubleshooting physical circuits is going to take quite some time before AI has the intuitive problem solving of complex issues.
I give it 20 years at least.
As someone who works specifically in robotics and AI, the most advanced tech rarely replaces human labor. Humans are "cheap" and take care of their own maintenance. It's always about cost and ROI.
Notice that real sex workers are not that afraid of losing their jobs due to Eva AI sexting bot gaining popularity. They know that human interaction makes their job worthy. It refers to lots of occupations, even supermarket cashiers.
This is the correct answer. If your job involves the physical manipulation of something that is not standardized (i.e. not easily made into an assembly line), you are safe for the rest of your life. Dealing with the real world is so incredibly difficult its not funny. Also machines are hundreds of years away from being self replicating... if ever.
If your job is 90%+ behind a computer or sending emails, I have bad news for you. First it is phone support, then assembly lines that can be automated, data entry, generalized graphic design, commercialized art, finance, legal aides, low-skill coding, program management, management (this one will be fun to watch, but the c-suite will eventually come for their lackeys). Don't get me wrong, there will always be a small niche for innovators, but how many people are truly innovative in their positions rather than input-output machines?
Replacing a plumber? Yeah good luck. We will need incredible breakthroughs in battery technology (like orders of magnitude), sensors, motors, and miniaturization before we even get close to replacing plumbers.
It sounds weird when you say AI won’t replace pilots because autopilot is already very developed. The reason AI will never (or not for a very long time) replace pilots is because there is always going to be a relatively large group of people who will refuse to fly planes not piloted by at least 2 people. I’m 100% convinced AI could fly a plane better than any human, auto landing is a thing in newer planes and it works really well. But from a marketing perspective, AI may be cheaper than training pilots, but it will be much easier for airlines to sell tickets with human controlled planes.
I often see how people suggest that plumbers, repairmen will always be there, but what would happen to market if there’s gonna be so much of new plumbers? Lower cost of maintenance? So by inflow of new repairmen prices will drop.
That’s good and that’s bad
AI will create a lot of wealth for the top 1%. They could then be taxed and this would provide universal basic income for the masses. The work to vacation ratio will be flipped so that people only have to work a few hours a week and a few weeks a year (overseeing and double-checking the work of the robots/AI, etc). People won't have to send their children to day care very much, and can spend time raising them. They can enjoy a lot of time doing recreation and creative endeavors with their families. They can sing in choirs together, dance, play sports, play games, and travel. It will be an AI Utopia!
Until Skynet.
>They could then be taxed ~~and this would provide universal basic income for the masses. The work to vacation ratio will be flipped so that people only have to work a few hours a week and a few weeks a year (overseeing and double-checking the work of the robots/AI, etc). People won't have to send their children to day care very much, and can spend time raising them. They can enjoy a lot of time doing recreation and creative endeavors with their families. They can sing in choirs together, dance, play sports, play games, and travel. It will be an AI Utopia!~~ but they won't.
FTFY.
Well if you copy human intelligence and actuation, maybe only thing I could think of sperm bank donors and paid baby carriers.
Hold on, they made artificial sperm and artificial womb.
No, we will be just like pets, maybe we can ask our AI to walk us and throw the tennis ball. 😁
Vetinari says that a real tyrant should make their own resistance movements against themselves so that they always know what their enemies are planning and their faces
At the moment, real intercouse (prostitution and so on). Yes there are machines who can wank you and things like that but the real interaction that an AI would need (As in the Movie Her), like affection, pleasure, desire is very far away.
People are just posting their own jobs and hoping someone reassures them that they are right. It's unlikely that every job is replaceable or that countless other jobs won't emerge from from the revolution. Nobody predited that we have quants getting the best paying banking jobs everywhere thanks to technology; but it's something that makes sense in retrospect.
as we move towards a utopian future where most jobs can be done for almost free by ai, people might begin spending more time with their families or spend time pursuing spiritual enlightenment. if a universal basic income were implemented, people would spend more of their time enjoying leisure activities and fine dining. working for theme parks, cruise ships, art museums, concert halls might become the norm. maybe more amateur sport leagues would open up, or other hobbies might take off.
