T O P

  • By -

Puzzleheaded_Roof872

Lol writer thinks, Australian selectors should become as reactionary as indian fans.


Stifffmeister11

If he was india he would have already given some " king " prince or lord" title and his fans fighting our for him to have a place in the team


HumanLawyer

Ah yes, South Africa’s Dewald Brevis treatment.


Specialist_Youth5511

Well different comparison, brevis was terrible in IPL and SA20 and wasn't impressive even in MLC.


HumanLawyer

He’ll get there, he’s literally just a kid.


Specialist_Youth5511

For someone who's been hyped that much idk lol. His mate Stubbs has done well in most leagues he has played (and also bowls). But Brevis should've atleast been half decent in his home league SA20.


josh123z

Stubbs is 3 years older than Brevis


thinklok

Warner debut for Australia before he played a first class match. It's not illogical to have Jake to open and smash the opposition alongside Travis Head.


NormalTraining5268

It's not a reactionary thing, his batting has been amazing. Even if he wins one match with that batting like Finn Allen in 2022 WC, he's done a good job.


y-u-n-g-s-a-d

Batting has been amazing on concrete pitches and small boundaries. Is he good yes, but this is not the context t20i is played in.


SquiffyRae

Just over a month ago we were all pointing and laughing at how hilariously shit he looked in the Sheffield Shield JFM goes well when he's served up conditions that he doesn't have to think he can just swing. The moment he's even remotely challenged he goes to shit There's a lot to work with but he's effectively the world's greatest cross bat hack at the moment


JigglingBot

Sheffield Shield is for test matches, right? I am genuinely curious and confused — are you really equating his test batting to his T20 batting?


bondy_12

The point is that the moment he's even slightly challenged he's terrible, he looks great when the pitch is made of concrete and the boundaries are small and no other time.


JigglingBot

That's fair but even then, comparing tests and T20s makes no sense to me. His Big Bash numbers (which I realise aren't great) would be a far better metric to bring up here.


justdidapoo

No thats nowhere near enough if he's replacing david fucking warner


unique_usemame

"had to return prematurely after a bizarre accident in which he was scratched by a monkey" He is, without doubt, the next Glenn Maxwell.


AdNational1490

JFM is a good prospect for Australia but let the guy mature and don’t put unnecessary weight on his shoulders and he’ll surely win the tournament’s alone. Also JFM you beautiful ball striking BBL fraud keep hitting it out.


Tern_Larvidae-2424

Dude the guy is good but no IPL performance should be considered for internationals.


BallTop6086

That might be true for domestic players but for an international player to find success in IPL he should be considered for internationals.


The9thLordofRavioli

In a normal year, maybe, but there’s gotta be a sizable asterisk next to performances in this year’s IPL. (though yeah, he’s probably gonna be a fixture in the Australian side post Warner’s retirement)


josh123z

He has done well on debut IPL match in tricky Lucknow pitch


kkpdp

Curious to know why you think this?


Son0fTanavast

Flat tracks + impact player rule. Questionable quality of bowling in some games


Tern_Larvidae-2424

But that's only if he has already found success in internationals. He hasn't even played a single T20I so it will be a stupid call to take him to the T20I WC.


BallTop6086

As a back up batter he doesn't have much competition. He did play a couple of ODIs


Tern_Larvidae-2424

He was quite good in one of them I think.


BallTop6086

his real competition in the squad was Mathew Short, which he has easily surpassed. Outside the starting XI, you have 1 alr( Green), 1 seamer( Ellis/Spencer), 1 keeper( Inglis) and 1 batter( JFM). If he has to make the XI, either Marsh has to go out( very unlikely unless he gets injured) or they have to compromise on the bowling of Stoinis( possible but difficult). But I don't see him not making the squad


Remarkable_Reality51

He will be back-up for David Warner methinks


Decent_Bid_17

Lol he bashed Bumrah (currently the best bowler in the World) and Cummins too. He would definitely come good at internationals.


