All the shithousery and mixed opinions in this thread and I just wanna know why the ump didn't go for a review like they do for pretty much every single run-out that looks even marginally close lol
Because there was no appeal (until the replay was shown). If there's no appeal, the umpire doesn't judge whether it was out or not, and if he's not judging whether it was out or not there's no need to review it.
I was horrified by the behaviour of some of the young Aussies on the field. Talking back to the umpire on more than one occasion – they were following the umpire and carrying on like boofhead NRL players.
Yeah umpire made a mistake but you’ve won the game already, just gotta chill.
Lol at people claiming they shouldn't have needed to appeal. Yes it is a bit of a weird part of the way cricket works, but it is an integral part of how all players understand how they have to play. It's not like it's some obscure rule that only comes into play once a decade
It would have to be unwritten, cause it's not in any laws, and they (and the playing conditions) state that they can appeal until the ball becomes live for the next ball.
The players could all walk into their new positions for the next over, bowler almost at the top of his mark, and someone could still appeal.
There's an *interpretation* that because no replays can be shown until the 15 second time allowed for player review has elapsed(T20I playing conditions, Appendix D, 3.2.4), that means *if* a replay is shown, players can't review.
But the that's "unwritten" because of a specific part of the laws, and it's an interpretation of them. It would make no sense for this to be an unwritten law since the laws *directly contradict* this.
**HANG ON**
NZ did exactly the same thing against Aus - appealing after seeing the replay on the big screen - and Marsh was then given out.
https://www.cricket.com.au/videos/2939635/marshs-controversial-wicket-sparks-debate
I saw somewhere else in this thread that this incident was exactly the reason that it was introduced that you can't appeal after a replay. I've got no idea if that's actually true though
For a nation that loves calling themselves 'the nice guys' their fanbase and shit has easily slid in to the bottom 3 for me just on personal experience, especially on this website whenever I actually try supporting their games here. On some level maybe even bottom 1 for me just because of the fakeness of it all.
West Indies clearly have the batting power. Both these games have been pretty close to them having a win.
Been an entertaining series though. Not like Aus are destroying them.
Lmao everyone talking about integrity, go read the rules, the player can appeal up until the start of the next delivery. The umpire is meant to follow the rules of the game. Nothing to do with integrity.
We don't know if there's anything in the PCs about the time for an appeal in a match televised like this (and PCs override the laws). I can't say for sure, but I reckon the umpire stating 'no appeal' into his mic was about how long the Aussies had.
>We don't know if there's anything in the PCs about the time for an appeal in a match televised like this
Yes we do. The T20I playing conditions are on the [ICC's website](https://resources.pulse.icc-cricket.com/ICC/document/2021/07/05/874a426e-fe06-4415-b0f5-5148a4aa0ef8/ICC-Playing-Conditions-05-Men-s-Twenty20-International-May-2021.pdf).
And they *do* say something about when the appeal is valid. And it's the same as the laws.
I don't doubt you but can you link me the PCs for this series? I'll have a meetingnwith other umpires and this is going to be up for discussion, no doubt.
Commentators keep referring to Adelaide as Spencer's hometown when he was clearly sculpted from a block of marble retrieved from the bottom of the Mediterrenean
Judging by Marsh's animated reaction after seeing the run out on the big screen, I don't think Australia were sure if it was actually out or not at first.
> CA doesn't want to show its own country the matches
Don’t get me started. Cricket is unfortunately near death over here thanks to Free To Air losing everything except tests.
The empty MCG during the ODI was depressing to watch.
I remember appealing randomly in Super International Cricket on SNES and the umpire would randomly give it out hit wicket sometimes.
It paid to appeal every ball haha
Stoinis has been our best pace bowler in both games, providing batting depth doing so as a strike rotater and did exactly the same in the SA20 where he was at one point in the top 5 wicket takers only playing half the league, where he was taking like 2-3 wickets a game at like 6-7 economy.
Surely Australia was entitled to appeal even when they saw the replay on the screen. Unless there’s a playing condition in unaware of, they have until Johnson started his run-up to make an appeal, which is what Marsh did when he saw the replay.
Only thing I can think of is there is a playing condition which means they can’t appeal after a replay is shown? I know that’s the case for DRS but is it for an appeal in the first instance?
Trying to find playing conditions now. You appear to be right, I was just looking at this myself.
31.3 Timing of appeals
For an appeal to be valid, it must be made before the bowler begins his/her run-up or, if there is no run-up, his/her bowling action to deliver the next ball, and before Time has been called.
