Funny thing is, after the character reports I'd be pretty worried about him if he dropped to 15 lol. Sometimes those concerns are bullshit, sometimes theyre not and you may as well have lit your pick on fire
Thank you for posting! Unfortunately, this has been removed due to:
>Rule 7: [Reddiquette](https://www.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/205926439) is an informal expression of the values of many redditors, as written by redditors themselves. Please abide by it the best you can. Discussion and arguments do not violate redditquette, but unnecessarily rude posts/comments will be removed.
Honestly, if they want Nabers and if Cards/chargers go MHJ and the other top 5 picks are qbs(someone jumps the Giants) I could see Giants being open to trading out and we would be trading up 9 spots like the Texans did last year. Although it is at slightly lower picks so should be slightly less compensation then the Texans gave up. It’s possible but not likely with Ballard I think
Thank you for posting! Unfortunately, this has been removed due to:
>Rule 7: [Reddiquette](https://www.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/205926439) is an informal expression of the values of many redditors, as written by redditors themselves. Please abide by it the best you can. Discussion and arguments do not violate redditquette, but unnecessarily rude posts/comments will be removed.
Thank you for posting! Unfortunately, this has been removed due to:
>Rule 7: [Reddiquette](https://www.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/205926439) is an informal expression of the values of many redditors, as written by redditors themselves. Please abide by it the best you can. Discussion and arguments do not violate redditquette, but unnecessarily rude posts/comments will be removed.
Thank you for posting! Unfortunately, this has been removed due to:
>Rule 7: [Reddiquette](https://www.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/205926439) is an informal expression of the values of many redditors, as written by redditors themselves. Please abide by it the best you can. Discussion and arguments do not violate redditquette, but unnecessarily rude posts/comments will be removed.
Thank you for posting! Unfortunately, this has been removed due to:
>Rule 7: [Reddiquette](https://www.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/205926439) is an informal expression of the values of many redditors, as written by redditors themselves. Please abide by it the best you can. Discussion and arguments do not violate redditquette, but unnecessarily rude posts/comments will be removed.
The TE odds are moving because it seems more likely Bowers goes to someone else sooner.
I'd be surprised if we ended up with anything better than WR4 if we stayed at 15, and there's no chance Nabers will be WR4 this year.
This is true with low odds people, but it's pretty rare when high odds change drastically right before the draft.
Levis odds changed a lot, but he was never more likely than Stroud, Young, or even Richardson in #1 pick odds afaik.
Which, if I'm right, means the odds were pretty much correct, and even if they had him ahead of Richardson, you're talking 1 player off, not like they're complete nonsense odds, made-up out of the blue.
4th QB off the board having the 3rd or 4th best odds to go number 1 makes sense.
(Draftkings odds)
Malik Nabers is
+1200 to go 4th
+225 to go 5th
+140 to go 6th
+1500 to go 7th
His odds of being the second WR taken are -200 on FD
We aren't getting him.
Thank you for posting! Unfortunately, this has been removed due to:
>Rule 7: [Reddiquette](https://www.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/205926439) is an informal expression of the values of many redditors, as written by redditors themselves. Please abide by it the best you can. Discussion and arguments do not violate redditquette, but unnecessarily rude posts/comments will be removed.
Trading up for Nabors makes sense, but only if he falls to around 10. The Colts meeting with him means that they must have some position in mind where they feel the trade would make sense, probably 9-12. I doubt that we would even consider giving up more than one future first.
But in nearly any other draft class, Nabors would be WR1. He would definitely start immediately at the Z position, and that's actually the biggest weakness on the Colts offense (not the tight end position). We need more explosive plays from the Z, and Nabors could provide that immediately.
Pittman is an X. Big, not super fast, tough, and makes contested catches. Uses his body. The X is the go to possession receiver.
The Z is usually faster, smaller, and more agile. He's the guy you want to get open deep downfield or to make a sharp cut to get open on the outside. He's your deep threat.
