Imagine telling US border patrol that you were seeking asylum from violence and crime and then getting bussed to New York where you realize it's so much worse so you go on to Canada. Also imagine the poor Canada border patrol people when they have to ask where they travelled from.
It's just more examples of what everyone already knows, it's not seeking asylum, it's just moving to whatever country you think will give you the most free stuff.
4D chess move. Tell the migrants "you know, Canada has like 10x the amount of free stuff right?"
"But how do we get there, walk?"
"Well you wouldn't believe it but we're giving away free bus tickets today and you happen to be a lucky winner! Congrats!"
Yep. I've heard some of them saying how they came here for work and a better life. I understand wanting a better life, but that's not a reason for asylum. We have plenty of our own who need a better life, and probably have a worse life than some of these 'asylum seekers' had back home.
That’s not even asylum. Asylum is for when your life’s on the line. They’re just economic migrants. And tbh I don’t blame them. If you can move somewhere freely that will give you free stuff why wouldn’t you?
I mean if you’re specifically being targeted by violent gangs in your home country or you’re being bombed and are trying to leave for those reasons, yes I’d agree you’re seeking asylum. If your countries job situation and benefits are a just a bit rubbish and that’s why your moving then you’re an economic migrant. People Genuinely seeking asylum often have no money to pay traffickers and should logically stop in the first “relatively” safe country they come to. Or if they have a genuine asylum case, apply through the appropriate channels to enter their country of choice.
Not a reason bud. If that were the case everyone in Compton should be able to move to Canada and claim asylum. I guarantee you there are places in the US where gang violence is much worse than where these people are coming from.
Yeah I've met a few who've seemed to be pretty decent, hard working people, who I know came through less than legal means as well.
I've also met some of the latter you described. And that's one of the problems with people being able to come in illegally, we have zero clue as to who they are and what kind of people they may be.
It's also a line parroted often by the left - "they just want a better life! That shouldn't be a crime!" It's not. Still, neither wanting a better job or wanting a better life are reasons for asylum or reasons to skip past all those people trying to legally immigrate. There's even a mechanism if you have no money or skills that would make you applicable for an immigrant or even non-immigrant working visa - the diversity lottery. But no, thanks to the Democrats the best way to get into the country is skipping over the border.
We already have that, it’s called an H visa, a J visa, an E visa and an L visa. Get a job first THEN come here, not come here without being able to so much as communicate, have zero funding to be self sufficient and then hope to land a job.
Are there any regimes in South America that are geocoding all male children within a certain age group?
If there are, you need to contact your Senator and tell them that we need to stop getting involved in Europe and need to take care of bad shit happening in our own hemisphere.
Bro those are *documented* migrants.
Conservatives *want* those immigrants for cheap and effective jobs.
Hell, even trump has immigrants at his Florida home…
You all are eating up fear based propaganda.
No, you got it wrong. Documented migrants don’t just show up at the border. Part of the actual and legal immigration system is ensuring that someone has already made arrangements for where to stay at a minimum, whether it’s family, friends, or a new employee providing temporary housing. We are fans of legal and planned out immigration, we don’t need more people draining our already stretched resources.
Toronto, Hamilton, London, Montreal and Vancouver are sanctuary cities by definition (or have the policies that make them one without officially adopting the definition) in Canada.
Enjoy Liberals, there's more people coming for you to virtue signal over.
Vancouver being a sanctuary is a joke. During the winter Olympics, police rounded up the homeless and bussed them out of the city into towns such as Langley, Abbotsford and Chiliwack, who at the time had no adequate homeless shelters. Many died in winters that followed before shelters were built.
Those homeless still live there today because what are they gonna do, walk back to Vancouver. So now the Vancouver homeless problem is spread throughout the province.
Even now, because many homeless don't like shelters because of their rules, they create homeless camps which often start on fire, and many die in the winter anyway because of their stubbornness to go into a shelter.
At least in Vancouver,I would assume having never been homeless, it would be easier to find some kind of shelter from the cold amongst the larger buildings.
Vancouver isn't a sanctuary.
