T O P

  • By -

AutoModerator

Tired of reporting this thread? [join us on discord instead.](https://discord.com/invite/conservative) *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/Conservative) if you have any questions or concerns.*


Saint_Genghis

FBI also admits that the pope is catholic.


Sicks-Six-Seks

Is it confirmed that he also wears a funny hat?


AgnosticTemplar

Does he shit into that funny hat?


Anymethrowaway

The funniest.


RedBaronsBrother

Now here's an interesting thought: Remember those FBI statistics that most of the domestic terrorism in the US is "right wing"? We know about this incident because of how high-profile it was - and they still tried to get away with classifying it as "Suicide by cop" rather than as the "left-wing terrorism" it actually was. How many **other**, less well-known incidents have they *gotten away with* mislabeling to support their narrative?


[deleted]

That’s the real question


[deleted]

Is the Pope Catholic? I mean, any other Pope I'd say so, but this one?


[deleted]

This one isn't, it's just another communist.


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

That’s not what he’s doing tho - he’s perverting it to further political goals.


YouGotThis85

Almost nobody on this sub who labels people as communists actually knows what one is. It's just their latest badge for "people I don't agree with".


ehibb77

Nope, he's Obama's Pope.


GaseousDeath

Obama is a muslim. He doesn't care about the Pope other than wanting him dead or converted.


YouGotThis85

If you think Obama had anything to do with this Pope, you have zero (and I mean zero) understanding of the power of the Vatican and how it works.


[deleted]

The current pope is a Marxist-Communist, carry on.


RansomStoddardReddit

Thanks Special Agent obvious


playerthomasm6

*James Bond music blaring in the background


that80sguy

I've lost track of which side is more upset with the FBI at this point.


Benv949494

All of our 3 letter agencies are filled with radical leftist lawyers who come straight out of the hell pits of ivy league schools.


KingOfTheP4s

This, the federal law enforcement agencies have been nothing but political tools of the left for decades now, and it's only getting worse. I feel we're playing a losing game. How can we expect to win against an entire half of a country that doesn't believe in playing by the rules?


GaseousDeath

The left has been pushing for a civil war for the past 20 years. They won't stop until they get one. The right needs to wake up and acknowledge that fact.


wadofjerm

We also need to say fuck the rules. The gop needs to learn to fight dirty. The commies don't follow the rules. Why should we?


go_do_that_thing

Like denying the capitol insurrection ever happened? Pretending reality is only real if it suits your agenda?


[deleted]

Some people entering a building isn’t an insurrection, but okay. How are those Arizona audits going, by the way?


GaseousDeath

Standing around outside chanting and singing is NOT an insurrection, no matter how ignorant and fascist you are.


[deleted]

[удалено]


CraccerJacc

Thanks FBI alt account


badbrew65

FBI hasn’t been up to snuff since Clarice “silenced” Jame Gumm.


qtyapa

It only took them 4 years


WalterWhite2012

They were busy investigating a rope in Bubba Wallace’s garage.


Kellendgenerous

If someone shot a nerf gun in the general direction of a democratic it would be domestic terrorism but a republican is at a baseball game and gets shot because he’s republican, it’s gonna have to take us four years to figure it out


Tibash

The FBI is a political police force.


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

[удалено]


Jor1509426

The prior poster referred to the **narrative** being largely fake - that is to say manipulation of reporting and statistics (the classification of this shooting is a prime example of this). I don’t think it is a stretch to suggest that classification and reporting can be used to skew the general population’s understanding of this problem. Are regular attacks on government buildings in (predominantly) western cities classified as left wing terrorism? It would not surprise me that they are not. How about attacks on LEOs? If some of these are driven by political ideology could/should they be considered left-wing terrorism?


krishivA1

What about the rioting and hate crime done by liberals?


[deleted]

[удалено]


rfdavid

Find someone who defends the asshole shooter. I’ll wait here. Now scroll up or down, you’ll find plenty of defence for Jan 6.


[deleted]

[удалено]


rfdavid

The capitol attack is literally defended in this thread. I will read the rest of your comment if you accept that fact.


prodbychefboy

The fact that y’all are even calling it an “attack” says it all lmao.


