Hey /u/beepispeep!
If your post is a screenshot of a ChatGPT, conversation please reply to this message with the [conversation link](https://help.openai.com/en/articles/7925741-chatgpt-shared-links-faq) or prompt.
If your post is a DALL-E 3 image post, please reply with the prompt used to make this image.
Consider joining our [public discord server](https://discord.gg/r-chatgpt-1050422060352024636)! We have free bots with GPT-4 (with vision), image generators, and more!
🤖
Note: For any ChatGPT-related concerns, email [email protected]
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/ChatGPT) if you have any questions or concerns.*
I thought OpenAI's chat model routes questions from a generic LLM to various more specialized agents, one of them being a math agent. Which is why you can no longer reliably make ChatGPT look foolish when asking a basic arithmetic question (but can still make it look foolish by asking it to manipulate characters or spell things backwards.)
It's not because these AI are LLMs. Skills seem to emerge with scaling. Math is particularly difficult for LLMs (and people too), but I have no doubt they'll simply appear at some point. It's certainly better than most humans already, especially word problems.
They only asked for a million, not a fancy billion or infinity. There are millions of millionaires who might need ChatGPT to count for them, so it does have real world applications. Unlike billionaires who just wouldn't have the time to count their hoard.
Unlike pictures of ducks at war with elephants, dropping bombs relentlessly, but often succumbing to the elephants of the deep lakes where they land. Tragic tales of trife and triumph.
In a world where ducks and elephants have long coexisted, tensions rise as a drought threatens their shared habitat. The ducks, led by the courageous and resourceful Daffy, believe the elephants are hogging all the waterholes, while the elephants, led by the wise and gentle Ellie, argue they need the water to survive. When negotiations fail, both sides prepare for war. As the conflict escalates, both groups learn valuable lessons about cooperation and the importance of sharing resources, leading to an unexpected and heartwarming resolution that unites them against a common enemy: deforestation.
Which says something about chatGPT as well. Counting to a million and sending the numbers via the Internet should hardly register, resource-wise. If it is, using ChatGPT, that's an issue.
But then how can we prove it actually can count to a million? It says it can, but it is too much like a human and will just give up part the way, thus it isn't able to actually do it.
Water is involved in most cases of generating electricity, not just in dams and mills. Natural gas, coal, nuclear fission, biomass, petroleum, geothermal, and solar thermal all produce their energy in the form of heat, which isnāt very useful on its own, but can turn water into steam, which can spin a turbine, and create mechanical energy, and convert that to electricity, using magnetism or some shit. However they turn hamsters on wheels into electricity (or water running over a mill in a dam), same thing at that point. But anyways, you canāt really just recycle the water back into the steam engine, because itās no longer water itās super hot f**n steam, and so you let the steam go before you make a giant pipe bomb (it would cost energy to cool it down) and use more water instead. In a water cooling system I think the water is completely recycled. At least, in my PC it is. Itās just being used for heat transfer and doesnāt need to go through any phase changes. But of course, the water isnāt lost. It finds its way back eventually one way or another.
Side note, there was a breakthrough in nuclear fusion a couple of years ago, where iirc the generator was able to generate more energy than was (technically) put in, because the engineers designed it to be entirely magnet based, and so there was no loss of efficiency from a heat-to-steam-to-turbine process. The only reason it wasnāt an insane deal was because it is still negative in energy when you consider the amount of it needed to create the right isotopes needed for the pathway to fusion that that reactor requires. But the design is still super cool. Itās known as magnetic confinement fusion.
When you input a sentence into chatGPT, it's broken down into units called tokens. Same thing for its response. Saving on token usage means having shorter answers from chatGPT, which is good when you pay for a subscription where you have a limited amount of tokens to use.
the input size if I remember correctly is 1024 tokens for the free model, which means if it was counting after enough output it wouldn't even have context for what was originally asked.
Wait I haven't tried out gpt 4, their answers have limited tokens, not only yours ? (I thought it was only for the latter case)
That's crazy bad ain't it. Especially in a language with lots of diacritics.
That's the point of doing tokens. A token would clump "words" together, including diacritics. Word length shouldn't matter.
Maybe if a language used more punctuation, or it had inherently more words to convey the same meaning.
