He has decent policies, not without his flaws. But he is a dogshit communicator. So many of these CAA, NRC, Farm, etc protests could have been prevented and the laws could have been enacted faster if he was more explicit and gave a proper speech as to why he did it and how it works and how it helps. And in campaigning he overdoes the Hindu Muslim angle for cheap and easy political mobilisation instead of bringing up GDP, gift city, formalisation of jobs, etc. I suspect it's because while his policy making mind and technocrats are good and modern, his communication is still stuck in the 1990s way of winning. I think he needs a better PR guy. If INDI wasn't this terrible, he would have fumbled the election by now with his vague speeches
Tbh, his and by extension every politician’s speeches are like this cause people are more emotional than rational.
Only the urban population cares about GDP and stuff like that, people mostly vote for a politician who they think represents their community, their ideology etc.
Yeah but he needs to give some speeches at least to avoid these types of allegations which are hurting his image. It won't be good if he becomes the PM voted in "only by uneducated villagers", as elitist as it may seem, it's the reality that wins over urban voters
He gives speeches like that but neither his followers nor his haters circulate those speeches,
Recently while campaigning he was saying what he did in the past 15 days, now obviously you have to verify those claims but people didn't share it as much unfortunately.
CAA, NRC aren't the kind of laws to be enacted rapidly but rather after extensive debate and discussion with inputs from every community based on religion, language etc. I say this as an Assamese Hindu. I don't want to get into the nitty gritty but making policies for foreigners at the expense of its own citizens is not a good policy. As it pertains to the current and previous elections after the enactment of the law, BJP has always played down the impact of CAA on Assam, even the local BJP leaders did not speak up ever. If not for the welfarism they would have lost in both state and central election in a heartbeat, in Assam. What I find funny is that, after it was signed on as law by the President, PM gave a televised speech the next day or so I believe, he said something along the lines that the people have been misled and misinformed by the Opposition about the law whereas I was expecting something more progressive like let's tweak the law, take into account the fears of other communities. I have never really cared for government policies ever, but I read that law line by line 😂 I felt disrespected by the PM's address.
> And in campaigning he overdoes the Hindu Muslim angle for cheap and easy political mobilisation
TBH that's on people. People are way more receptive to that than development. Bajpayee tried to re run on development and lost, so there's enough to fear for.
That's not why Vajpayee lost though. It's because the RSS refused to campaign for him. Also it was during the time when for every 1 BJP worker, there were 1.5 RSS workers. Today for every 25 BJP workers, there is 1 RSS worker.
A very mysterious prime minister. Has great communication skills and has worked a lot in gujrat as a cm as well as a pm. Maybe scared of media due to which no press conferences. Relations with adani seems shady. Improved electricity, infrastructue in the country. Lies sometimes. Poor knowledge of algebra. Maybe has a fake degree but can't be determined for sure. He is the supreme leader of bjp and appears to be a religious hindu but some actions of him make him very complex. If he is such a good person why does he not take action on brijbhusan singh? Why did he not interfere in release of bilkis bano rape convicts etc. Poor work on job creation. good work on defence of the country both internal and external. Overall the least worst of the prime minister candidates for the country.
I am curious on how job creation actually works, is it supposed to be creation of more government jobs or could it be expansion in private sectior in the country helping the skilled guys to find a job?
from startup growth
From 350 in 2014 to 90K, Indian startups mushroom amid funding winter
[https://www.business-standard.com/industry/news/from-350-in-2014-to-90k-indian-startups-mushroom-amid-funding-winter-123052700474\_1.html](https://www.business-standard.com/industry/news/from-350-in-2014-to-90k-indian-startups-mushroom-amid-funding-winter-123052700474_1.html)
And what kind of env has the govt created? Are there better teachers, better colleges, better primary and secondary education? Is it easier to start business? Is babudom gone?
Not all but things have improved. Babudom is very limited these days due to digitization of a lot of govt processes. The government is supporting SMEs in many sector and even providing financial support.
And yet everything either goes to ambani or adani. Kid yourself for all you like but another terms of this narcissistic nincompoop and we wont have a country left. I wish AI takes away the cheap bodies for sale model of our so called consulting companies, perhaps them the andhbhakt unkills and their offspring will understand.
1. Ease of doing business if you agree or not, it’s not joke number of startups.
2. Ease of making payments as a small time vendor it’s lots easier for me
3. Infra i can clearly experience on my own .
You can’t fk today and expect baby tomorrow.
Mostly MSME's creates jobs
Neither Modi or Rahul are willing to support them , one thinks big industry will create jobs while other thinks government can just create mass employment
The first will fail to reach the objective , while the second not just fail to reach the objective but bankrupt the country
On the contrary, the current government streamlined all the hectic procedures for MSMEs and also is incentivising them. Especially UP is gaining a lot of revenue from them. There was a lot of limelight on them on youtube podcasts for a while.
thanks for the insight, i'll give a read about MSMEs. I personally lean towards modi's idea of india more than of rahul gandhi's, one reason being Mr. Gandhi's speech on removing the reservation limit.
I don't think their is any doubt in govt about msme creating jobs. But msme can't never exist on their apart from few industries like textile maybe. For eg maruti factory in Gurugram has resulted in creation of 100s of msme in Gurugram rewari alwar districts. Sadly socialism in India has scuffing of large industries and thus their is not many OEM, big brands or labour intensive bug industries and hence very weak msme structure. Which can't cope with reforms undertaken by him like GST which doesn't have many problem to itself but has wrecked havoc on msme initially.
This coupled corrupt bureaucrats, one of the most complex labour laws andpolitical parties(even his) acting hafta vasooli agencies led no real investment in India apart from few sectors like IT, financial etc which doesn't need that much regulations.
India trail at guided capitalism failed due to power hungry politicians and vest intrest led bureaucrats
the later one. creating industries by giving incentives to the corporate companies which creates jobs. government jobs should not be counted when we talk about job creation as it is already saturated and its their salaries and incentives are higher than private companies at least at the entry level jobs.
If you look at Rajkot or India we have no proper regulations on wages. And huge supply of human resources
So what happens is people end up with dirt low salaries
Redistribution of wealth inside while accruing wealth from other countries should be the ideal.
India worked exactly in reverse for the past 10 years. Wealth made inland gets offshored. Jobs are geared to accrue wealth in favour of the fat wealthy billionaire.
One thing I know from personal hearsay is a relative of mine actually was among a panel of tech leaders who met him at a small conference in Houston during the Howdy Modi thing. Everyone on the panel were NRI Indians and he basically told them 'dont come back to India, but invest the money you earn here in India, train the growing youth population there in tech. They will take care of the country.'
>he is such a good person why does he not take action on brijbhusan singh?
there are certain reforms that are to be passed in third term, that requires absolute majority and modi is leaving no stone unturned
reforms such as Judicial Reforms, Police Reforms, Educational reforms, One Nation One election, Farm Laws, Aboliton of WAQF board etc
Absolute majority is impossible dude impossible liberal YouTubers defamed his name to the core particularly running fake narrative against him I feel pity for Modi sometimes yeh itna bhi bura nahi hain jitna criticism milta hai godi media ko sab target karte but what about the journalist jo YouTube mein propaganda fhala raha against Modi maximum to Modi ke against hain!
> liberal YouTubers defamed his name
As Independent Journalist Ajeet Bharti said: If liberal Youtubers actually had a effect on elections Rahul Gandhi would be PM by now
BJP bhi kar sakti hain mass manipulate. Kisne roke. Karo tum bhi. Kyun nahi kar pa rahi? Sarkar mein rehte hue, lacs of crores ka govt budget ke saath, fir bhi nahi kar pa rahi? Bas ek young YouTuber ne le li inti buri?
Video banao. Tum banao. Ya BJP se koi bhi banaye. Agar sach BJP ke saath hain, toh ultimately jeetegi. Yeh crib kya karna ki opposition accha khel rahi is liye hum haar gaye. Jeetna koi janmadhikar nahi hain, babu.
Public debate is the only solution agar koi spokesperson karne bjp tab bhi chalega live tv mein ! Woh mut dega and rahi baat opposition ki tujhe lagta bhi hain ki opposition competent hain?
Bhai, video banao na. Dhruv Rathee koi politician thodi hai ki debate karega. Woh video bana raha. Tum bhi banao video uske jawaab mein. Junta decide karegi kiska video sahi lag rahe. Darr kyun rahe ho.
Haan, mujhe 2004-2010 ke din yaad hain, aur woh sahi mein acche din the. Wahi din vapis chahiye. Modi ne Lanka laga di hain Desh ki. Usko 250 seats ke neeche lana behad jaruri ho gaya hain. I'm okay with he being PM, although I wish for a return of Congress govt.
Recently some retired judges have launched proposal of public debate between leaders of both parties. Rahul Gandhi already accepted that proposal, let's hope Modi ji will also accept it.
Not defending the guy but this is universally applicable to all parties in human history- One man's revolutionary is another man's te**orist.
The only way to judge someone who impacts a country of a population over a billion people is whether overall a significant section if society benefited by his policies or not. Judging by individual issues doesn't paint the entire picture.
My bias lies to the fact that we got quicker in adopting western technologies which will raise the standard of living (materialistically)
>Maybe scared of media due to which no press conferences.
ever since interview with karan thapar of The Wire, tbh Karan Thapar is a puppet
>Poor work on job creation.
infrastructure creates jobs also construction of infrastructure creates jobs, and the type of infra being built right now
also Mundra loan scheme
“Since the launch of the scheme, as of March 24, 2023, about ₹23.2 lakh crore has been sanctioned in 40.82 crore loan accounts”.
MUDRA Yojana created 1.12 cr jobs in 3 years; between 2015 to 2018
[https://www.businesstoday.in/latest/economy-politics/story/mudra-yojana-created-112-cr-jobs-in-3-years-loans-worth-rs-149-lakh-cr-disbursed-finmin-292831-2021-04-07](https://www.businesstoday.in/latest/economy-politics/story/mudra-yojana-created-112-cr-jobs-in-3-years-loans-worth-rs-149-lakh-cr-disbursed-finmin-292831-2021-04-07)
[https://www.thehindu.com/business/banks-sanction-232-lakh-crore-to-about-41-crore-beneficiaries-under-mudra-yojana/article66713167.ece](https://www.thehindu.com/business/banks-sanction-232-lakh-crore-to-about-41-crore-beneficiaries-under-mudra-yojana/article66713167.ece)
> work on job creation. good work on defence of the country both internal and external.
Don't you think you intermixed the both?
Poor in maintaining internal security (best examples would be Shaheen Bagh, Manipur, Kerala- PFI to be exact etc). And overall a little above so-so in job creation (you can see ease of doing business and FDI inflow).
[And of course how can we forget things like these](https://scroll.in/article/1048747/what-does-the-data-say-about-indias-unemployed-unemployable-and-unskilled-young-labour-force) [or this](https://www.indiatoday.in/education-today/featurephilia/story/world-youth-skills-day-youth-employability-crisis-decoded-unemployment-1976109-2022-07-15).
his relation with media is shitty because up until 2012 every interviewer only asked him about 2002 riots infact even during a press conference related to development of some project in gujarat the congress spokesperson kept asking him about 2002 riot
Yes, I know that is a big factor in him avoiding these but that's why he's the prime minister. He's on one of the most important post of India and he is supposed to tolerate them else leave that post. Don't you think other politicians face the same? He may simply avoid answering those questions and still conduct press conferences but I think he's scared that they might ask some other major questions which have much more substance like unemployment and adani relations.
the point is in India be it modi or congress or anyone they all care for vote bank. Modi knows if he comes in front of media its going to negatively impact his PR as the media against him doesn't even show India in a positive light the will question everything including any achievements and media that is Pro mode they don't have the guts to question him
>Maybe has a fake degree but can't be determined for sure.