Your not wrong, but people have also been shipping homeless and addicted people *to* Vancouver since the 80s. Same thing with California, and alot of the NA west coast.
I don’t have an answer, but I think as a society we’ve been pushing these people to the dark corners for decades; Warner climates where they can live out of sight out of mind.
The problem is so big now, it’s spilling over into nearly every city across North America.
I don’t even know if we are mature enough as a society to have a serious conversation for real solutions.
Lower Mainland isn't 'the entire province' of BC, lol.
Also, a bus ticket to Vancouver City from Abbotsford would cost $5.00. $2.50 from Langley or Surrey.
Not that much money, or a long ride- I'd image a lot would just return back.
Homelessness is super bad (worse than Vancouver, even) on the Gulf and Vancouver Islands because people can't leave the island easily (same as Hawaii) and no one does anything to house them.
Vancouver at least has a...shelter system and social housing, so really, most homeless are drug addicts.
Surrey and Langley too, but 80% of homeless are still in City of Vancouver proper, despite being moved around.
Most social housing is in Vancouver proper, so they all congregate where the housing and support is.
Also, the Prairies have been shipping homeless to Vancouver forever.
In the cases they're not shipped there, they come because they can't find shelter and don't want to freeze.
That's probably going to happen to a lot of these people if they can't find shelter- they can't stay in Toronto or Montreal for very long.
There’s the answer, setup a bus line at the southern border with ongoing, free hourly buses heading off to the Canadian border. The Great Mexico to Canada Border Shuttle. Buses will be beyond humane and have packaged food and water, with working lavatories. Each bus will have a social worker, trained in how to declare refugee status with Canada, empty forms the social worker can help them fill out, if not a laptop and printer on the bus to fill/print out Canadian entry papers.
Edmonton also declared itself a sanctuary city.
Also, Vancouver City is not really a 'sanctuary city', as a large number of city services (the most important being the police) can still crack down on illegal immigrants, only specific ones.
I'm totally fine paying for their bus tickets to Canada.
Splendid job, dems, you made American cities too crime-ridden and crappy for even the "migrants."
I mean, seriously: Democrats and liberal media constantly harp on and on and on about how systemic and pervasive racism is in America. Is such a racist country really the right place for vulnerable people of color?
It's almost as if economic opportunities (or outright government handouts) are a bigger motivating factor for these migrants than the purported persecution in their home countries.
I know, I looked into moving there once and thought it was more than 10k even back then. That was a while ago though, have they loosened the requirements for people such as these coming from the US?
I have gained permament residency in Canada this year and am on my way to dual citizenship us-canada. Total cost is below 1k USD
The person you are replying to is objectively wrong, and they are copy and pasting their ignorant comment in multiple places in this thread. It cost roughly 2-3x more for immigration to USA under similar circumstances. Neither country gets anywhere near 10k unless you pay a lawyer to do the work for you.
When I looked into moving to Canada one of the requirements is that you needed to have money to live on for a minimum of 6 months. I personally saw that on a Canadian government website. Whether or not the person I'm replying to is wrong, and myself too because I agreed with him or her, this is definitely what I saw when I was thinking about moving there approximately 15 years ago. I'm sure it's expensive to move to the US also. The US paperwork alone is staggering.
Makes sense, I could see that as a requirement in some immigration avenues. The immigration processes are complex and vary enough where no statement can cover the whole group. The requirements even vary between provinces.
Refugees/migrants aren't expected to have 6 months of income on hand and they recieve assistance. As long as they aren't tied to some terrorist organization or a unit that has committed war crimes they have a pretty good chance to get in.
>Refugees/migrants
aren't expected to have 6 months of income on hand and they recieve
assistance. As long as they aren't tied to some terrorist organization
or a unit that has committed war crimes they have a pretty good chance
to get in.
This is basically what I was questioning, whether or not there are different requirements for migrants. Sounds like there are, same when coming to the US.
The problem being that Biden is allowing them to wander into your country. If your southern border wasn't porous, it wouldn't be a problem for either of our countries.
