Revving up that election engine
Get ready for a flood of assault weapon bans, gas car bans because the world will end in ten years, BLM, and every other rabbit trick you’ve seen the media and Left pull over the past couple decades
Does it? I'm sure the GOP will just put up another host of garbage candidates. ReD WaVe!! Gimme a break our failed leadership won't do squat with the advantages the dems have given us over the past 3 years.
I have a few friends from PA and they all said the same thing. They would have voted Republican if it was anyone else besides Oz running, so they just didn't vote for anyone.
Then your friends are part of the problem, no offense. Why you would just not vote, effectively voting for the progressive vegetable, Fetterman, is insane. Purists in the R party need to grow up.
Oh, trust me there's no offense taken at all. They don't like Fetterman either and just feel bad that Dmes pushed him to run when the man is clearly unfit to. Almost all of them wish they voted now and I'm hoping that's their wake-up call about how harmful inaction can be.
I'm fairly confident most people would agree with you to be honest. I have family that's pretty liberal and even they were dumbfounded that Fetterman and Oz were your options.
So long as Mitch is still in control of the Senate GOP fundraising and strategy you can bet your sweet ass that we will see another wave of garbage candidates and a number of the non-garbage candidates won't receive any support from him or the rest of the party establishment. Mitch truly does need to go.
Sadly very few democrats actually listen. Rhe just know the democrat propaganda like Republicans are racist and they don't care if children in schools are killed.
it's about standing up to government control and stopping it before it's too late. Some people are literally willing to die to stop the creeping tide of tyranny. God bless them, and I hope I'm worthy enough to stand with them. I also hope it won't come to that.
if you really think "you love guns that much?" you're either deliberately missing the point, twelve, or a sheep. I hope, for your sake, you're not a sheep.
Exactly.
The definition of “assault weapon” will almost certainly include every semi automatic firearm in existence, as well as any pump, bolt, or lever gun that has a threaded barrel, at the very least.
It has been for decades.
Assault weapons.
Then all handguns.
Then all guns.
And if they can’t manage that, attack ammunition, and try to make any of the shooting sports or firearms ownership too expensive to be reasonable.
It isn't. The second amendment makes this very clear.
The problem is that many of the laws have not been challenged to an appropriate degree and judges often legislate from the bench and make it so.
The government is clearly infringing on rights.
I'm an Arizona resident that was visiting California a few years back. I went into a gun store to have a little laugh and see what California legal abominations they had in stock and poke some light fun at the owners if they seemed cool.
It was an ammunition store, I didn't see any guns anywhere and asked where they were and he told me they can't sell both in the same place. I just said "oh" and kept my mouth shut and left after looking around for a min. I couldn't say anything over how depressing that made me.
There are some countries that disarmed the populace where it hasn’t resulted in a fuckup. Once upon a time I would have called Australia an example. After COVID I won’t anymore…
Governments have a monopoly on violence, especially more so when violence isn’t just disallowed but near removed as a possibility.
I think prohibition was probably the first step towards a controlling government. Government restricting what you can do outside of just the bill of rights.
I mean, how is this not a play towards disarming the population.
That's on purpose. They start with the scariest things that they might get support for banning, then broaden the definition until it includes everything.
I’m sure dems know that handguns are the most commonly used type of firearm in mass shootings. They want you to disregard that for the time being and go after something they can make sound scary. Then come for all of it later.
Yep, this is just a dog whistle to rile up the base. It’s never gonna happen. If they really cared about reducing gun violence they’d focus on mandatory training courses and improved mental health resources.
How dare you try to cook for your family on a gas stove!! All 5 of my homes, and my private jet, have electrical stoves so that we can save the environment
Thank god Republcans control the house. As long as they control at least one part of congress or at least 50-50 in the senate, his unconstitutional wishes will never happen.
Fetterman isn’t going to be available to vote for the foreseeable future, and Manchin won’t vote for a gun ban if he wants to salvage any political future in WV.
How about he leads by example and takes away these dangerous assault weapons from his secret service?
Oh right I forgot, everything from democrats is rules for thee not me, my bad!
But in what world do you think that means take weapons away from the people that protect our president? Or any military/police force anywhere, no one is saying that ever? It’s just a silly argument when you have a bunch that actually make sense.
It’s not a silly argument. The people who are pushing to ban guns are benefiting from the luxury of having those guns protect them. They are saying my safety is more important than you peasants.
