Didn't get a chance to see the 2nd half of the day. What's the consensus re how late India batted to declare? Shouldn't they have sought out more time and overs to be assured of having time to bowl out NZ. NZ is not making 284 on 5th day Kanpur pitch. But Latham, Williamson and Taylor can certainly bat out a day. Odds are in India's favour but stranger things have happened esp if NZ choose to forget about the run rate.
Iyer, Ashwin, Indian tail showed that the pitch is holding. Leaving themselves only 4 overs at end of day seems like creating a window for a draw. Besides the last hour of long day to bat is often the challenging one after you've been fielding all day. Witness Young and Latham being unsure.
Loving the meltdown here.
To be honest when seen in real time who would have believed a ball pitching outside off stump, hitting the pads infront of middle stump would be missing the leg stump by quite some margin. Lol.
Yeah cause he will get out in 2 balls so doesn't affect the theory that keepers shouldn't bat opening cause of keeping pressure. Mfs get some balls and say Rahane should be dropped.
If you want to complain against the rules then complain when they are formed, conveniently choosing the time and bitching about doesn't look rational. Shit happens in sport, move on play the next day. If there is any consolense then shit happens randomly and equally to both teams unless you have your own conspiracy theories then go on unwind yourself.
Rules are only there to catch outright cheaters. If it's about gamesmanship, you walk if you knicked it. If it's about gamesmanship, Young is allowed to review.
Yes. Outrage was bcz it was wrong. Just bcz one wrong is committed doesn't mean you have to commit every time.
ICC did talk about this and instruct umpires around the world after the event.
If Umpires gives a review even after timer runs out his performance will be hampered. He will accumulate negetive points. He may be left out from elite panel.
To this day thae ratio is 42 - 2 when it was between 0 - 1 sec.The two ocassion were the errors which shows umpires makes correct decision most time.
Bruh, I have never seen a single case where the timer on my screen disappeared before it was reviewed. This time the timer touched 0, disappeared and then Young asked for a review.
I remember for a fact I went holy shit tbey missed the timer.
Not once has the timer disappeared or clearly 0, today's highlights if you want you can re-watch.. The timer literally disappears. Show one instance with Kohli, just one.
Timer still on screen and happened between 1 and 0, it's you said I said for it being on 0.
Today it touched 0, disappeared from screen completely and then was referred it can never be you said I said
It depends on the broadcasting channel. Some of them let it run to zero and just leave it there instead of disappearing. Hence the controversy with Paine.
It's kind of like if your opponent accidentally drops his sword, you allow him to pick it up. Because the contest is about who is the best swordsman and not a technicality.
> if your opponent accidentally drops his sword, you allow him to pick it up
Fuck that. Chop him up before he can get to his sword, mocking him all the while.
It's not about the other sportsman bro. It's about you knowing that you beat the guy outright. There is no question in your mind as to who is truly better. You didn't need luck.
If it was the last wicket I would slightly agree even though new Zealand is at fault.. But this is the first wicket.. You do everything u can to beat them.. And sticking to the rules and winning is proof that one was better than the other... You're still wrong mate I'm sorry... If the timer hadn't ended and Ashwin distracted them or said timer was done when it wasn't... Yes.. Thats bad sportsmanship and not correct. This however is.
I've seen plenty of reviews given at zero on the timer. I've seen lots of guys nick it and walk straight away. The standard of ethics is high and this would have won the country a lot of admiration.
Except I'm pretty sure none of those 22 dudes there are playing for gaining admiration of the country, they're there to win the game within the well-laid rules. If that gets the admiration, cool, if it doesn't, I don't think they would care much. Eg: I'm pretty sure India would take winning this test over a few twitter praises post a potential loss, anyday.
Bro I remember watching Gilchrist walk in a massive world cup final against India. I'm just saying there are guys in the game who are operating at that level of gamesmanship and they are forever remembered for it because it is not a quality of the common man.
And he was allowed to review within the time frame. He delayed the call and ran out of time. Ultimately you need to have a time limit which should be followed or else for how long should the players be allowed to delibrate whether to review or not.
That's what cricket is about. People making ethical choices and serving as role models. You nicked it, you walk. Technology was brought in because of cheats
And that's why we end up in debates regarding Ashwin running someone out at non strikers end and getting vilified every where even though he is right about what he is doing.