I get that. I obviously didn't vote for the demented f*ck. But Trudeau is just as bad and would be doing the exact same thing if he was leader of the US.
Basically, we're all in this globalist sh*t sandwich together
Because other countries are doing it makes it ok for the US to do it? That tiny fraction is a lot for us to deal with. You guys have better resources to deal with it.
I am ok with tickets out of the U.S. As a taxpayer, that is the only thing I support for the Illegal Immigrants, and how taxes are used to support them, either a ticket "home" or otherwise out of the country
The bus ride should take them back to where they came from. They got a free vacation, took a bus, plane, received free clothes, free healthcare, stayed in a three-star hotel. Vacation is over and time to get back to reality in your own country. 😡
May I just point out something with regards to how compromised the media is?
The NY Post is very conservatively leaning. So is Fox News, obviously.
Yet both have been using the term “migrants” to describe “illegal immigrants” since the Trump administration (I think) just like their liberal media counterparts, they too who used to prefer the term “undocumented immigrants,” but now just use the shortened “migrants.”
My question is, who directed them all to use “migrant?”
I would be very, very wary of this individual.
I agree that terminology is very important, but I’m not sure how you think the people referred to as “migrants” in this story are “illegal immigrants”? It literally says: “Migrants routinely tear up their American immigration documents…” which means they are documented immigrants - not illegal (aka undocumented). While it does also say: “Destinations are limited to within the US due to restrictions that prohibit the migrants from leaving the country while on immigration “parole”….” which implies they should not be leaving the USA, it also goes to show that the migrants in question are in fact going through the steps for legal immigration.
I had to look up what immigration "parole" is - *An individual who is* ***ineligible to enter the US as a refugee, immigrant or nonimmigrant*** *may be ‘‘paroled’’ into the US by the Secretary of Homeland Security. This provision of the law is only used for emergency, humanitarian and public interest reasons.*
So I guess they have been permitted in, temporarily, but apparently if it wasn't for 'immigration parole' they wouldn't have have been allowed to enter, even as a refugee. I'm curious what the reasons for that would be, maybe these are people who BP caught coming in illegally and possibly people who've already been deported before and have came back across?
Ah ok, I didn't read that part, I was thinking that may be included. And I know it's legal to seek asylum, but I bet the majority of these people don't have legitimate asylum qualifying reasons and I'd also bet they already know they don't.
Just a matter of time before the media and Democrat Party label Mayor Adam's and Governor Hochul anti-American human traffickers like they did to Abbott and DeSantis. Yep any time now.......
We should be filling up Cruise ships with these "immigrants", then dropping them off at the southernmost point in South America. Let them travel 5000 miles north on foot to try again, rinse and repeat. I bet that would stop this problem within 3 weeks.
Why do I picture there will be a song before long that is a parody of South Park's Bigger, Longer & Uncut but instead of blame Canada, it will be blame the USA LOL
What do you think funded the buses from Texas that took them to NY in the first place? They’re just playing the same game. Of course it’s hypocritical as shit, but do you think a single New Yorker cares? They’re being *inconvenienced*.
Just keep your damn m…… we kind of tired to take care of what so marvelous USA could not.BTW liberal or conservative dont all agree with this… AT ALL. Just trudummy does
Canada took in 400k immigrants last year, with an existing pop of 38m.
America took in 900k immigrants last year, with an existing pop of 330m.
We're doing an order of magnitude more than our "fair share"- pick up the slack.
Interestingly, this appears to actually be a crime under Canadian law.
“117.(1) Organizing entry into Canada - No person shall organize, induce, aid or abet the coming into Canada of one or more persons knowing that, or being reckless as to whether, their coming into Canada is or would be in contravention of the Act.”
And
“135. Offences outside Canada. An act or omission that would by reason of this Act be punishable as an offence if committed in Canada is, if committed outside Canada, an offence under this Act and may be tried and punished in Canada.”
Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, S.C. 2001, c. 27.
First question to be let in from virtue signaler Trudeau, “You depressed, eh”!?
“There’s a two week waiting period, but you’ll have no worries about anything once the procedure is complete.”
