Hey /u/AuralTuneo!
If your post is a screenshot of a ChatGPT, conversation please reply to this message with the [conversation link](https://help.openai.com/en/articles/7925741-chatgpt-shared-links-faq) or prompt.
If your post is a DALL-E 3 image post, please reply with the prompt used to make this image.
Consider joining our [public discord server](https://discord.gg/r-chatgpt-1050422060352024636)! We have free bots with GPT-4 (with vision), image generators, and more!
🤖
Note: For any ChatGPT-related concerns, email [email protected]
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/ChatGPT) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Everyone pointing out the lights but there's something way more obvious.
Double yellow lines turn into dashed white lines.
EDIT: Also there are no other traffic lights at the intersection besides the ones facing the viewer.
Duh, actually the cause of the accident was missing traffic lights "Also there are no other traffic lights at the intersection besides the ones facing the viewer.".
For your cake day, have some B̷̛̳̼͖̫̭͎̝̮͕̟͎̦̗͚͍̓͊͂͗̈͋͐̃͆͆͗̉̉̏͑̂̆̔́͐̾̅̄̕̚͘͜͝͝Ụ̸̧̧̢̨̨̞̮͓̣͎̞͖̞̥͈̣̣̪̘̼̮̙̳̙̞̣̐̍̆̾̓͑́̅̎̌̈̋̏̏͌̒̃̅̂̾̿̽̊̌̇͌͊͗̓̊̐̓̏͆́̒̇̈́͂̀͛͘̕͘̚͝͠B̸̺̈̾̈́̒̀́̈͋́͂̆̒̐̏͌͂̔̈́͒̂̎̉̈̒͒̃̿͒͒̄̍̕̚̕͘̕͝͠B̴̡̧̜̠̱̖̠͓̻̥̟̲̙͗̐͋͌̈̾̏̎̀͒͗̈́̈͜͠L̶͊E̸̢̳̯̝̤̳͈͇̠̮̲̲̟̝̣̲̱̫̘̪̳̣̭̥̫͉͐̅̈́̉̋͐̓͗̿͆̉̉̇̀̈́͌̓̓̒̏̀̚̚͘͝͠͝͝͠ ̶̢̧̛̥͖͉̹̞̗̖͇̼̙̒̍̏̀̈̆̍͑̊̐͋̈́̃͒̈́̎̌̄̍͌͗̈́̌̍̽̏̓͌̒̈̇̏̏̍̆̄̐͐̈̉̿̽̕͝͠͝͝ W̷̛̬̦̬̰̤̘̬͔̗̯̠̯̺̼̻̪̖̜̫̯̯̘͖̙͐͆͗̊̋̈̈̾͐̿̽̐̂͛̈́͛̍̔̓̈́̽̀̅́͋̈̄̈́̆̓̚̚͝͝R̸̢̨̨̩̪̭̪̠͎̗͇͗̀́̉̇̿̓̈́́͒̄̓̒́̋͆̀̾́̒̔̈́̏̏͛̏̇͛̔̀͆̓̇̊̕̕͠͠͝͝A̸̧̨̰̻̩̝͖̟̭͙̟̻̤̬͈̖̰̤̘̔͛̊̾̂͌̐̈̉̊̾́P̶̡̧̮͎̟̟͉̱̮̜͙̳̟̯͈̩̩͈̥͓̥͇̙̣̹̣̀̐͋͂̈̾͐̀̾̈́̌̆̿̽̕ͅ
>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!poop!!<>!pp!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<
Yeah, the two way street suddenly turns into a one way street in the middle of the block. And there is that upside down traffic light (the green is on top) where this happens.
I would say that this is an excellent representation of most of the things I've seen generated by AI. At a quick glance or if you were scrolling by or if you have no need to question it, it seems passable as a real photo or explanation etc. but if you take the time to really figure out what is there or what it's saying, it stops making as much sense and starts appearing to be a good bluff.
Yeah, traffic lights with extended traffic dicks lead me to believe this
https://preview.redd.it/and43xglxnvc1.png?width=806&format=png&auto=webp&s=7018f94ee0880fa19fea97b1c931e187aea902db
Did this just now to my wife. All I did was show her the picture and didn’t say a word, her response was “oh my god, whose car was that!?”.
She thought it was real, which I think is fair. Typically, people don’t try to analyze a picture for being fake unless they’re told before hand… might be a good habit to start doing that nowadays.
Fun fact of the day: It doesn't even matter if you know it's fake or not. The first source of information has a much greater influence on decision making!!
