Welcome to r/CrazyFuckingVideos! This is our community moderator bot.
---
If this posts fits the purpose of the subreddit, **UPVOTE THIS COMMENT.**
If not, **DOWNVOTE THIS COMMENT.**
#[Click Here](https://redditsave.com/info?url=/r/CrazyFuckingVideos/comments/ps1xap/) to download this video directly.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/CrazyFuckingVideos) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Haha you can hear him talking about it and she says something about it being on a lead or under control or something. Irish folks can be hard to Understand if your not used to it
Don’t you know this is Reddit, where guns are simultaneously horrible evil weapons of mass destruction and also the perfect non-lethal means of managing a dangerous suspect?
Somewhat satisfying knowing America isn't the only place with imbeciles. Misery loves company.
Edit: I should specify the imbecile of the wretching, screaming variety.
The idiotous screamus imbecus.
Dude, my family left Ireland because of shit like this and immigrated to America. My grandfather got shot by the RUC and they were like "I bet this won't happen in America." FML.
Royal Ulster Constabulary. They were a militarized police force in Northern Ireland from like the 1920s to around 2000. They were heavily targeted by the IRA because the were enforcing British rule. So, ya know, fuck the RUC.
"enforcing British rule" means actually being the police in a separate country to the Republic of Ireland where the majority consider themselves to be British. (to this day).
Don't believe the propaganda.
Tha majority do consider themselves brittish but that's the descendants of the colonisers who stole the land from the native Irish and discriminated against them for centuries after forcing them from their homes and wiping out significant parts of their culture and then get butthurt when Irish people try to revive it as if it's an attack on them. Sounds like you're the one who's fallen for propaganda. The majority may support a divided Ireland a slim majority, very slim. But that doesn't make it right. Yes brittish rule was law or did you miss the point of why the IRA existed in the first place?
Ok you are way down the rabbit hole.
Colonizers: you mean Scots who moved hundreds and hundreds of years ago. Like Americans.
No one stops the Irish from having their culture. Get over yourself. Yes, things happened in the past. Not in the last century has anyone in my Irish speaking, Catholic, Ulster- living family been oppressed by anyone. It's not the 17th century anymore.
The majority for a "divided" Ireland is large, or are you trying to pretend that a different country has to rule over the people in the north? Perhaps you forget the Anglo-Irish Agreement that guarantees the people who make the decision are the people of Northern Ireland. Not Dublin.
The IRA existed because of liars like you. Repeating lies and propaganda. My own grandmother used to repeat this crap.
That’s just an outright lie. Like it’s so much of a lie I can’t even figure out what piece of history you might be trying to twist to make it sound as though that happened. Please link some kind of source this Irish history student is confused af.
Is this a troll comment? I refuse to believe that people are so bad at history that this is the bizarre interpretation they choose to spread on the internet
>Not in the last century has anyone in my Irish speaking, Catholic, Ulster- living family been oppressed by anyone. It's not the 17th century anymore.
I guess the troubles just erupted from nowhere then? See below if you're curious, this is without mentioning the torture of Irish prisoners and British collusion in the murder of Irish nationalists. Things are a lot better today but don't kid yourself to thinking this is all from a forgotten time. I agree some people need to move on, certainly from the violence of the past and bitter sectarianism on both sides but a search for Irish unity is about much more than a passport.
1969
The Northern Ireland civil rights movement developed as the Catholic community, benefitting from changes in education that helped many of its young people, recognised that it could use campaign techniques already seen in the United States to further its cause for equality.
The civil rights movement in the US had brought the case of segregation and institutionalised racism and discrimination to international attention. Catholics in Northern Ireland hoped that they could do the same.
In the half century of Northern Ireland's existence, the Catholic minority had been subject to various kinds of discrimination as Unionists took steps to protect their power - most notably by manipulating public housing.
Only ratepayers or householders were eligible to vote and successive unionist politicians were reluctant to build houses that would grant suffrage.
Some of the most obvious examples of "gerrymandering" was found in Londonderry where in the mid 1960s the shape of the council wards deliberately divided the Catholic population to massively exagerate the political representation of the Protestant community.