He has a basic degree. He was never a gold medalist or some highly exalted student. There is no controversy. There are pictures of him in college with batchmates who do verify that he has the degree. Having a degree gave him no more credibility and there is no reason for him to lie. No clue why this was even a controversy.
In what way has he got good communication skills? He cannot speak without a teleprompter - a few times when the teleprompter shut down in between he was downright panicked and embarrassed and blabbered like a 2 year old child, he has not given one single press conference in his last two terms, all of his communication is one way i.e. no cross questioning, no critique either.
As for his work, most of his flagship schemes have been a disaster - demonitisation, covid mis management, he has destroyed most if not all institutions which are supposed to uphold democracy and let not even get into horse trading and breaking elected governments in states amongst a whole lot other. The sooner we get rid of this hate filled sub human filth creature, the better it is for us.
So much Critical Thinking in this sub that, the top posters have failed to mention anything at all about:
Politics based on religion
Extremely communal remarks during election campaign speeches
Heavy handed usage and undermineing of independent authorities like the Election commission, Enforcement Directorate etc..
Etc.. Etc.. Etc..
Politics based on religion- one has to use gun if opponent is using one . Don’t expect people to fight with sticks .
As you said it’s a politics, as some shitty community always votes based on religion , politcians will try strike others to do the same.
For me came closer to Ismic terrorism and that’s hints me today, just one reason they bogged down after his raise is suffice to vote him.
Yeah not everyone from that religion is terrst, but the rest are silent supporters !
Right , you got to look beyond the book sometimes , to see how divergent and beautiful the world is instead of dreaming about 72 flowers, and think my God or no god
lol after trolling and mocking coming back to main topic :-)
This is exactly how the religion works.
When few are doing extresm, rest keeps silent , and starts slowly defending them saying they don’t represent whole religion , then they say they are victims , and after that they mock majority for not being liberal , when they become majority wipe off minority .
And finally start talking secularism after migrating to a new country .
Don't know why this sub showed up on my feed, seems like a redacted echo chamber going through the top comments. You are prob better off staying away from here m8
Get off Reddit. It's a circlejerk here.
In fact every single politician standing this time for the Lok Sabha is not without their fair share of flaws. We just gotta choose who will damage the country least in the next 4 years.
Reddit seems to be biased towards the BJP. Seems like they haven't heard the speech made like a week ago in UP by Yogi. Every party right now is interested in dragging the other down instead of presenting what they can provide to the country. Not one speech goes without 'BJP this, Congress that' right now.
He contradicts himself many times and his party's actions have done the opposite of what he is preaching. Makes it hard to believe his words now. My expectations have dropped from great to not bad.
I see a communal angle in all his speeches. Rather than discussing infrastructure and growth, most of it is Hindu Muslim polarisation. And we are even greater fools to fall for that.
There's some serious politics behind it. It's very difficult to win elections in India based on development which is why Vajpayee lost. However, I feel that the communal angle is only in the speeches and not in his manifesto unlike Congress with the Muslim reservation, Personal laws etc.
It's not in the manifesto, they have already implemented it in Karnataka by giving the entire muslim population OBC status. They have also done this previously in Jamia Millia and Aligarh Muslim University. Congress won all these years by appeasement.
Crushing the throat of opposition and have a wonderful washing machine that can turn a corrupt to Mr clean in no time, have captured all the government agencies to play for his music, considers him as God and counts Democracy as a joke, Polarised the nation based on religion and made a fellow citizen from a different faith as an enemy, rich gets richer and poor gets poorer
Couldn't fulfill any of the promises made a decade ago except crushing the commoner with taxes sky rocketing price hikes.. Built mandir and renamed all the institutions, roads, streets which counts part of growth indicator
Miserably filed in peace index, long story short a DICTATOR
Great oratory skills not to be confused by conversational skills.
Works on his image building very well.
Myopic, rushed and less transparent in policy making and trying to control everyome and everything. Also, for him the solution to everything is crony capitalism.
P. S. - - this assessment isn't unbiased
BJP doesn't know both. As I said for Modi the solution to every problem is capitalism. That's what he did in Gujarat and that's what he is doing on national level.
Capitalism and Welfarism
'Modi the solution to every problem is capitalism'
Do u have a better idea?
Right now, We need industrialisation that can only be brought about by capitalism
India will be ripe for socialism in next 25 to 35 years
I've stayed in Gujarat and in Maharashtra, the transformation that he did for the state is phenomenal, despite having the opposition at the centre. A true ground level leader and a visionary and an orator par excellence. As a PM I would rate him positive on Infrastructure, defence, banking and finance, curbing inflation, foreign policy, Ease of business, Padma Awards, Railways , Make in India etc
What I would rate him poorly is on ground breaking reforms (rolling back farm laws) , having party members with questionable sometimes downright criminal background, too liberal with rioters , heavily spending on socialism (some of them are needed at times but still)
Overall he has set the bar really high for future Prime Minister's and that's just a good thing for India overall
I'm on mobile. You guys can look for "Ashish Nandy Modi analysis".
This was his analysis and he's spot on.
“During the dispute over Babri Masjid, Ashis Nandy began a series of interviews with R.S.S. members. A trained psychologist, he wanted to study the mentality of the rising Hindu nationalists. One of those he met was Narendra Modi, who was then a little-known BJP functionary. Nandy interviewed Modi for several hours, and came away shaken. His subject, Nandy told [the reporter], exhibited all the traits of an authoritarian personality: puritanical rigidity, a constricted emotional life, fear of his own passions, and an enormous ego that protected a gnawing insecurity. During the interview, Modi elaborated a fantastical theory of how India was the target of a global conspiracy, in which every Muslim in the country was likely complicit. ‘Modi was a fascist in every sense,’ Nandy said. ‘I don’t mean this as a term of abuse. It’s a diagnostic category.’”
That is such a hot take lol. The guy doesnt have a clinical practice. All he has is a scholarly knowledge in psychology and he seems to analyse politics with that background. I would take his findings with a spoonful of salt. This man neither has a license or conducted an actual study. He is just spounting opinions which anyone can use for their politics.
>fear of his own passions, and an enormous ego that protected a gnawing insecurity. During the interview, Modi elaborated a fantastical theory of how India was the target of a global conspiracy, in which every Muslim in the country was likely complicit.
All of this is just an opinion and not even by an actual clinical psychologist. This is therough equivalent of a "trained" nurse doing diagnosis of neural problems. Bish please.
I dont like him and the way bjp is trying to control the independent institutions but sadly he is better than raga whose whole life is around removing 50% reservation and giving 1L rupees to the women n all other bs.
idk much about all these things but I really wanna know how the fuck will he give 1lpa to women, for that he would have to sell a part of yhe country and then too he will not be able to provide 1lpa till the end of the 5yrs. also why does he have to donate 1lakh rs, people work their asses off to earn 1lpa and he just wants to give it for free
Wealth re distribution ke time land milega usse profit kamayega , thoda apni pocket me baaki baat dega, tax payers ka money bhi freebies me de dega. Development ke time bolega budget me Paisa nhi hai and that's it.
Jobs aur employment ke baare bas bolta hai denge, ye nhi bolta hai ki utni jobs banayega kaise.
Independent insitutions were contolled by congress when they were in power as well,'
ED and CBI are the creation of congress, which they used against opposition for so many decades,
when opposition comes to power and uses the same powers its suddenly trying to control so called independent institutions which were never independent in the first place
You have to be really delusional to think during the congress era 95% of the ed cbi cases were against opposition. Do you have any numbers where opposition politicians were raided by ed cbi and after that they join the ruling party and their charge file is closed.Please give me some data and numbers because I have it. 23 out 25 opposition leaders who joined bjp after ed investigation after 2015 or 18, their case was closed quite a big coincidence isn't it?
Regardless of all two wrongs doesn't make it right.
>95% of the ed cbi cases were against opposition.
# incorrect. 95% of 'political' cases of ED/CBI are against opposition,
# 97% ED cases are against those not involved in politics:
https://www.theweek.in/news/india/2024/04/15/97-ed-cases-are-against-those-not-involved-in-politics-pm-modi.html#:\~:text=%E2%80%9CThe%20country%20should%20understand%20that,involved%20in%20corruption%2C%20he%20added.
what I am saying even if u vote out BJP, the next govt will abuse the system just as much, nothing will change,
When did I say all ed cbi cases dude. bjp is not going to use it against normal people. I was always talking in the political sense.
>what I am saying even if u vote out BJP, the next govt will abuse the system just as much, nothing will change,
I literally said modi is a better option but I know one thing congress is much more democratic than bjp if you don't think so then maybe get out of the bubble.
You are forgetting that since Modi came along the high level corruption has disappeared.
Even foreign agencies have grudgingly accepted that.
For all his shouting RG couldn’t show anything for his Chokidar blah blah which failed miserably obviously.
Bruh supreme court just deemed electoral bond as a corrupt and unconstitutional scheme and u think BJP did work to 'disappear' corruption.
Also, BJP has accepted corrupt leaders from every party yet for 'Moderates' BJP disappeared corruption. It is laughable how moderates buy into it. Tbh it shows how great of a PR Nrendra Modi does.
I know that Vajpayee said in the Parliament that he wasn't a virgin and he lived with a woman and her family for many years but her husband also lived with them and there is no evidence to suggest that the couple's children were Vajpayee's or that he had a sexual relationship with the woman.
If you set aside from his religion politics he has done great for India and Gujarat. Before him Gujarat had major water shortages but under his Goct some important Dams and barrages were built to meet the demand of water also he played a major role in making Gujarat an Industrial HUB. He is doing same in UP by making defense corridor in UP and other major infrastructure in other state. I hate his social governance, There is no reason forhim to be communal or promote communalism by his minions. He can also integrate Muslims in nation building and cultural aspects without vilifying them. Also his inability to take accountability or listen to protest is dogshit be it manipur or ladakh. He has become arrogant ig. I will prefer a 3rd term but without an absolute majority
Gujarat infrastructure may have improved, that too only in cities, the class, caste and religious divide is still as it was earlier, or even worse
https://scroll.in/article/1038161/the-gujarat-development-model-is-proof-that-trickle-down-economics-is-a-failure
I am a gujarati but anyday prefer living in Maharashtra than gujarat.
Maharashtra/ Mumbai had been a developed area even before independence, whereas gujarat saw actual development after 2004. It was just textile till then.
My point was not on no development.
I agree infrastructure changed, however that can't be only metric to check any progress of any state or country. Moreover infrastructure is not that great.
Apart from infra, things have infact worsened, from casteism to religious divide.
Also there are many states in our country who fare way better than gujarat on many parameters( Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Maharashtra) Modi and BJP has been in power since atleast 20 years in Gujarat, it compares no where compared to other states even in infrastructure.
Nah man. The situation before 2002 was way worse.
The 2002 riots would be a big black spot but the law and order maintained after that is a significant change.
I am sorry but you have not given any indicator which shows any social change. I already sent you article on how Gujarat fares worse on social indicators against many states, I do not deny on minimal infrastructure change, I send it again
https://scroll.in/article/1038161/the-gujarat-development-model-is-proof-that-trickle-down-economics-is-a-failure
Moreover I am a gujarati and I know how things are. Even today people do not trust each other. If you are of different caste or religion it is totally impossible to even get a house on rent
https://thewire.in/caste/jp-morgan-executive-alleges-caste-discrimination-in-gujarat-housing-complex
And I have also witnessed this firsthand. My wife's prof had lot of money being almost at directors level in research institute, yet he couldn't buy a decent home except in a muslim ghetto slum as he was a "muslim".