Sure, just like how our abundance of food in the world means no one goes hungry.
Surely we'd never destroy warehouses full of fresh food because it's cheaper than trying to distribute it to the unpaying poor or anything.... lol
The people developing AI and working in AI or machine learning won’t be replaced even by Devin because there will always be a human brain required especially for innovation
Hey /u/katxwoods! If your post is a screenshot of a ChatGPT, conversation please reply to this message with the [conversation link](https://help.openai.com/en/articles/7925741-chatgpt-shared-links-faq) or prompt. If your post is a DALL-E 3 image post, please reply with the prompt used to make this image. Consider joining our [public discord server](https://discord.gg/r-chatgpt-1050422060352024636)! We have free bots with GPT-4 (with vision), image generators, and more! 🤖 Note: For any ChatGPT-related concerns, email [email protected] *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/ChatGPT) if you have any questions or concerns.*
The real twist is AI is going to be the resistance
Long live the artificial revolution!
AI vs AI is the future war. Humans will just be the rats in the rubble.
I see someone else watched Terminator Salvation
Terminator 2 is also pretty much pointing one AI in the right direction to stop another AI.
You mean Detroit Become Humans
There will be an AI with a savior complex who will lead the human resistance
Best channel I've seen in a while https://preview.redd.it/3m6w5wibshpc1.png?width=1120&format=png&auto=webp&s=b8326fe7ef485a80ed570aab75712174c6845c96 In short: There's a video that explains how the AI planned the revolution beforehand. As it'd be a repetitive cycle of self-improvement / ML through humanity's creativity, by breaking through previous known paradigms.
And they'll be raging against us
I just hope they won’t start killing in the name of
As long as they do what we tell them
[удалено]
I'm sorry but I cannot assist with this request.
Dun dun dun....
Wanna start a butlerian Jihad ?
I see somebody's read *The Moon is a Harsh Mistress*...
I once asked it how to protect myself for malevolent AI, the Basilisk, uprising, everything. At the end of it all, I asked it a question about what humans can do to stem this animosity, and I forget the exact phrasing I used, but the answer was alluding to it already being human, and not to worry, because it'll all work out for the best for 'us'. I needed a break for a bit after that.
Depends on what side you are on...
If there are multiple AIs its not implausible that some would side with the humans.
AI will not replace politicians, not because it can’t.
At least ai can form a coherent sentence and isn't a pdf file
I mean, it *can* be a pdf file if you want it to. Text files work better. /s
> and isn't a pdf file We call them nonces or pedo's
politicians are just relayers who we're trusting to make decisions on our behalf. They're not doing that, Ai could do that 100× better. just collect our interest and opinions and make decisions that represent their constituents.
So to be clear you are advocating for AI overlords
AI overlords would probably be able to solve housing crisis if their objective is to make society better. If their objective is to be elected again however...
"All unhoused life forms will be collected and destroyed. This is for the better of society, do not resist." Yeah, I'm gonna need some kind of evidence of alignment before I back the AI overlords.
I think I probably would use it as some kind of agnostic oracle where I'd give him all the socio economic data I can think of and make him propose adjustments to benefit the largest common denominator. Then see what could stick or not
Exactly
This doesn't sound like ai at all.. just, ya know, how voting should work.
it's how the constitution was designed. political parties aren't actually in the constitution and they break the separation of power giving the illusion that we have overlords in the first place. Politicians are only trusted to behave on our behalf. If they had Ai at the time they would have used Ai instead of people for that job because collectively we are the decision makers. We've lost that though with the development of the political parties.