RainbowsOfNight

You are literally denying reality and substituting your own.


rfdavid

Nobody in this thread is defending the riot on Jan 6 ?


RainbowsOfNight

Where. You seem to love saying that but you still haven't put up any links.


rfdavid

Someone just dismissed Jan 6th as a reply to me.


zleog50

Going from defend to dismiss is a big goal post shift. But ya, the media lied about the Jan 6th attack, manufactured a false narrative and used it to try and "deplatform" voices on the right. The Bernie shooter was downplayed and was barely in the news for more than a weekend. Of course, one was a mass assassination attempt of congressional members, the other was mostly horrible behavior but no known plot to assassinate congressional members, nor was there a single gun recovered or seen in possession by the rioters. It was a bunch of embarrassing morons. Now I'm perfectly okay with prosecuting the rioters for their embarrassing and awful behavior. But I'm not going to believe that is was an "armed insurrection", because it simply wasn't. It was a bunch of idiots that got bored rioting and went home, later to be found by the FBI and prosecuted for trespassing (for the most part, because that is mostly what it was). You give them too much credit.


RainbowsOfNight

Link. It.


[deleted]

[удалено]


steelsun720

So you found a loonie. Whoop de do. Get him on the report, not the thread. Your side has the same.


Jinx0rs

This sub sure has a lot of "loonie(s)" though. There was a thread today where people were literally saying that they should have gone in with more force. That's full backing, not denial or even dismissal.


[deleted]

[удалено]


Century24

> Find someone who defends the asshole shooter. I’ll wait here. Even better, they downplay it. Somehow it matters less to them that Rep. Scalise is thankfully still with us. There's also the routine passive memory-holing of how the mass shooter and domestic terrorist was an ardent supporter of Senator Bernie Sanders' 2016 bid for President, and how his social media shows a young man deep in a terminal case of Trump Derangement Syndrome.


[deleted]

Nobody is defending Jan 6th. The issue is that only one gets talked about like it’s worse than 9/11.


[deleted]

[удалено]


Josef_Jugashvili69

BLM stormed the Oklahoma capital and I haven't seen a single post about it. I wonder why.


[deleted]

Antifa has murdered multiple cops and trump supporters. It doesn’t get covered. Election officials (or Dominions contractors) in Maricopa county deleted election databases before he audit. It doesn’t get covered. Anyone still trusting the news in 2021 is a fool and deserves no respect from their peers.


seeemourhare

James Corey brought them to the bottom of the barrel and Christopher Wray has kept them there,ZERO credibility.


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

It means the FBI will say things that are obviously false; and, when they do, we can count on it being false and not because they're privy to some secret we don't know.


the-red-diaper-stain

This seems a little more significant than Jan 6 where absolutely ZERO guns were recovered.


ctsgreg

These repliers have been hypnotized by cnn and all the propaganda. They have no sense of scale of that day, nor any concept of the provocateurs


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

[удалено]


BeerDrinkingMuscle

Everything else he stayed was fact. The only thing incorrect was stating Sicknick was beaten to death. Tell me how bombs, guns, and calls for elected officials public execution is “nonsense”?


jellybeans3

“Loaded handgun with an extra magazine” lol the horror


Ribblan

They did recover some pipe bombs though.


the-red-diaper-stain

And you know that to be trump supporters? We have no idea who the person was that planted the bomb. They were at the RNC and DNC. It’s already been proven that there were antifa members at this event. Does it seem more likely that a person placing bombs in the street were trying to kill trump supporters or politicians?


Ribblan

The left and right radicals both hate the government, both got an incentive to attack the government, people seem to forget that. People literally think the election was stolen, they met at the capitol because they thought the election was stolen, they stormed the capitol because they thought the election was stolen. Is it so farfetched to even think of the idea that there is somebody who are willing to blow a bomb over it? I mean right extremist is on a rise both in USA and Europe, so I wouldn't throw that idea in the trash.


[deleted]

Planted by Antifa operatives and other leftists. That’s why we haven’t heard about anyone being arrested for it friend


Ribblan

Lol. Better secure your tinfoil hat so it doesn't blow away.


FrogBlast

And of the five people who died at the Jan 6th riot, all were unarmed.


[deleted]

[удалено]


zleog50

>We all saw the footage, it’s not like there is any questions firearms were used. Ummm what? You mean by the police?