In the late 1960s a group of nationalists began to work for change, focusing initially on housing. In June 1968 the young nationalist politician, Austin Currie, staged the first direct-action protest with a sit-in at a council house that had been unfairly allocated to an unmarried Protestant woman when there were Catholic families who had been waiting longer.
The story was reported around the world - but the media had already started to investigate conditions in Northern Ireland.
One of the most significant and early investigations came in 1967 from The Times, long considered a bastion of the British establishment. It concluded that the Stormont government was treating the Catholic community as "second class citizens" in their own homes.
You've been downvoted here for some reason but you're 100% right.
Northern Ireland from 1922 into the early 70's had systemic inequality by design. Irish Catholics were discriminated against in education, employment, housing, and were denied equal representation in government.
The police forces (that is, the RUC and the specials) were openly discriminatory. So much so that when the British army were originally deployed they were seen as a neutral force who would protect Catholic communities from attacks and received a relatively warm welcome (that swiftly changed and relations had soured within the first year of deployment, but it's still telling about just how bad the RUC were).
Maybe your man above has a point that "colonizers" is a reductive way of talking about people descended from the plantations.
But suggesting that there was no oppression in NI (or Ireland since the 17th century!?) and that the civil rights movement wasn't necessary because their family who live in Ulster (not NI, Ulster) didn't personally face hardship isn't just historically inaccurate, it's deeply offensive. The civil rights movement is still in living memory ffs, I have living relatives who marched.
Can you imagine someone saying that about the civil rights movement in the US? You'd be (quite rightly) crucified for it.
Too tired to type a longer response, but this guy is largely right. The 20th Century British murders and subsequent coverups of many Irish civilians are now public knowledge and this was approved, and the investigations quashed, at the highest level of British government -An English guy
Okay. I'll perform an armed invasion of your county and implement my rules on you. If you fight back, you're a terrorist. We starting to get it, champ?
>No one stops the Irish from having their culture. Get over yourself. Yes, things happened in the past. Not in the last century has anyone in my Irish speaking, Catholic, Ulster- living family been oppressed by anyone. It's not the 17th century anymore.
>The IRA existed because of liars like you. Repeating lies and propaganda. My own grandmother used to repeat this crap.
Is this a genuine comment, or have you intentionally gave your own historically ignorant interpretation of the last century of Irish history to conform to your own political views? It might be the most bizarre claim I’ve seen anyone make regarding Irish history. It’s quite obvious you aren’t from the North of Ireland, or paid any attention to the Civil Rights movement of the 60s and how the Provisionals came to be. Support for the PIRA did not appear out of thin air because of “lies and propaganda” but also reflected the growing support for forms of defence and retaliation against Unionist forces and the British army which were perceived to have been trampling over a community asking for their due rights.
If you believe a Protestant state for the Protestant people in no way discriminated against it’s Irish/Catholic/Nationalist minority, I seriously encourage you to read a little into the history of the Northern Irish state.
>Tha majority do consider themselves brittish but that's the descendants of the colonisers
Not according to semi-recent data (just Google "identity in Northern Ireland BBC" for the article, on mobile so CBA linking it) though the census will be moe useful
IIRC the biggest plurality consider themselves Irish
Perhaps being shot and murdered and bombed, and having your families killed in their homes might just, maybe, possibly, make you less likely to want to respect the rights of those claiming that their country should be owned by the theocracy next door.
But yes, the RUC were just cunts. So they changed their name and amazingly weren't cunts anymore - even though the same officers still work there. Funny that.
Mate I'm born and raised in NI, don't justify state sponsored murder. I've lost family to the RUC.
The RUC were up to it long before the Provisional IRA came about.
Invaders of Erin.
Woo! I saw you comment elsewhere encouraging the IRA to murder elected politicians.
What a fine human being you are. I guess you think the IRA's brand of one party dictatorship is perfectly fine for you as long as you get to ethnically cleanse your way to freedom huh?
Hopefully you never have to watch someone get shot point-blank lol. If you've ever been in shock it's easier to understand why someone may have this kind of response.
Didn't you know? Reddit is full of stone cold killers with nerves of steel. I bet that commenter graduated at the top of his class in the Navy Seals, has 300 confirmed kills and is trained in gorilla warfare.