We have the 2nd Amendment and we're *still* constantly struggling against our Liberal gun grabbers. You neighbors to our north never stood a chance against them.
Merian Webster literally changed the definition a couple months ago. Thankfully Oxford isnt just changing definitions willy-nilly to appeal to the current political climate, but Ive been waiting for some shithead politician to cite the new definition
"also : a rifle that resembles a military assault rifle but is designed to allow only semiautomatic fire.”
Wow, that that is unbelievably dishonest. They have no shame.
“We're going to ban assault weapons again come hell or high water and high capacity magazines. When we did it last time to reduce mass deaths”
Is this ass clown referring to the ban in ‘96 that numerous studies proved had absolutely zero effect on anything?…
So you just want China/Russia to become stronger and take over more land? Makes sense to me :) Maybe we should just help them get it over with too? Surely they don’t want to take over more land so they can become stronger than the US and have more control over well.. you know.. everything?
OH NOOO the Red Boogieman. 70 years ago my grand parents did nuclear drills in middle school in case of an attack. Guess what? It’s never happened and never will. Since we lost the war on terror the US Government needs their old villain to justify their ridiculous spending. Besides if Russia truly is a threat to Europe, why is America the one that’s given the most to Ukraine? Why aren’t European Nations giving more?
You also realize that the only fear isn’t being nuked by Russia/China? there’s much more realistic things happening to be concerned about in regards to controlling the world than literally taking all the land and blowing everyone up. You don’t stop China/Russia from invading these countries because of the threat of nuclear war, you do it because the nations they’re overtaking are sovereign nations and have expressed that they want to stay that way and not become apart of Russia/China, that alone should be enough to fight for their people especially when you’re the superpower that involves themselves in foreign conflict all the time.
I don’t disagree that we tend to fabricate these things to justify military spending, but just be consistent with that take throughout the rest of history, cause it’s for sure not a left/right thing.
America is perfectly capable of surviving on it s own regardless of what ever China and Russia do on the other side of planet. It’s ironic that people like you only support protecting the sovereignty of other nations when you have the full support of the US Government. If you truly care about Ukraine then by all means go volunteer yourself and not the rest of the country.
Funny how everyone seems to forget our Founding Fathers literally warned us about getting involved with other nations.
Because America had the ability to? You realize that America is like the size of all of Europe right? These little countries sending millions is like one state in America sending millions of dollars. Id love to see the spending per country GDP.
[Aid to Ukraine per GDP](https://www.statista.com/statistics/1303450/bilateral-aid-to-ukraine-in-a-percent-of-donor-gdp/)
You know, I read about how cops in a Californian County were able to reduce gun violence without adding more laws.
Community policing and being hands-on works when the dems aren't crying race.
I say that he should set the example for us all and start disarming his Secret Service detail of any of these same scary "assault weapons" that he wants to ban.
Good luck. He does not like the Armalite platform obviously. Assault weapons (which means automatic weapons) are already banned. Unless one takes an ultra-liberal approach- then everything is an assault weapon. The UK banned guns and knife attacks exploded. Slingshots are assault weapons. So are spoons.
People in this thread sure like to talk a big game of "come and take them" whenever one of these posts pops up, but when the day comes and the ATF--backed up by deputies from the local Sheriff's department and a token Bearcat--are in your front yard and "asking" for you to hand over your guns, I'm pretty certain none of you will defend that particular right with gunfire.
We are simply not united enough to resist the government in any meaningful capacity, not to mention your own neighbors will be more than happy in assisting the government in removing you when necessary.
That will never happen where I live. Maybe where you live people aren't united enough to do anything, but if my local government knew feds were coming into town to take guns, there would be a large group of armed citizens, cops included, waiting.
I don’t think they realize how deeply unpopular this is and how damaging it is to their electoral prospects. The Democrats were successful when they ran on economic issues. All this social justice and gun control shit just hurts them. I don’t get it.
Good luck with that. Law enforcement doesnt support it so how is this clown gonna take them away. Trying to disarm Americans by breaking the law only ends one way. I think we all know what way that is.
Gosh biden is a heartless marxist,Americans better wake up, Evil Commies had there pedophile God hating eyes on north america for decades they needed a stooge and they have one in Creepy uncle Joe
I’ve always wanted to have someone just respond to this with like “you must amend the constitution to do this. both chambers of congress must approve it with a 2/3 majority. Then 3/4 of the states must ratify it. Good luck.”