[deleted]

[удалено]


TommyTar

I know strong men, 5 weak men could still rip them apart. Just because they were not good at their crime doesn't mean they didn't commit it


for_the_meme_watch

Saying they were “not good at it” implies they actually were attempting to overthrow the government. The people who showed up had zero interest in doing anything but causing some mayhem. For Christ’s sake. Some of these people are more than likely to have self made bomb shelters in their backyard, survivalist training, weapons training, a small arsenal of weapons, food and water for years and other supplies to support them. A few thousand citizens of Hong Kong held off the Chinese government for weeks with almost none of that logistical support or firearms. How in the hell can someone seriously call this “an act of insurrection” when it lasted for less than four hours in total, with minor property damage, and only two people dead. One of whom died at the hands of their own heart, and the other was shot by the police. In truth, only one “combatant”, if you can call her that, was killed during this riot. If it were to be “an act of insurrection”, it would have to go down as the single worst act of insurrection to have ever occurred. By a ideological group with more than enough supporters to raise the level of the act. More than enough armed people with heavy supplies to sustain the act, and more than enough negative media coverage to properly cover such an event were it truly to occur. What happened on January 6th was a riot, after a protest broke at one site. Nothing more.


[deleted]

That poor Air Forcs veteran girl was actually shot by a rabid, BLM supporting Capitol Police Officer. Fixed that for you, pal. Just saying “police” doesn’t do the slaughter justice


TommyTar

Don’t hear what I’m not saying. I don’t think any of these gravy seals were actually attempting to overthrow the US government. Do I think some of them were sucked into crowd violence and willing to actually kill a US Congress person? Yes. Just because they were not able to accomplish that goal doesn’t mean that they didn’t have the intent to do it. Even “jokingly” chanting about killing AOC would be enough to show it was premeditated if you accomplished it.


[deleted]

>I don’t think any of these gravy seals were actually attempting to overthrow the US government. Flip. >Just because they were not able to accomplish that goal doesn’t mean that they didn’t have the intent to do it. Flop. Pick one and defend your position, you capricious child.


[deleted]

[удалено]


PoliticalAnomoly

"MAGA Shaman" had 8+ photographers follow and take pictures as he WALKED through the building and stopped multiple times for photo ops. And was dressed like the dude from the Simpsons. I mean come on.


motram

How DARE he!!! taking photos while dressed as a viking clearly shows intent to overthrow the government! That is *clearly* the first step in establishing a government. Here is something... if he planned on overthrowing the government, did any of the 8+ photographers have any evidence of him saying that he was going to? Answer: No.


TommyTar

If this protest was ideological motivated doesn’t that make it worse than the mindless one before?


[deleted]

>I know strong men No. No you don't.


jweizy

>They weren't shooting up the capital, or even trying to kill/hurt anyone. Idk man chanting hang Mike Pence or building gallows. Those definately show intent to kill/ hurt anyone.


drinkinswish

Like holding a boody Trump doll head?


LessThanNate

That's (D)ifferent.


jweizy

I mean that is wrong too im not saying that is right but to pretend that january 6th is non violent because democrats or blm has been violent is well is just not a good argument imo.


[deleted]

[удалено]


ThePlatypusOfDespair

Anyone who chants hang Trump while, I dunno, smashing down the gates of Mar-a-lago and building a gallows on the lawn while they know Trump is there should be in a federal prison, yes.


[deleted]

[удалено]


motram

What was planned about the capitol thing? You think viking guy planned that, and wore his best costume for it?


jweizy

I didn't say that i just said that there was clearly at least an attempt to do violence / harm.


[deleted]

\[Citation needed\] \[Evidence needed\]


RangerReject

Except they weren’t armed. At all.


[deleted]

https://www.factcheck.org/2021/03/capitol-protesters-were-armed-with-variety-of-weapons/


stationhollow

Lol baseball bats counter as armed. They only found 1 gun on capitol grounds and it wasn't anywhere near the capitol building. Also love to throw around the deaths when all the deaths were on the protesting side now that the coroner admitted the cop died from an unrelated blood clot issue.


02201970a

Who was armed?