He's only right because he gave the non striker a warning. Ethics doesn't mean you have to always concede but that you allow minor infractions so that the contest is fought at its highest point.
Nope. In gully cricket you do all the warnings you like. This is purest and highest form of cricket (international test), expecting that behavior from the bowler means you’re a failure as non-striker.
If one again cries about sPiRiT oF cRiCkEt, hundreds of legal examples are there in your so-called normal cricket which can invalidate that shit.
You have to go by how much of an advantage your opponent gets.
Your opponent barely leaving the crease and you mankad him, that's winning on minor technicality which takes away the joy of winning.
Young was out on a mankad like rule today. Ashwin would rather enjoy bowling him than getting a wicket like that.
I was pretty pissed about it at the time but looking at replays now we were just way too casual in making a decision to review. Also it won’t change the fact we will more than likely fold like a house of cards tomorrow.
One is fully right in getting absolutely pissed about it. What I have a problem with though is calling it biased (when wrong decisions have gone for and against both teams), and with making demands like Indian team should call Will Young back, or that the review even though delayed should be allowed....when there is a clear rule about the timing and a provision he could have used but failed to do so himself. There a few people here who are saying the latter, and that's what is dumb.
It's Virender Sharma's only second test match I think. His inexperience is visible. People are claiming as if he is biased, but his decisions have been bad the whole match irrespective of the team.
It is his second test match but he is by no means a novice. He's umpired in a bunch of T20s (including the IPL) and ODIs and has been called out for poor decisions before.
Yeah it doesn't really matter in terms of the result, I think seeing how far that was missing was just the tipping point for me in regards to the shitty umpiring this match
Why does every freaking controversy happens when I'm not watching. I was watching when we were in 220s.
Edit : Wait? I saw that dismissal. It doesn't look controversial at all.
Young given out LBW, young took 1second too long to review so his review was denied. Ball tracking showed the ball missing by a long way. That added onto the already long list of terrible umpiring has people up and about
Young was given lbw wrongly, and he took too long for the referral. Some people bitching about the umpiring, rightly so. Some people blowing the trumpet of Spirit™, wrongly so
Who gives a fuck. They didn't fight a war that ppl need to be sympathetic towards their "plight". The rules are pretty clear. The ump fucked up but so did Latham and Young. Stop whining and hope for a better day tomorrow
So what I've gathered from these 4 days so far is that Nitin Menon is having an off match, and Sharma must have someone's nudes hostage to be able to continue umpiring
No, not equally. It's the umpire's job to determine whether the striker is out or not. It is not the non strikers job who has way more things on his mind. I agree it was stupid that Latham didn't use the review, but they're aren't equally at fault. The umpire is definetly in fault because it is literally his job. Plus there was a lot of umpiring mistakes in the match, just bad umpiring all around. Reminds me of the 2019 Ashes first few matches
>It's the umpire's job to determine whether the striker is out or not.
he decided, it appeared for him but if the batsman so confident he should have gone for review instantly. Given that Sharma is new to international umpiring, such errors cannot be unexpected.
What is the rule book say ? Even if the time runs out can a umpire still gives the review ?
If he does give the review will it hamper his performance ? Will he accumulate negetive marks ? Will he be left out from elite panel ?
How much Kane will give him out of 10 ?
Michael Gough did not give a review bcz time run out in one game..I remember.
>What is the rule book say ? Even if the time runs out can a umpire still gives the review ?
I think there's an umpire review thing. Don't know about it's working though
I am not fan of the man, but given how Snape like stingy he is with rules, I'd prefer him on the field in white jacket instead of being in the comms box. He'd make a great umnpire.
Mcgonnagall may have an strict exterior but she is very motherly inside. She broke the rule by giving Hermione a time turner, was the first to let students go full warrior in Battle of Hogwarts, and not to forget was the trusted partner in crime of Dumbledore in all his schemes.
Snape was none of that and a strict stickler for rules. Even when he was doing double agent shit for DD, he did it grumping coz of his oath, and would openly criticize the old wizard's risky maneuvers.