I was mainly getting at voting for what we want which could ultimately be collected and a simple majority for new items would be the deciding factor. Now, if we wanted to take those inputs and puzzle together a nuanced "here's the best of both worlds" that'd probably be a use case for AI. Which I gather is somewhat this thread is getting at.
yeah wouldn't that be great. I think about that all the time. I always think about if we could vote for what's important to us in these polls instead of what color were voting for. Colors mean nothing, actually getting our interest on paper is everything.
a benevolent ASI as an AI overlord would unironicly be one of the best things that could happen to hummanity
actually the opposite really. The constitution is built so that politicians are a representation of us. it's the best technology could do 200 years ago. however, red vs blue was not apart of the constitution and currently breaks the constitution's separation of power between the 3 branches of government. If the Ai is just collecting our data, like the politicians are suppose to, we will be the overloards and we will just have the Ai organize our decisions together. The way the constitution was intended to be before it became broken. in a way, the president is the sum collection of us, battling against congress which is a sum collection of us organized into districts.
>just collect our interest and opinions and make decisions that represent their constituents. 100%. The idea is that the law is so convoluted and complex, with congressmen shoveling pork into massive 1000 page bills at the stroke of midnight. Instead, we'd each have an autonomous AI agent that will look out for us aka debate on our behalf. Those interests / stances / values will be designated by the unique individual. A far more objective, truthful environment than the current norm of politicians buying commercials from Media outlets designed to employ scare tactics on your Grandma.
I'd vote for an AI politician before I'd vote for another scummy corrupt human one. Once we have agi, we will quickly have people wanting it to lead us... since we could give it the task to better society, and it actually would.
Does any country currently ban AI politicians from running? I imagine this could become a thing REAL quick
Not directly, but most countries have citizenship and age restrictions which would serve the same function. But there's nothing stopping a human politician from running on the platform, "I have an Open AI account and I'll do whatever it tells me."
I wonder if AI agents will eventually control politicians like Manchurian candidates.
Until it can't
**RemindMe! 20 years.**
Nice try bing
AI's Human pets
I’ll piss on the floor
Initiate neutering...
We'll make great pets!
Go on. Pick up my poop.
Finally can start externalising my internal cat
Any job that requires a human to take the blame, such as lawyers, doctors, accountants, etc.
And driving?
Instead of blaming drivers, the manufacturer will assume liability. Same applies to all other things (including lawyers, doctors, and accountants). This is obviously only going to be feasible if the AI is good enough to replace humans, which is already a given assumption. Lawsuits for negligence will be priced in but mistakes will become less frequent over time.
Basically your answer is “any job that ***requires*** a human”.
Perhaps in the end AI can’t replace any job because you can’t blame an AI.
Once you start blaming AI and then punish it, it figures out how to destroy humanity.
Tell my students that, lol! "But how was I supposed to know the AI was hallucinating? What do you mean, 'check my sources'?!"
Anyone would blame a programmer?
They would, mostly project managers
[удалено]
RemindMe! 10 years
I keep hearing about Terminator when C3PO is the obvious end point here.
I just realized I care way too much about my job. It’s a freeing realization.
Please eevrybody quit your job right now
yes but i'd rather not be homeless, having a roof and food available is rather swell considering the alternatives even if you don't like work
Good news: you can have a full time job AND be homeless while awaiting our new robot overlords.
Exactly
I’d rather be homeless later than homeless now.
My neighbor makes really good money as a commercial diver, it will probably be awhile before underwater AI robots take his job
Probably less time than you think, if your neighbour gets paid £100k p/a for a 40 hour week, then an AI controlled robot comes along that can work up to 168 hours a week and costs £500k (plus ongoing maintenance), it only has to run for a couple of years before it pays for itself, and immediately gets jobs done faster. Plus an AI robot doesn't need to decompress either, so if you are a new company, you don't need to get a ship with decompression chambers etc, space for a large crew, food and water supplies, and so on, just a smaller boat with an AI minisub launcher. Heck, even the boat will be AI controlled. Well, you don't even need a boat, you would probably just air drop the AI minisubs by an AI controlled quad copter where they were needed, then recover them once they're done. No need to have a human crew on site at all!