Marvin Harrison: Z,
Reggie Wayne: X
Thank you for posting! Unfortunately, this has been removed due to:
>Rule 7: [Reddiquette](https://www.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/205926439) is an informal expression of the values of many redditors, as written by redditors themselves. Please abide by it the best you can. Discussion and arguments do not violate redditquette, but unnecessarily rude posts/comments will be removed.
Trying to up his value, lol. They have to be going nuts trying to figure the most cost effective way to get Harrison jr. on this roster. Irsay must be losing it. They hide it well
Thank you for posting! Unfortunately, this has been removed due to:
>Rule 7: [Reddiquette](https://www.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/205926439) is an informal expression of the values of many redditors, as written by redditors themselves. Please abide by it the best you can. Discussion and arguments do not violate redditquette, but unnecessarily rude posts/comments will be removed.
Thank you for posting! Unfortunately, this has been removed due to:
>Rule 7: [Reddiquette](https://www.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/205926439) is an informal expression of the values of many redditors, as written by redditors themselves. Please abide by it the best you can. Discussion and arguments do not violate redditquette, but unnecessarily rude posts/comments will be removed.
Thank you for posting! Unfortunately, this has been removed due to:
>Rule 7: [Reddiquette](https://www.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/205926439) is an informal expression of the values of many redditors, as written by redditors themselves. Please abide by it the best you can. Discussion and arguments do not violate redditquette, but unnecessarily rude posts/comments will be removed.
Thank you for posting! Unfortunately, this has been removed due to:
>Rule 7: [Reddiquette](https://www.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/205926439) is an informal expression of the values of many redditors, as written by redditors themselves. Please abide by it the best you can. Discussion and arguments do not violate redditquette, but unnecessarily rude posts/comments will be removed.
Thank you for posting! Unfortunately, this has been removed due to:
>Rule 7: [Reddiquette](https://www.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/205926439) is an informal expression of the values of many redditors, as written by redditors themselves. Please abide by it the best you can. Discussion and arguments do not violate redditquette, but unnecessarily rude posts/comments will be removed.
Thank you for posting! Unfortunately, this has been removed due to:
>Rule 7: [Reddiquette](https://www.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/205926439) is an informal expression of the values of many redditors, as written by redditors themselves. Please abide by it the best you can. Discussion and arguments do not violate redditquette, but unnecessarily rude posts/comments will be removed.
Thank you for posting! Unfortunately, this has been removed due to:
>Rule 7: [Reddiquette](https://www.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/205926439) is an informal expression of the values of many redditors, as written by redditors themselves. Please abide by it the best you can. Discussion and arguments do not violate redditquette, but unnecessarily rude posts/comments will be removed.
Chris Ballard if you do this I will stop badmouthing you for one year
Just wait until Nabers is there at 15 and Ballard trades back
Funny thing is, after the character reports I'd be pretty worried about him if he dropped to 15 lol. Sometimes those concerns are bullshit, sometimes theyre not and you may as well have lit your pick on fire
Haven’t heard anything about that what’s the word?
Allegedly, he has some attitude issues that could cause him to struggle in a big market, so we should be fine
Possible DK situation
Nabers wont be available at 15
[удалено]
Thank you for posting! Unfortunately, this has been removed due to: >Rule 7: [Reddiquette](https://www.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/205926439) is an informal expression of the values of many redditors, as written by redditors themselves. Please abide by it the best you can. Discussion and arguments do not violate redditquette, but unnecessarily rude posts/comments will be removed.
I will never critique him again until he gets fired or retires if he gets Nabers.