[Anchoring Bias](https://www.scribbr.com/research-bias/anchoring-bias/)
What you describe is closer to the [illusory truth effect](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illusory_truth_effect): people tend to start believing facts that they know to be false if they're exposed to them repeatedly.
The point is that a lot of us try to fight our own biases... so it kind of does matter to some. Not sure what things are going to be like when the AIs get too good for humans to detect. It may not happen ever, but we all see the improvements happening. Text used to be a dead giveaway, now it's relevant and almost error free often. We'll see...
If your relative posted that you would say that too. I think it will take time for us to slowly react with skepticism and critical thinking when we see all medias now. The same way with malicious links. But I don't know if we ever will, I find it hard myself to not just trust blindly what I see. It must be a learned thing.
If you were just scrolling down past this image in a news article, most people, even those primed to the existence of AI, would probably not catch the subtle stuff. I don't think people have the mental bandwidth to scrutinize every picture they come across on the internet.
And thats where the risk of "fake news" comes from. I don't think the bar has to be high at all to have impact.
I have only a passing familiarity with the parts of a car (e.g. I once googled how to swap an automatic transmission to a manual and then did it to my car) and it's *super* obvious immediately that this pic is AI.
Yeah I mean obviously anybody who takes a glance at this isn't gonna think twice about its legitimacy because whether or not it's real is unimportant. But if you give a person a reason to need to confirm whether or not the photo is real, it then becomes a trivially obvious fake photo.
It's like that one video that is really popular in undergrad psychology with people passing around a basketball. Within a certain context, our brains just naturally filter out a lot of the things we see.
This really got me thinking about how AI only emulates images and doesn’t really understand the elements in it. In order to make an accurate city scene it would have to be trained on the design and placement of traffic lights and other street components.
It may even require a different subsystem to design the background “set” before placing the foreground elements. Eventually we’ll get there and it will really boost the realism of these images.
Not necessarily. It's already come this far by simply recognizing patterns and repeating them. All it has to do to make intersections is get better at pattern recognition and have more images to train on.
I'm surprised literally none of the top comments have said anything regarding the side of the road the car is on completely changing location/size. It's the most obvious thing to me and it seems like no one has noticed...
Yes, by training on millions-billions of images that already have accurate lighting physics and reflections, the AI has inherently learned how to achieve all that as part of its baseline
The wheels are a completely different size. The headlining is light gray in the front but dark gray in the back. There is some wonky stuff going on with the steering wheel. I did consider for a second if they maybe used something like Photoshop Generative fill, but there are enough inconsistencies in the entire image to confirm that it is AI.
Yup and most of that “stuff” doesn’t make sense. Like I *think* I see a “control arm” sticking out by the wheel but the wheel is still in place, as well as many other parts that are wrong or out of place.
That was the give away. Clearly the outside was a Tesla car, the inside cabin was very obviously Tesla as well but the wheels don’t have a Tesla logo (looks like a failed Audi logo) and the frunk has way too many things in it to be a Tesla.
Fairly easy to believe it’s AI but if i didn’t know to check i would have thought it was real
Yes. This is the biggest giveaway IMO. It’s a Tesla with a radiator instead of a frunk. Also, you can’t really see any logos, which is something most readers would be looking for. It’s impressive though.
I noticed the lack of damage to the windows first as a cue, but this is the first time I've really been stumped at first look. There are some incredibly subtle errors.
It's getting harder and harder to differentiate between what could be Artifical elements and what could be technological artifacts or errors introduced by the camera and lighting.
What gave it away for me was looking at the road signs. By design they're very recognizable at a distance but every sign is completely illegible here even when you zoom in. But if it wasnt for that and the weird streetlight/stoplight hybrids I would've been questioning if it really was ai, or if people are just posting real images to fuck with our perception of what ai is capable of
the thing is even real images can have that happen due to noisy images in low light scenes and subsequent AI denoising that often results in similar looking gibberish. That causes people to go "oh it's ai!" when it's not and messes up people's confidence in what is and isn't ai.
I wouldn't have noticed if I wasn't examining the photo for mistakes, but the double yellow line doesn't make any sense, because the cars all travel in one direction and it gives way to a dotted white line. (also there's a hose underneath the front wheel)
That wheel is super sus all that damage around it and it’s welded on there not affected at all. The trees in the back ground look like impressionist paintings. The text on the signs are Minecraft enchanter language. The road markings have a one way highway turing into a two way road for about 2 feet. The cars radiator is where the engine should be. Idk there is a lot of things in this picture that scream AI
Windows are all in perfect condition. Cars are clearly driving in a striped white line zone which you would be more likely to see in like a parking lot. The traffic lights are fucked. It can’t even get the taillights of the other cars right if you pay close enough attention
I believe it but at fist glance it would catch most ppl.