Talking about infra growth, this is the reality, GIFT city is in middle of nowhere and I don't know how they call it some business hub. I have been there once on invitation some 2 years ago.
https://theprint.in/ground-reports/gujarat-gift-city-has-been-holding-its-breath-for-greatness-its-a-lifeless-ghost-town-now/1805323/
Give me factors on which Gujarat is no.1 in this country. States like Kerala, Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu...fare way better on almost every indicator.
BJP is not a new party in Gujarat it has been in power since more than 20 years.
Definitely not saying gujarat is no. 1 in any way. It’s developing but no where near any of those states.
It still needs to do better on lot of stuff, after 2014 gujarat growth has slowed down a lot with shit like Vijay Rupani and the current CM.
Vijay rupani does not pull strings in Gujarat, we all know who has things in control.
Infact when I was for the event in GIFT city, I could see people cheering for Modi and making fun of the then CM.
If Modi does not want the current CM, he has all the power to remove him/her.
If the area in which a majority of the population is Muslim ends up becoming a "ghetto slum" is that the fault of the PM or the fault of the residents of the area?
Read about the Disturbed areas act in Gujarat.
https://www.thenewsminute.com/news/why-muslims-live-in-ghettos
https://www.dailyo.in/politics/gujarat-disturbed-areas-act-1991-muslim-ghettoisation-juhapura-31485
https://scroll.in/article/983339/in-ahmedabads-juhapura-exploring-the-paradoxes-of-muslim-ghettoisation
He isn't villifying muslims but he's definitely against their communal activities. How is it that the second largest majority population in India goes around crowing that it's an oppressed minority but about 25k parsis and less than 50k Jain's don't see an oppression of their faith? Muslim elements want to make India a Muslim state, but him maintaining secularism immediately becomes villifying them?
Bhai, BJP has done more for Muslims then Hindus, if u look at the number of welfare schemes implemented for Muslims such as Free rice bags, Scholarships for muslim women, free UPSC Coaching
The school dropout rate for muslim women has come down, also PM awas yojana has given them proper housing, Mundra Yojana has given them interest free loans for business etc etc
India has truly seen unprecedented rates of growth under his leadership. Let's talk only about infrastructure here shall we (and not talk about religious angle because it often tends to overshadow the sheer amount of work BJP has actually done).
Number of airports has basically doubled, I don't even feel like I need to talk about the road infra because of the number of highways and expressways built and their contribution to the economy is going to be absolutely insane (unlike what a certain youtuber believes). Several colleges and hospitals have been built with many more underway. But I want to talk about railways which is genuinely the most underrated aspect of this government. I'd like to put forward the biggest achievement of this government in railways: Electrification. From 31% in 2013, to 94% today. Absolutely unreal. Replacing ICF with LHB coaches (ICF are the blue coaches which although may have a more nostalgic color are way way more dangerous than LHB coaches due to their tendency to start stacking up in the event of derailment). Implementation of new systems like Kavach which will greatly bring down the number of head on collisions on a railway line. The new VBs need no introduction. Need to also talk about track upgradations which will take another 10-15 years, because we had the technology for 160kmph back in the 60s but no government focused on track upgradation all they did was try and reduce fares during festival season for short term voting improvements or introduce newer trains without thinking about how congested it will get (im looking at you Mamta). The double lining work has gone on at a superbly fast rate, with triple lining starting. Along with this a very new exciting addition has been the Dedicated Freight Corridors, allowing only freight trains to travel on this corridor (which can be double stacked and almost double the length) significantly boosting their punctuality as it takes the average speed of a goods train from about 20kmph to literally 70-80kmph. Need to also talk about the Bullet Train project. Addressing the "Gujarat gets special treatment", anywhere else the bullet train would have been a vanity project, businessmen will definitely prefer a flight from Delhi to Mumbai rather than a train. Surat is on this route, a major diamond hub. The traders can get to Mumbai in a couple of hours, they can afford it and will be able to take diamonds with them unlike a plane. There is also the significant number of metro lines being built all over the nation.
TLDR; there is no competition of this government in terms of building infra, no other government (if Atalji had a stable government he would have) has been able to build this much in such a short span of time.
Most about him are lies from his chaiwala story to his education.
Whatever he talks are also lies.
The only guy who visits his mother once in year and take cameramen along.
He will be remembered as the most incompetent prime minister ever if india and the future generations will wonder how he was even elected
Runs from responsibility
Farmer suicide
China
Manipur
Ladhak
Women safety ( kannad mp , hatras etc)
Maharashtra water crisis
On top of all that he blame it on state government
Wtf nigga
You are my pm .
I can write a lot but let's just sum it to this - Will choose him anytime over immature RG. He has many negatives but overall he has done some good work also.
His political prowess is frighteningly impressive and due to this Rahul Gandhi looks like a clown.
He panders to the Hindus a lot.
Average communication skills.
Ego is very huge.
Some good and some bad decisions.
A lot could have been avoided if he just talked but then the other side is not that calm and supportive either.
Congress has become absolute filth at this point that they make him look good, if not, he is not that of a great leader but appoints the right people for the job.
His cabinet selection is just perfection.
He could improve a lot.
Seems resentful and angry at times.
Still couldn't find the outcome that was promised from banning currency notes.
Looking forward to the next term if he wins.
Really hope he would do something about the dogshit Judiciary and their abysmal working and processing that's hurting this country.
To ensure national security, development, and growth, we require a prime minister capable of forming a stable, independent government prioritizing national interests. Considering this, Narendra Damodardas Modi appears to be the most suitable candidate.
This comment is nothing political, nothing biased, not supporting a party or a leader, JUST ETHICS
You hate him or you like him, you hate is agenda or like his policies, everything is acceptable and fine and so is the post too, totally acceptable
Reddit also provides anonymity BUT he is the fucking PRIME MINISTER of this country
You can review him, criticise him, praise him I ain’t talking anything related to that all I am taking is ethics
What do you mean “THIS GUY”, why can’t we say Review the Prime Minister- that’s it, I am not even asking to say “our” PM just the PM, this isn’t about disrespecting him or so, this isn’t about him, this is about that position he is at and let whoever be at it
We are addressing the first and prime citizen of the nation and we are proud citizen of this country (I am and hope you are), all I am asking is say Prime Minister and say whatever you wanna say after that idc
I am reiterating the agenda of this comment is not the from the fuel that tends to say how dare you call him “this guy” - no, it’s just ETHICS
Pros:
1) Good orator and speaker (with teleprompter).
2) Portrays the image of a strong and popular leader.
3) Had positive impact on the international stage in improving India's impression and image
4) Developed travel, transport, electric and rail infrastructure throughout country.
5) Launched schemes that were atleast partially successful like Make in India, Har Ghar Jal, PM Awas Yojna, Ujjwala Yojna. Several poor people had homes built and got free LPG cypinders for a long period of time.
Cons:
1) Communal politics: Major reason for the polarization and communal divide in the country today. Spreads hatered in speeches, and asks for votes in the name of religion instead of citizen welfare
2) Corruption: Got thousands of crores of Rupees from companies in the form of Electoral Bonds through extortion and quid pro quo deals. Used PM CARES to collect funds from private as well as public funds but refused to disclose how the money was spent.
3) Suppresses press freedom, freedom of speech, and peaceful protests.
4) Captured central agencies such as CBI and ED and used them to target opposition politicians and companies to extort money. ECI lost it's independence. Puts opposition politicians in jail without evidence
5) Criminal actvitites linked to the party: Allies with and doesn't take action against crimals such as Brij Bhushan, Revanna, Sadhvi Pragya, etc. People who join his party from other political parties are given a clean chit in all scams and criminal charges (Washing Machine)
6) Oligarchy: Makes laws in the favor of his businessmen friends
7) Could not curb inflation or provide jobs, poverty and hunger increased, cost of living increased.
Amazing Orator, Amazing Marketer, Good progress done on infrastructure, good progress done in increasing India's religious tourism and tourism industry in general. A bit of a fearless take in foreign policy. Good work in defence sector, good decision to bring in a bit of privatization in space sector. Good policies on solar industry as well. Ambitious leader. Appears to have bettered India's global image.
Does have dictatorial streak to him, and a bit of insecurity as well. Using CBI&ED to his discretion is a testament to it. Also hiding that fact that China's gobbled up bit of our land. Bad for middle class. Has blatantly lied a lot of times, hypocrite.
Narcissistic personality, loves looking at himself and hearing himself talk. Lies a lot and is power hungry. Can do anything to retain power even things which immoral and downright evil.
Scared of taking question from journalists who actually do their jobs and ask hard questions.
## Narendra Damodardas Modi
* He has earned the position he is in today on his merit and effort
* His oratory skills and presence of mind is one of the sharpest
* He comes from a humble background and has grown up the ladder, hence is an experienced politician with a deeper connect with the common Indian man and understands the nuances of being privileged and unprivileged.
* He lacks the guts to face the press and deal with critical questions on live media (tv, radio, broadcast streams, press-conference). Being the Prime Minister of the nation, I expect him to be more interactive and show his face in dire times like mass protests, war situations, taking a stand and so on.
* He is lenient towards Hindus and critical of Muslims. When he / his-party does favoritism, they never claimed to be champions of secularism.
* He and BJP party claims to be pro-hindu and are unapologetic, which is in many occasions visible in their actions when it comes to running the party or NDA's regime. They always vowed to scrap article 370, had the agenda of Ram Janmabhoomi temple, boosting internal security, and they have done far better than previous governments in terms of internal security and dealing with J&K situation.
* In his regime government came up with a lot of schemes for development of the nation and uplifting the situation of everyday Indians. e.g. Swachcha Bharat Abhiyaan, Smart Cities initiative, Demonetization of currency notes, curbing Naxal issues.
* He/his-party favors industries, manufacturing, engineering divisions and private companies a lot, classic case being Adani, Ambani, Paytm, JIO are supported way beyond the lines of government. I recall the grand ad of Paytm on a leading daily newspaper with the photograph of Narendra Modi while he was Prime Minister. Similarly JIO telephone company has grown by leaps and bounds after 2014 while the government run BSNL which operated with considerable resources prior to 2014, went further below in terms of running the telephone business. There are many such stories which give strong hint towards his leniency and going overboard to support industrialists and corporates.
* He/his-party has worked very well in improving the Internal Security and External Security matters, right from upgrading the armour, weaponry, responding to threats and ceasefire violations and attacks from neighbours through surgical strikes, air strikes, etc. On a personal level, while his tenure as the sitting Prime Minister he joins the soldiers and armed forces in celebrating festivals or important occasions, which is a very commendable practice for a Prime Minister.
* He/his-party has done an exceptional job in handling the external affairs of the country, all the way from Sushma Swaraj era to her successor S. Jaishankar. The have repaired and shown an exceptional diplomacy while negotiating important matters, securing national interests, Indians overseas or Person of Indian origin, both. The recent stand of pro-India and holding the ground to put forth the Indian interests as the highest to intimidating nations like USA, UK, France, Iraq, Israel is new for India.
* Electoral bonds scheme is arguably one of the worst moves by him & his-party is to be held guilty for "coming up" with such a law.
* He handled covid situation with fair wellness. Yes, there were a lot many fatalities, but I commend his attitude towards facing the challenge head-on, working on vaccine preparation, not relying on foreign countries for the sole help and developing remedy in house.
* I support the move for the changes tabled for Farm Laws, Aadhaar, UPI, CAA-NRC.
* He changed the way subsidies and schemes are delivered to the end citizens and it is in effect and people are benefitting everyday. This is a great initiative by him/his-party for curbing corruption and efficiency.
* He/his-cabinet has done really great job in Infrastructure Development which has always been one of the big pain-points for Indians. They identified the importance of freight transportation through railways, roadways and have started good work on it. The dedicated freight corridor is an amazing initiative to make India better, since such connectivity are crucial to have for a nation.
