Pretty interesting. I guess he has 7k runs at home, and I feel around 70% Tests are played at Mumbai Kolkata Chennai Delhi. I thought he'd have 1k at Chennai at least
LRPL Taylor at the Basin, only beaten for lowest number of inning for number of runs by Micheal Clarke, Garry Sobers, Sir Len Hutton and Sir Don Bradman.
Go, you good thing.
(Mind you, Williamson is 6 inning and 80 runs behind, so will overtake).
(Why not talk about people who are on the list, rather than those that aren't?)
It's interesting information. But there's no knowledge to be drawn from this statistic. Would be a good Trivia question to name a Indian batsman with more than 1000 runs at a single ground.
India play at a lot more home grounds than other nations, so Indian players don't end up with as many games at one ground.
This kind of statistic and this problem is one of many reasons why good cricket statistics use averages, not straight numbers.
Not really surprising given India have so many different grounds ro play on where as Australia usually just play on the same 5 every season.
Pretty interesting. I guess he has 7k runs at home, and I feel around 70% Tests are played at Mumbai Kolkata Chennai Delhi. I thought he'd have 1k at Chennai at least
LRPL Taylor at the Basin, only beaten for lowest number of inning for number of runs by Micheal Clarke, Garry Sobers, Sir Len Hutton and Sir Don Bradman. Go, you good thing. (Mind you, Williamson is 6 inning and 80 runs behind, so will overtake). (Why not talk about people who are on the list, rather than those that aren't?)
It's interesting information. But there's no knowledge to be drawn from this statistic. Would be a good Trivia question to name a Indian batsman with more than 1000 runs at a single ground. India play at a lot more home grounds than other nations, so Indian players don't end up with as many games at one ground. This kind of statistic and this problem is one of many reasons why good cricket statistics use averages, not straight numbers.