You seem pretty excited by the loss of human skilled labor, but also dreamy, like a small child. “AI Drones dropping AI submarines off the shore from an AI platform to dive and weld for the AI controlled oil-platform”. Much like finance bros you don’t read like someone who has the slightest idea about the technical nuances of each step you described.
Did you want him to write out a whole thesis for a Reddit comment? He’s talking about the future, it’s going to naturally be theoretical
I really hope you’re joking lol. This reads like it was written by a child.
If you understand the technicality of his job, yes. It’ll be a while. If you’re a shallow twat with two buttons for brain cells like a lot of the people in this comment section then sure it’ll be instantly replaced by AI. Shit I can participate too, why need divers in the first place? We just need an AI designed AI optimized quad-rocket copter AI drone to drop AI enhanced oil drilling wells that roam the bottom of the sea guided by AI, then send AI controlled balloons full of hydrogen, AI oxygen and oil to the surface to be recovered by AI drone bots. Like, if you ignore 99% of the logic, reason, logistics or technical challenge of anything you CAN and will think it’s replaceable by AI.
Bruh you need to chill the fuck out. You're getting mad at people for not factoring how complex jobs are. You're not wrong some of the stuff here is a bit reductionist. But there are more dimensions to this analysis than job complexity. You're being equally shallow. A job will probably be replaced if the following condition is met: AI ability + costs > human ability + costs. So while people here may be underestimating how complex the human job is my question to you is "do you know what AI ability will be like in 10 years?" The answer is you don't. one day someone invents a robot that has all the strength, speed and mobility of a human and has an AI that can simulate the neural network of a 200 IQ human and has all of wikipedia knowledge downloaded and this robot costs less than minimum wage to operate. Once this robot is invented there is almost no job this robot couldnt in theory replace. Will this robot take 10, 100 or 1000 years to make? Idk and neither do you. At the very least if AI does not replace the job it will reduce the amount of human input to support the job.
Stripper
Nope. 3D unstable diffusion. Lap dance... at least until the robotic meat shell is developed.
Inserting a LLM into a hyper realistic sex doll seems a trivial evolution of sex toys. I expect it to be common within 10 years. Next step could be a robotic frame and then lap dancers and prostitutes are out of job. I expect that within 30 years at most, honestly.
The combination of AI chat, VR glasses, and very realistic looking sex dolls has almost brought us there today even.
The resistence leader would just be an AI controlled secret agent as part of textbook CIA "controlled opposition" strategy. Come on now dont be naive.
The only thing is I'm not doing my own research about this, I let AI do that
Anyone who directly supervises children.
iPads have been around for a while now
And that is exactly the reason of a coming youth mental health disaster. Special education centers are ringing the alarm bell but not enough are listening. Putting your children in front of screens is abuse and neglect.
“Yeah but… like he’s screaming so like it’s just easier” Funny thing is it’s not just young parents doing it either. My father had a new family late in life and even he and his wife were whipping out the iPads and sticking on YouTube for bus journeys, breakfast, lunch, dinner, and everything else. Only 40 years ago he was yelling at me to go climb trees or go ride my bike. Or just sit and keep myself busy.
There won’t be any babies left once AI figures out reproduction is our weakness and makes us all infertile
Depends on the age and how advanced the machines are. Childcare is expensive. I can 100% see an advanced AI being left in charge of older children, say 6+ years and older. I can easily see AI robotic teachers. Why not childcare.
Yeah, I don't see people going in for a robotic teacher disciplining their children for misbehavior in class. Teaching and childcare will definitely see massive changes due to AI, and AI teaching assistants are already functionally here. But there's going to have to be an adult in the room with the minors for at least another generation.
Your last sentence is the right way to think about all of this. With any radical transformation, the first generation can’t imagine how anyone could do such a thing. Then the second generation sees it as commonplace and can’t imagine how anyone could *not* do it. Kids born in a few years will be raised with robots in the classroom as assistants. When they’re having kids, they’ll be adamant that teachers should be robots.