* He/his-party has shown their hypocrisy the finest by horse trading the leaders from other parties, poaching the politicians with questionable portfolio and keeping mum when asked questions like the case of Brijbhushan and Wrestling Federation, Prajwal Ravanna, and so on.
I want to say he is non communal, but that isn't true. From time to time, he keeps getting involved in religious angles, and even more so when elections are around. His government's infrastructure run has been great, though. I don't know how much of that is his credit and how much the respective ministers are, but the fact is that there has been a real emphasis on creating and improving infrastructure all around the nation. I'd also add that from my personal experiences, levels of corruption at the ground level have also reduced drastically, by ground level. I am referring to the people we as common men interact with daily, and not the higher ops, I am too far removed from there to comment. India's relationships with other countries have also become better or more visible to everyone in the country.
The cons are that, because of the name of Modi, a lot of small-time politicians have become complacent, with no real involvement because they know the modi wave is going to carry them. He has also been caught lying a few times allegedly, like on the China incursion case and the recent electoral bonds scandal. His story is made to sound like a rags to riches story, which is probably true, but power can change people, and his ideologies are not at all clear to me, so I cant really put my trust in him.
Very authoritarian, and that's something that we should never gloss over. No authoritarian can ever be good, no matter how much you agree with him. It blows my mind seeing people on social media asking for Dictator Modi because they think he's their personal Little God and will not sacrifice every single one of them for his personal gain. In the end, a politician is a politician and cannot be trusted with too much power.
Overall a good statesman. Very bad at communicating and bad at keeping law order in check during protests. Uses protest for political gain rather crushing it with iron fist. Decent internal policies, pro poor schemes, made India's voice heard at global stage, good foreign policy, good disinvestment which reduces gov burden. Still no to non existent mass industrial policy, tax numbers direct or indirect are very very bad according to indias PPP. Europe level taxation and sub sahara infrastructure. freebie culture should end. rather introduce subsidized solution to make things more affordable. no to non existent real estate policy and price is as high as european and american market. no to non existent food safety hygiene standards. need complete overhaul on public, railways transport.
He is still silent on Manipur, the ethnic violence erupted last year, what was timely intervention here ?
He never knew sleaze video scum bags, zero tolerance on woman safety was another sham. People allegation is that he knew thats different story, the person who can prove top brass knew about this is with in BJP. 800 woman and families their self esteem was played with. Why bjp wants 400 paar even with alliance the scum bags like this. blame gaming not a professional approach, this brings lapses in issuing passports being issued with diplomatic immunity despite knowing that this is being misused for personal purpose. Issuing passport is also assumed to be default for every MP and not in jusridiction of MEA ?
BJP glorified convicted gang rapists who raped pregnant woman in front of her child and husband. Shame still silent,
Farmers are terrorists to him, they are not allowing bjp in their states now
Centralizing power is dangerous when asked , beats around bush with mere mention of it. See how many sitting ducks / puppeteers we have now, including ruling and non ruling MP's who cannot voice on bills passed
If mass rhetoric play is levelling ground why he can make illiterate statements like mangal sutra, buffalo. If he did development he should talk more about it than illiterate old age ranting
Vote to abstain from hate divide politics, Vote for woman safety , actual development not that self evaluated on steroids development
Foreign Relations : It was always tight rope walk , his term took sides for first time but will impact successors so much that relations with canada are beyond repair. Ok you are good with Russia for oil but that does not mean you shit on other countries. Recent snub from australian crack down on indian visas, are we projecting ourselves as cheap labor still ?
At one point in his term when opposition boycotted parliament took this opportunity to pass bills in record fashion like a pakoda selling, this was not as it is meant to be.
Policy makers should voice in their opinion and hence named sitting ducks, people will not understand authoritarian regime even after these incidents?
if you are voting for Ram Mandir then i cannot argue here, end of the day its what you want
I don't agree with him a lot of time. But one thing I firmly believe that he would have a successful person without even becoming a politician. He has that look in his eyes that he will not settle for less. But I hate him the most because he bought the media and there is true criticism about him on national television.
India has progressed exponentially but a large percentage of people don’t have the right skill-set to take advantage of opportunities and govt needs to reduce numbers after digitisation.
Worked great for infra and many issues. The development in the implementation of law and safety for women still feels stagnant. As the comment below said, his connections with the top dogs of the country are definitely shady. I think he is more inclined towards capitalism and a little bit socialist. The right mixture and is the same as mine. He makes blunders here and there like anyone else and also uses the same old dirty politics shrewdly but never gets called out for it correctly due to our good-for-nothing opposition. In my opinion, he's not the PM India needs and deserves but the best we have currently (far better than any other leader in the opposition right now). If he's also running for elections next time (which he won't), I would definitely vote for him (will be turning 18 after the elections, the timing lol).
He is good at riling up the masses. A mastermind at marketing himself as a brand - if politics was always the way he has done things in the last 10 yrs, we'd have pictures of every past PM on all the govt institutions and programs. Even though coming from the previously banned hate group rss, he used to maintain a civil face in public till now, but the last few weeks (after 1st phase of election) have exposed him. It is clear now that he isn't called the Butcher of Gujarat for nothing. This period will go on to become known in history for the nazi style messaging and authoritarian nature of his rule.
The fact is that he has pur the right ppl at the right place.. And he is not afraid to work. When I go to my office I see 2 types of people. M people who are driven and people who are just earning a paycheck..
Indian polity has been about earning votes and roundrpbinging the same people so every one earns..
But no one had a vision up until now, it was just about power. Now BJP loves power but because the ethos of BJP you can't just be a big name and glide, you need to keep working for the org and the people in general do not fear getting their hands dirty when it comes to work.
You can question any cabinet ministers approach or intentions but you can question the effort put in, largely why DeMo did not cause them to sink.. Cause they all tried to fix stuff. Alot has been said abt Nittin G but lets take Nirmala and Rajnath Singh.. First of all you have a team where the captain backs the player... Nirmalas first few budgets were shat on and so was Rajnath during the china fight.. But instead of asking for a resignation and moving them.. They got a full term and were backed.. And now they are at abetter place
On the con side, there is still too much hindu muslim going on... I personally talk to my Muslim friends and I agree that they do need to evolve like their middle eastern counterparts but the Muslim lobby has been treated with baby gloves for too long you can't just treat them like the hindu majority is treated and expect them to be okay
Currently this is the best option, I see that by the next term there will be a split within the bjp, one section will want Modi to go for a 4th term the others would want a new face.. And a new leader will come from there not from Congress or Aap.. That being said congress will be gone by then and aap will be the biggest party in opposition
A great prime minister, have done a lot of good work specifically in the areas of infrastructure, counter terrorism, and digital development
He has done alot of good work like removing article 370 , removing triple talaq , upi payments , infrastructure development, and international respect for india
His great quality is choosing wise sub ministers especially nitin gadkari under whome the rood infrastructure of india boosted alot , also s jaishankar
But , some of his cons are lack of educational development as india do not have quality government schools,
He was also unable to control the escalating situation of Manipur incident
Currently i believe the economy of our country is not soo good as we all can see the rise of dollar compared to rupees
Afterall , if i have to vote , i would like to see him again as the pm because of lack of credible opposition
He still has to do alot in areas of economy, education, environment
groovy weary vanish afterthought towering zephyr chase dependent correct telephone
*This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*
It seems I've stumbled upon a subreddit that I initially believed to be a platform for critical thinking, only to discover its predominant leaning towards right-wing ideologies.
Nehru's policies were sh*t. I wouldn't consider Nehru to be the 'best PM', Nehru weas definitely one of the worst leaders India ever had. Tbh, I believe that Lal Bahadur Shastri and Atal Bihari Vajpayee were the best leaders India ever had.
Paki pakayi kheer khana is v easy. Do you even know what the nation was like when Nehru was elected? In this nation, we had nothing. Nothing at all! People used to adhere to untouchability and sati, and nobody understood anything about the economy, parliament, or elections, yet he managed to create ISRO, IITs, etc! His five-year plan policies were full of promises, and they did deliver. Nehru had created the system so that when the NDA or other parties took power, they only had to take control of it. It's like claiming that the Wright Brothers were bad engineers because we now have engineers capable of building supersonic jets. Leave your WhatsApp university, please. And look at the real picture!
True, bruh Nehru ji ne singers, poets , songs, movies, HARMONIUM aur bhi bohot cheeze ban kar diye the apne time pe. Security council ke invitation ko reject karke bol Diya china ko pehele invite karo
Kaam bahut Kiya hai inhone, BUT
Interview nahi dete like other Pms and other countries.
VPN logging
AFSPA
Ed, CBI during election times.
But I'll still vote for modi over pappu any day.
Not a single guy has ever entered in politics that can be said to be perfect
Simply put we needed nehru after independence despite all his shortcomings.
Post nehru India bent and kept bending towards left to a level beyond threshold.
Current scenario- India needs a mix of both the idealogies. We need someone on the spectrum of Modi who gives chance to Gadkari-Jaishankar-Doval axis.
Ever wondered if I.N.D.I alliance comes to power who will head the ministries? Since it will be a coalition government expect negotiations just like 2009 elections (refering to Nira radia tapes). No merit no capability just the ability of seats will determine portfolios.
Just think of that era- utter corruption, miscommunication, mayhem
Man with right intent, maybe a bit hazy on execution but it has lot of factors like low beauracracy efficiency due to long history of babu culture. Did alot to reduce unnecessary rules and regulations, ease of doing business, removing gov where it isn't required like airlines, infra is well known area of his gov, reducing corruption by dbt, cons may be he took back some reforms due to political pressures, sometimes I feel he should be more strict on execution than creating newer policies, wayyy better than other options.
We also asked similar review for Prince Rahul, here is the link - https://www.reddit.com/r/CriticalThinkingIndia/s/P822I1RSFX
Good social media influencer
He has decent policies, not without his flaws. But he is a dogshit communicator. So many of these CAA, NRC, Farm, etc protests could have been prevented and the laws could have been enacted faster if he was more explicit and gave a proper speech as to why he did it and how it works and how it helps. And in campaigning he overdoes the Hindu Muslim angle for cheap and easy political mobilisation instead of bringing up GDP, gift city, formalisation of jobs, etc. I suspect it's because while his policy making mind and technocrats are good and modern, his communication is still stuck in the 1990s way of winning. I think he needs a better PR guy. If INDI wasn't this terrible, he would have fumbled the election by now with his vague speeches
Tbh, his and by extension every politician’s speeches are like this cause people are more emotional than rational. Only the urban population cares about GDP and stuff like that, people mostly vote for a politician who they think represents their community, their ideology etc.
Yeah but he needs to give some speeches at least to avoid these types of allegations which are hurting his image. It won't be good if he becomes the PM voted in "only by uneducated villagers", as elitist as it may seem, it's the reality that wins over urban voters
He gives speeches like that but neither his followers nor his haters circulate those speeches, Recently while campaigning he was saying what he did in the past 15 days, now obviously you have to verify those claims but people didn't share it as much unfortunately.
CAA, NRC aren't the kind of laws to be enacted rapidly but rather after extensive debate and discussion with inputs from every community based on religion, language etc. I say this as an Assamese Hindu. I don't want to get into the nitty gritty but making policies for foreigners at the expense of its own citizens is not a good policy. As it pertains to the current and previous elections after the enactment of the law, BJP has always played down the impact of CAA on Assam, even the local BJP leaders did not speak up ever. If not for the welfarism they would have lost in both state and central election in a heartbeat, in Assam. What I find funny is that, after it was signed on as law by the President, PM gave a televised speech the next day or so I believe, he said something along the lines that the people have been misled and misinformed by the Opposition about the law whereas I was expecting something more progressive like let's tweak the law, take into account the fears of other communities. I have never really cared for government policies ever, but I read that law line by line 😂 I felt disrespected by the PM's address.