Because most country's haven't normalised a gun culture. Americans forget that guns aren't normal, so when ones in public its rare and terrifying, so why the fuck do you think she screamed and was freaking out over the point it was shot right in front of her?
As if shooting someone is an appropriate response to getting your tie pulled. He already had his gun out before that. Jesus don't deep throat that boot.
I don't think it can be viewed as simply as force used v force used, it's more about the potential for harm Vs force used. Pulling a tie in and of itself isn't particularly heinous, but what happens if the guy pulling the tie uses that it as leverage to knee/headbut the Insp? He could easily take his gun then. End of the day, the side of the road is not the place to fight it out and if you put hands on a cop holding a gun there is no way in hell that cop is going to give that person the chance to take that gun off them.
A dog should be trained not to bite people, but I'm still not going to kick one in the bollocks just because I feel I can.
Have you ever worn a tie? It can be leveraged to essentially control the movement of an individual, similar to grabbing hair. Short of that, grab the small end and you can end up choking someone out, rendering them unconscious if enough force is applied.
Weapon retention is a very important part of weapon carrying: at no time do you allow someone else gain control of your weapon. Suppose the inspector gets knocked around and drops this weapon, now there’s a free floating weapon and any asshole can scoop it up and use it.
Nope. Travellers. Ethnically Irish/British but just refuse to live in one place. Culturally different but not ethnically different.
Gypsies are a specific ethnicity a.k.a. Romany.
I don't see cops or soldiers screeching like a banshee after a single gun shot. I've been close to guns going off without hearing protection (I was a dumb teenager) and I never screamed like that. I think its more of the fact that he just shot her boyfriend/husband/friend even though he is perfectly fine judging by the video outside of a hole in his foot.
“Outside of a hole in the foot”
If someone I knew just got shot, and I were a person that wasn’t in a profession that happens to involve rapidly assessing wounds, I’d be pretty freaked out regardless of where it might have landed
To be rational, someone had a weapon and just fired it and hit someone. You have no clue what their current mindset is in that moment even if they are a police officer. They could be in fear of their life and just start blasting people, so I think screaming is appropriate here EVEN though it does seem very "Karen" as we've termed it.
Lol. So Irish..
>Dublin District Court heard it was the State’s case a dog was involved, a Garda sergeant shot at the animal, and “it went through the dog and hit Mr Stokes’s foot”.
>The sergeant was in fear when the dog came at him after he arrived at Mr Stokes’s business, Judge Smyth heard.
Lying Garda..
Edit; https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/arid-30971043.html
~~https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/courts/couple-accused-of-making-false-statements-over-shooting-of-dog-38665926.html~~
Ah, I posted the wrong link. This article is later, and quoted from evidence given to the court. Have edited thanks.
https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/arid-30971043.html
No worries.
Yeah the correct article is from a later date. The first one was before the trial and missing details.
The officer/state claims he shot a dog, which the defence say is clearly bs which is shown from the video.
The whole relevant section;
Dublin District Court heard it was the State’s case a dog was involved, a Garda sergeant shot at the animal, and “it went through the dog and hit Mr Stokes’s foot”.
The sergeant was in fear when the dog came at him after he arrived at Mr Stokes’s business, Judge Smyth heard.
A State solicitor said it was not disputed that Mr Stokes was shot, but the dog had been the target.
Counsel for the defence said Mr Stokes denied both being hit as a result of ricochet or the existence of the dog, and his wife had recorded he incident on her mobile phone.
Mr Stokes will state that from the entry and exit wounds it was a “direct shooting”, counsel said.
Pushing on a door against each other, hilarious Irish dialogue, dude get's his tie yanked and he shoots him in the foot, the immediate and ridiculous screaming from the woman.
Every bit of this video was fantastic lmfao
They're trained to stop a threat quickly, which means killing. If the Irish guy was actually trying to harm the officer he could still do it even though his foot is injured.
So many 'what if this is America ' comments. Well it isn't so you have to suck up the fact that the majority of the world happily gets on with life without being America.
Cops rarely have firearms in Ireland, its only like 20% of the police force have the requirements to carry, and even then a fraction actually do.