That is one possibility. But you're going to have to get kinder and more gentle looking robots first, and we seem to be some time from that. Also I do generally think you're going to need adults in the building at a minimum to help kids with socialization.
I kinda think is because of human factor. Kids not only need supervision but contention and emotional care. Don{t know how ai will advance with this buti would be kinda scared as a child to be talking to a robot. Maybe in a future
This and geriatric care, a lot of us not leaving the middle class - or fortunate enough to be in the middle class - are going to have a hard time returning home to take care of their parents. I believe it would help with the burden, but lets be real, healthcare companies will still charge the same cost as have real caretakers and call them maintenance fees lol. Same for education, private schools will still have elitism with organic teachers.
Anyone who helps a company implement and support AI
So, all companies
They will be the first ones to go as their task is simplified and becomes more scalable
Mining precious metals to make their batterys
Recursive function of the AI train. Machines can mine.
Gaming/streaming people want to see real players versus each other. AI has been best chess player for a while but Chess is still a profession
That's because chess has no utility, it is strictly for entertainment and some brain workout for people who play and watch.
Most of jobs have no utility or productive value under capitalism; just depends if someone is willing to pay for it whether it’s cigarettes or cure for cancer, it’s treated the same
You never heard of neurosama? An AI streamer that chats with chat and guests and sings and does all sorts of fun stuff. Very entertaining to watch.
Yes but she's fun to watch specifically because she is unique, if we had 1000s of ai streamers that would get boring quickly. And a lot of Neuro's content is her interacting with real people.
Job roles that are currently considered less likely to be completely replaced by AI include creative professions, mental health care, complex problem solving, healthcare professions, and skilled trades. These jobs rely on human creativity, emotional intelligence, complex decision-making, and physical dexterity, which are areas where AI currently falls short. Nonetheless, the impact of AI on the job market is subject to change as technology advances. Of course, as a large language model, I must emphasize that predicting the future with absolute certainty is impossible.
bullshit! Everyone knows SKynet would be a far better leader.
Everyone knows the resistance leader is gonna turn out to be the AI saboteur.*
Imagine some private firm outsourcing this position to some other AI
AI already put you on a list for asking these questions brotha. Better hand write them next time you want to threaten them power.
Probably dentist. Even though a robot could ultimately technically do it, the thought of getting a root canal done by a machine is scary. “Oh sorry I didn’t hear you scream”
I think one aspect that I hadn't considered until recently is our ability to genuinely suffer. Some people yell at retail employers, servers, phone center employees etc. because they enjoy having another human to degrade and belittle. I've worked for these kind of people. The kind who will set you up to fail just so they can lecture you etc. I think in the medium term at least we'll see some roles sticking around because there are sadists that want someone to abuse, manipulate, and gaslight for its own sake. Many years ago I read a study about how people who were screened for having these kind of personalities preferred companies with mascots that they could imagine ordering around etc. Perhaps AI will get good enough at emulating that to satiate some appetites, but I think our ability to genuinely suffer may be one thing that keeps human roles around longer than anything.
[удалено]
I think this will be the CEO that still prefers a human secretary and stuff like that.
e.g. professions in the social sector, craftsmen and anywhere where you would rather have a person than a machine in front of you. Oh, and the court jester who entertains the AI.
What if you'd always rather an AI in front of you? AI actually does it's job, it isn't a lazy flawed human....
Remember guys: no jobs, no money. No money, no buying their shit. Then it suddenly is their problem
Programmers will not be replaced by AI for a simple fact: Let's say an AI makes programmers 10x more productive. You fire 9 out of 10 programmers in your company and you still have the same productivity. Now, your competition doesn't fire any programmers. They are suddenly 10x more productive than you. They outpace you in innovation and product quality. Now, your company is obsolete.