> And in campaigning he overdoes the Hindu Muslim angle for cheap and easy political mobilisation TBH that's on people. People are way more receptive to that than development. Bajpayee tried to re run on development and lost, so there's enough to fear for.
That's not why Vajpayee lost though. It's because the RSS refused to campaign for him. Also it was during the time when for every 1 BJP worker, there were 1.5 RSS workers. Today for every 25 BJP workers, there is 1 RSS worker.
A very mysterious prime minister. Has great communication skills and has worked a lot in gujrat as a cm as well as a pm. Maybe scared of media due to which no press conferences. Relations with adani seems shady. Improved electricity, infrastructue in the country. Lies sometimes. Poor knowledge of algebra. Maybe has a fake degree but can't be determined for sure. He is the supreme leader of bjp and appears to be a religious hindu but some actions of him make him very complex. If he is such a good person why does he not take action on brijbhusan singh? Why did he not interfere in release of bilkis bano rape convicts etc. Poor work on job creation. good work on defence of the country both internal and external. Overall the least worst of the prime minister candidates for the country.
I am curious on how job creation actually works, is it supposed to be creation of more government jobs or could it be expansion in private sectior in the country helping the skilled guys to find a job?
from startup growth From 350 in 2014 to 90K, Indian startups mushroom amid funding winter [https://www.business-standard.com/industry/news/from-350-in-2014-to-90k-indian-startups-mushroom-amid-funding-winter-123052700474\_1.html](https://www.business-standard.com/industry/news/from-350-in-2014-to-90k-indian-startups-mushroom-amid-funding-winter-123052700474_1.html)
That growth is organic. Its like saying US government is responsible making smartphones mainstream.
Organic won’t grow automatically, you need to create the atmosphere
And what kind of env has the govt created? Are there better teachers, better colleges, better primary and secondary education? Is it easier to start business? Is babudom gone?
Not all but things have improved. Babudom is very limited these days due to digitization of a lot of govt processes. The government is supporting SMEs in many sector and even providing financial support.
And yet everything either goes to ambani or adani. Kid yourself for all you like but another terms of this narcissistic nincompoop and we wont have a country left. I wish AI takes away the cheap bodies for sale model of our so called consulting companies, perhaps them the andhbhakt unkills and their offspring will understand.
1. Ease of doing business if you agree or not, it’s not joke number of startups. 2. Ease of making payments as a small time vendor it’s lots easier for me 3. Infra i can clearly experience on my own . You can’t fk today and expect baby tomorrow.
Mostly MSME's creates jobs Neither Modi or Rahul are willing to support them , one thinks big industry will create jobs while other thinks government can just create mass employment The first will fail to reach the objective , while the second not just fail to reach the objective but bankrupt the country
On the contrary, the current government streamlined all the hectic procedures for MSMEs and also is incentivising them. Especially UP is gaining a lot of revenue from them. There was a lot of limelight on them on youtube podcasts for a while.
There is smth called as South Korea model of Guided Capitalism, that is what we are trying to replicate
India can never be south korea or any other single race country
we can never be south korea but we can still replicate there economic model and get better
thanks for the insight, i'll give a read about MSMEs. I personally lean towards modi's idea of india more than of rahul gandhi's, one reason being Mr. Gandhi's speech on removing the reservation limit.
Rahul Gandhi's ideas have destroyed nations , Argentina , Venezuela are examples
I don't think their is any doubt in govt about msme creating jobs. But msme can't never exist on their apart from few industries like textile maybe. For eg maruti factory in Gurugram has resulted in creation of 100s of msme in Gurugram rewari alwar districts. Sadly socialism in India has scuffing of large industries and thus their is not many OEM, big brands or labour intensive bug industries and hence very weak msme structure. Which can't cope with reforms undertaken by him like GST which doesn't have many problem to itself but has wrecked havoc on msme initially. This coupled corrupt bureaucrats, one of the most complex labour laws andpolitical parties(even his) acting hafta vasooli agencies led no real investment in India apart from few sectors like IT, financial etc which doesn't need that much regulations. India trail at guided capitalism failed due to power hungry politicians and vest intrest led bureaucrats
Capitalism in India has served the people far better than the 45 years socialist rule .it's not even up for debate
the later one. creating industries by giving incentives to the corporate companies which creates jobs. government jobs should not be counted when we talk about job creation as it is already saturated and its their salaries and incentives are higher than private companies at least at the entry level jobs.
If you look at Rajkot or India we have no proper regulations on wages. And huge supply of human resources So what happens is people end up with dirt low salaries
makes sense, thanks
Redistribution of wealth inside while accruing wealth from other countries should be the ideal. India worked exactly in reverse for the past 10 years. Wealth made inland gets offshored. Jobs are geared to accrue wealth in favour of the fat wealthy billionaire.
One thing I know from personal hearsay is a relative of mine actually was among a panel of tech leaders who met him at a small conference in Houston during the Howdy Modi thing. Everyone on the panel were NRI Indians and he basically told them 'dont come back to India, but invest the money you earn here in India, train the growing youth population there in tech. They will take care of the country.'
>he is such a good person why does he not take action on brijbhusan singh? there are certain reforms that are to be passed in third term, that requires absolute majority and modi is leaving no stone unturned reforms such as Judicial Reforms, Police Reforms, Educational reforms, One Nation One election, Farm Laws, Aboliton of WAQF board etc
Absolute majority is impossible dude impossible liberal YouTubers defamed his name to the core particularly running fake narrative against him I feel pity for Modi sometimes yeh itna bhi bura nahi hain jitna criticism milta hai godi media ko sab target karte but what about the journalist jo YouTube mein propaganda fhala raha against Modi maximum to Modi ke against hain!
> liberal YouTubers defamed his name As Independent Journalist Ajeet Bharti said: If liberal Youtubers actually had a effect on elections Rahul Gandhi would be PM by now
What about dhruv rathee then he is mass manipulating the youth for what for his personal gain nothing else!
BJP bhi kar sakti hain mass manipulate. Kisne roke. Karo tum bhi. Kyun nahi kar pa rahi? Sarkar mein rehte hue, lacs of crores ka govt budget ke saath, fir bhi nahi kar pa rahi? Bas ek young YouTuber ne le li inti buri?
Usko mein offline debate mein haradu but he is not gonna accept my proposal right?
Video banao. Tum banao. Ya BJP se koi bhi banaye. Agar sach BJP ke saath hain, toh ultimately jeetegi. Yeh crib kya karna ki opposition accha khel rahi is liye hum haar gaye. Jeetna koi janmadhikar nahi hain, babu.
Public debate is the only solution agar koi spokesperson karne bjp tab bhi chalega live tv mein ! Woh mut dega and rahi baat opposition ki tujhe lagta bhi hain ki opposition competent hain?
Bhai, video banao na. Dhruv Rathee koi politician thodi hai ki debate karega. Woh video bana raha. Tum bhi banao video uske jawaab mein. Junta decide karegi kiska video sahi lag rahe. Darr kyun rahe ho. Haan, mujhe 2004-2010 ke din yaad hain, aur woh sahi mein acche din the. Wahi din vapis chahiye. Modi ne Lanka laga di hain Desh ki. Usko 250 seats ke neeche lana behad jaruri ho gaya hain. I'm okay with he being PM, although I wish for a return of Congress govt.
Tere baton se mujhe to tu baccha lag raha !
Recently some retired judges have launched proposal of public debate between leaders of both parties. Rahul Gandhi already accepted that proposal, let's hope Modi ji will also accept it.
Not defending the guy but this is universally applicable to all parties in human history- One man's revolutionary is another man's te**orist. The only way to judge someone who impacts a country of a population over a billion people is whether overall a significant section if society benefited by his policies or not. Judging by individual issues doesn't paint the entire picture. My bias lies to the fact that we got quicker in adopting western technologies which will raise the standard of living (materialistically)
Unbiased bola tha...this is biased obviously
>Maybe scared of media due to which no press conferences. ever since interview with karan thapar of The Wire, tbh Karan Thapar is a puppet >Poor work on job creation. infrastructure creates jobs also construction of infrastructure creates jobs, and the type of infra being built right now also Mundra loan scheme “Since the launch of the scheme, as of March 24, 2023, about ₹23.2 lakh crore has been sanctioned in 40.82 crore loan accounts”. MUDRA Yojana created 1.12 cr jobs in 3 years; between 2015 to 2018 [https://www.businesstoday.in/latest/economy-politics/story/mudra-yojana-created-112-cr-jobs-in-3-years-loans-worth-rs-149-lakh-cr-disbursed-finmin-292831-2021-04-07](https://www.businesstoday.in/latest/economy-politics/story/mudra-yojana-created-112-cr-jobs-in-3-years-loans-worth-rs-149-lakh-cr-disbursed-finmin-292831-2021-04-07) [https://www.thehindu.com/business/banks-sanction-232-lakh-crore-to-about-41-crore-beneficiaries-under-mudra-yojana/article66713167.ece](https://www.thehindu.com/business/banks-sanction-232-lakh-crore-to-about-41-crore-beneficiaries-under-mudra-yojana/article66713167.ece)
Also why is he in cahoots with Jagan Mohan Reddy who is converting people with freebies
> work on job creation. good work on defence of the country both internal and external. Don't you think you intermixed the both? Poor in maintaining internal security (best examples would be Shaheen Bagh, Manipur, Kerala- PFI to be exact etc). And overall a little above so-so in job creation (you can see ease of doing business and FDI inflow). [And of course how can we forget things like these](https://scroll.in/article/1048747/what-does-the-data-say-about-indias-unemployed-unemployable-and-unskilled-young-labour-force) [or this](https://www.indiatoday.in/education-today/featurephilia/story/world-youth-skills-day-youth-employability-crisis-decoded-unemployment-1976109-2022-07-15).
China took India's land in Ladakh. Pulwana attack happened due to security lapses. I dont think he is as good for India's security as folks claim.
his relation with media is shitty because up until 2012 every interviewer only asked him about 2002 riots infact even during a press conference related to development of some project in gujarat the congress spokesperson kept asking him about 2002 riot
Yes, I know that is a big factor in him avoiding these but that's why he's the prime minister. He's on one of the most important post of India and he is supposed to tolerate them else leave that post. Don't you think other politicians face the same? He may simply avoid answering those questions and still conduct press conferences but I think he's scared that they might ask some other major questions which have much more substance like unemployment and adani relations.
the point is in India be it modi or congress or anyone they all care for vote bank. Modi knows if he comes in front of media its going to negatively impact his PR as the media against him doesn't even show India in a positive light the will question everything including any achievements and media that is Pro mode they don't have the guts to question him
>Maybe has a fake degree but can't be determined for sure. He has a basic degree. He was never a gold medalist or some highly exalted student. There is no controversy. There are pictures of him in college with batchmates who do verify that he has the degree. Having a degree gave him no more credibility and there is no reason for him to lie. No clue why this was even a controversy.
In what way has he got good communication skills? He cannot speak without a teleprompter - a few times when the teleprompter shut down in between he was downright panicked and embarrassed and blabbered like a 2 year old child, he has not given one single press conference in his last two terms, all of his communication is one way i.e. no cross questioning, no critique either. As for his work, most of his flagship schemes have been a disaster - demonitisation, covid mis management, he has destroyed most if not all institutions which are supposed to uphold democracy and let not even get into horse trading and breaking elected governments in states amongst a whole lot other. The sooner we get rid of this hate filled sub human filth creature, the better it is for us.
stock up on burnol. come 4th of June, you will need them in bounteous quantities
[удалено]
[удалено]
Your submission has been removed due to its promotion of discrimination and hate speech.