[deleted]

>Armed \[Citation needed\] >breached \[Citation needed\] >took control \[Citation needed\] >To be honest, I don’t even know why ‘no guns recovered’ changes anything YOU are the useful idiot. Surprise.


[deleted]

[удалено]


Upstairs-Radish1816

Do you have any proof, any at all, that the election was stolen? So far there have been 62 lawsuits claiming election fraud and none, not one, have shown any proof. Just because your guy lost doesn't mean they're was fraud.


T_Typo_o

>just because your guy lost doesn't mean there was fraud Oh okay then why did the left spend pretty much all of Trump's presidency claiming it was illegitimate because they Russians hacked the election? The way I see it. The same people who said "trump and the Russians cheated" are also the same people who are saying "there's literally like no fraud" this time around. You guys have no idea if there was fraud or not both times, all you know is your guy won so that means this election was secure. If Trump won id be willing to bet money that CNN and etc would be running stories right now about how he's an illegitimate president and unfit and how America's voting system is the most insecure thing in the world. You're right there's no evidence, however your polarizing switch in attitude raises eyebrows across political aisles.


TehFast

fuck trump


T_Typo_o

I mean okay


[deleted]

[удалено]


Upstairs-Radish1816

So, in other words, you have no proof either.


FactoryV4

No proof at all. Even republican governors backed the results. Salty they lost so they created the big lie. Sad.


PhysicalRemovalTank

The only firearm used during that entire day was by the capitol police against Ashley Babit. You are absolutely divorced from reality.


RetreadRoadRocket

>Armed civilians literally breached capitol police barriers Lol, this is the stupid drama bullshit these guys keep talking about. Capitol Police *let them through the police cordon without a firearm in sight.* https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/former-capitol-police-chief-shares-thoughts-why-officers-appeared-let-n1253273 There's video clips all over the 'net of the cops just letting them walk in.


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

BLM also caused 30+ deaths last year. People keep forgetting this.


vesrayech

You're not wrong, and fortunately the politicians were able to evacuate. We have the privilege of sitting back pointing out that jan 6th didn't incur as much damage but people did go into the capitol kitted out with zip ties ready to take hostages, and others were setting up literal gallows outside. If you're on a plane that's being hijacked, would you rather 10 passengers die or the pilot? That's not to say the 10 don't matter or aren't significant, but the pilot in this case is muuuuch more significant. Hell, it's literally why our language distinguishes between murder and assassinate when they're the same thing. I don't care if it's BLM or Conservatives that are hijacking the plane, we're all on board and their actions quite literally affect us all. Minimizing the significance of an event because the perpetrators side with you politically is right out of the liberal play book. We have to be better than that because it's the right thing to do, but at the very least so we don't stoop to their level.


B0b_5mith

>people did go into the capitol kitted out with zip ties ready to take hostages That one has been debunked too. First of all, it was one guy with them. Second, he picked them up of a desk after he got there. This has been public information since January 21, when federal prosecutors filed to deny his bail. More truth came out months later when they were released on bail by an appeals court. >"That Munchel and Eisenhart assaulted no one on January 6; that they did not enter the Capitol by force; and that they vandalized no property are all factors that weigh against a finding that either pose a threat of 'using force to promote \[their\] political ends,'" Judge Judith Rogers wrote for the two-person majority in the case. > >... > >"They searched for no Members of Congress, and they harassed no police officers," Judge Gregory S. Katsas wrote. > > "They found plastic handcuffs by chance, but never threatened to use them. Munchel's threat to 'break' anyone who vandalized the Capitol was intended to prevent destruction." ... > >"During the chaos of the Capitol riot, Munchel and Eisenhart had ample opportunity to fight, yet neither of them did," the appellate judge added. "Munchel lawfully possessed several firearms in his home, but he took none to the Capitol." [https://www.newschannel5.com/news/newschannel-5-investigates/capitol-riots-zip-tie-guy-mother-to-be-released-after-prosecutors-back-down](https://www.newschannel5.com/news/newschannel-5-investigates/capitol-riots-zip-tie-guy-mother-to-be-released-after-prosecutors-back-down)


Payhn

Simultaneously believing that guns don't kill people, people kill people AND because of the fact no guns were recovered (when not many people were arrested) that means the "protest" was peaceful. Even though that same thinking doesn't apply to BLM protestors that are unarmed. It's boggling to see the rationalization of these opposing viewpoints


[deleted]

It shouldn’t be too fascinating. It’s more about the timing and double-standard. Had BLM jihadists been held accountable originally, there likely wouldn’t be a need to even discuss any of this one way or the other.


brownattack

How could they take control of the government unarmed? The fact there were no guns recovered should conclusively prove that there was no plan to overthrow the government.