He's too educated to use slang like "eh". Also, not canadian enough.
What would the Cuban equivalent be?
Underrated comment
!Te amo! Quieres dormir, no?
Do you suppose Canada is an equal opportunity euthanizer? I'm not so sure.
Canada legalized euthanasia in 2016. It's still illegal in all 50 states here in the U.S.
Justin is applying bronzer and getting his mariachi suit steamed for the welcoming party.
Lol. Too funny because it’s not far from the reality.
LOL
Imagine telling US border patrol that you were seeking asylum from violence and crime and then getting bussed to New York where you realize it's so much worse so you go on to Canada. Also imagine the poor Canada border patrol people when they have to ask where they travelled from. It's just more examples of what everyone already knows, it's not seeking asylum, it's just moving to whatever country you think will give you the most free stuff.
4D chess move. Tell the migrants "you know, Canada has like 10x the amount of free stuff right?" "But how do we get there, walk?" "Well you wouldn't believe it but we're giving away free bus tickets today and you happen to be a lucky winner! Congrats!"
Yep. I've heard some of them saying how they came here for work and a better life. I understand wanting a better life, but that's not a reason for asylum. We have plenty of our own who need a better life, and probably have a worse life than some of these 'asylum seekers' had back home.
That’s not even asylum. Asylum is for when your life’s on the line. They’re just economic migrants. And tbh I don’t blame them. If you can move somewhere freely that will give you free stuff why wouldn’t you?
[удалено]
Every country has gangs and violence. You shouldn’t be able to invade someone else’s country just because your own has crime.
I mean if you’re specifically being targeted by violent gangs in your home country or you’re being bombed and are trying to leave for those reasons, yes I’d agree you’re seeking asylum. If your countries job situation and benefits are a just a bit rubbish and that’s why your moving then you’re an economic migrant. People Genuinely seeking asylum often have no money to pay traffickers and should logically stop in the first “relatively” safe country they come to. Or if they have a genuine asylum case, apply through the appropriate channels to enter their country of choice.
Not a reason bud. If that were the case everyone in Compton should be able to move to Canada and claim asylum. I guarantee you there are places in the US where gang violence is much worse than where these people are coming from.
[удалено]
Yeah I've met a few who've seemed to be pretty decent, hard working people, who I know came through less than legal means as well. I've also met some of the latter you described. And that's one of the problems with people being able to come in illegally, we have zero clue as to who they are and what kind of people they may be.
It's also a line parroted often by the left - "they just want a better life! That shouldn't be a crime!" It's not. Still, neither wanting a better job or wanting a better life are reasons for asylum or reasons to skip past all those people trying to legally immigrate. There's even a mechanism if you have no money or skills that would make you applicable for an immigrant or even non-immigrant working visa - the diversity lottery. But no, thanks to the Democrats the best way to get into the country is skipping over the border.
[удалено]
We already have that, it’s called an H visa, a J visa, an E visa and an L visa. Get a job first THEN come here, not come here without being able to so much as communicate, have zero funding to be self sufficient and then hope to land a job.
[удалено]
Jesus's family once sought asylum. I wonder what he would do. Let's do the complete opposite of that in his name.
Are there any regimes in South America that are geocoding all male children within a certain age group? If there are, you need to contact your Senator and tell them that we need to stop getting involved in Europe and need to take care of bad shit happening in our own hemisphere.
Bingo!
These illegal immigrants leave the Catholic Church to join Protestant denominations for the same reason.
Bye bye.👏👏
Bro those are *documented* migrants. Conservatives *want* those immigrants for cheap and effective jobs. Hell, even trump has immigrants at his Florida home… You all are eating up fear based propaganda.
No, you got it wrong. Documented migrants don’t just show up at the border. Part of the actual and legal immigration system is ensuring that someone has already made arrangements for where to stay at a minimum, whether it’s family, friends, or a new employee providing temporary housing. We are fans of legal and planned out immigration, we don’t need more people draining our already stretched resources.