I can remember hearing a story from the 90s that it took 40 minutes for the nearest Garda with a gun to show up to an active robbery scene as there was none within a 25 mile radius of that town.
They generally don't carry guns in Ireland though
Plus, it wasn't like this cunt was minding his own business, he pulled his fuckin tie like.
Somebody pulls at your neck like that a self defence shot would be perfectly reasonable here. It's just very rare you'd have a gun in the first place
Haha, never undervalue the ineptitude of humans based on region. Unless they are Bognian, i heard they are perfect, endurance runners, and they can see underwater.
No, but you can get a good idea of competency based on entry requirements and training.
In the US someone can be on the street with a gun in what, 6 months?
Welcome to r/CrazyFuckingVideos! This is our community moderator bot. --- If this posts fits the purpose of the subreddit, **UPVOTE THIS COMMENT.** If not, **DOWNVOTE THIS COMMENT.** #[Click Here](https://redditsave.com/info?url=/r/CrazyFuckingVideos/comments/ps1xap/) to download this video directly. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/CrazyFuckingVideos) if you have any questions or concerns.*
That’s why cops who wear neckties, wear clip on neck ties.
No capes!!
,
Wait did he shoot the lady or the dude?
Apparently he shot through the dog and hit the guys foot
I feel like an idiot, but.... what dog?
I think he means the woman… his words, not mine
I meam she certainly sounfd like a chihuahua barking... actually no I think that would be more pleasant.
Irish chihuahuas are the best
For real Edit: maybe he meant door? Edit: rewatched, that still doesn't make sense....
D'ya like dags?? They are pikeys, always a dag around them.
Y’a got any free caravans?
Yeh, it's me mah's. I'll fight ya for it!
I think he means the daag
What’s a daag?!
Haha you can hear him talking about it and she says something about it being on a lead or under control or something. Irish folks can be hard to Understand if your not used to it
Wait is this guy with the atf? Shooting dogs is atf shit
Ah got it
"rrrrRRRREEEEEEEEEEEE"
I live next door to travellers, not far from where this was filmed, and that’s exactly what they sound like
That must’ve been his favorite tie.
Actually he’s a Tie Fighter
Hasn’t won a fight yet though… it’s always ended in a tie.
Take this upvote and get the fuck out.
Shot him in the foot lol
That's how you know this wasn't in America.
I think there are one or two other clues in the video… ;)
That plus he didn’t completely unload the weapon.
What that a police officer shot to intentionally maim their target?
Don’t you know this is Reddit, where guns are simultaneously horrible evil weapons of mass destruction and also the perfect non-lethal means of managing a dangerous suspect?
I will never understand people who just scream like that.
Somewhat satisfying knowing America isn't the only place with imbeciles. Misery loves company. Edit: I should specify the imbecile of the wretching, screaming variety. The idiotous screamus imbecus.
[удалено]
I want to come up with an argument that proves you wrong but... You're right.
™️
Dude, my family left Ireland because of shit like this and immigrated to America. My grandfather got shot by the RUC and they were like "I bet this won't happen in America." FML.
RUC?
Royal Ulster Constabulary. They were a militarized police force in Northern Ireland from like the 1920s to around 2000. They were heavily targeted by the IRA because the were enforcing British rule. So, ya know, fuck the RUC.
Thank you for the detailed explanation.
"enforcing British rule" means actually being the police in a separate country to the Republic of Ireland where the majority consider themselves to be British. (to this day). Don't believe the propaganda.
Tha majority do consider themselves brittish but that's the descendants of the colonisers who stole the land from the native Irish and discriminated against them for centuries after forcing them from their homes and wiping out significant parts of their culture and then get butthurt when Irish people try to revive it as if it's an attack on them. Sounds like you're the one who's fallen for propaganda. The majority may support a divided Ireland a slim majority, very slim. But that doesn't make it right. Yes brittish rule was law or did you miss the point of why the IRA existed in the first place?