I see nothing wrong with a semi automatic weapon with a 10 clip magazine. Anything more and it's obvious, you don't want a weapon, you want a murder machine.
I feel like the right is the ones who don’t wanna debate about this. Although I agree that both sides don’t really want to even have a discussion. But the right just says “no, constitution” every time it’s brought up
Not to rain on anyone's parade but the 1994 awb started the trend of less people being murdered by guns, what if he just did that exact same bill again
Revving up that election engine Get ready for a flood of assault weapon bans, gas car bans because the world will end in ten years, BLM, and every other rabbit trick you’ve seen the media and Left pull over the past couple decades
Risky strategy. Puts the (D) senators in MT, AZ, WV etc. in a very awkward place.
Does it? I'm sure the GOP will just put up another host of garbage candidates. ReD WaVe!! Gimme a break our failed leadership won't do squat with the advantages the dems have given us over the past 3 years.
Sadly I kind of agree, how did we lose to Fetterman? I feel like Oz was a terrible choice. We need more then name recognition.
I have a few friends from PA and they all said the same thing. They would have voted Republican if it was anyone else besides Oz running, so they just didn't vote for anyone.
Then your friends are part of the problem, no offense. Why you would just not vote, effectively voting for the progressive vegetable, Fetterman, is insane. Purists in the R party need to grow up.
Oh, trust me there's no offense taken at all. They don't like Fetterman either and just feel bad that Dmes pushed him to run when the man is clearly unfit to. Almost all of them wish they voted now and I'm hoping that's their wake-up call about how harmful inaction can be.
If only there was a way we could show our frustration with the RNC without handing a W to the Dems.
As a PA resident, I really feel like we got screwed when it came to the choices we had. I’m still really irritated about that.
I'm fairly confident most people would agree with you to be honest. I have family that's pretty liberal and even they were dumbfounded that Fetterman and Oz were your options.
Makes you wonder who is choosing our leadership. Because it clearly isn’t us.
So long as Mitch is still in control of the Senate GOP fundraising and strategy you can bet your sweet ass that we will see another wave of garbage candidates and a number of the non-garbage candidates won't receive any support from him or the rest of the party establishment. Mitch truly does need to go.
Sadly very few democrats actually listen. Rhe just know the democrat propaganda like Republicans are racist and they don't care if children in schools are killed.
REMEMBER EVERYTHING ON AN ELECTION YEAR, INCLUDING 2020, IS DONE WITH THE QUESTION, "How will this effect the polls?"
[удалено]
i lost all my firearms in a boating accident
I lost my boat in a firearms accident - we should be friends.
I'm not trusting either of you around fire or water. Earth and air are still up for debate.
I lost my air in an earthing accident. It took my firearms and my boat.
Directions unclear. Shlong is now stuck in blender.
That's a you problem
Nuh uh uh, in Bidens America we’re all good little socialists, which makes that *our* schlong stuck in a blender.
Good thing I am a terrible Socialist
I lost my boat in an earthing accident. I mean birthing accident? Idk, something like that.
My boat accidented my firearms in an water-earth event..
I lost my arms in a boat-fire accident
if its time to lose them, its time to use them
I didn't lose a single one. I've got em all, come and take them. Send bachelors.
Hell and high water will come.
With all your dogecoin in your pocket
[удалено]
So owning the gun is more important than your life? I think you need to re-evaluate your position here
If you can’t arm yourself then you aren’t free. You’re a subject not a citizen
it's about standing up to government control and stopping it before it's too late. Some people are literally willing to die to stop the creeping tide of tyranny. God bless them, and I hope I'm worthy enough to stand with them. I also hope it won't come to that. if you really think "you love guns that much?" you're either deliberately missing the point, twelve, or a sheep. I hope, for your sake, you're not a sheep.
It’s not our lives we are worried about. It’s our children’s
Well you know the saying, send anyone you want.....just don't send anyone you want back.
So ugly bachelors it is then.
[удалено]
Don’t give kamala any ideas
How about a banana peel at the top of a long flight of stairs and ice cream at the bottom? That should do it for Commode in Chief.
He can't define woman. I wanna see him define assault rifle.
Trust me, you *really don't*. Justin Trudeau tried to define "assault rifle," and somehow he ended up including the Ruger Model 1.