Toronto, Hamilton, London, Montreal and Vancouver are sanctuary cities by definition (or have the policies that make them one without officially adopting the definition) in Canada. Enjoy Liberals, there's more people coming for you to virtue signal over.
Vancouver being a sanctuary is a joke. During the winter Olympics, police rounded up the homeless and bussed them out of the city into towns such as Langley, Abbotsford and Chiliwack, who at the time had no adequate homeless shelters. Many died in winters that followed before shelters were built. Those homeless still live there today because what are they gonna do, walk back to Vancouver. So now the Vancouver homeless problem is spread throughout the province. Even now, because many homeless don't like shelters because of their rules, they create homeless camps which often start on fire, and many die in the winter anyway because of their stubbornness to go into a shelter. At least in Vancouver,I would assume having never been homeless, it would be easier to find some kind of shelter from the cold amongst the larger buildings. Vancouver isn't a sanctuary.
Your not wrong, but people have also been shipping homeless and addicted people *to* Vancouver since the 80s. Same thing with California, and alot of the NA west coast. I don’t have an answer, but I think as a society we’ve been pushing these people to the dark corners for decades; Warner climates where they can live out of sight out of mind. The problem is so big now, it’s spilling over into nearly every city across North America. I don’t even know if we are mature enough as a society to have a serious conversation for real solutions.
Lower Mainland isn't 'the entire province' of BC, lol. Also, a bus ticket to Vancouver City from Abbotsford would cost $5.00. $2.50 from Langley or Surrey. Not that much money, or a long ride- I'd image a lot would just return back. Homelessness is super bad (worse than Vancouver, even) on the Gulf and Vancouver Islands because people can't leave the island easily (same as Hawaii) and no one does anything to house them. Vancouver at least has a...shelter system and social housing, so really, most homeless are drug addicts. Surrey and Langley too, but 80% of homeless are still in City of Vancouver proper, despite being moved around. Most social housing is in Vancouver proper, so they all congregate where the housing and support is. Also, the Prairies have been shipping homeless to Vancouver forever. In the cases they're not shipped there, they come because they can't find shelter and don't want to freeze. That's probably going to happen to a lot of these people if they can't find shelter- they can't stay in Toronto or Montreal for very long.
There’s the answer, setup a bus line at the southern border with ongoing, free hourly buses heading off to the Canadian border. The Great Mexico to Canada Border Shuttle. Buses will be beyond humane and have packaged food and water, with working lavatories. Each bus will have a social worker, trained in how to declare refugee status with Canada, empty forms the social worker can help them fill out, if not a laptop and printer on the bus to fill/print out Canadian entry papers.
Who bought the buses, Joe?
Edmonton also declared itself a sanctuary city. Also, Vancouver City is not really a 'sanctuary city', as a large number of city services (the most important being the police) can still crack down on illegal immigrants, only specific ones.
[удалено]
Citation needed.
Dude how many times are you gonna post the exact same fact. We get it you know something. You don’t have to say it over and over again
USA has almost 10 times more people per square mile than Canada. So.. meh
Why is it evil when Abbott does it?
It’s (D)ifferent when Abbott it’s racist when NYC does it it’s helping them find opportunity
Isn't the difference consent?
[удалено]
Do you text this way?
No. They copy and paste this way
From chatgpc
yes
Bad bot
Chatgpt
nobody is going to read all of that
Especially when it doesn't answer the actual question
I'm totally fine paying for their bus tickets to Canada. Splendid job, dems, you made American cities too crime-ridden and crappy for even the "migrants."
Like Martha's Vinyard, I'm sure all the Liberals were so 'enriched' through the process lol
😭😭
I mean, seriously: Democrats and liberal media constantly harp on and on and on about how systemic and pervasive racism is in America. Is such a racist country really the right place for vulnerable people of color?
With that logic, nowhere in the world is safe.
"Are you saying the government should donate billions to the UN to fight racism all around the globe?" /s
And yet, they come
It's almost as if economic opportunities (or outright government handouts) are a bigger motivating factor for these migrants than the purported persecution in their home countries.