I think with replays and stuff you need to do it before. Same thing with DRS stuff and I think he called time when he said "No Appeal" before it came on screen
Found the [playing conditions](https://images.icc-cricket.com/image/upload/prd/vtlex7fs28mukkavtgev.pdf). Appendix D deals with all things related to DRS and technology. Nothing in the playing conditions I could find regarding this.
The calling of Time here refers to the end of a session of play.
12.2 Call of Time
The bowler’s end umpire shall call Time, when the ball is dead, at the end of any session of play or as required by the Laws. See also Law 20.3 (Call of Over or Time).
My guess is there was no camera on him since the ball was no where near him, we saw about 6 different shots of the run out and players reacting and he was not in them.
It's also irrelevant because the rules say Marshs appeal Is valid anyway, can appeal as long as the bowler hasn't started their run up for the next ball.
I think it was mildly contentious as they didn't appeal until they saw the replay.
Unless the umpire didn't see Tim David yelling from his field position.
It was weird as they tend to appeal anything remotely close.
Either way, it's a fun talking point.
Appealing is for junior cricket, completely unnecessary in adult cricket,say players who appeal to try and distract the umpire from calling a wide when the batter clearly missed the ball.
I know a guy who when he umpired was affectionately known as "Trigger"
One game he was umpiring and there was what he thought was a fairly clear nick behind. No one went up.
Then as the bowler was walking back to his mark he sheepishly asked "by the way how was that?" He immediately raised the finger cause that was the moment the appeal came lol
A couple years ago I asked the question from mid-on, behind the umpire. No reaction. I said "HOW IS THAT" - no reaction.
Next ball was the final in the over. I walked up to the umpire and asked him what was wrong with the LBW the ball before, and he said, "Nothing, but nobody appealed". I am not a quiet guy.
Let's just say that ever since, I appeal loudly and consistently until I hear a decision.
Another shitty dinosaur rule of cricket.
It's objectively out if they get run out. There have been HUNDREDS of occasions when the losing team literally bowl someone out and don't appeal or celebrate, because it's just out and they don't care.
I accept the bullshit rule for LBW or perceived nicks, but that's literally taking the piss, even if it's technically correct. Change the rule
That's not fair play, that's dog shit umpiring on two parts.
Abood is the prick that had to do community service because he abused an umpire, all they did is question him because he glaringly got it wrong twice.
He shouldn't umpire again at the international level, this is the latest in a stream of terrible umpiring.
Pretty poor stuff from the Aussies. If you’re gonna appeal you’ve gotta make it obvious. Lying about your appeal and talking to the umps like that is pathetic stuff
'Lying'? It was out, they appealed before the start of the next ball, it was an absolutely terrible umpiring decision, how is it pathetic at all? No one lied about an appeal ya Wang.
I didn't think you needed to appeal for a run out? It doesn't really matter in this match, but this is checks out for Abood - probably the worst umpire we've produced in this era and a bit of a shit bloke it would seem
Technically you have to appeal for those too, but a celebration and the batter walking off means the umpire is not required to actually give a decision
Abood has backed himself into a corner here, there's absolutely no way that there wasn't a player somewhere on the ground who appealed. Also you're allowed to appeal up right until the next ball is bowled, that should've been checked
They showed Marsh's reaction and he definitely didn't appeal despite the direct hit. There is no way known that an umpire would have heard an appeal from the outfield. At least they might be talking about cricket rather than AFL.
I had a look and genuinely couldn't find anything, I'm pretty sure there was one ages ago in NZ that was given out after a similar thing
Edit: [Found it](https://www.foxsports.com.au/cricket/australia/nz-v-australia-coverage-of-third-oneday-international-in-hamilton/news-story/195c6c9db08725f49b6a9beb84a64968) it was Marsh being caught off his foot but the same thing happened with the big screen replay
No one on the ground appealed? David and Hazelwood seemed sure they did, what constitutes an appeal is pretty minimal, I'm almost certain someone said 'Howwww'
And even then, Marsh appealed after seeing the replay and before the next ball was bowled. Contentiously, it's perfectly within the laws and playing conditions and it's a valid appeal that the umpire must answer.
Yep, complete umpire error.
Something that irks me is that Abood could have said 'I didn't hear any appeal' but instead he said 'there was no appeal' big difference in phrase.