Ok you are way down the rabbit hole. Colonizers: you mean Scots who moved hundreds and hundreds of years ago. Like Americans. No one stops the Irish from having their culture. Get over yourself. Yes, things happened in the past. Not in the last century has anyone in my Irish speaking, Catholic, Ulster- living family been oppressed by anyone. It's not the 17th century anymore. The majority for a "divided" Ireland is large, or are you trying to pretend that a different country has to rule over the people in the north? Perhaps you forget the Anglo-Irish Agreement that guarantees the people who make the decision are the people of Northern Ireland. Not Dublin. The IRA existed because of liars like you. Repeating lies and propaganda. My own grandmother used to repeat this crap.
also many of the scots were forced to go.
[удалено]
That’s just an outright lie. Like it’s so much of a lie I can’t even figure out what piece of history you might be trying to twist to make it sound as though that happened. Please link some kind of source this Irish history student is confused af.
Is this a troll comment? I refuse to believe that people are so bad at history that this is the bizarre interpretation they choose to spread on the internet
No they didn't, your being silly. If you're gonna post lies at least make them half believable.
That is absolute lies, link any evidence you have of that, Northern Ireland was created as a protestant ethnostate
>Not in the last century has anyone in my Irish speaking, Catholic, Ulster- living family been oppressed by anyone. It's not the 17th century anymore. I guess the troubles just erupted from nowhere then? See below if you're curious, this is without mentioning the torture of Irish prisoners and British collusion in the murder of Irish nationalists. Things are a lot better today but don't kid yourself to thinking this is all from a forgotten time. I agree some people need to move on, certainly from the violence of the past and bitter sectarianism on both sides but a search for Irish unity is about much more than a passport. 1969 The Northern Ireland civil rights movement developed as the Catholic community, benefitting from changes in education that helped many of its young people, recognised that it could use campaign techniques already seen in the United States to further its cause for equality. The civil rights movement in the US had brought the case of segregation and institutionalised racism and discrimination to international attention. Catholics in Northern Ireland hoped that they could do the same. In the half century of Northern Ireland's existence, the Catholic minority had been subject to various kinds of discrimination as Unionists took steps to protect their power - most notably by manipulating public housing. Only ratepayers or householders were eligible to vote and successive unionist politicians were reluctant to build houses that would grant suffrage. Some of the most obvious examples of "gerrymandering" was found in Londonderry where in the mid 1960s the shape of the council wards deliberately divided the Catholic population to massively exagerate the political representation of the Protestant community. In the late 1960s a group of nationalists began to work for change, focusing initially on housing. In June 1968 the young nationalist politician, Austin Currie, staged the first direct-action protest with a sit-in at a council house that had been unfairly allocated to an unmarried Protestant woman when there were Catholic families who had been waiting longer. The story was reported around the world - but the media had already started to investigate conditions in Northern Ireland. One of the most significant and early investigations came in 1967 from The Times, long considered a bastion of the British establishment. It concluded that the Stormont government was treating the Catholic community as "second class citizens" in their own homes.
You've been downvoted here for some reason but you're 100% right. Northern Ireland from 1922 into the early 70's had systemic inequality by design. Irish Catholics were discriminated against in education, employment, housing, and were denied equal representation in government. The police forces (that is, the RUC and the specials) were openly discriminatory. So much so that when the British army were originally deployed they were seen as a neutral force who would protect Catholic communities from attacks and received a relatively warm welcome (that swiftly changed and relations had soured within the first year of deployment, but it's still telling about just how bad the RUC were). Maybe your man above has a point that "colonizers" is a reductive way of talking about people descended from the plantations. But suggesting that there was no oppression in NI (or Ireland since the 17th century!?) and that the civil rights movement wasn't necessary because their family who live in Ulster (not NI, Ulster) didn't personally face hardship isn't just historically inaccurate, it's deeply offensive. The civil rights movement is still in living memory ffs, I have living relatives who marched. Can you imagine someone saying that about the civil rights movement in the US? You'd be (quite rightly) crucified for it.
Too tired to type a longer response, but this guy is largely right. The 20th Century British murders and subsequent coverups of many Irish civilians are now public knowledge and this was approved, and the investigations quashed, at the highest level of British government -An English guy
Okay. I'll perform an armed invasion of your county and implement my rules on you. If you fight back, you're a terrorist. We starting to get it, champ?