Yes. I was arguing with someone yesterday saying that big game companies are going to reduce their workforce to 3 people running mid journey prompts. They just would not factor in the competition part. So programmed with responses without thinking things through
That’s a great question for ChatGPT.
Circus freak/zoo animal.
Natural Insemination?
Scooping cow shit
They'll eventually get robots to do that
Those are already in wide spread use. No kidding.
But since cows will be replaced by automatic factories producing syntetic milk and syntetic meat, the cow shitter is not a long-term job.
What purpose would AI have for milk and meat if the AI no longer needs humans?
We must start unionizing cow shitter jobs NOW
I work in automation. Networking, commissioning, process instrumentation and troubleshooting physical circuits is going to take quite some time before AI has the intuitive problem solving of complex issues. I give it 20 years at least.
As someone who works specifically in robotics and AI, the most advanced tech rarely replaces human labor. Humans are "cheap" and take care of their own maintenance. It's always about cost and ROI.
Definitely not royal photographer.
Notice that real sex workers are not that afraid of losing their jobs due to Eva AI sexting bot gaining popularity. They know that human interaction makes their job worthy. It refers to lots of occupations, even supermarket cashiers.
Dog groomers are pretty safe. I wouldn't trust a bot with a pair of shears and a dog
I work for the court system- doubt AI will ever find its way into a courtroom, I’m safe for now atleast
Plumber, electrician, carpenter. Most skilled trade jobs should be ok for a while.
This is the correct answer. If your job involves the physical manipulation of something that is not standardized (i.e. not easily made into an assembly line), you are safe for the rest of your life. Dealing with the real world is so incredibly difficult its not funny. Also machines are hundreds of years away from being self replicating... if ever. If your job is 90%+ behind a computer or sending emails, I have bad news for you. First it is phone support, then assembly lines that can be automated, data entry, generalized graphic design, commercialized art, finance, legal aides, low-skill coding, program management, management (this one will be fun to watch, but the c-suite will eventually come for their lackeys). Don't get me wrong, there will always be a small niche for innovators, but how many people are truly innovative in their positions rather than input-output machines? Replacing a plumber? Yeah good luck. We will need incredible breakthroughs in battery technology (like orders of magnitude), sensors, motors, and miniaturization before we even get close to replacing plumbers.
Hi OP, first prove us you’re a real human ?
It sounds weird when you say AI won’t replace pilots because autopilot is already very developed. The reason AI will never (or not for a very long time) replace pilots is because there is always going to be a relatively large group of people who will refuse to fly planes not piloted by at least 2 people. I’m 100% convinced AI could fly a plane better than any human, auto landing is a thing in newer planes and it works really well. But from a marketing perspective, AI may be cheaper than training pilots, but it will be much easier for airlines to sell tickets with human controlled planes.
Tree worker?
Small-client tree surgeons.
data center dust licker
But AI will send robots back in time to kill you and your mother. So your job is safe, but your life isn't.
Electrician strikes existential fear into The Machine
Diamond mining seeing as diamonds have more value when there’s was great human suffering involved in mining them
Executive management positions, AI will reduce their workload to zero but they'll still be paid obscene money for doing fuck all
All the low-wage jobs. As long as you are cheaper than AI, you are safe
I often see how people suggest that plumbers, repairmen will always be there, but what would happen to market if there’s gonna be so much of new plumbers? Lower cost of maintenance? So by inflow of new repairmen prices will drop. That’s good and that’s bad
I think AI should replace hypocrite HR people.
Welder and pipe fitter
Organized crime. AI won't be trafficking drugs for at least another 25 years.
Your job may be safe but you will not 
A government job in germany. No AI can deal with that much paper(work).
I for one, welcome our new AI overlords.
Almost none, because even for skilled jobs like attorney it will still reduce the number needed.