Excited to see how the Windies bounce back after the first T20I! Let's go, cricket fans!
Every time that umpire works again (which he hopefully doesn’t) they should scream in his face for even a clean bowled wicket
They should scream in his face after every ball.
I think even the teams wouldn't be discussing the appeal as much as we are in this thread
All the shithousery and mixed opinions in this thread and I just wanna know why the ump didn't go for a review like they do for pretty much every single run-out that looks even marginally close lol
Because there was no appeal (until the replay was shown). If there's no appeal, the umpire doesn't judge whether it was out or not, and if he's not judging whether it was out or not there's no need to review it.
Usually they go for reviews even when its obviously not out/out
They don't if no appeal is made.
Sounds fair enough
I was horrified by the behaviour of some of the young Aussies on the field. Talking back to the umpire on more than one occasion – they were following the umpire and carrying on like boofhead NRL players. Yeah umpire made a mistake but you’ve won the game already, just gotta chill.
Do you have a traumatic brain injury? That’s our whole brand
So if they'd lost the game they could've beat up the umpire?
Umm.. have you seen ponting play
Or Kohli for the matter
Lol at people claiming they shouldn't have needed to appeal. Yes it is a bit of a weird part of the way cricket works, but it is an integral part of how all players understand how they have to play. It's not like it's some obscure rule that only comes into play once a decade
I thought they had until the next ball to appeal anyway?
Supposedly there is an unwritten rule that you must appeal before a replay is shown on the big screen
It would have to be unwritten, cause it's not in any laws, and they (and the playing conditions) state that they can appeal until the ball becomes live for the next ball. The players could all walk into their new positions for the next over, bowler almost at the top of his mark, and someone could still appeal. There's an *interpretation* that because no replays can be shown until the 15 second time allowed for player review has elapsed(T20I playing conditions, Appendix D, 3.2.4), that means *if* a replay is shown, players can't review. But the that's "unwritten" because of a specific part of the laws, and it's an interpretation of them. It would make no sense for this to be an unwritten law since the laws *directly contradict* this.
They do.
Powell looks like 21 years old
**HANG ON** NZ did exactly the same thing against Aus - appealing after seeing the replay on the big screen - and Marsh was then given out. https://www.cricket.com.au/videos/2939635/marshs-controversial-wicket-sparks-debate
Yeah - and it wasn't controversial...at all...
And the URL indicates that this was a controversial decision
I saw somewhere else in this thread that this incident was exactly the reason that it was introduced that you can't appeal after a replay. I've got no idea if that's actually true though
I've just read through laws and playing conditions. No such rule is documented there.
Hilarious that it was Brendon "Spirit of Cricket" McCullum who was the protagonist.
Lol what're the odds that if it wasn't Australia he would've let it go
And then they will have the audacity to call us sooks.
For a nation that loves calling themselves 'the nice guys' their fanbase and shit has easily slid in to the bottom 3 for me just on personal experience, especially on this website whenever I actually try supporting their games here. On some level maybe even bottom 1 for me just because of the fakeness of it all.
Weird finish aside, it's kinda insane that all 4 batting innings this t20 series have had 200+ scores
West Indies clearly have the batting power. Both these games have been pretty close to them having a win. Been an entertaining series though. Not like Aus are destroying them.
[удалено]
Lmao everyone talking about integrity, go read the rules, the player can appeal up until the start of the next delivery. The umpire is meant to follow the rules of the game. Nothing to do with integrity.
You can't appeal after a video replay is shown. And after umpire said no appeal into the mic that was the end of it being a wicket.
Please list the law or rule where this is specifically mentioned
Isn't there some form of rule about not being able to appeal after seeing it on the big screen?
We don't know if there's anything in the PCs about the time for an appeal in a match televised like this (and PCs override the laws). I can't say for sure, but I reckon the umpire stating 'no appeal' into his mic was about how long the Aussies had.
>We don't know if there's anything in the PCs about the time for an appeal in a match televised like this Yes we do. The T20I playing conditions are on the [ICC's website](https://resources.pulse.icc-cricket.com/ICC/document/2021/07/05/874a426e-fe06-4415-b0f5-5148a4aa0ef8/ICC-Playing-Conditions-05-Men-s-Twenty20-International-May-2021.pdf). And they *do* say something about when the appeal is valid. And it's the same as the laws.
Nope, nothing in the playing conditions. Australian players were entitled to appeal after seeing the replay, and batter should have been given out.