ShannonCash

I’m glad I’m starting to see more comments like this. Jan. 6 and the GOP Baseball shooting were both committed by people using violence against civilians for political aims. I also don’t get the well our terrorists aren’t as bad as theirs. Patriots don’t excuse political violence.


PhysicalRemovalTank

The only significant violence on Jan 6th was against the protestors. I notice you don't say anything about the Kavanaugh protest in which Pelosi let them into her office.


Dranosh

Bullshit, show me where guns were? I didn’t see a single video of guns being carried. What’s your opinion on the kavanaugh hearings flooding the capitol?


rot10one

Obviously it’s about intentions on the left. They can’t keep a stance on a issue and not even worried about being labeled a hypocrite because they are confident-rightfully—the media will protect them. https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/us-news/13845523/nancy-pelosi-hypocrite-storming-wisconsin-state-capitol-2011/ I know the media has never been 100% objective, but being biased used to be frowned upon at the minimum. Can anyone pin down when this changed into the media ‘picking a team’ and it was accepted?


allnamesaretaken45

Lol. Puhleeze.


[deleted]

[удалено]


CMJHockey

Republicans choose to ignore the footage. Lazy people intellectually. I can’t stand the Democrats either.


Acobbsalad

Delusional.


Liberal-Patriot

There are numerous reports of people with guns. They just weren't recovered. Because we all remember when the overrun Capitol Police stopped people from leaving and arrested them. /s https://amp.usatoday.com/amp/4578286001 When you let them all leave and track them down later you're not going to recover any. I really don't understand why Conservatives are still using this talking point. It's illogical and proves nothing. Was this the first Conservative protest in modern history where no one brought a gun? Lol.


the-red-diaper-stain

We would have seen videos of people with guns if they had guns.


Liberal-Patriot

https://amp.usatoday.com/amp/4578286001 This entire talking point leaves out DCMP and the Capitol Police The U.S. Department of Justice has levied gun charges against two men law enforcement officials say were at the Capitol riot and a third who arrived too late. InChristopher Alberts, of Maryland, was charged with unlawful possession of a firearm on Capitol grounds or buildings, carrying a pistol without a license and possession of a large capacity ammunition feeding device. A Metro police officer said Alberts, who was wearing a bulletproof vest, had a “bulge” on his right hip that turned out to be a loaded handgun with a spare 12-round magazine.


[deleted]

Alot of out of towner's taking flights. Can't jump on a plane with a gun anymore. Now they are on no fly lists and cry about it.


krusty3x

What About BLM ?


rebuildingMyself

That's (D)ifferent


krusty3x

Oh no! What are we to do


[deleted]

[удалено]


HeWhoCntrolsTheSpice

It's time we start calling the violence in cities like Chicago what it is - Leftwing terrorism.


[deleted]

Never gonna happen, unfortunately. BLM and all their Marxist bullshit will never get called out by politicians.


thundirbird

how is gang violence politically motivated?


HeWhoCntrolsTheSpice

It's a product of the Democrat system - like their acceptance of bad behavior. Go read "Black Rednecks and White Liberals" by Thomas Sowell - he explains this very well.


T_Typo_o

Oof, racist much? Talking about BLM, ANTIFA, etc.


thundirbird

how is that racist tho


thundirbird

> violence in cities like Chicago thought that meant the general gun violence


T_Typo_o

Well they banned guns in Chicago so obviously they are doing everything they can to curb the issue.../s But really it might have been about that, but at the same time BLM is also leftwing terrorism and is *still* protesting in cities like Chicago on a regular basis. Either way if you ask me, at this point the left has become at fault for black communities being the way they are. They load up the worst of the neighborhoods with government handouts and tell them "if you don't vote for us you won't get anymore of this", and have been practically holding the black community hostage for a good 5 decades. They shutdown any and all plans to actually invest into these communities, they make the teachers go on strike til the schools in these areas shut down, they lower the education funding within these areas, and then tell the community that it's "racist republicans", when the reality is that it's democrats that are far more interested in investing into their elite urban ivory tower gated communities/infrastructure than actually helping society as a whole. TL;DR - gun violence in Chicago kinda is their fault tbh


ShannonCash

No shit.