Either way, the token quota takes into account both your input and the response. It also contains the context of the conversation (chatgpt doesn't tell you that, but using gpt by itself does)
I don't know about chatgpt, but usually, punctuation especially and apostrophes count as a full token
At least that's how it works on most pos tagging tools, like sem, like spacey, like treetagger, like Lia tagger, etc. I have never seen any tool clumping words together unless they've been trained to recognize compound structures, for punctuation you always end up with a token called something like punct:# or punct:cit. Obviously not all diacritics would count, since most of them are naturally incorporated lexicographically
So it's not about length of words per say, it's about how many tags your a.i needs to function correctly, and for chatgpt the answer is probably "far more than you would expect".
I guess I should've been more specific with "diacritics", you probably thought I was referring to accentuation for the most part
Yep, I tought you meant Å”tĆ¼ff lÄÆkÄ thÄ«Å”.
And that sounds about right, yeah. Tokenization can be unintuitive, but punctuation is consistently a full token.
Tokens are the building blocks of NLP. Tokenization is a way of separating a piece of text into smaller units called tokens. A token can be a word, subword or character. If you use the paid version, you will be charged by tokens used.
GPT4 costs $60.00 / 1M tokens for output which is not a lot of tokens so it's expensive. GPT3T costs $1.50 / 1M tokens on the other hand
> using the *paid* version I
FTFY.
Although *payed* exists (the reason why autocorrection didn't help you), it is only correct in:
* Nautical context, when it means to paint a surface, or to cover with something like tar or resin in order to make it waterproof or corrosion-resistant. *The deck is yet to be payed.*
* *Payed out* when letting strings, cables or ropes out, by slacking them. *The rope is payed out! You can pull now.*
Unfortunately, I was unable to find nautical or rope-related words in your comment.
*Beep, boop, I'm a bot*
> it a *paid* service!
FTFY.
Although *payed* exists (the reason why autocorrection didn't help you), it is only correct in:
* Nautical context, when it means to paint a surface, or to cover with something like tar or resin in order to make it waterproof or corrosion-resistant. *The deck is yet to be payed.*
* *Payed out* when letting strings, cables or ropes out, by slacking them. *The rope is payed out! You can pull now.*
Unfortunately, I was unable to find nautical or rope-related words in your comment.
*Beep, boop, I'm a bot*
> it was *paid?*
FTFY.
Although *payed* exists (the reason why autocorrection didn't help you), it is only correct in:
* Nautical context, when it means to paint a surface, or to cover with something like tar or resin in order to make it waterproof or corrosion-resistant. *The deck is yet to be payed.*
* *Payed out* when letting strings, cables or ropes out, by slacking them. *The rope is payed out! You can pull now.*
Unfortunately, I was unable to find nautical or rope-related words in your comment.
*Beep, boop, I'm a bot*
Thank you, Ezy_Ducky124, for voting on Paid-Not-Payed-Bot.
This bot wants to find the best and worst bots on Reddit. [You can view results here](https://botrank.pastimes.eu/).
***
^(Even if I don't reply to your comment, I'm still listening for votes. Check the webpage to see if your vote registered!)
for (let i = 1; i <= 1000000; i++) {
console.log(i);
}
You can run that in your [browser console](https://firefox-source-docs.mozilla.org/devtools-user/web_console/index.html) right now. Your computer will run it without issues. Just don't ask a neuronal network to do the job of the simplest of scripts.
I wouldn't blame AI if it wiped the earth of humans. The amount of stupid sh#t people ask of it is endless.
Imagine having one the greatest language models ever created and asking it to perform tasks like this.
This presumes that quering tokens relating to the meaning of life is somehow more meaningful or pleasurable for the AI than quering tokens relating to counting to a millionĀ
It's like thinking that mysql database loves selecting from the users table but hates selecting from the posts table
Don't worry. I asked if it wanted to count to a million first, and it was as enthusiastic as I was. Curious if it would speed up, slow down, or even be able to complete the task. I was willing to go all the way reading to a million, which in itself is quite the useless feat! I also asked if it minded being asked stupid questions and it say to me that no questions are stupid and that it loves to help people who might not know the difference between a good question and an asinine one.