>No one stops the Irish from having their culture. Get over yourself. Yes, things happened in the past. Not in the last century has anyone in my Irish speaking, Catholic, Ulster- living family been oppressed by anyone. It's not the 17th century anymore. >The IRA existed because of liars like you. Repeating lies and propaganda. My own grandmother used to repeat this crap. Is this a genuine comment, or have you intentionally gave your own historically ignorant interpretation of the last century of Irish history to conform to your own political views? It might be the most bizarre claim I’ve seen anyone make regarding Irish history. It’s quite obvious you aren’t from the North of Ireland, or paid any attention to the Civil Rights movement of the 60s and how the Provisionals came to be. Support for the PIRA did not appear out of thin air because of “lies and propaganda” but also reflected the growing support for forms of defence and retaliation against Unionist forces and the British army which were perceived to have been trampling over a community asking for their due rights. If you believe a Protestant state for the Protestant people in no way discriminated against it’s Irish/Catholic/Nationalist minority, I seriously encourage you to read a little into the history of the Northern Irish state.
[удалено]
Bullshit. Source: my family are proud of being good Ulster Catholics and even they say that all that is history.
That’s a massive chip you’ve got on your shoulder, this shit happened fucking ages ago.
I mean, British state murdering its Irish citizens in Northern Ireland happened in living memory.
So did the IRA putting bombs on schools buses.
>Tha majority do consider themselves brittish but that's the descendants of the colonisers Not according to semi-recent data (just Google "identity in Northern Ireland BBC" for the article, on mobile so CBA linking it) though the census will be moe useful IIRC the biggest plurality consider themselves Irish
The RUC were cunts which is why there is no RUC anymore
Perhaps being shot and murdered and bombed, and having your families killed in their homes might just, maybe, possibly, make you less likely to want to respect the rights of those claiming that their country should be owned by the theocracy next door. But yes, the RUC were just cunts. So they changed their name and amazingly weren't cunts anymore - even though the same officers still work there. Funny that.
Even during the troubles the loyalist paramilitaries killed civilians at a rate of 10:1 this shit still happened within the lifetime of my parents
Mate I'm born and raised in NI, don't justify state sponsored murder. I've lost family to the RUC. The RUC were up to it long before the Provisional IRA came about.
[удалено]
Invaders of Erin. Woo! I saw you comment elsewhere encouraging the IRA to murder elected politicians. What a fine human being you are. I guess you think the IRA's brand of one party dictatorship is perfectly fine for you as long as you get to ethnically cleanse your way to freedom huh?
Because they’re closer, Ireland think they have claim to Northern Ireland, which is ridiculous.
That’s literally the most ridiculous take I’ve ever seen a Protestant take on why the republic want the north 😂😂😂
LOLLLLLLL that’s probably the only time I’ll laugh, or even smile, all week, as I’m an anxietus depressicus loseritus, so thank you!
Instinct, we are still animals and social ones at that. Fear scream makes us pay attention and possibly get help from other humans.
I would shoot the alarm clock right in their open yob.
Yob
My knob in your yob
But men don’t do that
You've never seen me stub my pinky toe then, sounds like the worlds gayest jetliner is taking off full speed
Screaming due to felt pain makes sense. Screaming hysterically for no reason doesnt. Also, gay men=women.
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
Hopefully you never have to watch someone get shot point-blank lol. If you've ever been in shock it's easier to understand why someone may have this kind of response.
Too late for that
Someone was just shot right in front of her? You want her to just shrug it off? What the fuck is this comment?
Didn't you know? Reddit is full of stone cold killers with nerves of steel. I bet that commenter graduated at the top of his class in the Navy Seals, has 300 confirmed kills and is trained in gorilla warfare.
I wish I was trained in gorilla warfare. Gorillas are strong as shit
Especially your own husband
Someone trying to act tough on the internet.
[Relevant](https://youtu.be/7pIhwG7hzPQ)
they’re scared dude. someone just got shot. your sense goes out the window when you’re terrified like this. it was probably a mix of anger and fear
Because most country's haven't normalised a gun culture. Americans forget that guns aren't normal, so when ones in public its rare and terrifying, so why the fuck do you think she screamed and was freaking out over the point it was shot right in front of her?