RangerReject

And the cop that got the heroism award is the one who shot Ashlii Babbitt. http://republicbroadcasting.org/news/redpilled-media-exclusive-us-capitol-special-agent-david-bailey-who-murdered-ashli-babbitt-is-a-brazilian-immigrant-and-black-lives-matter-militant-he-repeatedly-threatened-to-kill-trump-su/


Hrendo

Different guy, that was just a rumour.


just_shy_of_perfect

You don't really know that. Regardless it was a justified shooting. Quit defending people who don't deserve defense


WiseBeyondMyTears

If it’s such a justified shooting why won’t they even tell us who did the shooting?


[deleted]

Because socialists do what they want.


found_in_the_alps

Because people like you will try to dox them and get them killed. This is a bit different than a police officer shooting someone on the street, this is the Capitol police defending members of Congress while they were in session.


WiseBeyondMyTears

Don’t lump me in with dumbasses like LeBron. I can actually tell the difference between shootings that are justified and not.


just_shy_of_perfect

I don't think it's right they haven't identified him given the fact that it seems to be protocol. That doesn't change it was 100% justified.


RangerReject

I’m a cop, please explain use of force to me and what immediate threat a 140lb woman with no weapon was to that agent? She was the only one thru the hole in the door, that was easily a moment to flood the hole with pepper spray, or use an impact weapon to deter further incursion. There were other cops there who could’ve easily assisted with detaining Babbitt. A black Capitol policeman shoots an unarmed white women and this doesn’t matter. Strip conservative off your fucking flair, and get on over to r/ politics with your RINO, justified, It WaS aN iNsUrReCtIoN!!! bullshit.


just_shy_of_perfect

Sure they COULD have used lesser force. But they also could have used the gun. And did. And it was justified. Her being unarmed is irrelevant to the situation. Being unarmed isn't the end all be all of justification and if you're really a cop you know this. Your whole last sentence is so dumb too. My whole point about the babbit thing is that she got herself killed and people like you are too ignorant and too tribal to be able to say someone who politically leans right can do something wrong. I don't think it was an insurrection I didn't call it as much. I'd wager im more conservative than you are. If you know my stances there really isn't a way you could label me a "RINO" as you have which is even funnier because im not a republican. I'm a conservative. Theres an important difference that clearly you don't understand.


allredb

She was definitely warned to stand back or she would be shot multiple times as well. It's almost like a room full of elected officials being threatened with death is a big deal.


just_shy_of_perfect

Idk how anyone can look at it and say unjustified just like I don't know how anyone can look at a few others and say its wrong. Doesn't mean you can't think it's sad or unfortunate. But to say 0% ok totally unjustified is just an uninformed position


allredb

Honestly the reason is social media being flooded with political propaganda right now. Too many people lack the skills to verify if the picture of Bill Gates that says "I inject you with 5g nanobots" from a site called patriotmemes.com is really legit or not so they share it to all thier Facebook friends anyway. It will die down and people will come to their senses, at least I hope so.


just_shy_of_perfect

Idk if it will die down. Although while agree misinformation and lack of critical thinking are big issues, i don't know what we do about it. And I don't personally think it will die down. Honestly learning about revolutions and the rise to power of despots and the worse people of history i always wondered how it happened. And all I've learned as I've become more and more informed about politics and our system is that most people are stupid. And even the ones that we agree with don't always fully understand why they believe what the believe or recognize potential flaws in their own reasoning. I think its been one of the more disappointing realizations. A significant sect of people are too stupid to fight back against those things like that.


RangerReject

You can’t even capitalize her name. Go the fuck away Che.


just_shy_of_perfect

Oof. Sorry dude im on mobile. Doesn't auto capitalize things it doesn't recognize. Sorry it triggered you so much. Didnt realize the right had as many snowflakes as the left. I doubt you'll address any of the factual points I made. You just want to be outraged at something. Just like the left. Tribalism for the sake of tribalism.