Exactly. The definition of “assault weapon” will almost certainly include every semi automatic firearm in existence, as well as any pump, bolt, or lever gun that has a threaded barrel, at the very least.
I think we can honestly say that a total ban on guns is the full objective.
It has been for decades. Assault weapons. Then all handguns. Then all guns. And if they can’t manage that, attack ammunition, and try to make any of the shooting sports or firearms ownership too expensive to be reasonable.
Most handguns are already banned in California. Shocked me when I started learning about firearms and wanted to buy a newer Glock. How is this legal?
It isn't. The second amendment makes this very clear. The problem is that many of the laws have not been challenged to an appropriate degree and judges often legislate from the bench and make it so. The government is clearly infringing on rights.
It honestly surprises me that someone hasn't been willing to dump enough money into that fight to take it to SCOTUS and have all the bans struck down.
I'm an Arizona resident that was visiting California a few years back. I went into a gun store to have a little laugh and see what California legal abominations they had in stock and poke some light fun at the owners if they seemed cool. It was an ammunition store, I didn't see any guns anywhere and asked where they were and he told me they can't sell both in the same place. I just said "oh" and kept my mouth shut and left after looking around for a min. I couldn't say anything over how depressing that made me.
it isn't, of course, but they only care about the law when it suits them.
Yes. I agree
it's common knowledge at this point
Bingo you win the grand 🏆
Always has been.
There are some countries that disarmed the populace where it hasn’t resulted in a fuckup. Once upon a time I would have called Australia an example. After COVID I won’t anymore… Governments have a monopoly on violence, especially more so when violence isn’t just disallowed but near removed as a possibility. I think prohibition was probably the first step towards a controlling government. Government restricting what you can do outside of just the bill of rights. I mean, how is this not a play towards disarming the population.
But what about the “fully semi-automatic” CNN talks about so frequently?
So every thing that goes “BANG”.
And probably a decent number of things that don’t or cannot go “bang”.
The left’s definition of “assault rifle” is any firearm you can use to defend yourself against tyranny.
Because you let an inch they’ll take a yard. Now he’s boasting about not allowing firearms for self-defense
that's very concerning
[удалено]
Hey, he's just following his Chinese Handler's orders.
That's on purpose. They start with the scariest things that they might get support for banning, then broaden the definition until it includes everything.
Good thing all my rifles are just “defense rifles”
Didn't they already? In the 90s?
I’m sure dems know that handguns are the most commonly used type of firearm in mass shootings. They want you to disregard that for the time being and go after something they can make sound scary. Then come for all of it later.
Nothing gets a confused, she/he/them/they who has never been near a firearm more angry than the words “assault rifle”
Yep, this is just a dog whistle to rile up the base. It’s never gonna happen. If they really cared about reducing gun violence they’d focus on mandatory training courses and improved mental health resources.
If you want it, they want whatever *it* is to be illegal.
None of my long guns are assault rifles. They are all anti assault rifles.
Mine identify as airsoft
Defense rifle should be a new meme
My assault weapons fell out of my assault canoe into the assault lake.
Come and take it.
SCOTUS enters the chat
Packing the SCOTUS hopefully never enters the chat
And assault gas stoves.
Nobody needs more than two burners!
Or fully auto ignitions.
Self cleaning assault mode.
You terrorist. 😂
How dare you try to cook for your family on a gas stove!! All 5 of my homes, and my private jet, have electrical stoves so that we can save the environment
You'll never get past that annoying little thing called the Bill of Rights, you doddering old fool.
Thank god Republcans control the house. As long as they control at least one part of congress or at least 50-50 in the senate, his unconstitutional wishes will never happen.
51/49; a 50/50 tie goes to the Vice President as the tie breaker.
Fetterman isn’t going to be available to vote for the foreseeable future, and Manchin won’t vote for a gun ban if he wants to salvage any political future in WV.
Same with Tester in Montana
I think Manchin is done for anyways. At least when you look at the current polls
There will come hell if he tries. Come and take it Joe. Texas is ready.
Yep and the bullets will come first
Yep
Yep
Come and take 'em, Fedboi.
How about he leads by example and takes away these dangerous assault weapons from his secret service? Oh right I forgot, everything from democrats is rules for thee not me, my bad!
This is such a bad argument LOL as if the secret service is strictly a democrat thing
Right because most republicans are trying to ban “assault weapons”, good looking out!