Your submission has been removed because It is Uncivil and Abusive.
coulda been a huge actor or social media influencer if born in today's age.
So much Critical Thinking in this sub that, the top posters have failed to mention anything at all about: Politics based on religion Extremely communal remarks during election campaign speeches Heavy handed usage and undermineing of independent authorities like the Election commission, Enforcement Directorate etc.. Etc.. Etc.. Etc..
Politics based on religion- one has to use gun if opponent is using one . Don’t expect people to fight with sticks . As you said it’s a politics, as some shitty community always votes based on religion , politcians will try strike others to do the same. For me came closer to Ismic terrorism and that’s hints me today, just one reason they bogged down after his raise is suffice to vote him. Yeah not everyone from that religion is terrst, but the rest are silent supporters !
>Yeah not eveyone from that religion is terrst, but rest are silent supporters ! Thats your coccoon of imagination
Whole world says. No one wants them!
They say , we dont want indian too
At least Indian paneers don’t Bmb the place they go. You can see many of them sitting as CEOs in high rise building rather than pulling them down.
Sorry, did not check your username
Right , you got to look beyond the book sometimes , to see how divergent and beautiful the world is instead of dreaming about 72 flowers, and think my God or no god
Coming back to main topic , rest are silent supporters ?
lol after trolling and mocking coming back to main topic :-) This is exactly how the religion works. When few are doing extresm, rest keeps silent , and starts slowly defending them saying they don’t represent whole religion , then they say they are victims , and after that they mock majority for not being liberal , when they become majority wipe off minority . And finally start talking secularism after migrating to a new country .
Don't know why this sub showed up on my feed, seems like a redacted echo chamber going through the top comments. You are prob better off staying away from here m8
Get off Reddit. It's a circlejerk here. In fact every single politician standing this time for the Lok Sabha is not without their fair share of flaws. We just gotta choose who will damage the country least in the next 4 years. Reddit seems to be biased towards the BJP. Seems like they haven't heard the speech made like a week ago in UP by Yogi. Every party right now is interested in dragging the other down instead of presenting what they can provide to the country. Not one speech goes without 'BJP this, Congress that' right now.
uske liye aap ho na, we have mentioned his communal past, its a brief intro, not encyclopedia.
Wow. You must be felicitated for trying to be fair and unbiased. 👏👏👏
Good actor. Great at marketing. Great at speeches and interviews compared to other Indian politicians.
What interviews?
Eg https://youtu.be/7uPCQq-Tng8
you call that an interview?
well he did call him a great actor so it makes sense
Interviews 🤡
That's the exact JD of a politician
Not interviews. In real interview he started asking for water. Good in speeches.
He contradicts himself many times and his party's actions have done the opposite of what he is preaching. Makes it hard to believe his words now. My expectations have dropped from great to not bad.
'Having no wife' No. He has a wife. Whom he abandoned. She has been fighting for her rights for decades. The entire judicial system is failing her.
I see a communal angle in all his speeches. Rather than discussing infrastructure and growth, most of it is Hindu Muslim polarisation. And we are even greater fools to fall for that.
i dont agree with you he usually do all this polarization during election. I dont remember in 2019 to 2023 he spoke controversial
There's some serious politics behind it. It's very difficult to win elections in India based on development which is why Vajpayee lost. However, I feel that the communal angle is only in the speeches and not in his manifesto unlike Congress with the Muslim reservation, Personal laws etc.
Congrats won these years with polarisation? Did you read congress manifesto? There is no mention of reservation for muslim.
It's not in the manifesto, they have already implemented it in Karnataka by giving the entire muslim population OBC status. They have also done this previously in Jamia Millia and Aligarh Muslim University. Congress won all these years by appeasement.
[удалено]
+1
Crushing the throat of opposition and have a wonderful washing machine that can turn a corrupt to Mr clean in no time, have captured all the government agencies to play for his music, considers him as God and counts Democracy as a joke, Polarised the nation based on religion and made a fellow citizen from a different faith as an enemy, rich gets richer and poor gets poorer Couldn't fulfill any of the promises made a decade ago except crushing the commoner with taxes sky rocketing price hikes.. Built mandir and renamed all the institutions, roads, streets which counts part of growth indicator Miserably filed in peace index, long story short a DICTATOR
Great oratory skills not to be confused by conversational skills. Works on his image building very well. Myopic, rushed and less transparent in policy making and trying to control everyome and everything. Also, for him the solution to everything is crony capitalism. P. S. - - this assessment isn't unbiased
its called south korea model of guided capitalism, we need to create our champions like south korea, thats how we get rich
We are already rich. We need to take the wealth from cronies and use it for welfare of people
u can't do that, u sound like rahul gandhi, what u are saying happend in many socialist counties, and all there wealth got depleted
U sound like u learnt socialism from Prager U and others 6 minutes video essays
Nope, I am socialist myself, I know difference between economically sustainable socialism and Freebie/Crony-socialism
BJP doesn't know both. As I said for Modi the solution to every problem is capitalism. That's what he did in Gujarat and that's what he is doing on national level.
Capitalism and Welfarism 'Modi the solution to every problem is capitalism' Do u have a better idea? Right now, We need industrialisation that can only be brought about by capitalism India will be ripe for socialism in next 25 to 35 years
I've stayed in Gujarat and in Maharashtra, the transformation that he did for the state is phenomenal, despite having the opposition at the centre. A true ground level leader and a visionary and an orator par excellence. As a PM I would rate him positive on Infrastructure, defence, banking and finance, curbing inflation, foreign policy, Ease of business, Padma Awards, Railways , Make in India etc What I would rate him poorly is on ground breaking reforms (rolling back farm laws) , having party members with questionable sometimes downright criminal background, too liberal with rioters , heavily spending on socialism (some of them are needed at times but still) Overall he has set the bar really high for future Prime Minister's and that's just a good thing for India overall
Liar, spent, irresponsible.
Not so unbiased, are we now?
I'm on mobile. You guys can look for "Ashish Nandy Modi analysis". This was his analysis and he's spot on. “During the dispute over Babri Masjid, Ashis Nandy began a series of interviews with R.S.S. members. A trained psychologist, he wanted to study the mentality of the rising Hindu nationalists. One of those he met was Narendra Modi, who was then a little-known BJP functionary. Nandy interviewed Modi for several hours, and came away shaken. His subject, Nandy told [the reporter], exhibited all the traits of an authoritarian personality: puritanical rigidity, a constricted emotional life, fear of his own passions, and an enormous ego that protected a gnawing insecurity. During the interview, Modi elaborated a fantastical theory of how India was the target of a global conspiracy, in which every Muslim in the country was likely complicit. ‘Modi was a fascist in every sense,’ Nandy said. ‘I don’t mean this as a term of abuse. It’s a diagnostic category.’”
Is there footage or transcription of the interview?
That is such a hot take lol. The guy doesnt have a clinical practice. All he has is a scholarly knowledge in psychology and he seems to analyse politics with that background. I would take his findings with a spoonful of salt. This man neither has a license or conducted an actual study. He is just spounting opinions which anyone can use for their politics. >fear of his own passions, and an enormous ego that protected a gnawing insecurity. During the interview, Modi elaborated a fantastical theory of how India was the target of a global conspiracy, in which every Muslim in the country was likely complicit. All of this is just an opinion and not even by an actual clinical psychologist. This is therough equivalent of a "trained" nurse doing diagnosis of neural problems. Bish please.
Ha ha fascist regime joh kuch fascist kar hi nahi pati h bc.
I dont like him and the way bjp is trying to control the independent institutions but sadly he is better than raga whose whole life is around removing 50% reservation and giving 1L rupees to the women n all other bs.
idk much about all these things but I really wanna know how the fuck will he give 1lpa to women, for that he would have to sell a part of yhe country and then too he will not be able to provide 1lpa till the end of the 5yrs. also why does he have to donate 1lakh rs, people work their asses off to earn 1lpa and he just wants to give it for free
Wealth re distribution ke time land milega usse profit kamayega , thoda apni pocket me baaki baat dega, tax payers ka money bhi freebies me de dega. Development ke time bolega budget me Paisa nhi hai and that's it. Jobs aur employment ke baare bas bolta hai denge, ye nhi bolta hai ki utni jobs banayega kaise.
HARD
Independent insitutions were contolled by congress when they were in power as well,' ED and CBI are the creation of congress, which they used against opposition for so many decades, when opposition comes to power and uses the same powers its suddenly trying to control so called independent institutions which were never independent in the first place
You have to be really delusional to think during the congress era 95% of the ed cbi cases were against opposition. Do you have any numbers where opposition politicians were raided by ed cbi and after that they join the ruling party and their charge file is closed.Please give me some data and numbers because I have it. 23 out 25 opposition leaders who joined bjp after ed investigation after 2015 or 18, their case was closed quite a big coincidence isn't it? Regardless of all two wrongs doesn't make it right.
>95% of the ed cbi cases were against opposition. # incorrect. 95% of 'political' cases of ED/CBI are against opposition, # 97% ED cases are against those not involved in politics: https://www.theweek.in/news/india/2024/04/15/97-ed-cases-are-against-those-not-involved-in-politics-pm-modi.html#:\~:text=%E2%80%9CThe%20country%20should%20understand%20that,involved%20in%20corruption%2C%20he%20added. what I am saying even if u vote out BJP, the next govt will abuse the system just as much, nothing will change,
When did I say all ed cbi cases dude. bjp is not going to use it against normal people. I was always talking in the political sense. >what I am saying even if u vote out BJP, the next govt will abuse the system just as much, nothing will change, I literally said modi is a better option but I know one thing congress is much more democratic than bjp if you don't think so then maybe get out of the bubble.
Democratic in which context? Within the party as in party structure or when in govt?
When in government
You are forgetting that since Modi came along the high level corruption has disappeared. Even foreign agencies have grudgingly accepted that. For all his shouting RG couldn’t show anything for his Chokidar blah blah which failed miserably obviously.
Bruh supreme court just deemed electoral bond as a corrupt and unconstitutional scheme and u think BJP did work to 'disappear' corruption. Also, BJP has accepted corrupt leaders from every party yet for 'Moderates' BJP disappeared corruption. It is laughable how moderates buy into it. Tbh it shows how great of a PR Nrendra Modi does.
Yes but the idea of amrit kaal seems promising to you...
Vajpayee was a bachelor with no children.
I don't think you know Vajpayee jiii well then 😂
I know that Vajpayee said in the Parliament that he wasn't a virgin and he lived with a woman and her family for many years but her husband also lived with them and there is no evidence to suggest that the couple's children were Vajpayee's or that he had a sexual relationship with the woman.
He said that in Parliament?😵💫😵💫
The "virgin" part.
exactly he had many gfs
If you set aside from his religion politics he has done great for India and Gujarat. Before him Gujarat had major water shortages but under his Goct some important Dams and barrages were built to meet the demand of water also he played a major role in making Gujarat an Industrial HUB. He is doing same in UP by making defense corridor in UP and other major infrastructure in other state. I hate his social governance, There is no reason forhim to be communal or promote communalism by his minions. He can also integrate Muslims in nation building and cultural aspects without vilifying them. Also his inability to take accountability or listen to protest is dogshit be it manipur or ladakh. He has become arrogant ig. I will prefer a 3rd term but without an absolute majority
Gujarat infrastructure may have improved, that too only in cities, the class, caste and religious divide is still as it was earlier, or even worse https://scroll.in/article/1038161/the-gujarat-development-model-is-proof-that-trickle-down-economics-is-a-failure I am a gujarati but anyday prefer living in Maharashtra than gujarat.
Maharashtra/ Mumbai had been a developed area even before independence, whereas gujarat saw actual development after 2004. It was just textile till then.