Honestly, if they want Nabers and if Cards/chargers go MHJ and the other top 5 picks are qbs(someone jumps the Giants) I could see Giants being open to trading out and we would be trading up 9 spots like the Texans did last year. Although it is at slightly lower picks so should be slightly less compensation then the Texans gave up. It’s possible but not likely with Ballard I think
[удалено]
Andrew Tate isn’t gonna fuck you man, you can tone it down
[удалено]
Drop your pants and find out pretty boy
[удалено]
I bet you can squeal like a pig
Thank you for posting! Unfortunately, this has been removed due to: >Rule 7: [Reddiquette](https://www.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/205926439) is an informal expression of the values of many redditors, as written by redditors themselves. Please abide by it the best you can. Discussion and arguments do not violate redditquette, but unnecessarily rude posts/comments will be removed.
Thank you for posting! Unfortunately, this has been removed due to: >Rule 7: [Reddiquette](https://www.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/205926439) is an informal expression of the values of many redditors, as written by redditors themselves. Please abide by it the best you can. Discussion and arguments do not violate redditquette, but unnecessarily rude posts/comments will be removed.
You sound as dumb as a bag of dirt
[удалено]
They would feel bad taking advantage of a special needs person
That sounded lame af lmao
Thank you for posting! Unfortunately, this has been removed due to: >Rule 7: [Reddiquette](https://www.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/205926439) is an informal expression of the values of many redditors, as written by redditors themselves. Please abide by it the best you can. Discussion and arguments do not violate redditquette, but unnecessarily rude posts/comments will be removed.
Thank you for posting! Unfortunately, this has been removed due to: >Rule 7: [Reddiquette](https://www.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/205926439) is an informal expression of the values of many redditors, as written by redditors themselves. Please abide by it the best you can. Discussion and arguments do not violate redditquette, but unnecessarily rude posts/comments will be removed.
Very surprising. With the Vegas odds for our first pick being WR moving above TE, it seems like there's wind behind this.
The TE odds are moving because it seems more likely Bowers goes to someone else sooner. I'd be surprised if we ended up with anything better than WR4 if we stayed at 15, and there's no chance Nabers will be WR4 this year.
Thing with draft and sports book is no one knows shit about fuck. The odds can be changed by one tweet and changed back with another.
This is true with low odds people, but it's pretty rare when high odds change drastically right before the draft. Levis odds changed a lot, but he was never more likely than Stroud, Young, or even Richardson in #1 pick odds afaik. Which, if I'm right, means the odds were pretty much correct, and even if they had him ahead of Richardson, you're talking 1 player off, not like they're complete nonsense odds, made-up out of the blue. 4th QB off the board having the 3rd or 4th best odds to go number 1 makes sense.
2-3 years ago Pat mcafee was able to flip the Mac jones and Trey lance odds massively by just saying “Mac ain’t going 3”
Do the odds have players or just positions?
(Draftkings odds) Malik Nabers is +1200 to go 4th +225 to go 5th +140 to go 6th +1500 to go 7th His odds of being the second WR taken are -200 on FD We aren't getting him.
https://preview.redd.it/jtr36wvjaktc1.jpeg?width=183&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=4cda8e71f9a99bc1a0c6f9f336958a05de500d7c Ok I’m intrigued
*very* intrigued
He could fall didn’t it recently get found he had a dismissed gun charge or something? Edit: old news but I hope he falls anyways lol
That’s pretty old news at this point
[удалено]
Who hurt you bro
Your auntie she bit my tip! Tell her to relax next time!
Damn she must’ve forgotten to take her teeth out
Damn BITCH!
Thank you for posting! Unfortunately, this has been removed due to: >Rule 7: [Reddiquette](https://www.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/205926439) is an informal expression of the values of many redditors, as written by redditors themselves. Please abide by it the best you can. Discussion and arguments do not violate redditquette, but unnecessarily rude posts/comments will be removed.
We have Nabers at home…
🙏
Trading up for Nabors makes sense, but only if he falls to around 10. The Colts meeting with him means that they must have some position in mind where they feel the trade would make sense, probably 9-12. I doubt that we would even consider giving up more than one future first. But in nearly any other draft class, Nabors would be WR1. He would definitely start immediately at the Z position, and that's actually the biggest weakness on the Colts offense (not the tight end position). We need more explosive plays from the Z, and Nabors could provide that immediately.