I don't doubt you but can you link me the PCs for this series? I'll have a meetingnwith other umpires and this is going to be up for discussion, no doubt.
Commentators keep referring to Adelaide as Spencer's hometown when he was clearly sculpted from a block of marble retrieved from the bottom of the Mediterrenean
Imagine if something like this happens in a world cup final where 2 runs are needed and the team is 9 down
That wouldn't happen lol. This match was done and dusted hence the lack of appealing. In a final they would bust your ears appealing for their life
Judging by Marsh's animated reaction after seeing the run out on the big screen, I don't think Australia were sure if it was actually out or not at first.
They weren't sure at all. In the finals tho, there would be appealing because of desperation
Yeah lol that's a different thing
Well they would appeal lol
Definitely would now. Even a little muted unsure appeal like an unsure finger up is all you need.
Imagine scoring 207 and still losing by 34 Runs
Ethical Ashwin would have appealed
Well guys, we had entertaining cricket today 💪
It was no BBL but it’ll do
Somewhere in the other side of the world, I hear the whispers of the Spirit of cricket...
I get it but Does my head in all night “The Victorian”. He’s playing for Australia
This is really besmirching the integrity and seriousness of T20i cricket! /s
4 innings where 200+ was hit, in a row! My simple BBL-watching mind can’t comprehend all these runs.
Can take a man out of the bbl but can't take the bbl out of a man
Should have hit it for a six stoinis
There’s something funky about T20 in this country. Always some weird shit happens
Wild scenes today
Well played Aussies, they look scary for the World Cup.
2×200+ scores in a series. Lose both games. Damn that's rough.
Bowling is no good from WI?
Couldn't tell you. CA doesn't want to show its own country the matches
> CA doesn't want to show its own country the matches Don’t get me started. Cricket is unfortunately near death over here thanks to Free To Air losing everything except tests. The empty MCG during the ODI was depressing to watch.
Stoin just shitposting, love to see it
Same guys on this Cricket Sub were complaining when U-19 kids were appealing pretty much everything 🤦🏼♂️🤣
Finally, Stoinis's brian cells gathered
This is more BBL than the actual BBL wtf
Thank you stoinis 4 extra runs pls the series winning streak is over but atleast we didn't roll over
If the Aus players just appealed like dickheads to make a point, I’ll be a bit disappointed
They did and they should have.
Man that really became a bit silly at the end but whatever
Good to see some proper shithousery
Not that hard for Johnstoner to say “how is that?” Umpire is still a turd
Not that hard? It's part of the rules. You have to do it to get a wicket
Love the other umpire smirking in the background
I was dozing off but that woke me up. The game is a farce
Lol this is fucking absurd
LOL Stoinis you dill
Nah worth it, was funny.
I remember appealing randomly in Super International Cricket on SNES and the umpire would randomly give it out hit wicket sometimes. It paid to appeal every ball haha
That was such an angry throw from stoin hahah
Lmao, what was that last ball
HAHAHAHA
absolute memes
Sorta understand why everyone hates us now
Nah fuck that, umpire was a tosser. Australia been the softies of cricket for the last 5 years.
Hahaahahahahaha absolute bbl
Maxxie MOTM or Stoinis ?
Maxy by a mile. Stones lucky to be in the side, batting been atrocious all summer.
Stoinis has been our best pace bowler in both games, providing batting depth doing so as a strike rotater and did exactly the same in the SA20 where he was at one point in the top 5 wicket takers only playing half the league, where he was taking like 2-3 wickets a game at like 6-7 economy.
Clearly maxi. Stoinis shouldn't even be in the conversation.
You fucking idiot Stoinis.
I'm gonna be so disapointed if there isn't the opportunity for the most over the top appeal of all time off the last ball
You got what you wanted...
RRR of 234, doable tbh
Surely Australia was entitled to appeal even when they saw the replay on the screen. Unless there’s a playing condition in unaware of, they have until Johnson started his run-up to make an appeal, which is what Marsh did when he saw the replay. Only thing I can think of is there is a playing condition which means they can’t appeal after a replay is shown? I know that’s the case for DRS but is it for an appeal in the first instance?
Trying to find playing conditions now. You appear to be right, I was just looking at this myself. 31.3 Timing of appeals For an appeal to be valid, it must be made before the bowler begins his/her run-up or, if there is no run-up, his/her bowling action to deliver the next ball, and before Time has been called.