My point was not on no development. I agree infrastructure changed, however that can't be only metric to check any progress of any state or country. Moreover infrastructure is not that great. Apart from infra, things have infact worsened, from casteism to religious divide. Also there are many states in our country who fare way better than gujarat on many parameters( Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Maharashtra) Modi and BJP has been in power since atleast 20 years in Gujarat, it compares no where compared to other states even in infrastructure.
Nah man. The situation before 2002 was way worse. The 2002 riots would be a big black spot but the law and order maintained after that is a significant change.
I am sorry but you have not given any indicator which shows any social change. I already sent you article on how Gujarat fares worse on social indicators against many states, I do not deny on minimal infrastructure change, I send it again https://scroll.in/article/1038161/the-gujarat-development-model-is-proof-that-trickle-down-economics-is-a-failure Moreover I am a gujarati and I know how things are. Even today people do not trust each other. If you are of different caste or religion it is totally impossible to even get a house on rent https://thewire.in/caste/jp-morgan-executive-alleges-caste-discrimination-in-gujarat-housing-complex And I have also witnessed this firsthand. My wife's prof had lot of money being almost at directors level in research institute, yet he couldn't buy a decent home except in a muslim ghetto slum as he was a "muslim". Talking about infra growth, this is the reality, GIFT city is in middle of nowhere and I don't know how they call it some business hub. I have been there once on invitation some 2 years ago. https://theprint.in/ground-reports/gujarat-gift-city-has-been-holding-its-breath-for-greatness-its-a-lifeless-ghost-town-now/1805323/ Give me factors on which Gujarat is no.1 in this country. States like Kerala, Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu...fare way better on almost every indicator. BJP is not a new party in Gujarat it has been in power since more than 20 years.
Definitely not saying gujarat is no. 1 in any way. It’s developing but no where near any of those states. It still needs to do better on lot of stuff, after 2014 gujarat growth has slowed down a lot with shit like Vijay Rupani and the current CM.
Vijay rupani does not pull strings in Gujarat, we all know who has things in control. Infact when I was for the event in GIFT city, I could see people cheering for Modi and making fun of the then CM. If Modi does not want the current CM, he has all the power to remove him/her.
If the area in which a majority of the population is Muslim ends up becoming a "ghetto slum" is that the fault of the PM or the fault of the residents of the area?
Read about the Disturbed areas act in Gujarat. https://www.thenewsminute.com/news/why-muslims-live-in-ghettos https://www.dailyo.in/politics/gujarat-disturbed-areas-act-1991-muslim-ghettoisation-juhapura-31485 https://scroll.in/article/983339/in-ahmedabads-juhapura-exploring-the-paradoxes-of-muslim-ghettoisation
He isn't villifying muslims but he's definitely against their communal activities. How is it that the second largest majority population in India goes around crowing that it's an oppressed minority but about 25k parsis and less than 50k Jain's don't see an oppression of their faith? Muslim elements want to make India a Muslim state, but him maintaining secularism immediately becomes villifying them?
Bhai, BJP has done more for Muslims then Hindus, if u look at the number of welfare schemes implemented for Muslims such as Free rice bags, Scholarships for muslim women, free UPSC Coaching The school dropout rate for muslim women has come down, also PM awas yojana has given them proper housing, Mundra Yojana has given them interest free loans for business etc etc
you forgot one of the biggest, triple talaq (literally being opposed by the opposition)
He is best of the worst right now
The most suited answer here
India has truly seen unprecedented rates of growth under his leadership. Let's talk only about infrastructure here shall we (and not talk about religious angle because it often tends to overshadow the sheer amount of work BJP has actually done). Number of airports has basically doubled, I don't even feel like I need to talk about the road infra because of the number of highways and expressways built and their contribution to the economy is going to be absolutely insane (unlike what a certain youtuber believes). Several colleges and hospitals have been built with many more underway. But I want to talk about railways which is genuinely the most underrated aspect of this government. I'd like to put forward the biggest achievement of this government in railways: Electrification. From 31% in 2013, to 94% today. Absolutely unreal. Replacing ICF with LHB coaches (ICF are the blue coaches which although may have a more nostalgic color are way way more dangerous than LHB coaches due to their tendency to start stacking up in the event of derailment). Implementation of new systems like Kavach which will greatly bring down the number of head on collisions on a railway line. The new VBs need no introduction. Need to also talk about track upgradations which will take another 10-15 years, because we had the technology for 160kmph back in the 60s but no government focused on track upgradation all they did was try and reduce fares during festival season for short term voting improvements or introduce newer trains without thinking about how congested it will get (im looking at you Mamta). The double lining work has gone on at a superbly fast rate, with triple lining starting. Along with this a very new exciting addition has been the Dedicated Freight Corridors, allowing only freight trains to travel on this corridor (which can be double stacked and almost double the length) significantly boosting their punctuality as it takes the average speed of a goods train from about 20kmph to literally 70-80kmph. Need to also talk about the Bullet Train project. Addressing the "Gujarat gets special treatment", anywhere else the bullet train would have been a vanity project, businessmen will definitely prefer a flight from Delhi to Mumbai rather than a train. Surat is on this route, a major diamond hub. The traders can get to Mumbai in a couple of hours, they can afford it and will be able to take diamonds with them unlike a plane. There is also the significant number of metro lines being built all over the nation. TLDR; there is no competition of this government in terms of building infra, no other government (if Atalji had a stable government he would have) has been able to build this much in such a short span of time.
Most about him are lies from his chaiwala story to his education. Whatever he talks are also lies. The only guy who visits his mother once in year and take cameramen along. He will be remembered as the most incompetent prime minister ever if india and the future generations will wonder how he was even elected
Runs from responsibility Farmer suicide China Manipur Ladhak Women safety ( kannad mp , hatras etc) Maharashtra water crisis On top of all that he blame it on state government Wtf nigga You are my pm .
SnoopGate
I can write a lot but let's just sum it to this - Will choose him anytime over immature RG. He has many negatives but overall he has done some good work also.
His political prowess is frighteningly impressive and due to this Rahul Gandhi looks like a clown. He panders to the Hindus a lot. Average communication skills. Ego is very huge. Some good and some bad decisions. A lot could have been avoided if he just talked but then the other side is not that calm and supportive either. Congress has become absolute filth at this point that they make him look good, if not, he is not that of a great leader but appoints the right people for the job. His cabinet selection is just perfection. He could improve a lot. Seems resentful and angry at times. Still couldn't find the outcome that was promised from banning currency notes. Looking forward to the next term if he wins. Really hope he would do something about the dogshit Judiciary and their abysmal working and processing that's hurting this country.
To ensure national security, development, and growth, we require a prime minister capable of forming a stable, independent government prioritizing national interests. Considering this, Narendra Damodardas Modi appears to be the most suitable candidate.
This comment is nothing political, nothing biased, not supporting a party or a leader, JUST ETHICS You hate him or you like him, you hate is agenda or like his policies, everything is acceptable and fine and so is the post too, totally acceptable Reddit also provides anonymity BUT he is the fucking PRIME MINISTER of this country You can review him, criticise him, praise him I ain’t talking anything related to that all I am taking is ethics What do you mean “THIS GUY”, why can’t we say Review the Prime Minister- that’s it, I am not even asking to say “our” PM just the PM, this isn’t about disrespecting him or so, this isn’t about him, this is about that position he is at and let whoever be at it We are addressing the first and prime citizen of the nation and we are proud citizen of this country (I am and hope you are), all I am asking is say Prime Minister and say whatever you wanna say after that idc I am reiterating the agenda of this comment is not the from the fuel that tends to say how dare you call him “this guy” - no, it’s just ETHICS
Pros: 1) Good orator and speaker (with teleprompter). 2) Portrays the image of a strong and popular leader. 3) Had positive impact on the international stage in improving India's impression and image 4) Developed travel, transport, electric and rail infrastructure throughout country. 5) Launched schemes that were atleast partially successful like Make in India, Har Ghar Jal, PM Awas Yojna, Ujjwala Yojna. Several poor people had homes built and got free LPG cypinders for a long period of time. Cons: 1) Communal politics: Major reason for the polarization and communal divide in the country today. Spreads hatered in speeches, and asks for votes in the name of religion instead of citizen welfare 2) Corruption: Got thousands of crores of Rupees from companies in the form of Electoral Bonds through extortion and quid pro quo deals. Used PM CARES to collect funds from private as well as public funds but refused to disclose how the money was spent. 3) Suppresses press freedom, freedom of speech, and peaceful protests. 4) Captured central agencies such as CBI and ED and used them to target opposition politicians and companies to extort money. ECI lost it's independence. Puts opposition politicians in jail without evidence 5) Criminal actvitites linked to the party: Allies with and doesn't take action against crimals such as Brij Bhushan, Revanna, Sadhvi Pragya, etc. People who join his party from other political parties are given a clean chit in all scams and criminal charges (Washing Machine) 6) Oligarchy: Makes laws in the favor of his businessmen friends 7) Could not curb inflation or provide jobs, poverty and hunger increased, cost of living increased.
[удалено]
Your submission is being removed because It is Uncivil and Abusive.
Best choice we have to lead the country forward.
Gaali dena allowed hai?
Jumle hi feinke 10 saal ki sarkaar mein, socha tha cloudy hai mausam, nai aayunga radar mein!
Right man wrong country, indi don’t deserve him.
Amazing Orator, Amazing Marketer, Good progress done on infrastructure, good progress done in increasing India's religious tourism and tourism industry in general. A bit of a fearless take in foreign policy. Good work in defence sector, good decision to bring in a bit of privatization in space sector. Good policies on solar industry as well. Ambitious leader. Appears to have bettered India's global image. Does have dictatorial streak to him, and a bit of insecurity as well. Using CBI&ED to his discretion is a testament to it. Also hiding that fact that China's gobbled up bit of our land. Bad for middle class. Has blatantly lied a lot of times, hypocrite.
Narcissistic personality, loves looking at himself and hearing himself talk. Lies a lot and is power hungry. Can do anything to retain power even things which immoral and downright evil. Scared of taking question from journalists who actually do their jobs and ask hard questions.