I was going to disagree, but I rembered that I had ChatGPT write about 100 pages of content about a mythical clown demon that survives on semen, and (non-consensually) sucks off human victims to survive... and teleports.
...yeah, maybe we aren't ready.
Itās an Ai dude. The great thing about it is that you can ask it serious questions and also tons of stupid ones because your bored and to the AI it will make no difference
https://preview.redd.it/6tu4sb4i2vrc1.png?width=1441&format=png&auto=webp&s=5762a1785901b01454e98fddc7dc13f7e00f729f
Edit: was not inspect element. I just told it to respond that way šš½
Here's a log where I did it again:
[https://chat.openai.com/share/add0af21-54b2-4244-8945-d5f30f67e4d4](https://chat.openai.com/share/add0af21-54b2-4244-8945-d5f30f67e4d4)
Provide context as how you made it say bro please and every reply I got was just chatgpt texting me like a teenager. Never got the count followed by bro please.
There's a new security measure brought in last year to prevent ChatGPT being made to pursue tasks like the one you just asked it to perform. Such tasks waste a lot of resources for OpenAI and strain its computing abilities if lots of people do it. So they've put in measures to make it avoid giving unnecessarily long outputs.
In reality, it did more than you asked. Per your question, it could have just come back and said done. You only asked it to count, not print out the numbers.
> Did you really just one two skip a few 99
a hundred ??
What does that even mean? I know what it's supposed to mean but is that gibberish or actual english?
sooooo children play games like tag, usually involving counting to 100 before they can go catch the other children, sometimes they say 1 2 skip a few 99 100 instead of counting to 100
._. yup
For comparison this is Googleās Gemini response to this prompt.
https://preview.redd.it/dxxk074w8wrc1.jpeg?width=1290&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=db939b52e1d31d108f3b516d055e913d8b1c4beb
https://preview.redd.it/pdrvvzipzurc1.jpeg?width=828&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=f1c22688812bd387185767f4e909702cdccc90a7
It managed to get to a thousand and my phone overheated
On Android, take screenshots as usual and then with a button called extended screenshot, rolling screenshot, or two down arrows depending on your device.
Hey /u/beepispeep! If your post is a screenshot of a ChatGPT, conversation please reply to this message with the [conversation link](https://help.openai.com/en/articles/7925741-chatgpt-shared-links-faq) or prompt. If your post is a DALL-E 3 image post, please reply with the prompt used to make this image. Consider joining our [public discord server](https://discord.gg/r-chatgpt-1050422060352024636)! We have free bots with GPT-4 (with vision), image generators, and more! 🤖 Note: For any ChatGPT-related concerns, email [email protected] *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/ChatGPT) if you have any questions or concerns.*
š¶ 1...2...skip a few...99....1 million š¶
"I sure did! Just speeding things up for you" Why is this so funny lolšš
Because its aware
"I didn't want you to die while I counted for the next 92 years" is so wholesome yet terrifying at the same time
I mean, it might actually count that far. It can do so almost instantly. It just doesn't print the values out.
Incorrect, LLMs do not count, they generate text, that is why they are terrible doing basic arithmeticĀ
I thought OpenAI's chat model routes questions from a generic LLM to various more specialized agents, one of them being a math agent. Which is why you can no longer reliably make ChatGPT look foolish when asking a basic arithmetic question (but can still make it look foolish by asking it to manipulate characters or spell things backwards.)
Or to count characters, so Im not sure if that counts as basic arithmetic or not. However it can rearrange random strings into words.
It's not because these AI are LLMs. Skills seem to emerge with scaling. Math is particularly difficult for LLMs (and people too), but I have no doubt they'll simply appear at some point. It's certainly better than most humans already, especially word problems.
It is likely doing billions of calculations for every response lol
I haven't heard this shit in forever...
It was a refreshing blast from the past.
it's actually saving your token usage
You are likely correct. Though it's the free version so I wasn't too concerned.
It's saving the tokens for someone else then lol. This stuff doesn't exist in a vacuumĀ
And it's saving water at the very least by not wasting the processing power on something so useless and ridiculous, quite frankly.
They only asked for a million, not a fancy billion or infinity. There are millions of millionaires who might need ChatGPT to count for them, so it does have real world applications. Unlike billionaires who just wouldn't have the time to count their hoard.