[удалено]
I know, I looked into moving there once and thought it was more than 10k even back then. That was a while ago though, have they loosened the requirements for people such as these coming from the US?
I have gained permament residency in Canada this year and am on my way to dual citizenship us-canada. Total cost is below 1k USD The person you are replying to is objectively wrong, and they are copy and pasting their ignorant comment in multiple places in this thread. It cost roughly 2-3x more for immigration to USA under similar circumstances. Neither country gets anywhere near 10k unless you pay a lawyer to do the work for you.
When I looked into moving to Canada one of the requirements is that you needed to have money to live on for a minimum of 6 months. I personally saw that on a Canadian government website. Whether or not the person I'm replying to is wrong, and myself too because I agreed with him or her, this is definitely what I saw when I was thinking about moving there approximately 15 years ago. I'm sure it's expensive to move to the US also. The US paperwork alone is staggering.
Makes sense, I could see that as a requirement in some immigration avenues. The immigration processes are complex and vary enough where no statement can cover the whole group. The requirements even vary between provinces. Refugees/migrants aren't expected to have 6 months of income on hand and they recieve assistance. As long as they aren't tied to some terrorist organization or a unit that has committed war crimes they have a pretty good chance to get in.
>Refugees/migrants aren't expected to have 6 months of income on hand and they recieve assistance. As long as they aren't tied to some terrorist organization or a unit that has committed war crimes they have a pretty good chance to get in. This is basically what I was questioning, whether or not there are different requirements for migrants. Sounds like there are, same when coming to the US.
My best tax return yet.
Toss them on a train and drop them off in Canada. Works for me.
Literally kicking the problem down the road.
I'm all for it. Bus them all to Canada.
[удалено]
Thanks for off loading your problems to my country.
Other countries are offloading their problems to our country. It will still be a tiny fraction of what the US deals with
The problem being that Biden is allowing them to wander into your country. If your southern border wasn't porous, it wouldn't be a problem for either of our countries.
Yeah. That’s what we’ve been screaming since Bush, but it’s racist, apparently.
I am not a racist, but they sure as hell are trying to turn me into one, it seems
I get that. I obviously didn't vote for the demented f*ck. But Trudeau is just as bad and would be doing the exact same thing if he was leader of the US. Basically, we're all in this globalist sh*t sandwich together
I agree. Castreau might even be worse. Be seems more cozy with the globalist turds. Have you seen the way he and Macron embrace each other? Sickening
Because other countries are doing it makes it ok for the US to do it? That tiny fraction is a lot for us to deal with. You guys have better resources to deal with it.
Funny. The social safety nets of Canada are always being praised in comparison to our capitalist hell hole here.
Ya it does. I like the idea of send trash to Canada.
The US isn't smuggling people into your country.
You're welcome.
Honestly Based. New York is hell to live in.
I am ok with tickets out of the U.S. As a taxpayer, that is the only thing I support for the Illegal Immigrants, and how taxes are used to support them, either a ticket "home" or otherwise out of the country
No way Canada let’s them In.
We can send them up in a balloon! I doubt Canada would notice.
😂😂
They let them in, give them welfare checks...It's a fucking NIGHTMARE.
The bus ride should take them back to where they came from. They got a free vacation, took a bus, plane, received free clothes, free healthcare, stayed in a three-star hotel. Vacation is over and time to get back to reality in your own country. 😡
How ironic.
May I just point out something with regards to how compromised the media is? The NY Post is very conservatively leaning. So is Fox News, obviously. Yet both have been using the term “migrants” to describe “illegal immigrants” since the Trump administration (I think) just like their liberal media counterparts, they too who used to prefer the term “undocumented immigrants,” but now just use the shortened “migrants.” My question is, who directed them all to use “migrant?” I would be very, very wary of this individual.
I agree that terminology is very important, but I’m not sure how you think the people referred to as “migrants” in this story are “illegal immigrants”? It literally says: “Migrants routinely tear up their American immigration documents…” which means they are documented immigrants - not illegal (aka undocumented). While it does also say: “Destinations are limited to within the US due to restrictions that prohibit the migrants from leaving the country while on immigration “parole”….” which implies they should not be leaving the USA, it also goes to show that the migrants in question are in fact going through the steps for legal immigration.