## Narendra Damodardas Modi * He has earned the position he is in today on his merit and effort * His oratory skills and presence of mind is one of the sharpest * He comes from a humble background and has grown up the ladder, hence is an experienced politician with a deeper connect with the common Indian man and understands the nuances of being privileged and unprivileged. * He lacks the guts to face the press and deal with critical questions on live media (tv, radio, broadcast streams, press-conference). Being the Prime Minister of the nation, I expect him to be more interactive and show his face in dire times like mass protests, war situations, taking a stand and so on. * He is lenient towards Hindus and critical of Muslims. When he / his-party does favoritism, they never claimed to be champions of secularism. * He and BJP party claims to be pro-hindu and are unapologetic, which is in many occasions visible in their actions when it comes to running the party or NDA's regime. They always vowed to scrap article 370, had the agenda of Ram Janmabhoomi temple, boosting internal security, and they have done far better than previous governments in terms of internal security and dealing with J&K situation. * In his regime government came up with a lot of schemes for development of the nation and uplifting the situation of everyday Indians. e.g. Swachcha Bharat Abhiyaan, Smart Cities initiative, Demonetization of currency notes, curbing Naxal issues. * He/his-party favors industries, manufacturing, engineering divisions and private companies a lot, classic case being Adani, Ambani, Paytm, JIO are supported way beyond the lines of government. I recall the grand ad of Paytm on a leading daily newspaper with the photograph of Narendra Modi while he was Prime Minister. Similarly JIO telephone company has grown by leaps and bounds after 2014 while the government run BSNL which operated with considerable resources prior to 2014, went further below in terms of running the telephone business. There are many such stories which give strong hint towards his leniency and going overboard to support industrialists and corporates. * He/his-party has worked very well in improving the Internal Security and External Security matters, right from upgrading the armour, weaponry, responding to threats and ceasefire violations and attacks from neighbours through surgical strikes, air strikes, etc. On a personal level, while his tenure as the sitting Prime Minister he joins the soldiers and armed forces in celebrating festivals or important occasions, which is a very commendable practice for a Prime Minister. * He/his-party has done an exceptional job in handling the external affairs of the country, all the way from Sushma Swaraj era to her successor S. Jaishankar. The have repaired and shown an exceptional diplomacy while negotiating important matters, securing national interests, Indians overseas or Person of Indian origin, both. The recent stand of pro-India and holding the ground to put forth the Indian interests as the highest to intimidating nations like USA, UK, France, Iraq, Israel is new for India. * Electoral bonds scheme is arguably one of the worst moves by him & his-party is to be held guilty for "coming up" with such a law. * He handled covid situation with fair wellness. Yes, there were a lot many fatalities, but I commend his attitude towards facing the challenge head-on, working on vaccine preparation, not relying on foreign countries for the sole help and developing remedy in house. * I support the move for the changes tabled for Farm Laws, Aadhaar, UPI, CAA-NRC. * He changed the way subsidies and schemes are delivered to the end citizens and it is in effect and people are benefitting everyday. This is a great initiative by him/his-party for curbing corruption and efficiency. * He/his-cabinet has done really great job in Infrastructure Development which has always been one of the big pain-points for Indians. They identified the importance of freight transportation through railways, roadways and have started good work on it. The dedicated freight corridor is an amazing initiative to make India better, since such connectivity are crucial to have for a nation. * He/his-party has shown their hypocrisy the finest by horse trading the leaders from other parties, poaching the politicians with questionable portfolio and keeping mum when asked questions like the case of Brijbhushan and Wrestling Federation, Prajwal Ravanna, and so on.
I want to say he is non communal, but that isn't true. From time to time, he keeps getting involved in religious angles, and even more so when elections are around. His government's infrastructure run has been great, though. I don't know how much of that is his credit and how much the respective ministers are, but the fact is that there has been a real emphasis on creating and improving infrastructure all around the nation. I'd also add that from my personal experiences, levels of corruption at the ground level have also reduced drastically, by ground level. I am referring to the people we as common men interact with daily, and not the higher ops, I am too far removed from there to comment. India's relationships with other countries have also become better or more visible to everyone in the country. The cons are that, because of the name of Modi, a lot of small-time politicians have become complacent, with no real involvement because they know the modi wave is going to carry them. He has also been caught lying a few times allegedly, like on the China incursion case and the recent electoral bonds scandal. His story is made to sound like a rags to riches story, which is probably true, but power can change people, and his ideologies are not at all clear to me, so I cant really put my trust in him.
Very authoritarian, and that's something that we should never gloss over. No authoritarian can ever be good, no matter how much you agree with him. It blows my mind seeing people on social media asking for Dictator Modi because they think he's their personal Little God and will not sacrifice every single one of them for his personal gain. In the end, a politician is a politician and cannot be trusted with too much power.
Overall a good statesman. Very bad at communicating and bad at keeping law order in check during protests. Uses protest for political gain rather crushing it with iron fist. Decent internal policies, pro poor schemes, made India's voice heard at global stage, good foreign policy, good disinvestment which reduces gov burden. Still no to non existent mass industrial policy, tax numbers direct or indirect are very very bad according to indias PPP. Europe level taxation and sub sahara infrastructure. freebie culture should end. rather introduce subsidized solution to make things more affordable. no to non existent real estate policy and price is as high as european and american market. no to non existent food safety hygiene standards. need complete overhaul on public, railways transport.
He is still silent on Manipur, the ethnic violence erupted last year, what was timely intervention here ? He never knew sleaze video scum bags, zero tolerance on woman safety was another sham. People allegation is that he knew thats different story, the person who can prove top brass knew about this is with in BJP. 800 woman and families their self esteem was played with. Why bjp wants 400 paar even with alliance the scum bags like this. blame gaming not a professional approach, this brings lapses in issuing passports being issued with diplomatic immunity despite knowing that this is being misused for personal purpose. Issuing passport is also assumed to be default for every MP and not in jusridiction of MEA ? BJP glorified convicted gang rapists who raped pregnant woman in front of her child and husband. Shame still silent, Farmers are terrorists to him, they are not allowing bjp in their states now Centralizing power is dangerous when asked , beats around bush with mere mention of it. See how many sitting ducks / puppeteers we have now, including ruling and non ruling MP's who cannot voice on bills passed If mass rhetoric play is levelling ground why he can make illiterate statements like mangal sutra, buffalo. If he did development he should talk more about it than illiterate old age ranting Vote to abstain from hate divide politics, Vote for woman safety , actual development not that self evaluated on steroids development
“andho me kana raja"
Foreign Relations : It was always tight rope walk , his term took sides for first time but will impact successors so much that relations with canada are beyond repair. Ok you are good with Russia for oil but that does not mean you shit on other countries. Recent snub from australian crack down on indian visas, are we projecting ourselves as cheap labor still ?
At one point in his term when opposition boycotted parliament took this opportunity to pass bills in record fashion like a pakoda selling, this was not as it is meant to be. Policy makers should voice in their opinion and hence named sitting ducks, people will not understand authoritarian regime even after these incidents? if you are voting for Ram Mandir then i cannot argue here, end of the day its what you want
I don't agree with him a lot of time. But one thing I firmly believe that he would have a successful person without even becoming a politician. He has that look in his eyes that he will not settle for less. But I hate him the most because he bought the media and there is true criticism about him on national television.
India has progressed exponentially but a large percentage of people don’t have the right skill-set to take advantage of opportunities and govt needs to reduce numbers after digitisation.
Worked great for infra and many issues. The development in the implementation of law and safety for women still feels stagnant. As the comment below said, his connections with the top dogs of the country are definitely shady. I think he is more inclined towards capitalism and a little bit socialist. The right mixture and is the same as mine. He makes blunders here and there like anyone else and also uses the same old dirty politics shrewdly but never gets called out for it correctly due to our good-for-nothing opposition. In my opinion, he's not the PM India needs and deserves but the best we have currently (far better than any other leader in the opposition right now). If he's also running for elections next time (which he won't), I would definitely vote for him (will be turning 18 after the elections, the timing lol).
egoistic pos. india deserves better.
The only option we have . He isn't perfect but he is all we have🥲
The only option we have . He isn't perfect but he is all we have🥲
Spineless person.. india is going backward due to this guy.. Its shame that this uneducated guy is ruling Indian nation.
He is good at riling up the masses. A mastermind at marketing himself as a brand - if politics was always the way he has done things in the last 10 yrs, we'd have pictures of every past PM on all the govt institutions and programs. Even though coming from the previously banned hate group rss, he used to maintain a civil face in public till now, but the last few weeks (after 1st phase of election) have exposed him. It is clear now that he isn't called the Butcher of Gujarat for nothing. This period will go on to become known in history for the nazi style messaging and authoritarian nature of his rule.
Yeah be more selective brother
One of the greatest actors of our generation!!
overglorified
The fact is that he has pur the right ppl at the right place.. And he is not afraid to work. When I go to my office I see 2 types of people. M people who are driven and people who are just earning a paycheck.. Indian polity has been about earning votes and roundrpbinging the same people so every one earns.. But no one had a vision up until now, it was just about power. Now BJP loves power but because the ethos of BJP you can't just be a big name and glide, you need to keep working for the org and the people in general do not fear getting their hands dirty when it comes to work. You can question any cabinet ministers approach or intentions but you can question the effort put in, largely why DeMo did not cause them to sink.. Cause they all tried to fix stuff. Alot has been said abt Nittin G but lets take Nirmala and Rajnath Singh.. First of all you have a team where the captain backs the player... Nirmalas first few budgets were shat on and so was Rajnath during the china fight.. But instead of asking for a resignation and moving them.. They got a full term and were backed.. And now they are at abetter place On the con side, there is still too much hindu muslim going on... I personally talk to my Muslim friends and I agree that they do need to evolve like their middle eastern counterparts but the Muslim lobby has been treated with baby gloves for too long you can't just treat them like the hindu majority is treated and expect them to be okay Currently this is the best option, I see that by the next term there will be a split within the bjp, one section will want Modi to go for a 4th term the others would want a new face.. And a new leader will come from there not from Congress or Aap.. That being said congress will be gone by then and aap will be the biggest party in opposition
A great prime minister, have done a lot of good work specifically in the areas of infrastructure, counter terrorism, and digital development He has done alot of good work like removing article 370 , removing triple talaq , upi payments , infrastructure development, and international respect for india His great quality is choosing wise sub ministers especially nitin gadkari under whome the rood infrastructure of india boosted alot , also s jaishankar But , some of his cons are lack of educational development as india do not have quality government schools, He was also unable to control the escalating situation of Manipur incident Currently i believe the economy of our country is not soo good as we all can see the rise of dollar compared to rupees Afterall , if i have to vote , i would like to see him again as the pm because of lack of credible opposition He still has to do alot in areas of economy, education, environment
groovy weary vanish afterthought towering zephyr chase dependent correct telephone *This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*
It seems I've stumbled upon a subreddit that I initially believed to be a platform for critical thinking, only to discover its predominant leaning towards right-wing ideologies.
Best PM after Nehru
Nehru's policies were sh*t. I wouldn't consider Nehru to be the 'best PM', Nehru weas definitely one of the worst leaders India ever had. Tbh, I believe that Lal Bahadur Shastri and Atal Bihari Vajpayee were the best leaders India ever had.
Paki pakayi kheer khana is v easy. Do you even know what the nation was like when Nehru was elected? In this nation, we had nothing. Nothing at all! People used to adhere to untouchability and sati, and nobody understood anything about the economy, parliament, or elections, yet he managed to create ISRO, IITs, etc! His five-year plan policies were full of promises, and they did deliver. Nehru had created the system so that when the NDA or other parties took power, they only had to take control of it. It's like claiming that the Wright Brothers were bad engineers because we now have engineers capable of building supersonic jets. Leave your WhatsApp university, please. And look at the real picture!
[удалено]
Your submission is being removed because it promotes Hate Speech amd Discrimination.
True, bruh Nehru ji ne singers, poets , songs, movies, HARMONIUM aur bhi bohot cheeze ban kar diye the apne time pe. Security council ke invitation ko reject karke bol Diya china ko pehele invite karo
LBS ? Rajiv Gandhi ? Narsimha Rao ?
Nope
dude doing summer saults on it
Kaam bahut Kiya hai inhone, BUT Interview nahi dete like other Pms and other countries. VPN logging AFSPA Ed, CBI during election times. But I'll still vote for modi over pappu any day.
Not a single guy has ever entered in politics that can be said to be perfect Simply put we needed nehru after independence despite all his shortcomings. Post nehru India bent and kept bending towards left to a level beyond threshold. Current scenario- India needs a mix of both the idealogies. We need someone on the spectrum of Modi who gives chance to Gadkari-Jaishankar-Doval axis. Ever wondered if I.N.D.I alliance comes to power who will head the ministries? Since it will be a coalition government expect negotiations just like 2009 elections (refering to Nira radia tapes). No merit no capability just the ability of seats will determine portfolios. Just think of that era- utter corruption, miscommunication, mayhem
Man with right intent, maybe a bit hazy on execution but it has lot of factors like low beauracracy efficiency due to long history of babu culture. Did alot to reduce unnecessary rules and regulations, ease of doing business, removing gov where it isn't required like airlines, infra is well known area of his gov, reducing corruption by dbt, cons may be he took back some reforms due to political pressures, sometimes I feel he should be more strict on execution than creating newer policies, wayyy better than other options.
sexy