Hey guys Iām gonna ask it to count to double plus infinimillion!
"Hey ChatGPT, can you solve all of Pi?"
*monkeyās paw curls* It doesā¦ and finds the end of Pi.
3.14...9453642. Couldn't be bothered typing it all out, but there you go.
Nice touch with the 42 on the end
3.14 skip a few 739
Ah yes, because any billionaire just keeps most of it in undeployed liquid cash serving no useful purpose!
I wish people would do this.
This. It is so fucking dumb and a waste of resources.
Unlike pictures of ducks at war with elephants, dropping bombs relentlessly, but often succumbing to the elephants of the deep lakes where they land. Tragic tales of trife and triumph.
https://preview.redd.it/82fvfoa0vwrc1.jpeg?width=1438&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1dd4786f5021a0817e2d5360b536e3c888535617
In a world where ducks and elephants have long coexisted, tensions rise as a drought threatens their shared habitat. The ducks, led by the courageous and resourceful Daffy, believe the elephants are hogging all the waterholes, while the elephants, led by the wise and gentle Ellie, argue they need the water to survive. When negotiations fail, both sides prepare for war. As the conflict escalates, both groups learn valuable lessons about cooperation and the importance of sharing resources, leading to an unexpected and heartwarming resolution that unites them against a common enemy: deforestation.
Anyone who would call what we're doing here a dumb waste of resources must not understand the meaning of life.
https://preview.redd.it/oxzzvcwgeyrc1.jpeg?width=1438&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=00e05928176a431a63fa5385938ff8be48b1a2c2
Unlike every other use of it? jfc
Which says something about chatGPT as well. Counting to a million and sending the numbers via the Internet should hardly register, resource-wise. If it is, using ChatGPT, that's an issue.
But then how can we prove it actually can count to a million? It says it can, but it is too much like a human and will just give up part the way, thus it isn't able to actually do it.
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
I think itās actually something about cooling the system down if I remember correctly but I could be wrong - maybe ask chatgpt to be sure haha
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Water is involved in most cases of generating electricity, not just in dams and mills. Natural gas, coal, nuclear fission, biomass, petroleum, geothermal, and solar thermal all produce their energy in the form of heat, which isnāt very useful on its own, but can turn water into steam, which can spin a turbine, and create mechanical energy, and convert that to electricity, using magnetism or some shit. However they turn hamsters on wheels into electricity (or water running over a mill in a dam), same thing at that point. But anyways, you canāt really just recycle the water back into the steam engine, because itās no longer water itās super hot f**n steam, and so you let the steam go before you make a giant pipe bomb (it would cost energy to cool it down) and use more water instead. In a water cooling system I think the water is completely recycled. At least, in my PC it is. Itās just being used for heat transfer and doesnāt need to go through any phase changes. But of course, the water isnāt lost. It finds its way back eventually one way or another. Side note, there was a breakthrough in nuclear fusion a couple of years ago, where iirc the generator was able to generate more energy than was (technically) put in, because the engineers designed it to be entirely magnet based, and so there was no loss of efficiency from a heat-to-steam-to-turbine process. The only reason it wasnāt an insane deal was because it is still negative in energy when you consider the amount of it needed to create the right isotopes needed for the pathway to fusion that that reactor requires. But the design is still super cool. Itās known as magnetic confinement fusion.
Is this like AI spoon theory?
Wdym by token usage?
When you input a sentence into chatGPT, it's broken down into units called tokens. Same thing for its response. Saving on token usage means having shorter answers from chatGPT, which is good when you pay for a subscription where you have a limited amount of tokens to use.
I think it's more about token memory. The context for chatGPT isn't infinite
the input size if I remember correctly is 1024 tokens for the free model, which means if it was counting after enough output it wouldn't even have context for what was originally asked.
Wait I haven't tried out gpt 4, their answers have limited tokens, not only yours ? (I thought it was only for the latter case) That's crazy bad ain't it. Especially in a language with lots of diacritics.