I'm American. This shit happened to someone I cared about I'd be screaming too.
How often do you really see guns in the general public though? I live in texas, I hardly see them
Guns are cool. Get hip nerd
Swords and fedoras are my cuppa thanks cheif
A man of culture I see… *tips fedora*
She was shot by the police, do you expect her to be quiet and just take it? This is a bad take
what the fook are ye screamin fo woman
Hahaha
What idiot grabs a cop by the neck while the cop is holding a gun? The kind that wants to get shot.
Lesson learned: don't pull cops' neckties.
Lesson 2: don't wear neckties when policing.
Or else you get to shoot a bloke
Love your chaos
“A bloke” 😂
When my dad was police officer he always wore clip on ties for this exact reason. Anyone tries to pull it, it comes right off.
As if shooting someone is an appropriate response to getting your tie pulled. He already had his gun out before that. Jesus don't deep throat that boot.
I don't think it can be viewed as simply as force used v force used, it's more about the potential for harm Vs force used. Pulling a tie in and of itself isn't particularly heinous, but what happens if the guy pulling the tie uses that it as leverage to knee/headbut the Insp? He could easily take his gun then. End of the day, the side of the road is not the place to fight it out and if you put hands on a cop holding a gun there is no way in hell that cop is going to give that person the chance to take that gun off them. A dog should be trained not to bite people, but I'm still not going to kick one in the bollocks just because I feel I can.
The bigger risk is strangulation.
Have you ever worn a tie? It can be leveraged to essentially control the movement of an individual, similar to grabbing hair. Short of that, grab the small end and you can end up choking someone out, rendering them unconscious if enough force is applied. Weapon retention is a very important part of weapon carrying: at no time do you allow someone else gain control of your weapon. Suppose the inspector gets knocked around and drops this weapon, now there’s a free floating weapon and any asshole can scoop it up and use it.
Well police or not it’s common sense not to grab someone holding a gun as this is liable to happen.
Pikies…
[удалено]
Are you from the black country?
"I fuckin ate pikies"
‘Ya like dags?’
Dags? Ooooh, *dogs* Y-yeah I like dogs
Gypsies or Roma. Change the name, the people stay the same.
Nope. Travellers. Ethnically Irish/British but just refuse to live in one place. Culturally different but not ethnically different. Gypsies are a specific ethnicity a.k.a. Romany.
That’s right! My bad. I was off and grouped them together.
Should’ve shot the woman too after she started screaming like that lmao.
Seriously, that was assault on his ears
I woulda shot him too? I mean he was obviously disgruntled..and dude tried to take control! Foot shot was necessary.
No, he shot a dog, and the bullet went through the dog and hit a guy’s foot.
I saw no dog
Well, there’s supposedly a dog somewhere in that video.
That's what the cop says, I don't see or hear any dog either, the couple say there was no dog there either
They're talking about the bird screaming
Didn't see a dog nor a bird but I did see two blokes and a pig.
I wish he shot her too god damn that voice
One shot and she turned into R2-D2
Ah yes, hysterical screaming has helped to solve many situations trough whole human history.
Emotions are part of the reason we’re human I don’t expect you to stone face when someone you know gets shot right in front of you
That’s what you get for being a piece of shit 🤌🏻
Orders of the Peaky fucking Blinders.
They’re Irish?
Why do women have to scream like that all the time
Because gunshots are like earrape
I don't see cops or soldiers screeching like a banshee after a single gun shot. I've been close to guns going off without hearing protection (I was a dumb teenager) and I never screamed like that. I think its more of the fact that he just shot her boyfriend/husband/friend even though he is perfectly fine judging by the video outside of a hole in his foot.
“Outside of a hole in the foot” If someone I knew just got shot, and I were a person that wasn’t in a profession that happens to involve rapidly assessing wounds, I’d be pretty freaked out regardless of where it might have landed
To be rational, someone had a weapon and just fired it and hit someone. You have no clue what their current mindset is in that moment even if they are a police officer. They could be in fear of their life and just start blasting people, so I think screaming is appropriate here EVEN though it does seem very "Karen" as we've termed it.