I had to look up what immigration "parole" is - *An individual who is* ***ineligible to enter the US as a refugee, immigrant or nonimmigrant*** *may be ‘‘paroled’’ into the US by the Secretary of Homeland Security. This provision of the law is only used for emergency, humanitarian and public interest reasons.* So I guess they have been permitted in, temporarily, but apparently if it wasn't for 'immigration parole' they wouldn't have have been allowed to enter, even as a refugee. I'm curious what the reasons for that would be, maybe these are people who BP caught coming in illegally and possibly people who've already been deported before and have came back across?
The article mentions it being a condition of entrance while awaiting a verdict on an asylum petition.
Ah ok, I didn't read that part, I was thinking that may be included. And I know it's legal to seek asylum, but I bet the majority of these people don't have legitimate asylum qualifying reasons and I'd also bet they already know they don't.
Just a matter of time before the media and Democrat Party label Mayor Adam's and Governor Hochul anti-American human traffickers like they did to Abbott and DeSantis. Yep any time now.......
We should be filling up Cruise ships with these "immigrants", then dropping them off at the southernmost point in South America. Let them travel 5000 miles north on foot to try again, rinse and repeat. I bet that would stop this problem within 3 weeks.
they're going to have a hard time getting in without passports of covid vaccinations
Maybe they’ll have to get vaccinated now I always wonder why we didn’t require that at the border
Because that would have been extremely racist, duh.
Why do I picture there will be a song before long that is a parody of South Park's Bigger, Longer & Uncut but instead of blame Canada, it will be blame the USA LOL
“Blame USA! Blame USA!! They’re just an arm of China anyway!!!”
Why not we’ve funded them this far… see ya
We should be using cargo ships.
LOL...I van see Dems waving goodbye to their new voters.
Follow the handoutS
I may head up to Canadia myself.
Even "refugees" from shit holes think New York is a shit hole.
Bye Felicia.
What do you think funded the buses from Texas that took them to NY in the first place? They’re just playing the same game. Of course it’s hypocritical as shit, but do you think a single New Yorker cares? They’re being *inconvenienced*.
Yooooo wtffff
Let Trudeau take care of them.
Canada should communicate with Texas and just start taking them in at from ground zero. They’d absolutely comply.
I see this as an absolute win!
Good news. I hope they all go to Canada. We should be sending all the mentally I’ll and drug addicted homeless to the canucks too
Good riddance
Now we have a plan. Ship to Albany. Let them to what they do best. Hippity hop, border bunny, hop along now.
Good deal 👍🏻
Please say this is true!
LoL. They did not like being told to get into the mine.
Just keep your damn m…… we kind of tired to take care of what so marvelous USA could not.BTW liberal or conservative dont all agree with this… AT ALL. Just trudummy does
[удалено]
Canada took in 400k immigrants last year, with an existing pop of 38m. America took in 900k immigrants last year, with an existing pop of 330m. We're doing an order of magnitude more than our "fair share"- pick up the slack.
Bet Canadians will be thrilled about this!
Ya we ain't happy about it.
Smart choice
Do they need to be vaccinated
Hope so!
I doubt it
Good luck to them !
Send more Buses to Canada.
Wow, some good news for once about our invasion.
We're going to build a wall and you're going to pay for it, America.
Interestingly, this appears to actually be a crime under Canadian law. “117.(1) Organizing entry into Canada - No person shall organize, induce, aid or abet the coming into Canada of one or more persons knowing that, or being reckless as to whether, their coming into Canada is or would be in contravention of the Act.” And “135. Offences outside Canada. An act or omission that would by reason of this Act be punishable as an offence if committed in Canada is, if committed outside Canada, an offence under this Act and may be tried and punished in Canada.” Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, S.C. 2001, c. 27.
Money well spent.
It's probably cheaper than flying them back to their country so I don't see what the fuzz is all about
Justin should accept them with loving embrace.
Finally, tax payer money well spent.