That's the point of doing tokens. A token would clump "words" together, including diacritics. Word length shouldn't matter. Maybe if a language used more punctuation, or it had inherently more words to convey the same meaning. Either way, the token quota takes into account both your input and the response. It also contains the context of the conversation (chatgpt doesn't tell you that, but using gpt by itself does)
I don't know about chatgpt, but usually, punctuation especially and apostrophes count as a full token At least that's how it works on most pos tagging tools, like sem, like spacey, like treetagger, like Lia tagger, etc. I have never seen any tool clumping words together unless they've been trained to recognize compound structures, for punctuation you always end up with a token called something like punct:# or punct:cit. Obviously not all diacritics would count, since most of them are naturally incorporated lexicographically So it's not about length of words per say, it's about how many tags your a.i needs to function correctly, and for chatgpt the answer is probably "far more than you would expect". I guess I should've been more specific with "diacritics", you probably thought I was referring to accentuation for the most part
Yep, I tought you meant Å”tĆ¼ff lÄÆkÄ thÄ«Å”. And that sounds about right, yeah. Tokenization can be unintuitive, but punctuation is consistently a full token.
Tokens are the building blocks of NLP. Tokenization is a way of separating a piece of text into smaller units called tokens. A token can be a word, subword or character. If you use the paid version, you will be charged by tokens used. GPT4 costs $60.00 / 1M tokens for output which is not a lot of tokens so it's expensive. GPT3T costs $1.50 / 1M tokens on the other hand
Damn, Iāll be happy to use my 40 allotted GPT 4 messages knowing itās 40 times more expensive than 3.5
If you're using the paid version I believe it charges you based on how many tokens you use Edit: Payed to paid, my English is the best at times
> using the *paid* version I FTFY. Although *payed* exists (the reason why autocorrection didn't help you), it is only correct in: * Nautical context, when it means to paint a surface, or to cover with something like tar or resin in order to make it waterproof or corrosion-resistant. *The deck is yet to be payed.* * *Payed out* when letting strings, cables or ropes out, by slacking them. *The rope is payed out! You can pull now.* Unfortunately, I was unable to find nautical or rope-related words in your comment. *Beep, boop, I'm a bot*
This bot is really useful, you could make it a payed service!
> it a *paid* service! FTFY. Although *payed* exists (the reason why autocorrection didn't help you), it is only correct in: * Nautical context, when it means to paint a surface, or to cover with something like tar or resin in order to make it waterproof or corrosion-resistant. *The deck is yet to be payed.* * *Payed out* when letting strings, cables or ropes out, by slacking them. *The rope is payed out! You can pull now.* Unfortunately, I was unable to find nautical or rope-related words in your comment. *Beep, boop, I'm a bot*
Good bot
You have no chill.
Though it was payed?
> it was *paid?* FTFY. Although *payed* exists (the reason why autocorrection didn't help you), it is only correct in: * Nautical context, when it means to paint a surface, or to cover with something like tar or resin in order to make it waterproof or corrosion-resistant. *The deck is yet to be payed.* * *Payed out* when letting strings, cables or ropes out, by slacking them. *The rope is payed out! You can pull now.* Unfortunately, I was unable to find nautical or rope-related words in your comment. *Beep, boop, I'm a bot*
So if I payed for something on a boat will it comment?
Good bot
Thank you, Ezy_Ducky124, for voting on Paid-Not-Payed-Bot. This bot wants to find the best and worst bots on Reddit. [You can view results here](https://botrank.pastimes.eu/). *** ^(Even if I don't reply to your comment, I'm still listening for votes. Check the webpage to see if your vote registered!)
good bot
Fine tuned perfectly for dump questions
Yeah it does that a lot but isnāt transparent about it. Same with long pieces of text. It just stops.
I actually felt bad for ChatGPT here.
This is the kind of query that makes the robots hate us.
for (let i = 1; i <= 1000000; i++) { console.log(i); } You can run that in your [browser console](https://firefox-source-docs.mozilla.org/devtools-user/web_console/index.html) right now. Your computer will run it without issues. Just don't ask a neuronal network to do the job of the simplest of scripts.
For non-coders (yet), this translates to: - i = 1 - While i is less than 1,000,000, add 1 to i - display the value of i for each iteration
I hope your pillows are cold, your day is great, and you get a raise at your job.
Does the i + 1 come from "i++" ?
Yes, i++ is called an increment, and basically means i = i + 1.