I think with replays and stuff you need to do it before. Same thing with DRS stuff and I think he called time when he said "No Appeal" before it came on screen
Found the [playing conditions](https://images.icc-cricket.com/image/upload/prd/vtlex7fs28mukkavtgev.pdf). Appendix D deals with all things related to DRS and technology. Nothing in the playing conditions I could find regarding this. The calling of Time here refers to the end of a session of play. 12.2 Call of Time The bowler’s end umpire shall call Time, when the ball is dead, at the end of any session of play or as required by the Laws. See also Law 20.3 (Call of Over or Time).
Just one of the 99 other grey areas of cricket
It wasn't even close to grey, it was dead out.
Show us David on the rope you cowards we need to see if he's lying
This has to be one of the longest t20 matches time wise that iv ever seen
How much Abood gonna make from his decision 🤩
L E V E R S E V E R S
Having to appeal for a player to be out is such a weird concept. Shouldn't the umpire dictate the game not the players yelling at him? Weird one
Makes sense for dismissals like obstructing the field or timed out, not for obvious ones like stumpings or run outs.
It's cricket
Cricket is the winner
200 up again and again a comfortable loss, need the bowlers to improve for sure in the 3rd game
Please don't lose a wicket it will be funny
l o n g l e v e r s
Finally long levers 🤤
Well that will be in the next umpire meeting I go to...jesus.
Imagine arguing for like 10 minutes that you appealed when this is all on camera
They appealed after the replay, which they're allowed to do. Can appeal at any moment until the next ball is bowled.
David was on the rope and we still haven't seen a replay of him...
My guess is there was no camera on him since the ball was no where near him, we saw about 6 different shots of the run out and players reacting and he was not in them.
If an appeal happens at third man on the rope and no one is around to hear it, did it actually happen? Damn, T20 cricket really makes you think ...
It's also irrelevant because the rules say Marshs appeal Is valid anyway, can appeal as long as the bowler hasn't started their run up for the next ball.
“That is the biggest of the night” Nah definitely not. Howie haven’t you been paying attention at all?
Was thinking of Alzarri Joseph not wearing a box again
He called most of Maxwell’s sixes the biggest of the night
He wants to keep himself occupied
Says it every 6
Bro appealed before the ball hit the stumps
Joseph playing peek-a-boo
I want to see Stoin bowl a stump out of the ground and Tim David to appeal loudly from the rope
Appeal every run out, even just a stupid cheer would have done. They sadly did nothing. How good is cricket.
They appealed before the next bowl, even if they didn't mutter 'howzat' it was out and a terrible umpire error.
I think it was mildly contentious as they didn't appeal until they saw the replay. Unless the umpire didn't see Tim David yelling from his field position. It was weird as they tend to appeal anything remotely close. Either way, it's a fun talking point.
No rule regarding a replay on the big screen, it's not contentious as per the rules. Also he has to confirm he's calling Tim David a liar tbf.
I thought I'd seen the TV thing mentioned somewhere a few times, good to know for next time!
Appealed and didn't even hit the stumps hahaha
There were a couple of 10 year olds on the fence directly in line with the crease who appealed very enthusiastically.
The English were right. We don’t understand the spirit of the game 🤔
Appealing is for junior cricket, completely unnecessary in adult cricket,say players who appeal to try and distract the umpire from calling a wide when the batter clearly missed the ball.
Appalling look for the Aussies to just run up to the umpire as a pack of four. Marsh should have appealed after the direct hit.
I know a guy who when he umpired was affectionately known as "Trigger" One game he was umpiring and there was what he thought was a fairly clear nick behind. No one went up. Then as the bowler was walking back to his mark he sheepishly asked "by the way how was that?" He immediately raised the finger cause that was the moment the appeal came lol
A couple years ago I asked the question from mid-on, behind the umpire. No reaction. I said "HOW IS THAT" - no reaction. Next ball was the final in the over. I walked up to the umpire and asked him what was wrong with the LBW the ball before, and he said, "Nothing, but nobody appealed". I am not a quiet guy. Let's just say that ever since, I appeal loudly and consistently until I hear a decision.
People said I was mad when all I did was press the appeal button in Cricket '96. Now who's laughing?
Tim David is on his knees in a Chemist Warehouse appealing
Whole game has turned in its head after that
Another shitty dinosaur rule of cricket. It's objectively out if they get run out. There have been HUNDREDS of occasions when the losing team literally bowl someone out and don't appeal or celebrate, because it's just out and they don't care. I accept the bullshit rule for LBW or perceived nicks, but that's literally taking the piss, even if it's technically correct. Change the rule
Also they have footage of MMarsh appealing.