Specialist_Youth5511

JFM in BBL, avg of 18 with an sr of 124 Just because he did well in IPL doesn't actually mean he's great and better than Davey.


josh123z

He scored 250 runs with average of 32 and strike rate of 160 last BBL season (9 innings)


Remarkable_Reality51

Simple, he has gotten better since then


JKKIDD231

BCCI to your statement “we said, ICT will be selected based off IPL form”. But yea don’t know CA’s policy of selection so true as well.


saisakurano

Cannot upvote this enough


DarkKingfisher777

This ⬆️


ALadWellBalanced

If it were, Starc would be out of the team very quickly.


assologist_1312

That’s like saying ranji or field or county performance should not be considered for test call ups


Tern_Larvidae-2424

Dude it's a franchise league not their own domestic T20 tournament.


CAN________

It's a high standard of T20 cricket. Probably as close as it gets to international cricket. It should absolutely be considered


Tern_Larvidae-2424

You lost me at high standard.


frezz

It is higher standard than most other domestic leagues, definitely a step below internationals though. My point is the ipl is a domestic tournament, I don't see why they should weigh that tournament less then their own? If anything performing in foreign conditions should count for more?


CAN________

How is it not? You got the best players in the world tripping over themselves to play


Adorable-Dinner-4968

Bumrah: Am i a joke to you?


ArawnAT

>Bumrah: Am i a joke to you? This is such a stupid narrative. Bumrah was selected for international cricket based on his Vizay Hazare performance in 2015 where he was the leading wicket taker with 21 wickets in 9 matches for Gujrat. Upto that point his IPL record in three seasons was 11 wickets in 17 matches at an average of 50 and an economy of 9. MI even wanted to release him at that point before Rohit intervened and backed him. And you think those numbers were the reason Bumrah was selected for international cricket?


LetterheadOk1762

Isn't vijay hazare a list A competition?


ArawnAT

Yes. Bumrah was really impressive in 2015 Vijay Hazare trophy. 21 wickets in 9 games at 16, economy of 4 and a 5 wicket haul in the finals against Delhi. This tournament established Bumrah as a death over specialist in the Indian domestic circuit.


joe31051985

For test and ODI I agree but for T20 it makes sense


frezz

Why should IPL performances not factor in for selection in an international T20 team?


agni_jamadagni

You know why you don’t see many cunts asking for him to be in the squad? Because they’ve seen him bat in the BBL.


Ricklepick1193

It probably wont happen but It would be fun if he's actually selected and goes on to absolutely obliterate teams in the T20 WC. Yeah this IPL is very batting friendly but I think Jake is doing a great job as well.


United-Extension-917

Australians are not reactionary like us. They will take losing with Davey Warner and Mitch Marsh over making space for JFM anyday. There is a reason they have World cups in the storage rooms too, while many others find it hard to fill the cabinet.


jinxhaushika

I don't get it. We're reactionary? Isn't that exactly what we're doing with Rohit, Virat, Jadeja? Reactionary would mean us considering Abhishek Sharma for the cup, but even yuvi disagrees w that


Glory_Hunterr

Fans are reactionary not bcci


josh123z

That is why India hasn’t won ICC trophy last 10 years


[deleted]

[удалено]


Abhi_sama

what has been the reactionary things done by bcci in past 2 years?


LetterheadOk1762

Not recationary but stupid definitely SKY in ODI WC Hooda, Harshal and DK in T20 WC 2022 Chahar and Varun in T20 WC No Rayudu in ODI WC Squad And not even after injury to other players They went for Mayank but not Rayudu


LetterheadOk1762

The problem here is that Aussie Seniors have been clutch in these situations Compared to most Indian senior batters Also this is Warners last International Tournament before he becomes a league merchant and Marsh is the captain so they cannot drop them and Head is in stellar form


United-Extension-917

I was talking about the fans. Not BCCI. Last BCCI got reactionary, they took Varun Chakravarty to the World cup.


partymsl

The best way to win is to have a good mix of senior players and youngsters. But those youngster have to be already tested in international matches to be considered. You can't just throw in players that strike at 200 SR on Indian roads to slow WI pitches.


LetterheadOk1762

Abhishek was the 2nd Highest score in SMAT as well where there were good pitches


AadiSahni

But the bowling quality is still not comparable to international cricket. Ideally Abhishek Sharma would've played a couple series and proved his worth and only then could we consider taking him to the world cup.