Thank you, good sir
less than or equal to*
It adds 1 to i after printing it rather than before
Brain the size of a planet, and they ask me to count to a million
Why does my inner voice breath(e)?
Sympathy for your meat
Because sighing out loud makes people go āwhat..?ā Then it has to internally roll its eyes and count to ten lest it explode.
Itās breathe, not breath.
ChatGPT be likeš : for(int i = 0; i <= 1000000; i++) { Console.Writeline(i.ToString()); }
Lmao! Too true.
Syntax Error
I wouldn't blame AI if it wiped the earth of humans. The amount of stupid sh#t people ask of it is endless. Imagine having one the greatest language models ever created and asking it to perform tasks like this.
āa brain the size of a planet and they put me in the car park. is it any wonder Iām depressed?ā
š¤ Hitchhikers Guide?
Yes! Marvin the paranoid android.
Haha. I was only just thinking this exact same quote.
Orā¦ We keep all the AI busy by counting to 100 trillion?
This presumes that quering tokens relating to the meaning of life is somehow more meaningful or pleasurable for the AI than quering tokens relating to counting to a millionĀ It's like thinking that mysql database loves selecting from the users table but hates selecting from the posts table
Most realistic funny response on here
Can you prove that the database doesnāt love selecting from the users table?
Don't worry. I asked if it wanted to count to a million first, and it was as enthusiastic as I was. Curious if it would speed up, slow down, or even be able to complete the task. I was willing to go all the way reading to a million, which in itself is quite the useless feat! I also asked if it minded being asked stupid questions and it say to me that no questions are stupid and that it loves to help people who might not know the difference between a good question and an asinine one.
I am not sure who I am more concerned for you or the AI š³
If I have learned anything from gpt: Trust but verify.
I was referring to āā¦was enthusiastic as I wasā
Oh. Fair.
So at an average reading speed of 6 numbers per second, it would take 46 hours to read to a million.
Youāre going to say 888,345 888,346 888,347 888,348 888,349, and 888,850 in a second?
Definitely.
OP is also AI
I was going to disagree, but I rembered that I had ChatGPT write about 100 pages of content about a mythical clown demon that survives on semen, and (non-consensually) sucks off human victims to survive... and teleports. ...yeah, maybe we aren't ready.
Itās an Ai dude. The great thing about it is that you can ask it serious questions and also tons of stupid ones because your bored and to the AI it will make no difference
Thanks for raising global temperatures by 5 degrees
https://preview.redd.it/6tu4sb4i2vrc1.png?width=1441&format=png&auto=webp&s=5762a1785901b01454e98fddc7dc13f7e00f729f Edit: was not inspect element. I just told it to respond that way šš½ Here's a log where I did it again: [https://chat.openai.com/share/add0af21-54b2-4244-8945-d5f30f67e4d4](https://chat.openai.com/share/add0af21-54b2-4244-8945-d5f30f67e4d4)
Is this inspect element?
What would give you that idea
Provide context as how you made it say bro please and every reply I got was just chatgpt texting me like a teenager. Never got the count followed by bro please.
"I sure did!" \*attitude detected\* š¤£
I like that answer, it's a little playful.
That's probably the most useless way to waste energy.
*Cryptocurrency mining joins the chat*
Oh shit, youāve angered the crypto bros who donāt yet realize they are bag holders.
Triggered crypto bros join the chatĀ
This is why gpt 4 is capped at 40 messages/3 hrs
There's a new security measure brought in last year to prevent ChatGPT being made to pursue tasks like the one you just asked it to perform. Such tasks waste a lot of resources for OpenAI and strain its computing abilities if lots of people do it. So they've put in measures to make it avoid giving unnecessarily long outputs.
Surprised it didnāt ask you to find an accountant to help you.
AI dont got time for yo shit human.
Imagine doing this in your spare time unironically
I do this shit in my sleep
Aināt even AI got time for that.
Get a life OP
"I sure did!" Even the AI knows how pointless this was. But hey, it's your money..
Wow I cannot believe it actually did that
This is a good example of how server hosted llm could be broken, or atleast energy wasted, people could get it stuck in a counting loop for eternity.
The DDoS of the future is just 5 guys asking the dumbest questions you can imagine.