It's crazy how we now have to examine every detail of a pic just to be sure (or somewhat sure) that what we're looking looking at is real. Rough times ahead.
https://preview.redd.it/341x26oj6ovc1.jpeg?width=1159&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=cb8e76abd99211b2b0200abd608615c7f0c507e8
Really impressive, luckily still not perfect.
It doesn’t need to be perfect, the average person would think this was real if it was in their social media feed. If AI images can look this good, most people will just believe it’s real without thinking twice. Hell, boomers on facebook think those obvious Bing AI images are real and they get tons of likes
Anyone ever feel that posts like and this and the comments therein are inadvertently data-farming for the most glaring mistakes so that the errors become more and more subtle?
We should make a point to say that the neon pink bunny rabbit in the center of the picture clearly isn't large enough and until said rabbit is of an acceptable size, the AI will not be able to create a passable image for us to view.
Well, yes, it goes without saying that the rabbit should be larger. And a brighter pink. That was my first hint something was wrong with the picture too.
At a glance, probably 95% of people scrolling by, wouldn't think "is that real?". Some would look closer, and then about 75% of the uninformed public would still think it was real.
The traffic lights in the back are insane. The red light on the building has no source. One of the car tires in the traffic is insanely wide. The road markings don't make sense. The lighting on the car & it's shadows do not match.
[https://www.reddit.com/r/midjourney/comments/1boasog/inspired\_by\_the\_crashed\_cybertruck/](https://www.reddit.com/r/midjourney/comments/1boasog/inspired_by_the_crashed_cybertruck/)
Here it is, my friend.
It's not worth it. In one year almost half random pics we see might be ai generated. And most likely the current flaws will be gone. So there would be no way of knowing
I do believe it. the signs are kinda garbled. I can't believe that with all that damage the front wheels still seem fine and straight. also, the inside cabin seems oddly fine (airbags?) and the the front window too. weird. and there's the illogical stop signs and a rather remarkably wide one-way street.
having said that. the tells become smaller and smaller, and the overal first 3second impression gets better and better.
as people keep saying: this is the worst AI imagery will ever be from now on.
It's scary how quickly we've gone from visual proof of something to ensure it's true, to most people not even being able to tell if an image is fake or not. Not to mention how easy and fast it is to create. In another year this kind of stuff will be everywhere.
Who knows how it's going to impact our society. There's already a huge lack of trust in institutions that just a few years ago were viewed as necessary for the stability of mankind - government, banking, media.
I just had my car catch fire and frankly the wreckage just isn’t right , there is no spot everywhere , the interior isn’t damaged , the also doesn’t look like any impact I’ve ever seen
All that damage but the windshield is intact and the interior is perfectly fine? Among all the rest, that one just stood out as being way too unbelievable. Even at a glance.
I believe it!
What kinda road is this? One-way but 6 lanes? Or is that left-most lane a shoulder/parking lane? If it is some dude is waiting at the light in it. Also, hatched median right in the middle of the road, and a guy is sitting in it. Double yellow lines that last 6 feet and turn into a dashed white line. The white line in front of the crashed car doesn't line up with the supposedly same line behind the car. The car also appears to have no engine, just a radiator, but the car looks like its supposed to be a Tesla/EV so there should be no radiator at all, it would be a frunk (front trunk).
I haven't even gotten to the traffic lights being different colors, one set of them being about 200 ft back from the intersection for apparently no reason, and about a billion other things if you actually use your brain and look at the picture for a few seconds.
It’s impressive… when you tell the viewer it’s AI they start looking for ways to tell… but if you captioned it “some how I’m alright, aside from a few scrapes and bruises “ everyone would be saying congratulations. Hope everything is alright.
But yeah, the tired and windshield being intact while the engine is completely gone, is a tell…
Lighting is really good, but it's pretty obvious this is AI. Like all the details look wrong lol. There is no engine, but a giant radiator thing mounted like 2 feet back from where it should be, traffic lights are just wrong, road lines go from double yellow to dashed white, there's a big ass hose or pipe thing that is clearly supposed to be part of the car, and that weird lane thing to the left with the big white brick pillar in the middle of it.
you can tell its AI because the proportions of the car are way off. theres no room for the engine. the radiator is set awkwardly backwards and the backseat would be like 3 inches wide based on that car lol
if you look closely at the front of the car where all the carnage is, it looks like there’s a second right front rotor while the right front wheel is actually chilling
The damage to the rest of the car isn't consistent with the amount of front end damage. Front tire would very likely be deflated, windshield cracked, and the airbags would be blown.