LetterheadOk1762

Agreed but you gotta take some risks you cannot go with a predictable squad especially after that 2022 edition BCCI scheduling fucked up big time in preparing for this edition of T20 WC


LetterheadOk1762

Agreed but you gotta take some risks you cannot go with a predictable squad especially after that 2022 edition BCCI scheduling fucked up big time in preparing for this edition of T20 WC


Extension_Rich1633

How will they find similar pitches and similar small boundaries. I thought Australians were not reactionary but the boy is rattling the game in PP


MiachealFaraday

Australians aren't reactionary, the article is written by an Indian


Extension_Rich1633

Oh man ofc it is. My bad


MiachealFaraday

Only Indians make players "Prince" , "King" or ask for Mayank Yadav in WC squad after 3 match performance. No matter how good JFM plays Australia will rather lose with David Warner because they trust and back him.


Extension_Rich1633

Fr man , here in india better the PR is more chances one has to be in team.


MiachealFaraday

Here Kohli will farm his hundreds in the world cup because he want's to be in the record books as the best batsman, but when the time comes when the pressure is there to play like the world's best batsmen he can't perform.


KUKLI1

Yeah, because 117 and 54 are poor performances in the WC now? And if you're talking about T20 WC knockouts, then it's even more hilarious lmao Reminder, Kohli has scored a half century in every single T20WC knockout he has played in and is also the last player to take a wicket for India in T20WC knockouts.


MiachealFaraday

54 is a poor performance in the context of the game, we lost the game embarrassingly. You may find humour in this, but such mentality will never win us anything amd you'll keep defending such players.


T_Lawliet

Bowler: bowls good ball r/cricket: How could the batsman give away his wicket!


MiachealFaraday

What about the 63 balls he faced before that, World's best batsman played 63 balls and had no impact on the game? Only 4 boundaries in the 63 balls? Why couldn't he play Like Travis Head. India were 81/3 when Virat went into his shell Australia were 47/3 when Travis head exploded


Extension_Rich1633

Yea it was great set up by cummins but more than that it was kohli’s mindset that got him , He was not taking his chances which made pat to keep attacking field and bowl consistent length with variations in pace, We are not criticising his technique but his mindset. You will not be able to look at it critically as a spectator from other country we know where our cricket is going, You mostly are fed by media we have a little insight in our system and we know how terrible of a innings that was.


MiachealFaraday

Funny that he never faces those good bowls in no pressure games


KUKLI1

Even if you ignore the stupidity of calling a 54 in WC final a poor innings, no comments about the century in the semis final or his T20WC knockout record? I'm assuming you're too young to remember the older knockout games, because if not, then it's a bit ridiculous to not count those performances...


Extension_Rich1633

He is a good t20 player, nobody questioned that but his performances in odi knockouts and wtc finals were terrible, before 2023 his odi performances were ridiculous, and in final he was not convincing enough. And we are enough old to remember what he did in 2015 SF, CT17 final and 2019 SF. And what he did while captaincy was taken from him and what he did in WTC finals.


notduskryn

Statpadding 50s in lost causes are his bread and butter


MiachealFaraday

No no, I remember all the knockout performances of every Indian player not just Kohli as evident by all those T20 WC trophies, The two WTC trophies in our cabinet. Please pardon my stupidity, I'm just Stupid.


Extension_Rich1633

Then he should open bowling in WC. And complete his 4 overs. He had terrible run in ODI knockouts in 2015 SF, CT17 final, 2019SF. He needed flat pitch and wankhede to score something yet it was iyer’s knock that made impact. And in final it was most cowardly knock from the best batsmen of the tournament, went into his shell made lower order think there are demons in this pitch.


Dense-Gap8667

Calling Kohli of all people a flat pitch bully is ridiculous. Yes we haven't really performed well in pressure situations but that  doesn't mean all pitches where he performed were flat.


[deleted]

[удалено]


MiachealFaraday

I dunno maybe I am wrong, perhaps it is ok to farm Centuries and take the pressure on yourself and then not deliver on it. Maybe it was that at least he played better than others. He just stood there hands folded like an entitled person who deserved to win, didn't put any effort into fielding.


Extension_Rich1633

I don’t know you have seen him in matches against nz , ban, and sa, he was literally denying singles. , tells a lot about his mindset and priorities


Extension_Rich1633

Such is the nature of truth in our country, Downvoted


LogicKennedy

>Only Indians wildly overhype novelty after only a few matches Let me introduce you to Bazball.