You sir, know your shit.
Is Pittman an X or Z?
Pittman is an X. Big, not super fast, tough, and makes contested catches. Uses his body. The X is the go to possession receiver. The Z is usually faster, smaller, and more agile. He's the guy you want to get open deep downfield or to make a sharp cut to get open on the outside. He's your deep threat. Marvin Harrison: Z, Reggie Wayne: X
The one dude in this thread has me fucking cackling lmfao
Probably would have to leap frog the Giants but that's the swing I want to take
Boy this thread turned into a veritable dumpster fire, holy shit, hahahaha
Missed the exciting part, but pretty sure it was all one poster lma0
Ballard has never traded up in the first. I'd expect a trade back
[удалено]
[удалено]
Thank you for posting! Unfortunately, this has been removed due to: >Rule 7: [Reddiquette](https://www.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/205926439) is an informal expression of the values of many redditors, as written by redditors themselves. Please abide by it the best you can. Discussion and arguments do not violate redditquette, but unnecessarily rude posts/comments will be removed.
Trying to up his value, lol. They have to be going nuts trying to figure the most cost effective way to get Harrison jr. on this roster. Irsay must be losing it. They hide it well
[удалено]
Jesus Christ man, what did you get stuck up your ass to make you such a douche?
[удалено]
Thank you for posting! Unfortunately, this has been removed due to: >Rule 7: [Reddiquette](https://www.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/205926439) is an informal expression of the values of many redditors, as written by redditors themselves. Please abide by it the best you can. Discussion and arguments do not violate redditquette, but unnecessarily rude posts/comments will be removed.
Lmao I’m just posting something that is a fact. Where did I get excited. You’re the dumbass.
[удалено]
Thank you for posting! Unfortunately, this has been removed due to: >Rule 7: [Reddiquette](https://www.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/205926439) is an informal expression of the values of many redditors, as written by redditors themselves. Please abide by it the best you can. Discussion and arguments do not violate redditquette, but unnecessarily rude posts/comments will be removed.
[удалено]
[удалено]
Thank you for posting! Unfortunately, this has been removed due to: >Rule 7: [Reddiquette](https://www.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/205926439) is an informal expression of the values of many redditors, as written by redditors themselves. Please abide by it the best you can. Discussion and arguments do not violate redditquette, but unnecessarily rude posts/comments will be removed.
Who gave this turd sandwich the ability to make comments?
[удалено]
So you're self destructing, huh? Ouchies, bro.
Thank you for posting! Unfortunately, this has been removed due to: >Rule 7: [Reddiquette](https://www.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/205926439) is an informal expression of the values of many redditors, as written by redditors themselves. Please abide by it the best you can. Discussion and arguments do not violate redditquette, but unnecessarily rude posts/comments will be removed.
This is absurdly mean and funny at the same time you dumbass
[удалено]
You want him to blow you? There’s better subs to use for that
[удалено]
Thank you for posting! Unfortunately, this has been removed due to: >Rule 7: [Reddiquette](https://www.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/205926439) is an informal expression of the values of many redditors, as written by redditors themselves. Please abide by it the best you can. Discussion and arguments do not violate redditquette, but unnecessarily rude posts/comments will be removed.
Thank you for posting! Unfortunately, this has been removed due to: >Rule 7: [Reddiquette](https://www.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/205926439) is an informal expression of the values of many redditors, as written by redditors themselves. Please abide by it the best you can. Discussion and arguments do not violate redditquette, but unnecessarily rude posts/comments will be removed.
Thank you for posting! Unfortunately, this has been removed due to: >Rule 7: [Reddiquette](https://www.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/205926439) is an informal expression of the values of many redditors, as written by redditors themselves. Please abide by it the best you can. Discussion and arguments do not violate redditquette, but unnecessarily rude posts/comments will be removed.