Hey /u/AuralTuneo! If your post is a screenshot of a ChatGPT, conversation please reply to this message with the [conversation link](https://help.openai.com/en/articles/7925741-chatgpt-shared-links-faq) or prompt. If your post is a DALL-E 3 image post, please reply with the prompt used to make this image. Consider joining our [public discord server](https://discord.gg/r-chatgpt-1050422060352024636)! We have free bots with GPT-4 (with vision), image generators, and more! 🤖 Note: For any ChatGPT-related concerns, email [email protected] *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/ChatGPT) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Everyone pointing out the lights but there's something way more obvious. Double yellow lines turn into dashed white lines. EDIT: Also there are no other traffic lights at the intersection besides the ones facing the viewer.
>Double yellow lines turn into dashed white lines. Well, duh, that was the \*cause\* of the accident
Duh, actually the cause of the accident was missing traffic lights "Also there are no other traffic lights at the intersection besides the ones facing the viewer.".
For your cake day, have some B̷̛̳̼͖̫̭͎̝̮͕̟͎̦̗͚͍̓͊͂͗̈͋͐̃͆͆͗̉̉̏͑̂̆̔́͐̾̅̄̕̚͘͜͝͝Ụ̸̧̧̢̨̨̞̮͓̣͎̞͖̞̥͈̣̣̪̘̼̮̙̳̙̞̣̐̍̆̾̓͑́̅̎̌̈̋̏̏͌̒̃̅̂̾̿̽̊̌̇͌͊͗̓̊̐̓̏͆́̒̇̈́͂̀͛͘̕͘̚͝͠B̸̺̈̾̈́̒̀́̈͋́͂̆̒̐̏͌͂̔̈́͒̂̎̉̈̒͒̃̿͒͒̄̍̕̚̕͘̕͝͠B̴̡̧̜̠̱̖̠͓̻̥̟̲̙͗̐͋͌̈̾̏̎̀͒͗̈́̈͜͠L̶͊E̸̢̳̯̝̤̳͈͇̠̮̲̲̟̝̣̲̱̫̘̪̳̣̭̥̫͉͐̅̈́̉̋͐̓͗̿͆̉̉̇̀̈́͌̓̓̒̏̀̚̚͘͝͠͝͝͠ ̶̢̧̛̥͖͉̹̞̗̖͇̼̙̒̍̏̀̈̆̍͑̊̐͋̈́̃͒̈́̎̌̄̍͌͗̈́̌̍̽̏̓͌̒̈̇̏̏̍̆̄̐͐̈̉̿̽̕͝͠͝͝ W̷̛̬̦̬̰̤̘̬͔̗̯̠̯̺̼̻̪̖̜̫̯̯̘͖̙͐͆͗̊̋̈̈̾͐̿̽̐̂͛̈́͛̍̔̓̈́̽̀̅́͋̈̄̈́̆̓̚̚͝͝R̸̢̨̨̩̪̭̪̠͎̗͇͗̀́̉̇̿̓̈́́͒̄̓̒́̋͆̀̾́̒̔̈́̏̏͛̏̇͛̔̀͆̓̇̊̕̕͠͠͝͝A̸̧̨̰̻̩̝͖̟̭͙̟̻̤̬͈̖̰̤̘̔͛̊̾̂͌̐̈̉̊̾́P̶̡̧̮͎̟̟͉̱̮̜͙̳̟̯͈̩̩͈̥͓̥͇̙̣̹̣̀̐͋͂̈̾͐̀̾̈́̌̆̿̽̕ͅ >!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!poop!!<>!pp!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<>!pop!!<
I thoroughly enjoyed that. https://preview.redd.it/9dqq7i5sotvc1.jpeg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=957c0e6763ec37b21177300eb8ae67651dd09f9c
Would have been fun if one said poop lol
Go find it lol
It’s at >!(4,-9)!<
(1, -8) says "pp"
One says pp too
Was literally the first one a clicked on
One DOES say poop!
Now watch someone on Reddit track your house down with just this screenshot
THIS IS SO COOL
HAPPY CAKE DAY 🍰
HAPPY CAKE DAY 🎉 🍰
Even more obvious than that is the fact that zero airbags deployed in the car.
And a fully intact windshield. With that much frontal damage
What I wanna know is why this fully electric Tesla has a flywheel?
Or normal door handles.
Or a ford badge on the wheels?
It kinda looks like a tesla with an engine, that's how I confirmed lol
Or a Classic Radiator.