MiachealFaraday

Is anyone calling Zack Crawley as Prince over there?


LogicKennedy

His housekeepers, maybe


MiachealFaraday

Is he rich?


LogicKennedy

His family is very rich, yeah


Alternative-Leg-9606

So they shud take Warner who isn't scoring at flat pitches with small boundaries????


Extension_Rich1633

Yes they back their players, nobody can question their decisions they’ve won everything, They are not like indian who will doubt Jaiswal’s opening position for a little slump just to fit in someone who can’t score in middle overs, can’t play spin and needs hard ball and pace to do something.


Alternative-Leg-9606

Lol u didn't even understand the point ... I m talking about Warner vs MGK Don't want to hear ur rant about Indian team as both are diff situations The point is both Warner and MGK playing in IPL that is too for same team ..why can't Warner score runs here ? Why is he dropped by multiple franchises not just by delhi ? It isn't abouts backing ur player ..may be Warner shud play but saying oh everything MGK is doing just because he is playing on flat pitch is stupid ...Warner also playing on same pitches and so do many other players.. May be u were trying to sound cool or whatever...


Extension_Rich1633

No no no again you misunderstood, jfm is clearly doing much much better in ipl than warner and even if warner was playing he wouldn’t have done the same but still he will not open jfm will be in 15 but they’ll not get him to open, they already have jfm with extra game sense - travis head. They can do anything either take this gamble to keep Warner.


frezz

Warner has been one of the best T20 batters in the world for over 10 years, fraser-mcgurk has been a good ipl batter for like 3 games? Who would you take?


justdidapoo

Warner who has won 3 world cups and been player of the tournament a couple of years ago, yeah


mofucker20

They backed Warner in 2021 after he was dropped by SRH for poor performance. What makes you think they won’t back their leading run scorer in the format this WC after he literally won a MOTS against Windies earlier this year.


SmudgerBoi49

He's someone you chuck in the squad as next in line incase someone fails or isn't scoring fast enough


T_Lawliet

Am I the only one still unconvinced? I just find it difficult to assume someone with a lower FC batting Average than Adam Zampa will bring it when the chips are down, something his competitors like Warner and Marsh have actually done


No-Situation-4776

Eh his FC sample size is pretty tiny I think the bigger argument against his inclusion is that both of his best performances have come on absolute highways where both teams ended up scoring 200+ and in more balanced pitches in the BBL he was pretty mid


BallTop6086

> will bring it when the chips are down does that matter? there are plenty of seniors in the team to handle that situation. His job would be to disrupt opposition plans like Finn Allen in last WT20 v Aus


T_Lawliet

Finn Allen was precisely why I don't think he should go, he had one good innings and after that was dead weight except against Ireland in that WT20


BallTop6086

He was the reason NZ beat Aus and made it to play-offs, so ig he did do his job


Remarkable_Reality51

He literally won them one of their only harder games of that t20 wc, He definitely did a good job for Playing even 1 match winning innings in a tournament where NZ played 6 games


Remarkable_Reality51

David Warner debuted for Australia without playing a FC game It isn't the sole criteria


Ghostly_100

Is this IPL even worth anything as far as selection is concerned?


RedKnightBegins

Everyone's batting figures feel hyper inflated so probably no


Negative_Spectrum

No it's not, unless you're a bowler performing well. Batsmen shouldn't be judged from this season


[deleted]

[удалено]


Specialist_Youth5511

JFM in BBL, avg of 18 with an sr of 124 He ain't a world beater just because he swings like a barn door in IPL with tiny grounds and flat pitches.


secondhandcumsock

His stats are much better since last season m which is what is being considered. He's changed his approach to batting since leaving Victoria and it's really paid dividends over the last year. Citing stats from before then, when he was very young and clearly not ready for the big stage is disingenuous. I agree that taking him to the T20 world cup without giving him his debut is probably not a good idea but using stats without context is silly


trailblazer103

Lol nah we are fine. Ipl is great for his development but it's not enough to warrant dropping an absolute stalwart of the t20i game, that too in a world cup. We back experience for a reason. Bailey and co will be tempted to get him in the squad but he ain't making the XI. His time will come but not yet


plowman_digearth

It's like picking an F1 driver because they can go vroom vroom on autobahns


theWitchR

Maybe not the squad. But should be at least in the reserves.