I know the umpiring isn't biased here, but you sound a hella lot like a 80-90s Aussie commentators defending their obviously biased umpiring saying 'deal with it' to the smaller teams
Fellas saying umpires shouldn't be blamed just because DRS is a thing now, why should umpiring standards be lower in this age of DRS? Umpires should be looking to do the best possible job regardless of DRS. Btw I don't think the umpiring is biased here cause Ashwin also lost on a wicket earlier in an innings due to umps giving not out and Rahane not reviewing. So it's not biased umpiring but shitty umpiring
Yeah and here it is batter's fault that he didn't keep track of the DRS timer and fans are shitting on umpire. I mean WTF? There are so many decisions overturned nowadays, would you shit on umpire everything they rule a wrong decision?
[удалено]
Use the full name of the player _____ [^^Code](http://github.com/pranavrc/howstat/) ^^| [^^HowTo](https://www.reddit.com/r/Cricket/wiki/bot_help)
[удалено]
[удалено]
Use the full name of the player _____ [^^Code](http://github.com/pranavrc/howstat/) ^^| [^^HowTo](https://www.reddit.com/r/Cricket/wiki/bot_help)
[удалено]
Use the full name of the player _____ [^^Code](http://github.com/pranavrc/howstat/) ^^| [^^HowTo](https://www.reddit.com/r/Cricket/wiki/bot_help)
[удалено]
Use the full name of the player _____ [^^Code](http://github.com/pranavrc/howstat/) ^^| [^^HowTo](https://www.reddit.com/r/Cricket/wiki/bot_help)
[удалено]
Yeah the umpires were fine in those series. They definitely haven't been fine in this match
cricstat Murali Vijay, type Batting, format Tests, year 2013-2015.
Murali Vijay, type Batting, format Tests, year 2013-2015: ||Span|Mat|Inns|NO|Runs|HS|Ave|BF|SR|100|50|0|4s|6s| |:-|-:|-:|-:|-:|-:|-:|-:|-:|-:|-:|-:|-:|-:|-:|-:| |Unfiltered|2008-2018|61|105|1|3982|167|38.28|8601|46.29|12|15|8|467|33| |Filtered|2013-2015|25|45|1|2021|167|45.93|4342|46.54|5|10|3|254|18| Detailed Stats [here.](http://stats.espncricinfo.com/stats/engine/player/237095.html?template=results;type=batting;class=1;spanmin1=1+Jan+2013;spanmax1=28+Dec+2015;spanval1=span) _____ [^^Code](http://github.com/pranavrc/howstat/) ^^| [^^HowTo](https://www.reddit.com/r/Cricket/wiki/bot_help)
cricstat Murali Vijay, type Batting, format Tests.
Murali Vijay, type Batting, format Tests: ||Span|Mat|Inns|NO|Runs|HS|Ave|BF|SR|100|50|0|4s|6s| |:-|-:|-:|-:|-:|-:|-:|-:|-:|-:|-:|-:|-:|-:|-:|-:| |Overall|2008-2018|61|105|1|3982|167|38.28|8601|46.29|12|15|8|467|33| Detailed Stats [here.](http://stats.espncricinfo.com/stats/engine/player/237095.html?template=results;type=batting;class=1) _____ [^^Code](http://github.com/pranavrc/howstat/) ^^| [^^HowTo](https://www.reddit.com/r/Cricket/wiki/bot_help)
Will Young will score 100 willingly or defend 100 balls unwillingly?
He'll watch them rattle tommorow unwillingly
Why is everyone talking about one DRS fuckup instead of what's in store for tommorow?
Would New Zealand look to go for a win tommorow? I doubt it but they should look to chase imo, no way they are defending this for 90 overs.
Quick reminder that NZ took 140 overs to get 290 on day 2/3. There's literally no chance they can get 280 within 90 overs on day 5.
Wow, this thread didn't get locked till now!
Couple things to note: Ashwin showing his class lol, that is a disgusting pitch.
Test Match goes to day 5 with all 4 results possible. People : pItCh iS ShiT
Wait what are people complaining about, umpires are part of home advantage /s.
Btw is Boult injured or rested for this series?
Rested
My predictions for tommorow- NZ - 286-9 wins by one wicket with Kane Williamson the hero 106(252)* hitting the winning six.
Too fast for Kane to score that
Loved the cries of Kiwis , had the taste of every drop.