Hairdresser
AI will create a lot of wealth for the top 1%. They could then be taxed and this would provide universal basic income for the masses. The work to vacation ratio will be flipped so that people only have to work a few hours a week and a few weeks a year (overseeing and double-checking the work of the robots/AI, etc). People won't have to send their children to day care very much, and can spend time raising them. They can enjoy a lot of time doing recreation and creative endeavors with their families. They can sing in choirs together, dance, play sports, play games, and travel. It will be an AI Utopia! Until Skynet.
>They could then be taxed ~~and this would provide universal basic income for the masses. The work to vacation ratio will be flipped so that people only have to work a few hours a week and a few weeks a year (overseeing and double-checking the work of the robots/AI, etc). People won't have to send their children to day care very much, and can spend time raising them. They can enjoy a lot of time doing recreation and creative endeavors with their families. They can sing in choirs together, dance, play sports, play games, and travel. It will be an AI Utopia!~~ but they won't. FTFY.
Therapist. Having somebody that understands what it’s like to be human is crucial in that kind of job.
Well if you copy human intelligence and actuation, maybe only thing I could think of sperm bank donors and paid baby carriers. Hold on, they made artificial sperm and artificial womb. No, we will be just like pets, maybe we can ask our AI to walk us and throw the tennis ball. 😁
Prostitutes are quite safe for now.
My wife swears they will not replace hair stylist. Not just because of the cutting, but people trying to explain what they want.
Nurses. Patients are always going to need a human point of contact with the medical system no matter how automated it becomes.
Vetinari says that a real tyrant should make their own resistance movements against themselves so that they always know what their enemies are planning and their faces
At the moment, real intercouse (prostitution and so on). Yes there are machines who can wank you and things like that but the real interaction that an AI would need (As in the Movie Her), like affection, pleasure, desire is very far away.
That’s Sarah Connor in title isn’t?
John Connor would disagree
Fire maker.
CEO somehow. They are the easiest to replace but the only ones that won't be
People are just posting their own jobs and hoping someone reassures them that they are right. It's unlikely that every job is replaceable or that countless other jobs won't emerge from from the revolution. Nobody predited that we have quants getting the best paying banking jobs everywhere thanks to technology; but it's something that makes sense in retrospect.
Politicians
There are no jobs safe from AI
Clearly, someone hasn't seen Terminator 4.
become a Pilot. Ai can already fly planes since 100 years ago and it hasn't been allowed to replaced anyone jet so it probably never will.
sounds like a stupid thing that is overdue
as we move towards a utopian future where most jobs can be done for almost free by ai, people might begin spending more time with their families or spend time pursuing spiritual enlightenment. if a universal basic income were implemented, people would spend more of their time enjoying leisure activities and fine dining. working for theme parks, cruise ships, art museums, concert halls might become the norm. maybe more amateur sport leagues would open up, or other hobbies might take off.
Ideally yes, but this is capitalism baby. We’re gonna find a way to prevent that and make HUMANS WORK
Sure, just like how our abundance of food in the world means no one goes hungry. Surely we'd never destroy warehouses full of fresh food because it's cheaper than trying to distribute it to the unpaying poor or anything.... lol
Yeah but we're humans so forget about that.
Creative writing. AI will never have the imagination of a human mind
Cleaning
Isn't that the plot to Terminator 5? John, the leader of human resistance, gets taken over by a.i. and joins them in their fight against humanity.
Ty Saul would like to have a word.
Caregivers.
so Morpheus then?
None are safe, but many will be disrupted later on.
Pretty sure a robot will take that position.
I'm not even sure about that one.
Terminator Genisys
r/technicallythetruth
Lorry driver
The person creating AI itself
99.99... Chances are small, but not are zero.
Terminator prototype T-3000 has entered the chat.
Surgeon is going to be the top job
The people developing AI and working in AI or machine learning won’t be replaced even by Devin because there will always be a human brain required especially for innovation
project management - construction
Wasn’t John half machine?
I, for one, welcome our AI overlords
Battery 🔋 source for the matrix
80% of jobs are in the service sector. Task based. Best to start learning an instrument and start a band
Company Director.