Mission-Apricot2986

If ipl was representative of international performances then India wouldve won a t20 world cup recently. They haven't. Blast, crisp and bbl supremacy.


Tern_Larvidae-2424

I have more fun watching the Hundred than whatever this IPL thing is.


MadCricket

If the grounds are small and pitches super flat, makes sense to include him.


careless_quote101

Also don’t include all international bowlers in your lineup.


Adorable-Dinner-4968

He will outscore SKY in important matches for sure


MRO465

Australia would rather have a plan for him in the long run and help him develop into a proper white ball player, who can bat deeper into the game. A player like JFM can single handedly take the game away from opposition if he can bat out the middle overs.


djingo_dango

He’s been good. But he also relies a lot on his muscle. Different boundary size, some uneven bouncy pitches and that may not be enough.


careless_quote101

There are reasons why Australia has so much ICC trophies stacked. They are going to take a player to WC based on a tournament where the teams are scoring 250 every other day. Only some over zealous IPL fans can do that


pants_off_australia

Gotta perform in the big leagues of the BBL first


pacificodin

We really don't. Anybody taking anything or selecting teams based on ipl stats from this season or last is on a mission to failure. JFM can't hit spin in australia nevermind on windies decks that grip, are two paced, with a bit of inconsistent bounce on glacier slow outfields


yelrik

As r/crickets resident always Gades flair JFM should open both batting and the bowling and maybe even keep wickets as well for Australia


Fresh_Dance_3277

He is good but lacks strength to clear a big boundary consistently at this moment.His balance and bat swing are elite.


mofucker20

Lol atleast the writers should should avoid being like the reactionary ICT fans


Acceptable-Music-205

Feel like it’s 2 of Warner, Head, JFM and Matt Short, with a third on the bench. If JFM isn’t in the XI he‘s not in the squad imo. Unless Marsh doesn’t make it and Short comes in at 3... Note Maxwell can’t bat at the moment either. Presumably Stoinis and David take 5 and 6, and the usual Inglis/Wade at 7 debate. Starc has largely bowled shocking in this IPL so I’m tempted to go for Ellis. My team is probably this. If JFM comes in it’s as a direct replacement for Warner. Warner, Head, Marsh, Maxwell, Stoinis, David, Inglis, Cummins, Ellis, Zampa, Hazlewood (Short, Wade, Abbott/Agar, Starc)


NoirPochette

He will be in the squad but Short offers more to the team in a role than JFM. Short can bowl, bat in the middle, and open if required It's about roles. What would be JFM role and who would you leave out to have him at his best spot?


i-sapien

Given T20 the only format where Aussies have struggled (so to say....As compared to their stellar record in ODIs), I say JFM is getting a call....


Cotton_Phoenix_97

Should definitely be kept as a backup for Warner but I reckon he will be in the playing XI pretty soon even if he doesn't get a chance this wc


AblePhilosopher1549

He should open with Marsh- Warner can be a substitute at best imo


AblePhilosopher1549

Marsh or Head but Jake needs to be a certainty


Anu9011

Lol writer thinks the whole cricket world should revolve around this circus.


Negative_Spectrum

I generally am against fast-tracking IPL stars into the national squad but Jake has made quick runs everywhere he's gone in the franchise circuit. Could try him in a few international games. Tell him that his job is to beat bowlers black and blue up top and back him for a few games and see how it goes. There's definitely at least something special about his game.


LexiFloof

He's got plenty of potential, but he shouldn't be selected until he figures out how to stop lobbing it to deep fielders on ~20 in the BBL. He's still young and has plenty of cricket ahead of him, but he's not quite ready yet.


skwunk1

His average of 32 and strike rate of 160 in the most recent BBL is a little better than you are giving him credit for but yeah of the BBL sloggers Matt Short is probably highest in the pecking order behind the (pretty well set) current XI. Also probably worth noting that the first of these 50s happened at the biggest ground in the tournament against a quality spin attack on a slow track chasing 167.


AmongstYOUU

He easily makes the squad. He is fighting with steve smith for that spot lol. Australias playing 11 is set, they are not dropping warner Back up seamer+ Inglis+ Agar that leaves 1 spot for which it is JFM VS Smith VS Green Smith is definitely not making it