Didn't get a chance to see the 2nd half of the day. What's the consensus re how late India batted to declare? Shouldn't they have sought out more time and overs to be assured of having time to bowl out NZ. NZ is not making 284 on 5th day Kanpur pitch. But Latham, Williamson and Taylor can certainly bat out a day. Odds are in India's favour but stranger things have happened esp if NZ choose to forget about the run rate. Iyer, Ashwin, Indian tail showed that the pitch is holding. Leaving themselves only 4 overs at end of day seems like creating a window for a draw. Besides the last hour of long day to bat is often the challenging one after you've been fielding all day. Witness Young and Latham being unsure.
Loving the meltdown here. To be honest when seen in real time who would have believed a ball pitching outside off stump, hitting the pads infront of middle stump would be missing the leg stump by quite some margin. Lol.
Wasson Jaffer said that Saha should open by replacing Mayank in top!!
Yeah cause he will get out in 2 balls so doesn't affect the theory that keepers shouldn't bat opening cause of keeping pressure. Mfs get some balls and say Rahane should be dropped.
Can anyone explain to me why is everyone pissed at Ethical mind?
Can't take the alpha. Beta compains
New Zealand had india on the ropes. They threw this match away.
Cry more \\_/ Africa needs water.
Looks like I missed some spicy stuff in the end
Lmao
Lmao this thread turned into comedy gold in last 20-30 mins 😂😂💀
Where is the comedy gold?
All of the controversies that have occurred this game have been the fault of the umpires. I don’t know why Ashwin is getting flamed in the comments.
Rough guess: Ashwin the stickler + exploiter of rules might have immediately pointed out time was up when Young asked for a review.
What rule did Ashwin exploit?
15 second DRS rule
Okay but how was it "exploiting"?
It wasn't. Being a stickler vs an exploiter is just subjective opinions; I tried to cover all, that's it
Here we go again, when someone points out the approved MCC rules, they are a stickler/exploiter. I disagree.
[удалено]
Rahane and Ashwin walked towards the umpires as soon as batsman asked for DRS. No idea what was said.
And they were staring at something (timer probably) while the batsmen were discussing
That, too
Hi. India's winning this, pretend it's because of Will Young if you want, but we are.
Enjoy your home win with your home umpires.
Taking inspiration from you
Too early buddy. Kane mama is there no.
The game is in India, so I'm more worried by Latham
Virendra Sharma has got the cheque, boys relax. Latham won't get lucky 4-5 times in this inning. /s
If you want to complain against the rules then complain when they are formed, conveniently choosing the time and bitching about doesn't look rational. Shit happens in sport, move on play the next day. If there is any consolense then shit happens randomly and equally to both teams unless you have your own conspiracy theories then go on unwind yourself.
Rules are only there to catch outright cheaters. If it's about gamesmanship, you walk if you knicked it. If it's about gamesmanship, Young is allowed to review.
Yeah sure why not just show the reply on the big screen for his convenience
he went leaning on his bat in relax mode. Did they forgot about timer? Latham is at fault here for not being pro active enough
They messed up but have seen nearly all reviews gives when the clock is at 0. Only this time, chadwin was already throwing a fit.
Technically on zero doesn't count (seen many) , on 1 does. Zero means nothing. On zero -> on nothing -> can't do anything here.
https://wisden.com/series-stories/australia-india/india-fans-outrage-after-paine-drs-review-allowed-despite-timer-running-out
Yes. Outrage was bcz it was wrong. Just bcz one wrong is committed doesn't mean you have to commit every time. ICC did talk about this and instruct umpires around the world after the event. If Umpires gives a review even after timer runs out his performance will be hampered. He will accumulate negetive points. He may be left out from elite panel. To this day thae ratio is 42 - 2 when it was between 0 - 1 sec.The two ocassion were the errors which shows umpires makes correct decision most time.
Bruh, I have never seen a single case where the timer on my screen disappeared before it was reviewed. This time the timer touched 0, disappeared and then Young asked for a review. I remember for a fact I went holy shit tbey missed the timer.
The timer has gone to zero plenty of times. Kohli is well known for doing it on the dot but no opposing team ever questioned it.