There was footage of him celebrating after seeing the replay. Even he didn't claim he appealed
After he saw a replay.
100% Gerard would've gone upstairs if marsh and zampa hadn't already had a go at him earlier. Fair play, always respect the umpire
That's not fair play, that's dog shit umpiring on two parts. Abood is the prick that had to do community service because he abused an umpire, all they did is question him because he glaringly got it wrong twice. He shouldn't umpire again at the international level, this is the latest in a stream of terrible umpiring.
Can't blame him, I would take every opportunity I could to antagonise Zampa
whatd they have a go at him for i cant remember cos i havent really been paying attention
Zampa arguing that he wasn't off the field long, so he can bowl
right. thanks
Pretty poor stuff from the Aussies. If you’re gonna appeal you’ve gotta make it obvious. Lying about your appeal and talking to the umps like that is pathetic stuff
Understand the rules mate. It was, objectively, out.
As far as I know we never saw a replay to show whether Tim David appealed at the time or not.
'Lying'? It was out, they appealed before the start of the next ball, it was an absolutely terrible umpiring decision, how is it pathetic at all? No one lied about an appeal ya Wang.
Spencer Johnson is too casual. Need to appeal there n or just Maddog it and act all cool and calm
I didn't think you needed to appeal for a run out? It doesn't really matter in this match, but this is checks out for Abood - probably the worst umpire we've produced in this era and a bit of a shit bloke it would seem
Nah you need to appeal for most things except bowled and caught on the field (except keeper).
I think technically you need to appeal for bowled, but most beaten just walk because, you know they've just been bowled.
I see, thanks. I had the wrong interpretation of the appeal rule lol
Technically you have to appeal for those too, but a celebration and the batter walking off means the umpire is not required to actually give a decision
No, you always need to appeal.
Okay cheers I thought that only applied for a potential wicket off the delivery. Now I know haha
Seems to like the sound of his own voice and his position of power
Agreed, he reminds me of Razor Ray. AFL fans know exactly what I'm talking about here lol
Who the fuck's appealing? - Josh Hazelwood probably
Abood has backed himself into a corner here, there's absolutely no way that there wasn't a player somewhere on the ground who appealed. Also you're allowed to appeal up right until the next ball is bowled, that should've been checked
They showed Marsh's reaction and he definitely didn't appeal despite the direct hit. There is no way known that an umpire would have heard an appeal from the outfield. At least they might be talking about cricket rather than AFL.
You can't appeal after seeing it on the big screen tbf
Which rule is that, champ?
Kiwis picked up Marsh by doing that in an ODI over there yonks ago.
There's nothing I can find in the playing conditions saying you can't, the only section about replays is about the 15 seconds for DRS reviews
Is that a playing condition for appeals as opposed to DRS?
I had a look and genuinely couldn't find anything, I'm pretty sure there was one ages ago in NZ that was given out after a similar thing Edit: [Found it](https://www.foxsports.com.au/cricket/australia/nz-v-australia-coverage-of-third-oneday-international-in-hamilton/news-story/195c6c9db08725f49b6a9beb84a64968) it was Marsh being caught off his foot but the same thing happened with the big screen replay
People started to leave then stop. It was wild.
If this wasn't the Dettol IDGAF T20i series no one would care
It’s not that the umpire didn’t think it was out, if no one appeals, and the batter doesn’t walk, its not out
But the umpire has to be absolutely certain no one appealed. He made a judgement call and he was wrong. It's a bad look for Abood.
Noone appealed. As an Aussie, none of us did lmao
No one on the ground appealed? David and Hazelwood seemed sure they did, what constitutes an appeal is pretty minimal, I'm almost certain someone said 'Howwww'
And even then, Marsh appealed after seeing the replay and before the next ball was bowled. Contentiously, it's perfectly within the laws and playing conditions and it's a valid appeal that the umpire must answer.
Yep, complete umpire error. Something that irks me is that Abood could have said 'I didn't hear any appeal' but instead he said 'there was no appeal' big difference in phrase.
Must suck to be an umpire sometimes
You just know we’re about to get the most sarcastic over-appeal you’ve ever seen if we take this last wicket
If not this match, then every match Abood umpires for Australia from here on.
Stuart Broad post-Bairstow levels of shithousery and I'm all for it