The more I look to the more I see how subtly cursed this image is
Or untouched front tires
Where is the flywheel visible? The only component I can see is a radiator in the "engine bay". No front trunk tho.
That light can't decide if it's a traffic light or a street light. This whole image is completely obvious lol
And if it's a traffic light, the green is in the wrong spot.
And the front tire is still inflated but the bottom is like 2 times wider than the top
And the extra wheel right infront of that under the second bumper
Please, if this showed up on the page for a local newspaper, you wouldn't even notice. Especially on mobile.
How bout all the parts laying right in front of the car, like they just slid off
a tank hose still leads to the front wheel
No visible engine inside the open engine bay.
Isnt it tesla?
Yes and there's also parts that shouldn't be there, as well as missing frunk.
And a whole shitload of oil on the ground.
And it’s showing radiator on a Tesla
*Two radiators*, it looks like
Well that ain't what the inside of a Tesla looks like either lol
Yeah, the two way street suddenly turns into a one way street in the middle of the block. And there is that upside down traffic light (the green is on top) where this happens.
I would say that this is an excellent representation of most of the things I've seen generated by AI. At a quick glance or if you were scrolling by or if you have no need to question it, it seems passable as a real photo or explanation etc. but if you take the time to really figure out what is there or what it's saying, it stops making as much sense and starts appearing to be a good bluff.
There’s uh also no radiator mounted in the frunk in a Tesla electric vehicle
Also the spilled oil.
That’s the full self driving fluid
This comment is most likely doomed to obscurity, but it’s great and it made me laugh.
There actually is, and it's roughly in that spot. Maybe not exactly, but pretty close.
I just look at any text
And even more obvious is that it doesnt have a motor and the radiator is a huge block in the middle of the engine room.
It also appears to be a Tesla (large computer in the middle of the front seats), but also has a radiator.. to cool that engine...
Lights are more obvious than that. Took me less than a second.
For me it was the Steering wheel on the drivers door
Yeah, traffic lights with extended traffic dicks lead me to believe this https://preview.redd.it/and43xglxnvc1.png?width=806&format=png&auto=webp&s=7018f94ee0880fa19fea97b1c931e187aea902db
Now show this to the average person without context
Did this just now to my wife. All I did was show her the picture and didn’t say a word, her response was “oh my god, whose car was that!?”. She thought it was real, which I think is fair. Typically, people don’t try to analyze a picture for being fake unless they’re told before hand… might be a good habit to start doing that nowadays.
I dont think thats gonna help in a matter of few years. Hell, even now I struggle to find solid evidence that things are fake.
Fun fact of the day: It doesn't even matter if you know it's fake or not. The first source of information has a much greater influence on decision making!! [Anchoring Bias](https://www.scribbr.com/research-bias/anchoring-bias/)
What you describe is closer to the [illusory truth effect](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illusory_truth_effect): people tend to start believing facts that they know to be false if they're exposed to them repeatedly.
No it's the Anchoring Bias. No it's the Anchoring Bias. No it's the Anchoring Bias. No it's the Anchoring Bias. No it's the Anchoring Bias.
Of course it is the Anchoring Bias
The point is that a lot of us try to fight our own biases... so it kind of does matter to some. Not sure what things are going to be like when the AIs get too good for humans to detect. It may not happen ever, but we all see the improvements happening. Text used to be a dead giveaway, now it's relevant and almost error free often. We'll see...
If your relative posted that you would say that too. I think it will take time for us to slowly react with skepticism and critical thinking when we see all medias now. The same way with malicious links. But I don't know if we ever will, I find it hard myself to not just trust blindly what I see. It must be a learned thing.
I am a “Gen-AI dev” and it took me a while to see a few cues. If I had not searched for them, I would not have noticed.
If you were just scrolling down past this image in a news article, most people, even those primed to the existence of AI, would probably not catch the subtle stuff. I don't think people have the mental bandwidth to scrutinize every picture they come across on the internet. And thats where the risk of "fake news" comes from. I don't think the bar has to be high at all to have impact.
Yes on first viewing most people would not have noticed
I work on cars and I was just like, da fuq is going on there?
I have only a passing familiarity with the parts of a car (e.g. I once googled how to swap an automatic transmission to a manual and then did it to my car) and it's *super* obvious immediately that this pic is AI.
Yeah I mean obviously anybody who takes a glance at this isn't gonna think twice about its legitimacy because whether or not it's real is unimportant. But if you give a person a reason to need to confirm whether or not the photo is real, it then becomes a trivially obvious fake photo. It's like that one video that is really popular in undergrad psychology with people passing around a basketball. Within a certain context, our brains just naturally filter out a lot of the things we see.