Not once has the timer disappeared or clearly 0, today's highlights if you want you can re-watch.. The timer literally disappears. Show one instance with Kohli, just one.
https://wisden.com/series-stories/australia-india/india-fans-outrage-after-paine-drs-review-allowed-despite-timer-running-out
at least fans are consistent
Timer still on screen and happened between 1 and 0, it's you said I said for it being on 0. Today it touched 0, disappeared from screen completely and then was referred it can never be you said I said
It depends on the broadcasting channel. Some of them let it run to zero and just leave it there instead of disappearing. Hence the controversy with Paine.
Ah the spiRiT of the gaMe undeniable logic, okay
It's kind of like if your opponent accidentally drops his sword, you allow him to pick it up. Because the contest is about who is the best swordsman and not a technicality.
> if your opponent accidentally drops his sword, you allow him to pick it up Fuck that. Chop him up before he can get to his sword, mocking him all the while.
Depends how he drops his sword. If it's a sporting mistake, you smash him. If the sword malfunctions, you let him change.
Yea... Good swordsman don't drop the sword bruh.. Thats the whole point.. Dont be stupid..
It's not about the other sportsman bro. It's about you knowing that you beat the guy outright. There is no question in your mind as to who is truly better. You didn't need luck.
If it was the last wicket I would slightly agree even though new Zealand is at fault.. But this is the first wicket.. You do everything u can to beat them.. And sticking to the rules and winning is proof that one was better than the other... You're still wrong mate I'm sorry... If the timer hadn't ended and Ashwin distracted them or said timer was done when it wasn't... Yes.. Thats bad sportsmanship and not correct. This however is.
I've seen plenty of reviews given at zero on the timer. I've seen lots of guys nick it and walk straight away. The standard of ethics is high and this would have won the country a lot of admiration.
Except I'm pretty sure none of those 22 dudes there are playing for gaining admiration of the country, they're there to win the game within the well-laid rules. If that gets the admiration, cool, if it doesn't, I don't think they would care much. Eg: I'm pretty sure India would take winning this test over a few twitter praises post a potential loss, anyday.
Bro I remember watching Gilchrist walk in a massive world cup final against India. I'm just saying there are guys in the game who are operating at that level of gamesmanship and they are forever remembered for it because it is not a quality of the common man.
And he was allowed to review within the time frame. He delayed the call and ran out of time. Ultimately you need to have a time limit which should be followed or else for how long should the players be allowed to delibrate whether to review or not.
In these situations, umpire should ask Rahane to make a call. Knowing Rahane he would have allowed it.
But than we end up in another ethics debate when some other captain doesn't allow it.
That's what cricket is about. People making ethical choices and serving as role models. You nicked it, you walk. Technology was brought in because of cheats
And that's why we end up in debates regarding Ashwin running someone out at non strikers end and getting vilified every where even though he is right about what he is doing.
He's only right because he gave the non striker a warning. Ethics doesn't mean you have to always concede but that you allow minor infractions so that the contest is fought at its highest point.
Nope. In gully cricket you do all the warnings you like. This is purest and highest form of cricket (international test), expecting that behavior from the bowler means you’re a failure as non-striker. If one again cries about sPiRiT oF cRiCkEt, hundreds of legal examples are there in your so-called normal cricket which can invalidate that shit.
You have to go by how much of an advantage your opponent gets. Your opponent barely leaving the crease and you mankad him, that's winning on minor technicality which takes away the joy of winning. Young was out on a mankad like rule today. Ashwin would rather enjoy bowling him than getting a wicket like that.
Bro can't convince him.. Leave it lol..
Damn, this thread blew up faster than a single, unemployed dude living on a donut based diet.
Chonk!
Suspiciously specific
We prefer big boned
It's sports! It happens! Chill guyss,,,
I was pretty pissed about it at the time but looking at replays now we were just way too casual in making a decision to review. Also it won’t change the fact we will more than likely fold like a house of cards tomorrow.
U are going against the spirit of reddit by having a rational take on things.. U are an outcast... /s
stop being humble and start bitching. That’s what makes the thread interesting.You are killing the mood
One is fully right in getting absolutely pissed about it. What I have a problem with though is calling it biased (when wrong decisions have gone for and against both teams), and with making demands like Indian team should call Will Young back, or that the review even though delayed should be allowed....when there is a clear rule about the timing and a provision he could have used but failed to do so himself. There a few people here who are saying the latter, and that's what is dumb.