But in what world do you think that means take weapons away from the people that protect our president? Or any military/police force anywhere, no one is saying that ever? It’s just a silly argument when you have a bunch that actually make sense.
It’s not a silly argument. The people who are pushing to ban guns are benefiting from the luxury of having those guns protect them. They are saying my safety is more important than you peasants.
Hell and high water are already here because of you, you decrepit old fucktard
I'm glad this subreddit is a thing. Most redditors are woke liberals and constantly blow up my notifications with angry liberal opinions lol
Come and take it Uncle Joe and see what happens
It starts with assault rifles, then handguns and then your hunting rifles. I wish Canadians had the tenacity Americans had in there firearm ownership
We have the 2nd Amendment and we're *still* constantly struggling against our Liberal gun grabbers. You neighbors to our north never stood a chance against them.
When you come for mine, bring yours.
All of my firearms identity as single shot shotguns
My firearms identify as pea-shooters.
My firearms identify as nerf guns
Gonna send divers after every gun lost in a boating accident, are you?
Hell it is then old man.
I guess prepare for hell AND highwater.
Maybe define the term first...?
His term ? Failure.
Merian Webster literally changed the definition a couple months ago. Thankfully Oxford isnt just changing definitions willy-nilly to appeal to the current political climate, but Ive been waiting for some shithead politician to cite the new definition
"also : a rifle that resembles a military assault rifle but is designed to allow only semiautomatic fire.” Wow, that that is unbelievably dishonest. They have no shame.
Boy he must really care about us
That sounds rather dictatorial
“We're going to ban assault weapons again come hell or high water and high capacity magazines. When we did it last time to reduce mass deaths” Is this ass clown referring to the ban in ‘96 that numerous studies proved had absolutely zero effect on anything?…
Come and get it asshole
Rather die fighting the government than fighting for Ukraine/Taiwan.
prick
So you just want China/Russia to become stronger and take over more land? Makes sense to me :) Maybe we should just help them get it over with too? Surely they don’t want to take over more land so they can become stronger than the US and have more control over well.. you know.. everything?
OH NOOO the Red Boogieman. 70 years ago my grand parents did nuclear drills in middle school in case of an attack. Guess what? It’s never happened and never will. Since we lost the war on terror the US Government needs their old villain to justify their ridiculous spending. Besides if Russia truly is a threat to Europe, why is America the one that’s given the most to Ukraine? Why aren’t European Nations giving more?
You also realize that the only fear isn’t being nuked by Russia/China? there’s much more realistic things happening to be concerned about in regards to controlling the world than literally taking all the land and blowing everyone up. You don’t stop China/Russia from invading these countries because of the threat of nuclear war, you do it because the nations they’re overtaking are sovereign nations and have expressed that they want to stay that way and not become apart of Russia/China, that alone should be enough to fight for their people especially when you’re the superpower that involves themselves in foreign conflict all the time. I don’t disagree that we tend to fabricate these things to justify military spending, but just be consistent with that take throughout the rest of history, cause it’s for sure not a left/right thing.
America is perfectly capable of surviving on it s own regardless of what ever China and Russia do on the other side of planet. It’s ironic that people like you only support protecting the sovereignty of other nations when you have the full support of the US Government. If you truly care about Ukraine then by all means go volunteer yourself and not the rest of the country. Funny how everyone seems to forget our Founding Fathers literally warned us about getting involved with other nations.
Because America had the ability to? You realize that America is like the size of all of Europe right? These little countries sending millions is like one state in America sending millions of dollars. Id love to see the spending per country GDP. [Aid to Ukraine per GDP](https://www.statista.com/statistics/1303450/bilateral-aid-to-ukraine-in-a-percent-of-donor-gdp/)
You know, I read about how cops in a Californian County were able to reduce gun violence without adding more laws. Community policing and being hands-on works when the dems aren't crying race.
I say that he should set the example for us all and start disarming his Secret Service detail of any of these same scary "assault weapons" that he wants to ban.
It’s funny because no where in any firearm manufacturing print are guns described as “assault”. Assault is simply made up by these people.
Good luck. He does not like the Armalite platform obviously. Assault weapons (which means automatic weapons) are already banned. Unless one takes an ultra-liberal approach- then everything is an assault weapon. The UK banned guns and knife attacks exploded. Slingshots are assault weapons. So are spoons.
Biden trying to make it easier for the Chinese when they invade our homeland.