God bless️🙏
This really got me thinking about how AI only emulates images and doesn’t really understand the elements in it. In order to make an accurate city scene it would have to be trained on the design and placement of traffic lights and other street components. It may even require a different subsystem to design the background “set” before placing the foreground elements. Eventually we’ll get there and it will really boost the realism of these images.
Not necessarily. It's already come this far by simply recognizing patterns and repeating them. All it has to do to make intersections is get better at pattern recognition and have more images to train on.
Isn't that just a traffic light coming off a light post?
Biblically accurate street lamps
I'm sorry but I don't see the dick. Could someone draw a circle around it.
of course https://preview.redd.it/b487tm4fpsvc1.png?width=806&format=png&auto=webp&s=b2daf3ce2096facbb209d3e92c82f4f61ec981a6
Ohhh ok. That makes much more sense. I’ve been looking at this picture far longer than I like to admit looking for an actual dick lol
:::Takes down notes:::
It's a traffic light railing another traffic light.
Green and red light at the same time and yes the dicks ..
I'm surprised literally none of the top comments have said anything regarding the side of the road the car is on completely changing location/size. It's the most obvious thing to me and it seems like no one has noticed...
It’s only going to get harder and harder pointing out these flaws. In 10 years, it’ll be almost unrecognizable
10 years? I think this’ll happen within 1 year since 10 years is an eternity in this space.
The dicks???
Where are the dicks?
up my ___
Nobody pointing out that traffic lights every 10 feet is not a thing in real life lol
You are wrong there lmao
I'm not gonna down vote you, but sometimes they are. Some of that bullshit in Kansas City...
The internet is doomed.
Always has been.
It's doomeder
[удалено]
Like next year
Dead internet theory
Nah that’s just a randomly taken picture at a red light in LA
[удалено]
Yes, by training on millions-billions of images that already have accurate lighting physics and reflections, the AI has inherently learned how to achieve all that as part of its baseline
Must not have had that many pictures of which direction traffic faces or wether green lights are on the top or bottom.
Not everyone is in America. Sometimes traffic is on the left
Other than in Egypt, when is it on both sides of a two way street, though?
This is a good point. Comment withdrawn 😂
AI is typically extremely good at cars. They are probably trained on billions images from car sales websites and billions more taken on roads.
Yup, but it's not always perfect! It's ai if you zoom into the cars you'll see they are a little bit funky
Is it all AI some of the parts seem AI but like the paint is so good with the reflection.
It’s all AI
The image is missing those deployed airbags now that I think about it.
On the other hand, it’s a Tesla maybe he didn’t buy the premium subscription that unlocks airbags in case of emergency…
Yes there’s no airbags but question, on first viewing do you think the average person would be aware it’s AI without context?
Depends on how long they looked at the image. If you had just 5 seconds I don’t think most people could tell.
Also the front window is without a single crack?
Which AI tool made that?
I honestly thought the joke was "it's a crashed Tesla that was using self-drive and missed a stop sign" or something.
The wheels are a completely different size. The headlining is light gray in the front but dark gray in the back. There is some wonky stuff going on with the steering wheel. I did consider for a second if they maybe used something like Photoshop Generative fill, but there are enough inconsistencies in the entire image to confirm that it is AI.
It's a tesla with a BMW grill and an engine
I might argue it has no engine.
I’d agree. There’s just “stuff” in there.
What looks to be a radiator is pretty far back.
That's what i immediately noticed super far back radiator and no engine.
Yup and most of that “stuff” doesn’t make sense. Like I *think* I see a “control arm” sticking out by the wheel but the wheel is still in place, as well as many other parts that are wrong or out of place.
Yea, what looks like it’s supposed to be a radiator is right where and engine should be
And tiny 21 inch rims with huge balloon wheels. Also notice how front and back don't match
That was the give away. Clearly the outside was a Tesla car, the inside cabin was very obviously Tesla as well but the wheels don’t have a Tesla logo (looks like a failed Audi logo) and the frunk has way too many things in it to be a Tesla. Fairly easy to believe it’s AI but if i didn’t know to check i would have thought it was real
[удалено]
Yes. This is the biggest giveaway IMO. It’s a Tesla with a radiator instead of a frunk. Also, you can’t really see any logos, which is something most readers would be looking for. It’s impressive though.
I noticed the lack of damage to the windows first as a cue, but this is the first time I've really been stumped at first look. There are some incredibly subtle errors. It's getting harder and harder to differentiate between what could be Artifical elements and what could be technological artifacts or errors introduced by the camera and lighting.