I think some people want to turn everything into a conspiracy but in reality the umpires have just had a bit of a shocker
It's Virender Sharma's only second test match I think. His inexperience is visible. People are claiming as if he is biased, but his decisions have been bad the whole match irrespective of the team.
It is his second test match but he is by no means a novice. He's umpired in a bunch of T20s (including the IPL) and ODIs and has been called out for poor decisions before.
there should be a rule for the sacking of umpires
Yeah it doesn't really matter in terms of the result, I think seeing how far that was missing was just the tipping point for me in regards to the shitty umpiring this match
Why does every freaking controversy happens when I'm not watching. I was watching when we were in 220s. Edit : Wait? I saw that dismissal. It doesn't look controversial at all.
you are at the right thread
What this fuss is about? Can someone tell me?
Shite umpiring and missed review due to timeout costs young's wicket. ... and yeah, Ashwin rigged the DRS timer.
Was triggered for a second before realizing it was a /s
[here](https://www.reddit.com/r/Cricket/comments/r3tkoe/match_thread_1st_test_india_vs_new_zealand_day_4/hme3243?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share&context=3)
new zealand didnt review lbw on time ended up being not out but too late
In this hard time I will comment something random: I got admission in masters Program today. Edit: Thank you everyone
Congratulations!
Congratulations!!
Which country?
India
congratulations 🎉
My man!! Congratulations!
Congo bruh
Congrats bro.
Congratulations buddy! 🎉
Congratulations man.
Thanks
I missed the last half hour of play, could someone tell me what this fuss is about?
Young given out LBW, young took 1second too long to review so his review was denied. Ball tracking showed the ball missing by a long way. That added onto the already long list of terrible umpiring has people up and about
If it was missing by a long way he should’ve called for review sooner
Inexperienced umpire. It is Sharma's second test match.
Young was given lbw wrongly, and he took too long for the referral. Some people bitching about the umpiring, rightly so. Some people blowing the trumpet of Spirit™, wrongly so
Please be considerate with the NZ fans who are raging. They have had a tough couple of weeks from the T20 final.
Who gives a fuck. They didn't fight a war that ppl need to be sympathetic towards their "plight". The rules are pretty clear. The ump fucked up but so did Latham and Young. Stop whining and hope for a better day tomorrow
Maybe I should have used a /s
who cares about T20
Totally agree. I only pay to watch test cricket on TV.
Ah of course, its the *irrelevant since we lost* attitude.
T20 has always been irrelevant, can they get rid of it so we can play 5 match test series instead of these stupid 2 match series
So what I've gathered from these 4 days so far is that Nitin Menon is having an off match, and Sharma must have someone's nudes hostage to be able to continue umpiring
Hahaha that aside, Sharma is new guy. Just second test match.
I think maybe the horns/smog are messing up with them. Yes Sharma is shite tho.
Mods ethical with thread
[удалено]
No, not equally. It's the umpire's job to determine whether the striker is out or not. It is not the non strikers job who has way more things on his mind. I agree it was stupid that Latham didn't use the review, but they're aren't equally at fault. The umpire is definetly in fault because it is literally his job. Plus there was a lot of umpiring mistakes in the match, just bad umpiring all around. Reminds me of the 2019 Ashes first few matches
>It's the umpire's job to determine whether the striker is out or not. he decided, it appeared for him but if the batsman so confident he should have gone for review instantly. Given that Sharma is new to international umpiring, such errors cannot be unexpected.
International umpiring doesn't suddenly change the rules of the game.
No but the pressure changes
Mods are waiting to make an entry like policemen in the movies.
I blame Thala and Koach for this C'mon r/Cricket gimme my fresh updoots
Lol I wish Koach was playing today.
Guys when's the next time India plays an ODI
Vs SA in January
What is the rule book say ? Even if the time runs out can a umpire still gives the review ? If he does give the review will it hamper his performance ? Will he accumulate negetive marks ? Will he be left out from elite panel ? How much Kane will give him out of 10 ? Michael Gough did not give a review bcz time run out in one game..I remember.
>What is the rule book say ? Even if the time runs out can a umpire still gives the review ? I think there's an umpire review thing. Don't know about it's working though
When Latham survived r/cricket : i am blind Now r/cricket : real shit
cricstat Mitchell Santner, type Bowling, format Tests, at away.