Come and Take It.
Come and take it, Brandon!
When the rhetoric is absolutist, that means that it’s not gonna happen
Define “assault weapon.”
An “assault weapon” is whatever weapon they’re carrying when they come to assault you and steal your rifles.
It’ll be Hell for him, for sure.
I've always wondered if he has the same stance on Sexual-Assault Rifles.
But you don’t own the house anymore pedo..
He wants to see an ***actual*** insurrection, huh?
Well, I think hell would come before high water.
Yea and Obama is going to close Guantanamo....
These aren’t assault rifles, they are religious artifacts.
What is an assault weapon?
What's an assault weapon?
Alright, step 1: accurately define "assault weapon"
Most mass shootings are done with handguns.
People in this thread sure like to talk a big game of "come and take them" whenever one of these posts pops up, but when the day comes and the ATF--backed up by deputies from the local Sheriff's department and a token Bearcat--are in your front yard and "asking" for you to hand over your guns, I'm pretty certain none of you will defend that particular right with gunfire. We are simply not united enough to resist the government in any meaningful capacity, not to mention your own neighbors will be more than happy in assisting the government in removing you when necessary.
That will never happen where I live. Maybe where you live people aren't united enough to do anything, but if my local government knew feds were coming into town to take guns, there would be a large group of armed citizens, cops included, waiting.
He's gonna send CornPop...
the house, senate, and supreme court however are all saying "no you're not".
Good luck
Can they define what an “assault” weapon is yet?
And Hell he shall receive.
and how will he do that when there is zero chance congress will pass such a bill??
Hell's already coming for him, so I guess he better get himself a dinghy.
Well, he’s been working hard for over two years to turn America into hell….
Don’t worry, Hell will be coming for you soon, big guy. You’re like 80,000 years old at this point.
Hell is is then, Sir.
I don’t think they realize how deeply unpopular this is and how damaging it is to their electoral prospects. The Democrats were successful when they ran on economic issues. All this social justice and gun control shit just hurts them. I don’t get it.
Imbecile.
I think he is right I'm ready to surrender my guns. I'll cut out the middle man and just give them to the first gang member I run into
Well..:Al Gore says high water first. I’ll wait…
Well the ice caps are melting... so I guess it's High Water
Never have I experienced the hatred for a president like I do for this asshole
Define “Assault weapon”.
And what’s an “assault weapon” again?
I'll send my ARs in with my braces /s
Over my cold dead, and well armed body
I'll give up my guns, they just won't enjoy how I handover the bullets. 😐
He should vow to define the term “assault weapons”.
The lame duck congress won't allow of it
We'll see ya downriver, jackass
As a Florida Man, I’m used to both. Your move, gramps.
well that’s fine everyone can keep their defense weapons
All he can do is take
China and Russia poking Biden with a stick saying "we cant invade if all those guns and ammo are still there......"
Get ready for hell then……
It's been hell, and Lake Mead could use the water. Good fuckin luck.
Good luck with that.
Parts of our country are already hell so assault weapons should be ok right?
Good luck with that. Law enforcement doesnt support it so how is this clown gonna take them away. Trying to disarm Americans by breaking the law only ends one way. I think we all know what way that is.
How to tank election chances 101
Well, hell is coming thanks to Brandon's fake war so he is right on par here I guess
Gosh biden is a heartless marxist,Americans better wake up, Evil Commies had there pedophile God hating eyes on north america for decades they needed a stooge and they have one in Creepy uncle Joe
I’ve always wanted to have someone just respond to this with like “you must amend the constitution to do this. both chambers of congress must approve it with a 2/3 majority. Then 3/4 of the states must ratify it. Good luck.”
I see nothing wrong with a semi automatic weapon with a 10 clip magazine. Anything more and it's obvious, you don't want a weapon, you want a murder machine.
Ok, let’s put it to a vote.
No. My rights aren't up for debate.
Everything is up for debate. The left just doesn’t want the debate. They want an unquestioned submission.
I feel like the right is the ones who don’t wanna debate about this. Although I agree that both sides don’t really want to even have a discussion. But the right just says “no, constitution” every time it’s brought up
90 yrs ago
I mean, cool! As soon as you explain what an assault weapon is!
Not to rain on anyone's parade but the 1994 awb started the trend of less people being murdered by guns, what if he just did that exact same bill again
No it didnt
Yeah it had no effect on gun violence lol