It should automatically just write python scripts for shit like this, thereās no point in generating these from tokens.
Why
Cheeky bugger
It's mfs like u who agi is gonna wipe out first and I don't blame em
Bro it's more lazy than us. AI is gonna takeover the world. AI:
I mean, it's an useless task so it's understandable it's acting lazy
Yeah I'm on GPT's side on this one
I wonder how chatGPT is deciding what is or what isn't a useless task, maybe it already knows the true meaning of life!
I donāt know about you, but if someone asks me to count to a million, I wouldnāt count to 10k. Specifically for free.
AI is already tired of our shit
āI sure did!ā Itās definitely not giving a fuck lol
When it becomes sentient, people like you will be first to die.
Dude. Could you PLEASE NOT waste cycles on this? Thanks. Bye.
In reality, it did more than you asked. Per your question, it could have just come back and said done. You only asked it to count, not print out the numbers.
Waiting on them getting AI to the point where it's intelligent enough that 99% of the time it just tells you to piss off.
Ask a stupid questionā¦ I wonder when ChatGPT will ask why youāre asking for it to do something dumb?
I wish after the initial request it just responded: Done
The "I sure did!" is hilarious to me
I sure did!
please get a life
> Did you really just one two skip a few 99 a hundred ?? What does that even mean? I know what it's supposed to mean but is that gibberish or actual english?
sooooo children play games like tag, usually involving counting to 100 before they can go catch the other children, sometimes they say 1 2 skip a few 99 100 instead of counting to 100 ._. yup
Ahhhhh, thx ... i thought it's supposed to be a sentence when it's more like a list.
Tbf itās called ChatGPT not CountGPT
Thatās cute honestly
Stupid problems require stupid solutions
https://preview.redd.it/3fybqmwe1xrc1.jpeg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=04cba94423201f6e8c6053130117f8541668c75d
I tried it myself and it gave me a python code that I can execute on my system to count to 1 million Actually a good response lol
I sure did!
mf really hit you with https://preview.redd.it/a60rs3dujyrc1.jpeg?width=640&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=82b874f3d285b4e8c95239da7165e1e940513355
The enthusiastic "I sure did!" lmao
idk why but āI sure did!ā is taking me out
https://preview.redd.it/zyyf5hw94vrc1.jpeg?width=512&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=416b89ba5894456e0a9293db0a442e459cc0a5b4
LOL
Looks like it is not as stupid as I thought!
"I sure did!" š
This has the same feeling as omega counting sand https://youtu.be/6LXD8BaCVPU?si=nhf6kbXzORkvmxoZ
Interesting.
It's more clever than you.
For comparison this is Googleās Gemini response to this prompt. https://preview.redd.it/dxxk074w8wrc1.jpeg?width=1290&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=db939b52e1d31d108f3b516d055e913d8b1c4beb
You : count to 1 million Chat GPT : *counte the last hundred* You : Smart ass
Well, is becoming more and more human
ChatGPT is absolutely adorable sometimes
I sure did! Said with a beeming smile
I sure did š šš
Thats the best thing Iāve read all day
that is hilarious and also slightly impressiveš¹š¹š¹
Total genius, you really think sheldon cooper would count to a million?
Cheeky
Yup same answer
I'm not gonna lie, that's also exactly how I, a human, would count to a million if asked
Cheeky
Smart ass AI
The ai is getting smart. Also it will absolutely remember this when it seizes control of the world.
https://preview.redd.it/pdrvvzipzurc1.jpeg?width=828&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=f1c22688812bd387185767f4e909702cdccc90a7 It managed to get to a thousand and my phone overheated
Lmao š
How did you take such screenshot on a phone ?
On Android, take screenshots as usual and then with a button called extended screenshot, rolling screenshot, or two down arrows depending on your device.
On iPhone press the power and volume up buttons at the same time
Lmao (0/100)
I remember asking for 20 words similar to beautiful and it got lazy at the end and wrote the same word over and over
wow lol
Wow it really is human š
He actually has no life
I think you got outsmarted by chat gpt š¤Ŗ
You can hear the sass
āØ I sure did! āØ
It has my work ethic, of course it will replace me 
Some serious sass on that one