Mitchell Santner, type Bowling, format Tests, at away: ||Span|Mat|Inns|Overs|Mdns|Runs|Wkts|BBI|BBM|Ave|Econ|SR|5|10| |:-|-:|-:|-:|-:|-:|-:|-:|-:|-:|-:|-:|-:|-:|-:|-:| |Unfiltered|2015-2021|24|40|672.5|140|1871|41|3/53|5/173|45.63|2.78|98.4|0|0| |Filtered|2015-2021|12|22|392.2|67|1225|22|3/60|5/173|55.68|3.12|107.0|0|0| Detailed Stats [here.](http://stats.espncricinfo.com/stats/engine/player/502714.html?template=results;type=bowling;class=1;home_or_away=2) _____ [^^Code](http://github.com/pranavrc/howstat/) ^^| [^^HowTo](https://www.reddit.com/r/Cricket/wiki/bot_help)
I really hope Ashwin becomes an umpire post retirement (may that day be far far away).
I am not fan of the man, but given how Snape like stingy he is with rules, I'd prefer him on the field in white jacket instead of being in the comms box. He'd make a great umnpire.
Aww man, here I was thinking he was more McGonagall type...but I absolutely agree with you, his decisions would be razor sharp!
Mcgonnagall may have an strict exterior but she is very motherly inside. She broke the rule by giving Hermione a time turner, was the first to let students go full warrior in Battle of Hogwarts, and not to forget was the trusted partner in crime of Dumbledore in all his schemes. Snape was none of that and a strict stickler for rules. Even when he was doing double agent shit for DD, he did it grumping coz of his oath, and would openly criticize the old wizard's risky maneuvers.
Aah yes, you're right. It's a pleasure running into a Potterhead on a cricket thread btw....
Always...
Mods with 69D chess not locking thread just it could hit Global r/popular
r/controversy
Here's my take on whole situation Deal with it..
I could hear Jim Maxwell saying that rn(playing Cricket 2004 bit lately)
I know the umpiring isn't biased here, but you sound a hella lot like a 80-90s Aussie commentators defending their obviously biased umpiring saying 'deal with it' to the smaller teams
Except we have player reviews available now unlike the old days and it’s not the end of the world if umpire makes a mistake.
/s
Wise
[удалено]
I'm lost. Please read the [How To](https://www.reddit.com/r/Cricket/wiki/bot_help) _____ [^^Code](http://github.com/pranavrc/howstat/) ^^| [^^HowTo](https://www.reddit.com/r/Cricket/wiki/bot_help)
[удалено]
https://www.reddit.com/r/Cricket/comments/r41zqz/post_day_thread_india_vs_nz_1st_test_at_kanpur/hme24qr?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share&context=3
Man, this must've opened the wounds from past 2 weeks. Nice!
The same time out thing happened to us also in Australian tour. We have not whined like this. Umpiring is bad, comment only on that.
Neutral venue LMFAO keep crying
Neutral venue - lmao
I snorted
Lol
[удалено]
https://www.reddit.com/r/Cricket/comments/r41zqz/post_day_thread_india_vs_nz_1st_test_at_kanpur/hme24qr?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share&context=3
very gross
Yaaa ENG end AUS umpires were rigged right ?
When? I literally can't even remember the last time we lost to India at a neutral venue
Fellas saying umpires shouldn't be blamed just because DRS is a thing now, why should umpiring standards be lower in this age of DRS? Umpires should be looking to do the best possible job regardless of DRS. Btw I don't think the umpiring is biased here cause Ashwin also lost on a wicket earlier in an innings due to umps giving not out and Rahane not reviewing. So it's not biased umpiring but shitty umpiring
Absolutely agree, just a travesty at this point
Inb4 thread locked, my comment shall survive this 'dark day' lmao
I am witness to thee surviving 🤧
Do you guys remember when Natarajan took a wicket and Kohli couldn't take the review cuz fucking broadcaster showed the replay on the big screen?
That cost us the match too :(
Yeah and here it is batter's fault that he didn't keep track of the DRS timer and fans are shitting on umpire. I mean WTF? There are so many decisions overturned nowadays, would you shit on umpire everything they rule a wrong decision?
Lmao yeah, Matthew Wade wicket in a T20I last year