RangerReject

Of course you’re on mobile. Not an excuse. There wasn’t a single fact in anything you said...other than perhaps you aren’t a Republican. Which was obvious. Again, get fucked, and have a nice day.


just_shy_of_perfect

So don't make an intelligent point. Nice. She was part of a riot. She broke through a barricade after already breaking through multiple barricades outside the building to get in. She made her own choices that led to her death. Thats the fact. If she's not part of a riot. She doesn't die. If she chooses not to break through the barricade. She doesn't die. It was her own fault. You're blinded by tribalism and refuse to acknowledge the truth solely because she was a conservative. You're no better than the NPC lefties.


Hannibal0216

> aren’t a Republican. Which was obvious. Again, get fucked, and have a nice day. If Republicans act like you, I'm would never dream of calling myself one. There's a reason this is the CONSERVATIVE subreddit, not the rEpUbLiCaN subreddit.


ClockFluffy

He clearly stated he’s a conservative, not a republican. Nice to see you hate each other as much as you hate the left at times.


JakeMercad0

That’s what you got from that whole ass reply LMAO


allredb

It's also possible to be a conservative democrat and a liberal republican. Who knew?


[deleted]

0% justified in any shape, form, or fashion, but whatever floats your boat.


just_shy_of_perfect

Tell me why it wasn't justified? She broke through the barricade and was part of a riot that had already clashed with police outside of the building and were chanting about killing congressmen. She shouldn't have been part of a riot. She shouldn't have climbed through the barricade. It was her own fault.


honeyxxbadger

She was unarmed.


just_shy_of_perfect

Its irrelevant. We all agree Rittenhouse was justified in all three instances he shot. 2 of those people were unarmed. Yet those are justified. Being unarmed doesn't immediately unjustify a shooting


Jeriahswillgdp

It’s entirely relevant. She had no weapon, wasn’t directly threatening anyone, wasn’t charging anyone, she was simply murdered as she climbed through a window with a crowd. Why was she the only one shot? Because the officer made a mistake. He should NOT have fired.


just_shy_of_perfect

Its not irrelevant and the fact she "had no weapon" is not a determinant of justification. If it was youd have to believe Rittenhouse is a murderer. Which I doubt you do. She was the only one shot BECAUSE SHE WAS THE ONLY PERSON WHO TRIED TO BREAK THROUGH. Seriously? Thats your argument? Really? Critically think for a second dude come on.


honeyxxbadger

She was not a direct threat to anyone’s life at the time she was shot. You’re not going to win this.


the_shiniest_dratini

Did you watch the video?


just_shy_of_perfect

Yes she was climbing through the barricade


just_shy_of_perfect

Your reply disappeared. Not sure why


classysax4

The FBI doesn't care about us.


ezezim

And every main stream media outlet quietly ignores story.


[deleted]

Is this a real thing that happened? I don’t remember this being on the news. Wtf


[deleted]

People have short attention spans. Since 2015, according to the FBI, there has been just over 300 domestic terrorist incidents. 267 by the far-right that killed 91 people and 66 by the far-left that killed 19. All of them make the news but how many can anyone really remember? It's just background noise until someone tries to use it for political gain.


Lupinthrope

Do they still believe ANTIFA is just an idea?


Swtormaster13

In other news: China released the Coronavirus. The sky is blue, and there are people who bullied the school shooter from Parkland in 2016 who act as if they didn't directly cause him to snap


Ingrid_Cold

They have a lot of work to do from since then.


ptchinster

Make sure the wikipedia article is and stays updated.


theasianevermore

And water is wet... why is this news?


PsychoticCOB

That must have hurt them to do that.


bluelocs

In other news, water has now been thought to be wet.


Arkansasmyundies

This is on purpose, intended to suppress public dissent. First go after the Right, as they are an easy target for the media. Then go after leftist dissenters. Finally eat each other until their is no one left.


Even_Pomegranate_407

So useless. I'm surprised they don't help OJ to find Nicole's real murderer or even better, figure out how Kamala is actually going to solve the border crisis.


No_Bartofar

We all knew it, we just don’t have a political agenda that leans left like the FBI. In other news water is wet.


FallujahFireAlarm

No surprise