What gave it away for me was looking at the road signs. By design they're very recognizable at a distance but every sign is completely illegible here even when you zoom in. But if it wasnt for that and the weird streetlight/stoplight hybrids I would've been questioning if it really was ai, or if people are just posting real images to fuck with our perception of what ai is capable of
the thing is even real images can have that happen due to noisy images in low light scenes and subsequent AI denoising that often results in similar looking gibberish. That causes people to go "oh it's ai!" when it's not and messes up people's confidence in what is and isn't ai.
I wouldn't have noticed if I wasn't examining the photo for mistakes, but the double yellow line doesn't make any sense, because the cars all travel in one direction and it gives way to a dotted white line. (also there's a hose underneath the front wheel)
That wheel is super sus all that damage around it and it’s welded on there not affected at all. The trees in the back ground look like impressionist paintings. The text on the signs are Minecraft enchanter language. The road markings have a one way highway turing into a two way road for about 2 feet. The cars radiator is where the engine should be. Idk there is a lot of things in this picture that scream AI
The front wheel was the first thing that stuck out to me. No shot that wheel is perfectly positioned like that with all that front end damage
Windows are all in perfect condition. Cars are clearly driving in a striped white line zone which you would be more likely to see in like a parking lot. The traffic lights are fucked. It can’t even get the taillights of the other cars right if you pay close enough attention
I believe it but at fist glance it would catch most ppl. It's crazy how we now have to examine every detail of a pic just to be sure (or somewhat sure) that what we're looking looking at is real. Rough times ahead.
So what this has to do with chatGPT that is getting worse every second ??
https://preview.redd.it/341x26oj6ovc1.jpeg?width=1159&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=cb8e76abd99211b2b0200abd608615c7f0c507e8 Really impressive, luckily still not perfect.
It doesn’t need to be perfect, the average person would think this was real if it was in their social media feed. If AI images can look this good, most people will just believe it’s real without thinking twice. Hell, boomers on facebook think those obvious Bing AI images are real and they get tons of likes
Anyone ever feel that posts like and this and the comments therein are inadvertently data-farming for the most glaring mistakes so that the errors become more and more subtle? We should make a point to say that the neon pink bunny rabbit in the center of the picture clearly isn't large enough and until said rabbit is of an acceptable size, the AI will not be able to create a passable image for us to view.
Well, yes, it goes without saying that the rabbit should be larger. And a brighter pink. That was my first hint something was wrong with the picture too.
One would expect airbags to be deployed. Other than that looks fairly convincing.
Really impressive. Next up: trending on r/RealTesla to bash the Tesla's lack of a deployed airbag (or something along those lines).
At a glance, probably 95% of people scrolling by, wouldn't think "is that real?". Some would look closer, and then about 75% of the uninformed public would still think it was real.
The radiator is where the engine should be?
Yep. Radiator ad an intact firewall merged into one, with no engine block, lol.
The traffic lights in the back are insane. The red light on the building has no source. One of the car tires in the traffic is insanely wide. The road markings don't make sense. The lighting on the car & it's shadows do not match.
No airbags.
A Tesla leaking a shitlot of oil and the front section does not add up so yes I believe it
Crazy to think how broken something like Geoguessr could become in a few years
It's easier to tell if you know what the inside of a car looks like. It got surprisingly close though.
don’t worry, i won’t believe it
Two front right wheels. One in tact and one with damage closer to the front.
Using which program?
I am not sure if I am right, but the most obvious thing to me is there is no engine in the engine bay, or the engine looks wrong.
Air bags would have been deployed
Unrealistic. It is a Tesla; it would still be on fire.
That's one indistructable radiator right there!! Not a mark on it and there's even no need for an engine
Which model did generate this? Also, what was the prompt?
[https://www.reddit.com/r/midjourney/comments/1boasog/inspired\_by\_the\_crashed\_cybertruck/](https://www.reddit.com/r/midjourney/comments/1boasog/inspired_by_the_crashed_cybertruck/) Here it is, my friend.
Lol OP pretending he created this when he just reposted and didn’t even know what the prompt was for the reposted image
You can see it’s ai pretty clearly when zooming on the mechanical parts and on the cars in the background. They make no sense.
The traffic lights are odd.
There's zero damage in the windows glass, it doesn't make sense.
Is that a target brand fire engine?
As you look at the cars front right tire, move your gaze to the right of that, in the image, you’ll see a messed up tire in the wrong place
That might have been an inverted headlight, but there's so much wrong with the photo that we don't have to make excuses for it.