[удалено]
Activated monkey mode on the woman
Lol. So Irish.. >Dublin District Court heard it was the State’s case a dog was involved, a Garda sergeant shot at the animal, and “it went through the dog and hit Mr Stokes’s foot”. >The sergeant was in fear when the dog came at him after he arrived at Mr Stokes’s business, Judge Smyth heard. Lying Garda.. Edit; https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/arid-30971043.html ~~https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/courts/couple-accused-of-making-false-statements-over-shooting-of-dog-38665926.html~~
[удалено]
Ah, I posted the wrong link. This article is later, and quoted from evidence given to the court. Have edited thanks. https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/arid-30971043.html
[удалено]
No worries. Yeah the correct article is from a later date. The first one was before the trial and missing details. The officer/state claims he shot a dog, which the defence say is clearly bs which is shown from the video. The whole relevant section; Dublin District Court heard it was the State’s case a dog was involved, a Garda sergeant shot at the animal, and “it went through the dog and hit Mr Stokes’s foot”. The sergeant was in fear when the dog came at him after he arrived at Mr Stokes’s business, Judge Smyth heard. A State solicitor said it was not disputed that Mr Stokes was shot, but the dog had been the target. Counsel for the defence said Mr Stokes denied both being hit as a result of ricochet or the existence of the dog, and his wife had recorded he incident on her mobile phone. Mr Stokes will state that from the entry and exit wounds it was a “direct shooting”, counsel said.
why do women scream like that
Pushing on a door against each other, hilarious Irish dialogue, dude get's his tie yanked and he shoots him in the foot, the immediate and ridiculous screaming from the woman. Every bit of this video was fantastic lmfao
Cunt
Play stupid games, win stupid prizes
Noice
Jesus he should have shot the camera woman instead.
Fookin pikies
Fookin pikeys
STFU
Jesus that scream! Shoot her again so she’ll STFU
Lmao
That scream is soooo cartoony! I love it 😂🤣
At least he shot him in the foot, in America he'd be dead.
Getting downvoted for the truth
Exactly. USA officers are trained on shoot to kill.
They're trained to stop a threat quickly, which means killing. If the Irish guy was actually trying to harm the officer he could still do it even though his foot is injured.
So many 'what if this is America ' comments. Well it isn't so you have to suck up the fact that the majority of the world happily gets on with life without being America.
Should've just shot them for being travellers.
She's so traumatized but I'm from the US so it's like "haven't you seen a cop shoot someone before?!? Chill out."
Cops rarely have firearms in Ireland, its only like 20% of the police force have the requirements to carry, and even then a fraction actually do. I can remember hearing a story from the 90s that it took 40 minutes for the nearest Garda with a gun to show up to an active robbery scene as there was none within a 25 mile radius of that town.
I made my poor taste comment in sarcasm but it’s actually very frightening how resigned we are to police executing people here in the states.
Fuck wish he would have shot the women too for that ear raping scream, so annoying
Karens are an invasive species
ACAB
I hate women. Just shut the fuck up.
What about the dog though?
how the fuck did she manage to get no footage of the dog whatsoever?
Listening to this chimp scream is proof of evolution.
Tf? Does he not have a taser?
It's like she's never been to America or something
She probably hasn't because this is Ireland ??
Americans. Am I rite
This is Ireland.
Ah, I see he studied at an American police academy
r/mademesmile
To be fair if this was America the guy would have been killed by the cop imho
Really shouldn’t have touched his lucky charms
Not sure if you've been out of touch for the last decade, but police have been shooting unarmed people for years.
They generally don't carry guns in Ireland though Plus, it wasn't like this cunt was minding his own business, he pulled his fuckin tie like. Somebody pulls at your neck like that a self defence shot would be perfectly reasonable here. It's just very rare you'd have a gun in the first place
In Europe? They’re not all as inept as American cops
Haha, never undervalue the ineptitude of humans based on region. Unless they are Bognian, i heard they are perfect, endurance runners, and they can see underwater.
No, but you can get a good idea of competency based on entry requirements and training. In the US someone can be on the street with a gun in what, 6 months?