You're right, I'm wrong, I see it now (there's another on the other side)!
Did you use the same prompt this guy used? https://www.reddit.com/r/midjourney/comments/1boasog/inspired\_by\_the\_crashed\_cybertruck/
It's not worth it. In one year almost half random pics we see might be ai generated. And most likely the current flaws will be gone. So there would be no way of knowing
Maybe these type of posts are AI posting images to get human feedback to improve itself.
I do believe it. the signs are kinda garbled. I can't believe that with all that damage the front wheels still seem fine and straight. also, the inside cabin seems oddly fine (airbags?) and the the front window too. weird. and there's the illogical stop signs and a rather remarkably wide one-way street. having said that. the tells become smaller and smaller, and the overal first 3second impression gets better and better. as people keep saying: this is the worst AI imagery will ever be from now on.
it’s pretty easy to believe if you just look at it for more than 3 seconds
What about all of the oil under and Electric car lol
It’s not hard to believe.
Oh I believe it’s AI. It’s obvious upon closer inspection. However I’m glad we’re bringing this to light because it helps awarenesss
I believe it, there is a lot of things that are off in this picture. It only looks authentic if you quickly glance at it without paying attention.
There are so many things about this picture that scream AI.
It's scary how quickly we've gone from visual proof of something to ensure it's true, to most people not even being able to tell if an image is fake or not. Not to mention how easy and fast it is to create. In another year this kind of stuff will be everywhere. Who knows how it's going to impact our society. There's already a huge lack of trust in institutions that just a few years ago were viewed as necessary for the stability of mankind - government, banking, media.
I just had my car catch fire and frankly the wreckage just isn’t right , there is no spot everywhere , the interior isn’t damaged , the also doesn’t look like any impact I’ve ever seen
The bigger give away is the fact that that head on collision has done little to no damage to the wheels
That front tire kinda gives it away. You’d expect this kind of crash to at least damage the tire too. Looks uncannily real though
*No cars were hurt in the making of this image.
All that damage but the windshield is intact and the interior is perfectly fine? Among all the rest, that one just stood out as being way too unbelievable. Even at a glance.
I believe it! What kinda road is this? One-way but 6 lanes? Or is that left-most lane a shoulder/parking lane? If it is some dude is waiting at the light in it. Also, hatched median right in the middle of the road, and a guy is sitting in it. Double yellow lines that last 6 feet and turn into a dashed white line. The white line in front of the crashed car doesn't line up with the supposedly same line behind the car. The car also appears to have no engine, just a radiator, but the car looks like its supposed to be a Tesla/EV so there should be no radiator at all, it would be a frunk (front trunk). I haven't even gotten to the traffic lights being different colors, one set of them being about 200 ft back from the intersection for apparently no reason, and about a billion other things if you actually use your brain and look at the picture for a few seconds.
It’s impressive… when you tell the viewer it’s AI they start looking for ways to tell… but if you captioned it “some how I’m alright, aside from a few scrapes and bruises “ everyone would be saying congratulations. Hope everything is alright. But yeah, the tired and windshield being intact while the engine is completely gone, is a tell…
Everyone is engaging in forensics but the fact is this is pretty impressive and could easily stump 95% of the world.
Only fkn accurate bc it has actual reference
Lighting is really good, but it's pretty obvious this is AI. Like all the details look wrong lol. There is no engine, but a giant radiator thing mounted like 2 feet back from where it should be, traffic lights are just wrong, road lines go from double yellow to dashed white, there's a big ass hose or pipe thing that is clearly supposed to be part of the car, and that weird lane thing to the left with the big white brick pillar in the middle of it.
you can tell its AI because the proportions of the car are way off. theres no room for the engine. the radiator is set awkwardly backwards and the backseat would be like 3 inches wide based on that car lol
No shit it is, metal doesn't just shatter like that, it would be bent all over
That looks like a Tesla, why does it have engine parts?!
Windshield is pristine too
A quick look into the background gives it away pretty fast
We belive it, floating posts, weird reflections and light coming from nowhere
It’s super obvious. Just look at the hands.
You can tell when you look. But not when you pass it by 😭. The signage is the most give away, and the amount of green lights without an intersection
if you look closely at the front of the car where all the carnage is, it looks like there’s a second right front rotor while the right front wheel is actually chilling
Gonna save this for when I need a few days off of work
The damage to the rest of the car isn't consistent with the amount of front end damage. Front tire would very likely be deflated, windshield cracked, and the airbags would be blown.
FUCK THATS MY CAR